Search
1000 results for “lucii”
-
CW: 𝗟𝘂𝗰𝗶 𝗟/luciislane professional nude model #ebonygirl
#𝗟𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗟 #luciislane professional #nudemodel #ebonygirl
-
CW: 𝗟𝘂𝗰𝗶 𝗟/luciislane professional nude model #ebonygirl
#𝗟𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗟 #luciislane professional #nudemodel #ebonygirl
-
CHROME COLOGNE with GRAVEDGR, Luciid, Ramona, uvm @ Bootshaus - 14 Nov feat. CÖLN, GRAVEDGR, Leonard Palm + more
-
https://www.europesays.com/cz/51668/ Neumannová o partnerovi dcery: SKRYTÁ VÝTKA KVŮLI LUCII #dcera #JiříLehečka #KateřinaNeumannová #LucieNeumannová #přítel #Rodina #Sport #Sports #vztah #žhavéDrby
-
Po osmi letech má Zlínský kraj vítěze Zlatého Ámose. Titul pro nejoblíbenějšího učitele či učitelku v Česku získala Adéla Langerová z prvního stupně Základní školy Mikoláše Alše ve Zlíně a navázala tak na chemikářku Lucii Bakalovou z holešovského Gymnázia Ladislava Jaroše, která vyhrála v roce 2018.
-
🆕 New artists added to Terminal V Festival 2026
🔥 Lola Cerise, Tommy Holohan, Will Atkinson, Emilija, I Hate Models, Alex Farell, Luciid, Clouds (8 total)
🎶 All my playlists & socials: https://fyrefestivals.co
#FyreFestivals #Terminal_V_Festival_2026 #Edinburgh #Spring2026 #SpringMusic
-
Rok 2023 je pro mě ve znamení naprostého haluze! 😂
Nicméně všem vám, kteří jste tuhle šílenost politikou své peněženky stvořili, moc s Lucií Škodovou a Adamem Pýchou děkujeme!
#Vesmírníček je v 🇨🇿nejprodávanější dětská kniha roku.
Jdu si na 🍞namazat Harryho Pottera či Poseroutku.
-
INN Brno: Křehké zázemí (projekce filmů My Street Films)
Galerie TIC, úterý 24. března v 18:00 SEČ
Srdečně zveme na projekci krátkých filmů My Street Films. Akcí Vás provede Andrea Vašků, účastnice workshopů a lokální koordinátorka My Street Films, zároveň členka INNu.
Po projekci následuje moderovaná debata reflektující zkušenost s natáčením s Lucii Pozníkovou, autorkou filmu Brno-Zábradlí.
- úterý 24. března 2026, 18:00
- Galerie TIC – Kino CIT, Radnická 4Křehké zázemí (projekce filmů My Street Films)
Projekce krátkých filmů, které vznikly (nejen) v rámci brněnského workshopu My Street Films, zachycuje město v pohybu: domy, které mizí, čtvrti, jež se proměňují, i generaci hledající své místo mezi nájmem a nejistotou. Snímky otevírají témata domova, křehkosti zázemí i proměn městského prostoru a vytvářejí prostor k debatě o tom, komu dnes město patří a jak v něm lze důstojně bydlet.Filmy (celková doba trvání je 44 minut):
Brno–Zábradlí
Objekt střežen
Manchester, co mizí
Za plakátem
Neotevírat
Kino je v prvním poschodí Galerie TIC bez možnosti bezbariérového přístupu.
www.galerie-tic.cz/cs/kino-cit-2
https://akce.nolog.cz/event/inn-brno-krehke-zazemi-projekce-filmu-my-street-films
-
„Lofi Girl skończy studia przed premierą”. GTA 6 ponownie opóźnione
To już oficjalne: na Grand Theft Auto 6 poczekamy jeszcze dłużej. Rockstar Games, twórca najbardziej oczekiwanej gry dekady, ogłosił właśnie drugie opóźnienie premiery.
Nową, ostateczną (miejmy nadzieję) datą jest 19 listopada 2026 roku.
Przypomnijmy, że pierwotnie gra miała ukazać się jesienią 2025 roku. Już raz została przełożona na maj 2026, a teraz wiemy, że i ten termin jest nierealny.
W oficjalnym oświadczeniu Rockstar przeprosił fanów za „dodatkowy czas” oczekiwania i podziękował za cierpliwość. Studio stwierdziło, że potrzebuje dodatkowych miesięcy, aby „dokończyć grę na poziomie dopieszczenia, jakiego fani oczekują i na jaki zasługują”.
„Lofi Girl w końcu skończy studia”
Wieść o kolejnym opóźnieniu tradycyjnie wywołała w internecie mieszankę złości, żartów i, co ciekawe, akceptacji. Poprzednia część serii, GTA 5, ukazała się w 2013 roku i choć ma już 12 lat, dzięki trybowi online wciąż pozostaje gigantycznie popularna.
Popularny streamer IShowSpeed w typowym dla siebie stylu zareagował na newsa podczas transmisji: „Będę miał 50 lat, zanim ta gra wyjdzie. Mogę już mieć wtedy dzieci i żonę!”.
Oficjalne konto animowanej postaci Lofi Girl, która od 2017 roku „uczy się” non-stop na YouTube, zażartowało: „Wygląda na to, że faktycznie skończę studia przed premierą GTA 6”.
Wielu fanów podeszło jednak do sprawy ze zrozumieniem, twierdząc, że wolą poczekać dłużej na dopracowany produkt niż otrzymać niedokończoną grę.
Perfekcjonizm, zwolnienia i rekordowe koszty
Rockstar jest znany ze swojego perfekcjonizmu i notorycznego opóźniania premier. Ich poprzedni wielki hit, Red Dead Redemption 2, również zaliczył roczne opóźnienie względem pierwotnej daty.
Ogłoszenie zbiega się jednak w czasie z niepokojącymi doniesieniami. 30 października z brytyjskich studiów Rockstara zwolniono 31 pracowników. Reprezentujący ich związek zawodowy (IWGB) oskarżył firmę o celowe zwalnianie ludzi, aby powstrzymać ich przed zrzeszaniem się.
Kiedy GTA 6 w końcu trafi na rynek, będzie prawdopodobnie jedną z najdroższych gier w historii. Oczekuje się również, że pobije wszelkie rekordy sprzedaży w dniu premiery. Gra ma zabrać nas do Leonidy (fikcyjnej Florydy) i współczesnej wersji Vice City, a fabuła skupi się na parze kochanków i kryminalistów, Lucii i Jasonie.
#gaming #GrandTheftAuto6 #GTA6 #IShowSpeed #Leonida #LofiGirl #news #nowaDataPremiery #opóźnienie #RockstarGames #ViceCity
-
„Lofi Girl skończy studia przed premierą”. GTA 6 ponownie opóźnione
To już oficjalne: na Grand Theft Auto 6 poczekamy jeszcze dłużej. Rockstar Games, twórca najbardziej oczekiwanej gry dekady, ogłosił właśnie drugie opóźnienie premiery.
Nową, ostateczną (miejmy nadzieję) datą jest 19 listopada 2026 roku.
Przypomnijmy, że pierwotnie gra miała ukazać się jesienią 2025 roku. Już raz została przełożona na maj 2026, a teraz wiemy, że i ten termin jest nierealny.
W oficjalnym oświadczeniu Rockstar przeprosił fanów za „dodatkowy czas” oczekiwania i podziękował za cierpliwość. Studio stwierdziło, że potrzebuje dodatkowych miesięcy, aby „dokończyć grę na poziomie dopieszczenia, jakiego fani oczekują i na jaki zasługują”.
„Lofi Girl w końcu skończy studia”
Wieść o kolejnym opóźnieniu tradycyjnie wywołała w internecie mieszankę złości, żartów i, co ciekawe, akceptacji. Poprzednia część serii, GTA 5, ukazała się w 2013 roku i choć ma już 12 lat, dzięki trybowi online wciąż pozostaje gigantycznie popularna.
Popularny streamer IShowSpeed w typowym dla siebie stylu zareagował na newsa podczas transmisji: „Będę miał 50 lat, zanim ta gra wyjdzie. Mogę już mieć wtedy dzieci i żonę!”.
Oficjalne konto animowanej postaci Lofi Girl, która od 2017 roku „uczy się” non-stop na YouTube, zażartowało: „Wygląda na to, że faktycznie skończę studia przed premierą GTA 6”.
Wielu fanów podeszło jednak do sprawy ze zrozumieniem, twierdząc, że wolą poczekać dłużej na dopracowany produkt niż otrzymać niedokończoną grę.
Perfekcjonizm, zwolnienia i rekordowe koszty
Rockstar jest znany ze swojego perfekcjonizmu i notorycznego opóźniania premier. Ich poprzedni wielki hit, Red Dead Redemption 2, również zaliczył roczne opóźnienie względem pierwotnej daty.
Ogłoszenie zbiega się jednak w czasie z niepokojącymi doniesieniami. 30 października z brytyjskich studiów Rockstara zwolniono 31 pracowników. Reprezentujący ich związek zawodowy (IWGB) oskarżył firmę o celowe zwalnianie ludzi, aby powstrzymać ich przed zrzeszaniem się.
Kiedy GTA 6 w końcu trafi na rynek, będzie prawdopodobnie jedną z najdroższych gier w historii. Oczekuje się również, że pobije wszelkie rekordy sprzedaży w dniu premiery. Gra ma zabrać nas do Leonidy (fikcyjnej Florydy) i współczesnej wersji Vice City, a fabuła skupi się na parze kochanków i kryminalistów, Lucii i Jasonie.
