home.social

#dcms — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #dcms, aggregated by home.social.

  1. What The New UK Government’s £30M Games Funding Means For Scotland

    This week’s announcement of a £30 million Games Growth Package by the UK Government marks a significant moment of recognition for the interactive sector. With the doubling of the UK Games Fund (UKGF) to £28.5 million and the introduction of grants up to £250,000, Westminster has finally acknowledged the importance (and potential) of the £8.8 billion consumer market. However, while this capital injection is a vital down payment for de-risking new intellectual property, it is not a complete strategy for the future of the Scottish supercluster.

    For Scotland, this news has a deep resonance. The UK Games Fund was born in Dundee, emerging from the Dare to be Digital programme at Abertay University. It is a Scottish success story that has been exported to the rest of the UK. Yet, the physical location of the fund in Dundee does not offer an inherent advantage to Scottish studios. Without a formalised national strategy to interface with this capital, Scotland risks acting as a landlord for a UK asset rather than a primary beneficiary of its expansion.

    The limitation of the DCMS package lies in its ‘industry’ focus. As Nick Poole, CEO of UKIE, noted: “Targeted support across the development pipeline will help studios start, scale and stay globally competitive.” This vision remains firmly trapped within the consumer games market, which remains hugely volatile and increasingly competitive. It focuses on the entertainment side of games, while ignoring the wider ecosystem of interactive technology. It won’t address the sectoral isolation that keeps games expertise separated from the rest of the Scottish economy.

    Please don’t misunderstand. The money is hugely valuable – and very welcome. However, there are a number of challenges facing the games sector, which the funding alone cannot solve. The industry is currently facing an oversupply of graduates, a lack of entry-level positions, and ongoing global market volatility. Throwing capital at studios without providing the commercial scaffolding required to build sustainable businesses is a high-risk approach. This is why the National Games Action Plan is essential. While the UK Government funding provides the fuel, the Action Plan provides the road, and the guidebook for the journey.

    Projects like the Hello World! Startup Summit have already proven that we can transform a vulnerable talent pool into a resilient wave of new founders. By providing dedicated, games-specific business support alongside funding, we ensure that studios do not just survive a grant period but scale into the kind of high-growth companies Scotland needs.

    With the Scottish Parliament now in recess and the election period beginning, the next administration faces a clear challenge. The UK Government has set the pace with this Growth Package. Scotland must now build upon it. While this new funding could be used to match-fund successful Scottish UKGF applications, the most critical single action remains strategic alignment – recognition of games as a key sector for Scotland’s future, building understanding of the whole games ecosystem across government and appointing a Chief Games Officer (CGO).

    A CGO would provide the accountability and leadership required to elevate games across every portfolio of the Scottish Government. This role would enable the country to engage more successfully with UK-level funding while ensuring that our £151,382 GVA-per-head productivity is leveraged across areas including healthcare, energy, fintech, data, tech and education.

    The goal is to establish a £1 billion supercluster by 2030. The DCMS announcement is a very welcome boost, but it does not remove the fundamental structural issues facing the sector. To move beyond the silo and achieve true national impact, the incoming Scottish Government must implement the Games Action Plan. The capital is now on the table – it is time for the strategic delivery to begin and for games to become an integral part of Scotland’s digital future.

    #DCMS #funding #games #GamesAction #GamesActionPlan #LevelUp #LondonGamesFest #scotland #ukGamesFund
  2. What The New UK Government’s £30M Games Funding Means For Scotland

    This week’s announcement of a £30 million Games Growth Package by the UK Government marks a significant moment of recognition for the interactive sector. With the doubling of the UK Games Fund (UKGF) to £28.5 million and the introduction of grants up to £250,000, Westminster has finally acknowledged the importance (and potential) of the £8.8 billion consumer market. However, while this capital injection is a vital down payment for de-risking new intellectual property, it is not a complete strategy for the future of the Scottish supercluster.

