#docket β Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #docket, aggregated by home.social.
-
#MissKittyPolitics how many people do you see me endorsing? - Unlike legacy media, #Democracy #Docket has no corporate owners or private investors. Their #pro-democracy north star is powered by @[email protected]. #DemocracyDocket #ProDemocracy #Journalism
-
#MissKittyPolitics how many people do you see me endorsing? - Unlike legacy media, #Democracy #Docket has no corporate owners or private investors. Their #pro-democracy north star is powered by @[email protected]. #DemocracyDocket #ProDemocracy #Journalism
-
And what is independent media good for? The reason to support it is because you're hoping to get the truth. #Democracy #Docket does a good job of it. So does #MissKitty. We are all #media now. Think like that and you'll get better information.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mggkcltfsc22 -
And what is independent media good for? The reason to support it is because you're hoping to get the truth. #Democracy #Docket does a good job of it. So does #MissKitty. We are all #media now. Think like that and you'll get better information.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mggkcltfsc22 -
And what is independent media good for? The reason to support it is because you're hoping to get the truth. #Democracy #Docket does a good job of it. So does #MissKitty. We are all #media now. Think like that and you'll get better information.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mggkcltfsc22 -
And what is independent media good for? The reason to support it is because you're hoping to get the truth. #Democracy #Docket does a good job of it. So does #MissKitty. We are all #media now. Think like that and you'll get better information.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mggkcltfsc22 -
And what is independent media good for? The reason to support it is because you're hoping to get the truth. #Democracy #Docket does a good job of it. So does #MissKitty. We are all #media now. Think like that and you'll get better information.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mggkcltfsc22 -
I agree. Check out #Democracy #Docket. @[email protected] is bringing it too!!
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mgi7bu77us2l -
I agree. Check out #Democracy #Docket. @[email protected] is bringing it too!!
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pjiafkey2cokiupsxpswqlk7/post/3mgi7bu77us2l -
You misunderstand. I documented what's already in place. I gave countermeasures from research. Since you can't find an elected to talk about this, you're left with Miss Kitty or #Democracy #Docket, beyond documented in my thread. Or go visit @[email protected] and read him for a while.
-
You misunderstand. I documented what's already in place. I gave countermeasures from research. Since you can't find an elected to talk about this, you're left with Miss Kitty or #Democracy #Docket, beyond documented in my thread. Or go visit @[email protected] and read him for a while.
-
#MissKittyPolitics According to #Democracy #Docket, @[email protected], the Department of Justice (DOJ) is employing an "Albus Strategy" using "Emergency Mandamus" petitions and framing actions as "criminal enforcement" to bypass lower court resistance to executive actions. ... π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
#MissKittyPolitics According to #Democracy #Docket, @[email protected], the Department of Justice (DOJ) is employing an "Albus Strategy" using "Emergency Mandamus" petitions and framing actions as "criminal enforcement" to bypass lower court resistance to executive actions. ... π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
#MissKittyPolitics According to #Democracy #Docket, @[email protected], the Department of Justice (DOJ) is employing an "Albus Strategy" using "Emergency Mandamus" petitions and framing actions as "criminal enforcement" to bypass lower court resistance to executive actions. ... π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
... This strategy involves designating a Special Assistant to the Attorney General with nationwide jurisdiction to select favorable venues and filing Writs of #Mandamus as an #emergency tool to #force #court #compliance or strip jurisdiction. Read the full analysis at #Democracy #Docket. π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
#MissKittyPolitics According to #Democracy #Docket, @[email protected], the Department of Justice (DOJ) is employing an "Albus Strategy" using "Emergency Mandamus" petitions and framing actions as "criminal enforcement" to bypass lower court resistance to executive actions. ... π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
... This strategy involves designating a Special Assistant to the Attorney General with nationwide jurisdiction to select favorable venues and filing Writs of #Mandamus as an #emergency tool to #force #court #compliance or strip jurisdiction. Read the full analysis at #Democracy #Docket. π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
#MissKittyPolitics According to #Democracy #Docket, @[email protected], the Department of Justice (DOJ) is employing an "Albus Strategy" using "Emergency Mandamus" petitions and framing actions as "criminal enforcement" to bypass lower court resistance to executive actions. ... π₯π₯π₯π½π½π½π₯π₯π₯
-
On 4 March, Donald Trump delivered his epic 100-minute speech to Congress, the longest such presidential address in US history.
