#vavilov — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #vavilov, aggregated by home.social.
-
#Earth sets on April 6, 2026, over the #Moon’s curved limb in this photo captured by the #Artemis II crew during their journey around the far side of the Moon.
#Orientale basin is perched on the edge of the visible lunar surface. #Hertzsprung Basin appears as two subtle concentric rings, which are interrupted by #Vavilov, a younger #crater superimposed over the older structure.
The lines of indentations are secondary crater chains formed by ejecta from the massive impact that created Orientale.
The dark portion of Earth is experiencing nighttime.
On Earth’s day side, swirling clouds are visible over the Australia and Oceania region.
-
Spies among us? Shaun #Walker’s new book details #Russia’s decades-long international #espionage program
It could be a scene from a #thriller — watching the FBI arrest your own #parents for being #Russian #spies.
But for Alexander and Timothy #Vavilov, who had known their parents all their lives as Donald Heathfield and Tracey #Foley, it was reality.
#RussianInterference #RussianAggression #books #threats #RussianImperialism #HybridWar
-
@HygieneMentale Merci pour le partage ! Ironie toutefois, la critique du #lyssenkisme faite dans cet interview n'a pas l'air complètement honnête sur l'état des connaissances historiographiques sur le sujet depuis plus de 10 ans, je le cite :le lyssenkisme, qui, dans l’Union soviétique de #Staline, entraîna le bannissement de la génétique au nom de l’idéologie #communiste
Je n'ai pas encore vu ce qu'en dit précisément le documentaire, peut-être que les propos racontent une histoire plus honnête. Dans tous les cas je recommande très fortement le papier « Pavel Pantelimonovich Luk’ianenko and the Origins of the Soviet Green Revolution » présenté au « Second International Workshop on Lysenkoism », en 2012 ! Par l'historien #MarkTauger, étatsunien ( #WestVirginiaUniversity ) russophone, non connu pour être marxiste, et reconnu comme expert de l'histoire de l'agriculture russe.
[...]
Sur #Lyssenko, il y a peu d’archives.
[...]
#TrofimLyssenko est à part. C’est un #agronome de base qui, grâce à #Staline, arrive à dominer la biologie en #UnionSoviétique et à faire interdire la génétique jugée "bourgeoise"
Je ne cite ci-dessous que sa conclusion, mais le détail est tout aussi intéressant, notamment concernant la récente « furie anti-science » qu'est devenue la campagne pro-« Holodomor », soit-disant « génocide par la faim ukrainien » en 1932-33 (appelée « #Holodomor » uniquement d'ailleurs depuis la seconde vague de propagande mensongère issue d' #Harvard durant les années #Reagan) :[F]. Conclusions
The work of #Lukianenko and certain other grain breeders led to an explosion of research on HYVs in #Russia from the 1960s onward, as well as substantial genetics research and greatly improved education that began even before #Lysenko’s removal from power. These topics, however, lie outside the scope of this article. (109) This study of #Lukianenko challenges the prevailing view that #Lysenko held back Soviet genetics for a generation. While certainly during the heyday of #Lysenkoism, the #Soviet regime victimized many excellent #Soviet geneticists and wasted money and time on fraudulent Lysenkoists’ “research,” many other scientists conducted valid, substantial, and important work—particularly in the area of plant breeding. #Lukianenko was not the only agricultural scientist who did such research in these years, but his work had more national and international significance than that of any other #Soviet agricultural scientist in this period.
This work differed greatly from the conventional view of scientific research in the time of #Lysenko: #Lukianenko’s work began before #Lysenko’s rise and continued despite his dominance. #Lukianenko’s work relied substantially on plant varieties from outside the #USSR, in many cases brought into the #USSR through the work of #NikolaiVavilov. He also relied on conventional principles of genetics, including the guidelines for plant breeding published by #Vavilov, as well as some breeding theories and techniques from outside the #USSR. In particular he and his co-workers independently sought and achieved the same goals as the Italians around #Strampelli in the early 20th century and #Borlaug in the #GreenRevolution of the 1950s-1960s.
#Lukianenko’s work during #Lysenko’s time and afterwards produced several extremely important wheat varieties that had the same characteristics as the #GreenRevolution varieties created by #Borlaug. #Lukianenko’s Bezostaia-1, a semi-dwarf rust resistant HYV earned the highest praise from European and American breeders including #Borlaug as one of the best of the HYVs. This finding thus goes beyond even #Krementsov’s points about scientists’ evasion of #Lysenko. The work of #Lukianenko and his colleagues, more than simply continuing previous genetics-based work in plant breeding, achieved breakthroughs that put it at the forefront of world wheat breeding, both in their methods and their results. Because of the accomplishments of #Lukianenko and his co-workers in #Krasnodar, a post-Soviet Russian symposium on breeding of wheat and triticale commemorating #Lukianenko was entitled “The Green Revolution of P. P. Luk’ianenko.” (111) Thus despite #Lysenko, Soviet agronomists and #agriculture thus participated in the international #GreenRevolution under #Lysenko’s dominance as well as afterwards.
