home.social

#naga — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #naga, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Rongmei Encyclopedia @rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com@rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com ·

    The Legal Evolution of Indigenous Identity: Recognition of the Rongmei Tribe in Nagaland


    Introduction

    The socio-political landscape of Northeast India is frequently defined by the intersection of ancestral heritage and administrative classification. On May 9, 2024, a significant milestone was reached when the Nagaland government approved the issuance of Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates to 1,313 members of the Rongmei tribe who are permanently settled within the state.1 This decision addresses a long-standing grievance regarding the “indigenous” status of the Rongmei people in Nagaland, a community that also holds deep ancestral roots in Manipur and Assam. Understanding this development requires an analysis of the Zeliangrong identity and the rigorous criteria for “indigenous” recognition in the region.

    I. The Zeliangrong Heritage and the Rongmei Identity

    The Rongmei people are an integral branch of the Zeliangrong collective, a socio-cultural and political union comprising the Zeme, Liangmai, and Rongmei sub-tribes.2 Historically, these groups have shared a common ancestry and geographic continuity across the contiguous hill tracts of Manipur, Nagaland, and Assam.

    International standards, as defined by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), characterize indigenous peoples by their historical continuity, language, and ancestral occupation of lands prior to modern state formation.3 In the context of Nagaland, the Zeliang and Rongmei identities have been closely intertwined; however, the formal recognition of the Rongmei as a separate ST entity within Nagaland has faced unique hurdles compared to their status in Manipur, where they are recognized as a core indigenous group.4

    II. The Criteria for Indigenous Inhabitants in Nagaland

    The government’s recent approval is not a blanket recognition but is strictly bound by the “1963 Cut-off Date.” Under the Nagaland Land and Revenue Regulations, an “Indigenous Inhabitant” is defined as a person who settled in the state prior to December 1, 1963 (the date of Nagaland’s statehood).5

    This legal threshold is essential for several reasons:

    • Protection of Rights: Recognition grants access to reservation in government jobs and education, as well as the right to own land in protected areas.6
    • Genealogical Verification: The 1,313 approved individuals and their direct descendants were identified through a rigorous verification process conducted by the state-appointed Committee on Rongmei Indigenous Inhabitant of Nagaland.7

    III. Regional Comparisons: Manipur and the Yek Salai System

    The meaning of “Indigenous” for the Rongmei takes on a different legal dimension in neighboring Manipur. There, indigenous status is often validated through the “Yek Salai” system—a traditional clan classification system dating back to 33 CE.8 While Nagaland relies on a modern administrative cut-off (1963), Manipur’s traditionalists, such as the Federation of Haomee, argue for a definition based on “First Settler” status and ancestral village records.9

    In Manipur, the Rongmei, along with the Zeme and Liangmai (historically grouped as Kacha Nagas), are listed as Scheduled Tribes with a population of over 62,000 as of the 2001 Census.10 The disparity in population and recognition between the states has often led to identity fluctuations for Rongmei families living near the borders.

    IV. Neighbouring Tribes and the Scheduled Tribe List

    The Nagaland government’s decision must be viewed within the broader framework of the Scheduled Tribe list, which includes diverse Naga and non-Naga groups:

    1. Naga Tribes: Angami, Ao, Chakhesang, Chang, Konyak, Lotha, Phom, Pochury, Rengma, Sangtam, Sumi, Yimkhiung, Khiamniungan, and Zeliang (Zeme and Liangmai).11
    2. Neighboring Groups: The Kuki tribe, which shares borders with Zeliangrong areas, is also recognized, though historical standing orders from the British era sometimes distinguished between original settlers and later migrants.12

    Conclusion

    The approval of ST certificates for the Rongmei in Nagaland signifies a reconciliation between historical presence and legal documentation. By acknowledging those settled since 1963, the state recognizes the Rongmei as a legitimate component of its indigenous fabric while maintaining the integrity of its statehood-based eligibility criteria. This move reinforces the Zeliangrong bond and ensures that the Rongmei’s historical ties to the land are translated into contemporary socio-economic protections.

    Footnotes

    1 “Nagaland Govt Approves ST Certificates for Rongmei Tribe Members Settled in State,” The Sentinel Assam, May 10, 2024.

    2 M. T. Laiba, Geography of Manipur, (Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996), 503.

    3 Fifteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), Report on Indigenous Issues, May 2016.

    4 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Art. 33, 2007.

    5 Government of Nagaland, Notification on Indigenous Inhabitant Status, No. Home/Sectt-1/8/94.

    6 Supreme Court of India, Kailas & Others v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, January 5, 2011.

    7 “State Cabinet Approves ST Status for 1313 Rongmeis,” Nagaland Post, May 9, 2024.

