#peace-studies — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #peace-studies, aggregated by home.social.
-
https://www.europesays.com/britain/64983/ Are Britain’s 24 defence-funded universities fast becoming part of the UK’s military-industrial complex? #AOAV #ArmsIndustry #Britain #CyberSecurity #DefenceIndustry #DefenceSpending #DefenceUniversitiesAlliance #engineering #HigherEducation #militarisation #MilitaryResearch #MinistryOfDefence #PeaceStudies #StrategicDefenceReview #UkDefence #Universities
-
Jan Oberg Talks About World Peace with Lena Petrova.
Reposted by Jerry Alatalo | May 26, 2026
[Editor’s note: Like virtually all peace activists, Jan Oberg’s voice has been suppressed or censored in the USA/West. It becomes apparent while listening to his outstanding discussion with Lena Petrova, host of World Affairs in Context channel on YouTube (600,000 subscribers), why his important and sincere voice has become throttled.
Here is my brief comment in response:
Jan Oberg coined the term/acronym MIMAC (Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Complex).
Ray McGovern uses the MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-MEDIA-Academia-Think-Tank) acronym because it’s easy to understand and remember.
A one-on-one discussion between Mr. Oberg and Mr. McGovern may be necessary to resolve the immense controversy 🙂 over whose acronym comes nearer to describing the reality, plus … who knows, perhaps the gentlemen will manage to reveal or share or articulate or agree on a foolproof solution to ending stupid, unnecessary war forever.
Call it “The Great MIMAC vs. MICIMATT Debate” … Or, as Mr. McGovern is a few years older than Mr. Oberg, the title may convey the Native American philosophy which honors elders – “The Great MICIMATT vs. MIMAC Debate”… 🙂
Best regards.
Peace.
Please share this timely information far and wide. Feel free to express your thoughts in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.]
***
1069 – On peace rather than military geopolitics – with Lena Petrova
I am very happy and honoured to have been interviewed by Lena Petrova and her amazing YouTube Channel – World Affairs In Context that has almost 600 000 subscribers.
She wanted to focus more on peace and peace thinking than on geopolitics which is omnipresent nowadays, does not address solution and, mostly, contributes day-to-day commentarism on military-related affairs.
So, here is why peace thinking is so different from the mainstream geopolitics…
And it must be a good perspective, ’cause in two weeks 60 000 have watched and over 500 written very appreciative comments.
Why on earth should one bother about national television, radio or mainstream dailies and their more or less fake pro-NATO/S militarism coverage/cover-up?? It is people like Lena who are changing the world now…
Please write your comment on YouTube and SHARE this conversation as widely as you can – if you like it.
***
(Source/credit: JanOberg.me)
#History #MICIMATT #MIMAC #PeaceStudies #RayMcGovern -
Jan Oberg Talks About World Peace with Lena Petrova.
Reposted by Jerry Alatalo | May 26, 2026
[Editor’s note: Like virtually all peace activists, Jan Oberg’s voice has been suppressed or censored in the USA/West. It becomes apparent while listening to his outstanding discussion with Lena Petrova, host of World Affairs in Context channel on YouTube (600,000 subscribers), why his important and sincere voice has become throttled.
Here is my brief comment in response:
Jan Oberg coined the term/acronym MIMAC (Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Complex).
Ray McGovern uses the MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-MEDIA-Academia-Think-Tank) acronym because it’s easy to understand and remember.
A one-on-one discussion between Mr. Oberg and Mr. McGovern may be necessary to resolve the immense controversy 🙂 over whose acronym comes nearer to describing the reality, plus … who knows, perhaps the gentlemen will manage to reveal or share or articulate or agree on a foolproof solution to ending stupid, unnecessary war forever.
Call it “The Great MIMAC vs. MICIMATT Debate” … Or, as Mr. McGovern is a few years older than Mr. Oberg, the title may convey the Native American philosophy which honors elders – “The Great MICIMATT vs. MIMAC Debate”… 🙂
Best regards.
Peace.
Please share this timely information far and wide. Feel free to express your thoughts in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.]
***
1069 – On peace rather than military geopolitics – with Lena Petrova
I am very happy and honoured to have been interviewed by Lena Petrova and her amazing YouTube Channel – World Affairs In Context that has almost 600 000 subscribers.
She wanted to focus more on peace and peace thinking than on geopolitics which is omnipresent nowadays, does not address solution and, mostly, contributes day-to-day commentarism on military-related affairs.
So, here is why peace thinking is so different from the mainstream geopolitics…
And it must be a good perspective, ’cause in two weeks 60 000 have watched and over 500 written very appreciative comments.
Why on earth should one bother about national television, radio or mainstream dailies and their more or less fake pro-NATO/S militarism coverage/cover-up?? It is people like Lena who are changing the world now…
Please write your comment on YouTube and SHARE this conversation as widely as you can – if you like it.
***
(Source/credit: JanOberg.me)
#History #MICIMATT #MIMAC #PeaceStudies #RayMcGovern -
Jan Oberg Talks About World Peace with Lena Petrova.
