home.social

Search

62 results for “heapwolf”

  1. @heapwolf

    Hi there. I fully agree with your opinion to . While I think that the federated nature of the is still better than the siloes of that we have to endure today, it still has flaws. With P2P we can achieve more.

    I made a (still very alpha) GitHub repo called ItIsMine. It is about how to get a better system for and that allows us to and prevent any vendor or platform lock in.

    Any input very welcome!

    github.com/MarkusEicher/ItIsMi

  2. @heapwolf

    This European is. These goons of make billions but are ok with a simple TOS term to disallow as countermeasure to . You can't eat as much as you like to puke. 🤮

  3. opportunity.

  4. I happen to enjoy reading code. And as the world fills with slop, and people become even less competent, i just become more powerful. muhahahaha. 🏴‍☠️

  5. forced reckoning.

  6. So where's the new github?

  7. > 1.6% of Claude Code is Al. 98.4% is the system around it.

    Yeah. this tracks.

  8. i ran a bunch of old code though claude to generate some git usage data for a project, i've gotta admit, it made some good decisions, and some absolutely mind numbingly bad decisions, overall pretty interesting to see it try things, but i think it's still a slop machine.

  9. Lol marketing people.

  10. enabled hardware is cool. Every compiler engineer should be looking at the potential for using hardware-level pointer capabilities.

  11. Is there an AI model named yet?

  12. who's writing about , or in systems programming (with under 1K followers) who i should follow?

  13. who's writing about #compilers, #pldesign or #observability in systems programming (with under 1K followers) who i should follow?

  14. who's writing about #compilers, #pldesign or #observability in systems programming (with under 1K followers) who i should follow?

  15. who's writing about #compilers, #pldesign or #observability in systems programming (with under 1K followers) who i should follow?

  16. who's writing about #compilers, #pldesign or #observability in systems programming (with under 1K followers) who i should follow?

  17. Preferisco l'architettura più antica, ma la di Berlino è straordinariamente bella.

  18. Preferisco l'architettura più antica, ma la #Filarmonica di Berlino è straordinariamente bella.

  19. Preferisco l'architettura più antica, ma la #Filarmonica di Berlino è straordinariamente bella.

  20. Preferisco l'architettura più antica, ma la #Filarmonica di Berlino è straordinariamente bella.

  21. if you're using and trying to transition away from it, our professional services team is ready to help you — at no charge.

  22. About 6 months in, we uncovered so many design and reliability problems with Hyperswarm we decided to abandon it entirely and look at .

    To our surprise, it wasn’t able to handle most kinds of NAT traversal, it was a huge code base, it was extremely complex, and had no actual spec. In fact, nothing in the P2P space had a spec. We started sweating bullets. Was it all bullshit? Did no one know what they were doing?

  23. A #Sybilattack is relevant for identity and reputation systems (This falls into the consensus bucket; the main P2P buckets are Network, Storage, Compute, or Consensus).

    Not all #P2P protocols or applications need consensus, they may use modern, asynchronous cryptography like MLS to identify. So who cares about group consensus and who should be concerned with this attack vector?

  24. A is relevant for identity and reputation systems (This falls into the consensus bucket; the main P2P buckets are Network, Storage, Compute, or Consensus).

    Not all protocols or applications need consensus, they may use modern, asynchronous cryptography like MLS to identify. So who cares about group consensus and who should be concerned with this attack vector?

  25. A #Sybilattack is relevant for identity and reputation systems (This falls into the consensus bucket; the main P2P buckets are Network, Storage, Compute, or Consensus).

    Not all #P2P protocols or applications need consensus, they may use modern, asynchronous cryptography like MLS to identify. So who cares about group consensus and who should be concerned with this attack vector?

  26. A #Sybilattack is relevant for identity and reputation systems (This falls into the consensus bucket; the main P2P buckets are Network, Storage, Compute, or Consensus).

    Not all #P2P protocols or applications need consensus, they may use modern, asynchronous cryptography like MLS to identify. So who cares about group consensus and who should be concerned with this attack vector?

  27. A #Sybilattack is relevant for identity and reputation systems (This falls into the consensus bucket; the main P2P buckets are Network, Storage, Compute, or Consensus).

    Not all #P2P protocols or applications need consensus, they may use modern, asynchronous cryptography like MLS to identify. So who cares about group consensus and who should be concerned with this attack vector?

  28. > P2P does not solve MITM attack problem P2P does not solve MITM attack problem, and most existing implementations do not use out-of-band messages for the initial key exchange.

    ❌ False. Use a search engine and enter the term “Message Layer Security”. A now standard for asynchronous secure group messages — proving post compromise and perfect forward without a central system.