    For Scotland, this news has a deep resonance. The UK Games Fund was born in Dundee, emerging from the Dare to be Digital programme at Abertay University. It is a Scottish success story that has been exported to the rest of the UK. Yet, the physical location of the fund in Dundee does not offer an inherent advantage to Scottish studios. Without a formalised national strategy to interface with this capital, Scotland risks acting as a landlord for a UK asset rather than a primary beneficiary of its expansion.

    The limitation of the DCMS package lies in its ‘industry’ focus. As Nick Poole, CEO of UKIE, noted: “Targeted support across the development pipeline will help studios start, scale and stay globally competitive.” This vision remains firmly trapped within the consumer games market, which remains hugely volatile and increasingly competitive. It focuses on the entertainment side of games, while ignoring the wider ecosystem of interactive technology. It won’t address the sectoral isolation that keeps games expertise separated from the rest of the Scottish economy.

    Please don’t misunderstand. The money is hugely valuable – and very welcome. However, there are a number of challenges facing the games sector, which the funding alone cannot solve. The industry is currently facing an oversupply of graduates, a lack of entry-level positions, and ongoing global market volatility. Throwing capital at studios without providing the commercial scaffolding required to build sustainable businesses is a high-risk approach. This is why the National Games Action Plan is essential. While the UK Government funding provides the fuel, the Action Plan provides the road, and the guidebook for the journey.

    Projects like the Hello World! Startup Summit have already proven that we can transform a vulnerable talent pool into a resilient wave of new founders. By providing dedicated, games-specific business support alongside funding, we ensure that studios do not just survive a grant period but scale into the kind of high-growth companies Scotland needs.

    With the Scottish Parliament now in recess and the election period beginning, the next administration faces a clear challenge. The UK Government has set the pace with this Growth Package. Scotland must now build upon it. While this new funding could be used to match-fund successful Scottish UKGF applications, the most critical single action remains strategic alignment – recognition of games as a key sector for Scotland’s future, building understanding of the whole games ecosystem across government and appointing a Chief Games Officer (CGO).

    A CGO would provide the accountability and leadership required to elevate games across every portfolio of the Scottish Government. This role would enable the country to engage more successfully with UK-level funding while ensuring that our £151,382 GVA-per-head productivity is leveraged across areas including healthcare, energy, fintech, data, tech and education.

    The goal is to establish a £1 billion supercluster by 2030. The DCMS announcement is a very welcome boost, but it does not remove the fundamental structural issues facing the sector. To move beyond the silo and achieve true national impact, the incoming Scottish Government must implement the Games Action Plan. The capital is now on the table – it is time for the strategic delivery to begin and for games to become an integral part of Scotland’s digital future.

    #DCMS #funding #games #GamesAction #GamesActionPlan #LevelUp #LondonGamesFest #scotland #ukGamesFund
  3. What The New UK Government’s £30M Games Funding Means For Scotland

    This week’s announcement of a £30 million Games Growth Package by the UK Government marks a significant moment of recognition for the interactive sector. With the doubling of the UK Games Fund (UKGF) to £28.5 million and the introduction of grants up to £250,000, Westminster has finally acknowledged the importance (and potential) of the £8.8 billion consumer market. However, while this capital injection is a vital down payment for de-risking new intellectual property, it is not a complete strategy for the future of the Scottish supercluster.

    For Scotland, this news has a deep resonance. The UK Games Fund was born in Dundee, emerging from the Dare to be Digital programme at Abertay University. It is a Scottish success story that has been exported to the rest of the UK. Yet, the physical location of the fund in Dundee does not offer an inherent advantage to Scottish studios. Without a formalised national strategy to interface with this capital, Scotland risks acting as a landlord for a UK asset rather than a primary beneficiary of its expansion.

    The limitation of the DCMS package lies in its ‘industry’ focus. As Nick Poole, CEO of UKIE, noted: “Targeted support across the development pipeline will help studios start, scale and stay globally competitive.” This vision remains firmly trapped within the consumer games market, which remains hugely volatile and increasingly competitive. It focuses on the entertainment side of games, while ignoring the wider ecosystem of interactive technology. It won’t address the sectoral isolation that keeps games expertise separated from the rest of the Scottish economy.