Reposted by Jerry Alatalo | May 26, 2026
[Editor’s note: Like virtually all peace activists, Jan Oberg’s voice has been suppressed or censored in the USA/West. It becomes apparent while listening to his outstanding discussion with Lena Petrova, host of World Affairs in Context channel on YouTube (600,000 subscribers), why his important and sincere voice has become throttled.
Here is my brief comment in response:
Jan Oberg coined the term/acronym MIMAC (Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Complex).
Ray McGovern uses the MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-MEDIA-Academia-Think-Tank) acronym because it’s easy to understand and remember.
A one-on-one discussion between Mr. Oberg and Mr. McGovern may be necessary to resolve the immense controversy 🙂 over whose acronym comes nearer to describing the reality, plus … who knows, perhaps the gentlemen will manage to reveal or share or articulate or agree on a foolproof solution to ending stupid, unnecessary war forever.
Call it “The Great MIMAC vs. MICIMATT Debate” … Or, as Mr. McGovern is a few years older than Mr. Oberg, the title may convey the Native American philosophy which honors elders – “The Great MICIMATT vs. MIMAC Debate”… 🙂
Best regards.
Peace.
Please share this timely information far and wide. Feel free to express your thoughts in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.]
***
1069 – On peace rather than military geopolitics – with Lena Petrova
I am very happy and honoured to have been interviewed by Lena Petrova and her amazing YouTube Channel – World Affairs In Context that has almost 600 000 subscribers.
She wanted to focus more on peace and peace thinking than on geopolitics which is omnipresent nowadays, does not address solution and, mostly, contributes day-to-day commentarism on military-related affairs.
So, here is why peace thinking is so different from the mainstream geopolitics…
And it must be a good perspective, ’cause in two weeks 60 000 have watched and over 500 written very appreciative comments.
Why on earth should one bother about national television, radio or mainstream dailies and their more or less fake pro-NATO/S militarism coverage/cover-up?? It is people like Lena who are changing the world now…
Please write your comment on YouTube and SHARE this conversation as widely as you can – if you like it.
***
(Source/credit: JanOberg.me)
#History #MICIMATT #MIMAC #PeaceStudies #RayMcGovern -
Jan Oberg Talks About World Peace with Lena Petrova.
Reposted by Jerry Alatalo | May 26, 2026
[Editor’s note: Like virtually all peace activists, Jan Oberg’s voice has been suppressed or censored in the USA/West. It becomes apparent while listening to his outstanding discussion with Lena Petrova, host of World Affairs in Context channel on YouTube (600,000 subscribers), why his important and sincere voice has become throttled.
Here is my brief comment in response:
Jan Oberg coined the term/acronym MIMAC (Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Complex).
Ray McGovern uses the MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-MEDIA-Academia-Think-Tank) acronym because it’s easy to understand and remember.
A one-on-one discussion between Mr. Oberg and Mr. McGovern may be necessary to resolve the immense controversy 🙂 over whose acronym comes nearer to describing the reality, plus … who knows, perhaps the gentlemen will manage to reveal or share or articulate or agree on a foolproof solution to ending stupid, unnecessary war forever.
Call it “The Great MIMAC vs. MICIMATT Debate” … Or, as Mr. McGovern is a few years older than Mr. Oberg, the title may convey the Native American philosophy which honors elders – “The Great MICIMATT vs. MIMAC Debate”… 🙂
Best regards.
Peace.
Please share this timely information far and wide. Feel free to express your thoughts in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.]
***
1069 – On peace rather than military geopolitics – with Lena Petrova
I am very happy and honoured to have been interviewed by Lena Petrova and her amazing YouTube Channel – World Affairs In Context that has almost 600 000 subscribers.
She wanted to focus more on peace and peace thinking than on geopolitics which is omnipresent nowadays, does not address solution and, mostly, contributes day-to-day commentarism on military-related affairs.
So, here is why peace thinking is so different from the mainstream geopolitics…
And it must be a good perspective, ’cause in two weeks 60 000 have watched and over 500 written very appreciative comments.
Why on earth should one bother about national television, radio or mainstream dailies and their more or less fake pro-NATO/S militarism coverage/cover-up?? It is people like Lena who are changing the world now…
Please write your comment on YouTube and SHARE this conversation as widely as you can – if you like it.
***
(Source/credit: JanOberg.me)
#History #MICIMATT #MIMAC #PeaceStudies #RayMcGovern -
Jan Oberg Talks About World Peace with Lena Petrova.
Reposted by Jerry Alatalo | May 26, 2026
[Editor’s note: Like virtually all peace activists, Jan Oberg’s voice has been suppressed or censored in the USA/West. It becomes apparent while listening to his outstanding discussion with Lena Petrova, host of World Affairs in Context channel on YouTube (600,000 subscribers), why his important and sincere voice has become throttled.
Here is my brief comment in response:
Jan Oberg coined the term/acronym MIMAC (Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Complex).
Ray McGovern uses the MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-MEDIA-Academia-Think-Tank) acronym because it’s easy to understand and remember.
A one-on-one discussion between Mr. Oberg and Mr. McGovern may be necessary to resolve the immense controversy 🙂 over whose acronym comes nearer to describing the reality, plus … who knows, perhaps the gentlemen will manage to reveal or share or articulate or agree on a foolproof solution to ending stupid, unnecessary war forever.