Having finished speaking, in time-honored fashion, he walked down the line of supreme court justices, gladhanding each in turn before coming to a stop before the chief justice, #John #Roberts.
βThank you again, thank you again,β Trump said, taking Robertsβs hand into both his own and shaking it vigorously.
Then, as he began to step away, the president tapped Roberts on the arm in a gesture of buddy-buddy intimacy, and said: βWonβt forget.βSupreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively.
β¦οΈWas it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?
β¦οΈCould it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?
Whatever the truth, time has moved on since that friendly encounter months ago.
Were the president to bump into the chief justice today, one might expect an even more extravagant display of gratitude.πIn the past weeks America has witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of decisions from its highest court that should make Trump very happy indeed.
π₯The six rightwing justices who control the court β three of them given their lifetime seats by Trump himself β have effectively greenlighted the presidentβs explosive and law-busting agenda.
π₯The supermajority has granted Trump 18 straight victories in the administrationβs requests for emergency relief.
Steve Vladeck, a leading supreme court scholar at Georgetown University Law Center, has tracked the decisions in his Substack,
"One First", noting that the rulings have been handed down largely in the legal darkness.They have been piped through the courtβs so-called
β#shadow #docketβ,
where important affairs of state are decided at speed and with little or no debate or deliberation.
By Vladeckβs count,seven of the orders have been issued without any explanation, leaving the American people clueless as to the justicesβ thinking.Yet the emergency rulings, though temporary in nature, could have seismic consequences.
π₯For as long as they hold they have the potential to cause untold suffering to millions of people targeted by Trump.
πΈThat includes countless federal employees who can now be fired at whim after decades of loyal public service;
πΈtransgender people purged from the military;
πΈmore than 1 million individuals from Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba and other countries who are being stripped of their status to remain in the US;
πΈimmigrants singled out for deportation to war-torn third countries where their lives are in danger.πLegally, the consequences are also profound.
Several of Trumpβs actions given temporary go-ahead are of dubious legality,
violating congressional or international laws and running roughshod over fundamental tenets of the US constitution.By conceding to Trumpβs wishes, the justices have for now approved what Vladeck has called
βa truly unprecedented amount of lawlessness by the executive branchβ.The liberal-leaning justice Sonia Sotomayor has sounded a similar alarm in a series of increasingly despairing dissenting opinions.
Her conservative peers on the court, she has written, are
βrewarding lawlessnessβ,
and undermining the bedrock principle that America is a
βgovernment of laws, not of menβ.All of this has put Roberts, 70, in a strange and uncomfortable position.
Just as he should be celebrating the completion of his 20th year at the pinnacle of the US judiciary,
he is being accused of betraying the very legal edifice he is supposed to protect.Prominent jurists have held Roberts responsible for emboldening Trumpβs drive towards an authoritarian presidency.
J Michael Luttig, who served on a federal appeals court for 15 years, put the criticism starkly.
ββThe chief justice is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America,β Luttig told the Guardian.In Luttig's view, the court under Roberts is
βοΈβacquiescing in and accommodating the presidentβs lawlessness.
And it is doing so without briefing, without argument, without deliberation
β and without even a single word of explanation of its decisions.βFor Luttig, this is more than just the 6-3 supermajority of the court expressing its conservatism.
π₯This is a fundamental distortion of the American legal system.βThe supreme court was never intended to function like this.
Never before has it entertained such challenges from the president,
and never before has it decided them so flippantly.β -
On 4 March, Donald Trump delivered his epic 100-minute speech to Congress, the longest such presidential address in US history.
Having finished speaking, in time-honored fashion, he walked down the line of supreme court justices, gladhanding each in turn before coming to a stop before the chief justice, #John #Roberts.
βThank you again, thank you again,β Trump said, taking Robertsβs hand into both his own and shaking it vigorously.
Then, as he began to step away, the president tapped Roberts on the arm in a gesture of buddy-buddy intimacy, and said: βWonβt forget.βSupreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively.
β¦οΈWas it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?
β¦οΈCould it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?
Whatever the truth, time has moved on since that friendly encounter months ago.
