#barrister — Public Fediverse posts

“PALESTINE ACTION BARRISTER WINS APPEAL IN CONTEMPT CASE”

by Dania Akkad in Declassified UK

@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@iran

“A leading human rights barrister has won his appeal against contempt of court proceedings, which were levelled at him for a closing speech in the trial of Palestine Action activists.

The court of appeal’s ruling on Tuesday in the case of Rajiv Menon KC comes as it has also emerged that four of the defendants found guilty in a retrial can be sentenced as terrorists”

https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-barrister-wins-appeal-in-contempt-case/

#Press #SocialMedia #UK #PalestineAction #Barrister #Appeal #Menon #ContemptOfCourt #Terrorism #Filton6 #ShowTrial #KangarooCourt #Starmer #Labour #Dictatorship #PalestinianGenocide #Israel #Gaza

“PALESTINE ACTION BARRISTER WINS APPEAL IN CONTEMPT CASE”

by Dania Akkad in Declassified UK

@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@iran

“A leading human rights barrister has won his appeal against contempt of court proceedings, which were levelled at him for a closing speech in the trial of Palestine Action activists.

The court of appeal’s ruling on Tuesday in the case of Rajiv Menon KC comes as it has also emerged that four of the defendants found guilty in a retrial can be sentenced as terrorists”

https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-barrister-wins-appeal-in-contempt-case/

#Press #SocialMedia #UK #PalestineAction #Barrister #Appeal #Menon #ContemptOfCourt #Terrorism #Filton6 #ShowTrial #KangarooCourt #Starmer #Labour #Dictatorship #PalestinianGenocide #Israel #Gaza

“PALESTINE ACTION BARRISTER WINS APPEAL IN CONTEMPT CASE”

by Dania Akkad in Declassified UK

@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@iran

“A leading human rights barrister has won his appeal against contempt of court proceedings, which were levelled at him for a closing speech in the trial of Palestine Action activists.

The court of appeal’s ruling on Tuesday in the case of Rajiv Menon KC comes as it has also emerged that four of the defendants found guilty in a retrial can be sentenced as terrorists”

https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-barrister-wins-appeal-in-contempt-case/

#Press #SocialMedia #UK #PalestineAction #Barrister #Appeal #Menon #ContemptOfCourt #Terrorism #Filton6 #ShowTrial #KangarooCourt #Starmer #Labour #Dictatorship #PalestinianGenocide #Israel #Gaza

“PALESTINE ACTION BARRISTER WINS APPEAL IN CONTEMPT CASE”

by Dania Akkad in Declassified UK

@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@iran

“A leading human rights barrister has won his appeal against contempt of court proceedings, which were levelled at him for a closing speech in the trial of Palestine Action activists.

The court of appeal’s ruling on Tuesday in the case of Rajiv Menon KC comes as it has also emerged that four of the defendants found guilty in a retrial can be sentenced as terrorists”

https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-barrister-wins-appeal-in-contempt-case/

#Press #SocialMedia #UK #PalestineAction #Barrister #Appeal #Menon #ContemptOfCourt #Terrorism #Filton6 #ShowTrial #KangarooCourt #Starmer #Labour #Dictatorship #PalestinianGenocide #Israel #Gaza

“PALESTINE ACTION BARRISTER WINS APPEAL IN CONTEMPT CASE”

by Dania Akkad in Declassified UK

@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@iran

“A leading human rights barrister has won his appeal against contempt of court proceedings, which were levelled at him for a closing speech in the trial of Palestine Action activists.

The court of appeal’s ruling on Tuesday in the case of Rajiv Menon KC comes as it has also emerged that four of the defendants found guilty in a retrial can be sentenced as terrorists”

https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-barrister-wins-appeal-in-contempt-case/

#Press #SocialMedia #UK #PalestineAction #Barrister #Appeal #Menon #ContemptOfCourt #Terrorism #Filton6 #ShowTrial #KangarooCourt #Starmer #Labour #Dictatorship #PalestinianGenocide #Israel #Gaza

“Barrister's powerful speech at #FiltonTrial reminds jury of its right to defy judge”

by Jonathan Cook on Substack

@uk_politics
@[email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected]