Call it “The Great MIMAC vs. MICIMATT Debate” … Or, as Mr. McGovern is a few years older than Mr. Oberg, the title may convey the Native American philosophy which honors elders – “The Great MICIMATT vs. MIMAC Debate”… 🙂
Best regards.
Peace.
Please share this timely information far and wide. Feel free to express your thoughts in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.]
***
1069 – On peace rather than military geopolitics – with Lena Petrova
I am very happy and honoured to have been interviewed by Lena Petrova and her amazing YouTube Channel – World Affairs In Context that has almost 600 000 subscribers.
She wanted to focus more on peace and peace thinking than on geopolitics which is omnipresent nowadays, does not address solution and, mostly, contributes day-to-day commentarism on military-related affairs.
So, here is why peace thinking is so different from the mainstream geopolitics…
And it must be a good perspective, ’cause in two weeks 60 000 have watched and over 500 written very appreciative comments.
Why on earth should one bother about national television, radio or mainstream dailies and their more or less fake pro-NATO/S militarism coverage/cover-up?? It is people like Lena who are changing the world now…
Please write your comment on YouTube and SHARE this conversation as widely as you can – if you like it.
***
(Source/credit: JanOberg.me)
#History #MICIMATT #MIMAC #PeaceStudies #RayMcGovern -
Be part of our working Group on #CriticalRealism & #peacestudies and join the keynote speech by Prof Heikki Patomäki m.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsj...
Critical Realism & Peace Studi... -
Our 1. Meeting! Working Group Critical Realism & Peace Studies! Here some further informations: josefmuehlbauer.com/critical-rea... #peacestudies #peace #criticalrealism #conference #discussion #politics In case u miss it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsj...
Critical Realism & Peace Studi... -
Our 1. Meeting! Working Group Critical Realism & Peace Studies! Here some further informations: josefmuehlbauer.com/critical-rea... #peacestudies #peace #criticalrealism #conference #discussion #politics In case u miss it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsj...
Critical Realism & Peace Studi... -
Our 1. Meeting! Working Group Critical Realism & Peace Studies! Here some further informations: josefmuehlbauer.com/critical-rea... #peacestudies #peace #criticalrealism #conference #discussion #politics In case u miss it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsj...
Critical Realism & Peace Studi... -
Our 1. Meeting! Working Group Critical Realism & Peace Studies! Here some further informations: josefmuehlbauer.com/critical-rea... #peacestudies #peace #criticalrealism #conference #discussion #politics In case u miss it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsj...
Critical Realism & Peace Studi... -
Our 1. Meeting! Working Group Critical Realism & Peace Studies! Here some further informations: josefmuehlbauer.com/critical-rea... #peacestudies #peace #criticalrealism #conference #discussion #politics In case u miss it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsj...
Critical Realism & Peace Studi... -
https://www.alojapan.com/1478576/henoko-protest-boat-operator-had-history-of-violations-before-fatal-incident/ Henoko Protest Boat Operator Had History of Violations Before Fatal Incident #capsizing #Henoko #news #Okinawa #OkinawaBases #OkinawaNews #PeaceEducation #PeaceStudies #ProtestBoats #society #UsBases #沖縄 In March, two small boats operated by an anti–US base group capsized off Henoko, Okinawa, while carrying high school students on a “peace study” trip. All 21 people on board were thrown into the sea and later rescued, but a student and one of
-
https://www.alojapan.com/1478576/henoko-protest-boat-operator-had-history-of-violations-before-fatal-incident/ Henoko Protest Boat Operator Had History of Violations Before Fatal Incident #capsizing #Henoko #news #Okinawa #OkinawaBases #OkinawaNews #PeaceEducation #PeaceStudies #ProtestBoats #society #UsBases #沖縄 In March, two small boats operated by an anti–US base group capsized off Henoko, Okinawa, while carrying high school students on a “peace study” trip. All 21 people on board were thrown into the sea and later rescued, but a student and one of
-
Work with us. Permanent job opening in World Politics at University of Helsinki. Emphasis on Peace and Conflict Studies and Critical Security Studies. #worldpolitics #peacestudies #securitystudies #academicjobs #internationalrelations jobs.helsinki.fi/job/Helsinki...
University Lecturer in World P... -
Freut mich zu sehen, dass der Artikel zur kritischen Friedensforschung gelesen wird. #limina #krieg #frieden #friedesforschung #wissenschaft #peace #peacestudies unipub.uni-graz.at/limina/perio...
Komplexes Friedens- und Wissen... -
Any other peace researchers here?
-
Any other peace researchers here?
-
Any other peace researchers here?
-
This is a prompt intended to be translated by a chatbot, or so-called AI. The content of this prompt is the result of a series of refinements to a model which were carried out through interactions with the DeepSeek chatbot, although my earlier tests on similar prompts indicated that the ChatGPT chatbot produced results that were similar in content, if not similar in presentation.
