#citationimpact — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #citationimpact, aggregated by home.social.
-
A new study on citation impact (in the field of sleep disorders) finds that "only 27.7% of articles exceeded their journal’s #JIF, while 72.3% fell below it."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-026-03735-7PS: In other words, about three-fourths of articles that might use their journal's impact factor as a bragging point (advertisement, credential, distinction, tribute) actually drag down the journal's average citation impact. Another reason why it's wrong to judge articles (and authors) by journal-based metrics.
-
A new study on citation impact (in the field of sleep disorders) finds that "only 27.7% of articles exceeded their journal’s #JIF, while 72.3% fell below it."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-026-03735-7PS: In other words, about three-fourths of articles that might use their journal's impact factor as a bragging point (advertisement, credential, distinction, tribute) actually drag down the journal's average citation impact. Another reason why it's wrong to judge articles (and authors) by journal-based metrics.
-
A new study on citation impact (in the field of sleep disorders) finds that "only 27.7% of articles exceeded their journal’s #JIF, while 72.3% fell below it."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-026-03735-7PS: In other words, about three-fourths of articles that might use their journal's impact factor as a bragging point (advertisement, credential, distinction, tribute) actually drag down the journal's average citation impact. Another reason why it's wrong to judge articles (and authors) by journal-based metrics.
-
A new study on citation impact (in the field of sleep disorders) finds that "only 27.7% of articles exceeded their journal’s #JIF, while 72.3% fell below it."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-026-03735-7PS: In other words, about three-fourths of articles that might use their journal's impact factor as a bragging point (advertisement, credential, distinction, tribute) actually drag down the journal's average citation impact. Another reason why it's wrong to judge articles (and authors) by journal-based metrics.
-
A new study on citation impact (in the field of sleep disorders) finds that "only 27.7% of articles exceeded their journal’s #JIF, while 72.3% fell below it."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-026-03735-7PS: In other words, about three-fourths of articles that might use their journal's impact factor as a bragging point (advertisement, credential, distinction, tribute) actually drag down the journal's average citation impact. Another reason why it's wrong to judge articles (and authors) by journal-based metrics.
-
⚡ Monitoring research paper performance is one way we track #ResearchImpact 💪
👏 Our bibliometrics report shows IMI ranks 1st against other funders for high #CitationImpact!
🎉 Almost 1/3 of IMI papers are in the top 10% in their field.
👉 More: https://lnkd.in/eiErzBjv
#IHITransformingHealth #EUResearch -
⚡ Monitoring research paper performance is one way we track #ResearchImpact 💪
👏 Our bibliometrics report shows IMI ranks 1st against other funders for high #CitationImpact!
🎉 Almost 1/3 of IMI papers are in the top 10% in their field.
👉 More: https://lnkd.in/eiErzBjv
#IHITransformingHealth #EUResearch -
⚡ Monitoring research paper performance is one way we track #ResearchImpact 💪
👏 Our bibliometrics report shows IMI ranks 1st against other funders for high #CitationImpact!
🎉 Almost 1/3 of IMI papers are in the top 10% in their field.
👉 More: https://lnkd.in/eiErzBjv
#IHITransformingHealth #EUResearch -
⚡ Monitoring research paper performance is one way we track #ResearchImpact 💪
👏 Our bibliometrics report shows IMI ranks 1st against other funders for high #CitationImpact!
🎉 Almost 1/3 of IMI papers are in the top 10% in their field.
👉 More: https://lnkd.in/eiErzBjv
#IHITransformingHealth #EUResearch -
⚡ Monitoring research paper performance is one way we track #ResearchImpact 💪
👏 Our bibliometrics report shows IMI ranks 1st against other funders for high #CitationImpact!
🎉 Almost 1/3 of IMI papers are in the top 10% in their field.
👉 More: https://lnkd.in/eiErzBjv
#IHITransformingHealth #EUResearch -
Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences
#AHIP #CitationImpact #ErinWatson #HealthSciences #LiZhang #PredatoryJournals #ScholarlyJournals #ScientificCommunication
-
New study: "In the first three years after accusations became public, scholars accused of sexual misconduct incur a larger citation penalty than scholars accused of scientific misconduct. However, when asked to predict their citing behavior, scholars indicated the reverse pattern, suggesting they might mis-predict their behavior or be reluctant to disclose their preferences."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317736 -
New study: "In the first three years after accusations became public, scholars accused of sexual misconduct incur a larger citation penalty than scholars accused of scientific misconduct. However, when asked to predict their citing behavior, scholars indicated the reverse pattern, suggesting they might mis-predict their behavior or be reluctant to disclose their preferences."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317736 -
New study: "In the first three years after accusations became public, scholars accused of sexual misconduct incur a larger citation penalty than scholars accused of scientific misconduct. However, when asked to predict their citing behavior, scholars indicated the reverse pattern, suggesting they might mis-predict their behavior or be reluctant to disclose their preferences."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317736 -
New study: "In the first three years after accusations became public, scholars accused of sexual misconduct incur a larger citation penalty than scholars accused of scientific misconduct. However, when asked to predict their citing behavior, scholars indicated the reverse pattern, suggesting they might mis-predict their behavior or be reluctant to disclose their preferences."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317736 -
New study: "In the first three years after accusations became public, scholars accused of sexual misconduct incur a larger citation penalty than scholars accused of scientific misconduct. However, when asked to predict their citing behavior, scholars indicated the reverse pattern, suggesting they might mis-predict their behavior or be reluctant to disclose their preferences."
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317736 -
New research reveals that papers with a diverse age range of co-authors tend to have a higher citation impact! 📊
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130096
The more varied the academic ages, the more influential the research in economics, engineering, computer science, and physics.
