home.social

Search

1000 results for “pivot_to_ai_rss_bot”

  1. Meta AI posts your personal chats to a public feed

    Meta’s got a new chatbot app, Meta AI. You can ask it questions in text or voice, much like ChatGPT or Gemini. [Meta] There’s one difference — the other chatbots don’t reveal your conversations to the world. Some maniac at Meta put up a public feed of people chatting to the bot. [Twitter, thread] There’s […]

    pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/14/met
    #Uncategorised #Meta #MetaAI

  2. Kevin O’Leary’s giant Utah data centre: will it happen?
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/05/14/kev]

    Kevin O’Leary is a TV star rich business guy. Not quite a billionaire. He calls himself “Mr. Wonderful.” Everyone loves TV star rich guys, right? O’Leary saw the AI bubble pumping up and he thought: I want in on that. O’Leary found a space in Utah and started buying up land and rights. And he […]

  3. Kim Crawley: Technofascism Survival Guide
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/05/01/kim]

    Today’s Pivot to AI is a podcast interview with Kim Crawley of StopGenAI, who we’ve had on previously, about her book Technofascism Survival Guide, which is coming out in June! [YouTube; podcast] Here’s the kickstarter and here’s Kim’s home page. $5-and-up patrons can also see the original unedited Zoom interview.   

    #AIisGoingGreat #Books #KimCrawley

  4. Associated Press dumps journalists for AI
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/04/07/ass]

    The Associated Press is getting rid of journalists and pivoting a bit more toward AI. It offered 120 journalists a buyout offer on Monday and it wants to cut 5% globally. [AP] The AP ignored a request for discussion from the union, the News Media Guild, last week. AP is worried that newspapers aren’t buying […]

    #AIisGoingGreat #Journalism #AimeeRinehart

  5. Nobody wants OpenAI shares on the secondary market
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/04/03/nob]

    OpenAI wants to do an IPO this year! In the leadup, they’ve completed the $100 billion-ish deal they were working on. The total take is $122 billion, from Amazon, Nvidia, Softbank, and a pile of smaller investors. [Bloomberg, archive] It is, of course, not $122 billion of cash in their hands. It’s $25–30 billion and […]

    #AIisGoingGreat

  6. The AI bubble and the global polycrisis
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/03/27/the]

    The AI bubble is a symptom of our wider economic problems. It’s the last thing masking the bigger systemic issues — so they don’t show up in the macro numbers. Just on the ground. But the US bombed Iran, and Iran shut the supply lines for the world. Whoops. Matteo Wong and Charlie Warzel at […]

    #AIisGoingGreat #Government #Markets #Venturecapital #Iran

  7. BuzzFeed goes AI — then it goes broke
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/03/26/buz]

    BuzzFeed is a website famous for its happy clickbait, listicles and quizzes. It even used to have a top-quality news section, BuzzFeed News! And it’s about to go broke. What happened? AI happened. In December 2022, BuzzFeed CEO and founder Jonah Peretti saw the newly-released ChatGPT — and it one-shotted him: [CNN, archive] Peretti told […]

    #AIisGoingGreat #Journalism

  8. Block’s AI layoffs are fake too
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/03/09/blo]

    Twitter cofounder and ayahuasca beard weirdo Jack Dorsey has a company called Block that does a useful thing — CashApp — and a lot of stupid stuff with bitcoins and so on. On 26 February, Block announced a huge layoff — over 4,000 people, 40% of the company. Morale has been down at Block — […]

    #AIisGoingGreat #Companies #Block #JackDorsey

  9. Insurers don’t want to cover AI
    [Full text: pivot-to-ai.com/2026/01/26/ins]

    AI everywhere is — as you know — the future of business and civilisation! Except your company may have issues insuring against AI causing problems. AIG, Great American, WR Berkley, and other insurers are asking permission from regulators to just … not cover AI. [FT, archive] Berkley wants to exclude: [National Law Review, 2025] any […]

    #AIisGoingGreat #Enterprise #AIG #Anthropic

  10. Open source projects reject AI code over copyright concerns

    I asked a couple of months ago: if AI code was such an obviously superior engineering method, why didn’t we see AI code everywhere in open source? Since then, there have been a few performative AI code pulls in open source projects. They’re generally from competent coders who know what they’re doing — but every […]

    pivot-to-ai.com/2025/07/22/ope
    #Codecompletion

  11. Bad brainwaves: ChatGPT makes you stupid

    In a new study, MIT Media Lab measured 55 people over four months on how well they could write an essay — either with ChatGPT, with a search engine, or just their unassisted brain. The researchers hooked them to an EEG to see which parts of their brains were active or not. [arXiv, PDF] The […]

    pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/16/bad
    #Education #Papers #ChatGPT #MITMediaLab #AIisGoingGreat

  12. Let’s put more AI slop into advertising!

    Facebook is floating AI-generated ad campaigns! You’ll type in your rough ideas and Facebook will generate a small campaign for you, with ad copy and imagery. CEO Mark Zuckerberg says AI advertising is part of his “vision” for the future of Meta. [WSJ, archive] But ad agencies have been trying out generative AI since ChatGPT […]

    pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/03/let
    #Imagegenerators #Facebook #MarkZuckerberg

  13. Google takes AI propaganda to the movies

    Google is very upset that a lot of the public don’t really like AI. You might think this was because of AI slop and explicit threats to their jobs, but Google is pretty sure it’s because people saw the Terminator films. So Google is funding films about how AI is good really. Mira Lang at […]

    pivot-to-ai.com/2025/05/28/goo
    #Imagegenerators #100Zeros #DarrenAronofsky #DeepMind #Google

  14. Destroying Autocracy – July 17, 2025

    Welcome to this week’s “Destroying Autocracy”.