    8 Federation of Haomee (FOH), Resolution on Indigenous Communities and the Yek Salai System, 2019.

    9 O. Kumar Singh, Archaeological Finds in Manipur Caves, (Imphal: Anthropological Survey, 1983).

    10 Census of India 2001, Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur.

    11 Government of India, The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (as amended).

    12 T. A. Sharp, Standing Order of the President of the Manipur State Darbar, July 23, 1941.

    Bibliography

    Census of India 2001. Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

    Government of India. The Constitution of India. Articles 342 and 366(25).

    Jamir, Senayangba Chubatoshi. “Indigenous Identity in Nagaland.” Keynote address at the Nagaland Indigenous People’s Forum, Dimapur, October 27, 2019.

    Laiba, M. T. Geography of Manipur. Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996.

    Manipur State Darbar. Standing Orders of the President (PMSD). Order No. 2 of 1941.

    Singh, O. Kumar. Prehistoric Archaeology of Manipur. Imphal: State Museum Publications, 1983.

    United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Resolution 61/295. New York: UN, 2007.

    United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Report of the Fifteenth Session. New York: UN, 2016.

    Online Source Links (Plain Format)

    #History #India #Naga #News #NewsNorthEast #politics #RongmeiNaga #Zeliangrong
  2. Rongmei Encyclopedia @rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com@rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com ·

    The Legal Evolution of Indigenous Identity: Recognition of the Rongmei Tribe in Nagaland


    Introduction

    The socio-political landscape of Northeast India is frequently defined by the intersection of ancestral heritage and administrative classification. On May 9, 2024, a significant milestone was reached when the Nagaland government approved the issuance of Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates to 1,313 members of the Rongmei tribe who are permanently settled within the state.1 This decision addresses a long-standing grievance regarding the “indigenous” status of the Rongmei people in Nagaland, a community that also holds deep ancestral roots in Manipur and Assam. Understanding this development requires an analysis of the Zeliangrong identity and the rigorous criteria for “indigenous” recognition in the region.

    I. The Zeliangrong Heritage and the Rongmei Identity

    The Rongmei people are an integral branch of the Zeliangrong collective, a socio-cultural and political union comprising the Zeme, Liangmai, and Rongmei sub-tribes.2 Historically, these groups have shared a common ancestry and geographic continuity across the contiguous hill tracts of Manipur, Nagaland, and Assam.

    International standards, as defined by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), characterize indigenous peoples by their historical continuity, language, and ancestral occupation of lands prior to modern state formation.3 In the context of Nagaland, the Zeliang and Rongmei identities have been closely intertwined; however, the formal recognition of the Rongmei as a separate ST entity within Nagaland has faced unique hurdles compared to their status in Manipur, where they are recognized as a core indigenous group.4

    II. The Criteria for Indigenous Inhabitants in Nagaland

    The government’s recent approval is not a blanket recognition but is strictly bound by the “1963 Cut-off Date.” Under the Nagaland Land and Revenue Regulations, an “Indigenous Inhabitant” is defined as a person who settled in the state prior to December 1, 1963 (the date of Nagaland’s statehood).5

    This legal threshold is essential for several reasons:

    • Protection of Rights: Recognition grants access to reservation in government jobs and education, as well as the right to own land in protected areas.6
    • Genealogical Verification: The 1,313 approved individuals and their direct descendants were identified through a rigorous verification process conducted by the state-appointed Committee on Rongmei Indigenous Inhabitant of Nagaland.7

    III. Regional Comparisons: Manipur and the Yek Salai System

    The meaning of “Indigenous” for the Rongmei takes on a different legal dimension in neighboring Manipur. There, indigenous status is often validated through the “Yek Salai” system—a traditional clan classification system dating back to 33 CE.8 While Nagaland relies on a modern administrative cut-off (1963), Manipur’s traditionalists, such as the Federation of Haomee, argue for a definition based on “First Settler” status and ancestral village records.9

    In Manipur, the Rongmei, along with the Zeme and Liangmai (historically grouped as Kacha Nagas), are listed as Scheduled Tribes with a population of over 62,000 as of the 2001 Census.10 The disparity in population and recognition between the states has often led to identity fluctuations for Rongmei families living near the borders.