“#Starmer and the #media need convictions to justify Palestine Action's proscription as a terrorist group. Rajiv Menon KC spells out to the jury why it is a vital last defence against government tyranny”

https://open.substack.com/pub/jonathancook/p/barristers-powerful-speech-at-filton

#Press #UK #Barrister #Speech #Menon #PalestineAction #Proscription #Terrorism #AbuseOfPower #VichyMedia

“Barrister's powerful speech at #FiltonTrial reminds jury of its right to defy judge”

by Jonathan Cook on Substack

@uk_politics
@[email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected]

“#Starmer and the #media need convictions to justify Palestine Action's proscription as a terrorist group. Rajiv Menon KC spells out to the jury why it is a vital last defence against government tyranny”

https://open.substack.com/pub/jonathancook/p/barristers-powerful-speech-at-filton

#Press #UK #Barrister #Speech #Menon #PalestineAction #Proscription #Terrorism #AbuseOfPower #VichyMedia

Sir Nikhilesh Dutta (born January 5, 1939) is a Bangladeshi #barrister who was #calledToTheBar as a Member of the Honourable Society of the #InnerTemple, #London, England. For his contribution in promoting inter-religious harmony, he was conferred with a #knighthood as a #KnightBachelor by #QueenElizabethII in 2007. Dutta, with a legal practice in the #SupremeCourtOfBangladesh, was the first national who was called to the Bar as a barrister on 8 February 1972 from independent Bangladesh.

Do I know any #English lawyers?

Nothing bad, I am just curious how someone would get case documents out of the court system for a tribunal I did back in 2014 - Since I assume those documents are "public" now.

#UK #Law #Solicitor #Barrister #Courts #Procedure #Legal #Vogon #Basement #Storage #System

Do I know any #English lawyers?

Nothing bad, I am just curious how someone would get case documents out of the court system for a tribunal I did back in 2014 - Since I assume those documents are "public" now.

#UK #Law #Solicitor #Barrister #Courts #Procedure #Legal #Vogon #Basement #Storage #System

Do I know any #English lawyers?

Nothing bad, I am just curious how someone would get case documents out of the court system for a tribunal I did back in 2014 - Since I assume those documents are "public" now.

#UK #Law #Solicitor #Barrister #Courts #Procedure #Legal #Vogon #Basement #Storage #System

Do I know any #English lawyers?

Nothing bad, I am just curious how someone would get case documents out of the court system for a tribunal I did back in 2014 - Since I assume those documents are "public" now.

#UK #Law #Solicitor #Barrister #Courts #Procedure #Legal #Vogon #Basement #Storage #System

literally what the fuck does this even mean?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/indefinite-leave-to-remain-in-the-uk#your-biometric-residence-permit-brp

If you were curious about my legal permission to breathe within this un-submerged Earthling solid angle,
it's that.

If any UK book botherers want to enlighten me, please do.
Thank you for exactly zero legal advice in advance.

I will not be relying on it at all. (And frankly am at non-zero chance of forgetting it soon after.)

It is my understanding I'll maintain the same status but lapsed proof.

It is my experience and expectation that I'll become undocumented, and therefore human scum [sic].

#legal #law #lawyer #paralegal #barrister #appellant #judiciary #jurisprudence #court #CrownCourt #solicitor #immigration #migrant #emigrant #immigrate #immigrant #immigrants #ImmigrantLife #UK #British #English #UnitedKingdom #GreatBritain #TERFisland

literally what the fuck does this even mean?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/indefinite-leave-to-remain-in-the-uk#your-biometric-residence-permit-brp

If you were curious about my legal permission to breathe within this un-submerged Earthling solid angle,
it's that.

If any UK book botherers want to enlighten me, please do.
Thank you for exactly zero legal advice in advance.

I will not be relying on it at all. (And frankly am at non-zero chance of forgetting it soon after.)

It is my understanding I'll be the same status but lapsed proof.

It is my experience and expectation that I'll be undocumented, and therefore human scum.

#legal #law #lawyer #paralegal #barrister #appellant #judiciary #jurisprudence #court #CrownCourt #solicitor

literally what the fuck does this even mean?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/indefinite-leave-to-remain-in-the-uk#your-biometric-residence-permit-brp

If you were curious about my legal permission to breathe within this un-submerged Earthling solid angle,
it's that.