Were the president to bump into the chief justice today, one might expect an even more extravagant display of gratitude.πIn the past weeks America has witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of decisions from its highest court that should make Trump very happy indeed.
π₯The six rightwing justices who control the court β three of them given their lifetime seats by Trump himself β have effectively greenlighted the presidentβs explosive and law-busting agenda.
π₯The supermajority has granted Trump 18 straight victories in the administrationβs requests for emergency relief.
Steve Vladeck, a leading supreme court scholar at Georgetown University Law Center, has tracked the decisions in his Substack,
"One First", noting that the rulings have been handed down largely in the legal darkness.They have been piped through the courtβs so-called
β#shadow #docketβ,
where important affairs of state are decided at speed and with little or no debate or deliberation.
By Vladeckβs count,seven of the orders have been issued without any explanation, leaving the American people clueless as to the justicesβ thinking.Yet the emergency rulings, though temporary in nature, could have seismic consequences.
π₯For as long as they hold they have the potential to cause untold suffering to millions of people targeted by Trump.
πΈThat includes countless federal employees who can now be fired at whim after decades of loyal public service;
πΈtransgender people purged from the military;
πΈmore than 1 million individuals from Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba and other countries who are being stripped of their status to remain in the US;
πΈimmigrants singled out for deportation to war-torn third countries where their lives are in danger.πLegally, the consequences are also profound.
Several of Trumpβs actions given temporary go-ahead are of dubious legality,
violating congressional or international laws and running roughshod over fundamental tenets of the US constitution.By conceding to Trumpβs wishes, the justices have for now approved what Vladeck has called
βa truly unprecedented amount of lawlessness by the executive branchβ.The liberal-leaning justice Sonia Sotomayor has sounded a similar alarm in a series of increasingly despairing dissenting opinions.
Her conservative peers on the court, she has written, are
βrewarding lawlessnessβ,
and undermining the bedrock principle that America is a
βgovernment of laws, not of menβ.All of this has put Roberts, 70, in a strange and uncomfortable position.
Just as he should be celebrating the completion of his 20th year at the pinnacle of the US judiciary,
he is being accused of betraying the very legal edifice he is supposed to protect.Prominent jurists have held Roberts responsible for emboldening Trumpβs drive towards an authoritarian presidency.
J Michael Luttig, who served on a federal appeals court for 15 years, put the criticism starkly.
ββThe chief justice is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America,β Luttig told the Guardian.In Luttig's view, the court under Roberts is
βοΈβacquiescing in and accommodating the presidentβs lawlessness.
And it is doing so without briefing, without argument, without deliberation
β and without even a single word of explanation of its decisions.βFor Luttig, this is more than just the 6-3 supermajority of the court expressing its conservatism.
π₯This is a fundamental distortion of the American legal system.βThe supreme court was never intended to function like this.
Never before has it entertained such challenges from the president,
and never before has it decided them so flippantly.β -
On 4 March, Donald Trump delivered his epic 100-minute speech to Congress, the longest such presidential address in US history.
Having finished speaking, in time-honored fashion, he walked down the line of supreme court justices, gladhanding each in turn before coming to a stop before the chief justice, #John #Roberts.
βThank you again, thank you again,β Trump said, taking Robertsβs hand into both his own and shaking it vigorously.
Then, as he began to step away, the president tapped Roberts on the arm in a gesture of buddy-buddy intimacy, and said: βWonβt forget.βSupreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively.
β¦οΈWas it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?
β¦οΈCould it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?
Whatever the truth, time has moved on since that friendly encounter months ago.
Were the president to bump into the chief justice today, one might expect an even more extravagant display of gratitude.πIn the past weeks America has witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of decisions from its highest court that should make Trump very happy indeed.
π₯The six rightwing justices who control the court β three of them given their lifetime seats by Trump himself β have effectively greenlighted the presidentβs explosive and law-busting agenda.
π₯The supermajority has granted Trump 18 straight victories in the administrationβs requests for emergency relief.
Steve Vladeck, a leading supreme court scholar at Georgetown University Law Center, has tracked the decisions in his Substack,
"One First", noting that the rulings have been handed down largely in the legal darkness.They have been piped through the courtβs so-called
β#shadow #docketβ,
where important affairs of state are decided at speed and with little or no debate or deliberation.