#gaming #GrandTheftAuto6 #GTA6 #IShowSpeed #Leonida #LofiGirl #news #nowaDataPremiery #opóźnienie #RockstarGames #ViceCity
-
„Lofi Girl skończy studia przed premierą”. GTA 6 ponownie opóźnione
To już oficjalne: na Grand Theft Auto 6 poczekamy jeszcze dłużej. Rockstar Games, twórca najbardziej oczekiwanej gry dekady, ogłosił właśnie drugie opóźnienie premiery.
Nową, ostateczną (miejmy nadzieję) datą jest 19 listopada 2026 roku.
Przypomnijmy, że pierwotnie gra miała ukazać się jesienią 2025 roku. Już raz została przełożona na maj 2026, a teraz wiemy, że i ten termin jest nierealny.
W oficjalnym oświadczeniu Rockstar przeprosił fanów za „dodatkowy czas” oczekiwania i podziękował za cierpliwość. Studio stwierdziło, że potrzebuje dodatkowych miesięcy, aby „dokończyć grę na poziomie dopieszczenia, jakiego fani oczekują i na jaki zasługują”.
„Lofi Girl w końcu skończy studia”
Wieść o kolejnym opóźnieniu tradycyjnie wywołała w internecie mieszankę złości, żartów i, co ciekawe, akceptacji. Poprzednia część serii, GTA 5, ukazała się w 2013 roku i choć ma już 12 lat, dzięki trybowi online wciąż pozostaje gigantycznie popularna.
Popularny streamer IShowSpeed w typowym dla siebie stylu zareagował na newsa podczas transmisji: „Będę miał 50 lat, zanim ta gra wyjdzie. Mogę już mieć wtedy dzieci i żonę!”.
Oficjalne konto animowanej postaci Lofi Girl, która od 2017 roku „uczy się” non-stop na YouTube, zażartowało: „Wygląda na to, że faktycznie skończę studia przed premierą GTA 6”.
Wielu fanów podeszło jednak do sprawy ze zrozumieniem, twierdząc, że wolą poczekać dłużej na dopracowany produkt niż otrzymać niedokończoną grę.
Perfekcjonizm, zwolnienia i rekordowe koszty
Rockstar jest znany ze swojego perfekcjonizmu i notorycznego opóźniania premier. Ich poprzedni wielki hit, Red Dead Redemption 2, również zaliczył roczne opóźnienie względem pierwotnej daty.
Ogłoszenie zbiega się jednak w czasie z niepokojącymi doniesieniami. 30 października z brytyjskich studiów Rockstara zwolniono 31 pracowników. Reprezentujący ich związek zawodowy (IWGB) oskarżył firmę o celowe zwalnianie ludzi, aby powstrzymać ich przed zrzeszaniem się.
Kiedy GTA 6 w końcu trafi na rynek, będzie prawdopodobnie jedną z najdroższych gier w historii. Oczekuje się również, że pobije wszelkie rekordy sprzedaży w dniu premiery. Gra ma zabrać nas do Leonidy (fikcyjnej Florydy) i współczesnej wersji Vice City, a fabuła skupi się na parze kochanków i kryminalistów, Lucii i Jasonie.
#gaming #GrandTheftAuto6 #GTA6 #IShowSpeed #Leonida #LofiGirl #news #nowaDataPremiery #opóźnienie #RockstarGames #ViceCity
-
„Lofi Girl skończy studia przed premierą”. GTA 6 ponownie opóźnione
To już oficjalne: na Grand Theft Auto 6 poczekamy jeszcze dłużej. Rockstar Games, twórca najbardziej oczekiwanej gry dekady, ogłosił właśnie drugie opóźnienie premiery.
Nową, ostateczną (miejmy nadzieję) datą jest 19 listopada 2026 roku.
Przypomnijmy, że pierwotnie gra miała ukazać się jesienią 2025 roku. Już raz została przełożona na maj 2026, a teraz wiemy, że i ten termin jest nierealny.
W oficjalnym oświadczeniu Rockstar przeprosił fanów za „dodatkowy czas” oczekiwania i podziękował za cierpliwość. Studio stwierdziło, że potrzebuje dodatkowych miesięcy, aby „dokończyć grę na poziomie dopieszczenia, jakiego fani oczekują i na jaki zasługują”.
„Lofi Girl w końcu skończy studia”
Wieść o kolejnym opóźnieniu tradycyjnie wywołała w internecie mieszankę złości, żartów i, co ciekawe, akceptacji. Poprzednia część serii, GTA 5, ukazała się w 2013 roku i choć ma już 12 lat, dzięki trybowi online wciąż pozostaje gigantycznie popularna.
Popularny streamer IShowSpeed w typowym dla siebie stylu zareagował na newsa podczas transmisji: „Będę miał 50 lat, zanim ta gra wyjdzie. Mogę już mieć wtedy dzieci i żonę!”.
Oficjalne konto animowanej postaci Lofi Girl, która od 2017 roku „uczy się” non-stop na YouTube, zażartowało: „Wygląda na to, że faktycznie skończę studia przed premierą GTA 6”.
Wielu fanów podeszło jednak do sprawy ze zrozumieniem, twierdząc, że wolą poczekać dłużej na dopracowany produkt niż otrzymać niedokończoną grę.
Perfekcjonizm, zwolnienia i rekordowe koszty
Rockstar jest znany ze swojego perfekcjonizmu i notorycznego opóźniania premier. Ich poprzedni wielki hit, Red Dead Redemption 2, również zaliczył roczne opóźnienie względem pierwotnej daty.
Ogłoszenie zbiega się jednak w czasie z niepokojącymi doniesieniami. 30 października z brytyjskich studiów Rockstara zwolniono 31 pracowników. Reprezentujący ich związek zawodowy (IWGB) oskarżył firmę o celowe zwalnianie ludzi, aby powstrzymać ich przed zrzeszaniem się.
Kiedy GTA 6 w końcu trafi na rynek, będzie prawdopodobnie jedną z najdroższych gier w historii. Oczekuje się również, że pobije wszelkie rekordy sprzedaży w dniu premiery. Gra ma zabrać nas do Leonidy (fikcyjnej Florydy) i współczesnej wersji Vice City, a fabuła skupi się na parze kochanków i kryminalistów, Lucii i Jasonie.
#gaming #GrandTheftAuto6 #GTA6 #IShowSpeed #Leonida #LofiGirl #news #nowaDataPremiery #opóźnienie #RockstarGames #ViceCity
-
🌐 Join us at Wikirate's SDG-focused hack day on #opendataday 06.03 in #Berlin
Let's uncover how German companies measure up on the #SDG scale🔎📊 Be part of this impactful event and contribute your skills for a sustainable future.
RSVP➡️ http://tinyurl.com/yyaj95jf
-
🌟 #Berlin, join us on March 6, for the #Wikirate SDG Hackathon, part of the #ODD24 where we're diving deep into the world of sustainability and #OpenData✨ Let's hack for a better world, together. 🚀💻🌈
Info & free tickets:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/business-open-sdgs-data-a-hack-day-tickets-824004909867 -
🌟 Calling all Wikirate users! 🌎✨ Help us shape the future of #Wikirate by sharing your insights. If you have ever used the platform, take our quick 3-minute anonymous survey to tell us about your background, needs, and feedback. Your input matters! 🙌📊 https://t.co/X5wdyO1kf1
-
🚀 TODAY #WikiRate is celebrating its public #launch after a successful beta phase.
Along with the 1.0 launch, we've got a fresh #newlook: slick icons, bold colors, and a killer logo!
Check it out at https://wikirate.org and share your thoughts with me below.
#productlaunch #opendata #opensource #companydata #corporateaccountability #transparency #wiki #community #sdgs #esg #api #opendataset #teaching #crowdresearch #supplychaintransparency #companyreports #modernslaveryact #openclimatedata
-
Attention Parisians 🇫🇷:
On 2 March, at 18:30 hrs., participate in a #datathon using WikiRate to collectively research and collect data from the 120 largest French-listed companies.
#ODD2023 #InternationalOpenDataDay.
More info-> https://tinyurl.com/mujabut5 -
So, I am part of #WikiRate, a collaborative community advocating for making companies' #ESG data transparent, useful & available to all + we are #opensource!
Learn more about it here: https://wikirate.medium.com/what-is-wikirate-2b57a34faea3 -
Check out the @WikiRate #API wrappers now available in #Java and #Ruby + an updated version of the #Python wrapper)👇🏾 #opendata #companydata #opensource
https://wikirate.medium.com/new-wrappers-released-for-wikirates-rest-api-in-java-and-ruby-a0e59c95e038 -
🚀 TODAY #WikiRate is celebrating its public #launch after a successful beta phase.
Along with the 1.0 launch, we've got a fresh #newlook: slick icons, bold colors, and a killer logo!
Check it out at https://wikirate.org and share your thoughts with me below.
#productlaunch #opendata #opensource #companydata #corporateaccountability #transparency #wiki #community #sdgs #esg #api #opendataset #teaching #crowdresearch #supplychaintransparency #companyreports #modernslaveryact #openclimatedata
-
🚀 TODAY #WikiRate is celebrating its public #launch after a successful beta phase.
Along with the 1.0 launch, we've got a fresh #newlook: slick icons, bold colors, and a killer logo!
Check it out at https://wikirate.org and share your thoughts with me below.