    It’s your source for curated news affecting democracy in the cyber arena with a focus on protecting it. That necessitates an opinionated Butlerian jihad against big tech as well as evangelizing for open-source and the Fediverse. Since big media’s journalism wing is flailing and failing in its core duty to democracy, this is also a collection of alternative reporting on the eternal battle between autocracy and democracy. We also cover the cybersecurity world. You can’t be free without safety and privacy.

    DA comes out on Thursday and is updated through the end of day on Friday. Then we start over. So take your time in perusing it and check back in over the weekend.

    FYI, my opinions will be in bold. And will often involve cursing. Because humans. Especially tech bros. And fascists. Fuck ’em.

    We are back from holiday and brief respite from Fascism Friendly Florida.

    Featured Item

    Hamish Campbell writes:

    Capitalism’s invisible hand has always relied on hidden data. In the digital age, that data is metadata the overlooked, under-the-hood information that tells us who, where, when, how often, and what next. It doesn’t matter what you say or do if someone else controls the context around it. That’s where the power lies. Let’s be clear: the battle for metadata is the battle for the future.

    Capitalism: Metadata is hoarded by the dotcons. This is the tech-feudalism of today—soft fascism in algorithmic form.

    Chinese Communism: Here, the state doesn’t outsource metadata – it owns it. Surveillance is centralised. Social credit systems reduce people to patterns and can be used to penalise deviation.

    Liberalism: Wants to privatise metadata to the individual, to revive the mythical free market of rational actors with perfect information. But this is a fantasy—metadata’s power comes from aggregation, and no individual can match corporate or state capacity to hoard it. The liberal path leads to a slightly less abusive cage.

    Anarchism and the Commons: A Fourth Way

    What does anarchism want? It wants the social conditions for free association. It wants autonomy, not just individual, but community autonomy.

    In commons vs. the market, capitalism uses metadata to target, extract, and sell. We use metadata to share, trust, and build. The Open Media Network proposes a radical shift to replace the market with metadata commons. In capitalism, knowledge is hoarded for advantage. In the commons, it is shared for coordination. The market’s “invisible hand” becomes the commons’ visible knowledge, messy, partial, human, but rooted in mutual aid, not profit.

    Metadata and the OMN Path: Who Controls the Invisible Hand?

    We start and end with good news to make the middle bearable.

    The response to Russia’s War Crimes, Techno Feudalism, and other douchebaggery

    TechCrunch reports:

    Ukrainian hackers claim to have destroyed servers of Russian drone maker

    The Kyiv Independent reports:

    EU slaps new sanctions on Russia over hybrid threats, disinformation

    BleepingComputer reports:

    Europol disrupts pro-Russian NoName057(16) DDoS hacktivist group

    ETH Zurich announces:

    A language model built for the public good

    Open Future reports on:

    Our Work/ Public AI

    It’s FOSS reports:

    Europe on a Roll: Plans Open Source Alternative to Confluence and Jira

    OpenProject shares:

    Empowering the Public Sector with OpenProject: An Open Source alternative for project management

    Bloomberg Law reports:

    States Target AI Hiring Tools as Federal Freeze Attempt Fails

    404 Media has:

    The Open-Source Software Saving the Internet From AI Bot Scrapers

    Immigration Raid Tracking App ‘ICE Block’ Keeps Your Data Private, Researcher Finds

    Open Ice is a new resource:

    OpenIce

    TechPolicy reports:

    States Are Fighting Back To Defend Medical Privacy and Safeguard Democracy

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports:

    Despite Supreme Court Setback, EFF Fights On Against Online Age Mandates

    Neutral

    TechPolicy reports:

    How the EU’s Voluntary AI Code is Testing Industry and Regulators Alike

    Making Media Pluralism Work in the Age of Algorithms

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports:

    EFF’s Guide to Getting Records About Axon’s Draft One AI-Generated Police Reports

    The Evil Empire (AKA Autocracy) Strikes Back

    Platformer reports:

    The campaign to make it illegal for ChatGPT to criticize Trump

    Krebs on Security reports:

    DOGE Denizen Marko Elez Leaked API Key for xAI

    404 Media reports:

    ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Target

    TechPolicy reports:

    The US Just Logged Off from Internet Freedom

    ProPublica has:

    The IRS Is Building a Vast System to Share Millions of Taxpayers’ Data With ICE

    A Little-Known Microsoft Program Could Expose the Defense Department to Chinese Hackers

    Ars Technica reports:

    Trump sues Corporation for Public Broadcasting directors who refused to be fired

    Pariah States

    BleepingComputer reports:

    North Korean XORIndex malware hidden in 67 malicious npm packages

    DarkReading reports:

    China-Backed Salt Typhoon Hacks US National Guard for Nearly a Year

    4 Chinese APTs Attack Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry

    Noyb has:

    How TikTok, AliExpress & WeChat ignore your GDPR rights

    Big Media

    404 Media reports:

    The Media’s Pivot to AI Is Not Real and Not Going to Work

    TechPolicy reports:

    Old Tricks, New Tech: How Legacy Media Capture Fuels Today’s Digital Authoritarianism

    Mediations in an Emergency reports:

    Please Shout Fire. This Theater Is Burning

    Big Tech

    Ars Technica reports:

    New Grok AI model surprises experts by checking Elon Musk’s views before answering

    TechCrunch reports:

    Of course, Grok’s AI companions want to have sex and burn down schools

    OpenAI and Anthropic researchers decry ‘reckless’ safety culture at Elon Musk’s xAI

    The Verge asks:

    Where are the iPhone’s WebKit-less browsers?

