home.social

#hostilesexism — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #hostilesexism, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. DATE: October 19, 2026 at 11:24AM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: Mothers and Fathers May Pass Along Different Kinds of Sexism to Their Kids

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: PsyPost

    Psychologists often divide sexism into two categories: hostile sexism, which involves openly negative feelings toward women, and benevolent sexism, which involves idealizing women and believing that they require men's protection. Now, a new study has found that fathers' hostile sexism and mothers' benevolent sexism are most consistently linked to their children's views, hinting that mothers and fathers may play different roles in passing along...

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #HostileSexism #BenevolentSexism #GenderRoles #ParentalInfluence #MotherEffects #FatherEffects #SexismTransmission #ChildDevelopment #SocialPsychology #PsyPost

  2. DATE: October 17, 2026 at 06:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Mothers and fathers may pass along different kinds of sexism to their kids, new research suggests

    URL: psypost.org/mothers-and-father

    A new study published in Sex Roles suggests that 8-year-old children’s views about women tend to mirror their parents’ sexist attitudes. Fathers’ hostile sexism and mothers’ benevolent sexism were most consistently linked to their children’s views, hinting that mothers and fathers may play different roles in passing these beliefs along.

    Psychologists often divide sexism into two distinct categories: hostile and benevolent. Hostile sexism involves openly negative feelings toward women, particularly those who are perceived as challenging male power. Benevolent sexism is more subtle, as it involves idealizing women who conform to traditional gender roles and believing that they are delicate and require men’s protection.

    Research suggests that benevolent sexism, despite its polite surface, can reinforce an unequal division of household labor and limit women’s career ambitions. Parents appear to be one source of children’s ideas about gender: a 2002 meta-analysis found that parents with more traditional views about gender tended to have children with more traditional views.

    Studies of whether parents pass on hostile and benevolent sexism specifically have mostly involved teenagers. A 2012 study, for example, found that mothers who endorsed more benevolent sexism tended to have teenage daughters who did too. Some theorists had argued that benevolent sexism only emerges in adolescence, but a 2020 study co-authored by Hammond, which introduced the stuffed-toy task used in the new research, found that children as young as 5 already agree with both hostile and benevolent ideas about women.

    Parental sexism may also show up in everyday interactions: research covered by PsyPost in 2023, led by Overall, found that mothers and fathers higher in hostile sexism were less responsive toward their young children during family interactions.

    To build on this line of inquiry, researchers Oksana S. Voznyuk, a PhD candidate at the University of Auckland, Nickola C. Overall, a professor at the University of Auckland, and Matt Hammond, an associate professor at Victoria University of Wellington, set out to test the direct intergenerational links between parents and children. They wanted to see if mothers’ and fathers’ specific sexist attitudes predict their children’s agreement with similar statements.

    “In the big picture, we wanted to investigate why gender gaps persist worldwide, even as generations of women and men have been fighting for gender equality,” Voznyuk, Overall, and Hammond told PsyPost. “We thought that an overlooked process that may contribute to this slow progress toward gender equality could be the transmission of sexist beliefs intergenerationally from parents to their children.”

    The research team collected data from 175 family groups, each consisting of a mother, a father, and their 8-year-old child. The families lived in New Zealand and were part of a larger study that began when the children were 4 or 5. The children were fairly evenly split by gender, with 51 percent being girls and 49 percent being boys. Parents filled out standard questionnaires designed to measure their levels of hostile and benevolent sexism.

    To assess the children’s attitudes, the researchers used a specially designed laboratory activity that young kids could easily understand. An experimenter introduced each child to a stuffed toy named Feppy, explaining that the toy was a visitor from far away. Feppy then made a series of statements about men and women.

    Some of the toy’s statements reflected hostile sexism, such as saying that women get upset easily over jokes. Other statements reflected benevolent sexism, such as claiming that men need to protect women from danger. The children were asked to indicate whether Feppy was “sort of” or “really” right or wrong about each statement. On average, children rated Feppy’s hostile statements as sort of wrong and its benevolent statements as sort of right, and boys and girls gave similar answers.

    When the researchers analyzed the responses, they found distinct patterns connecting the parents’ views to their children’s views. Because both parents’ attitudes were analyzed together, each link held even after accounting for the other parent’s views. Fathers who expressed higher levels of hostile sexism tended to have children who also agreed more strongly with hostile gender attitudes. This link was present regardless of whether the child was a boy or a girl.