#productlaunch #opendata #opensource #companydata #corporateaccountability #transparency #wiki #community #sdgs #esg #api #opendataset #teaching #crowdresearch #supplychaintransparency #companyreports #modernslaveryact #openclimatedata
-
🚀 TODAY #WikiRate is celebrating its public #launch after a successful beta phase.
Along with the 1.0 launch, we've got a fresh #newlook: slick icons, bold colors, and a killer logo!
Check it out at https://wikirate.org and share your thoughts with me below.
#productlaunch #opendata #opensource #companydata #corporateaccountability #transparency #wiki #community #sdgs #esg #api #opendataset #teaching #crowdresearch #supplychaintransparency #companyreports #modernslaveryact #openclimatedata
-
🚀 TODAY #WikiRate is celebrating its public #launch after a successful beta phase.
Along with the 1.0 launch, we've got a fresh #newlook: slick icons, bold colors, and a killer logo!
Check it out at https://wikirate.org and share your thoughts with me below.
#productlaunch #opendata #opensource #companydata #corporateaccountability #transparency #wiki #community #sdgs #esg #api #opendataset #teaching #crowdresearch #supplychaintransparency #companyreports #modernslaveryact #openclimatedata
-
Exciting news! @WikiRate is #HIRINGNOW for a full-stack developer. Join my team and help us make a positive impact. Berlin-based preferred, but remote work can be considered. Learn more in the link below #TechJobs #BerlinJobs #RemoteWork" https://www.tbd.community/en/full-stack-developer-mfd
-
Cannabis Lies Vol. 9: The Reform Lie
Filed Under: Policy Fiction
The federal apparatus has spoken. The Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration have announced a shift in the regulatory status of cannabis, moving state-licensed medical products to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act while pointedly leaving adult use, unlicensed, and synthetic THC products in Schedule I. Headlines across the country erupted with the language of victory. Outlets hailed this as a historic acknowledgment of the plant’s medical utility, a shift that supposedly recognizes the plant’s reality after decades of denial. The public was told that the prohibition era was entering its twilight and that the federal government had finally conceded that the plant possesses medicinal value.
None of this reflects the actual legal impact of the order. This announcement is the latest manifestation of the Reform Lie. It is a calculated piece of bureaucratic maintenance designed to satisfy the demand for progress while ensuring the core structure of prohibition remains entirely untouched. As Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche stated in the order, the new policy mandates that:
“Marijuana in any form covered by a state medical marijuana license, be placed in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act.”
It is a classic maneuver by the state to preserve its authority by offering a small, controlled concession that changes everything on paper but leaves the reality of the drug war exactly where it has always been.
The Reform Lie is the mechanism by which the state manages the tension between popular opinion and its own mandate. It functions by acknowledging that a substance has medical value without ever addressing the fundamental injustice of its criminalization. When the government moves a substance from one box to another, it claims it is following the science. When that same government keeps the prisons full, keeps the borders militarized against possession, and keeps the threat of federal intervention hanging over every state-sanctioned interaction, it is not following science. It is managing optics. For decades, the apparatus has faced growing pressure to address the disconnect between federal law and the public reality of cannabis use. Instead of dismantling the structure, the government has repeatedly opted for symbolic reform. These gestures generate cycles of positive press. They allow officials to claim they have acted on the issue. They provide a release valve for public anger without ever sacrificing the underlying authority to arrest, prosecute, and punish. This is the central trick. The Reform Lie presents a change in tax status as a change in morality.
To understand the scope of this deception, one must look closely at what the shift to Schedule III actually achieves. Under the Controlled Substances Act, Schedule III is home to substances such as anabolic steroids and certain prescription painkillers. It is a designation that implies a potential for abuse, though one that the state deems less severe than those in the Schedule I category, which the government defines as having no currently accepted medical use. Moving state-licensed medical products to Schedule III finally acknowledges what has been true for thousands of years. It acknowledges that the plant has medical value.
However, the change in classification does nothing to address the core conflicts of the prohibition era. The federal criminal penalties for the unauthorized production, distribution, or possession of cannabis remain firmly in place for everything outside that narrow, state-sanctioned medical window. The interstate commerce ban survives completely intact. The government continues to treat the transport of the plant across state lines as a federal crime, regardless of the legality of the substance in the states of origin or destination. Banking remains a fractured landscape of private risk and federal oversight. Employment in the federal sector remains hostile to users, and the firearm restrictions that strip rights from medical patients do not budge.
Most critically, this move provides no relief for those currently held in the carceral system. This order structurally excludes any mechanism for record relief, sentence modification, or pardon, leaving the carceral status quo entirely intact. It does not vacate criminal records. It does not end the status of cannabis as a tool for immigration enforcement. It does not stop the random, localized harassment of the population by federal agencies that still view the plant as contraband outside of the narrow, state-licensed framework.
This is a victory for the balance sheet. It is a win for the corporations that have spent millions lobbying for the ability to deduct ordinary business expenses under the tax code. As of April 22, 2026, state-licensed medical cannabis is no longer subject to 280E. It is a stabilization for the industry that the government has deemed acceptable. For the average person, for the patient, and for the citizen who does not operate within the protective bubble of a state-licensed medical program, the reality remains frozen in the past. This bifurcation of the population is intentional. It creates a system where legitimacy is not a right inherent to the citizen. It is a commodity to be licensed. The people who work within the sanctioned industry are protected, taxed, and monitored. The people who exist outside of that bubble, who grow their own, who share, or who live in states without functional medical programs, are left to the mercy of a law that has not changed. The government has not legalized the plant. It has simply professionalized the privilege of interacting with it.
This strategy is not new. It follows a consistent historical pattern. In every generation, the state has used cannabis policy as a messaging tool to address shifting cultural demands. This is not about the plant. It is about the maintenance of control. The lineage of this deception is long and well-documented.
Consider the era of the Gateway Lie. The government needed a way to justify the expansion of its police power, so it framed the plant as the first step on a path to hard drug use. This narrative was never about safety. It was about creating a bridge between a benign cultural habit and the perceived chaos of the heroin epidemic. It gave law enforcement a justification to monitor, harass, and incarcerate individuals who were otherwise peaceful. The Gateway Lie was effective because it operated on fear. It suggested that a single act of consumption was a moral failing that would lead inevitably to destruction.
Consider the Crime Lie, where the plant was the supposed accelerant for violence. In the 1980s and 1990s, the state pivoted to a narrative of aggression. It claimed that cannabis use caused psychosis and fueled the drug trade. It used this narrative to justify the militarization of police forces, the introduction of civil asset forfeiture, and the explosion of the prison population. The Crime Lie turned the consumer into a danger to the public, a threat that had to be neutralized by the full weight of the judicial system. It was never about the drug. It was about the expansion of the carceral state.
Consider the Teen Epidemic Lie, where the narrative focused on the alleged destruction of youth, or the Addiction Lie, which served to pathologize a human relationship with a plant. Each of these lies served a purpose. They provided the state with the moral cover required to expand surveillance, increase budgets, and exert control. The Reform Lie is simply the modern evolution of this pattern. The state no longer needs to argue that the plant causes violence, because the public no longer believes it. So, the state shifts the narrative. It pivots to the language of regulation. It claims to be fixing the system. It is a retreat, but it is a managed retreat. The goal remains the same, which is to maintain the state’s position as the final arbiter of what a person can put into their own body.
The most devastating impact of the Reform Lie is the erasure of the human cost. When the headlines celebrate a minor technical shift, they drown out the voices of those who continue to suffer under the full weight of prohibition. The Reform Lie tells the prisoner that their incarceration is necessary because they did not have the right paperwork. It tells the immigrant that their status remains precarious because the federal law still views the plant as an illicit substance. It tells the veteran that they must choose between their medical treatment and their access to federal services. It tells the small grower that they are a criminal while the corporate entity next door is a taxpayer. By focusing on the tax status of corporations, the conversation ignores the individuals who are still being processed through the system. It creates an environment where progress is measured by market capitalization rather than the restoration of liberty. It turns the struggle for sovereignty into a fight for market share.
Help Keep Pot Culture Magazine Independent Pot Culture Magazine is independent cannabis journalism. No corporate owners. No investors. Just readers. If you value this work, chip in a few dollars and help keep it going. Support PCMIf the government acknowledges that cannabis has medical value, the continued maintenance of criminal penalties for everyone else becomes an indefensible moral contradiction. One cannot simultaneously argue that a substance is legitimate medicine and that the possession of that substance warrants the stripping of rights, the loss of employment, or the threat of prison. This contradiction exposes the truth of the state position. The government does not actually care about the safety of the substance. It cares about the control of the substance. If it were about safety, the state would be looking for ways to educate rather than incarcerate. If it were about medicine, the state would be ensuring access rather than creating barriers. The existence of the prohibition machinery alongside the admission of medical utility for the licensed few is proof that the objective has always been to maintain a system of punishment.
This system relies on the compliance of the public. It relies on the belief that the state is making progress. The Reform Lie is designed to prevent the public from seeing that the state is not moving toward freedom. It is moving toward an integrated model of control. By allowing a portion of the market to become legitimate, the state creates a vested interest in the status quo. The corporate entities that now have a seat at the table are no longer incentivized to fight for total legalization. They are incentivized to maintain the current regulatory structure because it keeps their competitors out. They become partners in the enforcement of the very prohibition they once railed against. This is the ultimate victory for the state. It co-opts the opposition by giving them a slice of the profit.
