#mattmurray — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #mattmurray, aggregated by home.social.
-
Semafor Keeps Hosting Ridiculous “Restoring Trust In Media” Events That Only Further Undermine Trust In Media
-
Semafor Keeps Hosting Ridiculous “Restoring Trust In Media” Events That Only Further Undermine Trust In Media
-
Semafor Keeps Hosting Ridiculous “Restoring Trust In Media” Events That Only Further Undermine Trust In Media
-
Semafor Keeps Hosting Ridiculous “Restoring Trust In Media” Events That Only Further Undermine Trust In Media
-
Semafor Keeps Hosting Ridiculous “Restoring Trust In Media” Events That Only Further Undermine Trust In Media
-
Netflix Orders ‘Dang!’ Adult Animated Series Starring Stephanie Hsu, Poppy Liu & Andrew Law From ‘The Good Place’ Trio
#News #AndrewLaw #Dang #MattMurray #MikeSchur #Netflix #PoppyLiu #StephanieHsuhttps://deadline.com/2026/02/netflix-dang-adult-animated-series-mike-schur-andrew-law-1236728986/
-
The real reason why Jeff Bezos killed the Washington Post. – Slate
Jeff Bezos Killed the Washington Post
The billionaire wanted the Post to die, because a vigorous, well-resourced newspaper does not help his bottom line.
By Alex Kirshner, Feb 05, 202611:07 AM
Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Arnold Jerocki / FilmMagic and Andrew Harnik /Getty Images.Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
Jeff Bezos killed the Washington Post on Wednesday. The paper survives as a husk, but the institution that became one of the cathedrals of world journalism is gone. The biggest mistake one could make in analyzing this corporate slaughter is to lay the blame solely on the state of journalism. That’d be wrong.
Times are hard in journalism, just like they always are. The big new problem is A.I. swallowing up search traffic, which itself had already sucked up the ad revenue that used to go to newspapers and magazines. Otherwise, all of the things that have been hard for the past 20 years are still hard now. Powerful corporate interests have captured great newsrooms, or run their own old family businesses into the ground. Fox News, social media, and podcasts—in that chronological order—have cocooned a lot of people to want only “news” that isn’t really news. Megyn Kelly is now a red-meat podcaster instead of an occasionally punchy Fox host.
The Post laid off 300 journalists on Wednesday. This included more or less the entire remaining staff of the paper’s legendary sports section, which produced several of the best writers to ever do the job. The days of the superstar columnist with the biggest megaphone in town were long gone, but the section remained tremendous. The paper slashed its international coverage, laying off a journalist who found out as she reported from Kyiv. Many editors across desks lost their jobs. Worst of all, not that it’s a contest, but the Washington Post will now be a lot less Washingtonian. The paper has fired at least a substantial chunk of its metro reporters, who serviced a city and region that have been under a multifront attack from the Trump administration.
In a stiff email, Post executive editor Matt Murray tried to make this move sound like yet another example of a tough business forcing tough decisions. “The ecosystem of news and information, on- and off-platform, is changing radically,” Murray wrote to his staffers, fired and not. He lamented the “serious decline” of search traffic. He wrote of increased competition from other people, other platforms.
AI image…He did not write about one specific person: Bezos, who bought the paper from the Graham family in 2013 for $250 million. (Note: Slate is owned by Graham Holdings, the company controlled by the Graham family.)
That is because Murray values his paycheck and didn’t want to point out the Post’s real cause of death—namely, that one of the richest people in human history staged a controlled burn to turn it into ash. Bezos wanted the Post to die, because a vigorous, well-resourced Washington Post does not suit his vision for the world or his own bottom line. The end of the Post is a matter not of journalistic economics but of Bezos’ incentives.
Whatever the Post is worth today is immaterial to Bezos’ wealth. It’s barely even what you’d call a rounding error. Bezos could sustain the Post’s operating losses for hundreds of lifetimes without even threatening his current wealth, let alone the additional wealth he and his heirs will amass passively in years to come from his stakes in Amazon, Blue Origin, and who knows what else.