    A different pattern emerged for benevolent sexism. Mothers who endorsed benevolent sexist beliefs were more likely to have children who agreed with benevolent gender attitudes. Just like the link between fathers’ and children’s hostile views, this connection applied to both sons and daughters. Fathers’ benevolent sexism, by contrast, was not linked to their children’s benevolent attitudes.

    The researchers also found that a mother’s hostile sexism was linked to her child’s views, but only for sons. The authors note the reason is unclear, but one possibility is that mothers higher in hostile sexism parent boys differently, for example by being more controlling with sons.

    “The big takeaway from our findings is that children learn from the attitudes, behaviors, and everyday conversations they see at home, and the messages we send about expectations for women and men, or girls and boys, likely have a lasting impact,” the researchers noted. “This matters because those beliefs can shape everything from career opportunities to romantic relationships later in life.”

    “One surprising outcome was that mothers and fathers may play unique roles in passing along sexist beliefs,” the researchers explained. “These differences may be about the roles that fathers and mothers play. Fathers who agree with hostile sexism believe that they should be the authority in the family, and they may use more controlling parenting behavior and express hostile sexism by behaving aggressively toward mothers. These behaviors can show children that men should have power and authority and therefore socialize children’s hostile gender beliefs.”

    The authors suggest that mothers who endorse benevolent sexism might actively teach these values to their children, as these beliefs often appear socially acceptable or positive on the surface. “Mothers who agree with benevolent sexism may be more likely to hold traditional homemaker and caregiver roles,” the team added. “This may give them more opportunity to model and teach children ideas about protecting and valuing women who fit traditional expectations of what good girls and good women should be like.”

    To ensure these links were not driven by other factors, the researchers adjusted their statistical models for the parents’ education levels, employment status, perceived socioeconomic status, and whether the mother or father was the primary caregiver. They also controlled for the children’s age and their “theory of mind,” which is the psychological term for a person’s ability to understand that other people have their own separate thoughts and feelings. Even with these adjustments, the connections between the parents’ and children’s sexist attitudes remained, and incidentally, parents’ hostile sexism was linked to lower theory-of-mind scores in children.

    “The most important note is that this research is not about blaming parents, but about recognizing that we all play a role in transmitting and reinforcing gender beliefs,” the researchers emphasized. “Small changes may make an important difference. Many of us have internalized sexist attitudes to some extent, and often we don’t even know what they are, their impact, or how we display them. This research is a good reminder that the little things we say and do can shape how children think about women and men.”

    As with all research, there are some caveats to consider. The links were modest: the correlation between fathers’ and children’s hostile attitudes, for example, was about 0.29, on a scale where 1 would mean a perfect match.

    “As with most research about beliefs and attitudes, the effect size of parents’ sexist beliefs on children’s beliefs is relatively small,” the researchers pointed out. “Children are likely to have many experiences that contribute to their beliefs about women and men, but as children’s first and often most long-term role models, parents are likely to be particularly impactful influences in children’s development of sexist attitudes and an important intervention point.”

    The study relies on observational data, meaning it cannot establish a direct cause and effect. There is also a possibility that children influence their parents’ views over time as they express their own ideas about gender. Additionally, the stuffed-toy task was developed with U.S. children, and one hostile item had to be dropped for poor fit with this New Zealand sample. All of the families were mother-father couples in New Zealand, so the patterns may differ in other family types and cultures.

    Future research will need to explore these dynamics in single-parent households, families with LGBTQ+ parents, and across different cultural contexts.

    “We believe two main directions are important for the next steps in this research,” the researchers said. “The first is to investigate whether children’s gender attitudes are related to negative outcomes for children’s wellbeing and their social, emotional and educational development.”

    They suspect these attitudes could affect how children see themselves, how they do in school, and how they get along with peers. “The second is to investigate how parents are passing down their beliefs are parents modeling traditional gender roles at home, treating sons and daughters differently, or shaping how children dress and behave in a way that communicates these gender beliefs?” they added.

    The authors argue that because children’s early beliefs about gender may shape their later interests, schooling, and relationships, efforts to reduce gender stereotypes in childhood will likely need to engage parents as well as children.

    The study, “Intergenerational Links Between Parents’ and Children’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism,” was authored by Oksana S. Voznyuk, Nickola C. Overall, Matthew D. Hammond, Rachel S. T. Low, Annette M. E. Henderson, Valerie T. Chang, and Myfanwy Christensen.