We have seen this happen in other sectors of the economy, where regulations are written by the very corporations they are meant to govern. This is not reform. This is the capture of the regulatory apparatus. The Reform Lie ensures that the people who built the culture, who fought for the plant when it was dangerous to do so, are excluded from the new order. They are the ones who bear the cost of the transition. They are the ones who are still in cages, who are still fleeing from the law, who are still fighting for the right to exist in peace.
This administrative process is now set to continue with new hearings starting June 29, 2026. These proceedings are often portrayed as a necessary step toward further reform, a way to build a bureaucratic consensus for future changes. In practice, they serve as a stalling tactic. They provide a way for the administrative state to maintain the illusion of progress while keeping the ultimate authority firmly in its own hands. These hearings will involve experts, lobbyists, and officials debating the minutiae of regulation, all while the fundamental structure of the Controlled Substances Act remains unassailable. The system is designed to consume time, resources, and energy, ensuring that any real change is mediated through a process that the state can control, slow, or halt entirely. It is a theatre of governance, performed for an audience that is desperate for change, but the script was written in the halls of power, not by the people who have lived the consequences of prohibition.
MORE FROM CANNABIS LIES
CANNABIS LIES Vol. 8: The Addiction Lie
Cannabis is often labeled addictive, but the science tells a more precise story. This piece breaks down cannabis use disorder, how it is defined, and why mild, moderate, and severe cases get flattened into one fear-driven narrative. The result is a distorted public understanding of risk that fuels policy, perception, and misinformation.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 11, 2026April 20, 2026CANNABIS LIES Vol. 7: The Mental Health Panic
Cannabis and mental health risks are often overstated in public debate. Research shows heavy use and high THC exposure can increase psychosis risk in vulnerable individuals, but widespread claims of a mental health crisis lack strong evidence. This piece examines the data, separates correlation from causation, and breaks down what cannabis users need to know.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 4, 2026April 2, 2026CANNABIS LIES Vol. 6: The Driving Apocalypse Lie
Legal cannabis is often blamed for rising traffic deaths, but federal data tells a more complicated story. NHTSA findings, toxicology limitations, and conflicting crash studies reveal that THC presence is not a reliable measure of impairment. This investigation breaks down how flawed testing and policy shortcuts have shaped the narrative around so-called stoned driving.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsMarch 28, 2026March 27, 2026The administrative state is also moving to consolidate its control over clinical trials. By creating a registration pathway for state-licensed entities, the government is essentially seizing control of the research process. It is setting itself up as the gatekeeper of scientific knowledge. It will dictate who can research the plant, what they can research, and what the results can be used for. This is not an opening of the doors to scientific discovery. It is the enclosure of the scientific commons. It ensures that the research that reaches the public will be the research that has been filtered through the priorities of the state.
The Reform Lie is not a strategy. It is an admission of failure. When the government chooses to perform the act of reform without embracing the reality of justice, it proves that it is not interested in the truth. It is interested in the maintenance of power. True reform would not be a shuffling of schedules. It would be the total and unconditional withdrawal of federal interference from the lives of the people. It would be the recognition that the state has no authority to criminalize the relationship between a human being and a plant. It would be the end of the prohibition machine, the release of the prisoners, and the restoration of rights for every person affected by the war on the plant.
As long as the apparatus continues to frame these technical shifts as moral victories, the public must recognize the deception. This is not progress. This is the state recalibrating its control to ensure that it remains the gatekeeper, the tax collector, and the final judge of who is allowed to exist in the world it seeks to dominate. The plant remains the same. The people remain the same. The only thing that has shifted is the label on the cage. The cage is still there. The bars are still locked. The guards are still watching. The power to punish, to threaten, and to control has not been removed. It has been refined. It has been made more surgical. It has been made more efficient.
The moral weight of this lie is heavy. It falls on those who have been promised justice and received only a change in terminology. It falls on the families who have been broken by the enforcement of archaic laws. It falls on the communities that have been targeted for generations. The Reform Lie assumes that the public has forgotten the history of the struggle. It assumes that the public is satisfied with the crumbs of corporate legitimacy. It assumes that there is no understanding of the difference between the freedom to live and the permission to serve.
The narrative of the state must be rejected. The recognition must grow that every small step that leaves the core structure of the prohibition machine in place is a step away from justice. The government must be held accountable for the contradiction of its own law. The reality of the prohibition era must continue to be documented, to expose the lies that are told to justify the control, and to advocate for the total restoration of liberty. The struggle for the plant is not a struggle for a change in status. It is a struggle for the soul of the culture. It is a struggle to define what it means to be a free person in a society that seeks to regulate every choice. As NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano noted regarding the order:
“Rescheduling fails to fully harmonize federal marijuana policy with the cannabis laws of many states, particularly the 24 states that have legalized its use and sale to adults.”
This is the core of the deception. The Reform Lie is the latest barrier to that freedom. It is a wall that must be dismantled, not by the government, but by the people who have lived the reality of the struggle.
The truth is simple, though the state works hard to obscure it. Cannabis is a part of the human experience. It has been used for healing, for creativity, for connection, and for joy for as long as historical records exist. The attempts by the state to control this relationship are an affront to human autonomy. They are based on fear, on ignorance, and on a desire for power. The reclassification to Schedule III is just the latest tactic in a long campaign to prevent people from fully embracing their own sovereignty. While the proponents of this move claim that:
“Today’s order marks a historical reversal in federal cannabis policy,”
It is a sign that the state is feeling the pressure, that it knows its position is untenable, but that it is not yet ready to concede.
A crossroads has been reached. Either the crumbs offered by the state are accepted, turning the public into participants in their own regulation, or the fight for the total and unconditional end of the prohibition machine continues. The Reform Lie can be accepted, or the truth can be demanded. The history of the culture is a history of resistance. It is a history of people who refused to be told what they could do, who they could be, or what they could consume. That history is the source of strength. It is the foundation upon which the future will be built. Permission from the state is not required to exist. Schedules, labels, and tax codes are not needed to define what is right. The truth is known, and it will continue to be shared until the last cage is empty and the prohibition machine is nothing but a memory.
The Reform Lie will continue to be told. The headlines will continue to scream about progress that does not exist. The state will continue to frame its maintenance of power as a move toward justice. But the deception will not hold. The patterns are visible. The history is known. The stakes are understood. The reality of the prohibition era will be documented, one article, one story, one voice at a time. This is not just a battle for a plant. It is a battle for the truth. And it is a battle that will be won, not because the state gives permission, but because the truth is on the side of the people. The prohibition machine is built on lies, and lies cannot stand forever against the weight of reality. The end of prohibition is coming, not through the actions of the state, but through the resolve of the people who have been fighting for it all along. The Reform Lie is the last gasp of a system that knows its time is over. We will not be fooled. We will not be silenced. We will be here, documenting the reality, telling the truth, and fighting for the culture until the day the plant is free.
©2026, Pot Culture Magazine. All rights reserved. This is the property of Pot Culture Magazine and is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or transmission
of this work, in part or in whole, without the express written permission of Pot Culture Magazine, is strictly
prohibited.F O R T H E C U L T U R E B Y T H E C U L T U R E
The Digital Cage: Saint Lucia’s Traceability Trap
Saint Lucia has selected GrowerIQ as its national seed-to-sale traceability backbone, effectively finalizing a digital surveillance grid for its cannabis industry. By mandating enterprise software before establishing licensing frameworks, the government risks automating the exclusion of legacy farmers. This move trades cultural sovereignty for state-managed control, turning the cannabis industry into an extension of the…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 23, 2026April 22, 2026Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Virginia Sabotage
Virginia legalized possession, but Governor Abigail Spanberger sabotaged the retail market. By delaying sales until 2027 and gutting equity provisions, the Commonwealth institutionalized a half-legal trap. Consumers now navigate a system that treats possession as a right but supply as a crime, fueling an unchecked illicit market while abandoning promised reform. Spanberger’s public safety rhetoric…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 21, 2026April 20, 20264/20 has been hollowed out by branding, corporate silence, and a culture that forgot its own history. While the industry sells holiday merch, Singapore executed a man for cannabis. The movement that once fought for autonomy now treats the plant like a commodity. This piece examines the cost of that betrayal and the culture left…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 20, 2026April 24, 2026 #280E #AdministrativeLaw #cannabis #CannabisCommunity #CannabisCulture #CannabisCommunity #CarceralState #Culture #DEA #DepartmentOfJustice #DrugWar #FederalGovernment #Industry #Legalization #Marijuana #MarijuanaNews #NORML #Policy #PolicyFiction #PotCultureMagazine #Prohibition #Reform #ScheduleIII #StateSanctioned #Weed -
Cannabis Lies Vol. 9: The Reform Lie
Filed Under: Policy Fiction
The federal apparatus has spoken. The Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration have announced a shift in the regulatory status of cannabis, moving state-licensed medical products to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act while pointedly leaving adult use, unlicensed, and synthetic THC products in Schedule I. Headlines across the country erupted with the language of victory. Outlets hailed this as a historic acknowledgment of the plant’s medical utility, a shift that supposedly recognizes the plant’s reality after decades of denial. The public was told that the prohibition era was entering its twilight and that the federal government had finally conceded that the plant possesses medicinal value.
None of this reflects the actual legal impact of the order. This announcement is the latest manifestation of the Reform Lie. It is a calculated piece of bureaucratic maintenance designed to satisfy the demand for progress while ensuring the core structure of prohibition remains entirely untouched. As Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche stated in the order, the new policy mandates that:
“Marijuana in any form covered by a state medical marijuana license, be placed in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act.”