    IV. Neighbouring Tribes and the Scheduled Tribe List

    The Nagaland government’s decision must be viewed within the broader framework of the Scheduled Tribe list, which includes diverse Naga and non-Naga groups:

    1. Naga Tribes: Angami, Ao, Chakhesang, Chang, Konyak, Lotha, Phom, Pochury, Rengma, Sangtam, Sumi, Yimkhiung, Khiamniungan, and Zeliang (Zeme and Liangmai).11
    2. Neighboring Groups: The Kuki tribe, which shares borders with Zeliangrong areas, is also recognized, though historical standing orders from the British era sometimes distinguished between original settlers and later migrants.12

    Conclusion

    The approval of ST certificates for the Rongmei in Nagaland signifies a reconciliation between historical presence and legal documentation. By acknowledging those settled since 1963, the state recognizes the Rongmei as a legitimate component of its indigenous fabric while maintaining the integrity of its statehood-based eligibility criteria. This move reinforces the Zeliangrong bond and ensures that the Rongmei’s historical ties to the land are translated into contemporary socio-economic protections.

    Footnotes

    1 “Nagaland Govt Approves ST Certificates for Rongmei Tribe Members Settled in State,” The Sentinel Assam, May 10, 2024.

    2 M. T. Laiba, Geography of Manipur, (Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996), 503.

    3 Fifteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), Report on Indigenous Issues, May 2016.

    4 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Art. 33, 2007.

    5 Government of Nagaland, Notification on Indigenous Inhabitant Status, No. Home/Sectt-1/8/94.

    6 Supreme Court of India, Kailas & Others v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, January 5, 2011.

    7 “State Cabinet Approves ST Status for 1313 Rongmeis,” Nagaland Post, May 9, 2024.

    8 Federation of Haomee (FOH), Resolution on Indigenous Communities and the Yek Salai System, 2019.

    9 O. Kumar Singh, Archaeological Finds in Manipur Caves, (Imphal: Anthropological Survey, 1983).

    10 Census of India 2001, Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur.

    11 Government of India, The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (as amended).

    12 T. A. Sharp, Standing Order of the President of the Manipur State Darbar, July 23, 1941.

    Bibliography

    Census of India 2001. Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

    Government of India. The Constitution of India. Articles 342 and 366(25).

    Jamir, Senayangba Chubatoshi. “Indigenous Identity in Nagaland.” Keynote address at the Nagaland Indigenous People’s Forum, Dimapur, October 27, 2019.

    Laiba, M. T. Geography of Manipur. Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996.

    Manipur State Darbar. Standing Orders of the President (PMSD). Order No. 2 of 1941.

    Singh, O. Kumar. Prehistoric Archaeology of Manipur. Imphal: State Museum Publications, 1983.

    United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Resolution 61/295. New York: UN, 2007.

    United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Report of the Fifteenth Session. New York: UN, 2016.

    Online Source Links (Plain Format)

    #History #India #Naga #News #NewsNorthEast #politics #RongmeiNaga #Zeliangrong
  3. Rongmei Encyclopedia @rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com@rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com ·

    The Legal Evolution of Indigenous Identity: Recognition of the Rongmei Tribe in Nagaland


    Introduction

    The socio-political landscape of Northeast India is frequently defined by the intersection of ancestral heritage and administrative classification. On May 9, 2024, a significant milestone was reached when the Nagaland government approved the issuance of Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates to 1,313 members of the Rongmei tribe who are permanently settled within the state.1 This decision addresses a long-standing grievance regarding the “indigenous” status of the Rongmei people in Nagaland, a community that also holds deep ancestral roots in Manipur and Assam. Understanding this development requires an analysis of the Zeliangrong identity and the rigorous criteria for “indigenous” recognition in the region.

    I. The Zeliangrong Heritage and the Rongmei Identity

    The Rongmei people are an integral branch of the Zeliangrong collective, a socio-cultural and political union comprising the Zeme, Liangmai, and Rongmei sub-tribes.2 Historically, these groups have shared a common ancestry and geographic continuity across the contiguous hill tracts of Manipur, Nagaland, and Assam.