A man worth more than $240 billion does not care even a little bit, in pure dollar terms, about a $100 million annual loss running a prestige business. When Bezos bought the paper, he made clear to the Post’s prior management that he viewed the paper not purely through a profit lens, the New York Times reported. Bezos wrote to Post employees, “The paper’s duty will remain to its readers and not to the private interests of its owners.” That turned out to be, at best, incredibly misleading.
The Post itself doesn’t affect Bezos’ vast fortune much, but what it represents does. One of the employees he laid off on Wednesday was the paper’s Amazon reporter, Caroline O’Donovan. More critically, even under Bezos’ ownership, the Post frequently published stories that upset the Trump administration, whose vindictive approach to regulation could pose obvious problems for Amazon and Bezos’ space company, Blue Origin.
Related From Slate
Bezos understood this risk more than a year ago, when he drove away 250,000 paying subscribers by stepping in to prevent the paper from endorsing Kamala Harris. Bezos then transformed the Post’s opinion section, away from a broad-based page and into a propaganda arm devoted to promoting “personal liberties and free markets.”
The paper’s executives and owner punted away from aggressively covering Trump’s second term, bleeding both subscribers and a general share of viral stories that instead went to competitors like the Times and Wall Street Journal. There was money to be made by investing in the paper’s reporting staff, who never stopped doing their best to provide honest (and necessarily adversarial) coverage of Trump. Bezos just didn’t want that money.
Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: The real reason why Jeff Bezos killed the Washington Post.
Tags: AI, Competitors, Jeff Bezos, Journalism, Katherine Graham, Killed, Matt Murray, Newspapers Changing, Real Reason, Slate, Social Media
#AI #Competitors #JeffBezos #Journalism #KatherineGraham #Killed #MattMurray #NewspapersChanging #RealReason #Slate #SocialMedia -
The real reason why Jeff Bezos killed the Washington Post. – Slate
Jeff Bezos Killed the Washington Post
The billionaire wanted the Post to die, because a vigorous, well-resourced newspaper does not help his bottom line.
By Alex Kirshner, Feb 05, 202611:07 AM
Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Arnold Jerocki / FilmMagic and Andrew Harnik /Getty Images.Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
Jeff Bezos killed the Washington Post on Wednesday. The paper survives as a husk, but the institution that became one of the cathedrals of world journalism is gone. The biggest mistake one could make in analyzing this corporate slaughter is to lay the blame solely on the state of journalism. That’d be wrong.
Times are hard in journalism, just like they always are. The big new problem is A.I. swallowing up search traffic, which itself had already sucked up the ad revenue that used to go to newspapers and magazines. Otherwise, all of the things that have been hard for the past 20 years are still hard now. Powerful corporate interests have captured great newsrooms, or run their own old family businesses into the ground. Fox News, social media, and podcasts—in that chronological order—have cocooned a lot of people to want only “news” that isn’t really news. Megyn Kelly is now a red-meat podcaster instead of an occasionally punchy Fox host.
The Post laid off 300 journalists on Wednesday. This included more or less the entire remaining staff of the paper’s legendary sports section, which produced several of the best writers to ever do the job. The days of the superstar columnist with the biggest megaphone in town were long gone, but the section remained tremendous. The paper slashed its international coverage, laying off a journalist who found out as she reported from Kyiv. Many editors across desks lost their jobs. Worst of all, not that it’s a contest, but the Washington Post will now be a lot less Washingtonian. The paper has fired at least a substantial chunk of its metro reporters, who serviced a city and region that have been under a multifront attack from the Trump administration.
In a stiff email, Post executive editor Matt Murray tried to make this move sound like yet another example of a tough business forcing tough decisions. “The ecosystem of news and information, on- and off-platform, is changing radically,” Murray wrote to his staffers, fired and not. He lamented the “serious decline” of search traffic. He wrote of increased competition from other people, other platforms.