By Vladeckβs count,seven of the orders have been issued without any explanation, leaving the American people clueless as to the justicesβ thinking.Yet the emergency rulings, though temporary in nature, could have seismic consequences.
π₯For as long as they hold they have the potential to cause untold suffering to millions of people targeted by Trump.
πΈThat includes countless federal employees who can now be fired at whim after decades of loyal public service;
πΈtransgender people purged from the military;
πΈmore than 1 million individuals from Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba and other countries who are being stripped of their status to remain in the US;
πΈimmigrants singled out for deportation to war-torn third countries where their lives are in danger.πLegally, the consequences are also profound.
Several of Trumpβs actions given temporary go-ahead are of dubious legality,
violating congressional or international laws and running roughshod over fundamental tenets of the US constitution.By conceding to Trumpβs wishes, the justices have for now approved what Vladeck has called
βa truly unprecedented amount of lawlessness by the executive branchβ.The liberal-leaning justice Sonia Sotomayor has sounded a similar alarm in a series of increasingly despairing dissenting opinions.
Her conservative peers on the court, she has written, are
βrewarding lawlessnessβ,
and undermining the bedrock principle that America is a
βgovernment of laws, not of menβ.All of this has put Roberts, 70, in a strange and uncomfortable position.
Just as he should be celebrating the completion of his 20th year at the pinnacle of the US judiciary,
he is being accused of betraying the very legal edifice he is supposed to protect.Prominent jurists have held Roberts responsible for emboldening Trumpβs drive towards an authoritarian presidency.
J Michael Luttig, who served on a federal appeals court for 15 years, put the criticism starkly.
ββThe chief justice is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America,β Luttig told the Guardian.In Luttig's view, the court under Roberts is
βοΈβacquiescing in and accommodating the presidentβs lawlessness.
And it is doing so without briefing, without argument, without deliberation
β and without even a single word of explanation of its decisions.βFor Luttig, this is more than just the 6-3 supermajority of the court expressing its conservatism.
π₯This is a fundamental distortion of the American legal system.βThe supreme court was never intended to function like this.
Never before has it entertained such challenges from the president,
and never before has it decided them so flippantly.β -
On 4 March, Donald Trump delivered his epic 100-minute speech to Congress, the longest such presidential address in US history.
Having finished speaking, in time-honored fashion, he walked down the line of supreme court justices, gladhanding each in turn before coming to a stop before the chief justice, #John #Roberts.
βThank you again, thank you again,β Trump said, taking Robertsβs hand into both his own and shaking it vigorously.
Then, as he began to step away, the president tapped Roberts on the arm in a gesture of buddy-buddy intimacy, and said: βWonβt forget.βSupreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively.
β¦οΈWas it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?
β¦οΈCould it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?
Whatever the truth, time has moved on since that friendly encounter months ago.
Were the president to bump into the chief justice today, one might expect an even more extravagant display of gratitude.πIn the past weeks America has witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of decisions from its highest court that should make Trump very happy indeed.
π₯The six rightwing justices who control the court β three of them given their lifetime seats by Trump himself β have effectively greenlighted the presidentβs explosive and law-busting agenda.
π₯The supermajority has granted Trump 18 straight victories in the administrationβs requests for emergency relief.
Steve Vladeck, a leading supreme court scholar at Georgetown University Law Center, has tracked the decisions in his Substack,
"One First", noting that the rulings have been handed down largely in the legal darkness.They have been piped through the courtβs so-called
β#shadow #docketβ,
where important affairs of state are decided at speed and with little or no debate or deliberation.
By Vladeckβs count,seven of the orders have been issued without any explanation, leaving the American people clueless as to the justicesβ thinking.Yet the emergency rulings, though temporary in nature, could have seismic consequences.
π₯For as long as they hold they have the potential to cause untold suffering to millions of people targeted by Trump.
πΈThat includes countless federal employees who can now be fired at whim after decades of loyal public service;
πΈtransgender people purged from the military;
πΈmore than 1 million individuals from Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba and other countries who are being stripped of their status to remain in the US;
πΈimmigrants singled out for deportation to war-torn third countries where their lives are in danger.πLegally, the consequences are also profound.