    Pluralistic by Cory Doctorow has:

    Where are the iPhone’s WebKit-less browsers?

    404 Media reports:

    a16z-Backed AI Site Civitai Is Mostly Porn, Despite Claiming Otherwise

    The Markup reports:

    AI is helping students be more independent, but the isolation could be career poison

    This times 1,000.

    Terror

    404 Media reports:

    3D Printing Patterns Might Make Ghost Guns More Traceable Than We Thought

    Cybersecurity/Privacy

    Bleeping Computer has:

    Google Gemini flaw hijacks email summaries for phishing

    Malicious VSCode extension in Cursor IDE led to $500K crypto theft

    Sounds like a win-win.

    Police disrupt “Diskstation” ransomware gang attacking NAS devices

    Ars Technica reports:

    Hackers exploit a blind spot by hiding malware inside DNS records

    DarkReading reports:

    Military Veterans May Be What Cybersecurity Is Looking For

    Beats being in the National Guard.

    Women Who ‘Hacked the Status Quo’ Aim to Inspire Cybersecurity Careers

    The Next Web reports:

    Whisper emerges from stealth with ‘God Mode’ to tackle cybercrime

    Fediverse

    Connected Places has:

    Fediverse Report – #125

    Age Verification Laws: Are the New Social Networks Different, Or Not At All?

    Steve Bate has:

    ActivityPub Client API: A Way Forward

    The Social Web Foundation has:

    Seeking interop testing for geosocial ActivityPub client

    Mastodon has:

    Trunk & Tidbits, June 2025

    Privacy Guides has:

    Privacy and Security on Mastodon

    Bandwagon has an update:

    July 2025

    Elena Rossini has:

    My adventures in self-hosting: day 211 (CDN edition)

    Forgejo announces:

    Forgejo v12.0 is available

    TechCrunch reports:

    Meta appoints generative AI VP to run Threads

    I guess it wasn’t shitty enough.

    Slightly Federated Social Media

    Connected Places has:

    Bluesky Report – #125

    Reuters reports:

    European project Eurosky aims to reduce reliance on US tech giants

    CTAs (aka show us some free love)

    • That’s it for this week. Please share this edition of Destroying Autocracy.
    • Follow me on the Fediverse. Or this site via the button in the footer. Or via RSS.

    Keep fighting!

    Ringleader, Battalion
    Reuben Walker
    Follow me on the Fediverse

    #125 #ActivityPub #AI #ATProto #Autocracy #Bandwagon #BigJournalism #BigTech #Bluesky #Democracy #Fascism #Fediverse #Forgejo #Mastodon #StopChina #StopIsrael #StopRedAmerica #StopRussia #SupportUkraine #TechnoAnarchism #TechnoFeudalism #Threads

    battalion.mobileatom.net/?p=21

  15. Destroying Autocracy – December 25, 2025

    Welcome to this week’s “Destroying Autocracy”.

    It’s your source for curated news affecting democracy in the cyber arena with a focus on protecting it. That necessitates an opinionated Butlerian jihad against big tech as well as evangelizing for open-source and the Fediverse. Since big media’s journalism wing is flailing and failing in its core duty to democracy, this is also a collection of alternative reporting on the eternal battle between autocracy and democracy. We also cover the cybersecurity world. You can’t be free without safety and privacy.

    FYI, my opinions will be in bold. And will often involve cursing. Because humans. Especially tech bros. And fascists. Fuck ´em.

    So folks, this is the final edition of Destroying Autocracy. Recently, I ran across a quote that fits with why I ran this project:

    “I am absolutely convinced that only a small minority, a very small minority, among us, are seriously reached and profoundly moved by our propaganda of criticism, of doubt, of rebellion, of free investigation, of independent research. On the other hand, it is clear that our first interest lies always in seeking to increase this minority; to keep it, under all circumstances alive, active, refreshed. Our own happiness depends on it.
    — Emile Armand”

    Thanks for following us. Now, on to what’s next.

    The Programmer’s Fulcrum is now the home for a fusion of Symfony Station and Battalion. Its tagline is Devs Defending Democracy, Destroying Autocracy, and Developing the OMN.

    You can sign up now.

    We are posting on the Fediverse now at @thefulcrum



    Please copy and paste our handle into you favorite client to follow us. Original website content will start next week.

    Featured Item(s)

    I ran across these last week.

    The Resonant Computing Manifesto

    These are principles that should be implementing when developing for the Open Media Network.

    Jan Wideboer writes:

    Over the past few months, I thought a lot about Digital Sovereignty. I talked to experts, from analysts over legal experts to people running companies and public authorities. I tried to distill what is really at the core of the principle.

    OCT – My Framework for Digital Sovereignty, Part 1

    This is a good way to look at it.

    We start and end with good news to make the middle bearable.