AI image…He did not write about one specific person: Bezos, who bought the paper from the Graham family in 2013 for $250 million. (Note: Slate is owned by Graham Holdings, the company controlled by the Graham family.)
That is because Murray values his paycheck and didn’t want to point out the Post’s real cause of death—namely, that one of the richest people in human history staged a controlled burn to turn it into ash. Bezos wanted the Post to die, because a vigorous, well-resourced Washington Post does not suit his vision for the world or his own bottom line. The end of the Post is a matter not of journalistic economics but of Bezos’ incentives.
Whatever the Post is worth today is immaterial to Bezos’ wealth. It’s barely even what you’d call a rounding error. Bezos could sustain the Post’s operating losses for hundreds of lifetimes without even threatening his current wealth, let alone the additional wealth he and his heirs will amass passively in years to come from his stakes in Amazon, Blue Origin, and who knows what else.
A man worth more than $240 billion does not care even a little bit, in pure dollar terms, about a $100 million annual loss running a prestige business. When Bezos bought the paper, he made clear to the Post’s prior management that he viewed the paper not purely through a profit lens, the New York Times reported. Bezos wrote to Post employees, “The paper’s duty will remain to its readers and not to the private interests of its owners.” That turned out to be, at best, incredibly misleading.
The Post itself doesn’t affect Bezos’ vast fortune much, but what it represents does. One of the employees he laid off on Wednesday was the paper’s Amazon reporter, Caroline O’Donovan. More critically, even under Bezos’ ownership, the Post frequently published stories that upset the Trump administration, whose vindictive approach to regulation could pose obvious problems for Amazon and Bezos’ space company, Blue Origin.
Related From Slate
Bezos understood this risk more than a year ago, when he drove away 250,000 paying subscribers by stepping in to prevent the paper from endorsing Kamala Harris. Bezos then transformed the Post’s opinion section, away from a broad-based page and into a propaganda arm devoted to promoting “personal liberties and free markets.”
The paper’s executives and owner punted away from aggressively covering Trump’s second term, bleeding both subscribers and a general share of viral stories that instead went to competitors like the Times and Wall Street Journal. There was money to be made by investing in the paper’s reporting staff, who never stopped doing their best to provide honest (and necessarily adversarial) coverage of Trump. Bezos just didn’t want that money.
Editor’s Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: The real reason why Jeff Bezos killed the Washington Post.
Tags: AI, Competitors, Jeff Bezos, Journalism, Katherine Graham, Killed, Matt Murray, Newspapers Changing, Real Reason, Slate, Social Media
#AI #Competitors #JeffBezos #Journalism #KatherineGraham #Killed #MattMurray #NewspapersChanging #RealReason #Slate #SocialMedia -
A newspaper writing its own death notice
My city no longer has a functioning newspaper. It’s true that the Washington Post still exists as offices in a building on K Street with its name out front, a site and an app, and an increasingly thin printed product–but the guts of the paper, the things that made the Post a local institution, got eviscerated Wednesday as if they were copper wire stripped out of the walls by looters.
The number of journalists fired via e-mails with the needlessly cruel subject line “Eliminated”—at least 300 out of some 800 in an already diminished newsroom–understates the damage inflicted by the Post’s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos, his Fleet Street fraud of a publisher Will Lewis, and Lewis’s spineless executive editor Matt Murray.
(I have to write “at least” because we still don’t know exactly how many people lost their jobs Wednesday, in part because Murray reportedly spiked a staff story about this exercise in institutional arson.)
The sports section is gone. Metro has been cut down to about a dozen reporters, smaller than the current masthead of my college paper. The photographers? Out the door. The foreign desk, among many other cutbacks, will no longer have anybody in the Middle East; decades of American troops on the ground there, sometimes coming home in coffins, no longer qualifies stationing a Post journalist in the region.