If any UK book botherers want to enlighten me, please do.
Thank you for exactly zero legal advice in advance.

I will not be relying on it at all. (And frankly am at non-zero chance of forgetting it soon after.)

It is my understanding I'll maintain the same status but lapsed proof.

It is my experience and expectation that I'll become undocumented, and therefore human scum [sic].

#legal #law #lawyer #paralegal #barrister #appellant #judiciary #jurisprudence #court #CrownCourt #solicitor #immigration #migrant #emigrant #immigrate #immigrant #immigrants #ImmigrantLife #UK #British #English #UnitedKingdom #GreatBritain #TERFisland

literally what the fuck does this even mean?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/indefinite-leave-to-remain-in-the-uk#your-biometric-residence-permit-brp

If you were curious about my legal permission to breathe within this un-submerged Earthling solid angle,
it's that.

If any UK book botherers want to enlighten me, please do.
Thank you for exactly zero legal advice in advance.

I will not be relying on it at all. (And frankly am at non-zero chance of forgetting it soon after.)

It is my understanding I'll maintain the same status but lapsed proof.

It is my experience and expectation that I'll become undocumented, and therefore human scum [sic].

#legal #law #lawyer #paralegal #barrister #appellant #judiciary #jurisprudence #court #CrownCourt #solicitor #immigration #migrant #emigrant #immigrate #immigrant #immigrants #ImmigrantLife #UK #British #English #UnitedKingdom #GreatBritain #TERFisland

literally what the fuck does this even mean?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/indefinite-leave-to-remain-in-the-uk#your-biometric-residence-permit-brp

If you were curious about my legal permission to breathe within this un-submerged Earthling solid angle,
it's that.

If any UK book botherers want to enlighten me, please do.
Thank you for exactly zero legal advice in advance.

I will not be relying on it at all. (And frankly am at non-zero chance of forgetting it soon after.)

It is my understanding I'll maintain the same status but lapsed proof.

It is my experience and expectation that I'll become undocumented, and therefore human scum [sic].

#legal #law #lawyer #paralegal #barrister #appellant #judiciary #jurisprudence #court #CrownCourt #solicitor #immigration #migrant #emigrant #immigrate #immigrant #immigrants #ImmigrantLife #UK #British #English #UnitedKingdom #GreatBritain #TERFisland

In our increasingly digital world, the boundaries of free speech and expression are continually tested, often with significant legal implications. A recent case in the UK highlights the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the potential legal consequences of online posts. A woman was sentenced to 20 months in prison for a Facebook post, leading many to question the limits of their own online expressions.

The right to freedom of expression, enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), is a qualified right. This means that while individuals are free to express themselves, there are limitations based on the context and potential impact of their expressions. The law allows for restrictions if the expression incites violence, causes needless anxiety, or is persistently annoying.

A notable case in this regard involved a woman named Scotto, who had her conviction quashed after being prosecuted for a series of exchanged tweets. The judgment referenced Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which criminalises the improper use of public electronic communications networks for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, or needless anxiety. The judge clarified that these provisions were not intended to criminalise expressions that are merely annoying or inconvenient.

The case underscores the importance of context and intent in determining the legality of online posts. While persistent harassment through electronic communications can be prosecuted, a single post that annoys someone is unlikely to meet the threshold for criminality unless it incites violence or causes significant harm.

In contrast, the United States offers broader protections for free speech under the First Amendment. This disparity is particularly evident in the context of recent discussions about Elon Musk’s comments on social media. Musk’s remarks about the possibility of civil war in the UK have sparked debate about whether such statements could lead to legal action or even extradition.

Brian Rio, a US attorney, provided an in-depth analysis of the legal landscape surrounding free speech in the US. He highlighted the Brandenburg v. Ohio case, which permits advocacy of violence as long as it does not incite imminent lawless action. According to Rio, Musk’s comments, which warn of potential civil unrest without advocating for it, fall well within the bounds of protected speech in the US.

Rio’s analysis further illustrates the robust protection of free speech in the US, even extending to statements that might be considered inflammatory or provocative. For example, advocating for the violent overthrow of the government or expressing the desirability of war is protected, provided there is no immediate threat or incitement to illegal action.