    Please don’t misunderstand. The money is hugely valuable – and very welcome. However, there are a number of challenges facing the games sector, which the funding alone cannot solve. The industry is currently facing an oversupply of graduates, a lack of entry-level positions, and ongoing global market volatility. Throwing capital at studios without providing the commercial scaffolding required to build sustainable businesses is a high-risk approach. This is why the National Games Action Plan is essential. While the UK Government funding provides the fuel, the Action Plan provides the road, and the guidebook for the journey.

    Projects like the Hello World! Startup Summit have already proven that we can transform a vulnerable talent pool into a resilient wave of new founders. By providing dedicated, games-specific business support alongside funding, we ensure that studios do not just survive a grant period but scale into the kind of high-growth companies Scotland needs.

    With the Scottish Parliament now in recess and the election period beginning, the next administration faces a clear challenge. The UK Government has set the pace with this Growth Package. Scotland must now build upon it. While this new funding could be used to match-fund successful Scottish UKGF applications, the most critical single action remains strategic alignment – recognition of games as a key sector for Scotland’s future, building understanding of the whole games ecosystem across government and appointing a Chief Games Officer (CGO).

    A CGO would provide the accountability and leadership required to elevate games across every portfolio of the Scottish Government. This role would enable the country to engage more successfully with UK-level funding while ensuring that our £151,382 GVA-per-head productivity is leveraged across areas including healthcare, energy, fintech, data, tech and education.

    The goal is to establish a £1 billion supercluster by 2030. The DCMS announcement is a very welcome boost, but it does not remove the fundamental structural issues facing the sector. To move beyond the silo and achieve true national impact, the incoming Scottish Government must implement the Games Action Plan. The capital is now on the table – it is time for the strategic delivery to begin and for games to become an integral part of Scotland’s digital future.

    #DCMS #funding #games #GamesAction #GamesActionPlan #LevelUp #LondonGamesFest #scotland #ukGamesFund
  4. What The New UK Government’s £30M Games Funding Means For Scotland

    This week’s announcement of a £30 million Games Growth Package by the UK Government marks a significant moment of recognition for the interactive sector. With the doubling of the UK Games Fund (UKGF) to £28.5 million and the introduction of grants up to £250,000, Westminster has finally acknowledged the importance (and potential) of the £8.8 billion consumer market. However, while this capital injection is a vital down payment for de-risking new intellectual property, it is not a complete strategy for the future of the Scottish supercluster.

    For Scotland, this news has a deep resonance. The UK Games Fund was born in Dundee, emerging from the Dare to be Digital programme at Abertay University. It is a Scottish success story that has been exported to the rest of the UK. Yet, the physical location of the fund in Dundee does not offer an inherent advantage to Scottish studios. Without a formalised national strategy to interface with this capital, Scotland risks acting as a landlord for a UK asset rather than a primary beneficiary of its expansion.

    The limitation of the DCMS package lies in its ‘industry’ focus. As Nick Poole, CEO of UKIE, noted: “Targeted support across the development pipeline will help studios start, scale and stay globally competitive.” This vision remains firmly trapped within the consumer games market, which remains hugely volatile and increasingly competitive. It focuses on the entertainment side of games, while ignoring the wider ecosystem of interactive technology. It won’t address the sectoral isolation that keeps games expertise separated from the rest of the Scottish economy.

    Please don’t misunderstand. The money is hugely valuable – and very welcome. However, there are a number of challenges facing the games sector, which the funding alone cannot solve. The industry is currently facing an oversupply of graduates, a lack of entry-level positions, and ongoing global market volatility. Throwing capital at studios without providing the commercial scaffolding required to build sustainable businesses is a high-risk approach. This is why the National Games Action Plan is essential. While the UK Government funding provides the fuel, the Action Plan provides the road, and the guidebook for the journey.