    International standards, as defined by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), characterize indigenous peoples by their historical continuity, language, and ancestral occupation of lands prior to modern state formation.3 In the context of Nagaland, the Zeliang and Rongmei identities have been closely intertwined; however, the formal recognition of the Rongmei as a separate ST entity within Nagaland has faced unique hurdles compared to their status in Manipur, where they are recognized as a core indigenous group.4

    II. The Criteria for Indigenous Inhabitants in Nagaland

    The government’s recent approval is not a blanket recognition but is strictly bound by the “1963 Cut-off Date.” Under the Nagaland Land and Revenue Regulations, an “Indigenous Inhabitant” is defined as a person who settled in the state prior to December 1, 1963 (the date of Nagaland’s statehood).5

    This legal threshold is essential for several reasons:

    • Protection of Rights: Recognition grants access to reservation in government jobs and education, as well as the right to own land in protected areas.6
    • Genealogical Verification: The 1,313 approved individuals and their direct descendants were identified through a rigorous verification process conducted by the state-appointed Committee on Rongmei Indigenous Inhabitant of Nagaland.7

    III. Regional Comparisons: Manipur and the Yek Salai System

    The meaning of “Indigenous” for the Rongmei takes on a different legal dimension in neighboring Manipur. There, indigenous status is often validated through the “Yek Salai” system—a traditional clan classification system dating back to 33 CE.8 While Nagaland relies on a modern administrative cut-off (1963), Manipur’s traditionalists, such as the Federation of Haomee, argue for a definition based on “First Settler” status and ancestral village records.9

    In Manipur, the Rongmei, along with the Zeme and Liangmai (historically grouped as Kacha Nagas), are listed as Scheduled Tribes with a population of over 62,000 as of the 2001 Census.10 The disparity in population and recognition between the states has often led to identity fluctuations for Rongmei families living near the borders.

    IV. Neighbouring Tribes and the Scheduled Tribe List

    The Nagaland government’s decision must be viewed within the broader framework of the Scheduled Tribe list, which includes diverse Naga and non-Naga groups:

    1. Naga Tribes: Angami, Ao, Chakhesang, Chang, Konyak, Lotha, Phom, Pochury, Rengma, Sangtam, Sumi, Yimkhiung, Khiamniungan, and Zeliang (Zeme and Liangmai).11
    2. Neighboring Groups: The Kuki tribe, which shares borders with Zeliangrong areas, is also recognized, though historical standing orders from the British era sometimes distinguished between original settlers and later migrants.12

    Conclusion

    The approval of ST certificates for the Rongmei in Nagaland signifies a reconciliation between historical presence and legal documentation. By acknowledging those settled since 1963, the state recognizes the Rongmei as a legitimate component of its indigenous fabric while maintaining the integrity of its statehood-based eligibility criteria. This move reinforces the Zeliangrong bond and ensures that the Rongmei’s historical ties to the land are translated into contemporary socio-economic protections.

    Footnotes

    1 “Nagaland Govt Approves ST Certificates for Rongmei Tribe Members Settled in State,” The Sentinel Assam, May 10, 2024.

    2 M. T. Laiba, Geography of Manipur, (Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996), 503.

    3 Fifteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), Report on Indigenous Issues, May 2016.

    4 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Art. 33, 2007.

    5 Government of Nagaland, Notification on Indigenous Inhabitant Status, No. Home/Sectt-1/8/94.

    6 Supreme Court of India, Kailas & Others v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, January 5, 2011.

    7 “State Cabinet Approves ST Status for 1313 Rongmeis,” Nagaland Post, May 9, 2024.

    8 Federation of Haomee (FOH), Resolution on Indigenous Communities and the Yek Salai System, 2019.

    9 O. Kumar Singh, Archaeological Finds in Manipur Caves, (Imphal: Anthropological Survey, 1983).

    10 Census of India 2001, Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur.

    11 Government of India, The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (as amended).

    12 T. A. Sharp, Standing Order of the President of the Manipur State Darbar, July 23, 1941.

    Bibliography

    Census of India 2001. Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

    Government of India. The Constitution of India. Articles 342 and 366(25).

    Jamir, Senayangba Chubatoshi. “Indigenous Identity in Nagaland.” Keynote address at the Nagaland Indigenous People’s Forum, Dimapur, October 27, 2019.

    Laiba, M. T. Geography of Manipur. Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996.

    Manipur State Darbar. Standing Orders of the President (PMSD). Order No. 2 of 1941.

    Singh, O. Kumar. Prehistoric Archaeology of Manipur. Imphal: State Museum Publications, 1983.

    United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Resolution 61/295. New York: UN, 2007.

    United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Report of the Fifteenth Session. New York: UN, 2016.

    Online Source Links (Plain Format)

    #History #India #Naga #News #NewsNorthEast #politics #RongmeiNaga #Zeliangrong
  4. Rongmei Encyclopedia @rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com@rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com ·

    The Legal Evolution of Indigenous Identity: Recognition of the Rongmei Tribe in Nagaland


    Introduction

    The socio-political landscape of Northeast India is frequently defined by the intersection of ancestral heritage and administrative classification. On May 9, 2024, a significant milestone was reached when the Nagaland government approved the issuance of Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates to 1,313 members of the Rongmei tribe who are permanently settled within the state.1 This decision addresses a long-standing grievance regarding the “indigenous” status of the Rongmei people in Nagaland, a community that also holds deep ancestral roots in Manipur and Assam. Understanding this development requires an analysis of the Zeliangrong identity and the rigorous criteria for “indigenous” recognition in the region.