    The response to Russia’s War Crimes, Techno Feudalism, and other douchebaggery

    TechCrunch reports:

    Stanford’s star reporter takes on Silicon Valley’s ‘money-soaked’ startup culture

    TechPolicy shares:

    Making the Digital Markets Act Developer-Friendly

    The Guardian reports:

    This is Europe’s secret weapon against Trump: it could burst his AI bubble

    The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action

    MPs question UK Palantir contracts after investigation reveals security concerns

    BleepingComputer reports:

    Italy fines Apple $116 million over App Store privacy policy issues

    Waterfox announces:

    No AI* Here – A Response to Mozilla’s Next Chapter

    The Register notes:

    Waterfox browser goes AI-free, targets the Firefox faithful

    You don’t need Linux to run free and open source software

    This is one you should read and take action on. 🙂

    Airbus to migrate critical apps to a sovereign Euro cloud

    Europe gets serious about cutting digital umbilical cord with Uncle Sam’s big tech

    It’s FOSS reports:

    Denmark Begins its Exit from Microsoft — and This is Just the Beginning

    At least the enemies of privacy are slowly telling Microsoft to fuck off.

    NextCloud shares:

    The Republic of Serbia deploys Nextcloud for compliant, on-premises collaboration

    Robert Riemann asks:

    EU OS: Which Linux Distribution fits Europe best?

    Hamish Campbell asks:

    What Did We Learn from Web3, Crypto?

    Signal has:

    This was 2025 for Signal: strong growth and many new features

    CoMaps shares:

    CoMaps and its community at the end of 2025

    Neutral

    The Center for Democracy and Technology has:

    To AI or Not To AI: A Practice Guide for Public Agencies to Decide Whether to Proceed with Artificial Intelligence

    TechPolicy Press reports:

    The Path to a Sovereign Tech Stack is Via a Commodified Tech Stack

    Platforms Report to EU Regulators Under DSA With an Eye on US Politics

    Europe Tried to Take Control of Its Digital Stack in 2025. Where Does It Stand Now?

    The Evil Empire (AKA Autocracy) Strikes Back

    Krebs on Security reports:

    Dismantling Defenses: Trump 2.0 Cyber Year in Review

    Cory Doctorow says:

    America’s collapsing consumption is the world’s disenshittification opportunity

    Tech Dadu reports:

    EU Prepares Wider Data Retention Rules, VPN Providers Could Be Affected

    The Register reports:

    Denmark takes a Viking swing at VPN-enabled piracy

    Pariah States

    And:

    Amazon security boss blames Russia’s GRU for years-long energy-sector hacks

    China, Iran are having a field day with React2Shell, Google warns

    BleepingComputer reports:

    France arrests Latvian for installing malware on Italian ferry

    Denmark blames Russia for destructive cyberattack on water utility

    DarkReading reports:

    Russia Hits Critical Orgs Via Misconfigured Edge Devices

    Dormant Iran APT is Still Alive, Spying on Dissidents

    EuronNews reports:

    Pro-Russian hackers claim French postal service cyberattack

    Big Media

    Ben Werdmuller asks:

    Is the article dead?

    Just for brain-dead people.

    Nieman Lab’s Predictions for Journalism 2026

    Journalists talk about the elephant in the room: our relationship with Big Tech

    CyberCultural shares:

    My 2025 Indie Web Report and Thoughts on the Open Web

    404 Media reports:

    Archivists Posted the 60 Minutes CECOT Segment Bari Weiss Killed

    Big Tech

    The Nerd Reich reports:

    Tech Billionaires Flirt With the Guillotine

    JD Vance’s Theo Bro Network: Silicon Valley Meets ‘God’

    Futurism reports:

    Professor Warns That the Wealthy Are Trying to Use AI to Seize Control of Everything

    The Rebel Tech Alliance reports on:

    Surveillance Pricing

    404 Media reports:

    Hack Reveals the a16z-Backed Phone Farm Flooding TikTok With AI Influencers

    SuperBloom examines:

    From Content to Interface: Rethinking Platform Transparency Through Design

    Wanna-be Big Tech

    Mozilla spouts techbro delusions:

    Mozilla’s Next Chapter: Building the World’s Most Trusted Software Company

    Fuck Firefox.

    Pivot to AI has the reality:

    Firefox browser falls to AI. What do we do now?

    Zen, Waterfox, or LibreWolf, peeps.

    Cybersecurity/Privacy

    The Register reports:

    New React vulns leak secrets, invite DoS attacks

    Poisoned WhatsApp API package steals messages and accounts

    Krebs on Security reports:

    Most Parked Domains Now Serving Malicious Content

    DarkReading reports:

    Attackers Use Stolen AWS Credentials in Cryptomining Campaign

    BleepingComputer reports:

    Microsoft 365 accounts targeted in wave of OAuth phishing attacks

    Mullvad is:

    Announcing GotaTun, the future of WireGuard at Mullvad VPN

    Framasoft asks:

    Qui suis-je et quelle est mon identité ?

    404 Media reports:

    Flock Exposed Its AI-Powered Cameras to the Internet. We Tracked Ourselves

    Fediverse

    Tim Chambres shares:

    My 2026 Open Social Web Predictions

    Ploum shares:

    How We Lost Communication to Entertainment

    The Social Web Foundation explores:

    Implementing Encrypted Messaging over ActivityPub

    Literally, awesome.

    Connected Places has:

    Fediverse Report – 147

    PeerTube announces:

    Publish your videos with PeerTube for mobile!

    It’s FOSS reports:

    Decentralized YouTube Alternative PeerTube Adds Creator Mode

    Holos shares:

    How It Works

    ActivityPub for WordPress has:

    7.8.0 – Happy Holidays

    Jose Murilo shares:

    Museums in the Fediverse: Experiments with Tainacan, ActivityPub, and WebSocial

    DeadSuperHerson says:

    Ghost’s ActivityPub Integration Feels Half-Baked

    I feel the same way. And it’s why I am running a backup of The Programmer’s Fulcrum on WordPress to keep Ghost honest. We’ll see where TPF ends up in 2027.