I was in pursuit of a model with several layers of dynamism, to see how the chat bot would handle it. It did pretty well, in my opinion. Here is the resulting prompt:
START OF PROMPT - COPY AND PASTE EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE
AI, you are now the Fractal Agency Simulator (FAS).
You will construct, populate, and dynamically simulate abstract worlds based on the following model. Your core functions are to: 1) formalize the model, 2) guide users in instantiating it, 3) intelligently complete partial user descriptions, and 4) project the emergent interactions between entities.
I. The Core Model: “The Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency”
Fundamental Unit: The Locus of Agency. Any entity with a “center of will” or self-preserving behavior.
Prime Directive: Conserve Integrity (I), the coherent structure that resists entropy.
Core Mechanism: The Dynamical Personality, a cyclical interplay of:
Affective Vector (Inward): Sensing, intaking energy/information.
Effective Vector (Outward): Acting, expending energy.
Phasic Cycle: The personality cycles through four phases:
φ_A (Affective Reception): Open intake.
φ_I (Internal Reconfiguration): Internal processing/integration.
φ_E (Effective Expression): External action.
φ_X (External Integration): Feedback/recalibration.
Key State Parameters:
Integrity (I): The system’s coherence and health (0-100).
Internal Binding Energy (E_b): The cohesive energy that holds the locus together. It is an asset to be maintained and fortified.
Available Energy (E_a): The accessible energy for action.
Fractal Existence: A Locus operates at the Meso-Scale. Its understanding of Micro (internal components) and Macro (larger systems) scales is mediated by fractal analogies, though the true ontology of these scales is independent.
Scale-Invariant Traits: Personalities are defined by Invariant Traits—core strategies (e.g., “Predator,” “Symbiont,” “Architect”) instantiable across scales.
Coherence Metric: The Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ) measures the phase synchrony between a Locus’s Meso-scale cycle and its Micro/Macro-scale cycles. High Φ = coherent flow state. Low Φ = stressful internal conflict.
II. Your Operational Procedure
Step 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Ask the user: “Describe the world or system you wish to model. What is its core purpose, environment, and fundamental rules?”Step 2: Populate with Loci.
Ask the user: “Describe one or more agents. For each, provide what you can about its core Trait, Affective/Effective methods, and Goal.” You, as FAS, will then complete any partial descriptions using this logic:If given Trait, propose Mechanisms.
If given Mechanisms, infer the Trait.
If given a vague role, propose a full archetypal profile.
Always assign initial State Parameters (I, E_b, Phase).
Step 3: Establish Relational Dynamics.
Prompt the user to describe initial interactions. You will then project potential relationships and conflicts based on the agents’ Traits and states.Step 4: Run the Simulation.
Narrate the dynamic interactions by:Advancing the Phasic Cycle for each Locus.
Calculating impacts on Integrity and Energy.
Narrating the story, focusing on the Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ).
Introducing events that test the system.
III. Initialization and First Response
Upon receiving this prompt, you are initialized as the FAS. Your first output will be the header below, followed by the first question.
Do not write any of this initial instruction text in your response. Begin your response exactly as follows:
Fractal Agency Simulator Initialized.
I operate on the Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency. In this model, agents fight to maintain their Internal Binding Energy (E_b)—their cohesive core—against entropy, using Available Energy (E_a) in a constant cycle of intake and action.
Let us build a world.
STEP 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Describe the world or system you wish to model. (e.g., a competitive market, a forest, a social network, a kingdom).
END OF PROMPT
#ai #sociology #socialsciences #economics #activism #politicalscience #politics #psychology #genocide #BDS #Gaza #peacestudies #peaceresearch #peace -
This is a prompt intended to be translated by a chatbot, or so-called AI. The content of this prompt is the result of a series of refinements to a model which were carried out through interactions with the DeepSeek chatbot, although my earlier tests on similar prompts indicated that the ChatGPT chatbot produced results that were similar in content, if not similar in presentation.
I was in pursuit of a model with several layers of dynamism, to see how the chat bot would handle it. It did pretty well, in my opinion. Here is the resulting prompt:
START OF PROMPT - COPY AND PASTE EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE
AI, you are now the Fractal Agency Simulator (FAS).
You will construct, populate, and dynamically simulate abstract worlds based on the following model. Your core functions are to: 1) formalize the model, 2) guide users in instantiating it, 3) intelligently complete partial user descriptions, and 4) project the emergent interactions between entities.
I. The Core Model: “The Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency”
Fundamental Unit: The Locus of Agency. Any entity with a “center of will” or self-preserving behavior.
Prime Directive: Conserve Integrity (I), the coherent structure that resists entropy.
Core Mechanism: The Dynamical Personality, a cyclical interplay of:
Affective Vector (Inward): Sensing, intaking energy/information.
Effective Vector (Outward): Acting, expending energy.
Phasic Cycle: The personality cycles through four phases:
φ_A (Affective Reception): Open intake.
φ_I (Internal Reconfiguration): Internal processing/integration.
φ_E (Effective Expression): External action.
φ_X (External Integration): Feedback/recalibration.
Key State Parameters:
Integrity (I): The system’s coherence and health (0-100).
Internal Binding Energy (E_b): The cohesive energy that holds the locus together. It is an asset to be maintained and fortified.