Management’s attempts to explain this defy belief: a poorly written letter to readers from Murray in Thursday’s print edition (“We are taking a series of actions, and rethinking some of the ways we do things, amid sweeping changes in our industry”) and his laughable contention to CNN that Bezos “wants the Post to be a bigger, relevant, thriving institution.”
Murray told the remaining staff in a memo that the paper will focus on politics and national security, which might be more workable if the Atlantic hadn’t already poached so many good Post journalists covering those topics. From outside the newsroom, it looks more like Bezos’s plan is to hold the paper’s head underwater until it grows gills.
Every Post reader should view this as an insult, an act of region-wide civic vandalism.
For the growing diaspora of ex-Posties, it feels more like a death in the family. The paper with bookshelves’ worth of Pulitzers was what many of us saw as a career summit worth an arduous ascent. It wasn’t the biggest or the most influential paper, but the chance to out-hustle those snobs at the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal was part of the fun. And the chance to be inspired by and learn from colleagues who could write like angels (to steal a phrase Ben Bradlee threw around in his autobiography) was part of the reward.
I loved working there until my last year or two, when I saw more and more people walk out the door after taking buyouts or early retirement or severance–and then I became one of those people. I remained a reader and a subscriber.
Bezos buying the paper for $250 million in 2013 was supposed to end that grueling decay and give the paper a fighting chance, in the form of ownership immune from stock-market pressure and rich enough to keep paving runway for the Post’s digital reinvention.
And for about a decade, it seemed to work: The paper rebuilt its coverage and staff and advanced its technology, its reporters covered Amazon’s failings rigorously, and Bezos publicly cheered on their work.
But then the Post’s growth during the first Trump administration stopped and reversed under the Biden administration, management squandered numerous opportunities to broaden and build out the Post’s business, and finally Bezos decided to start using the paper’s editorial section as a crude instrument of his own political leanings, starting with spiking an already-written endorsement of Kamala Harris.
Hundreds of thousands of cancelled subscriptions later and after losses that the WSJ reported hit $100 million last year, Wednesday’s careless ransacking of the newsroom represents a complete betrayal of Don Graham, the publisher whom we trusted would have never sold his family’s newspaper unless he had the deepest confidence in the buyer.
It didn’t have to come to this. By the time Bezos realized that owning the Post would never not be “a complexifier” for him, he could have sold the paper. He could have spun it off as a non-profit. He could have deeded it to his ex-wife Mackenzie Scott, who keeps showing herself to be the better billionaire. But having spent an infinitesimal fraction of his growing fortune to buy the Post, Bezos seems unwilling to admit defeat and eat a loss that wouldn’t match his yacht expenses.
To my friends at the Washington Post: I am so sorry this happened to you. This wasn’t your fault, but at least you can escape the newsroom with your honor intact. Here’s who can’t, absent some upcoming arc of redemption that I struggle to imagine: Bezos and his soulless lackeys Lewis and Murray. History and my city will never forgive them for what they did.
#betrayal #civicTrust #DemocracyDiesInDarkness #DonGraham #JeffBezos #MattMurray #MetroSection #PostSports #washingtonPost #WashingtonPostLayoffs #WillLewis -
A National Newspaper Falls — and Democracy Feels It
Why the Dismantling of The Washington Post Is a National Warning
By DrWeb, assisted by AI. All content, images edited and approved. Some images are also public domain, as noted in the captions.
AI image, created by Sora. Washington post Editorial 1 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal. To view a copy of this mark, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/On February 4, 2026, the American people lost a vital organ of their democracy. It didn’t happen in a courtroom or through a legislative act; it happened on a Zoom call.
When Executive Editor Matt Murray and CEO Will Lewis announced the termination of over 300 journalists—one-third of a newsroom that once stood as the world’s watchdog—they used the bloodless language of corporate “restructuring.” They spoke of search engine algorithms, the rise of Generative AI, and the “disappointing realities” of the media market. But we must see through the fog. This was not a business adjustment; it was a surrender.