    Projects like the Hello World! Startup Summit have already proven that we can transform a vulnerable talent pool into a resilient wave of new founders. By providing dedicated, games-specific business support alongside funding, we ensure that studios do not just survive a grant period but scale into the kind of high-growth companies Scotland needs.

    With the Scottish Parliament now in recess and the election period beginning, the next administration faces a clear challenge. The UK Government has set the pace with this Growth Package. Scotland must now build upon it. While this new funding could be used to match-fund successful Scottish UKGF applications, the most critical single action remains strategic alignment – recognition of games as a key sector for Scotland’s future, building understanding of the whole games ecosystem across government and appointing a Chief Games Officer (CGO).

    A CGO would provide the accountability and leadership required to elevate games across every portfolio of the Scottish Government. This role would enable the country to engage more successfully with UK-level funding while ensuring that our £151,382 GVA-per-head productivity is leveraged across areas including healthcare, energy, fintech, data, tech and education.

    The goal is to establish a £1 billion supercluster by 2030. The DCMS announcement is a very welcome boost, but it does not remove the fundamental structural issues facing the sector. To move beyond the silo and achieve true national impact, the incoming Scottish Government must implement the Games Action Plan. The capital is now on the table – it is time for the strategic delivery to begin and for games to become an integral part of Scotland’s digital future.

    #DCMS #funding #games #GamesAction #GamesActionPlan #LevelUp #LondonGamesFest #scotland #ukGamesFund
  5. What The New UK Government’s £30M Games Funding Means For Scotland

    This week’s announcement of a £30 million Games Growth Package by the UK Government marks a significant moment of recognition for the interactive sector. With the doubling of the UK Games Fund (UKGF) to £28.5 million and the introduction of grants up to £250,000, Westminster has finally acknowledged the importance (and potential) of the £8.8 billion consumer market. However, while this capital injection is a vital down payment for de-risking new intellectual property, it is not a complete strategy for the future of the Scottish supercluster.

    For Scotland, this news has a deep resonance. The UK Games Fund was born in Dundee, emerging from the Dare to be Digital programme at Abertay University. It is a Scottish success story that has been exported to the rest of the UK. Yet, the physical location of the fund in Dundee does not offer an inherent advantage to Scottish studios. Without a formalised national strategy to interface with this capital, Scotland risks acting as a landlord for a UK asset rather than a primary beneficiary of its expansion.

    The limitation of the DCMS package lies in its ‘industry’ focus. As Nick Poole, CEO of UKIE, noted: “Targeted support across the development pipeline will help studios start, scale and stay globally competitive.” This vision remains firmly trapped within the consumer games market, which remains hugely volatile and increasingly competitive. It focuses on the entertainment side of games, while ignoring the wider ecosystem of interactive technology. It won’t address the sectoral isolation that keeps games expertise separated from the rest of the Scottish economy.

    Please don’t misunderstand. The money is hugely valuable – and very welcome. However, there are a number of challenges facing the games sector, which the funding alone cannot solve. The industry is currently facing an oversupply of graduates, a lack of entry-level positions, and ongoing global market volatility. Throwing capital at studios without providing the commercial scaffolding required to build sustainable businesses is a high-risk approach. This is why the National Games Action Plan is essential. While the UK Government funding provides the fuel, the Action Plan provides the road, and the guidebook for the journey.

    Projects like the Hello World! Startup Summit have already proven that we can transform a vulnerable talent pool into a resilient wave of new founders. By providing dedicated, games-specific business support alongside funding, we ensure that studios do not just survive a grant period but scale into the kind of high-growth companies Scotland needs.

    With the Scottish Parliament now in recess and the election period beginning, the next administration faces a clear challenge. The UK Government has set the pace with this Growth Package. Scotland must now build upon it. While this new funding could be used to match-fund successful Scottish UKGF applications, the most critical single action remains strategic alignment – recognition of games as a key sector for Scotland’s future, building understanding of the whole games ecosystem across government and appointing a Chief Games Officer (CGO).