It is a classic maneuver by the state to preserve its authority by offering a small, controlled concession that changes everything on paper but leaves the reality of the drug war exactly where it has always been.
The Reform Lie is the mechanism by which the state manages the tension between popular opinion and its own mandate. It functions by acknowledging that a substance has medical value without ever addressing the fundamental injustice of its criminalization. When the government moves a substance from one box to another, it claims it is following the science. When that same government keeps the prisons full, keeps the borders militarized against possession, and keeps the threat of federal intervention hanging over every state-sanctioned interaction, it is not following science. It is managing optics. For decades, the apparatus has faced growing pressure to address the disconnect between federal law and the public reality of cannabis use. Instead of dismantling the structure, the government has repeatedly opted for symbolic reform. These gestures generate cycles of positive press. They allow officials to claim they have acted on the issue. They provide a release valve for public anger without ever sacrificing the underlying authority to arrest, prosecute, and punish. This is the central trick. The Reform Lie presents a change in tax status as a change in morality.
To understand the scope of this deception, one must look closely at what the shift to Schedule III actually achieves. Under the Controlled Substances Act, Schedule III is home to substances such as anabolic steroids and certain prescription painkillers. It is a designation that implies a potential for abuse, though one that the state deems less severe than those in the Schedule I category, which the government defines as having no currently accepted medical use. Moving state-licensed medical products to Schedule III finally acknowledges what has been true for thousands of years. It acknowledges that the plant has medical value.
However, the change in classification does nothing to address the core conflicts of the prohibition era. The federal criminal penalties for the unauthorized production, distribution, or possession of cannabis remain firmly in place for everything outside that narrow, state-sanctioned medical window. The interstate commerce ban survives completely intact. The government continues to treat the transport of the plant across state lines as a federal crime, regardless of the legality of the substance in the states of origin or destination. Banking remains a fractured landscape of private risk and federal oversight. Employment in the federal sector remains hostile to users, and the firearm restrictions that strip rights from medical patients do not budge.
Most critically, this move provides no relief for those currently held in the carceral system. This order structurally excludes any mechanism for record relief, sentence modification, or pardon, leaving the carceral status quo entirely intact. It does not vacate criminal records. It does not end the status of cannabis as a tool for immigration enforcement. It does not stop the random, localized harassment of the population by federal agencies that still view the plant as contraband outside of the narrow, state-licensed framework.
This is a victory for the balance sheet. It is a win for the corporations that have spent millions lobbying for the ability to deduct ordinary business expenses under the tax code. As of April 22, 2026, state-licensed medical cannabis is no longer subject to 280E. It is a stabilization for the industry that the government has deemed acceptable. For the average person, for the patient, and for the citizen who does not operate within the protective bubble of a state-licensed medical program, the reality remains frozen in the past. This bifurcation of the population is intentional. It creates a system where legitimacy is not a right inherent to the citizen. It is a commodity to be licensed. The people who work within the sanctioned industry are protected, taxed, and monitored. The people who exist outside of that bubble, who grow their own, who share, or who live in states without functional medical programs, are left to the mercy of a law that has not changed. The government has not legalized the plant. It has simply professionalized the privilege of interacting with it.
This strategy is not new. It follows a consistent historical pattern. In every generation, the state has used cannabis policy as a messaging tool to address shifting cultural demands. This is not about the plant. It is about the maintenance of control. The lineage of this deception is long and well-documented.
Consider the era of the Gateway Lie. The government needed a way to justify the expansion of its police power, so it framed the plant as the first step on a path to hard drug use. This narrative was never about safety. It was about creating a bridge between a benign cultural habit and the perceived chaos of the heroin epidemic. It gave law enforcement a justification to monitor, harass, and incarcerate individuals who were otherwise peaceful. The Gateway Lie was effective because it operated on fear. It suggested that a single act of consumption was a moral failing that would lead inevitably to destruction.
Consider the Crime Lie, where the plant was the supposed accelerant for violence. In the 1980s and 1990s, the state pivoted to a narrative of aggression. It claimed that cannabis use caused psychosis and fueled the drug trade. It used this narrative to justify the militarization of police forces, the introduction of civil asset forfeiture, and the explosion of the prison population. The Crime Lie turned the consumer into a danger to the public, a threat that had to be neutralized by the full weight of the judicial system. It was never about the drug. It was about the expansion of the carceral state.
Consider the Teen Epidemic Lie, where the narrative focused on the alleged destruction of youth, or the Addiction Lie, which served to pathologize a human relationship with a plant. Each of these lies served a purpose. They provided the state with the moral cover required to expand surveillance, increase budgets, and exert control. The Reform Lie is simply the modern evolution of this pattern. The state no longer needs to argue that the plant causes violence, because the public no longer believes it. So, the state shifts the narrative. It pivots to the language of regulation. It claims to be fixing the system. It is a retreat, but it is a managed retreat. The goal remains the same, which is to maintain the state’s position as the final arbiter of what a person can put into their own body.
The most devastating impact of the Reform Lie is the erasure of the human cost. When the headlines celebrate a minor technical shift, they drown out the voices of those who continue to suffer under the full weight of prohibition. The Reform Lie tells the prisoner that their incarceration is necessary because they did not have the right paperwork. It tells the immigrant that their status remains precarious because the federal law still views the plant as an illicit substance. It tells the veteran that they must choose between their medical treatment and their access to federal services. It tells the small grower that they are a criminal while the corporate entity next door is a taxpayer. By focusing on the tax status of corporations, the conversation ignores the individuals who are still being processed through the system. It creates an environment where progress is measured by market capitalization rather than the restoration of liberty. It turns the struggle for sovereignty into a fight for market share.
Help Keep Pot Culture Magazine Independent Pot Culture Magazine is independent cannabis journalism. No corporate owners. No investors. Just readers. If you value this work, chip in a few dollars and help keep it going. Support PCMIf the government acknowledges that cannabis has medical value, the continued maintenance of criminal penalties for everyone else becomes an indefensible moral contradiction. One cannot simultaneously argue that a substance is legitimate medicine and that the possession of that substance warrants the stripping of rights, the loss of employment, or the threat of prison. This contradiction exposes the truth of the state position. The government does not actually care about the safety of the substance. It cares about the control of the substance. If it were about safety, the state would be looking for ways to educate rather than incarcerate. If it were about medicine, the state would be ensuring access rather than creating barriers. The existence of the prohibition machinery alongside the admission of medical utility for the licensed few is proof that the objective has always been to maintain a system of punishment.
This system relies on the compliance of the public. It relies on the belief that the state is making progress. The Reform Lie is designed to prevent the public from seeing that the state is not moving toward freedom. It is moving toward an integrated model of control. By allowing a portion of the market to become legitimate, the state creates a vested interest in the status quo. The corporate entities that now have a seat at the table are no longer incentivized to fight for total legalization. They are incentivized to maintain the current regulatory structure because it keeps their competitors out. They become partners in the enforcement of the very prohibition they once railed against. This is the ultimate victory for the state. It co-opts the opposition by giving them a slice of the profit.
We have seen this happen in other sectors of the economy, where regulations are written by the very corporations they are meant to govern. This is not reform. This is the capture of the regulatory apparatus. The Reform Lie ensures that the people who built the culture, who fought for the plant when it was dangerous to do so, are excluded from the new order. They are the ones who bear the cost of the transition. They are the ones who are still in cages, who are still fleeing from the law, who are still fighting for the right to exist in peace.
This administrative process is now set to continue with new hearings starting June 29, 2026. These proceedings are often portrayed as a necessary step toward further reform, a way to build a bureaucratic consensus for future changes. In practice, they serve as a stalling tactic. They provide a way for the administrative state to maintain the illusion of progress while keeping the ultimate authority firmly in its own hands. These hearings will involve experts, lobbyists, and officials debating the minutiae of regulation, all while the fundamental structure of the Controlled Substances Act remains unassailable. The system is designed to consume time, resources, and energy, ensuring that any real change is mediated through a process that the state can control, slow, or halt entirely. It is a theatre of governance, performed for an audience that is desperate for change, but the script was written in the halls of power, not by the people who have lived the consequences of prohibition.
MORE FROM CANNABIS LIES
CANNABIS LIES Vol. 8: The Addiction Lie
Cannabis is often labeled addictive, but the science tells a more precise story. This piece breaks down cannabis use disorder, how it is defined, and why mild, moderate, and severe cases get flattened into one fear-driven narrative. The result is a distorted public understanding of risk that fuels policy, perception, and misinformation.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 11, 2026April 20, 2026CANNABIS LIES Vol. 7: The Mental Health Panic
Cannabis and mental health risks are often overstated in public debate. Research shows heavy use and high THC exposure can increase psychosis risk in vulnerable individuals, but widespread claims of a mental health crisis lack strong evidence. This piece examines the data, separates correlation from causation, and breaks down what cannabis users need to know.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 4, 2026April 2, 2026CANNABIS LIES Vol. 6: The Driving Apocalypse Lie
Legal cannabis is often blamed for rising traffic deaths, but federal data tells a more complicated story. NHTSA findings, toxicology limitations, and conflicting crash studies reveal that THC presence is not a reliable measure of impairment. This investigation breaks down how flawed testing and policy shortcuts have shaped the narrative around so-called stoned driving.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsMarch 28, 2026March 27, 2026The administrative state is also moving to consolidate its control over clinical trials. By creating a registration pathway for state-licensed entities, the government is essentially seizing control of the research process. It is setting itself up as the gatekeeper of scientific knowledge. It will dictate who can research the plant, what they can research, and what the results can be used for. This is not an opening of the doors to scientific discovery. It is the enclosure of the scientific commons. It ensures that the research that reaches the public will be the research that has been filtered through the priorities of the state.