    I. The Zeliangrong Heritage and the Rongmei Identity

    The Rongmei people are an integral branch of the Zeliangrong collective, a socio-cultural and political union comprising the Zeme, Liangmai, and Rongmei sub-tribes.2 Historically, these groups have shared a common ancestry and geographic continuity across the contiguous hill tracts of Manipur, Nagaland, and Assam.

    International standards, as defined by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), characterize indigenous peoples by their historical continuity, language, and ancestral occupation of lands prior to modern state formation.3 In the context of Nagaland, the Zeliang and Rongmei identities have been closely intertwined; however, the formal recognition of the Rongmei as a separate ST entity within Nagaland has faced unique hurdles compared to their status in Manipur, where they are recognized as a core indigenous group.4

    II. The Criteria for Indigenous Inhabitants in Nagaland

    The government’s recent approval is not a blanket recognition but is strictly bound by the “1963 Cut-off Date.” Under the Nagaland Land and Revenue Regulations, an “Indigenous Inhabitant” is defined as a person who settled in the state prior to December 1, 1963 (the date of Nagaland’s statehood).5

    This legal threshold is essential for several reasons:

    • Protection of Rights: Recognition grants access to reservation in government jobs and education, as well as the right to own land in protected areas.6
    • Genealogical Verification: The 1,313 approved individuals and their direct descendants were identified through a rigorous verification process conducted by the state-appointed Committee on Rongmei Indigenous Inhabitant of Nagaland.7

    III. Regional Comparisons: Manipur and the Yek Salai System

    The meaning of “Indigenous” for the Rongmei takes on a different legal dimension in neighboring Manipur. There, indigenous status is often validated through the “Yek Salai” system—a traditional clan classification system dating back to 33 CE.8 While Nagaland relies on a modern administrative cut-off (1963), Manipur’s traditionalists, such as the Federation of Haomee, argue for a definition based on “First Settler” status and ancestral village records.9

    In Manipur, the Rongmei, along with the Zeme and Liangmai (historically grouped as Kacha Nagas), are listed as Scheduled Tribes with a population of over 62,000 as of the 2001 Census.10 The disparity in population and recognition between the states has often led to identity fluctuations for Rongmei families living near the borders.

    IV. Neighbouring Tribes and the Scheduled Tribe List

    The Nagaland government’s decision must be viewed within the broader framework of the Scheduled Tribe list, which includes diverse Naga and non-Naga groups:

    1. Naga Tribes: Angami, Ao, Chakhesang, Chang, Konyak, Lotha, Phom, Pochury, Rengma, Sangtam, Sumi, Yimkhiung, Khiamniungan, and Zeliang (Zeme and Liangmai).11
    2. Neighboring Groups: The Kuki tribe, which shares borders with Zeliangrong areas, is also recognized, though historical standing orders from the British era sometimes distinguished between original settlers and later migrants.12

    Conclusion

    The approval of ST certificates for the Rongmei in Nagaland signifies a reconciliation between historical presence and legal documentation. By acknowledging those settled since 1963, the state recognizes the Rongmei as a legitimate component of its indigenous fabric while maintaining the integrity of its statehood-based eligibility criteria. This move reinforces the Zeliangrong bond and ensures that the Rongmei’s historical ties to the land are translated into contemporary socio-economic protections.

    Footnotes

    1 “Nagaland Govt Approves ST Certificates for Rongmei Tribe Members Settled in State,” The Sentinel Assam, May 10, 2024.

    2 M. T. Laiba, Geography of Manipur, (Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996), 503.

    3 Fifteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), Report on Indigenous Issues, May 2016.

    4 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Art. 33, 2007.

    5 Government of Nagaland, Notification on Indigenous Inhabitant Status, No. Home/Sectt-1/8/94.

    6 Supreme Court of India, Kailas & Others v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, January 5, 2011.

    7 “State Cabinet Approves ST Status for 1313 Rongmeis,” Nagaland Post, May 9, 2024.