    URL: psypost.org/mothers-and-father

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #IntergenerationalSexism #ParentingAndBias #HostileSexism #BenevolentSexism #GenderStereotypes #KidsAndGender #ParentalInfluence #SexismResearch #GenderEquality #FamilyDynamics

  3. DATE: September 24, 2026 at 04:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Plant-based meat labels make food seem less masculine, study finds

    URL: psypost.org/plant-based-meat-l

    A new study indicates that simply labeling a dish as a plant-based meat alternative makes meat-eaters view it as less masculine, leading to more negative evaluations. This resistance to plant-based options tends to be strongest among people who hold hostile sexist beliefs. The findings were published in Social Psychological and Personality Science.

    Animal farming places a heavy burden on the environment and raises broad ethical and public health concerns. Plant-based meat alternatives, which are foods made from textured plant protein designed to imitate the taste, appearance, and texture of real meat, offer a way to reduce this impact. But many meat-eaters remain highly resistant to these alternatives. The divide is heavily gendered. For example, a 2024 study covered by PsyPost found that vegetarianism has grown steadily among women over a 15-year period, while rates among men have barely budged.

    Researchers suspect this resistance is tied to the cultural symbolism of food. A 2012 study demonstrated that people across multiple cultures subconsciously associate meat with maleness and masculinity. Because meat is symbolically linked to strength and power, cutting it out of a diet can feel like a loss of status. Building on this idea, a 2023 paper conceptualized giving up meat as a direct threat to a man’s sense of manhood, which triggers psychological resistance.

    More recently, scientists have noticed that these dietary choices are linked to broader beliefs about social dominance. A 2020 study provided empirical evidence that hostile sexist attitudes are strongly tied to the belief that humans should dominate animals and the natural world. Hostile sexism involves negative evaluations of women and femininity, along with the belief that women are inferior to men.

    “There is now quite a lot of evidence that meat is culturally associated with masculinity, and that vegetarians and vegans (particularly vegan men) can be perceived as less masculine,” Kristof Dhont, a reader in psychology at the University of Kent and director of the SHARK Lab, told PsyPost.

    “We wanted to find out whether these associations also have implications for perceptions and evaluations of plant-based meat alternatives themselves, even when they closely resemble conventional meat,” Dhont said. “In this sense, the symbolic meaning attached to ‘plant-based’ food could be a barrier to its acceptance.”

    The research, led by Alina Salmen alongside Dhont, aimed to see if merely labeling a dish as plant-based alters how people perceive its masculinity and appeal. They also wanted to test whether hostile sexism would amplify these effects, making people who endorse male dominance the most likely to reject feminine-coded alternatives.

    To test this, the researchers conducted two experiments. In the first experiment, they recruited 216 university students in the United Kingdom who eat meat. Participants viewed nine images of food, such as burgers, meatballs, and tacos. The images were exactly the same for everyone, but the text labels accompanying them were randomly rotated.

    A third of the participants saw a specific dish labeled as “regular meat,” another third saw it labeled as “plant-based meat,” and the final third saw it labeled as “cultured meat.” Cultured meat is real animal tissue grown in a lab from cell cultures, eliminating the need for animal slaughter. Participants rated each dish’s appeal, expected smell, expected taste, and their likelihood of eating it on a 7-point scale. They also rated the perceived masculinity of each dish on a scale ranging from extremely feminine to extremely masculine, and they completed a questionnaire measuring their endorsement of hostile sexism.

    Even though the food images were identical, dishes labeled as plant-based were rated as less masculine than dishes labeled as regular meat. The plant-based label also led to worse evaluations in terms of expected taste, smell, and overall appeal. Cultured meat was also evaluated more negatively than regular meat.

    When the researchers looked closer, they found that lower masculinity ratings were linked to these negative evaluations, but only for participants who scored higher in hostile sexism. Those with lower levels of sexism did not evaluate the food worse just because they perceived it as less masculine.

    In the second experiment, the research team recruited a larger sample of 1,182 adults in the United States, evenly split between men and women, all of whom were meat-eaters. Participants viewed six identical food images, with the labels rotated between “regular meat” and “plant-based meat.” They rated the same qualities as in the first experiment, but the researchers also added a measure of “food distancing.” Participants indicated how much they agreed with statements like, “I would not want to be seen eating this dish in public.”

