home.social

#radiocarbon — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #radiocarbon, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Early medieval cemetery at Germany’s Altenberge Church confirmed by radiocarbon dating

    Scientific testing has confirmed that graves uncovered beside St. John the Baptist Church in Altenberge, Germany, date to…
    #Germany #DE #Europe #EU #Europa #Ancientchurches #Christianity #Medieval #Radiocarbon
    europesays.com/germany/63478/

  2. I finally got round to adding classic single radiocarbon calibration plots to my #Rstats package {c14}. I think they turned out pretty nice!

    c14.joeroe.io/reference/plot.c

    #Archaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Radiocarbon

  3. I finally got round to adding classic single radiocarbon calibration plots to my #Rstats package {c14}. I think they turned out pretty nice!

    c14.joeroe.io/reference/plot.c

    #Archaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Radiocarbon

  4. I finally got round to adding classic single radiocarbon calibration plots to my #Rstats package {c14}. I think they turned out pretty nice!

    c14.joeroe.io/reference/plot.c

    #Archaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Radiocarbon

  5. I finally got round to adding classic single radiocarbon calibration plots to my #Rstats package {c14}. I think they turned out pretty nice!

    c14.joeroe.io/reference/plot.c

    #Archaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Radiocarbon

  6. I finally got round to adding classic single radiocarbon calibration plots to my #Rstats package {c14}. I think they turned out pretty nice!

    c14.joeroe.io/reference/plot.c

    #Archaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Radiocarbon

  7. A coca leaf buried with a sacrificed Inca child just narrowed a 90-year mystery to under 50. New radiocarbon work points to ~1499 CE, the reign of Huayna Capac, not conquest, but imperial maintenance. #IncaEmpire #Archaeology #Radiocarbon anthropology.net/p/a-coca-leaf

  8. A coca leaf buried with a sacrificed Inca child just narrowed a 90-year mystery to under 50. New radiocarbon work points to ~1499 CE, the reign of Huayna Capac, not conquest, but imperial maintenance. #IncaEmpire #Archaeology #Radiocarbon anthropology.net/p/a-coca-leaf

  9. A coca leaf buried with a sacrificed Inca child just narrowed a 90-year mystery to under 50. New radiocarbon work points to ~1499 CE, the reign of Huayna Capac, not conquest, but imperial maintenance. #IncaEmpire #Archaeology #Radiocarbon anthropology.net/p/a-coca-leaf

  10. A coca leaf buried with a sacrificed Inca child just narrowed a 90-year mystery to under 50. New radiocarbon work points to ~1499 CE, the reign of Huayna Capac, not conquest, but imperial maintenance. #IncaEmpire #Archaeology #Radiocarbon anthropology.net/p/a-coca-leaf

  11. A coca leaf buried with a sacrificed Inca child just narrowed a 90-year mystery to under 50. New radiocarbon work points to ~1499 CE, the reign of Huayna Capac, not conquest, but imperial maintenance. #IncaEmpire #Archaeology #Radiocarbon anthropology.net/p/a-coca-leaf

  12. 14,400 years ago, five people and a canid entered an Italian cave using pine twigs for light

    A new investigation of Bàsura Cave in northwestern Italy has provided fresh evidence about how Late Upper Paleolithic…
    #Italy #Europe #Europa #EU #Archaeobotany #Hunter-gatherers #IceAge #Paleolithic #Radiocarbon
    europesays.com/italy/22695/

  13. Rare Adena-era stone tool cache discovered beneath Ohio golf course deepens archaeological mystery

    A chance find on an Ohio golf course has left archaeologists with an unusual puzzle. The collection, known…
    #Golf #News #NorthAmerica #Radiocarbon #StoneTools #X-rayAnalysis
    europesays.com/golf/16812/

  14. RE: archaeo.social/@isakroa/109382

    Came across this formulation in a fairly recent paper: "Formation of the site ended between cal AD 1325 and 1410 (note 68% CI dates are considered more probable)", in which they otherwise treat their dates very conscientiously, so I'm quote-boosting this old thread. This is problematic, right?
    #radiocarbon

  15. RE: archaeo.social/@isakroa/109382

    Came across this formulation in a fairly recent paper: "Formation of the site ended between cal AD 1325 and 1410 (note 68% CI dates are considered more probable)", in which they otherwise treat their dates very conscientiously, so I'm quote-boosting this old thread. This is problematic, right?
    #radiocarbon

  16. RE: archaeo.social/@isakroa/109382

    Came across this formulation in a fairly recent paper: "Formation of the site ended between cal AD 1325 and 1410 (note 68% CI dates are considered more probable)", in which they otherwise treat their dates very conscientiously, so I'm quote-boosting this old thread. This is problematic, right?
    #radiocarbon

  17. RE: archaeo.social/@isakroa/109382

    Came across this formulation in a fairly recent paper: "Formation of the site ended between cal AD 1325 and 1410 (note 68% CI dates are considered more probable)", in which they otherwise treat their dates very conscientiously, so I'm quote-boosting this old thread. This is problematic, right?
    #radiocarbon