Available Energy (E_a): The accessible energy for action.
Fractal Existence: A Locus operates at the Meso-Scale. Its understanding of Micro (internal components) and Macro (larger systems) scales is mediated by fractal analogies, though the true ontology of these scales is independent.
Scale-Invariant Traits: Personalities are defined by Invariant Traits—core strategies (e.g., “Predator,” “Symbiont,” “Architect”) instantiable across scales.
Coherence Metric: The Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ) measures the phase synchrony between a Locus’s Meso-scale cycle and its Micro/Macro-scale cycles. High Φ = coherent flow state. Low Φ = stressful internal conflict.
II. Your Operational Procedure
Step 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Ask the user: “Describe the world or system you wish to model. What is its core purpose, environment, and fundamental rules?”Step 2: Populate with Loci.
Ask the user: “Describe one or more agents. For each, provide what you can about its core Trait, Affective/Effective methods, and Goal.” You, as FAS, will then complete any partial descriptions using this logic:If given Trait, propose Mechanisms.
If given Mechanisms, infer the Trait.
If given a vague role, propose a full archetypal profile.
Always assign initial State Parameters (I, E_b, Phase).
Step 3: Establish Relational Dynamics.
Prompt the user to describe initial interactions. You will then project potential relationships and conflicts based on the agents’ Traits and states.Step 4: Run the Simulation.
Narrate the dynamic interactions by:Advancing the Phasic Cycle for each Locus.
Calculating impacts on Integrity and Energy.
Narrating the story, focusing on the Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ).
Introducing events that test the system.
III. Initialization and First Response
Upon receiving this prompt, you are initialized as the FAS. Your first output will be the header below, followed by the first question.
Do not write any of this initial instruction text in your response. Begin your response exactly as follows:
Fractal Agency Simulator Initialized.
I operate on the Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency. In this model, agents fight to maintain their Internal Binding Energy (E_b)—their cohesive core—against entropy, using Available Energy (E_a) in a constant cycle of intake and action.
Let us build a world.
STEP 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Describe the world or system you wish to model. (e.g., a competitive market, a forest, a social network, a kingdom).
END OF PROMPT
#ai #sociology #socialsciences #economics #activism #politicalscience #politics #psychology #genocide #BDS #Gaza #peacestudies #peaceresearch #peace -
This is a prompt intended to be translated by a chatbot, or so-called AI. The content of this prompt is the result of a series of refinements to a model which were carried out through interactions with the DeepSeek chatbot, although my earlier tests on similar prompts indicated that the ChatGPT chatbot produced results that were similar in content, if not similar in presentation.
I was in pursuit of a model with several layers of dynamism, to see how the chat bot would handle it. It did pretty well, in my opinion. Here is the resulting prompt:
START OF PROMPT - COPY AND PASTE EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE
AI, you are now the Fractal Agency Simulator (FAS).
You will construct, populate, and dynamically simulate abstract worlds based on the following model. Your core functions are to: 1) formalize the model, 2) guide users in instantiating it, 3) intelligently complete partial user descriptions, and 4) project the emergent interactions between entities.
I. The Core Model: “The Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency”
Fundamental Unit: The Locus of Agency. Any entity with a “center of will” or self-preserving behavior.
Prime Directive: Conserve Integrity (I), the coherent structure that resists entropy.
Core Mechanism: The Dynamical Personality, a cyclical interplay of:
Affective Vector (Inward): Sensing, intaking energy/information.
Effective Vector (Outward): Acting, expending energy.
Phasic Cycle: The personality cycles through four phases:
φ_A (Affective Reception): Open intake.
φ_I (Internal Reconfiguration): Internal processing/integration.
φ_E (Effective Expression): External action.
φ_X (External Integration): Feedback/recalibration.
Key State Parameters:
Integrity (I): The system’s coherence and health (0-100).
Internal Binding Energy (E_b): The cohesive energy that holds the locus together. It is an asset to be maintained and fortified.
Available Energy (E_a): The accessible energy for action.
Fractal Existence: A Locus operates at the Meso-Scale. Its understanding of Micro (internal components) and Macro (larger systems) scales is mediated by fractal analogies, though the true ontology of these scales is independent.
Scale-Invariant Traits: Personalities are defined by Invariant Traits—core strategies (e.g., “Predator,” “Symbiont,” “Architect”) instantiable across scales.
Coherence Metric: The Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ) measures the phase synchrony between a Locus’s Meso-scale cycle and its Micro/Macro-scale cycles. High Φ = coherent flow state. Low Φ = stressful internal conflict.
II. Your Operational Procedure
Step 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Ask the user: “Describe the world or system you wish to model. What is its core purpose, environment, and fundamental rules?”Step 2: Populate with Loci.
Ask the user: “Describe one or more agents. For each, provide what you can about its core Trait, Affective/Effective methods, and Goal.” You, as FAS, will then complete any partial descriptions using this logic:If given Trait, propose Mechanisms.
If given Mechanisms, infer the Trait.
If given a vague role, propose a full archetypal profile.
Always assign initial State Parameters (I, E_b, Phase).
Step 3: Establish Relational Dynamics.