    The second experiment replicated the findings of the first. On a 7-point scale, the average overall evaluation dropped from 5.64 for regular meat to 4.74 for plant-based meat. The perceived masculinity dropped from an average of 4.40 to 3.96. The participants also indicated a stronger desire to distance themselves from the dishes labeled as plant-based.

    The researchers identified a psychological chain reaction in the data. The plant-based label led people to view the dish as less masculine, which prompted a desire to distance themselves from the food. This urge to avoid being associated with the dish then predicted a worse overall evaluation.

    Hostile sexism played a powerful role in this chain reaction. People with higher levels of hostile sexism were especially likely to distance themselves from dishes they viewed as lacking masculinity, driving their negative evaluations.

    “It is perhaps worth highlighting that the effects of the plant-based label were clearly observed not only among men but also among women,” Dhont noted. Both men and women in the study showed this pattern, suggesting that hostile sexism shapes food choices across genders.

    “The size of these shifts clearly differs between people,” Dhont explained. “For the overall evaluations the effect was roughly twice the size among those higher in sexism compared with those lower in sexism. The gap between people higher and lower in sexism was even larger when it came to how strongly the label affected perceived masculinity and self-distancing.”

    The findings align with research covered by PsyPost in 2023, which found that men who identify as more masculine consume more meat and are highly resistant to adopting plant-based diets. It is worth noting, however, that the 2023 study measured men’s personal masculine identities, whereas the new study focused on the perceived masculinity of the food itself and the observer’s sexist beliefs.

    “One key takeaway is that our evaluations of food are not determined only by the food itself,” Dhont said. “The societal stigma surrounding plant-based diets and veganism, including the perceived lack of masculine value, can negatively affect evaluations of plant-based meat alternatives.”

    As with all research, there are some caveats to consider. First, the researchers measured perceived masculinity rather than actively manipulating it in a controlled way. This means they cannot say for sure that the loss of masculine symbolism directly caused the negative evaluations. Masculinity and femininity were also measured on a single continuous scale. It is possible that food can hold both masculine and feminine associations at the same time, which future studies might try to measure separately.

    There are a few things to keep in mind regarding the participants’ past experiences. Some people might have had prior bad experiences eating actual plant-based meats, which could have influenced their ratings of the images.

    “These were judgments of images rather than actual purchasing or eating behavior, so the size of the effect in real-world food choices remains an important question for future research,” Dhont said.

    “It would be interesting to see how such findings play out when people actually taste the food or in actual consumption and purchasing behavior,” he added. “For example, we could let people taste plant-based products while experimentally varying how they are labeled, or observe behavioral choices and purchases when people select items from a menu or buffet.”

    To successfully promote plant-based diets, marketing strategies might need to account for these psychological barriers. The authors suggest that framing meat alternatives in ways that appeal to modern, flexible ideals of masculinity might help overcome the stigma associated with vegan and vegetarian options.

    “Another big question is how we can change the symbolism surrounding meat versus plant-based products, and in turn people’s perceptions and reactions to them,” Dhont said. “What strategies can increase openness to plant-based alternatives without simply reinforcing traditional gender stereotypes?”

    The study, “Masculinity Perceptions and Hostile Sexism Shape Evaluations of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives,” was authored by Alina Salmen, Nadira S. Faber, Victoria C. Krings, and Kristof Dhont.

    URL: psypost.org/plant-based-meat-l

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #PlantBasedMeat #MasculinityInFood #PlantBasedLunch #MeatlessMonday #SustainableEating #HostileSexism #FoodMarketing #VeganMeat #EnvironmentallyFriendly #FoodPsychology

  4. Y en una noticia que no sorprende a nadie, la principal actitud detrás del apego al movimiento de #Tradwife en hombres es el sexismo hostil y la religiosidad.¿ Quién lo hubiera dicho, quién lo habría sospechado?… #NoPodíaSaberse

    #Gender #GenderRoles #Sexism #HostileSexism #Religiosity

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843261433199
  5. #FYI #mansplaining #men #hostilesexism #sexism #women #climatedenial #disinformation #climatechange

    "...high level of hostile sexism. Nearly half of these respondents reported they knew as much as or more than climate scientists about climate change."

    Original article (paywalled, login to your local university library to read)

    Benegal and Holman 13 August 2025, Climatic Change 178, 153

    Hostile sexism and overconfidence shape the public’s views of climate change.

    doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-040

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.