Several of Trumpβs actions given temporary go-ahead are of dubious legality,
violating congressional or international laws and running roughshod over fundamental tenets of the US constitution.By conceding to Trumpβs wishes, the justices have for now approved what Vladeck has called
βa truly unprecedented amount of lawlessness by the executive branchβ.The liberal-leaning justice Sonia Sotomayor has sounded a similar alarm in a series of increasingly despairing dissenting opinions.
Her conservative peers on the court, she has written, are
βrewarding lawlessnessβ,
and undermining the bedrock principle that America is a
βgovernment of laws, not of menβ.All of this has put Roberts, 70, in a strange and uncomfortable position.
Just as he should be celebrating the completion of his 20th year at the pinnacle of the US judiciary,
he is being accused of betraying the very legal edifice he is supposed to protect.Prominent jurists have held Roberts responsible for emboldening Trumpβs drive towards an authoritarian presidency.
J Michael Luttig, who served on a federal appeals court for 15 years, put the criticism starkly.
ββThe chief justice is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America,β Luttig told the Guardian.In Luttig's view, the court under Roberts is
βοΈβacquiescing in and accommodating the presidentβs lawlessness.
And it is doing so without briefing, without argument, without deliberation
β and without even a single word of explanation of its decisions.βFor Luttig, this is more than just the 6-3 supermajority of the court expressing its conservatism.
π₯This is a fundamental distortion of the American legal system.βThe supreme court was never intended to function like this.
Never before has it entertained such challenges from the president,
and never before has it decided them so flippantly.β -
On 4 March, Donald Trump delivered his epic 100-minute speech to Congress, the longest such presidential address in US history.
Having finished speaking, in time-honored fashion, he walked down the line of supreme court justices, gladhanding each in turn before coming to a stop before the chief justice, #John #Roberts.
βThank you again, thank you again,β Trump said, taking Robertsβs hand into both his own and shaking it vigorously.
Then, as he began to step away, the president tapped Roberts on the arm in a gesture of buddy-buddy intimacy, and said: βWonβt forget.βSupreme court watchers have wondered why Trump thanked the chief justice so effusively.
β¦οΈWas it because the Roberts court had, exactly a year earlier, allowed Trump to stay on the electoral ballot even though he had inspired a violent mob attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021?
β¦οΈCould it have been that Roberts had written the ruling that immunised Trump from criminal prosecution for that January 6 insurrection and for any other criminal misdeed he might commit while in the White House?
Whatever the truth, time has moved on since that friendly encounter months ago.
Were the president to bump into the chief justice today, one might expect an even more extravagant display of gratitude.πIn the past weeks America has witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of decisions from its highest court that should make Trump very happy indeed.
π₯The six rightwing justices who control the court β three of them given their lifetime seats by Trump himself β have effectively greenlighted the presidentβs explosive and law-busting agenda.
π₯The supermajority has granted Trump 18 straight victories in the administrationβs requests for emergency relief.
Steve Vladeck, a leading supreme court scholar at Georgetown University Law Center, has tracked the decisions in his Substack,
"One First", noting that the rulings have been handed down largely in the legal darkness.They have been piped through the courtβs so-called
β#shadow #docketβ,
where important affairs of state are decided at speed and with little or no debate or deliberation.
By Vladeckβs count,seven of the orders have been issued without any explanation, leaving the American people clueless as to the justicesβ thinking.Yet the emergency rulings, though temporary in nature, could have seismic consequences.
π₯For as long as they hold they have the potential to cause untold suffering to millions of people targeted by Trump.
πΈThat includes countless federal employees who can now be fired at whim after decades of loyal public service;
πΈtransgender people purged from the military;
πΈmore than 1 million individuals from Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba and other countries who are being stripped of their status to remain in the US;
πΈimmigrants singled out for deportation to war-torn third countries where their lives are in danger.πLegally, the consequences are also profound.
Several of Trumpβs actions given temporary go-ahead are of dubious legality,
violating congressional or international laws and running roughshod over fundamental tenets of the US constitution.By conceding to Trumpβs wishes, the justices have for now approved what Vladeck has called
βa truly unprecedented amount of lawlessness by the executive branchβ.The liberal-leaning justice Sonia Sotomayor has sounded a similar alarm in a series of increasingly despairing dissenting opinions.
