#intermediaryliability — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #intermediaryliability, aggregated by home.social.
-
With Cox V. Sony The Supreme Court Provides Yet Another Internet-Protecting Decision
-
With Cox V. Sony The Supreme Court Provides Yet Another Internet-Protecting Decision
-
With Cox V. Sony The Supreme Court Provides Yet Another Internet-Protecting Decision
-
With Cox V. Sony The Supreme Court Provides Yet Another Internet-Protecting Decision
-
With Cox V. Sony The Supreme Court Provides Yet Another Internet-Protecting Decision
-
EFF To Court: Don’t Make Embedding Illegal
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/11/eff-to-court-dont-make-embedding-illegal/
-
Ron Wyden Is Begging His Colleagues To Stop Trying To Hand Trump A Censorship Weapon
-
Ron Wyden Is Begging His Colleagues To Stop Trying To Hand Trump A Censorship Weapon
-
Ron Wyden Is Begging His Colleagues To Stop Trying To Hand Trump A Censorship Weapon
-
Ron Wyden Is Begging His Colleagues To Stop Trying To Hand Trump A Censorship Weapon
-
Ron Wyden Is Begging His Colleagues To Stop Trying To Hand Trump A Censorship Weapon
-
On Section 230’s 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It’s Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad
-
On Section 230’s 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It’s Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad
-
On Section 230’s 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It’s Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad
-
On Section 230’s 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It’s Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad
-
On Section 230’s 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It’s Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad
-
Section 230 Turns 30; Both Parties Want It Gone—For Contradictory Reasons
-
Section 230 Turns 30; Both Parties Want It Gone—For Contradictory Reasons
-
Section 230 Turns 30; Both Parties Want It Gone—For Contradictory Reasons
-
Section 230 Turns 30; Both Parties Want It Gone—For Contradictory Reasons
-
Section 230 Turns 30; Both Parties Want It Gone—For Contradictory Reasons
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt https://alecmuffett.com/article/133605 #IntermediaryLiability #Section230 #censorship #gdpr #surveillance
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Li... -
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt https://alecmuffett.com/article/133605 #IntermediaryLiability #Section230 #censorship #gdpr #surveillance
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Li... -
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt https://alecmuffett.com/article/133605 #IntermediaryLiability #Section230 #censorship #gdpr #surveillance
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Li... -
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt https://alecmuffett.com/article/133605 #IntermediaryLiability #Section230 #censorship #gdpr #surveillance
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Li... -
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt https://alecmuffett.com/article/133605 #IntermediaryLiability #Section230 #censorship #gdpr #surveillance
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Li... -
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt
Oh dear:
Under this ruling, it appears that any website that hosts any user-generated content can be strictly liable if any of that content contains “sensitive personal data” about any person. But how the fuck are they supposed to handle that?
The basic answer is to pre-scan any user-generated content for anything that might later be deemed to be sensitive personal data and make sure it doesn’t get posted.
How would a platform do that?
#censorship #gdpr #intermediaryLiability #section230 #surveillance
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt
Oh dear:
Under this ruling, it appears that any website that hosts any user-generated content can be strictly liable if any of that content contains “sensitive personal data” about any person. But how the fuck are they supposed to handle that?
The basic answer is to pre-scan any user-generated content for anything that might later be deemed to be sensitive personal data and make sure it doesn’t get posted.
How would a platform do that?
#censorship #gdpr #intermediaryLiability #section230 #surveillance
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally | Techdirt
Oh dear:
Under this ruling, it appears that any website that hosts any user-generated content can be strictly liable if any of that content contains “sensitive personal data” about any person. But how the fuck are they supposed to handle that?
The basic answer is to pre-scan any user-generated content for anything that might later be deemed to be sensitive personal data and make sure it doesn’t get posted.
How would a platform do that?
#censorship #gdpr #intermediaryLiability #section230 #surveillance
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally
-
EU’s Top Court Just Made It Literally Impossible To Run A User-Generated Content Platform Legally
-
RECORDING – SCOTUS Cox v Sony Oral Arguments
AUDIO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On December 1, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, a case testing whether Internet service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement by their users when the ISP continues providing service after receiving repeated infringement notices.