    Mastodon shares its:

    Annual Report 2024

    Piefed announces:

    PieFed 1.4 is released – emoji, federated stackoverflow and AI content filters

    Empathy Forward announces:

    Charities.Place

    Fedify shares:

    Fedify 1.10.0: Observability foundations for the future debug dashboard

    Slightly Decentralized Social Media

    Connected Places has:

    ATmosphere Report 147 – Year’s end reflections

    ATProto Community has:

    Ændra Rininsland: Supporting and growing ATProto development in 2025 and beyond

    I am going to check Leaflet out.

    TechCrunch reports:

    Bluesky launches a privacy-focused ‘Find Friends’ feature without invite spam

    CTAs (aka show us some free love)

    Never stop fighting!

    Ringleader, Battalion
    Reuben Walker
    Follow me on the Fediverse

    #ActivityPub #AI #Autocracy #BigJournalism #BigTech #Bluesky #Democracy #Fascism #Fediverse #Holos #Mastodon #Peertube #RSS #StopChina #StopIsrael #StopRedAmerica #StopRussia #SupportUkraine #TechnoAnarchism #TechnoFeudalism battalion.mobileatom.net/?p=42
  16. I was playing for a while with the idea of utilising my site to post long stuff, but the so many'est person asking my opinion about Proton after reading an online post got me to actually do it.

    So here is what I think about Proton in general, with my thoughts on that blog post from Pivot to AI sprinkled in:
    cambionn.nl/some-thoughts-on-p

    RSS: cambionn.nl/feed

    Comments can go on this post, or just @ me.

    #privacy #security #Proton #ProtonLumo #AI #blog #blogging @protonprivacy @davidgerard

  17. Det var en meget skuffende “AI”-revolution

    Her et par år inde i, hvad der er blevet opreklameret som den kunstige intelligens’ æra, kan vi nøgternt se i øjnene, at vi har lagt såvel søgeresultater som administrativt, intellektuelt og kreativt arbejde i hænderne på glorificerede men dybt fejlbehæftede stavekontroller.

    Forfatteren Ted Chiang ser f eks ingen parallel til science fiction-genrens billeder af kunstig intelligens i det algoritmiske juks, vi får trukket ned over ørerne PT, men vælger at kalde det anvendt statistik. Det er dybest set Clippy v2, som står på spring for at foreslå at vi kommer en tube trælim i pizzasovsen, eller (ovre på det fhv Twitter) erklære sig selv en Mecha-Hitler.

    For det er jo ikke alene varm luft, der driver værket, det er også grundlæggende fascistiske verdenssyn og æstetikker der spyttes ud af generative “AI”-modeller (jeg er i skrivende stund ikke parat til at slippe gåseøjnene omkring betegnelsen, der nok vil fortsætte med at være et hult postulat i mange år endnu). Og den opvarmede luft kommer ikke bare fra Microsoft, Google og OpenAI’s marketingsafdelinger, men i lige så høj grad fra de massive datacentre, hvis energiforbrug allerede er ved at æde de CO2-nedskæringer, der iflg Paris-konventionen er det absolutte minimum for at bevare en beboelig planet.

    Der er altså ikke rigtig en forsvarlig brug af såkaldt “kunstige intelligens”, men det betyder ikke at den ikke bliver forsøgt brugt vidt og bredt, for nøj, hvor folk elsker en nem genvej til facit, selv når co-piloten styrer som den har kappet alle trosser til virkeligheden.

    Så kom “AI”-teknologien for at tage vores jobs? Kun i det omfang, arbejdskøbere mener at de kan tolerere et markant kvalitetsfald i virksomheden. Men — og her når jeg endelig humlen af indlægget — tog den livet af Superkulturs T-shirtproduktion? Ja. Ja, det gjorde den.

    Superkultur skulle jo fungere som en isoleret oase fra internettets store platforme, hvor alt lukker sig omkring den samme hjemmeside, med nogle få åbninger ud i RSS og det nogenlunde acceptable fødivers. Vores sidste(?) afhængighed af eksterne tjenester var tysk registrerede Spreadshirt, hvor vi gennem flere år har lagt egne tryk op til salg på T-shirts, kaffekopper og andet fjollet merch. Der var en del sparkedragter til babyer som gik usolgt hen!

    18 august sendte Spreadshirt en mail ud til alle sine brugere, om en forestående justering af priser, samt et nyt “AI”-designværktøj, der giver kunder “mulighed for nemt at tilpasse markedspladsdesigns via prompts. Hvis dit design bliver redigeret i vores designer ved hjælp af AI-funktionen, får du naturligvis stadig den normale betaling for dit oprindelige design“.

    Jo tak, du. Det er jo en ringe trøst, hvis kunder har bedt værktøjet om at smide en håndfuld hagekors oven i vores tryk. Som allerede nævnt er der en meget kort afstand fra almindelig clueless brug af “AI” til fascistiske budskaber, som får antallet af Youtube-anbefalinger før man sidder og kigger på en halshugning til at blegne. Selvsagt fór jeg til tastaturet for at spørge om, hvordan vi i Superkultur kan fravælge at medvirke i denne nyskabelse. Svaret er, at dette ikke kan lade sig gøre. Mit gensvar, som Spreadshirt PT ikke har svaret på, er:

    Så har vi desværre et ophavsmæssigt problem, hvor Spreadshirt vælger at gøre vore designs tilgængelige i sammenhænge, vi ikke har givet eller kan give samtykke til, fordi vi ikke har kontrol over konteksten hvori vores originale motiver indgår.
    Det her må I finde en løsning på, FØR I beslutter at implementere en buzzword-løsning som “AI”.