The Reform Lie is not a strategy. It is an admission of failure. When the government chooses to perform the act of reform without embracing the reality of justice, it proves that it is not interested in the truth. It is interested in the maintenance of power. True reform would not be a shuffling of schedules. It would be the total and unconditional withdrawal of federal interference from the lives of the people. It would be the recognition that the state has no authority to criminalize the relationship between a human being and a plant. It would be the end of the prohibition machine, the release of the prisoners, and the restoration of rights for every person affected by the war on the plant.
As long as the apparatus continues to frame these technical shifts as moral victories, the public must recognize the deception. This is not progress. This is the state recalibrating its control to ensure that it remains the gatekeeper, the tax collector, and the final judge of who is allowed to exist in the world it seeks to dominate. The plant remains the same. The people remain the same. The only thing that has shifted is the label on the cage. The cage is still there. The bars are still locked. The guards are still watching. The power to punish, to threaten, and to control has not been removed. It has been refined. It has been made more surgical. It has been made more efficient.
The moral weight of this lie is heavy. It falls on those who have been promised justice and received only a change in terminology. It falls on the families who have been broken by the enforcement of archaic laws. It falls on the communities that have been targeted for generations. The Reform Lie assumes that the public has forgotten the history of the struggle. It assumes that the public is satisfied with the crumbs of corporate legitimacy. It assumes that there is no understanding of the difference between the freedom to live and the permission to serve.
The narrative of the state must be rejected. The recognition must grow that every small step that leaves the core structure of the prohibition machine in place is a step away from justice. The government must be held accountable for the contradiction of its own law. The reality of the prohibition era must continue to be documented, to expose the lies that are told to justify the control, and to advocate for the total restoration of liberty. The struggle for the plant is not a struggle for a change in status. It is a struggle for the soul of the culture. It is a struggle to define what it means to be a free person in a society that seeks to regulate every choice. As NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano noted regarding the order:
“Rescheduling fails to fully harmonize federal marijuana policy with the cannabis laws of many states, particularly the 24 states that have legalized its use and sale to adults.”
This is the core of the deception. The Reform Lie is the latest barrier to that freedom. It is a wall that must be dismantled, not by the government, but by the people who have lived the reality of the struggle.
The truth is simple, though the state works hard to obscure it. Cannabis is a part of the human experience. It has been used for healing, for creativity, for connection, and for joy for as long as historical records exist. The attempts by the state to control this relationship are an affront to human autonomy. They are based on fear, on ignorance, and on a desire for power. The reclassification to Schedule III is just the latest tactic in a long campaign to prevent people from fully embracing their own sovereignty. While the proponents of this move claim that:
“Today’s order marks a historical reversal in federal cannabis policy,”
It is a sign that the state is feeling the pressure, that it knows its position is untenable, but that it is not yet ready to concede.
A crossroads has been reached. Either the crumbs offered by the state are accepted, turning the public into participants in their own regulation, or the fight for the total and unconditional end of the prohibition machine continues. The Reform Lie can be accepted, or the truth can be demanded. The history of the culture is a history of resistance. It is a history of people who refused to be told what they could do, who they could be, or what they could consume. That history is the source of strength. It is the foundation upon which the future will be built. Permission from the state is not required to exist. Schedules, labels, and tax codes are not needed to define what is right. The truth is known, and it will continue to be shared until the last cage is empty and the prohibition machine is nothing but a memory.
The Reform Lie will continue to be told. The headlines will continue to scream about progress that does not exist. The state will continue to frame its maintenance of power as a move toward justice. But the deception will not hold. The patterns are visible. The history is known. The stakes are understood. The reality of the prohibition era will be documented, one article, one story, one voice at a time. This is not just a battle for a plant. It is a battle for the truth. And it is a battle that will be won, not because the state gives permission, but because the truth is on the side of the people. The prohibition machine is built on lies, and lies cannot stand forever against the weight of reality. The end of prohibition is coming, not through the actions of the state, but through the resolve of the people who have been fighting for it all along. The Reform Lie is the last gasp of a system that knows its time is over. We will not be fooled. We will not be silenced. We will be here, documenting the reality, telling the truth, and fighting for the culture until the day the plant is free.
©2026, Pot Culture Magazine. All rights reserved. This is the property of Pot Culture Magazine and is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or transmission
of this work, in part or in whole, without the express written permission of Pot Culture Magazine, is strictly
prohibited.F O R T H E C U L T U R E B Y T H E C U L T U R E
The Digital Cage: Saint Lucia’s Traceability Trap
Saint Lucia has selected GrowerIQ as its national seed-to-sale traceability backbone, effectively finalizing a digital surveillance grid for its cannabis industry. By mandating enterprise software before establishing licensing frameworks, the government risks automating the exclusion of legacy farmers. This move trades cultural sovereignty for state-managed control, turning the cannabis industry into an extension of the…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 23, 2026April 22, 2026Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Virginia Sabotage
Virginia legalized possession, but Governor Abigail Spanberger sabotaged the retail market. By delaying sales until 2027 and gutting equity provisions, the Commonwealth institutionalized a half-legal trap. Consumers now navigate a system that treats possession as a right but supply as a crime, fueling an unchecked illicit market while abandoning promised reform. Spanberger’s public safety rhetoric…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 21, 2026April 20, 20264/20 has been hollowed out by branding, corporate silence, and a culture that forgot its own history. While the industry sells holiday merch, Singapore executed a man for cannabis. The movement that once fought for autonomy now treats the plant like a commodity. This piece examines the cost of that betrayal and the culture left…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 20, 2026April 24, 2026 #280E #AdministrativeLaw #cannabis #CannabisCommunity #CannabisCulture #CannabisCommunity #CarceralState #Culture #DEA #DepartmentOfJustice #DrugWar #FederalGovernment #Industry #Legalization #Marijuana #MarijuanaNews #NORML #Policy #PolicyFiction #PotCultureMagazine #Prohibition #Reform #ScheduleIII #StateSanctioned #Weed -
Cannabis Lies Vol. 9: The Reform Lie
Filed Under: Policy Fiction
The federal apparatus has spoken. The Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration have announced a shift in the regulatory status of cannabis, moving state-licensed medical products to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act while pointedly leaving adult use, unlicensed, and synthetic THC products in Schedule I. Headlines across the country erupted with the language of victory. Outlets hailed this as a historic acknowledgment of the plant’s medical utility, a shift that supposedly recognizes the plant’s reality after decades of denial. The public was told that the prohibition era was entering its twilight and that the federal government had finally conceded that the plant possesses medicinal value.
None of this reflects the actual legal impact of the order. This announcement is the latest manifestation of the Reform Lie. It is a calculated piece of bureaucratic maintenance designed to satisfy the demand for progress while ensuring the core structure of prohibition remains entirely untouched. As Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche stated in the order, the new policy mandates that:
“Marijuana in any form covered by a state medical marijuana license, be placed in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act.”
It is a classic maneuver by the state to preserve its authority by offering a small, controlled concession that changes everything on paper but leaves the reality of the drug war exactly where it has always been.
The Reform Lie is the mechanism by which the state manages the tension between popular opinion and its own mandate. It functions by acknowledging that a substance has medical value without ever addressing the fundamental injustice of its criminalization. When the government moves a substance from one box to another, it claims it is following the science. When that same government keeps the prisons full, keeps the borders militarized against possession, and keeps the threat of federal intervention hanging over every state-sanctioned interaction, it is not following science. It is managing optics. For decades, the apparatus has faced growing pressure to address the disconnect between federal law and the public reality of cannabis use. Instead of dismantling the structure, the government has repeatedly opted for symbolic reform. These gestures generate cycles of positive press. They allow officials to claim they have acted on the issue. They provide a release valve for public anger without ever sacrificing the underlying authority to arrest, prosecute, and punish. This is the central trick. The Reform Lie presents a change in tax status as a change in morality.
To understand the scope of this deception, one must look closely at what the shift to Schedule III actually achieves. Under the Controlled Substances Act, Schedule III is home to substances such as anabolic steroids and certain prescription painkillers. It is a designation that implies a potential for abuse, though one that the state deems less severe than those in the Schedule I category, which the government defines as having no currently accepted medical use. Moving state-licensed medical products to Schedule III finally acknowledges what has been true for thousands of years. It acknowledges that the plant has medical value.
However, the change in classification does nothing to address the core conflicts of the prohibition era. The federal criminal penalties for the unauthorized production, distribution, or possession of cannabis remain firmly in place for everything outside that narrow, state-sanctioned medical window. The interstate commerce ban survives completely intact. The government continues to treat the transport of the plant across state lines as a federal crime, regardless of the legality of the substance in the states of origin or destination. Banking remains a fractured landscape of private risk and federal oversight. Employment in the federal sector remains hostile to users, and the firearm restrictions that strip rights from medical patients do not budge.
Most critically, this move provides no relief for those currently held in the carceral system. This order structurally excludes any mechanism for record relief, sentence modification, or pardon, leaving the carceral status quo entirely intact. It does not vacate criminal records. It does not end the status of cannabis as a tool for immigration enforcement. It does not stop the random, localized harassment of the population by federal agencies that still view the plant as contraband outside of the narrow, state-licensed framework.
