home.social

Search

277 results for “danielskatz”

  1. A new paper about @joss

    "The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): Bringing Open-Source Software Practices to the Scholarly Publishing Community for Authors, Reviewers, Editors, and Publishers"

    doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.18285

  2. "How do official software citation formats evolve over time? A longitudinal analysis of R programming language packages"

    by Yuzhuo Wang and @nalsi

    in Scientometrics

    doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-050

    (unfortunately not open access, but there's a preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2307.09390)

  3. An interesting new tool to promote and credit in :

    The Software Citation Station: a website for making citing software used in your research quick and easy

    by Tom Wagg & Floor Broekgaarden

    tomwagg.com/software-citation-

    (and a paper about this, now on GitHub, soon to be on arXiv: github.com/TomWagg/software-ci)

  4. This paper on looks interesting, though I haven't read it in detail yet

    How do software citation formats evolve over time? A longitudinal analysis of R programming language packages

    by Yyzhuo Wang and @nalsi

    arxiv.org/abs/2307.09390

  5. Interesting read on :

    "A multi-level analysis of data quality for formal software citation" by David Schindler, Tazin Hossain, Sascha Spors, @frankkrueger

    arxiv.org/abs/2306.17535

    From the abstract: The results show that software articles are the most cited resource for software, while direct software citations are better suited for identification of software versions. Moreover, we found current practices ... to be unsuited to represent these direct software citations

  6. I'm very happy to see the report from last summer's Software Citation Workshop is now out

    arxiv.org/abs/2302.07500

    (by Daina Bouquin, Ana Trisovic, Oliver Bertuch, @elenarchivist)

  7. Tomorrow & Wednesday will be a virtual workshop on "Software Citation and Recognition in HEP"

    If you're interested in & credit for software developers & maintainers in High Energy Physics , feel free to register and join us.

    The meeting, jointly organized by HSF & IRIS-HEP, aims at community discussion around how HEP experiments handle citation of software & recognition for software efforts that enable physics results disseminated to the public.

    indico.cern.ch/event/1211229/

  8. Announcing a virtual mini-workshop on and Recognition in High Energy Physics, w/ discussion & ideas for improvement: 2 half-days 22-23 Nov 2022, organized by @hepsoftfound & @iris_hep

    See indico.cern.ch/event/1211229/ to register

  9. JOSS is the Journal of Open Source Software, btw: joss.theoj.org

    It's a diamond open access journal that uses issues for collaborative open of software and short papers to provide developers and maintainers in academia placeholder papers that fit the scholarly publishing system (while we also try to change the system to encourage direct )

  10. 📢 We need your feedback! Help shape the future of open scholarly infrastructure by reviewing the proposed Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) 2.0 revisions and sharing your thoughts.

    These updates, drafted by the ~20 current adopters based on real-world experience, aim to make POSI even more practical, effective, and relevant.

    Survey closes March 5, 2025.

    🔗 Review & Participate: openscholarlyinfrastructure.or
    #POSI #OpenScholarlyInfrastructure

  11. 📢 We need your feedback! Help shape the future of open scholarly infrastructure by reviewing the proposed Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) 2.0 revisions and sharing your thoughts.

    These updates, drafted by the ~20 current adopters based on real-world experience, aim to make POSI even more practical, effective, and relevant.

    Survey closes March 5, 2025.

    🔗 Review & Participate: openscholarlyinfrastructure.or
    #POSI #OpenScholarlyInfrastructure

  12. 📢 We need your feedback! Help shape the future of open scholarly infrastructure by reviewing the proposed Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) 2.0 revisions and sharing your thoughts.

    These updates, drafted by the ~20 current adopters based on real-world experience, aim to make POSI even more practical, effective, and relevant.

    Survey closes March 5, 2025.

    🔗 Review & Participate: openscholarlyinfrastructure.or
    #POSI #OpenScholarlyInfrastructure

  13. 📢 We need your feedback! Help shape the future of open scholarly infrastructure by reviewing the proposed Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) 2.0 revisions and sharing your thoughts.

    These updates, drafted by the ~20 current adopters based on real-world experience, aim to make POSI even more practical, effective, and relevant.

    Survey closes March 5, 2025.

    🔗 Review & Participate: openscholarlyinfrastructure.or
    #POSI #OpenScholarlyInfrastructure

  14. In the booth at , we've gained orchids (but not ORCIDs)

  15. Reminder: US-RSE (the US Research Software Engineer Association) is seeking nominations (including self-) for 4 seats on its steering committee. 2 of us currently on the SC are not running again, so there will be 2 completely open seats, plus 2 seats up for election that are held by current members who are running again. Nominations are due 4 Nov 2022. See us-rse.org/about/election/ for more information

  16. I found two new birds while in Brussels for and : Common Pochard and Short-toed Treecreeper

  17. This meeting might win the logo contest

  18. I'm surprised to learn that the EuroHPC Summit (eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/events/eu) will be Gothenburg next week, as will RDA P20 (rd-alliance.org/plenaries/rda-). I feel like I'm one of few people who overlap between and , but maybe I'm wrong and these two events will have significant crossover. In any event, I'm looking forward to being surprised by people I didn't expect to see while walking around town.

  19. Claire holding the spot for the group photo

  20. A nice walk around City Hill with good views, looking around Salzburg on a lovely sunny afternoon - a short break from

  21. @[email protected] I agree. Policies about citation (whether data or software) should be community-defined, not publisher created, though of course, publishers can add more specific guidance on top of the community standards. People submitting preprints should be following community standards, even if the preprint server doesn't enforce this.

  22. I'm mildly surprised to find that only about 55% ($400m of $731m) of the research funding at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign is federal. I would have guessed it was closer to 80%.

    I looked this up during a discussion in the Funders Forum going on now, after a talk from Maryam Zaringhalam from OSTP. The data is from the university's most recent (FY21) research report: research.illinois.edu/sites/de

  23. A follow-up slide on and geography from Hilary Hanahoe

  24. It’s interesting that the Funders Forum agenda seems so US-dominated in terms of speakers/leaders. I think the Funders Forum itself and the RDA overall are quite international, with perhaps a plurality of members from Europe, and this meeting is in Europe

  25. Getting ready to start the last day of

  26. Things seen in Rio and to/in/from Itatiaia Nacional Park in Brazil in mid-April (40/x): Blue-billed Black-Tyrant

    #Birds #BirdPhotography #Brazil

  27. The poster I’m co-presenting tonight is now up.