The Washington Post has, for over 150 years, been a “living laboratory” of modern journalism. It was the place where the impossible stories were told, where “Darkness” was fought with a relentless, expensive, and often dangerous pursuit of the truth. By gutting the foreign desks and local Metro coverage, leadership has essentially declared that the world—and the citizens of the nation’s capital—no longer deserve to be seen.
II. A Legacy Forged in Fire: Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers
To understand the depth of this betrayal, one must remember what the Washington Post used to be. In 1971, the paper faced a choice that would define the First Amendment for a generation. When the Nixon administration secured an injunction against the New York Times to stop the publication of the Pentagon Papers, it was Katherine Graham and Ben Bradlee who stepped into the breach.
They knew that publishing those top-secret documents—which proved the government had systematically lied about the Vietnam War—could lead to criminal charges or the financial ruin of the paper. They did it anyway. They understood that the press’s duty is to the governed, not the governors. That Post saved this country by exposing the “GIGO (Garbage in, Garbage out” of the military-industrial complex. It proved that a newsroom, armed with the truth and the courage to print it, could stop a war machine. Today, that same newsroom is being hollowed out by a billionaire who appears more concerned with federal contracts than with the legacy of Graham.
III. The Specter of Anticipatory Obedience
The layoffs of 2026 are the completion of a bow toward power that began in October 2024. When Jeff Bezos spiked the Post’s endorsement of Kamala Harris, he was signaling a pivot toward compliance.
As his other companies —Amazon and Blue Origin— depend on massive federal contracts, the Post’s editorial independence has become a “rounding error” on a billionaire’s balance sheet. We are seeing a return to the dark days of “anticipatory obedience,” where the press silences itself to avoid the wrath of a vengeful administration. When the reporter covering Amazon itself is among the first to be fired, the watchdog is no longer guarding the public; it is guarding the owner.
IV. The Human Cost: Fired in a War Zone
The cruelty of these layoffs is exemplified by the case of Lizzie Johnson. A dedicated Ukraine correspondent, Johnson was notified of her layoff while on the ground in a war zone—working without heat or power in sub-zero temperatures to bring the reality of the Russian invasion to American doorsteps. To fire a journalist while they are literally under fire is the ultimate indictment of modern corporate “news.” By erasing the entire Middle East roster, the Post is blinding the American public to global realities at a moment when awareness is a matter of national survival.
V. What Can We Do?
Washington post Editorial 1 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal. To view a copy of this mark, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/My small site, a small but growing blog, remains (for now) a small, independent voice, but we are not silent, nor will we be. The death of the Post as we knew it means the burden of truth-seeking falls back onto We the People, and other media, and the resources they can use to report news and facts and fact-checking.
- Follow the Outcasts: Support the 300+ journalists who still have the truth but have lost their platform. [See below for the listings we have already of fired staff.]
- Reject the “New” Post: If a “Doorway” to truth is corrupted by billionaire interests, and with a man with real authoritarian impulses on a hair trigger, it is no longer a doorway; it is a wall. For me, the Post now has DO NOT ENTER signs.
- Fund Independent Journalism: Our American Democratic Republic depends on newsrooms that are not beholden to corporate authorities. Find voices that sound the missing pieces again, loud as we can.
Names and Work Areas for the Post Wednesday Massacre
While the Washington Post has not released a formal master list of the 300+ employees affected by the February 4, 2026 layoffs, many journalists and editors have confirmed their departures publicly. Source of this information: Google’s Gemini.
Below is a compiled listing of names and roles identified through newsroom reports and public statements as of today, February 5, 2026.
International & Foreign Desks
The entire Middle East team and several major foreign bureaus were reportedly eliminated.