Les principaux travaux de #MarkTauger sont traduits en français depuis 2017 dans le livre « Famine et Transformation Agricole en URSS ».
#HistoireSurArchives -
@HygieneMentale Merci pour le partage ! Ironie toutefois, la critique du #lyssenkisme faite dans cet interview n'a pas l'air complètement honnête sur l'état des connaissances historiographiques sur le sujet depuis plus de 10 ans, je le cite :le lyssenkisme, qui, dans l’Union soviétique de #Staline, entraîna le bannissement de la génétique au nom de l’idéologie #communiste
Je n'ai pas encore vu ce qu'en dit précisément le documentaire, peut-être que les propos racontent une histoire plus honnête. Dans tous les cas je recommande très fortement le papier « Pavel Pantelimonovich Luk’ianenko and the Origins of the Soviet Green Revolution » présenté au « Second International Workshop on Lysenkoism », en 2012 ! Par l'historien #MarkTauger, étatsunien ( #WestVirginiaUniversity ) russophone, non connu pour être marxiste, et reconnu comme expert de l'histoire de l'agriculture russe.
[...]
Sur #Lyssenko, il y a peu d’archives.
[...]
#TrofimLyssenko est à part. C’est un #agronome de base qui, grâce à #Staline, arrive à dominer la biologie en #UnionSoviétique et à faire interdire la génétique jugée "bourgeoise"
Je ne cite ci-dessous que sa conclusion, mais le détail est tout aussi intéressant, notamment concernant la récente « furie anti-science » qu'est devenue la campagne pro-« Holodomor », soit-disant « génocide par la faim ukrainien » en 1932-33 (appelée « #Holodomor » uniquement d'ailleurs depuis la seconde vague de propagande mensongère issue d' #Harvard durant les années #Reagan) :[F]. Conclusions
The work of #Lukianenko and certain other grain breeders led to an explosion of research on HYVs in #Russia from the 1960s onward, as well as substantial genetics research and greatly improved education that began even before #Lysenko’s removal from power. These topics, however, lie outside the scope of this article. (109) This study of #Lukianenko challenges the prevailing view that #Lysenko held back Soviet genetics for a generation. While certainly during the heyday of #Lysenkoism, the #Soviet regime victimized many excellent #Soviet geneticists and wasted money and time on fraudulent Lysenkoists’ “research,” many other scientists conducted valid, substantial, and important work—particularly in the area of plant breeding. #Lukianenko was not the only agricultural scientist who did such research in these years, but his work had more national and international significance than that of any other #Soviet agricultural scientist in this period.
This work differed greatly from the conventional view of scientific research in the time of #Lysenko: #Lukianenko’s work began before #Lysenko’s rise and continued despite his dominance. #Lukianenko’s work relied substantially on plant varieties from outside the #USSR, in many cases brought into the #USSR through the work of #NikolaiVavilov. He also relied on conventional principles of genetics, including the guidelines for plant breeding published by #Vavilov, as well as some breeding theories and techniques from outside the #USSR. In particular he and his co-workers independently sought and achieved the same goals as the Italians around #Strampelli in the early 20th century and #Borlaug in the #GreenRevolution of the 1950s-1960s.
#Lukianenko’s work during #Lysenko’s time and afterwards produced several extremely important wheat varieties that had the same characteristics as the #GreenRevolution varieties created by #Borlaug. #Lukianenko’s Bezostaia-1, a semi-dwarf rust resistant HYV earned the highest praise from European and American breeders including #Borlaug as one of the best of the HYVs. This finding thus goes beyond even #Krementsov’s points about scientists’ evasion of #Lysenko. The work of #Lukianenko and his colleagues, more than simply continuing previous genetics-based work in plant breeding, achieved breakthroughs that put it at the forefront of world wheat breeding, both in their methods and their results. Because of the accomplishments of #Lukianenko and his co-workers in #Krasnodar, a post-Soviet Russian symposium on breeding of wheat and triticale commemorating #Lukianenko was entitled “The Green Revolution of P. P. Luk’ianenko.” (111) Thus despite #Lysenko, Soviet agronomists and #agriculture thus participated in the international #GreenRevolution under #Lysenko’s dominance as well as afterwards.
