#adaptable — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #adaptable, aggregated by home.social.
-
My #QuestionOfTheWeek (which is not really a question today): Keep On Keeping On: One Small Step at a Time
https://createadaptablelife.com/2026/01/keep-on-keeping-on-one-small-step-at-a-time.html
#Adaptable #Life -
TPDE: A Fast Adaptable Compiler Back-End Framework
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22610
#HackerNews #TPDE #Compiler #Fast #Adaptable #Framework #Back-End #Technology
-
The red #fox #Vulpes vulpes (#Canidae, #Carnivora) is known in fairy tales for its cunning and intelligence. From a #biological perspective, it is one thing above all: #adaptable. This also explains the quite large #population of #urban #foxes in #Berlin. Sometimes individuals appear in crowded city #parks on the brightest day and go about their way without fear, like here at Plötzensee Park.
#urbannature #biodiversity
© #StefanFWirth Berlin 2019/ 2024 -
#Tearing Down #Nakagin #Capsule #Tower - JSTOR Daily
#Japanese #Metabolists argued that #architecture should be #adaptable, changing as a #city changed. Why, then, is this #icon of #Metabolism being #dismantled?
-
#Tearing Down #Nakagin #Capsule #Tower - JSTOR Daily
#Japanese #Metabolists argued that #architecture should be #adaptable, changing as a #city changed. Why, then, is this #icon of #Metabolism being #dismantled?
-
#Tearing Down #Nakagin #Capsule #Tower - JSTOR Daily
#Japanese #Metabolists argued that #architecture should be #adaptable, changing as a #city changed. Why, then, is this #icon of #Metabolism being #dismantled?
-
#Tearing Down #Nakagin #Capsule #Tower - JSTOR Daily
#Japanese #Metabolists argued that #architecture should be #adaptable, changing as a #city changed. Why, then, is this #icon of #Metabolism being #dismantled?
-
Aussie and Kiwi writers!
Applications are open for Queensland Writers Centre's Adaptable, where you get a chance to pitch your work to producers.
I took part this year and highly recommend it if you've ever thought of adapting your book/manuscript for the screen
Closes: 17 January 2023
-
Aussie and Kiwi writers!
Applications are open for Queensland Writers Centre's Adaptable, where you get a chance to pitch your work to producers.
I took part this year and highly recommend it if you've ever thought of adapting your book/manuscript for the screen
Closes: 17 January 2023
-
Aussie and Kiwi writers!
Applications are open for Queensland Writers Centre's Adaptable, where you get a chance to pitch your work to producers.
I took part this year and highly recommend it if you've ever thought of adapting your book/manuscript for the screen
Closes: 17 January 2023
-
@Empiricism Sometimes I can be too subtle, other times too cryptic.
My "added comments" would be just hoping to extend what I find to be valuable posts. Stronger critique or disagreement would (hopefully) be more obvious!
I think the term #CognitiveDissonance isn't going away, nor should be. I think #CognitiveHarmony fits very well with it.
When "solutions aren't clear" then we have a false state of harmony, no? [problem > solution > (harmony?) bias > correction > harmony!]
So now we can see that 'truth' (as applied to #ScientificConsensus) plays a role, in addition to perception. [The #historic unsolved problem of perception of #consonance deals directly with the human side, where #perception & opinion reign. This perception of "sounds right/good" does not cross #cultural boundaries without its own dissonance.]
So we have both #binary situations (T/F) and #trinary (and beyond), where there is no #ExcludedMiddle, no right/wrong. I'd like to invoke a #systemic description that can accommodate these different levels.
Even if this is just meant for individuals, a #gradient, #quantitative style of #measurement could be a helpful addition to what you laid out. It can help us be more #adaptable, accepting of change or differences, not feeling 'stupid' when wrong (or viewing others through that lens), participate more effectively in #democratic & scientific #processes, etc.
This is a #generalized enough idea that it is able to cross over into many, even disparate #disciplines. I think we align with the desire to improve existing #models, including the way they are communicated to the public.
-
@Empiricism Sometimes I can be too subtle, other times too cryptic.
My "added comments" would be just hoping to extend what I find to be valuable posts. Stronger critique or disagreement would (hopefully) be more obvious!
I think the term #CognitiveDissonance isn't going away, nor should be. I think #CognitiveHarmony fits very well with it.
When "solutions aren't clear" then we have a false state of harmony, no? [problem > solution > (harmony?) bias > correction > harmony!]
So now we can see that 'truth' (as applied to #ScientificConsensus) plays a role, in addition to perception. [The #historic unsolved problem of perception of #consonance deals directly with the human side, where #perception & opinion reign. This perception of "sounds right/good" does not cross #cultural boundaries without its own dissonance.]
So we have both #binary situations (T/F) and #trinary (and beyond), where there is no #ExcludedMiddle, no right/wrong. I'd like to invoke a #systemic description that can accommodate these different levels.