Collaboration across generations = key to success! 🚀
-
New research reveals that papers with a diverse age range of co-authors tend to have a higher citation impact! 📊
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130096
The more varied the academic ages, the more influential the research in economics, engineering, computer science, and physics.
Collaboration across generations = key to success! 🚀
-
New research reveals that papers with a diverse age range of co-authors tend to have a higher citation impact! 📊
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130096
The more varied the academic ages, the more influential the research in economics, engineering, computer science, and physics.
Collaboration across generations = key to success! 🚀
-
New research reveals that papers with a diverse age range of co-authors tend to have a higher citation impact! 📊
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130096
The more varied the academic ages, the more influential the research in economics, engineering, computer science, and physics.
Collaboration across generations = key to success! 🚀
-
New research reveals that papers with a diverse age range of co-authors tend to have a higher citation impact! 📊
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130096
The more varied the academic ages, the more influential the research in economics, engineering, computer science, and physics.
Collaboration across generations = key to success! 🚀
-
New study: "Greater #collaboration…results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average [citation] impact than the world average."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04973-w -
New study: "Greater #collaboration…results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average [citation] impact than the world average."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04973-w -
New study: "Greater #collaboration…results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average [citation] impact than the world average."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04973-w -
New study: "Greater #collaboration…results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average [citation] impact than the world average."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04973-w -
New study: "Greater #collaboration…results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average [citation] impact than the world average."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04973-w -
On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
https://microblogging.infodocs.eu/2024/03/11/on-the-peer-review-reports-does-size-matter/
#AbdelghaniMaddi #Bibliometrics #CitationImpact #LuisMiotti #OpenPeerReview #PeerReview #ResearchEvaluation #ResearchQuality #ScholarlyPublishing #ScientificCommunication
-
New study: When the journal, Neuropsychopharmacology, studied its own articles (a mix of #GreenOA, #GoldOA, #BronzeOA, and non-OA or #paywalled), it found that "easily accessible article content is most often cited by readers, but that the higher #APCs of #Hybrid tier publishing may not guarantee increased scholarly or social impact."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-024-01796-4 -
New study: When the journal, Neuropsychopharmacology, studied its own articles (a mix of #GreenOA, #GoldOA, #BronzeOA, and non-OA or #paywalled), it found that "easily accessible article content is most often cited by readers, but that the higher #APCs of #Hybrid tier publishing may not guarantee increased scholarly or social impact."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-024-01796-4 -
New study: When the journal, Neuropsychopharmacology, studied its own articles (a mix of #GreenOA, #GoldOA, #BronzeOA, and non-OA or #paywalled), it found that "easily accessible article content is most often cited by readers, but that the higher #APCs of #Hybrid tier publishing may not guarantee increased scholarly or social impact."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-024-01796-4 -
New study: When the journal, Neuropsychopharmacology, studied its own articles (a mix of #GreenOA, #GoldOA, #BronzeOA, and non-OA or #paywalled), it found that "easily accessible article content is most often cited by readers, but that the higher #APCs of #Hybrid tier publishing may not guarantee increased scholarly or social impact."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-024-01796-4 -
New study: When the journal, Neuropsychopharmacology, studied its own articles (a mix of #GreenOA, #GoldOA, #BronzeOA, and non-OA or #paywalled), it found that "easily accessible article content is most often cited by readers, but that the higher #APCs of #Hybrid tier publishing may not guarantee increased scholarly or social impact."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-024-01796-4 -
I mean… What’s next? Some #Academics with bloated #HFactor will start addressing the “Matthew Effect” of the #CitationImpact part of #PublishOrPerish? And advocate for more appropriate measures of #Scholarship including #SocialImpact and #EpistemicJustice?
Sounds unlikely.
-
I mean… What’s next? Some #Academics with bloated #HFactor will start addressing the “Matthew Effect” of the #CitationImpact part of #PublishOrPerish? And advocate for more appropriate measures of #Scholarship including #SocialImpact and #EpistemicJustice?
Sounds unlikely.
-
I mean… What’s next? Some #Academics with bloated #HFactor will start addressing the “Matthew Effect” of the #CitationImpact part of #PublishOrPerish? And advocate for more appropriate measures of #Scholarship including #SocialImpact and #EpistemicJustice?
Sounds unlikely.
-
I mean… What’s next? Some #Academics with bloated #HFactor will start addressing the “Matthew Effect” of the #CitationImpact part of #PublishOrPerish? And advocate for more appropriate measures of #Scholarship including #SocialImpact and #EpistemicJustice?
Sounds unlikely.
-
I mean… What’s next? Some #Academics with bloated #HFactor will start addressing the “Matthew Effect” of the #CitationImpact part of #PublishOrPerish? And advocate for more appropriate measures of #Scholarship including #SocialImpact and #EpistemicJustice?
Sounds unlikely.
-
Speaking of #OpenEducation…
In my curation of academic texts about #OERs and other dimensions of the OE movement, those which cite @Zawacki_Richter keep coming up. #ImpactfulCitation #CitationImpact -
Speaking of #OpenEducation…
In my curation of academic texts about #OERs and other dimensions of the OE movement, those which cite @Zawacki_Richter keep coming up. #ImpactfulCitation #CitationImpact -
Speaking of #OpenEducation…
In my curation of academic texts about #OERs and other dimensions of the OE movement, those which cite @Zawacki_Richter keep coming up. #ImpactfulCitation #CitationImpact -
Speaking of #OpenEducation…
In my curation of academic texts about #OERs and other dimensions of the OE movement, those which cite @Zawacki_Richter keep coming up. #ImpactfulCitation #CitationImpact