    I al retfærdighed skriver Spreadshirt også i den oprindelige opdateringsmail, at man meget gerne må kontakte dem med indvendinger mod de nye regler og funktioner. Dette skal isf ske til en separat emailadresse fra deres support. For en sikkerheds skyld sendte jeg følgende besked på engelsk, men har heller ikke her fået svar endnu:

    In response to your decision to make all sellers’ designs subject to “AI” alterations or customisations:

    YOU MAY NOT INCLUDE SUPERKULTUR’S DESIGNS IN “AI” OFFERINGS.

    Our designs are original IP and only made available in the understanding that they not be altered from the state and context in which they are offered, and on the products we have selected from Spreadshirt’s range.

    We will not tolerate that our original designs be used in any way, shape or form as training material for “generative AI”, or in any way repurposed from the intended context by your “AI” tools.

    For our longstanding position on the subject, we refer you to the product description for our Spreadshirt design “Butlersk Djihad

    Please respond at your earliest convenience that you have understood and will comply with these terms.

    De er dog tydelige med, at indsigelse = opsigelse: “Hvis du gør indsigelse mod de nye kontraktbestemmelser inden for fristen, vil de eksisterende bestemmelser generelt fortsat gælde. Bemærk dog, at da vi ønsker at behandle alle vores partnere ensartet, forbeholder vi os derfor ret til at opsige kontraktforholdet med dig i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i Partnerbetingelserne“.

    Så vi må gå ud fra, det var det for vores lille og langt fra profitable nebengesjæft med dybt indforståede T-shirtbudskaber for det superkulturelle folk. Men vi er langt fra de eneste med bekymringen overfor Spreadshirts maskinbegejstring. “AI”-kritikeren David Gerard har skrevet et overblik over situationenPivot to AI, med henvisning til et skønsomt udpluk af vrede reaktioner rundt om på nettet.

    Det kan nærmest ikke betale sig at flytte vores designs over til en anden print-on-demand-udbyder, for senkapitalismen og Cory Doctorows mundrette enshittification-begreb dikterer ligesom at alle kommercielle platforme befinder sig et eller andet sted på skråplanet ned i “AI”-dyndet. Jeg skal i de nærmeste dage omdanne siden Supercouture & grej til et mindesgalleri over den merchandise som nu må leve et efterliv som ikkun JPEGs og lasede loppefund.

    Som vi formulerede det i et ca fem år gammelt tryk:

    #AI_ #DavidGerard #denDummesteFremtid #enshittification #grej #spreadshirt #tShirts #TakForLort #TedChiang

  18. Det var en meget skuffende “AI”-revolution

    Her et par år inde i, hvad der er blevet opreklameret som den kunstige intelligens’ æra, kan vi nøgternt se i øjnene, at vi har lagt såvel søgeresultater som administrativt, intellektuelt og kreativt arbejde i hænderne på glorificerede men dybt fejlbehæftede stavekontroller.

    Forfatteren Ted Chiang ser f eks ingen parallel til science fiction-genrens billeder af kunstig intelligens i det algoritmiske juks, vi får trukket ned over ørerne PT, men vælger at kalde det anvendt statistik. Det er dybest set Clippy v2, som står på spring for at foreslå at vi kommer en tube trælim i pizzasovsen, eller (ovre på det fhv Twitter) erklære sig selv en Mecha-Hitler.

    For det er jo ikke alene varm luft, der driver værket, det er også grundlæggende fascistiske verdenssyn og æstetikker der spyttes ud af generative “AI”-modeller (jeg er i skrivende stund ikke parat til at slippe gåseøjnene omkring betegnelsen, der nok vil fortsætte med at være et hult postulat i mange år endnu). Og den opvarmede luft kommer ikke bare fra Microsoft, Google og OpenAI’s marketingsafdelinger, men i lige så høj grad fra de massive datacentre, hvis energiforbrug allerede er ved at æde de CO2-nedskæringer, der iflg Paris-konventionen er det absolutte minimum for at bevare en beboelig planet.

    Der er altså ikke rigtig en forsvarlig brug af såkaldt “kunstige intelligens”, men det betyder ikke at den ikke bliver forsøgt brugt vidt og bredt, for nøj, hvor folk elsker en nem genvej til facit, selv når co-piloten styrer som den har kappet alle trosser til virkeligheden.

    Så kom “AI”-teknologien for at tage vores jobs? Kun i det omfang, arbejdskøbere mener at de kan tolerere et markant kvalitetsfald i virksomheden. Men — og her når jeg endelig humlen af indlægget — tog den livet af Superkulturs T-shirtproduktion? Ja. Ja, det gjorde den.

    Superkultur skulle jo fungere som en isoleret oase fra internettets store platforme, hvor alt lukker sig omkring den samme hjemmeside, med nogle få åbninger ud i RSS og det nogenlunde acceptable fødivers. Vores sidste(?) afhængighed af eksterne tjenester var tysk registrerede Spreadshirt, hvor vi gennem flere år har lagt egne tryk op til salg på T-shirts, kaffekopper og andet fjollet merch. Der var en del sparkedragter til babyer som gik usolgt hen!