Her conservative peers on the court, she has written, are
βrewarding lawlessnessβ,
and undermining the bedrock principle that America is a
βgovernment of laws, not of menβ.All of this has put Roberts, 70, in a strange and uncomfortable position.
Just as he should be celebrating the completion of his 20th year at the pinnacle of the US judiciary,
he is being accused of betraying the very legal edifice he is supposed to protect.Prominent jurists have held Roberts responsible for emboldening Trumpβs drive towards an authoritarian presidency.
J Michael Luttig, who served on a federal appeals court for 15 years, put the criticism starkly.
ββThe chief justice is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America,β Luttig told the Guardian.In Luttig's view, the court under Roberts is
βοΈβacquiescing in and accommodating the presidentβs lawlessness.
And it is doing so without briefing, without argument, without deliberation
β and without even a single word of explanation of its decisions.βFor Luttig, this is more than just the 6-3 supermajority of the court expressing its conservatism.
π₯This is a fundamental distortion of the American legal system.βThe supreme court was never intended to function like this.
Never before has it entertained such challenges from the president,
and never before has it decided them so flippantly.β -
π Behold, the revolutionary system for taking notes in meetings, because jotting things down on paper was just too archaic for the 21st century π. Introducing Docket: a groundbreaking tool for transforming "Yes, Iβm listening" into "Yes, Iβm pretending to listen while typing furiously" π». Because nothing screams #productivity like turning your 1-1s into 0-0s of attention! π
https://withdocket.com #Docket #MeetingNotes #Innovation #DigitalCommunication #HackerNews #ngated -
π Behold, the revolutionary system for taking notes in meetings, because jotting things down on paper was just too archaic for the 21st century π. Introducing Docket: a groundbreaking tool for transforming "Yes, Iβm listening" into "Yes, Iβm pretending to listen while typing furiously" π». Because nothing screams #productivity like turning your 1-1s into 0-0s of attention! π
https://withdocket.com #Docket #MeetingNotes #Innovation #DigitalCommunication #HackerNews #ngated -
π Behold, the revolutionary system for taking notes in meetings, because jotting things down on paper was just too archaic for the 21st century π. Introducing Docket: a groundbreaking tool for transforming "Yes, Iβm listening" into "Yes, Iβm pretending to listen while typing furiously" π». Because nothing screams #productivity like turning your 1-1s into 0-0s of attention! π
https://withdocket.com #Docket #MeetingNotes #Innovation #DigitalCommunication #HackerNews #ngated -
π Behold, the revolutionary system for taking notes in meetings, because jotting things down on paper was just too archaic for the 21st century π. Introducing Docket: a groundbreaking tool for transforming "Yes, Iβm listening" into "Yes, Iβm pretending to listen while typing furiously" π». Because nothing screams #productivity like turning your 1-1s into 0-0s of attention! π
https://withdocket.com #Docket #MeetingNotes #Innovation #DigitalCommunication #HackerNews #ngated -
We took pictures of each otherβs signs! Hers was so great, w the little doll hands and the red cheeks of the SCOTUS puppets. So cheap, only $4.3M each!
Her scissors message is spot on: βWhen injustice becomes law, resistance becomes dutyβ.
#SCOTUS #puppets of #fascist #president #shadow #docket #rulings #executive #powers #congress #oversight #OurPutin was #crowned #king by #Roberts #court but #Dont #Give #Up #Hop #We #Can #Do #It #NYC #NoKings #peaceful #protest #march -
We took pictures of each otherβs signs! Hers was so great, w the little doll hands and the red cheeks of the SCOTUS puppets. So cheap, only $4.3M each!
Her scissors message is spot on: βWhen injustice becomes law, resistance becomes dutyβ.
#SCOTUS #puppets of #fascist #president #shadow #docket #rulings #executive #powers #congress #oversight #OurPutin was #crowned #king by #Roberts #court but #Dont #Give #Up #Hop #We #Can #Do #It #NYC #NoKings #peaceful #protest #march -
We took pictures of each otherβs signs! Hers was so great, w the little doll hands and the red cheeks of the SCOTUS puppets. So cheap, only $4.3M each!
Her scissors message is spot on: βWhen injustice becomes law, resistance becomes dutyβ.
