#rosettacode — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #rosettacode, aggregated by home.social.
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
Here you go, numerous #ATS fans, another #Mathematics #RosettaCode contribution in #ATSlang --
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Determine_if_two_triangles_overlap#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
Here you go, numerous #ATS fans, another #Mathematics #RosettaCode contribution in #ATSlang --
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Determine_if_two_triangles_overlap#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
Here you go, numerous #ATS fans, another #Mathematics #RosettaCode contribution in #ATSlang --
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Determine_if_two_triangles_overlap#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
Here you go, numerous #ATS fans, another #Mathematics #RosettaCode contribution in #ATSlang --
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Determine_if_two_triangles_overlap#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
Here you go, numerous #ATS fans, another #Mathematics #RosettaCode contribution in #ATSlang --
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Determine_if_two_triangles_overlap#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --
Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a_point_is_within_a_triangle#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --
Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a_point_is_within_a_triangle#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --
Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a_point_is_within_a_triangle#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --
Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a_point_is_within_a_triangle#ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --
Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a_point_is_within_a_triangle#ATS
-
So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.
Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?
-
So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.
Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?
-
So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.
Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?
-
So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.
Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?
-
So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.
Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?
-
CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task
Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:
Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zier_curves/Intersections
-
CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task
Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:
Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zier_curves/Intersections
-
CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task
Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:
Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zier_curves/Intersections
-
CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task
Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:
Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zier_curves/Intersections
-
CW: New Rosetta Code task
I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:
Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffensen%27s_method
Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.
cc: @khaled
-
CW: New Rosetta Code task
I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:
Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffensen%27s_method
Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.
cc: @khaled
-
CW: New Rosetta Code task
I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:
Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffensen%27s_method
Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.
cc: @khaled
-
CW: New Rosetta Code task
I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:
Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffensen%27s_method
Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.
cc: @khaled
-
Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.
-
Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.
-
Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.
-
Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.
-
CW: Rosetta Code/ATS
There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.
-
CW: Rosetta Code
Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --
Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator#Extra_%22credit%22
-
CW: Rosetta Code
Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --
Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator#Extra_%22credit%22
-
CW: Rosetta Code
Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --
Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator#Extra_%22credit%22
-
CW: Rosetta Code
Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --
Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator#Extra_%22credit%22
-
CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!
Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Data_analysis(I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)
-
CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!
Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Data_analysis(I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)
-
CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!
Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Data_analysis(I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)
-
CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!
Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Data_analysis(I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)
-
CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!
Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Simulator
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated_optics_experiment/Data_analysis(I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)
-
CW: Rosetta Code: NEW TASK!!!!!!!!!
I just added a task to #RosettaCode, so have at it!
Bernstein basis polynomials - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Bernstein_basis_polynomials
-
CW: Rosetta Code: NEW TASK!!!!!!!!!
I just added a task to #RosettaCode, so have at it!
Bernstein basis polynomials - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Bernstein_basis_polynomials
-
CW: Rosetta Code: NEW TASK!!!!!!!!!
I just added a task to #RosettaCode, so have at it!
Bernstein basis polynomials - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Bernstein_basis_polynomials
-
CW: Rosetta Code: NEW TASK!!!!!!!!!
I just added a task to #RosettaCode, so have at it!
Bernstein basis polynomials - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Bernstein_basis_polynomials
-
CW: Rosetta Code: NEW TASK!!!!!!!!!
I just added a task to #RosettaCode, so have at it!
Bernstein basis polynomials - Rosetta Code https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Bernstein_basis_polynomials
-
Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.
There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.
And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????
-
Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.
There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.
And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????
-
Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.
There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.
And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????
-
Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.
There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.
And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
Some naïve quadrature implementations, in #ATS, for #RosettaCode --
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
Some naïve quadrature implementations, in #ATS, for #RosettaCode --
-
CW: Rosetta Code and ATS
Some naïve quadrature implementations, in #ATS, for #RosettaCode --