    18 august sendte Spreadshirt en mail ud til alle sine brugere, om en forestående justering af priser, samt et nyt “AI”-designværktøj, der giver kunder “mulighed for nemt at tilpasse markedspladsdesigns via prompts. Hvis dit design bliver redigeret i vores designer ved hjælp af AI-funktionen, får du naturligvis stadig den normale betaling for dit oprindelige design“.

    Jo tak, du. Det er jo en ringe trøst, hvis kunder har bedt værktøjet om at smide en håndfuld hagekors oven i vores tryk. Som allerede nævnt er der en meget kort afstand fra almindelig clueless brug af “AI” til fascistiske budskaber, som får antallet af Youtube-anbefalinger før man sidder og kigger på en halshugning til at blegne. Selvsagt fór jeg til tastaturet for at spørge om, hvordan vi i Superkultur kan fravælge at medvirke i denne nyskabelse. Svaret er, at dette ikke kan lade sig gøre. Mit gensvar, som Spreadshirt PT ikke har svaret på, er:

    Så har vi desværre et ophavsmæssigt problem, hvor Spreadshirt vælger at gøre vore designs tilgængelige i sammenhænge, vi ikke har givet eller kan give samtykke til, fordi vi ikke har kontrol over konteksten hvori vores originale motiver indgår.
    Det her må I finde en løsning på, FØR I beslutter at implementere en buzzword-løsning som “AI”.

    I al retfærdighed skriver Spreadshirt også i den oprindelige opdateringsmail, at man meget gerne må kontakte dem med indvendinger mod de nye regler og funktioner. Dette skal isf ske til en separat emailadresse fra deres support. For en sikkerheds skyld sendte jeg følgende besked på engelsk, men har heller ikke her fået svar endnu:

    In response to your decision to make all sellers’ designs subject to “AI” alterations or customisations:

    YOU MAY NOT INCLUDE SUPERKULTUR’S DESIGNS IN “AI” OFFERINGS.

    Our designs are original IP and only made available in the understanding that they not be altered from the state and context in which they are offered, and on the products we have selected from Spreadshirt’s range.

    We will not tolerate that our original designs be used in any way, shape or form as training material for “generative AI”, or in any way repurposed from the intended context by your “AI” tools.

    For our longstanding position on the subject, we refer you to the product description for our Spreadshirt design “Butlersk Djihad

    Please respond at your earliest convenience that you have understood and will comply with these terms.

    De er dog tydelige med, at indsigelse = opsigelse: “Hvis du gør indsigelse mod de nye kontraktbestemmelser inden for fristen, vil de eksisterende bestemmelser generelt fortsat gælde. Bemærk dog, at da vi ønsker at behandle alle vores partnere ensartet, forbeholder vi os derfor ret til at opsige kontraktforholdet med dig i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i Partnerbetingelserne“.

    Så vi må gå ud fra, det var det for vores lille og langt fra profitable nebengesjæft med dybt indforståede T-shirtbudskaber for det superkulturelle folk. Men vi er langt fra de eneste med bekymringen overfor Spreadshirts maskinbegejstring. “AI”-kritikeren David Gerard har skrevet et overblik over situationenPivot to AI, med henvisning til et skønsomt udpluk af vrede reaktioner rundt om på nettet.

    Det kan nærmest ikke betale sig at flytte vores designs over til en anden print-on-demand-udbyder, for senkapitalismen og Cory Doctorows mundrette enshittification-begreb dikterer ligesom at alle kommercielle platforme befinder sig et eller andet sted på skråplanet ned i “AI”-dyndet. Jeg skal i de nærmeste dage omdanne siden Supercouture & grej til et mindesgalleri over den merchandise som nu må leve et efterliv som ikkun JPEGs og lasede loppefund.

    Som vi formulerede det i et ca fem år gammelt tryk:

    #AI_ #DavidGerard #denDummesteFremtid #enshittification #grej #spreadshirt #tShirts #TakForLort #TedChiang

  19. Det var en meget skuffende “AI”-revolution

    Her et par år inde i, hvad der er blevet opreklameret som den kunstige intelligens’ æra, kan vi nøgternt se i øjnene, at vi har lagt såvel søgeresultater som administrativt, intellektuelt og kreativt arbejde i hænderne på glorificerede men dybt fejlbehæftede stavekontroller.

    Forfatteren Ted Chiang ser f eks ingen parallel til science fiction-genrens billeder af kunstig intelligens i det algoritmiske juks, vi får trukket ned over ørerne PT, men vælger at kalde det anvendt statistik. Det er dybest set Clippy v2, som står på spring for at foreslå at vi kommer en tube trælim i pizzasovsen, eller (ovre på det fhv Twitter) erklære sig selv en Mecha-Hitler.

    For det er jo ikke alene varm luft, der driver værket, det er også grundlæggende fascistiske verdenssyn og æstetikker der spyttes ud af generative “AI”-modeller (jeg er i skrivende stund ikke parat til at slippe gåseøjnene omkring betegnelsen, der nok vil fortsætte med at være et hult postulat i mange år endnu). Og den opvarmede luft kommer ikke bare fra Microsoft, Google og OpenAI’s marketingsafdelinger, men i lige så høj grad fra de massive datacentre, hvis energiforbrug allerede er ved at æde de CO2-nedskæringer, der iflg Paris-konventionen er det absolutte minimum for at bevare en beboelig planet.

