home.social

#libuv — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #libuv, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @mdhughes since when and how so? all I'm aware of is #swish, which runs in a single OS thread and uses #libuv for async io (same as Node.js I believe)

  2. @mdhughes since when and how so? all I'm aware of is #swish, which runs in a single OS thread and uses #libuv for async io (same as Node.js I believe)

  3. @mdhughes since when and how so? all I'm aware of is #swish, which runs in a single OS thread and uses #libuv for async io (same as Node.js I believe)

  4. @mdhughes since when and how so? all I'm aware of is #swish, which runs in a single OS thread and uses #libuv for async io (same as Node.js I believe)

  5. @mdhughes since when and how so? all I'm aware of is #swish, which runs in a single OS thread and uses #libuv for async io (same as Node.js I believe)

  6. At a very basic core level, a comparison between @deno_land 2.0 and @nodejs could probably be summarised as:

    - JS-runtime: Both uses V8
    - Asynchronous I/O: Node.js uses #libuv, Deno uses #tokiors
    - Native code: Node.js uses C++, Deno uses Rust

    So essentially it boils down to libuv vs tokio and C++ vs rust

    If one ignore everything else about Node.js and Deno, the winner is clear to me.

  7. At a very basic core level, a comparison between @deno_land 2.0 and @nodejs could probably be summarised as:

    - JS-runtime: Both uses V8
    - Asynchronous I/O: Node.js uses #libuv, Deno uses #tokiors
    - Native code: Node.js uses C++, Deno uses Rust

    So essentially it boils down to libuv vs tokio and C++ vs rust

    If one ignore everything else about Node.js and Deno, the winner is clear to me.

  8. At a very basic core level, a comparison between @deno_land 2.0 and @nodejs could probably be summarised as:

    - JS-runtime: Both uses V8
    - Asynchronous I/O: Node.js uses #libuv, Deno uses #tokiors
    - Native code: Node.js uses C++, Deno uses Rust

    So essentially it boils down to libuv vs tokio and C++ vs rust

    If one ignore everything else about Node.js and Deno, the winner is clear to me.

  9. At a very basic core level, a comparison between @deno_land 2.0 and @nodejs could probably be summarised as:

    - JS-runtime: Both uses V8
    - Asynchronous I/O: Node.js uses #libuv, Deno uses #tokiors
    - Native code: Node.js uses C++, Deno uses Rust

    So essentially it boils down to libuv vs tokio and C++ vs rust

    If one ignore everything else about Node.js and Deno, the winner is clear to me.

  10. At a very basic core level, a comparison between @deno_land 2.0 and @nodejs could probably be summarised as:

    - JS-runtime: Both uses V8
    - Asynchronous I/O: Node.js uses #libuv, Deno uses #tokiors
    - Native code: Node.js uses C++, Deno uses Rust

    So essentially it boils down to libuv vs tokio and C++ vs rust

    If one ignore everything else about Node.js and Deno, the winner is clear to me.

  11. Красно-черные сигналы в node.js

    Что происходит, когда мы отправляем сигнал приложению на node.js? Когда вызываются обработчики? А где хранятся? Во всем этом мы разберемся в данной статье, начиная от пользовательского кода на javascript и до встречи с операционной системой.

    habr.com/ru/articles/840108/

    #javascript #nodejs #libuv #красночерное_дерево #epoll #linux #сигналы

  12. Красно-черные сигналы в node.js

    Что происходит, когда мы отправляем сигнал приложению на node.js? Когда вызываются обработчики? А где хранятся? Во всем этом мы разберемся в данной статье, начиная от пользовательского кода на javascript и до встречи с операционной системой.

    habr.com/ru/articles/840108/

    #javascript #nodejs #libuv #красночерное_дерево #epoll #linux #сигналы

  13. Красно-черные сигналы в node.js

    Что происходит, когда мы отправляем сигнал приложению на node.js? Когда вызываются обработчики? А где хранятся? Во всем этом мы разберемся в данной статье, начиная от пользовательского кода на javascript и до встречи с операционной системой.

    habr.com/ru/articles/840108/

    #javascript #nodejs #libuv #красночерное_дерево #epoll #linux #сигналы

  14. Куча таймеров в node.js

    А знаете ли вы, как на самом деле работают таймеры в node.js? В этой статье мы разберемся, как хранятся таймеры, когда запускаются и как в целом все работает вплоть до системных вызовов.

    habr.com/ru/articles/830644/

    #javascript #nodejs #libuv #куча #очередь #epoll #linux #таймеры

  15. Куча таймеров в node.js

    А знаете ли вы, как на самом деле работают таймеры в node.js? В этой статье мы разберемся, как хранятся таймеры, когда запускаются и как в целом все работает вплоть до системных вызовов.

    habr.com/ru/articles/830644/

    #javascript #nodejs #libuv #куча #очередь #epoll #linux #таймеры

  16. Куча таймеров в node.js

    А знаете ли вы, как на самом деле работают таймеры в node.js? В этой статье мы разберемся, как хранятся таймеры, когда запускаются и как в целом все работает вплоть до системных вызовов.