This is a victory for the balance sheet. It is a win for the corporations that have spent millions lobbying for the ability to deduct ordinary business expenses under the tax code. As of April 22, 2026, state-licensed medical cannabis is no longer subject to 280E. It is a stabilization for the industry that the government has deemed acceptable. For the average person, for the patient, and for the citizen who does not operate within the protective bubble of a state-licensed medical program, the reality remains frozen in the past. This bifurcation of the population is intentional. It creates a system where legitimacy is not a right inherent to the citizen. It is a commodity to be licensed. The people who work within the sanctioned industry are protected, taxed, and monitored. The people who exist outside of that bubble, who grow their own, who share, or who live in states without functional medical programs, are left to the mercy of a law that has not changed. The government has not legalized the plant. It has simply professionalized the privilege of interacting with it.
This strategy is not new. It follows a consistent historical pattern. In every generation, the state has used cannabis policy as a messaging tool to address shifting cultural demands. This is not about the plant. It is about the maintenance of control. The lineage of this deception is long and well-documented.
Consider the era of the Gateway Lie. The government needed a way to justify the expansion of its police power, so it framed the plant as the first step on a path to hard drug use. This narrative was never about safety. It was about creating a bridge between a benign cultural habit and the perceived chaos of the heroin epidemic. It gave law enforcement a justification to monitor, harass, and incarcerate individuals who were otherwise peaceful. The Gateway Lie was effective because it operated on fear. It suggested that a single act of consumption was a moral failing that would lead inevitably to destruction.
Consider the Crime Lie, where the plant was the supposed accelerant for violence. In the 1980s and 1990s, the state pivoted to a narrative of aggression. It claimed that cannabis use caused psychosis and fueled the drug trade. It used this narrative to justify the militarization of police forces, the introduction of civil asset forfeiture, and the explosion of the prison population. The Crime Lie turned the consumer into a danger to the public, a threat that had to be neutralized by the full weight of the judicial system. It was never about the drug. It was about the expansion of the carceral state.
Consider the Teen Epidemic Lie, where the narrative focused on the alleged destruction of youth, or the Addiction Lie, which served to pathologize a human relationship with a plant. Each of these lies served a purpose. They provided the state with the moral cover required to expand surveillance, increase budgets, and exert control. The Reform Lie is simply the modern evolution of this pattern. The state no longer needs to argue that the plant causes violence, because the public no longer believes it. So, the state shifts the narrative. It pivots to the language of regulation. It claims to be fixing the system. It is a retreat, but it is a managed retreat. The goal remains the same, which is to maintain the state’s position as the final arbiter of what a person can put into their own body.
The most devastating impact of the Reform Lie is the erasure of the human cost. When the headlines celebrate a minor technical shift, they drown out the voices of those who continue to suffer under the full weight of prohibition. The Reform Lie tells the prisoner that their incarceration is necessary because they did not have the right paperwork. It tells the immigrant that their status remains precarious because the federal law still views the plant as an illicit substance. It tells the veteran that they must choose between their medical treatment and their access to federal services. It tells the small grower that they are a criminal while the corporate entity next door is a taxpayer. By focusing on the tax status of corporations, the conversation ignores the individuals who are still being processed through the system. It creates an environment where progress is measured by market capitalization rather than the restoration of liberty. It turns the struggle for sovereignty into a fight for market share.
Help Keep Pot Culture Magazine Independent Pot Culture Magazine is independent cannabis journalism. No corporate owners. No investors. Just readers. If you value this work, chip in a few dollars and help keep it going. Support PCMIf the government acknowledges that cannabis has medical value, the continued maintenance of criminal penalties for everyone else becomes an indefensible moral contradiction. One cannot simultaneously argue that a substance is legitimate medicine and that the possession of that substance warrants the stripping of rights, the loss of employment, or the threat of prison. This contradiction exposes the truth of the state position. The government does not actually care about the safety of the substance. It cares about the control of the substance. If it were about safety, the state would be looking for ways to educate rather than incarcerate. If it were about medicine, the state would be ensuring access rather than creating barriers. The existence of the prohibition machinery alongside the admission of medical utility for the licensed few is proof that the objective has always been to maintain a system of punishment.
This system relies on the compliance of the public. It relies on the belief that the state is making progress. The Reform Lie is designed to prevent the public from seeing that the state is not moving toward freedom. It is moving toward an integrated model of control. By allowing a portion of the market to become legitimate, the state creates a vested interest in the status quo. The corporate entities that now have a seat at the table are no longer incentivized to fight for total legalization. They are incentivized to maintain the current regulatory structure because it keeps their competitors out. They become partners in the enforcement of the very prohibition they once railed against. This is the ultimate victory for the state. It co-opts the opposition by giving them a slice of the profit.
We have seen this happen in other sectors of the economy, where regulations are written by the very corporations they are meant to govern. This is not reform. This is the capture of the regulatory apparatus. The Reform Lie ensures that the people who built the culture, who fought for the plant when it was dangerous to do so, are excluded from the new order. They are the ones who bear the cost of the transition. They are the ones who are still in cages, who are still fleeing from the law, who are still fighting for the right to exist in peace.
This administrative process is now set to continue with new hearings starting June 29, 2026. These proceedings are often portrayed as a necessary step toward further reform, a way to build a bureaucratic consensus for future changes. In practice, they serve as a stalling tactic. They provide a way for the administrative state to maintain the illusion of progress while keeping the ultimate authority firmly in its own hands. These hearings will involve experts, lobbyists, and officials debating the minutiae of regulation, all while the fundamental structure of the Controlled Substances Act remains unassailable. The system is designed to consume time, resources, and energy, ensuring that any real change is mediated through a process that the state can control, slow, or halt entirely. It is a theatre of governance, performed for an audience that is desperate for change, but the script was written in the halls of power, not by the people who have lived the consequences of prohibition.
MORE FROM CANNABIS LIES
CANNABIS LIES Vol. 8: The Addiction Lie
Cannabis is often labeled addictive, but the science tells a more precise story. This piece breaks down cannabis use disorder, how it is defined, and why mild, moderate, and severe cases get flattened into one fear-driven narrative. The result is a distorted public understanding of risk that fuels policy, perception, and misinformation.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 11, 2026April 20, 2026CANNABIS LIES Vol. 7: The Mental Health Panic
Cannabis and mental health risks are often overstated in public debate. Research shows heavy use and high THC exposure can increase psychosis risk in vulnerable individuals, but widespread claims of a mental health crisis lack strong evidence. This piece examines the data, separates correlation from causation, and breaks down what cannabis users need to know.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 4, 2026April 2, 2026CANNABIS LIES Vol. 6: The Driving Apocalypse Lie
Legal cannabis is often blamed for rising traffic deaths, but federal data tells a more complicated story. NHTSA findings, toxicology limitations, and conflicting crash studies reveal that THC presence is not a reliable measure of impairment. This investigation breaks down how flawed testing and policy shortcuts have shaped the narrative around so-called stoned driving.
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsMarch 28, 2026March 27, 2026The administrative state is also moving to consolidate its control over clinical trials. By creating a registration pathway for state-licensed entities, the government is essentially seizing control of the research process. It is setting itself up as the gatekeeper of scientific knowledge. It will dictate who can research the plant, what they can research, and what the results can be used for. This is not an opening of the doors to scientific discovery. It is the enclosure of the scientific commons. It ensures that the research that reaches the public will be the research that has been filtered through the priorities of the state.
The Reform Lie is not a strategy. It is an admission of failure. When the government chooses to perform the act of reform without embracing the reality of justice, it proves that it is not interested in the truth. It is interested in the maintenance of power. True reform would not be a shuffling of schedules. It would be the total and unconditional withdrawal of federal interference from the lives of the people. It would be the recognition that the state has no authority to criminalize the relationship between a human being and a plant. It would be the end of the prohibition machine, the release of the prisoners, and the restoration of rights for every person affected by the war on the plant.
As long as the apparatus continues to frame these technical shifts as moral victories, the public must recognize the deception. This is not progress. This is the state recalibrating its control to ensure that it remains the gatekeeper, the tax collector, and the final judge of who is allowed to exist in the world it seeks to dominate. The plant remains the same. The people remain the same. The only thing that has shifted is the label on the cage. The cage is still there. The bars are still locked. The guards are still watching. The power to punish, to threaten, and to control has not been removed. It has been refined. It has been made more surgical. It has been made more efficient.
The moral weight of this lie is heavy. It falls on those who have been promised justice and received only a change in terminology. It falls on the families who have been broken by the enforcement of archaic laws. It falls on the communities that have been targeted for generations. The Reform Lie assumes that the public has forgotten the history of the struggle. It assumes that the public is satisfied with the crumbs of corporate legitimacy. It assumes that there is no understanding of the difference between the freedom to live and the permission to serve.
The narrative of the state must be rejected. The recognition must grow that every small step that leaves the core structure of the prohibition machine in place is a step away from justice. The government must be held accountable for the contradiction of its own law. The reality of the prohibition era must continue to be documented, to expose the lies that are told to justify the control, and to advocate for the total restoration of liberty. The struggle for the plant is not a struggle for a change in status. It is a struggle for the soul of the culture. It is a struggle to define what it means to be a free person in a society that seeks to regulate every choice. As NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano noted regarding the order:
“Rescheduling fails to fully harmonize federal marijuana policy with the cannabis laws of many states, particularly the 24 states that have legalized its use and sale to adults.”
This is the core of the deception. The Reform Lie is the latest barrier to that freedom. It is a wall that must be dismantled, not by the government, but by the people who have lived the reality of the struggle.
