#codecad — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #codecad, aggregated by home.social.
-
Another quicky, this is a parametric cable comb generator, built in #replicad.
I like building more elaborate parametric projects, but it's great to have a convenient tool to knock out these easy ones as well.
https://www.printables.com/model/951121-parametric-cable-comb-generator
-
Another quicky, this is a parametric cable comb generator, built in #replicad.
I like building more elaborate parametric projects, but it's great to have a convenient tool to knock out these easy ones as well.
https://www.printables.com/model/951121-parametric-cable-comb-generator
-
Another quicky, this is a parametric cable comb generator, built in #replicad.
I like building more elaborate parametric projects, but it's great to have a convenient tool to knock out these easy ones as well.
https://www.printables.com/model/951121-parametric-cable-comb-generator
-
Another quicky, this is a parametric cable comb generator, built in #replicad.
I like building more elaborate parametric projects, but it's great to have a convenient tool to knock out these easy ones as well.
https://www.printables.com/model/951121-parametric-cable-comb-generator
-
I needed a small tray for my bathroom - it took me a few minutes to model, but now it will take me even less time.
-
I needed a small tray for my bathroom - it took me a few minutes to model, but now it will take me even less time.
-
I needed a small tray for my bathroom - it took me a few minutes to model, but now it will take me even less time.
-
I needed a small tray for my bathroom - it took me a few minutes to model, but now it will take me even less time.
-
I needed a small tray for my bathroom - it took me a few minutes to model, but now it will take me even less time.
-
There is some really cool new features being worked on in #SolveSpace, bringing it a tad closer to #codeCAD like :openscad: #OpenSCAD: named parameters and equation constraints. This will make gearing logic and several other things feasible.
https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/1382#issuecomment-2052520765
-
There is some really cool new features being worked on in #SolveSpace, bringing it a tad closer to #codeCAD like :openscad: #OpenSCAD: named parameters and equation constraints. This will make gearing logic and several other things feasible.
https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/1382#issuecomment-2052520765
-
There is some really cool new features being worked on in #SolveSpace, bringing it a tad closer to #codeCAD like :openscad: #OpenSCAD: named parameters and equation constraints. This will make gearing logic and several other things feasible.
https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/1382#issuecomment-2052520765
-
There is some really cool new features being worked on in #SolveSpace, bringing it a tad closer to #codeCAD like :openscad: #OpenSCAD: named parameters and equation constraints. This will make gearing logic and several other things feasible.
https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/1382#issuecomment-2052520765
-
There is some really cool new features being worked on in #SolveSpace, bringing it a tad closer to #codeCAD like :openscad: #OpenSCAD: named parameters and equation constraints. This will make gearing logic and several other things feasible.
https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/1382#issuecomment-2052520765
-
@scruss Does #FreeCAD not have keybindings for the common constraints? #SolveSpace does at least and it makes sketching quite fast. But I'm totally with you that #codeCAD is so much quicker and more concise for many things.
-
@scruss Does #FreeCAD not have keybindings for the common constraints? #SolveSpace does at least and it makes sketching quite fast. But I'm totally with you that #codeCAD is so much quicker and more concise for many things.
-
@scruss Does #FreeCAD not have keybindings for the common constraints? #SolveSpace does at least and it makes sketching quite fast. But I'm totally with you that #codeCAD is so much quicker and more concise for many things.
-
@scruss Does #FreeCAD not have keybindings for the common constraints? #SolveSpace does at least and it makes sketching quite fast. But I'm totally with you that #codeCAD is so much quicker and more concise for many things.
-
@scruss Does #FreeCAD not have keybindings for the common constraints? #SolveSpace does at least and it makes sketching quite fast. But I'm totally with you that #codeCAD is so much quicker and more concise for many things.