#SCOTUS #puppets of #fascist #president #shadow #docket #rulings #executive #powers #congress #oversight #OurPutin was #crowned #king by #Roberts #court but #Dont #Give #Up #Hop #We #Can #Do #It #NYC #NoKings #peaceful #protest #march -
We took pictures of each otherβs signs! Hers was so great, w the little doll hands and the red cheeks of the SCOTUS puppets. So cheap, only $4.3M each!
Her scissors message is spot on: βWhen injustice becomes law, resistance becomes dutyβ.
#SCOTUS #puppets of #fascist #president #shadow #docket #rulings #executive #powers #congress #oversight #OurPutin was #crowned #king by #Roberts #court but #Dont #Give #Up #Hop #We #Can #Do #It #NYC #NoKings #peaceful #protest #march -
We took pictures of each otherβs signs! Hers was so great, w the little doll hands and the red cheeks of the SCOTUS puppets. So cheap, only $4.3M each!
Her scissors message is spot on: βWhen injustice becomes law, resistance becomes dutyβ.
#SCOTUS #puppets of #fascist #president #shadow #docket #rulings #executive #powers #congress #oversight #OurPutin was #crowned #king by #Roberts #court but #Dont #Give #Up #Hop #We #Can #Do #It #NYC #NoKings #peaceful #protest #march -
Even if we hold meaningful elections, and he loses in '28, #OurPutin's not going anywhere. SCOTUS said in Tr^mp vs. USA (link) that anything he does to stay in office (def would be an "official act"), i.e. bring in fake electors like last time, is completely legal and cannot be challenged. He's not leaving the White House for a very. long. time.
#AnotherOrban #fascist #USA #free & #fair #elections #democracy #kangaroo #SupremeCourt #shadow #docket #creates #dictator https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/603/23-939/ -
Even if we hold meaningful elections, and he loses in '28, #OurPutin's not going anywhere. SCOTUS said in Tr^mp vs. USA (link) that anything he does to stay in office (def would be an "official act"), i.e. bring in fake electors like last time, is completely legal and cannot be challenged. He's not leaving the White House for a very. long. time.
#AnotherOrban #fascist #USA #free & #fair #elections #democracy #kangaroo #SupremeCourt #shadow #docket #creates #dictator https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/603/23-939/ -
Even if we hold meaningful elections, and he loses in '28, #OurPutin's not going anywhere. SCOTUS said in Tr^mp vs. USA (link) that anything he does to stay in office (def would be an "official act"), i.e. bring in fake electors like last time, is completely legal and cannot be challenged. He's not leaving the White House for a very. long. time.
#AnotherOrban #fascist #USA #free & #fair #elections #democracy #kangaroo #SupremeCourt #shadow #docket #creates #dictator https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/603/23-939/ -
Even if we hold meaningful elections, and he loses in '28, #OurPutin's not going anywhere. SCOTUS said in Tr^mp vs. USA (link) that anything he does to stay in office (def would be an "official act"), i.e. bring in fake electors like last time, is completely legal and cannot be challenged. He's not leaving the White House for a very. long. time.
#AnotherOrban #fascist #USA #free & #fair #elections #democracy #kangaroo #SupremeCourt #shadow #docket #creates #dictator https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/603/23-939/ -
Even if we hold meaningful elections, and he loses in '28, #OurPutin's not going anywhere. SCOTUS said in Tr^mp vs. USA (link) that anything he does to stay in office (def would be an "official act"), i.e. bring in fake electors like last time, is completely legal and cannot be challenged. He's not leaving the White House for a very. long. time.
#AnotherOrban #fascist #USA #free & #fair #elections #democracy #kangaroo #SupremeCourt #shadow #docket #creates #dictator https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/603/23-939/ -
"Microsoft recently released Edit, a new terminal text editor written in Rust. It's pretty nice - it's reminiscent of nano but with a retro MS DOS feel.
I wanted to run it on my Apple Silicon Mac. Microsoft don't (yet) provide compiled builds for that platform, but they do have a release for aarch64-linux-gnu. I figured I'd run that in o Docker container (I have Docker for Desktop installed) to try it out.