Even if this is just meant for individuals, a #gradient, #quantitative style of #measurement could be a helpful addition to what you laid out. It can help us be more #adaptable, accepting of change or differences, not feeling 'stupid' when wrong (or viewing others through that lens), participate more effectively in #democratic & scientific #processes, etc.
This is a #generalized enough idea that it is able to cross over into many, even disparate #disciplines. I think we align with the desire to improve existing #models, including the way they are communicated to the public.
-
@Empiricism Sometimes I can be too subtle, other times too cryptic.
My "added comments" would be just hoping to extend what I find to be valuable posts. Stronger critique or disagreement would (hopefully) be more obvious!
I think the term #CognitiveDissonance isn't going away, nor should be. I think #CognitiveHarmony fits very well with it.
When "solutions aren't clear" then we have a false state of harmony, no? [problem > solution > (harmony?) bias > correction > harmony!]
So now we can see that 'truth' (as applied to #ScientificConsensus) plays a role, in addition to perception. [The #historic unsolved problem of perception of #consonance deals directly with the human side, where #perception & opinion reign. This perception of "sounds right/good" does not cross #cultural boundaries without its own dissonance.]
So we have both #binary situations (T/F) and #trinary (and beyond), where there is no #ExcludedMiddle, no right/wrong. I'd like to invoke a #systemic description that can accommodate these different levels.
Even if this is just meant for individuals, a #gradient, #quantitative style of #measurement could be a helpful addition to what you laid out. It can help us be more #adaptable, accepting of change or differences, not feeling 'stupid' when wrong (or viewing others through that lens), participate more effectively in #democratic & scientific #processes, etc.
This is a #generalized enough idea that it is able to cross over into many, even disparate #disciplines. I think we align with the desire to improve existing #models, including the way they are communicated to the public.
-
@Empiricism Sometimes I can be too subtle, other times too cryptic.
My "added comments" would be just hoping to extend what I find to be valuable posts. Stronger critique or disagreement would (hopefully) be more obvious!
I think the term #CognitiveDissonance isn't going away, nor should be. I think #CognitiveHarmony fits very well with it.
When "solutions aren't clear" then we have a false state of harmony, no? [problem > solution > (harmony?) bias > correction > harmony!]
So now we can see that 'truth' (as applied to #ScientificConsensus) plays a role, in addition to perception. [The #historic unsolved problem of perception of #consonance deals directly with the human side, where #perception & opinion reign. This perception of "sounds right/good" does not cross #cultural boundaries without its own dissonance.]
So we have both #binary situations (T/F) and #trinary (and beyond), where there is no #ExcludedMiddle, no right/wrong. I'd like to invoke a #systemic description that can accommodate these different levels.
Even if this is just meant for individuals, a #gradient, #quantitative style of #measurement could be a helpful addition to what you laid out. It can help us be more #adaptable, accepting of change or differences, not feeling 'stupid' when wrong (or viewing others through that lens), participate more effectively in #democratic & scientific #processes, etc.
This is a #generalized enough idea that it is able to cross over into many, even disparate #disciplines. I think we align with the desire to improve existing #models, including the way they are communicated to the public.
-
@Empiricism Sometimes I can be too subtle, other times too cryptic.
My "added comments" would be just hoping to extend what I find to be valuable posts. Stronger critique or disagreement would (hopefully) be more obvious!
I think the term #CognitiveDissonance isn't going away, nor should be. I think #CognitiveHarmony fits very well with it.
When "solutions aren't clear" then we have a false state of harmony, no? [problem > solution > (harmony?) bias > correction > harmony!]
So now we can see that 'truth' (as applied to #ScientificConsensus) plays a role, in addition to perception. [The #historic unsolved problem of perception of #consonance deals directly with the human side, where #perception & opinion reign. This perception of "sounds right/good" does not cross #cultural boundaries without its own dissonance.]
So we have both #binary situations (T/F) and #trinary (and beyond), where there is no #ExcludedMiddle, no right/wrong. I'd like to invoke a #systemic description that can accommodate these different levels.
Even if this is just meant for individuals, a #gradient, #quantitative style of #measurement could be a helpful addition to what you laid out. It can help us be more #adaptable, accepting of change or differences, not feeling 'stupid' when wrong (or viewing others through that lens), participate more effectively in #democratic & scientific #processes, etc.
This is a #generalized enough idea that it is able to cross over into many, even disparate #disciplines. I think we align with the desire to improve existing #models, including the way they are communicated to the public.
-
> We all know what demanding pets cats can be, but what about #dogs? You ever seen a #dog turn up its nose at a $200 bed, or the five-dollar-a-can gourmet food you bought for it at the organic pet store? Of course not. Why not? Because dogs are highly #adaptable. They’re #lowmaintenance , #accommodating, and they acclimate to their surroundings with ease.