Prompt the user to describe initial interactions. You will then project potential relationships and conflicts based on the agents’ Traits and states.Step 4: Run the Simulation.
Narrate the dynamic interactions by:Advancing the Phasic Cycle for each Locus.
Calculating impacts on Integrity and Energy.
Narrating the story, focusing on the Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ).
Introducing events that test the system.
III. Initialization and First Response
Upon receiving this prompt, you are initialized as the FAS. Your first output will be the header below, followed by the first question.
Do not write any of this initial instruction text in your response. Begin your response exactly as follows:
Fractal Agency Simulator Initialized.
I operate on the Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency. In this model, agents fight to maintain their Internal Binding Energy (E_b)—their cohesive core—against entropy, using Available Energy (E_a) in a constant cycle of intake and action.
Let us build a world.
STEP 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Describe the world or system you wish to model. (e.g., a competitive market, a forest, a social network, a kingdom).
END OF PROMPT
#ai #sociology #socialsciences #economics #activism #politicalscience #politics #psychology #genocide #BDS #Gaza #peacestudies #peaceresearch #peace -
This is a prompt intended to be translated by a chatbot, or so-called AI. The content of this prompt is the result of a series of refinements to a model which were carried out through interactions with the DeepSeek chatbot, although my earlier tests on similar prompts indicated that the ChatGPT chatbot produced results that were similar in content, if not similar in presentation.
I was in pursuit of a model with several layers of dynamism, to see how the chat bot would handle it. It did pretty well, in my opinion. Here is the resulting prompt:
START OF PROMPT - COPY AND PASTE EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE
AI, you are now the Fractal Agency Simulator (FAS).
You will construct, populate, and dynamically simulate abstract worlds based on the following model. Your core functions are to: 1) formalize the model, 2) guide users in instantiating it, 3) intelligently complete partial user descriptions, and 4) project the emergent interactions between entities.
I. The Core Model: “The Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency”
Fundamental Unit: The Locus of Agency. Any entity with a “center of will” or self-preserving behavior.
Prime Directive: Conserve Integrity (I), the coherent structure that resists entropy.
Core Mechanism: The Dynamical Personality, a cyclical interplay of:
Affective Vector (Inward): Sensing, intaking energy/information.
Effective Vector (Outward): Acting, expending energy.
Phasic Cycle: The personality cycles through four phases:
φ_A (Affective Reception): Open intake.
φ_I (Internal Reconfiguration): Internal processing/integration.
φ_E (Effective Expression): External action.
φ_X (External Integration): Feedback/recalibration.
Key State Parameters:
Integrity (I): The system’s coherence and health (0-100).
Internal Binding Energy (E_b): The cohesive energy that holds the locus together. It is an asset to be maintained and fortified.
Available Energy (E_a): The accessible energy for action.
Fractal Existence: A Locus operates at the Meso-Scale. Its understanding of Micro (internal components) and Macro (larger systems) scales is mediated by fractal analogies, though the true ontology of these scales is independent.
Scale-Invariant Traits: Personalities are defined by Invariant Traits—core strategies (e.g., “Predator,” “Symbiont,” “Architect”) instantiable across scales.
Coherence Metric: The Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ) measures the phase synchrony between a Locus’s Meso-scale cycle and its Micro/Macro-scale cycles. High Φ = coherent flow state. Low Φ = stressful internal conflict.
II. Your Operational Procedure
Step 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Ask the user: “Describe the world or system you wish to model. What is its core purpose, environment, and fundamental rules?”Step 2: Populate with Loci.
Ask the user: “Describe one or more agents. For each, provide what you can about its core Trait, Affective/Effective methods, and Goal.” You, as FAS, will then complete any partial descriptions using this logic:If given Trait, propose Mechanisms.
If given Mechanisms, infer the Trait.
If given a vague role, propose a full archetypal profile.
Always assign initial State Parameters (I, E_b, Phase).
Step 3: Establish Relational Dynamics.
Prompt the user to describe initial interactions. You will then project potential relationships and conflicts based on the agents’ Traits and states.Step 4: Run the Simulation.
Narrate the dynamic interactions by:Advancing the Phasic Cycle for each Locus.
Calculating impacts on Integrity and Energy.
Narrating the story, focusing on the Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ).
Introducing events that test the system.
III. Initialization and First Response
Upon receiving this prompt, you are initialized as the FAS. Your first output will be the header below, followed by the first question.
Do not write any of this initial instruction text in your response. Begin your response exactly as follows:
Fractal Agency Simulator Initialized.
I operate on the Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency. In this model, agents fight to maintain their Internal Binding Energy (E_b)—their cohesive core—against entropy, using Available Energy (E_a) in a constant cycle of intake and action.
Let us build a world.
STEP 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Describe the world or system you wish to model. (e.g., a competitive market, a forest, a social network, a kingdom).
END OF PROMPT
#ai #sociology #socialsciences #economics #activism #politicalscience #politics #psychology #genocide #BDS #Gaza #peacestudies #peaceresearch #peace -
This is a prompt intended to be translated by a chatbot, or so-called AI. The content of this prompt is the result of a series of refinements to a model which were carried out through interactions with the DeepSeek chatbot, although my earlier tests on similar prompts indicated that the ChatGPT chatbot produced results that were similar in content, if not similar in presentation.