    A CGO would provide the accountability and leadership required to elevate games across every portfolio of the Scottish Government. This role would enable the country to engage more successfully with UK-level funding while ensuring that our £151,382 GVA-per-head productivity is leveraged across areas including healthcare, energy, fintech, data, tech and education.

    The goal is to establish a £1 billion supercluster by 2030. The DCMS announcement is a very welcome boost, but it does not remove the fundamental structural issues facing the sector. To move beyond the silo and achieve true national impact, the incoming Scottish Government must implement the Games Action Plan. The capital is now on the table – it is time for the strategic delivery to begin and for games to become an integral part of Scotland’s digital future.

    #DCMS #funding #games #GamesAction #GamesActionPlan #LevelUp #LondonGamesFest #scotland #ukGamesFund
  6. The upcoming DCMS that will be used in qr payment for BRICS participants will be decentralized and open source compared to Swift. At least on paper (see chart) it looks interesting and promising #dcms #brics #opensource #crossborder #payment #decentralized #qrpay #b2b

  7. The upcoming DCMS that will be used in qr payment for BRICS participants will be decentralized and open source compared to Swift. At least on paper (see chart) it looks interesting and promising #dcms #brics #opensource #crossborder #payment #decentralized #qrpay #b2b

  8. The upcoming DCMS that will be used in qr payment for BRICS participants will be decentralized and open source compared to Swift. At least on paper (see chart) it looks interesting and promising #dcms #brics #opensource #crossborder #payment #decentralized #qrpay #b2b

  9. The upcoming DCMS that will be used in qr payment for BRICS participants will be decentralized and open source compared to Swift. At least on paper (see chart) it looks interesting and promising #dcms #brics #opensource #crossborder #payment #decentralized #qrpay #b2b

  10. The upcoming DCMS that will be used in qr payment for BRICS participants will be decentralized and open source compared to Swift. At least on paper (see chart) it looks interesting and promising #dcms #brics #opensource #crossborder #payment #decentralized #qrpay #b2b

  11. I am not certain what this portends but it suggests that the separation of DCMS & DSIT a few months ago may have been considered problematic by Labour

    Chris Bryant has picked up both departments and it’s like 2020 all over again?

    https://twitter.com/DCMS/status/1810249978767384606

    https://alecmuffett.com/article/110006

    #dcms #dsit #internet #regulation

  12. I am not certain what this portends but it suggests that the separation of DCMS & DSIT a few months ago may have been considered problematic by Labour

    Chris Bryant has picked up both departments and it’s like 2020 all over again?

    https://twitter.com/DCMS/status/1810249978767384606

    https://alecmuffett.com/article/110006

    #dcms #dsit #internet #regulation

  13. I am not certain what this portends but it suggests that the separation of DCMS & DSIT a few months ago may have been considered problematic by Labour

    Chris Bryant has picked up both departments and it’s like 2020 all over again?

    https://twitter.com/DCMS/status/1810249978767384606

    https://alecmuffett.com/article/110006

    #dcms #dsit #internet #regulation

  14. I am not certain what this portends but it suggests that the separation of DCMS & DSIT a few months ago may have been considered problematic by Labour

    Chris Bryant has picked up both departments and it’s like 2020 all over again?

    https://twitter.com/DCMS/status/1810249978767384606

    https://alecmuffett.com/article/110006

    #dcms #dsit #internet #regulation

  15. Interesting that Lisa Nandy’s got the #DCMS brief, which suggests a continuing emphasis on #LevellingUp for #culture.

  16. We received a letter "On His Majesty's Service" allegedly from #DCMS asking us to take part in something called the #CommunityLifeSurvey. There's no link to a .gov.uk site to verify it.

    I have found a DCMS page referencing the survey domain name, so I'm now happy it's legit. But it's damn sloppy to send this out without a way for a non-nerd to verify it's not a postal #phishing attack.

  17. We received a letter "On His Majesty's Service" allegedly from #DCMS asking us to take part in something called the #CommunityLifeSurvey. There's no link to a .gov.uk site to verify it.

