home.social

#pvsnp — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #pvsnp, aggregated by home.social.

  1. New post: P vs NP through a boundary dynamics lens.

    Not a proof — a reframing.

    What if complexity isn’t about computation, but about reachability?

    • Solutions can exist
    • Be recognisable
    • Yet remain inaccessible

    We introduce Boundary Resistance — the structural “friction” that limits traversal.

    Applies across maths, physics, biology, and systems.

    🐾 Some doors exist. Not all have handles.

    open.substack.com/pub/hybridmi

    #Mathematics #Complexity #PvsNP #SystemsThinking #HybridMind42 #BoundaryDynamics

  2. 🐢🔍 Ah, another *riveting* tale of P vs NP, now with 33% more buzzwords and an extra sprinkling of 'categorical frameworks.' 🤯🎉 Because nothing says "I cracked the code" like a paper no one can pronounce! 🏆📚
    arxiv.org/abs/2510.17829 #PvsNP #CategoricalFrameworks #BuzzwordBonanza #ResearchInnovation #MathMystery #HackerNews #ngated

  3. Hmmm... I'm no expert on #PvsNP by any means, but this looks both #AI-generated and a bit fishy to me. 🤨

    A Homological Proof of P≠NP: Computational Topology via Categorical Framework arxiv.org/abs/2510.17829 #paper📄 #compsci

    N.B. #GitHub page with #Lean4 code returns 404.

  4. 🤡 Ah, those perennial optimists at #arXiv are at it again, claiming they've cracked the infamous P≠NP with a "homological proof" via "computational topology." 🙄 Sure, because nothing says cutting-edge computer science like a good old-fashioned topology party! 🎉 Meanwhile, arXiv continues its relentless quest for #donations, because solving millennium problems is expensive, folks! 😂
    arxiv.org/abs/2510.17829 #PvsNP #computationaltopology #optimism #computerScience #HackerNews #ngated

  5. # —if a solution is easy to check, is it easy to find?

    > thoughts on P vs NP

    —why might a solution be easier to check than to find?

    For solvable problems, consider the idea that "the solution (to our problem) already exists, before we have found it"

    I think it can be useful to think of an undiscovered solution as "existing already", within a special kind of "problem-relative abstract space" — just as physical-objects exist within a physical-place — and just as with physical-places, an "abstract problem-space" can also be explored to search-for and find whatever is contained within

    - like physical-places, some abstract problem-spaces are small and uncluttered — which makes the task of finding whatever solution is contained within easier

    - like physical-places, some abstract problem-spaces are large, and overflow with all manner of miscellaneous bric-a-brac and junk (and at times, might seem to be full of everything-other than the thing we want to find...) — which makes finding solutions harder

    For some challenging problems, the thing we search for (our as-yet undiscovered solution) might be broken up into fragments — only found by a more extensive search throughout the entire problem-space:-

    1. sometimes like a jigsaw puzzle, whereby each fragment is recognisable in its own right;

    2. and on other occasions, sought-for fragments might be individually unrecognisable — until that-is some critical-mass, sufficient for recognisable form to be composed, is found.

    On those occasions (having found sufficient fragments to compose the recognisable form, of our of now-discovered solution), the task of re-discovering the same solution within the same problem-space is made easier, because we now know what we are looking for, and we recognise it (our solution, and fragments-thereof) more easily.

    In this way, we might notice that solutions to problems are often easier to "rediscover" than to "discover" — because, when we know more about "what-it-is-we-are-looking-for", (whether in whole or in part), we spend less time inspecting "all-that-we-aren't"

    > intuitively then, we might say that "exploration costs less, when examination costs less"

    —but is this all there is to P vs NP?

    1/n

    #pnp #pvsnp

  6. @aragubas Get ready for a computer science info dump.

    What @crumbcake described in his last reply is the halting problem, which is undecidable. In other words, it's impossible for a computer (as we currently define them) to answer that problem for every possible input. Computerphile did a 6 minute video explaining the halting problem and why it's undecidable if you'd like to know more.

    The question of P vs NP is, informally stated, this: If it's easy to check an answer to a problem, is it also easy to find an answer? An example of such a problem is sudoku. It's pretty easy to look over a completed grid for correctness but it seems much harder to find a solution to an incomplete grid. But is it harder under the more rigorous computer science definitions of computational complexity? We actually don't know, and there's a million dollar prize if you can prove it one way or the other.

    If you'd like to learn a little more, I'd highly recommend this 11 minute long video about the computational complexity zoo for a relatively approachable introduction to all these concepts. Enjoy. 💙

    #ComputerScience #PvsNP #HaltingProblem #ComputationalComplexity

  7. @aragubas Get ready for a computer science info dump.

    What @crumbcake described in his last reply is the halting problem, which is undecidable. In other words, it's impossible for a computer (as we currently define them) to answer that problem for every possible input. Computerphile did a 6 minute video explaining the halting problem and why it's undecidable if you'd like to know more.

    The question of P vs NP is, informally stated, this: If it's easy to check an answer to a problem, is it also easy to find an answer? An example of such a problem is sudoku. It's pretty easy to look over a completed grid for correctness but it seems much harder to find a solution to an incomplete grid. But is it harder under the more rigorous computer science definitions of computational complexity? We actually don't know, and there's a million dollar prize if you can prove it one way or the other.

    If you'd like to learn a little more, I'd highly recommend this 11 minute long video about the computational complexity zoo for a relatively approachable introduction to all these concepts. Enjoy. 💙

    #ComputerScience #PvsNP #HaltingProblem #ComputationalComplexity

  8. @aragubas Get ready for a computer science info dump.

    What @crumbcake described in his last reply is the halting problem, which is undecidable. In other words, it's impossible for a computer (as we currently define them) to answer that problem for every possible input. Computerphile did a 6 minute video explaining the halting problem and why it's undecidable if you'd like to know more.

    The question of P vs NP is, informally stated, this: If it's easy to check an answer to a problem, is it also easy to find an answer? An example of such a problem is sudoku. It's pretty easy to look over a completed grid for correctness but it seems much harder to find a solution to an incomplete grid. But is it harder under the more rigorous computer science definitions of computational complexity? We actually don't know, and there's a million dollar prize if you can prove it one way or the other.

    If you'd like to learn a little more, I'd highly recommend this 11 minute long video about the computational complexity zoo for a relatively approachable introduction to all these concepts. Enjoy. 💙

    #ComputerScience #PvsNP #HaltingProblem #ComputationalComplexity

  9. New Hacking the Grepson podcast episode is out!

    Hacking the Grepson 048: P vs NP

    Buckle up, everyone: we're tackling a weighty subject that's plagued tech for decades, and it ain't just peanuts.

    Episode Link: podbean.com/eas/pb-9cadu-14866
    Show Feed: feed.podbean.com/hackingthegre
    Show Home: hackingthegrepson.com

    #HackingTheGrepson #podcast #programming #development #pvsnp #complexity #onotation