This stark contrast between the UK and US legal frameworks highlights the challenges of navigating free speech in a globalised digital landscape. While the UK imposes more stringent restrictions to prevent harm and maintain public order, the US upholds a broader interpretation of free speech, prioritising the exchange of ideas and political discourse.

In conclusion, the legal treatment of online expressions varies significantly between jurisdictions, reflecting different cultural and legal priorities. The UK focuses on preventing harm and maintaining public order, while the US prioritises the protection of free speech, even at the risk of allowing provocative statements. Understanding these differences is crucial for navigating the complex and evolving landscape of digital communication.

https://teasmith.au/resource/this-was-eye-opening/

#BlackBeltBarrister #barrister #freeLegalAdvice #freeLegalGuidance #lawyer #tech #TwitterX

We're recruiting for Legal Associates to join our growing immigration team. This is an exciting opportunity for anyone looking to gain or develop experience of UK immigration law. Apply by 31 May 2024.

Full details on our website >>> https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/careers/vacancies/

#ukimmigrationlaw #ukimmigration #immigrationlaw #immigration #lawjobs #legaljobs #paralegaljobs #pupillage #barrister #chambers #richmondchambers

The US backs voluntary agreements in the global AI regulation debate, the EU mandates strict laws, and tech leaders lobby against heavy regulation. The discussion extends to open-source AI versus restricted access, highlighting the tension between fostering innovation and mitigating risks. Key figures use examples like AI deepfakes to influence policy.

#regulation #ai #aiact #us #eu #china #opensource #business #democracy #law #legal #tussle #work #regulatory #lawyer #solicitor #barrister #usa

We are delighted to welcome Maud to our personal immigration team upon successful completion of her pupillage! Maud specialises in all aspects of personal immigration law, including family migration, the EUSS, asylum and human rights. She assists clients with both visa applications and immigration appeals.

Learn more: https://immigrationbarrister.co.uk/about/our-team/maud-foxley/

#immigrationbarrister #barrister #ukimmigration #immigration #immigrationlaw #ukvisa

The Online Safety Bill has sparked a heated debate, with accusations flying about its fairness and legality. Critics worry it might breach privacy rights, particularly concerning encrypted messages. To understand the issue, let’s first clarify what encryption is and why it matters.

Imagine sending a secret letter to a friend, written in a special code only you two understand. You then lock this letter in a box to which only you and your friend have the key. Even if intercepted, the letter remains unreadable without the key. This analogy mirrors how end-to-end encryption works in messaging apps like WhatsApp. Messages are encrypted, ensuring only the sender and recipient can read them, not even the app provider.

The crux of the Online Safety Bill is its requirement for tech platforms to report illegal content within messages sent via their services. This mandate clashes with the principle of end-to-end encryption, which prevents these platforms from scanning messages. If companies are held responsible and fined for not complying, they might be forced to break encryption to scan messages, undermining user privacy.

The Bill aims to balance privacy with safety. On one hand, encrypted messages protect user privacy from potential government surveillance. On the other, encryption can shield criminal activities, such as child exploitation, from detection. Law-abiding citizens would want authorities to have the necessary evidence to prosecute such crimes, but this evidence often lies within encrypted messages.

WhatsApp, for instance, reports apparent child exploitation cases to relevant authorities, but end-to-end encryption limits their ability to comply fully with such requests. The Bill, therefore, faces criticism for potentially forcing technology that doesn’t exist—scanning encrypted messages without breaking encryption.

The dilemma is clear: ensuring privacy versus enabling crime detection. The Bill’s critics argue that legislating technology into existence is unrealistic and could lead to unintended consequences. The debate hinges on whether we prioritise privacy or safety, and finding a middle ground remains elusive.

As the Bill awaits Royal Assent, the discussion continues. The question is: do we value our encrypted privacy more, or do we support measures that might compromise it for the sake of safety? The conversation is ongoing, and public opinion is divided. Let us know where you stand on this critical issue.

https://teasmith.au/resource/online-safety-bill-the-big-debate/

#BlackBeltBarrister #barrister #freeLegalAdvice #freeLegalGuidance #lawyer

The Online Safety Bill has sparked a heated debate, with accusations flying about its fairness and legality. Critics worry it might breach privacy rights, particularly concerning encrypted messages. To understand the issue, let’s first clarify what encryption is and why it matters.

