home.social

#intuitions — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #intuitions, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. @amcewen Yes, if the glue is water-based (avoiding much VoC and pals) I suppose it almost has to be. For me, 16kg is 16/25ths of a bag of coal. %-P

    #intuitions #metrics #qualia

  2. @amcewen Yes, if the glue is water-based (avoiding much VoC and pals) I suppose it almost has to be. For me, 16kg is 16/25ths of a bag of coal. %-P

    #intuitions #metrics #qualia

  3. @amcewen Yes, if the glue is water-based (avoiding much VoC and pals) I suppose it almost has to be. For me, 16kg is 16/25ths of a bag of coal. %-P

    #intuitions #metrics #qualia

  4. @amcewen Yes, if the glue is water-based (avoiding much VoC and pals) I suppose it almost has to be. For me, 16kg is 16/25ths of a bag of coal. %-P

    #intuitions #metrics #qualia

  5. @amcewen Yes, if the glue is water-based (avoiding much VoC and pals) I suppose it almost has to be. For me, 16kg is 16/25ths of a bag of coal. %-P

    #intuitions #metrics #qualia

  6. If you want to get better at reading between the lines, #observe the #space. You know those #intuitions you've had, you can have them constantly. You can. #God is not stingy. Let's get back to the freaking experts that aren't experts. Infinity matters more than #entire #practice of physics & math.

  7. If you want to get better at reading between the lines, #observe the #space. You know those #intuitions you've had, you can have them constantly. You can. #God is not stingy. Let's get back to the freaking experts that aren't experts. Infinity matters more than #entire #practice of physics & math.

  8. [2/3] It's not showing how remote viewing can explain #UFOs. It's not showing remote viewing at all, so far.

    Post #Newton, #science & #philosophical thought require #math & other #technologies that extend our #human senses & capabilities — #radioastronomy for example. These methods reach beyond our #biases, #intuitions & other limitations.

    The show asks us to be #skeptical of official agendas, but then clouds its own #agenda. It knows a few things, but does it reveal hard #truths about #UFOs?

  9. [2/3] It's not showing how remote viewing can explain #UFOs. It's not showing remote viewing at all, so far.

    Post #Newton, #science & #philosophical thought require #math & other #technologies that extend our #human senses & capabilities — #radioastronomy for example. These methods reach beyond our #biases, #intuitions & other limitations.

    The show asks us to be #skeptical of official agendas, but then clouds its own #agenda. It knows a few things, but does it reveal hard #truths about #UFOs?

  10. [2/3] It's not showing how remote viewing can explain #UFOs. It's not showing remote viewing at all, so far.

    Post #Newton, #science & #philosophical thought require #math & other #technologies that extend our #human senses & capabilities — #radioastronomy for example. These methods reach beyond our #biases, #intuitions & other limitations.

    The show asks us to be #skeptical of official agendas, but then clouds its own #agenda. It knows a few things, but does it reveal hard #truths about #UFOs?

  11. [2/3] It's not showing how remote viewing can explain #UFOs. It's not showing remote viewing at all, so far.

    Post #Newton, #science & #philosophical thought require #math & other #technologies that extend our #human senses & capabilities — #radioastronomy for example. These methods reach beyond our #biases, #intuitions & other limitations.

    The show asks us to be #skeptical of official agendas, but then clouds its own #agenda. It knows a few things, but does it reveal hard #truths about #UFOs?

  12. [2/3] It's not showing how remote viewing can explain #UFOs. It's not showing remote viewing at all, so far.

    Post #Newton, #science & #philosophical thought require #math & other #technologies that extend our #human senses & capabilities — #radioastronomy for example. These methods reach beyond our #biases, #intuitions & other limitations.

    The show asks us to be #skeptical of official agendas, but then clouds its own #agenda. It knows a few things, but does it reveal hard #truths about #UFOs?