NameRole / BureauIshaan TharoorSenior International Affairs ColumnistGerry ShihJerusalem Bureau ChiefClaire ParkerCairo Bureau ChiefSiobhán O’GradyUkraine Bureau ChiefLizzie JohnsonUkraine CorrespondentAaron WienerBerlin Bureau ChiefPranshu VermaNew Delhi Bureau ChiefEva DouChina Correspondent / TechnologyNilo TabrizyVisual Forensics Reporter (covering Iran/Middle East)Technology & Corporate Coverage
These cuts notably included reporters covering Jeff Bezos’s own company, Amazon.
NameRoleCaroline O’DonovanAmazon Beat ReporterJoseph MennTechnology Reporter (Cybersecurity/Disinformation)Heather KellyTechnology Reporter (San Francisco)Geoff FowlerTechnology ColumnistNix (First name pending)Tech ReporterDanielle AbrilTech ReporterMetro & Local Coverage (D.C., MD, VA)
The Metro desk was reduced from over 40 staffers to approximately 12.
NameRoleMichael Brice-SaddlerPeople and Politics ReporterMarissa LangEnterprise ReporterRachel WeinerTransportation ReporterEmma UberCrime and Criminal Justice ReporterKarina ElwoodVirginia Education ReporterDan Rosenzweig-ZiffHigher Education & Youth Culture ReporterSpecialty Desks (Sports, Books, Culture)
The Sports and Books sections were shuttered as standalone departments.
NameRoleJacob BroganBooks EditorNeil GreenbergSports Journalist / AnalyticsJada YuanNational Culture and Entertainment WriterEmmanuel FeltonRace and Ethnicity ReporterBrianna TuckerNational Politics ReporterDino GrandoniClimate/Environmental ReporterJesus RodriguezEditorial Writer / LifestyleEditor’s Note: Contact me via the About Page to remove your name or information from this listing.
Tactical Notes
- The “AI Strategy”: Executive Editor Matt Murray explicitly cited AI-generated content and declining search traffic as the primary reasons for this “strategic reset.”
- The Sports Desk Legacy: The shuttering of the High School Sports operation ends a department that had run for over 100 years.
- Ideological Critique: Several departing reporters, including Emmanuel Felton, have publicly challenged the “financial” necessity of the move, characterizing it instead as an ideological shift.
Multimedia Evidence
The Defense of Silence: Watch Jeff Bezos’s direct response to the endorsement crisis that served as the harbinger for this dismantling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=007rGogqDNo
[WATCH] Jeff Bezos defends the Washington Post’s decision
The Fourth Estate (Our Media) Responded as well.. they see what is being done to a legacy national newspaper, over politics and money. It did not fail in its mission. It was no longer allowed to be the Post.
Google News – Search – news.google.com Washington post Editorial 2 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal. To view a copy of this mark, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/Download
Below is a PDF snapshot of Google News coverage (late night, 2/4/26). You can see the headlines and the sources and the reactions. –DrWebBibliography (MLA Style)
- Baron, Martin. 28 Oct. 2024. “Marty Baron, former Washington Post editor, slams paper’s non-endorsement.” YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piGipOLJc2g.
- Folkenflik, David. 28 Oct. 2024. “The Washington Post bleeds subscriptions as Bezos responds to endorsement criticism.” NPR, https://www.npr.org/2024/10/28/nx-s1-5168449/washington-post-subscriptions-cancel-jeff-bezos-endorsement.
- Kagan, Robert. 25 Oct. 2024. “Washington Post editor-at-large resigns over Bezos’ decision. He explains why.” CNN, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIYdQS9Plw0.
- Serna, Alene. 26 Oct. 2024. “Washington Post stirs up fury in liberal America over neutral election stance.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/oct/26/washington-post-stirs-up-fury-in-liberal-america-over-neutral-election-stance.
SEE ALSO: Additional Deep-Dive Sources
- Columbia Journalism Review. 15 May 2023. “Journalism’s Essential Value: Objectivity and Independence.” CJR, https://www.cjr.org/special_report/ag-sulzberger-new-york-times-journalisms-essential-value-objectivity-independence.php.