Imagine sending a secret letter to a friend, written in a special code only you two understand. You then lock this letter in a box to which only you and your friend have the key. Even if intercepted, the letter remains unreadable without the key. This analogy mirrors how end-to-end encryption works in messaging apps like WhatsApp. Messages are encrypted, ensuring only the sender and recipient can read them, not even the app provider.

The crux of the Online Safety Bill is its requirement for tech platforms to report illegal content within messages sent via their services. This mandate clashes with the principle of end-to-end encryption, which prevents these platforms from scanning messages. If companies are held responsible and fined for not complying, they might be forced to break encryption to scan messages, undermining user privacy.

The Bill aims to balance privacy with safety. On one hand, encrypted messages protect user privacy from potential government surveillance. On the other, encryption can shield criminal activities, such as child exploitation, from detection. Law-abiding citizens would want authorities to have the necessary evidence to prosecute such crimes, but this evidence often lies within encrypted messages.

WhatsApp, for instance, reports apparent child exploitation cases to relevant authorities, but end-to-end encryption limits their ability to comply fully with such requests. The Bill, therefore, faces criticism for potentially forcing technology that doesn’t exist—scanning encrypted messages without breaking encryption.

The dilemma is clear: ensuring privacy versus enabling crime detection. The Bill’s critics argue that legislating technology into existence is unrealistic and could lead to unintended consequences. The debate hinges on whether we prioritise privacy or safety, and finding a middle ground remains elusive.

As the Bill awaits Royal Assent, the discussion continues. The question is: do we value our encrypted privacy more, or do we support measures that might compromise it for the sake of safety? The conversation is ongoing, and public opinion is divided. Let us know where you stand on this critical issue.

https://teasmith.au/resource/online-safety-bill-the-big-debate/

#BlackBeltBarrister #barrister #freeLegalAdvice #freeLegalGuidance #lawyer

The unfolding saga surrounding Russell Brand is evolving at a remarkable pace, making it challenging to keep up. Brand’s preemptive publication against recent allegations, which he posted before they hit the press, drew a notable response from Elon Musk. Musk commented, “Of course they don’t like competition,” in reply to Brand’s video.

In a direct reaction to Musk’s comment, the Culture, Media, and Sport Committee of the House of Commons issued a letter to X Corp (formerly Twitter). This letter, dated yesterday, raises concerns about Brand’s use of social media, particularly on X, where he has 11.3 million followers. The committee is already scrutinising broadcasters and production companies that previously employed Brand to examine industry culture and whether it has changed.

The committee’s letter to X Corp queries whether Brand monetises his content on the platform and asks if X intends to suspend his ability to earn money, similar to YouTube. This move is contentious, as the allegations against Brand are not yet proven. The committee’s intervention, asking private companies to suspend monetisation, is a severe step that raises questions about the information driving these decisions.

The letter also references Musk’s response to Brand’s tweet, probing whether Musk has personally influenced any decisions regarding Brand’s status on X. The committee seeks to understand what measures X is taking to ensure creators do not use the platform to undermine the welfare of victims of inappropriate and potentially illegal behaviour.

This direct approach by a government committee to a private company, particularly quoting a tweet, is unprecedented. The origins of Brand’s YouTube channel and its rapid growth are also under scrutiny. The BBC reports that Brand’s channel saw a significant increase in views and followers starting in early 2021, coinciding with a shift in the tone of his videos. His audience grew sharply, from around 100,000 views per video to nearly five million by the end of 2021.

The BBC suggests that Brand’s content, which often involves discussing the “Great Reset” and other controversial topics, has contributed to his channel’s growth. This new fan base, sceptical of mainstream media, has been supportive of Brand. Dr Carol Jasper, a social psychologist, notes that leaders like Brand are often created by their followers, who encourage and motivate them, potentially driven by financial incentives.

While the BBC report does not directly link the growth of Brand’s YouTube channel to the current media investigation, the timing suggests a possible connection. Brand’s narrative against mainstream media and the subsequent reports by these media entities indicate a correlation, though not necessarily causation.