    Der er altså ikke rigtig en forsvarlig brug af såkaldt “kunstige intelligens”, men det betyder ikke at den ikke bliver forsøgt brugt vidt og bredt, for nøj, hvor folk elsker en nem genvej til facit, selv når co-piloten styrer som den har kappet alle trosser til virkeligheden.

    Så kom “AI”-teknologien for at tage vores jobs? Kun i det omfang, arbejdskøbere mener at de kan tolerere et markant kvalitetsfald i virksomheden. Men — og her når jeg endelig humlen af indlægget — tog den livet af Superkulturs T-shirtproduktion? Ja. Ja, det gjorde den.

    Superkultur skulle jo fungere som en isoleret oase fra internettets store platforme, hvor alt lukker sig omkring den samme hjemmeside, med nogle få åbninger ud i RSS og det nogenlunde acceptable fødivers. Vores sidste(?) afhængighed af eksterne tjenester var tysk registrerede Spreadshirt, hvor vi gennem flere år har lagt egne tryk op til salg på T-shirts, kaffekopper og andet fjollet merch. Der var en del sparkedragter til babyer som gik usolgt hen!

    18 august sendte Spreadshirt en mail ud til alle sine brugere, om en forestående justering af priser, samt et nyt “AI”-designværktøj, der giver kunder “mulighed for nemt at tilpasse markedspladsdesigns via prompts. Hvis dit design bliver redigeret i vores designer ved hjælp af AI-funktionen, får du naturligvis stadig den normale betaling for dit oprindelige design“.

    Jo tak, du. Det er jo en ringe trøst, hvis kunder har bedt værktøjet om at smide en håndfuld hagekors oven i vores tryk. Som allerede nævnt er der en meget kort afstand fra almindelig clueless brug af “AI” til fascistiske budskaber, som får antallet af Youtube-anbefalinger før man sidder og kigger på en halshugning til at blegne. Selvsagt fór jeg til tastaturet for at spørge om, hvordan vi i Superkultur kan fravælge at medvirke i denne nyskabelse. Svaret er, at dette ikke kan lade sig gøre. Mit gensvar, som Spreadshirt PT ikke har svaret på, er:

    Så har vi desværre et ophavsmæssigt problem, hvor Spreadshirt vælger at gøre vore designs tilgængelige i sammenhænge, vi ikke har givet eller kan give samtykke til, fordi vi ikke har kontrol over konteksten hvori vores originale motiver indgår.
    Det her må I finde en løsning på, FØR I beslutter at implementere en buzzword-løsning som “AI”.

    I al retfærdighed skriver Spreadshirt også i den oprindelige opdateringsmail, at man meget gerne må kontakte dem med indvendinger mod de nye regler og funktioner. Dette skal isf ske til en separat emailadresse fra deres support. For en sikkerheds skyld sendte jeg følgende besked på engelsk, men har heller ikke her fået svar endnu:

    In response to your decision to make all sellers’ designs subject to “AI” alterations or customisations:

    YOU MAY NOT INCLUDE SUPERKULTUR’S DESIGNS IN “AI” OFFERINGS.

    Our designs are original IP and only made available in the understanding that they not be altered from the state and context in which they are offered, and on the products we have selected from Spreadshirt’s range.

    We will not tolerate that our original designs be used in any way, shape or form as training material for “generative AI”, or in any way repurposed from the intended context by your “AI” tools.

    For our longstanding position on the subject, we refer you to the product description for our Spreadshirt design “Butlersk Djihad

    Please respond at your earliest convenience that you have understood and will comply with these terms.

    De er dog tydelige med, at indsigelse = opsigelse: “Hvis du gør indsigelse mod de nye kontraktbestemmelser inden for fristen, vil de eksisterende bestemmelser generelt fortsat gælde. Bemærk dog, at da vi ønsker at behandle alle vores partnere ensartet, forbeholder vi os derfor ret til at opsige kontraktforholdet med dig i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i Partnerbetingelserne“.

    Så vi må gå ud fra, det var det for vores lille og langt fra profitable nebengesjæft med dybt indforståede T-shirtbudskaber for det superkulturelle folk. Men vi er langt fra de eneste med bekymringen overfor Spreadshirts maskinbegejstring. “AI”-kritikeren David Gerard har skrevet et overblik over situationenPivot to AI, med henvisning til et skønsomt udpluk af vrede reaktioner rundt om på nettet.

    Det kan nærmest ikke betale sig at flytte vores designs over til en anden print-on-demand-udbyder, for senkapitalismen og Cory Doctorows mundrette enshittification-begreb dikterer ligesom at alle kommercielle platforme befinder sig et eller andet sted på skråplanet ned i “AI”-dyndet. Jeg skal i de nærmeste dage omdanne siden Supercouture & grej til et mindesgalleri over den merchandise som nu må leve et efterliv som ikkun JPEGs og lasede loppefund.

    Som vi formulerede det i et ca fem år gammelt tryk:

    #AI_ #DavidGerard #denDummesteFremtid #enshittification #grej #spreadshirt #tShirts #TakForLort #TedChiang

  20. Pivot to AI: Kohl-Verlag’s new line of AI slop school textbooks. “The authors and illustrators don’t seem to exist. One author photo turned out to be a stock image. The books seem to have passed through editors who don’t exist either — because the books are AI slop, with really obvious AI-style errors that would have been spotted instantly if a single human had looked.”

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/01/pivot-to-ai-kohl-verlags-new-line-of-ai-slop-school-textbooks/