-
Oh and there is a CAD program called Antimony that looks an awful lot like #codeCAD but with graphical interaction:
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/antimony/3/
🧵 A short thread of me looking at #AntimonyCAD and comparing it to #sdfCAD 👇
-
Oh and there is a CAD program called Antimony that looks an awful lot like #codeCAD but with graphical interaction:
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/antimony/3/
🧵 A short thread of me looking at #AntimonyCAD and comparing it to #sdfCAD 👇
-
Oh and there is a CAD program called Antimony that looks an awful lot like #codeCAD but with graphical interaction:
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/antimony/3/
🧵 A short thread of me looking at #AntimonyCAD and comparing it to #sdfCAD 👇
-
Oh and there is a CAD program called Antimony that looks an awful lot like #codeCAD but with graphical interaction:
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/antimony/3/
🧵 A short thread of me looking at #AntimonyCAD and comparing it to #sdfCAD 👇
-
Oh and there is a CAD program called Antimony that looks an awful lot like #codeCAD but with graphical interaction:
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/antimony/3/
🧵 A short thread of me looking at #AntimonyCAD and comparing it to #sdfCAD 👇
-
TIL that there's #ImplicitCAD, a sort of #OpenSCAD dialect that's based on #SDF's, written in #Haskell. It's similar to #sdfCAD in many ways and has the sdf approach's smoothing powers, but also the same shitty meshes as sdfCAD 😅
-
TIL that there's #ImplicitCAD, a sort of #OpenSCAD dialect that's based on #SDF's, written in #Haskell. It's similar to #sdfCAD in many ways and has the sdf approach's smoothing powers, but also the same shitty meshes as sdfCAD 😅
-
TIL that there's #ImplicitCAD, a sort of #OpenSCAD dialect that's based on #SDF's, written in #Haskell. It's similar to #sdfCAD in many ways and has the sdf approach's smoothing powers, but also the same shitty meshes as sdfCAD 😅
-
TIL that there's #ImplicitCAD, a sort of #OpenSCAD dialect that's based on #SDF's, written in #Haskell. It's similar to #sdfCAD in many ways and has the sdf approach's smoothing powers, but also the same shitty meshes as sdfCAD 😅
-
TIL that there's #ImplicitCAD, a sort of #OpenSCAD dialect that's based on #SDF's, written in #Haskell. It's similar to #sdfCAD in many ways and has the sdf approach's smoothing powers, but also the same shitty meshes as sdfCAD 😅
-
Oh for christ's sake what is #pyvista doing here? Randomly moving the axis origins around when switching between rendering modes? How is one supposed to do #CAD like this? 🙄
I'm using pyvista to view the generated #sdfCAD models but shifting axes around is a pretty severe no-go for a 3D viewer. pyvista also recently started spitting out some weird vue2/vue3 errors... Are there any other good #STL viewers for #Jupyter?
-
Oh for christ's sake what is #pyvista doing here? Randomly moving the axis origins around when switching between rendering modes? How is one supposed to do #CAD like this? 🙄
I'm using pyvista to view the generated #sdfCAD models but shifting axes around is a pretty severe no-go for a 3D viewer. pyvista also recently started spitting out some weird vue2/vue3 errors... Are there any other good #STL viewers for #Jupyter?
-
Oh for christ's sake what is #pyvista doing here? Randomly moving the axis origins around when switching between rendering modes? How is one supposed to do #CAD like this? 🙄
I'm using pyvista to view the generated #sdfCAD models but shifting axes around is a pretty severe no-go for a 3D viewer. pyvista also recently started spitting out some weird vue2/vue3 errors... Are there any other good #STL viewers for #Jupyter?
-
Oh for christ's sake what is #pyvista doing here? Randomly moving the axis origins around when switching between rendering modes? How is one supposed to do #CAD like this? 🙄
I'm using pyvista to view the generated #sdfCAD models but shifting axes around is a pretty severe no-go for a 3D viewer. pyvista also recently started spitting out some weird vue2/vue3 errors... Are there any other good #STL viewers for #Jupyter?