Les principaux travaux de #MarkTauger sont traduits en français depuis 2017 dans le livre « Famine et Transformation Agricole en URSS ».
#HistoireSurArchives -
@HygieneMentale Merci pour le partage ! Ironie toutefois, la critique du #lyssenkisme faite dans cet interview n'a pas l'air complètement honnête sur l'état des connaissances historiographiques sur le sujet depuis plus de 10 ans, je le cite :le lyssenkisme, qui, dans l’Union soviétique de #Staline, entraîna le bannissement de la génétique au nom de l’idéologie #communiste
Je n'ai pas encore vu ce qu'en dit précisément le documentaire, peut-être que les propos racontent une histoire plus honnête. Dans tous les cas je recommande très fortement le papier « Pavel Pantelimonovich Luk’ianenko and the Origins of the Soviet Green Revolution » présenté au « Second International Workshop on Lysenkoism », en 2012 ! Par l'historien #MarkTauger, étatsunien ( #WestVirginiaUniversity ) russophone, non connu pour être marxiste, et reconnu comme expert de l'histoire de l'agriculture russe.
[...]
Sur #Lyssenko, il y a peu d’archives.
[...]
#TrofimLyssenko est à part. C’est un #agronome de base qui, grâce à #Staline, arrive à dominer la biologie en #UnionSoviétique et à faire interdire la génétique jugée "bourgeoise"
Je ne cite ci-dessous que sa conclusion, mais le détail est tout aussi intéressant, notamment concernant la récente « furie anti-science » qu'est devenue la campagne pro-« Holodomor », soit-disant « génocide par la faim ukrainien » en 1932-33 (appelée « #Holodomor » uniquement d'ailleurs depuis la seconde vague de propagande mensongère issue d' #Harvard durant les années #Reagan) :[F]. Conclusions
The work of #Lukianenko and certain other grain breeders led to an explosion of research on HYVs in #Russia from the 1960s onward, as well as substantial genetics research and greatly improved education that began even before #Lysenko’s removal from power. These topics, however, lie outside the scope of this article. (109) This study of #Lukianenko challenges the prevailing view that #Lysenko held back Soviet genetics for a generation. While certainly during the heyday of #Lysenkoism, the #Soviet regime victimized many excellent #Soviet geneticists and wasted money and time on fraudulent Lysenkoists’ “research,” many other scientists conducted valid, substantial, and important work—particularly in the area of plant breeding. #Lukianenko was not the only agricultural scientist who did such research in these years, but his work had more national and international significance than that of any other #Soviet agricultural scientist in this period.
This work differed greatly from the conventional view of scientific research in the time of #Lysenko: #Lukianenko’s work began before #Lysenko’s rise and continued despite his dominance. #Lukianenko’s work relied substantially on plant varieties from outside the #USSR, in many cases brought into the #USSR through the work of #NikolaiVavilov. He also relied on conventional principles of genetics, including the guidelines for plant breeding published by #Vavilov, as well as some breeding theories and techniques from outside the #USSR. In particular he and his co-workers independently sought and achieved the same goals as the Italians around #Strampelli in the early 20th century and #Borlaug in the #GreenRevolution of the 1950s-1960s.
#Lukianenko’s work during #Lysenko’s time and afterwards produced several extremely important wheat varieties that had the same characteristics as the #GreenRevolution varieties created by #Borlaug. #Lukianenko’s Bezostaia-1, a semi-dwarf rust resistant HYV earned the highest praise from European and American breeders including #Borlaug as one of the best of the HYVs. This finding thus goes beyond even #Krementsov’s points about scientists’ evasion of #Lysenko. The work of #Lukianenko and his colleagues, more than simply continuing previous genetics-based work in plant breeding, achieved breakthroughs that put it at the forefront of world wheat breeding, both in their methods and their results. Because of the accomplishments of #Lukianenko and his co-workers in #Krasnodar, a post-Soviet Russian symposium on breeding of wheat and triticale commemorating #Lukianenko was entitled “The Green Revolution of P. P. Luk’ianenko.” (111) Thus despite #Lysenko, Soviet agronomists and #agriculture thus participated in the international #GreenRevolution under #Lysenko’s dominance as well as afterwards.
Les principaux travaux de #MarkTauger sont traduits en français depuis 2017 dans le livre « Famine et Transformation Agricole en URSS ».