Ultimately, there appears to be more behind the scenes that we do not yet know. It is likely that additional information will emerge over time, providing further clarity on this complex situation. In the meantime, the public is left to speculate and await further developments.

https://teasmith.au/resource/committee-writes-to-x-corp-about-russell-brand/

#BlackBeltBarrister #barrister #freeLegalAdvice #freeLegalGuidance #lawyer

The unfolding saga surrounding Russell Brand is evolving at a remarkable pace, making it challenging to keep up. Brand’s preemptive publication against recent allegations, which he posted before they hit the press, drew a notable response from Elon Musk. Musk commented, “Of course they don’t like competition,” in reply to Brand’s video.

In a direct reaction to Musk’s comment, the Culture, Media, and Sport Committee of the House of Commons issued a letter to X Corp (formerly Twitter). This letter, dated yesterday, raises concerns about Brand’s use of social media, particularly on X, where he has 11.3 million followers. The committee is already scrutinising broadcasters and production companies that previously employed Brand to examine industry culture and whether it has changed.

The committee’s letter to X Corp queries whether Brand monetises his content on the platform and asks if X intends to suspend his ability to earn money, similar to YouTube. This move is contentious, as the allegations against Brand are not yet proven. The committee’s intervention, asking private companies to suspend monetisation, is a severe step that raises questions about the information driving these decisions.

The letter also references Musk’s response to Brand’s tweet, probing whether Musk has personally influenced any decisions regarding Brand’s status on X. The committee seeks to understand what measures X is taking to ensure creators do not use the platform to undermine the welfare of victims of inappropriate and potentially illegal behaviour.

This direct approach by a government committee to a private company, particularly quoting a tweet, is unprecedented. The origins of Brand’s YouTube channel and its rapid growth are also under scrutiny. The BBC reports that Brand’s channel saw a significant increase in views and followers starting in early 2021, coinciding with a shift in the tone of his videos. His audience grew sharply, from around 100,000 views per video to nearly five million by the end of 2021.

The BBC suggests that Brand’s content, which often involves discussing the “Great Reset” and other controversial topics, has contributed to his channel’s growth. This new fan base, sceptical of mainstream media, has been supportive of Brand. Dr Carol Jasper, a social psychologist, notes that leaders like Brand are often created by their followers, who encourage and motivate them, potentially driven by financial incentives.

While the BBC report does not directly link the growth of Brand’s YouTube channel to the current media investigation, the timing suggests a possible connection. Brand’s narrative against mainstream media and the subsequent reports by these media entities indicate a correlation, though not necessarily causation.

Ultimately, there appears to be more behind the scenes that we do not yet know. It is likely that additional information will emerge over time, providing further clarity on this complex situation. In the meantime, the public is left to speculate and await further developments.

https://teasmith.au/resource/committee-writes-to-x-corp-about-russell-brand/

#BlackBeltBarrister #barrister #freeLegalAdvice #freeLegalGuidance #lawyer

https://inv.citw.lgbt/watch?v=HKZVqyS2Yk8

Noise pollution can affect people's #health! What the fuck are you supposed to do?

Fed up with #Noisepollution

#LOUDneighbours #noise
#barrister #noisecomplaint

#NuitBlanche

https://inv.citw.lgbt/watch?v=HKZVqyS2Yk8

Noise pollution can affect people's #health! What the fuck are you supposed to do?

Fed up with #Noisepollution

#LOUDneighbours #noise
#barrister #noisecomplaint

#NuitBlanche

#Burke complaint over court incident
https://www.rte.ie/news/courts/2023/0328/1366730-burke-complaint/
<< it is continously amazing that the #Irish #legal profession takes no action over the actions of the Burkes.

Ammi is a qualified #solicitor, Simeon is a #barrister in training, and Enoch isn't daft - they all know what is acceptable and that they are damaging the reputation of Irish law.

Irish regulators tend to fiercely resist taking action until they are a laughing stock. Well, frankly, we are long past that point.

#Burke complaint over court incident
https://www.rte.ie/news/courts/2023/0328/1366730-burke-complaint/
<< it is continously amazing that the #Irish #legal profession takes no action over the actions of the Burkes.

Ammi is a qualified #solicitor, Simeon is a #barrister in training, and Enoch isn't daft - they all know what is acceptable and that they are damaging the reputation of Irish law.

Irish regulators tend to fiercely resist taking action until they are a laughing stock. Well, frankly, we are long past that point.