The truth is simple, though the state works hard to obscure it. Cannabis is a part of the human experience. It has been used for healing, for creativity, for connection, and for joy for as long as historical records exist. The attempts by the state to control this relationship are an affront to human autonomy. They are based on fear, on ignorance, and on a desire for power. The reclassification to Schedule III is just the latest tactic in a long campaign to prevent people from fully embracing their own sovereignty. While the proponents of this move claim that:
“Today’s order marks a historical reversal in federal cannabis policy,”
It is a sign that the state is feeling the pressure, that it knows its position is untenable, but that it is not yet ready to concede.
A crossroads has been reached. Either the crumbs offered by the state are accepted, turning the public into participants in their own regulation, or the fight for the total and unconditional end of the prohibition machine continues. The Reform Lie can be accepted, or the truth can be demanded. The history of the culture is a history of resistance. It is a history of people who refused to be told what they could do, who they could be, or what they could consume. That history is the source of strength. It is the foundation upon which the future will be built. Permission from the state is not required to exist. Schedules, labels, and tax codes are not needed to define what is right. The truth is known, and it will continue to be shared until the last cage is empty and the prohibition machine is nothing but a memory.
The Reform Lie will continue to be told. The headlines will continue to scream about progress that does not exist. The state will continue to frame its maintenance of power as a move toward justice. But the deception will not hold. The patterns are visible. The history is known. The stakes are understood. The reality of the prohibition era will be documented, one article, one story, one voice at a time. This is not just a battle for a plant. It is a battle for the truth. And it is a battle that will be won, not because the state gives permission, but because the truth is on the side of the people. The prohibition machine is built on lies, and lies cannot stand forever against the weight of reality. The end of prohibition is coming, not through the actions of the state, but through the resolve of the people who have been fighting for it all along. The Reform Lie is the last gasp of a system that knows its time is over. We will not be fooled. We will not be silenced. We will be here, documenting the reality, telling the truth, and fighting for the culture until the day the plant is free.
©2026, Pot Culture Magazine. All rights reserved. This is the property of Pot Culture Magazine and is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or transmission
of this work, in part or in whole, without the express written permission of Pot Culture Magazine, is strictly
prohibited.F O R T H E C U L T U R E B Y T H E C U L T U R E
The Digital Cage: Saint Lucia’s Traceability Trap
Saint Lucia has selected GrowerIQ as its national seed-to-sale traceability backbone, effectively finalizing a digital surveillance grid for its cannabis industry. By mandating enterprise software before establishing licensing frameworks, the government risks automating the exclusion of legacy farmers. This move trades cultural sovereignty for state-managed control, turning the cannabis industry into an extension of the…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 23, 2026April 22, 2026Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Virginia Sabotage
Virginia legalized possession, but Governor Abigail Spanberger sabotaged the retail market. By delaying sales until 2027 and gutting equity provisions, the Commonwealth institutionalized a half-legal trap. Consumers now navigate a system that treats possession as a right but supply as a crime, fueling an unchecked illicit market while abandoning promised reform. Spanberger’s public safety rhetoric…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 21, 2026April 20, 20264/20 has been hollowed out by branding, corporate silence, and a culture that forgot its own history. While the industry sells holiday merch, Singapore executed a man for cannabis. The movement that once fought for autonomy now treats the plant like a commodity. This piece examines the cost of that betrayal and the culture left…
by Pot Culture Magazine EditorsApril 20, 2026April 24, 2026 #280E #AdministrativeLaw #cannabis #CannabisCommunity #CannabisCulture #CannabisCommunity #CarceralState #Culture #DEA #DepartmentOfJustice #DrugWar #FederalGovernment #Industry #Legalization #Marijuana #MarijuanaNews #NORML #Policy #PolicyFiction #PotCultureMagazine #Prohibition #Reform #ScheduleIII #StateSanctioned #Weed -
TrueShort, which makes vertical AI-generated movies broken into one- to three-minute episodes, raised a $12M seed led by Keith Rabois at Khosla Ventures (Lucia Moses/Business Insider)
https://www.businessinsider.com/khosla-ventures-jeffrey-katzenberg-backing-trueshort-ai-vertical-film-app-2026-5
http://mediagazer.com/260514/p10#a260514p10 -
Dimayuga and Tan Rule Under-15 Youth Titles of 2026 Subic Bay International Triathlon
DIEGO Jose Dimayuga of Get Coach’d Academy and Lauren Lee Tan dominated the Subic Bay International Triathlon (SuBIT) U15 Youth category held yesterday at the Subic Bay Freeport Zone.
Dimayuga finished the super sprint race (375m swim, 10km bike and 2.5km run) in 35 minutes and 59 seconds. Teammate Pio Mishael Gabriel (36:31) placed second followed by Cebuano Joseph Ian Caluste of Be Tritans (36:58).
In the girls division, Tan clocked 38:25 to beat Naomi Dimayuga (39:10) and Alaina Bouffaut (40:15) in the event organized by Triathlon Philippines (TriPhil) and supported by Philippine Sports Commission (PSC), the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA), NTT, Gatorade (official hydration partner), Western Guaranty Corporation, C-Vitt and Subic Bay Travelers Hotel (official race hotel).
“I was sick for two weeks, I only had a week to train for this tournament,” said the 15-year-old Dimayuga, who lives in Silang, Cavite.
Diego Jose Dimayuga (right) during the 10-kilometer bike leg at Subic Bay. He emerged victorious in the Under-15 category with a time of 35 minutes and 39 seconds. (photo credit: Rey Nillama) Lauren Lee Tan running on her way to victory during the race. (photo credit: Rey Nillama)Dimayuga, Latonio and Caluste duplicated their performances at the National Age Group Triathlon (NAGT) last February.
Dimayuga, who made it to the national team at the start of the year, will join the Asian Youth Championships in Xuzhou, China next month.
“I’m excited to represent the country and my team (GCA). I’ll do my best to win,” said Dimayuga, a silver medalist at the Asia Triathlon Junior and U23 Championships in Hong Kong last March.
2026 SuBIT Under-15 champions Lauren Lee Tan and Diego Jose Dimayuga posed with their medals. (photo credit Rey Nillama)Meanwhile, Qatari Anes Khelili clocked 1:06:36 to prevail over Jarius Miguel Mejia of De La Salle Zobel Triathlon Team (1:06:38) and Lorenzo Claur of Baguio Benguet Triathlon (1:06:48) in the standard men 16-19 years old category of the event also backed by Milo, Ford, Sante Barley, Gatorade, Western Guaranty Inc., C-vitt, Lemon Square Bakery Treats, Gardenia, Fitbar, Ecotrans and RaceYa.
The Top 3 finishers in the girls division were Naomi Felicity Aytin of BYBS/GAS Coaching (1:23:33), Fynley Quiban (1:25:25) and Keirstein Ann Marie Tigullo (1:27:23).
Champions in the super tri-kids category were Marcus Jayden Balaquit and Danica Mireille Angodung (11-12), Rey Matthew Tundayag and Maiko Aleno (9-10), Ethan Geronimo and Jan Christel Culanag (7-8), and Thirdy Geronimo and Lucia Ysabel Sarmenta (6-under).
The other gold medalists in standard age-group men’s division were Earl James Ting of Be Tritans (20-29), Samuel Ebuen Bada of Olongapo Junior Trackers Multisport (30-39), Raffy Dolor of Artemis-Victory (40-49), John Erich Taca of Team Megawide (50-59), and Diosdado Soriano of BOST (60-over) while in the women’s division were Jan Mikaela Caruncho of 2600 Tri Team (20-29), Sandra Inocillas-Pineda of Sante Barley Tri Team (30-39), Lady Ro Anne Alviar of UPLB Trantados (40-49) and Maria Beatriz Azcuna of Beer Racer Beer (50-over).
For more triathlon and multisport updates, visit https://www.facebook.com/TriPhil.
+++++
Note: This post was sourced from the official press release of the event from Triathlon Philippines.
Thank you for reading. If you find this article engaging, please click the like button below, share this article to others and also please consider making a donation to support my publishing. If you are looking for a copywriter to create content for your special project or business, check out my services and my portfolio. Feel free to contact me with a private message. Also please feel free to visit my Facebook page Author Carlo Carrasco and follow me on Twitter at @CarloCarrascoPH as well as on Tumblr at https://carlocarrasco.tumblr.com/ and on Instagram athttps://www.instagram.com/authorcarlocarrasco
#Asia #athlete #athletes #biking #Bing #Blog #blogger #blogging #CVitt #CarloCarrasco #ChatGPT #cycling #Facebook #Gatorade #geek #Google #GoogleSearch #Instagram #Investagrams #kabataan #NTT #online #onlineRegistration #PhilippineSports #PhilippineSportsCommissionPSC #Philippines #PhilippinesBlog #Pinoy #runBikeRun #running #SBMA #SEAGames #SEAGamesBlog #socialMedia #SoutheastAsia #sports #sportsBlog #sportsCompetition #sportsEvents #sportsNews #SubicBay #SubicBayFreeportZone #SubicBayInternationalTriathlonSUBIT #SubicBayMetropolitanAuthority #SubicBayMetropolitanAuthoritySBMA #SubicBayTravelersHotel #SuBIT #SuperTriKids #swimBikeRun #tourSubicBay #triathlete #triathletes #triathlon #TriathlonAssociationOfThePhilippines #TriathlonAssociationOfThePhilippinesTRAP #triathlonBlog #TriathlonPhilippinesTriPhil #Tumblr #visitSubicBay #WesternGuarantyCorp #WordPress #WordPressCom #youth