home.social

#rosettacode — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #rosettacode, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. CW: Rosetta Code and ATS

    A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --

    Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a

    #ATSlang #Mathematics #Geometry

  2. CW: Rosetta Code and ATS

    A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --

    Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a

    #ATSlang #Mathematics #Geometry

  3. CW: Rosetta Code and ATS

    A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --

    Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a

    #ATSlang #Mathematics #Geometry

  4. CW: Rosetta Code and ATS

    A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --

    Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a

    #ATSlang #Mathematics #Geometry

  5. CW: Rosetta Code and ATS

    A #RosettaCode contribution for #ATS -- the old insideness of a convex hull algorithm. I decided to do this because I am likely to stick the algorithm within my next Bézier intersection algorithm (which will be coded in Ada using homogeneous geometric algebra, not in ATS using euclidean, but whatever) --

    Find if a point is within a triangle - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_if_a

    #ATSlang #Mathematics #Geometry

  6. So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.

    Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?

  7. So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.

    Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?

  8. So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.

    Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?

  9. So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.

    Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?

  10. So it turns out that #Miraheze, the #wikifarm I migrated #RosettaCode to, is shutting down. I really don't have the time to operate RC any more, or to invest in it, and I'm looking for options.

    Anyone have good recommendations? Maybe the #Wikimedia foundation could take it on?

  11. CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task

    Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:

    Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zi

    #ATS #ATSlang #Dlang #Maxima

  12. CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task

    Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:

    Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zi

    #ATS #ATSlang #Dlang #Maxima

  13. CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task

    Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:

    Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zi

    #ATS #ATSlang #Dlang #Maxima

  14. CW: Rosetta Code Bézier intersections task

    Have at it, #fonts nerds and #graphics weirdos! A #RosettaCode task for y’all:

    Bézier curves/Intersections - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zi

    #ATS #ATSlang #Dlang #Maxima

  15. CW: New Rosetta Code task

    I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:

    Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffense

    Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.

    cc: @khaled

  16. CW: New Rosetta Code task

    I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:

    Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffense

    Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.

    cc: @khaled

  17. CW: New Rosetta Code task

    I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:

    Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffense

    Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.

    cc: @khaled

  18. CW: New Rosetta Code task

    I wrote a new #RosettaCode task of interest to both #ATS fans and #fonts fans:

    Steffensen's method - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Steffense

    Incidentally, before being smart and using #MetaPost for the graphic (the only SW I should have considered, aside from #Asymptote), I tried using the software formerly known as FF, but which did nothing but crash. I mean, really, it did nothing but crash. FontCrash, it will be called.

    cc: @khaled

  19. Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.

  20. Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.

  21. Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.

  22. Well, I am not eager to contribute to #RosettaCode on a language that is SUCH A moving target.

  23. CW: Rosetta Code/ATS

    There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.

  24. CW: Rosetta Code/ATS

    There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.

  25. CW: Rosetta Code/ATS

    There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.

  26. CW: Rosetta Code/ATS

    There is a new #ATS example at #RosettaCode, part of my nascent tendentious series of simulations that show quantum physicists are entirely wrong in some of their beliefs:

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    This #ATSlang code is all or mostly free of the proofs and complicated call by reference you often see in my ATS code. You could translate it straight into OCaml or SML. It is a simulation, supposedly impossible, of experiments you sometimes see hyped in the news, but which are stupid.

  27. CW: Rosetta Code

    Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --

    Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

  28. CW: Rosetta Code

    Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --

    Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

  29. CW: Rosetta Code

    Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --

    Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

  30. CW: Rosetta Code

    Please have a look at my "Extra Credit" problem on #RosettaCode --

    Simulated optics experiment/Simulator - Rosetta Code rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

  31. CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!

    Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated
    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    (I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)

  32. CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!

    Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated
    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    (I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)

  33. CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!

    Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated
    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    (I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)

  34. CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!

    Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated
    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    (I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)

  35. CW: Rosetta Code: Two new tasks, BY ME!

    Have at it, fellow computer programming #RosettaCode nerds! I have done the #Python (not because I like Python, which I do not, but because so many others know it):

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated
    rosettacode.org/wiki/Simulated

    (I do admit, however, that the library support was quite adequate, for doing a simulation such as this with multiple processes. Most languages, certainly, do not come with such support as part of their compiler/interpreter distribution.)

  36. Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.

    There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.

    And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Active_ob

    #ATSlang

  37. Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.

    There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.

    And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Active_ob

    #ATSlang

  38. Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.

    There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.

    And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Active_ob

    #ATSlang

  39. Some #RealTime #ObjectOriented programming in #ATS for #RosettaCode. And I mean really #OO, not type hierarchy masquerading as OO. Communicating objects.

    There is no type hierarchy, because none is needed. One can use a closure to connect two objects, as long as the connection is compatible at both ends.

    And there is just one thread, because why in heck would you need two threads, just to read the time on the clock??????

    rosettacode.org/wiki/Active_ob

    #ATSlang