Calling all practitioners, lecturers and law graduates

If you able to spare a few hours on the morning of Saturday 11th March to judge some moots as part of the student-run mooting event being held in Cardiff please complete this form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfdZU3gHWcwKUc7a1a1uNWXS6xOl9GK93Ln77ji4cmIWAJ9tA/viewform

Please share

#cardiff #southwales #wales #moot #mooting #law #lawyer #barrister #barristers #solicitor #solicitors

Calling all practitioners, lecturers and law graduates

If you able to spare a few hours on the morning of Saturday 11th March to judge some moots as part of the student-run mooting event being held in Cardiff please complete this form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfdZU3gHWcwKUc7a1a1uNWXS6xOl9GK93Ln77ji4cmIWAJ9tA/viewform

Please share

#cardiff #southwales #wales #moot #mooting #law #lawyer #barrister #barristers #solicitor #solicitors

Calling all legal practitioners in South Wales: Are you able to spare a few hours on the morning of Saturday 11th March to judge some moots as part of the student-run mooting event being held in person at Cardiff University in aid of The National Community Law Project?

If so, it would be great if you could please complete this form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfdZU3gHWcwKUc7a1a1uNWXS6xOl9GK93Ln77ji4cmIWAJ9tA/viewform

Please share

#law #lawyers #solicitors #barristers #solicitor #barrister #wales #southwales #cardiff #swansea

Calling all legal practitioners in South Wales: Are you able to spare a few hours on the morning of Saturday 11th March to judge some moots as part of the student-run mooting event being held in person at Cardiff University in aid of The National Community Law Project?

If so, it would be great if you could please complete this form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfdZU3gHWcwKUc7a1a1uNWXS6xOl9GK93Ln77ji4cmIWAJ9tA/viewform

Please share

#law #lawyers #solicitors #barristers #solicitor #barrister #wales #southwales #cardiff #swansea

So time for a new #introduction then! (Leaving hashtags at the end as I hear it works better for accessiblilty)

Welsh🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 , queer :gay_communism: 🏳️‍🌈:transgenderflag: , cis-man livng in London🎡 . Humanistic/gestalt therapist🧠❤️ . Lecturer in law⚖️ , with research/teaching👨‍🏫 on psychology of law/legal practice👩‍⚖️💭 . Previously family law barrister. Buddhist. :flag_tibet: ☸️

Practices and interests (here come the hastags):

#compassion #psychology #psychotherapy #queer #therapy #activism #activist #activists #collective #community #communities #buddhism #buddhist #counsellor #psychotherapist #law #familylaw #sociolegal #legalresearch #lgbtqia+ #lgbtq+ #therapy #hackney #london #barrister #lawyers #gestalt #grouptherapy #therapycollective #leftist #openborders #socialism #communism #abolitionism #abolition #welsh #ucu #strike

It is lovely to see this little #law community grow on Mastodon. As we get to grips with the fedis and the toots, please do let us know if you think we should be following you! (throwing in some hashtags for good measure) #innsofcourt #innertemple #barrister #lawstudent

It is lovely to see this little #law community grow on Mastodon. As we get to grips with the fedis and the toots, please do let us know if you think we should be following you! (throwing in some hashtags for good measure) #innsofcourt #innertemple #barrister #lawstudent

#introduction seems to be a thing... As do hashtags so here we go: I'm a #law lecturer at #WestminsterUni. Used to be a #barrister in #familylaw. More recently a #counsellor/ #psychotherapist and practice from #hackney #cityfarm as part of a #therapycollective, Holborn & #onlinetherapy. General #therapy & specialist therapy for #lawyers. #sociolegal/ #legalresearch & teaching on the #psychology of #legalpractice. More hastags #buddhism #buddhist #queer #lgbt #therapy #psychology #MentalHealth

#introduction seems to be a thing... As do hashtags so here we go: I'm a #law lecturer at #WestminsterUni. Used to be a #barrister in #familylaw. More recently a #counsellor/ #psychotherapist and practice from #hackney #cityfarm as part of a #therapycollective, Holborn & #onlinetherapy. General #therapy & specialist therapy for #lawyers. #sociolegal/ #legalresearch & teaching on the #psychology of #legalpractice. More hastags #buddhism #buddhist #queer #lgbt #therapy #psychology #MentalHealth