    I have found a DCMS page referencing the survey domain name, so I'm now happy it's legit. But it's damn sloppy to send this out without a way for a non-nerd to verify it's not a postal #phishing attack.

  18. We received a letter "On His Majesty's Service" allegedly from #DCMS asking us to take part in something called the #CommunityLifeSurvey. There's no link to a .gov.uk site to verify it.

    I have found a DCMS page referencing the survey domain name, so I'm now happy it's legit. But it's damn sloppy to send this out without a way for a non-nerd to verify it's not a postal #phishing attack.

  19. We received a letter "On His Majesty's Service" allegedly from #DCMS asking us to take part in something called the #CommunityLifeSurvey. There's no link to a .gov.uk site to verify it.

    I have found a DCMS page referencing the survey domain name, so I'm now happy it's legit. But it's damn sloppy to send this out without a way for a non-nerd to verify it's not a postal #phishing attack.

  20. We received a letter "On His Majesty's Service" allegedly from #DCMS asking us to take part in something called the #CommunityLifeSurvey. There's no link to a .gov.uk site to verify it.

    I have found a DCMS page referencing the survey domain name, so I'm now happy it's legit. But it's damn sloppy to send this out without a way for a non-nerd to verify it's not a postal #phishing attack.

  21. We responded to the DCMS consultation on Analogue Community Radio Licensing, noting several flaws in the assumptions behind the consultation, and advocating for greater protections for truly community-run providers. Read a summary here:

    bettermedia.uk/2024/02/01/subm

    #DCMS #communityradio #communitymedia #analogue

  22. This week research from the #IPPR published by @guardian showed £15bn worth of publicly owned assets have been #SoldFromUnderYou since 2010 - while only a fraction of the £300m
    #DCMS #YouthInvestmentFund and £150m #DLUHC
    #CommunityOwnershipFund has been awarded to renew and rebuild community infrastructure.Don't let the buildings you love become another statistic #SaveOurSpaces #SaveJWB
    fundsurfer.com/crowdfund/jacob Artwork by Amy Hutchings

  23. This week research from the #IPPR published by @guardian showed £15bn worth of publicly owned assets have been #SoldFromUnderYou since 2010 - while only a fraction of the £300m
    #DCMS #YouthInvestmentFund and £150m #DLUHC
    #CommunityOwnershipFund has been awarded to renew and rebuild community infrastructure.Don't let the buildings you love become another statistic #SaveOurSpaces #SaveJWB
    fundsurfer.com/crowdfund/jacob Artwork by Amy Hutchings

  24. This week research from the #IPPR published by @guardian showed £15bn worth of publicly owned assets have been #SoldFromUnderYou since 2010 - while only a fraction of the £300m
    #DCMS #YouthInvestmentFund and £150m #DLUHC
    #CommunityOwnershipFund has been awarded to renew and rebuild community infrastructure.Don't let the buildings you love become another statistic #SaveOurSpaces #SaveJWB
    fundsurfer.com/crowdfund/jacob Artwork by Amy Hutchings

  25. This week research from the #IPPR published by @guardian showed £15bn worth of publicly owned assets have been #SoldFromUnderYou since 2010 - while only a fraction of the £300m
    #DCMS #YouthInvestmentFund and £150m #DLUHC
    #CommunityOwnershipFund has been awarded to renew and rebuild community infrastructure.Don't let the buildings you love become another statistic #SaveOurSpaces #SaveJWB
    fundsurfer.com/crowdfund/jacob Artwork by Amy Hutchings

  26. This week research from the #IPPR published by @guardian showed £15bn worth of publicly owned assets have been #SoldFromUnderYou since 2010 - while only a fraction of the £300m
    #DCMS #YouthInvestmentFund and £150m #DLUHC
    #CommunityOwnershipFund has been awarded to renew and rebuild community infrastructure.Don't let the buildings you love become another statistic #SaveOurSpaces #SaveJWB
    fundsurfer.com/crowdfund/jacob Artwork by Amy Hutchings

  27. For those interested in the appointment of the BBC chair, here's the report: publicappointmentscommissioner
    It seems that #DCMS gave advice to Oliver Dowden, then Sec of State for DCMS that he chose not to take.