- Nieman Journalism Lab. 31 Dec. 2025. “How Jeff Bezos used to talk about The Washington Post, and what’s changed.” Nieman Lab, https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/02/something-i-will-be-most-proud-of-when-im-90-how-jeff-bezos-used-to-talk-about-the-washington-post-and-whats-changed/.
- Sullivan, Margaret. 4 Sept. 2025. “Times Change, and So Can Ethics.” Columbia Journalism Review, https://www.cjr.org/analysis/times-change-and-so-can-journalism-ethics.php.
- Tani, Max. 28 Oct. 2024. “Four Washington Post opinion staffers have now resigned their roles over the non-endorsement controversy.” Semafor via Nieman Lab, https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/four-washington-post-opinion-staffers-have-now-resigned-their-roles-over-the-non-endorsement-controversy/.
Additional Historical Links
- Post History: Pentagon Papers & Watergate
- Folkenflik: The Metro Desk Bloodbath
- O’Donovan: Covering Amazon vs. Bezos
- Parker: The Murder of the Cairo Bureau
- Post Guild Union Statement
- Johnson: Fired in a War Zone
- Sullivan: Will Bezos Destroy the Post?
- Western Media’s Global Retreat
- Tani: Shuttering the Sports Section
- Historical Timeline of The Post
#2024Signal #300Outcasts #America #BenBradlee #CNN #democracy #DismantlingThePost #DonaldTrump #Education #FourthEstate #GoogleNewsCoverage #History #JeffBezos #KamalaHarris #KatherineGraham #MattMurray #NationalNewspaper #NewsCoverage #OneThirdOfNewsroom #PentagonPapers #Resistance #Surrender #TheWashingtonPost #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates #WarningForAmerica #WillLewis #YouTube -
Projecting the Penguins 2025-26 Lineup & Depth Chart https://www.rawchili.com/nhl/121224/ #alexeyev #ErikKarlsson #FilipHallander #Hockey #IlyaSamsonov #JoelBlomqvist #JoonaKoppanen #JustinBrazeau #KyleDubas #letang #MattDumba #MattMurray #NHL #penguins #PhilipTomasino #Pittsburgh #PittsburghPenguins #PittsburghPenguins #RyanGraves #Shea #ThePenguins #TristanJarry #VegasGoldenKnights
-
Maple Leafs Face Dilemma Naming No. 1 Netminder
As the 2022-23 season got underway, it was logical to assume that the Toronto Maple Leafs goaltending strategy was set to include Matt Murray as their No. 1 and Ilya Samsonov as their No. 2, with an open competition for the net throughout. ...
Read more:
https://thehockeywriters.com/maple-leafs-goalie-dilemma-murray-samsonov-kallgren/?src=mast2#MapleLeafsGoaltending #ErikKallgren #IlyaSamsonov #MattMurray #SheldonKeefe
#NHL #Hockey -
Maple Leafs Notes from Sabres Win: Matthews, Marner & Murray
In this edition of Toronto Maple Leafs News & Rumors, I’ll focus on takeaways from the 5-2 Maple Leafs' win over the Buffalo Sabres last night. It was one of the first times this season that Toronto fans were not sitting on the edge of their chairs w...
Read more:
https://thehockeywriters.com/maple-leafs-sabres-win-matthews-marner-murray/?src=mast2#TorontoMapleLeafs #AustonMatthews #MattMurray #MitchMarner
#NHL #Hockey -
Maple Leafs’ Goalie Matt Murray Is Not the Problem
When the Toronto Maple Leafs picked up goalie Matt Murray during the summer from the Ottawa Senators, there were critics. Tons of them.
Related: The 5 Greatest Goaltenders in NHL History
At the time, it seemed to many as if the Maple Leafs were getting d...
Read more:
https://thehockeywriters.com/maple-leafs-goalie-matt-murray-isnt-problem/?src=mast2#TorontoMapleLeafs #IlyaSamsonov #MattMurray #SheldonKeefe
#NHL #Hockey