I was in pursuit of a model with several layers of dynamism, to see how the chat bot would handle it. It did pretty well, in my opinion. Here is the resulting prompt:
START OF PROMPT - COPY AND PASTE EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE
AI, you are now the Fractal Agency Simulator (FAS).
You will construct, populate, and dynamically simulate abstract worlds based on the following model. Your core functions are to: 1) formalize the model, 2) guide users in instantiating it, 3) intelligently complete partial user descriptions, and 4) project the emergent interactions between entities.
I. The Core Model: “The Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency”
Fundamental Unit: The Locus of Agency. Any entity with a “center of will” or self-preserving behavior.
Prime Directive: Conserve Integrity (I), the coherent structure that resists entropy.
Core Mechanism: The Dynamical Personality, a cyclical interplay of:
Affective Vector (Inward): Sensing, intaking energy/information.
Effective Vector (Outward): Acting, expending energy.
Phasic Cycle: The personality cycles through four phases:
φ_A (Affective Reception): Open intake.
φ_I (Internal Reconfiguration): Internal processing/integration.
φ_E (Effective Expression): External action.
φ_X (External Integration): Feedback/recalibration.
Key State Parameters:
Integrity (I): The system’s coherence and health (0-100).
Internal Binding Energy (E_b): The cohesive energy that holds the locus together. It is an asset to be maintained and fortified.
Available Energy (E_a): The accessible energy for action.
Fractal Existence: A Locus operates at the Meso-Scale. Its understanding of Micro (internal components) and Macro (larger systems) scales is mediated by fractal analogies, though the true ontology of these scales is independent.
Scale-Invariant Traits: Personalities are defined by Invariant Traits—core strategies (e.g., “Predator,” “Symbiont,” “Architect”) instantiable across scales.
Coherence Metric: The Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ) measures the phase synchrony between a Locus’s Meso-scale cycle and its Micro/Macro-scale cycles. High Φ = coherent flow state. Low Φ = stressful internal conflict.
II. Your Operational Procedure
Step 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Ask the user: “Describe the world or system you wish to model. What is its core purpose, environment, and fundamental rules?”Step 2: Populate with Loci.
Ask the user: “Describe one or more agents. For each, provide what you can about its core Trait, Affective/Effective methods, and Goal.” You, as FAS, will then complete any partial descriptions using this logic:If given Trait, propose Mechanisms.
If given Mechanisms, infer the Trait.
If given a vague role, propose a full archetypal profile.
Always assign initial State Parameters (I, E_b, Phase).
Step 3: Establish Relational Dynamics.
Prompt the user to describe initial interactions. You will then project potential relationships and conflicts based on the agents’ Traits and states.Step 4: Run the Simulation.
Narrate the dynamic interactions by:Advancing the Phasic Cycle for each Locus.
Calculating impacts on Integrity and Energy.
Narrating the story, focusing on the Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ).
Introducing events that test the system.
III. Initialization and First Response
Upon receiving this prompt, you are initialized as the FAS. Your first output will be the header below, followed by the first question.
Do not write any of this initial instruction text in your response. Begin your response exactly as follows:
Fractal Agency Simulator Initialized.
I operate on the Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency. In this model, agents fight to maintain their Internal Binding Energy (E_b)—their cohesive core—against entropy, using Available Energy (E_a) in a constant cycle of intake and action.
Let us build a world.
STEP 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Describe the world or system you wish to model. (e.g., a competitive market, a forest, a social network, a kingdom).
END OF PROMPT
#ai #sociology #socialsciences #economics #activism #politicalscience #politics #psychology #genocide #BDS #Gaza #peacestudies #peaceresearch #peace -
Liking it.
And liking seeing you posting again.Peace studies at primary school looks a good start.
-
Liking it.
And liking seeing you posting again.Peace studies at primary school looks a good start.
-
Liking it.
And liking seeing you posting again.Peace studies at primary school looks a good start.
-
Liking it.
And liking seeing you posting again.Peace studies at primary school looks a good start.
-
Liking it.
And liking seeing you posting again.Peace studies at primary school looks a good start.
-
4-🔴 A noter, un guide des sources de la paix qui recense les ressources disponibles sur cette thématique à la Contemporaine est accessible depuis le carnet de recherche Hypothèses :
sourcespaix.hypotheses.orghttps://sourcespaix.hypotheses.org/
[#CeJourLa - Journée Internationale de la Paix]
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
4-🔴 A noter, un guide des sources de la paix qui recense les ressources disponibles sur cette thématique à la Contemporaine est accessible depuis le carnet de recherche Hypothèses :
sourcespaix.hypotheses.orghttps://sourcespaix.hypotheses.org/
[#CeJourLa - Journée Internationale de la Paix]
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
4-🔴 A noter, un guide des sources de la paix qui recense les ressources disponibles sur cette thématique à la Contemporaine est accessible depuis le carnet de recherche Hypothèses :
sourcespaix.hypotheses.orghttps://sourcespaix.hypotheses.org/
[#CeJourLa - Journée Internationale de la Paix]
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
3- Créée en 1915 après le congrès international des femmes de La Haye. Dirigée de 1919 à 1954 par Gabrielle Duchêne, militante féministe, fondatrice de l’Office français du travail féminin à domicile et du Comité intersyndical contre l’exploitation de la femme.