#HistoireSurArchives -
@HygieneMentale Merci pour le partage ! Ironie toutefois, la critique du #lyssenkisme faite dans cet interview n'a pas l'air complètement honnête sur l'état des connaissances historiographiques sur le sujet depuis plus de 10 ans, je le cite :le lyssenkisme, qui, dans l’Union soviétique de #Staline, entraîna le bannissement de la génétique au nom de l’idéologie #communiste
Je n'ai pas encore vu ce qu'en dit précisément le documentaire, peut-être que les propos racontent une histoire plus honnête. Dans tous les cas je recommande très fortement le papier « Pavel Pantelimonovich Luk’ianenko and the Origins of the Soviet Green Revolution » présenté au « Second International Workshop on Lysenkoism », en 2012 ! Par l'historien #MarkTauger, étatsunien ( #WestVirginiaUniversity ) russophone, non connu pour être marxiste, et reconnu comme expert de l'histoire de l'agriculture russe.
[...]
Sur #Lyssenko, il y a peu d’archives.
[...]
#TrofimLyssenko est à part. C’est un #agronome de base qui, grâce à #Staline, arrive à dominer la biologie en #UnionSoviétique et à faire interdire la génétique jugée "bourgeoise"
Je ne cite ci-dessous que sa conclusion, mais le détail est tout aussi intéressant, notamment concernant la récente « furie anti-science » qu'est devenue la campagne pro-« Holodomor », soit-disant « génocide par la faim ukrainien » en 1932-33 (appelée « #Holodomor » uniquement d'ailleurs depuis la seconde vague de propagande mensongère issue d' #Harvard durant les années #Reagan) :[F]. Conclusions
The work of #Lukianenko and certain other grain breeders led to an explosion of research on HYVs in #Russia from the 1960s onward, as well as substantial genetics research and greatly improved education that began even before #Lysenko’s removal from power. These topics, however, lie outside the scope of this article. (109) This study of #Lukianenko challenges the prevailing view that #Lysenko held back Soviet genetics for a generation. While certainly during the heyday of #Lysenkoism, the #Soviet regime victimized many excellent #Soviet geneticists and wasted money and time on fraudulent Lysenkoists’ “research,” many other scientists conducted valid, substantial, and important work—particularly in the area of plant breeding. #Lukianenko was not the only agricultural scientist who did such research in these years, but his work had more national and international significance than that of any other #Soviet agricultural scientist in this period.
This work differed greatly from the conventional view of scientific research in the time of #Lysenko: #Lukianenko’s work began before #Lysenko’s rise and continued despite his dominance. #Lukianenko’s work relied substantially on plant varieties from outside the #USSR, in many cases brought into the #USSR through the work of #NikolaiVavilov. He also relied on conventional principles of genetics, including the guidelines for plant breeding published by #Vavilov, as well as some breeding theories and techniques from outside the #USSR. In particular he and his co-workers independently sought and achieved the same goals as the Italians around #Strampelli in the early 20th century and #Borlaug in the #GreenRevolution of the 1950s-1960s.
#Lukianenko’s work during #Lysenko’s time and afterwards produced several extremely important wheat varieties that had the same characteristics as the #GreenRevolution varieties created by #Borlaug. #Lukianenko’s Bezostaia-1, a semi-dwarf rust resistant HYV earned the highest praise from European and American breeders including #Borlaug as one of the best of the HYVs. This finding thus goes beyond even #Krementsov’s points about scientists’ evasion of #Lysenko. The work of #Lukianenko and his colleagues, more than simply continuing previous genetics-based work in plant breeding, achieved breakthroughs that put it at the forefront of world wheat breeding, both in their methods and their results. Because of the accomplishments of #Lukianenko and his co-workers in #Krasnodar, a post-Soviet Russian symposium on breeding of wheat and triticale commemorating #Lukianenko was entitled “The Green Revolution of P. P. Luk’ianenko.” (111) Thus despite #Lysenko, Soviet agronomists and #agriculture thus participated in the international #GreenRevolution under #Lysenko’s dominance as well as afterwards.
Les principaux travaux de #MarkTauger sont traduits en français depuis 2017 dans le livre « Famine et Transformation Agricole en URSS ».
#HistoireSurArchives -
Right now, the trio Gossamer Edge performs #Debussy #Gaubert #Lieurance and #Vavilov in #Rochester https://buff.ly/456fOqz #wch
-
In 20 minutes, the trio Gossamer Edge performs #Debussy #Gaubert #Lieurance and #Vavilov in #Rochester https://buff.ly/456fOqz #wch
-
Today, the trio Gossamer Edge performs #Debussy #Gaubert #Lieurance and #Vavilov in #Rochester https://www.worldconcerthall.com/en/schedule/the_trio_gossamer_edge_performs_debussy_gaubert_lieurance_and_vavilov_in_rochester/75713/ #wch