Cox and the U.S. government argued that s
-
RECORDING – SCOTUS Cox v Sony Oral Arguments
AUDIO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On December 1, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, a case testing whether Internet service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement by their users when the ISP continues providing service after receiving repeated infringement notices.
Cox and the U.S. government argued that s
-
RECORDING – SCOTUS Cox v Sony Oral Arguments
AUDIO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On December 1, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, a case testing whether Internet service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement by their users when the ISP continues providing service after receiving repeated infringement notices.
Cox and the U.S. government argued that s
-
RECORDING – SCOTUS Cox v Sony Oral Arguments
AUDIO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On December 1, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, a case testing whether Internet service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement by their users when the ISP continues providing service after receiving repeated infringement notices.
Cox and the U.S. government argued that s
-
RECORDING – SCOTUS Cox v Sony Oral Arguments
AUDIO | RECAP | ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
On December 1, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, a case testing whether Internet service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement by their users when the ISP continues providing service after receiving repeated infringement notices.
Cox and the U.S. government argued that s
-
SUMMARY + RESORCES – Internet Society Amicus Brief in Cox v. Sony – US Supreme Court – September 2025
FILING (ISOC) | SUMMARY + RESOURCES (Patreon)
ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
In the case of Cox v. Sony, in 2019, a Virginia jury awarded roughly $1 billion in statutory damages to a group of record labels, led by Sony, ruling that Cox had 'secondary liability' for copyright infringement by its users. In 2024, the Fou
-
SUMMARY + RESORCES – Internet Society Amicus Brief in Cox v. Sony – US Supreme Court – September 2025
FILING (ISOC) | SUMMARY + RESOURCES (Patreon)
ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
In the case of Cox v. Sony, in 2019, a Virginia jury awarded roughly $1 billion in statutory damages to a group of record labels, led by Sony, ruling that Cox had 'secondary liability' for copyright infringement by its users. In 2024, the Fou
-
SUMMARY + RESORCES – Internet Society Amicus Brief in Cox v. Sony – US Supreme Court – September 2025
FILING (ISOC) | SUMMARY + RESOURCES (Patreon)
ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
In the case of Cox v. Sony, in 2019, a Virginia jury awarded roughly $1 billion in statutory damages to a group of record labels, led by Sony, ruling that Cox had 'secondary liability' for copyright infringement by its users. In 2024, the Fou
-
SUMMARY + RESORCES – Internet Society Amicus Brief in Cox v. Sony – US Supreme Court – September 2025
FILING (ISOC) | SUMMARY + RESOURCES (Patreon)
ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
In the case of Cox v. Sony, in 2019, a Virginia jury awarded roughly $1 billion in statutory damages to a group of record labels, led by Sony, ruling that Cox had 'secondary liability' for copyright infringement by its users. In 2024, the Fou
-
SUMMARY + RESORCES – Internet Society Amicus Brief in Cox v. Sony – US Supreme Court – September 2025
FILING (ISOC) | SUMMARY + RESOURCES (Patreon)
ARCHIVE | PERMALINK
In the case of Cox v. Sony, in 2019, a Virginia jury awarded roughly $1 billion in statutory damages to a group of record labels, led by Sony, ruling that Cox had 'secondary liability' for copyright infringement by its users. In 2024, the Fou
-
WEBCAST AUG 7 – WEBCAST AUG 7 – ISOC Brasil – Responsabilidade de intermediários digitais: abordagens, limites e possibilidades | ISOC Brazil – Responsibility of Digital Intermediaries: Approaches, Limits, and Possibilities
Na quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2024, das 9h-10h30 BRT (12:00 - 13:30 ) o Capítulo Internet Society Brasil realiza um webinar 'Responsabilidade de intermediários digitais: abordagens, li
-
WEBCAST AUG 7 – WEBCAST AUG 7 – ISOC Brasil – Responsabilidade de intermediários digitais: abordagens, limites e possibilidades | ISOC Brazil – Responsibility of Digital Intermediaries: Approaches, Limits, and Possibilities
Na quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2024, das 9h-10h30 BRT (12:00 - 13:30 ) o Capítulo Internet Society Brasil realiza um webinar 'Responsabilidade de intermediários digitais: abordagens, li