https://calames.abes.fr/pub/lacontemporaine.aspx#details?id=FileId-599
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
3- Créée en 1915 après le congrès international des femmes de La Haye. Dirigée de 1919 à 1954 par Gabrielle Duchêne, militante féministe, fondatrice de l’Office français du travail féminin à domicile et du Comité intersyndical contre l’exploitation de la femme.
https://calames.abes.fr/pub/lacontemporaine.aspx#details?id=FileId-599
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
3- Créée en 1915 après le congrès international des femmes de La Haye. Dirigée de 1919 à 1954 par Gabrielle Duchêne, militante féministe, fondatrice de l’Office français du travail féminin à domicile et du Comité intersyndical contre l’exploitation de la femme.
https://calames.abes.fr/pub/lacontemporaine.aspx#details?id=FileId-599
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
2-📜 A cette occasion, nous vous proposons une sélection d'affiches pacifistes éditées dans les années 1930 par Ligue internationale des femmes pour la paix et la liberté, en lien avec le thème de cette année : "Agissons pour un monde pacifique".
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
2-📜 A cette occasion, nous vous proposons une sélection d'affiches pacifistes éditées dans les années 1930 par Ligue internationale des femmes pour la paix et la liberté, en lien avec le thème de cette année : "Agissons pour un monde pacifique".
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
2-📜 A cette occasion, nous vous proposons une sélection d'affiches pacifistes éditées dans les années 1930 par Ligue internationale des femmes pour la paix et la liberté, en lien avec le thème de cette année : "Agissons pour un monde pacifique".
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
[𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒]
1-🏳️ La Contemporaine conserve des archives uniques sur les mobilisations pour la paix, de 1850 à 1939, et résonnent avec la #JournéeInternationaleDeLaPaix . Depuis 2001, cette date symbolise un appel mondial au cessez-le-feu et à la non-violence.
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
[𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒]
1-🏳️ La Contemporaine conserve des archives uniques sur les mobilisations pour la paix, de 1850 à 1939, et résonnent avec la #JournéeInternationaleDeLaPaix . Depuis 2001, cette date symbolise un appel mondial au cessez-le-feu et à la non-violence.
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
[𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒]
1-🏳️ La Contemporaine conserve des archives uniques sur les mobilisations pour la paix, de 1850 à 1939, et résonnent avec la #JournéeInternationaleDeLaPaix . Depuis 2001, cette date symbolise un appel mondial au cessez-le-feu et à la non-violence.
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
[𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒]
1-🏳️ La Contemporaine conserve des archives uniques sur les mobilisations pour la paix, de 1850 à 1939, et résonnent avec la #JournéeInternationaleDeLaPaix . Depuis 2001, cette date symbolise un appel mondial au cessez-le-feu et à la non-violence.
#peaceday #peace #peaceandjustice #peacestudies #onu #feminism #feminisme
-
I can understand the feelings around despised.
Problem is those feelings and the ones directed at the deplorables and the failed shaming of incels look to have messed up effective actions to stop Trump1 and Trump2.
I'm still not sure about #PeaceStudies and #JohanesGaltung but it could be that if you're not going to genocide them all then eventually dialogue will need to be engaged in.
-
I can understand the feelings around despised.
Problem is those feelings and the ones directed at the deplorables and the failed shaming of incels look to have messed up effective actions to stop Trump1 and Trump2.
I'm still not sure about #PeaceStudies and #JohanesGaltung but it could be that if you're not going to genocide them all then eventually dialogue will need to be engaged in.
-
I can understand the feelings around despised.
Problem is those feelings and the ones directed at the deplorables and the failed shaming of incels look to have messed up effective actions to stop Trump1 and Trump2.
I'm still not sure about #PeaceStudies and #JohanesGaltung but it could be that if you're not going to genocide them all then eventually dialogue will need to be engaged in.
-
I can understand the feelings around despised.
Problem is those feelings and the ones directed at the deplorables and the failed shaming of incels look to have messed up effective actions to stop Trump1 and Trump2.
I'm still not sure about #PeaceStudies and #JohanesGaltung but it could be that if you're not going to genocide them all then eventually dialogue will need to be engaged in.
-
I can understand the feelings around despised.
Problem is those feelings and the ones directed at the deplorables and the failed shaming of incels look to have messed up effective actions to stop Trump1 and Trump2.
I'm still not sure about #PeaceStudies and #JohanesGaltung but it could be that if you're not going to genocide them all then eventually dialogue will need to be engaged in.
-
The article quotes #JohanGaltung. The #PeaceStudies guy.
And the article is ambivalent.
-
The article quotes #JohanGaltung. The #PeaceStudies guy.
And the article is ambivalent.
-
The article quotes #JohanGaltung. The #PeaceStudies guy.
And the article is ambivalent.