  13. We're now moving into the first part of Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics with this Sadler's Lectures podcast episode looking at what he means by a priori intuitions and what they have to do with mathematics

    soundcloud.com/gregorybsadler/
    #Podcast #Kant #Intuitions #Philosophy #Metaphysics #Mathematics

  14. We're now moving into the first part of Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics with this Sadler's Lectures podcast episode looking at what he means by a priori intuitions and what they have to do with mathematics

    soundcloud.com/gregorybsadler/
    #Podcast #Kant #Intuitions #Philosophy #Metaphysics #Mathematics

  15. We're now moving into the first part of Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics with this Sadler's Lectures podcast episode looking at what he means by a priori intuitions and what they have to do with mathematics

    soundcloud.com/gregorybsadler/
    #Podcast #Kant #Intuitions #Philosophy #Metaphysics #Mathematics

  16. We're now moving into the first part of Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics with this Sadler's Lectures podcast episode looking at what he means by a priori intuitions and what they have to do with mathematics

    soundcloud.com/gregorybsadler/
    #Podcast #Kant #Intuitions #Philosophy #Metaphysics #Mathematics

  17. We're now moving into the first part of Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics with this Sadler's Lectures podcast episode looking at what he means by a priori intuitions and what they have to do with mathematics

    soundcloud.com/gregorybsadler/
    #Podcast #Kant #Intuitions #Philosophy #Metaphysics #Mathematics

  18. Machine Explanations and Human Understanding

    Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan

    Action editor: Stefan Lee.

    openreview.net/forum?id=y4CGF1

    #intuitions #explanations #intuition

  19. Machine Explanations and Human Understanding

    Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan

    Action editor: Stefan Lee.

    openreview.net/forum?id=y4CGF1

    #intuitions #explanations #intuition

  20. Machine Explanations and Human Understanding

    Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan

    Action editor: Stefan Lee.

    openreview.net/forum?id=y4CGF1

    #intuitions #explanations #intuition

  21. Machine Explanations and Human Understanding

    Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan

    Action editor: Stefan Lee.

    openreview.net/forum?id=y4CGF1

    #intuitions #explanations #intuition

  22. Machine Explanations and Human Understanding

    Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan

    Action editor: Stefan Lee.

    openreview.net/forum?id=y4CGF1

    #intuitions #explanations #intuition

  23. There's a #debate in #ExperimentalPhilosophy (#xPhi) about whether #intuitions about philosophical thought experiments are "stable" (vs. manipulable).

    Some (e.g., @xphilosophy) seem convinced of stability—e.g., because some replications of instability results and new experiments find #pValues > 0.05.

    Alexander & Weinberg express a different view (philpapers.org/rec/ALEPMP). I agree that the debate needs parties to agree on a smallest effect size of interest.

    Page images attached.

  24. There's a #debate in #ExperimentalPhilosophy (#xPhi) about whether #intuitions about philosophical thought experiments are "stable" (vs. manipulable).

    Some (e.g., @xphilosophy) seem convinced of stability—e.g., because some replications of instability results and new experiments find #pValues > 0.05.

    Alexander & Weinberg express a different view (philpapers.org/rec/ALEPMP). I agree that the debate needs parties to agree on a smallest effect size of interest.

    Page images attached.

  25. There's a #debate in #ExperimentalPhilosophy (#xPhi) about whether #intuitions about philosophical thought experiments are "stable" (vs. manipulable).

    Some (e.g., @xphilosophy) seem convinced of stability—e.g., because some replications of instability results and new experiments find #pValues > 0.05.

    Alexander & Weinberg express a different view (philpapers.org/rec/ALEPMP). I agree that the debate needs parties to agree on a smallest effect size of interest.

    Page images attached.

  26. There's a #debate in #ExperimentalPhilosophy (#xPhi) about whether #intuitions about philosophical thought experiments are "stable" (vs. manipulable).

    Some (e.g., @xphilosophy) seem convinced of stability—e.g., because some replications of instability results and new experiments find #pValues > 0.05.

    Alexander & Weinberg express a different view (philpapers.org/rec/ALEPMP). I agree that the debate needs parties to agree on a smallest effect size of interest.

    Page images attached.

  27. There's a #debate in #ExperimentalPhilosophy (#xPhi) about whether #intuitions about philosophical thought experiments are "stable" (vs. manipulable).

    Some (e.g., @xphilosophy) seem convinced of stability—e.g., because some replications of instability results and new experiments find #pValues > 0.05.

    Alexander & Weinberg express a different view (philpapers.org/rec/ALEPMP). I agree that the debate needs parties to agree on a smallest effect size of interest.

    Page images attached.