    habr.com/ru/articles/830644/

    #javascript #nodejs #libuv #куча #очередь #epoll #linux #таймеры

  17. Funsies: node-gyp is broken on latest kernel.

    Likely some other libuv stuff as well. In case you're experiencing more weirdness than usual, consider a downgrade :blobcatthumbsup:​

    github.com/nodejs/node/issues/

    #nodejs #linux #libuv

  18. Funsies: node-gyp is broken on latest kernel.

    Likely some other libuv stuff as well. In case you're experiencing more weirdness than usual, consider a downgrade :blobcatthumbsup:​

    github.com/nodejs/node/issues/

    #nodejs #linux #libuv

  19. Funsies: node-gyp is broken on latest kernel.

    Likely some other libuv stuff as well. In case you're experiencing more weirdness than usual, consider a downgrade :blobcatthumbsup:​

    github.com/nodejs/node/issues/

    #nodejs #linux #libuv

  20. Funsies: node-gyp is broken on latest kernel.

    Likely some other libuv stuff as well. In case you're experiencing more weirdness than usual, consider a downgrade :blobcatthumbsup:​

    github.com/nodejs/node/issues/

    #nodejs #linux #libuv

  21. Funsies: node-gyp is broken on latest kernel.

    Likely some other libuv stuff as well. In case you're experiencing more weirdness than usual, consider a downgrade :blobcatthumbsup:​

    github.com/nodejs/node/issues/

    #nodejs #linux #libuv

  22. Does anyone know what a #libuv / #nodejs uv_write_cb status of -89 means? I'm seeing:

    STREAM 18901: do read
    STREAM 18901: onWriteComplete -89 undefined
    Error: ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED: Error [ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED]: Cannot call write after a stream was destroyed

    In my logs with NODE_DEBUG=stream enabled, full stacktrace at: github.com/websockets/ws/issue

  23. Does anyone know what a #libuv / #nodejs uv_write_cb status of -89 means? I'm seeing:

    STREAM 18901: do read
    STREAM 18901: onWriteComplete -89 undefined
    Error: ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED: Error [ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED]: Cannot call write after a stream was destroyed

    In my logs with NODE_DEBUG=stream enabled, full stacktrace at: github.com/websockets/ws/issue

  24. Does anyone know what a / uv_write_cb status of -89 means? I'm seeing:

    STREAM 18901: do read
    STREAM 18901: onWriteComplete -89 undefined
    Error: ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED: Error [ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED]: Cannot call write after a stream was destroyed

    In my logs with NODE_DEBUG=stream enabled, full stacktrace at: github.com/websockets/ws/issue

  25. Does anyone know what a #libuv / #nodejs uv_write_cb status of -89 means? I'm seeing:

    STREAM 18901: do read
    STREAM 18901: onWriteComplete -89 undefined
    Error: ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED: Error [ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED]: Cannot call write after a stream was destroyed

    In my logs with NODE_DEBUG=stream enabled, full stacktrace at: github.com/websockets/ws/issue

  26. Does anyone know what a #libuv / #nodejs uv_write_cb status of -89 means? I'm seeing:

    STREAM 18901: do read
    STREAM 18901: onWriteComplete -89 undefined
    Error: ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED: Error [ERR_STREAM_DESTROYED]: Cannot call write after a stream was destroyed

    In my logs with NODE_DEBUG=stream enabled, full stacktrace at: github.com/websockets/ws/issue

  27. The biggest complaint people have about is the filesystem api is inconsistent.

    This is absolutely true, and sockets.sh completely replaces it.

    Our file system api should be instantly familiar to developers, it uses under the hood😎

  28. The biggest complaint people have about #webview is the filesystem api is inconsistent.

    This is absolutely true, and sockets.sh completely replaces it.

    Our file system api should be instantly familiar to #nodejs developers, it uses #libuv under the hood😎

  29. The biggest complaint people have about #webview is the filesystem api is inconsistent.

    This is absolutely true, and sockets.sh completely replaces it.

    Our file system api should be instantly familiar to #nodejs developers, it uses #libuv under the hood😎

  30. The biggest complaint people have about #webview is the filesystem api is inconsistent.

    This is absolutely true, and sockets.sh completely replaces it.

    Our file system api should be instantly familiar to #nodejs developers, it uses #libuv under the hood😎

  31. The biggest complaint people have about #webview is the filesystem api is inconsistent.

    This is absolutely true, and sockets.sh completely replaces it.

    Our file system api should be instantly familiar to #nodejs developers, it uses #libuv under the hood😎

  32. WOOOOOOO #cjdns finally runs for more than 30 seconds with the timer infrastructure rewritten with #Rust / #Tokio rather than #Libuv.
    😅

  33. Oh @rysiek I think you know me long enough to know I am never excited about package management :) It seriously didn't cross my mind at all when I was writing this (#npm who?:) @charlag

    #libuv ftw!

  34. WOOOOOOO #cjdns finally runs for more than 30 seconds with the timer infrastructure rewritten with #Rust / #Tokio rather than #Libuv.
    😅