One thing lead to another and I ended up creating and shipping a new Docker image to GitHub's Container Registry. This means anyone with an Apple Silicon Mac and Docker can try out edit against the files in their current directory by running this command:"
-
"Microsoft recently released Edit, a new terminal text editor written in Rust. It's pretty nice - it's reminiscent of nano but with a retro MS DOS feel.
I wanted to run it on my Apple Silicon Mac. Microsoft don't (yet) provide compiled builds for that platform, but they do have a release for aarch64-linux-gnu. I figured I'd run that in o Docker container (I have Docker for Desktop installed) to try it out.
One thing lead to another and I ended up creating and shipping a new Docker image to GitHub's Container Registry. This means anyone with an Apple Silicon Mac and Docker can try out edit against the files in their current directory by running this command:"
-
"Microsoft recently released Edit, a new terminal text editor written in Rust. It's pretty nice - it's reminiscent of nano but with a retro MS DOS feel.
I wanted to run it on my Apple Silicon Mac. Microsoft don't (yet) provide compiled builds for that platform, but they do have a release for aarch64-linux-gnu. I figured I'd run that in o Docker container (I have Docker for Desktop installed) to try it out.
One thing lead to another and I ended up creating and shipping a new Docker image to GitHub's Container Registry. This means anyone with an Apple Silicon Mac and Docker can try out edit against the files in their current directory by running this command:"
-
"Microsoft recently released Edit, a new terminal text editor written in Rust. It's pretty nice - it's reminiscent of nano but with a retro MS DOS feel.
I wanted to run it on my Apple Silicon Mac. Microsoft don't (yet) provide compiled builds for that platform, but they do have a release for aarch64-linux-gnu. I figured I'd run that in o Docker container (I have Docker for Desktop installed) to try it out.
One thing lead to another and I ended up creating and shipping a new Docker image to GitHub's Container Registry. This means anyone with an Apple Silicon Mac and Docker can try out edit against the files in their current directory by running this command:"
-
"Microsoft recently released Edit, a new terminal text editor written in Rust. It's pretty nice - it's reminiscent of nano but with a retro MS DOS feel.
I wanted to run it on my Apple Silicon Mac. Microsoft don't (yet) provide compiled builds for that platform, but they do have a release for aarch64-linux-gnu. I figured I'd run that in o Docker container (I have Docker for Desktop installed) to try it out.
One thing lead to another and I ended up creating and shipping a new Docker image to GitHub's Container Registry. This means anyone with an Apple Silicon Mac and Docker can try out edit against the files in their current directory by running this command:"
-
@marcelias
founded #Democracy #Docket to expose GOP attacks on democracy.When Trump takes office, it will step-up to meet the moment.
Democracy Docket is fearlessly independent and unapologetically pro-democracy.
It will not back down.
It will never obey.Join at: https://www.democracydocket.com/me-subscribe-bsky/
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3lg6nywq4rs23
-
@marcelias
founded #Democracy #Docket to expose GOP attacks on democracy.When Trump takes office, it will step-up to meet the moment.
Democracy Docket is fearlessly independent and unapologetically pro-democracy.
It will not back down.
It will never obey.Join at: https://www.democracydocket.com/me-subscribe-bsky/
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3lg6nywq4rs23
-
@marcelias
founded #Democracy #Docket to expose GOP attacks on democracy.When Trump takes office, it will step-up to meet the moment.
Democracy Docket is fearlessly independent and unapologetically pro-democracy.
It will not back down.
It will never obey.Join at: https://www.democracydocket.com/me-subscribe-bsky/
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3lg6nywq4rs23
-
@marcelias
founded #Democracy #Docket to expose GOP attacks on democracy.When Trump takes office, it will step-up to meet the moment.
Democracy Docket is fearlessly independent and unapologetically pro-democracy.
It will not back down.
It will never obey.Join at: https://www.democracydocket.com/me-subscribe-bsky/
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3lg6nywq4rs23
-
@marcelias
founded #Democracy #Docket to expose GOP attacks on democracy.When Trump takes office, it will step-up to meet the moment.
Democracy Docket is fearlessly independent and unapologetically pro-democracy.
It will not back down.
It will never obey.Join at: https://www.democracydocket.com/me-subscribe-bsky/
https://bsky.app/profile/marcelias.bsky.social/post/3lg6nywq4rs23