    8 Federation of Haomee (FOH), Resolution on Indigenous Communities and the Yek Salai System, 2019.

    9 O. Kumar Singh, Archaeological Finds in Manipur Caves, (Imphal: Anthropological Survey, 1983).

    10 Census of India 2001, Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur.

    11 Government of India, The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (as amended).

    12 T. A. Sharp, Standing Order of the President of the Manipur State Darbar, July 23, 1941.

    Bibliography

    Census of India 2001. Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

    Government of India. The Constitution of India. Articles 342 and 366(25).

    Jamir, Senayangba Chubatoshi. “Indigenous Identity in Nagaland.” Keynote address at the Nagaland Indigenous People’s Forum, Dimapur, October 27, 2019.

    Laiba, M. T. Geography of Manipur. Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996.

    Manipur State Darbar. Standing Orders of the President (PMSD). Order No. 2 of 1941.

    Singh, O. Kumar. Prehistoric Archaeology of Manipur. Imphal: State Museum Publications, 1983.

    United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Resolution 61/295. New York: UN, 2007.

    United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Report of the Fifteenth Session. New York: UN, 2016.

    Online Source Links (Plain Format)

    #History #India #Naga #News #NewsNorthEast #politics #RongmeiNaga #Zeliangrong
  5. Rongmei Encyclopedia @rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com@rongmeiencyclopedia.wordpress.com ·

    The Legal Evolution of Indigenous Identity: Recognition of the Rongmei Tribe in Nagaland


    Introduction

    The socio-political landscape of Northeast India is frequently defined by the intersection of ancestral heritage and administrative classification. On May 9, 2024, a significant milestone was reached when the Nagaland government approved the issuance of Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates to 1,313 members of the Rongmei tribe who are permanently settled within the state.1 This decision addresses a long-standing grievance regarding the “indigenous” status of the Rongmei people in Nagaland, a community that also holds deep ancestral roots in Manipur and Assam. Understanding this development requires an analysis of the Zeliangrong identity and the rigorous criteria for “indigenous” recognition in the region.

    I. The Zeliangrong Heritage and the Rongmei Identity

    The Rongmei people are an integral branch of the Zeliangrong collective, a socio-cultural and political union comprising the Zeme, Liangmai, and Rongmei sub-tribes.2 Historically, these groups have shared a common ancestry and geographic continuity across the contiguous hill tracts of Manipur, Nagaland, and Assam.

    International standards, as defined by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), characterize indigenous peoples by their historical continuity, language, and ancestral occupation of lands prior to modern state formation.3 In the context of Nagaland, the Zeliang and Rongmei identities have been closely intertwined; however, the formal recognition of the Rongmei as a separate ST entity within Nagaland has faced unique hurdles compared to their status in Manipur, where they are recognized as a core indigenous group.4

    II. The Criteria for Indigenous Inhabitants in Nagaland

    The government’s recent approval is not a blanket recognition but is strictly bound by the “1963 Cut-off Date.” Under the Nagaland Land and Revenue Regulations, an “Indigenous Inhabitant” is defined as a person who settled in the state prior to December 1, 1963 (the date of Nagaland’s statehood).5

    This legal threshold is essential for several reasons:

    • Protection of Rights: Recognition grants access to reservation in government jobs and education, as well as the right to own land in protected areas.6
    • Genealogical Verification: The 1,313 approved individuals and their direct descendants were identified through a rigorous verification process conducted by the state-appointed Committee on Rongmei Indigenous Inhabitant of Nagaland.7

    III. Regional Comparisons: Manipur and the Yek Salai System

    The meaning of “Indigenous” for the Rongmei takes on a different legal dimension in neighboring Manipur. There, indigenous status is often validated through the “Yek Salai” system—a traditional clan classification system dating back to 33 CE.8 While Nagaland relies on a modern administrative cut-off (1963), Manipur’s traditionalists, such as the Federation of Haomee, argue for a definition based on “First Settler” status and ancestral village records.9

    In Manipur, the Rongmei, along with the Zeme and Liangmai (historically grouped as Kacha Nagas), are listed as Scheduled Tribes with a population of over 62,000 as of the 2001 Census.10 The disparity in population and recognition between the states has often led to identity fluctuations for Rongmei families living near the borders.

    IV. Neighbouring Tribes and the Scheduled Tribe List

    The Nagaland government’s decision must be viewed within the broader framework of the Scheduled Tribe list, which includes diverse Naga and non-Naga groups:

    1. Naga Tribes: Angami, Ao, Chakhesang, Chang, Konyak, Lotha, Phom, Pochury, Rengma, Sangtam, Sumi, Yimkhiung, Khiamniungan, and Zeliang (Zeme and Liangmai).11
    2. Neighboring Groups: The Kuki tribe, which shares borders with Zeliangrong areas, is also recognized, though historical standing orders from the British era sometimes distinguished between original settlers and later migrants.12

    Conclusion

    The approval of ST certificates for the Rongmei in Nagaland signifies a reconciliation between historical presence and legal documentation. By acknowledging those settled since 1963, the state recognizes the Rongmei as a legitimate component of its indigenous fabric while maintaining the integrity of its statehood-based eligibility criteria. This move reinforces the Zeliangrong bond and ensures that the Rongmei’s historical ties to the land are translated into contemporary socio-economic protections.