  28. MP John Nicolson asks Ofcom:

    How come Tory MPs are interviewing the Tory Chancellor on GBNews?

    #Ofcom rules are clear. MPs may not present the news or conduct political interviews.

    He challenged the Ofcom boss today in the Culture Select Committee- are you satisfied with the answer?

    #CommonsDCMS #johnnicolson #dcms #GBNews #jeremyhunt #gtto #estherMcvey #philDavis

  29. Nice to be so early to something you create a paradox…

    #DCMS

  30. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee has just published a letter to Michelle Donelan (Secretary of State for #DCMS) following on from the hearing last week. It is pretty critical of the #MinisterialPowers the explanation for which it described as "vague, speculative and unconvincing". This was directed mainly at cl 39 #OnlineSafetyBill but also cl 157
    Other issues concerned Parliamentary oversight, risk assessments and transparency. See here
    committees.parliament.uk/publi

  31. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee has just published a letter to Michelle Donelan (Secretary of State for #DCMS) following on from the hearing last week. It is pretty critical of the #MinisterialPowers the explanation for which it described as "vague, speculative and unconvincing". This was directed mainly at cl 39 #OnlineSafetyBill but also cl 157
    Other issues concerned Parliamentary oversight, risk assessments and transparency. See here
    committees.parliament.uk/publi

  32. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee has just published a letter to Michelle Donelan (Secretary of State for #DCMS) following on from the hearing last week. It is pretty critical of the #MinisterialPowers the explanation for which it described as "vague, speculative and unconvincing". This was directed mainly at cl 39 #OnlineSafetyBill but also cl 157
    Other issues concerned Parliamentary oversight, risk assessments and transparency. See here
    committees.parliament.uk/publi

  33. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee has just published a letter to Michelle Donelan (Secretary of State for #DCMS) following on from the hearing last week. It is pretty critical of the #MinisterialPowers the explanation for which it described as "vague, speculative and unconvincing". This was directed mainly at cl 39 #OnlineSafetyBill but also cl 157
    Other issues concerned Parliamentary oversight, risk assessments and transparency. See here
    committees.parliament.uk/publi

  34. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee has just published a letter to Michelle Donelan (Secretary of State for #DCMS) following on from the hearing last week. It is pretty critical of the #MinisterialPowers the explanation for which it described as "vague, speculative and unconvincing". This was directed mainly at cl 39 #OnlineSafetyBill but also cl 157
    Other issues concerned Parliamentary oversight, risk assessments and transparency. See here
    committees.parliament.uk/publi

  35. For fans of ParliamentTV more must view stuff tomorrow when the Commons #DCMS Select Committee are "hosting" Julia Lopez, the Minister for Media, Data, and Digital Infrastructure. The Committee intends to ask about #DataProtection and #CyberSecurity as well as support for the #DigitalEconomy. She will be supported by a couple of civil servants: Erika Lewis, Director, Cyber Security and Digital Identity; and Sam Cannicott, Deputy Director and Head of the Office for #AI
    parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/

  36. Although I don’t have much sympathy for all opinions or people within, the new @BigBrotherWatch report on UK gov’s #DCMS hiring out monitoring companies to act as #TrustedFlaggers for #disinformation/ #misinformation has important implications for #platformRegulation. Research done through #FOI and #SARs. Examples include requesting friends-only posts to be removed because apparently posting locations of testing centres would breach the GDPR… bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-cont

  37. Although I don’t have much sympathy for all opinions or people within, the new @BigBrotherWatch report on UK gov’s #DCMS hiring out monitoring companies to act as #TrustedFlaggers for #disinformation/ #misinformation has important implications for #platformRegulation. Research done through #FOI and #SARs. Examples include requesting friends-only posts to be removed because apparently posting locations of testing centres would breach the GDPR… bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-cont