-
Oh for christ's sake what is #pyvista doing here? Randomly moving the axis origins around when switching between rendering modes? How is one supposed to do #CAD like this? 🙄
I'm using pyvista to view the generated #sdfCAD models but shifting axes around is a pretty severe no-go for a 3D viewer. pyvista also recently started spitting out some weird vue2/vue3 errors... Are there any other good #STL viewers for #Jupyter?
-
@brett Right. I really want to like #SolveSpace. There aren't many FOSS CAD programs and SolveSpace's simple yet powerful approach fits a good niche between #codeCAD and e.g. #FreeCAD. However very basic operations like intersecting round objects seem to quickly cause problems and require triangulation or not work at all. Threads are also a big problem. I'll keep using it. FreeCAD is a bit too big for my taste.
-
@brett Right. I really want to like #SolveSpace. There aren't many FOSS CAD programs and SolveSpace's simple yet powerful approach fits a good niche between #codeCAD and e.g. #FreeCAD. However very basic operations like intersecting round objects seem to quickly cause problems and require triangulation or not work at all. Threads are also a big problem. I'll keep using it. FreeCAD is a bit too big for my taste.
-
@brett Right. I really want to like #SolveSpace. There aren't many FOSS CAD programs and SolveSpace's simple yet powerful approach fits a good niche between #codeCAD and e.g. #FreeCAD. However very basic operations like intersecting round objects seem to quickly cause problems and require triangulation or not work at all. Threads are also a big problem. I'll keep using it. FreeCAD is a bit too big for my taste.
-
@brett Right. I really want to like #SolveSpace. There aren't many FOSS CAD programs and SolveSpace's simple yet powerful approach fits a good niche between #codeCAD and e.g. #FreeCAD. However very basic operations like intersecting round objects seem to quickly cause problems and require triangulation or not work at all. Threads are also a big problem. I'll keep using it. FreeCAD is a bit too big for my taste.
-
@brett Right. I really want to like #SolveSpace. There aren't many FOSS CAD programs and SolveSpace's simple yet powerful approach fits a good niche between #codeCAD and e.g. #FreeCAD. However very basic operations like intersecting round objects seem to quickly cause problems and require triangulation or not work at all. Threads are also a big problem. I'll keep using it. FreeCAD is a bit too big for my taste.
-
I tried approaching a small #3dDesign project first with graphical #SolveSpace, but quickly got annoyed by all the clicky-draggy bits and complicated constraints and switched to #sdfCAD. I love its new auto-chamfering capabilities, making the design of such a clamping ring with #3dPrinting in mind a bliss in eight lines of #Python code - including boilerplate.
-
I tried approaching a small #3dDesign project first with graphical #SolveSpace, but quickly got annoyed by all the clicky-draggy bits and complicated constraints and switched to #sdfCAD. I love its new auto-chamfering capabilities, making the design of such a clamping ring with #3dPrinting in mind a bliss in eight lines of #Python code - including boilerplate.
-
I tried approaching a small #3dDesign project first with graphical #SolveSpace, but quickly got annoyed by all the clicky-draggy bits and complicated constraints and switched to #sdfCAD. I love its new auto-chamfering capabilities, making the design of such a clamping ring with #3dPrinting in mind a bliss in eight lines of #Python code - including boilerplate.
-
I tried approaching a small #3dDesign project first with graphical #SolveSpace, but quickly got annoyed by all the clicky-draggy bits and complicated constraints and switched to #sdfCAD. I love its new auto-chamfering capabilities, making the design of such a clamping ring with #3dPrinting in mind a bliss in eight lines of #Python code - including boilerplate.
-
I tried approaching a small #3dDesign project first with graphical #SolveSpace, but quickly got annoyed by all the clicky-draggy bits and complicated constraints and switched to #sdfCAD. I love its new auto-chamfering capabilities, making the design of such a clamping ring with #3dPrinting in mind a bliss in eight lines of #Python code - including boilerplate.
-
#sdfCAD now supports chamfers and fillets (and both simultaneously!) for unions, intersections and differences 🥳
-
#sdfCAD now supports chamfers and fillets (and both simultaneously!) for unions, intersections and differences 🥳