    Footnotes

    1 “Nagaland Govt Approves ST Certificates for Rongmei Tribe Members Settled in State,” The Sentinel Assam, May 10, 2024.

    2 M. T. Laiba, Geography of Manipur, (Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996), 503.

    3 Fifteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), Report on Indigenous Issues, May 2016.

    4 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Art. 33, 2007.

    5 Government of Nagaland, Notification on Indigenous Inhabitant Status, No. Home/Sectt-1/8/94.

    6 Supreme Court of India, Kailas & Others v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, January 5, 2011.

    7 “State Cabinet Approves ST Status for 1313 Rongmeis,” Nagaland Post, May 9, 2024.

    8 Federation of Haomee (FOH), Resolution on Indigenous Communities and the Yek Salai System, 2019.

    9 O. Kumar Singh, Archaeological Finds in Manipur Caves, (Imphal: Anthropological Survey, 1983).

    10 Census of India 2001, Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur.

    11 Government of India, The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (as amended).

    12 T. A. Sharp, Standing Order of the President of the Manipur State Darbar, July 23, 1941.

    Bibliography

    Census of India 2001. Scheduled Tribes Population of Manipur. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

    Government of India. The Constitution of India. Articles 342 and 366(25).

    Jamir, Senayangba Chubatoshi. “Indigenous Identity in Nagaland.” Keynote address at the Nagaland Indigenous People’s Forum, Dimapur, October 27, 2019.

    Laiba, M. T. Geography of Manipur. Imphal: Angomcha Longjam Langmeiba Thangmeiband, 1996.

    Manipur State Darbar. Standing Orders of the President (PMSD). Order No. 2 of 1941.

    Singh, O. Kumar. Prehistoric Archaeology of Manipur. Imphal: State Museum Publications, 1983.

    United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Resolution 61/295. New York: UN, 2007.

    United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Report of the Fifteenth Session. New York: UN, 2016.

    Online Source Links (Plain Format)

    #History #India #Naga #News #NewsNorthEast #politics #RongmeiNaga #Zeliangrong
  6. [AT] Everyone goat carrying!
    - art trade with artfight.net/~Feral-EXE, got this cool pic of the two old alien goats Fyodor and Kitsune! - have a look at my part feat Velvet carrying Liam too!
    #spaceRARt #furryart #artforme #goat #naga #wolf #boyfriend #couple #armcarry

  7. [AT] Everyone goat carrying!
    - art trade with artfight.net/~Feral-EXE, got this cool pic of the two old alien goats Fyodor and Kitsune! - have a look at my part feat Velvet carrying Liam too!
    #spaceRARt #furryart #artforme #goat #naga #wolf #boyfriend #couple #armcarry

  8. [AT] Everyone goat carrying!
    - art trade with artfight.net/~Feral-EXE, got this cool pic of the two old alien goats Fyodor and Kitsune! - have a look at my part feat Velvet carrying Liam too!
    #spaceRARt #furryart #artforme #goat #naga #wolf #boyfriend #couple #armcarry

  9. [AT] Everyone goat carrying!
    - art trade with artfight.net/~Feral-EXE, got this cool pic of the two old alien goats Fyodor and Kitsune! - have a look at my part feat Velvet carrying Liam too!
    #spaceRARt #furryart #artforme #goat #naga #wolf #boyfriend #couple #armcarry

  10. I don't remember what prompted me to draw this cute little drawing of Eden and Rosie, but I love how it came out! These two are more fuck buddies than a full couple, but they're just too cute here, I couldn't help myself xD 

    pyperhaylie.carrd.co/
    #cute #valentinesday #eden #rosie #gnome #dso #hold #carry #snake #boar #anthro #furry #scaley #lamia #naga

  11. I don't remember what prompted me to draw this cute little drawing of Eden and Rosie, but I love how it came out! These two are more fuck buddies than a full couple, but they're just too cute here, I couldn't help myself xD 

    pyperhaylie.carrd.co/
    #cute #valentinesday #eden #rosie #gnome #dso #hold #carry #snake #boar #anthro #furry #scaley #lamia #naga

  12. The Naga Buddha is a revered image in Buddhist tradition. It depicts the Buddha protected by a naga, a serpent-like deity. This iconography is found in many Buddhist countries, especially in Southeast Asia.
    #ourbuddhismworld #wolink #Naga
    ourbuddhismworld.com/archives/

  13. Here's my OC Eden drawn in a 1920's speakeasy. I really liked this prompt at the gag stream and I think the dress turned out super cute! What do y'all think?

    pyperhaylie.carrd.co/
    Like my stuff? Check out these other NSFW artists: naughtynewsroom.carrd.co/
    #speakeasy #retro #eden #snake #lamia #naga #anthro #20s #twenties

  14. Here's my OC Eden drawn in a 1920's speakeasy. I really liked this prompt at the gag stream and I think the dress turned out super cute! What do y'all think?

    pyperhaylie.carrd.co/
    Like my stuff? Check out these other NSFW artists: naughtynewsroom.carrd.co/
    #speakeasy #retro #eden #snake #lamia #naga #anthro #20s #twenties

  15. After a long wait of over twelve months, we are releasing Veloren 0.18 on January 24th!

    The past year of work has included many new features and fixes, including:

    - switched from shaderc to #naga as the default shader compiler
    - airships now have defined routes traveling between many towns
    - directional lanterns
    - new tutorial system
    - controller button remapping in-game
    - basic quest system

    And much more!

    gitlab.com/veloren/veloren/-/b

  16. After a long wait of over twelve months, we are releasing Veloren 0.18 on January 24th!

    The past year of work has included many new features and fixes, including:

    - switched from shaderc to #naga as the default shader compiler
    - airships now have defined routes traveling between many towns
    - directional lanterns
    - new tutorial system
    - controller button remapping in-game
    - basic quest system

    And much more!

    gitlab.com/veloren/veloren/-/b

  17. After a long wait of over twelve months, we are releasing Veloren 0.18 on January 24th!

    The past year of work has included many new features and fixes, including:

    - switched from shaderc to #naga as the default shader compiler
    - airships now have defined routes traveling between many towns
    - directional lanterns
    - new tutorial system
    - controller button remapping in-game
    - basic quest system

    And much more!

    gitlab.com/veloren/veloren/-/b

  18. After a long wait of over twelve months, we are releasing Veloren 0.18 on January 24th!

    The past year of work has included many new features and fixes, including:

    - switched from shaderc to #naga as the default shader compiler
    - airships now have defined routes traveling between many towns
    - directional lanterns
    - new tutorial system
    - controller button remapping in-game
    - basic quest system

    And much more!

    gitlab.com/veloren/veloren/-/b

  19. After a long wait of over twelve months, we are releasing Veloren 0.18 on January 24th!

    The past year of work has included many new features and fixes, including:

    - switched from shaderc to #naga as the default shader compiler
    - airships now have defined routes traveling between many towns
    - directional lanterns
    - new tutorial system
    - controller button remapping in-game
    - basic quest system

    And much more!

    gitlab.com/veloren/veloren/-/b

  20. NOT BUILT FOR HUMANS: Impossible Temple Found in Cambodia

    This site was never meant to be easy to reach. Surrounded by water, cut off from land, and stripped of any obvious human access, Neak Pean defies everything we expect from an ancient temple.

    Watch full video here: youtu.be/tUcixg9Ld3I

    #praveenmohan #ancient #naga #temple #cambodia

  21. NOT BUILT FOR HUMANS: Impossible Temple Found in Cambodia

    This site was never meant to be easy to reach. Surrounded by water, cut off from land, and stripped of any obvious human access, Neak Pean defies everything we expect from an ancient temple.

    Watch full video here: youtu.be/tUcixg9Ld3I

    #praveenmohan #ancient #naga #temple #cambodia

  22. NOT BUILT FOR HUMANS: Impossible Temple Found in Cambodia

    This site was never meant to be easy to reach. Surrounded by water, cut off from land, and stripped of any obvious human access, Neak Pean defies everything we expect from an ancient temple.

    Watch full video here: youtu.be/tUcixg9Ld3I

    #praveenmohan #ancient #naga #temple #cambodia

  23. NOT BUILT FOR HUMANS: Impossible Temple Found in Cambodia

    This site was never meant to be easy to reach. Surrounded by water, cut off from land, and stripped of any obvious human access, Neak Pean defies everything we expect from an ancient temple.

    Watch full video here: youtu.be/tUcixg9Ld3I

    #praveenmohan #ancient #naga #temple #cambodia