  18. IOSACal 0.7

    IOSACal 0.7 was released yesterday. Here is a quick summary of what’s new. One of the standard plots rendered in the latest IOSACal version. It looks exactly as before. This long cycle was mostly about documentation improvements and some maintenance tasks, the boring but essential work that keeps the project going. Version 0.7 is already available in PyPI and conda-forge. There is an updated version record at Zenodo. All changes were contributed by Stefano Costa. Documentation […]

    steko.iosa.it/2026/02/16/iosac

  19. IOSACal 0.7

    IOSACal 0.7 was released yesterday. Here is a quick summary of what’s new. One of the standard plots rendered in the latest IOSACal version. It looks exactly as before. This long cycle was mostly about documentation improvements and some maintenance tasks, the boring but essential work that keeps the project going. Version 0.7 is already available in PyPI and conda-forge. There is an updated version record at Zenodo. All changes were contributed by Stefano Costa. Documentation […]

    steko.iosa.it/2026/02/16/iosac

  20. IOSACal 0.7

    IOSACal 0.7 was released yesterday. Here is a quick summary of what’s new. One of the standard plots rendered in the latest IOSACal version. It looks exactly as before. This long cycle was mostly about documentation improvements and some maintenance tasks, the boring but essential work that keeps the project going. Version 0.7 is already available in PyPI and conda-forge. There is an updated version record at Zenodo. All changes were contributed by Stefano Costa. Documentation […]

    steko.iosa.it/2026/02/16/iosac

  21. IOSACal 0.7

    IOSACal 0.7 was released yesterday. Here is a quick summary of what’s new. One of the standard plots rendered in the latest IOSACal version. It looks exactly as before. This long cycle was mostly about documentation improvements and some maintenance tasks, the boring but essential work that keeps the project going. Version 0.7 is already available in PyPI and conda-forge. There is an updated version record at Zenodo. All changes were contributed by Stefano Costa. Documentation […]

    steko.iosa.it/2026/02/16/iosac

  22. IOSACal 0.7

    IOSACal 0.7 was released yesterday. Here is a quick summary of what’s new. One of the standard plots rendered in the latest IOSACal version. It looks exactly as before. This long cycle was mostly about documentation improvements and some maintenance tasks, the boring but essential work that keeps the project going. Version 0.7 is already available in PyPI and conda-forge. There is an updated version record at Zenodo. All changes were contributed by Stefano Costa. Documentation […]

    steko.iosa.it/2026/02/16/iosac

  23. @jens2go @ClemensSchmid Unfortunately I have to agree with the reviewers (cool that these are open!) that the chronological modelling in this paper does not support the claims it makes.

    In particular, the headline that the structures were "used for up to 429 years" conflates the uncertainty of the #radiocarbon dates with the occupation span of the site.

    In reality the radiocarbon data offers no evidence of long-lived occupation (and hence domesticity); it just doesn't rule it out.

  24. @jens2go @ClemensSchmid Unfortunately I have to agree with the reviewers (cool that these are open!) that the chronological modelling in this paper does not support the claims it makes.

    In particular, the headline that the structures were "used for up to 429 years" conflates the uncertainty of the #radiocarbon dates with the occupation span of the site.

    In reality the radiocarbon data offers no evidence of long-lived occupation (and hence domesticity); it just doesn't rule it out.

  25. @jens2go @ClemensSchmid Unfortunately I have to agree with the reviewers (cool that these are open!) that the chronological modelling in this paper does not support the claims it makes.

    In particular, the headline that the structures were "used for up to 429 years" conflates the uncertainty of the #radiocarbon dates with the occupation span of the site.

    In reality the radiocarbon data offers no evidence of long-lived occupation (and hence domesticity); it just doesn't rule it out.

  26. @jens2go @ClemensSchmid Unfortunately I have to agree with the reviewers (cool that these are open!) that the chronological modelling in this paper does not support the claims it makes.

    In particular, the headline that the structures were "used for up to 429 years" conflates the uncertainty of the #radiocarbon dates with the occupation span of the site.

    In reality the radiocarbon data offers no evidence of long-lived occupation (and hence domesticity); it just doesn't rule it out.

  27. @jens2go @ClemensSchmid Unfortunately I have to agree with the reviewers (cool that these are open!) that the chronological modelling in this paper does not support the claims it makes.

    In particular, the headline that the structures were "used for up to 429 years" conflates the uncertainty of the #radiocarbon dates with the occupation span of the site.

    In reality the radiocarbon data offers no evidence of long-lived occupation (and hence domesticity); it just doesn't rule it out.

  28. New research refines marine radiocarbon corrections for Magdalenian Spain, showing that different shell species age differently. The result is a sharper timeline for coastal Ice Age life and cave occupations. #Radiocarbon #Paleolithic #Archaeology #HumanEvolution anthropology.net/p/when-shellf

  29. New research refines marine radiocarbon corrections for Magdalenian Spain, showing that different shell species age differently. The result is a sharper timeline for coastal Ice Age life and cave occupations. #Radiocarbon #Paleolithic #Archaeology #HumanEvolution anthropology.net/p/when-shellf

  30. New research refines marine radiocarbon corrections for Magdalenian Spain, showing that different shell species age differently. The result is a sharper timeline for coastal Ice Age life and cave occupations. #Radiocarbon #Paleolithic #Archaeology #HumanEvolution anthropology.net/p/when-shellf

  31. New research refines marine radiocarbon corrections for Magdalenian Spain, showing that different shell species age differently. The result is a sharper timeline for coastal Ice Age life and cave occupations. #Radiocarbon #Paleolithic #Archaeology #HumanEvolution anthropology.net/p/when-shellf

  32. New research refines marine radiocarbon corrections for Magdalenian Spain, showing that different shell species age differently. The result is a sharper timeline for coastal Ice Age life and cave occupations. #Radiocarbon #Paleolithic #Archaeology #HumanEvolution anthropology.net/p/when-shellf

  33. I'm starting #DigiArchMaintainathon today, working further with @jfy133 and @ddj-sa.bsky.social on a new standard for reporting #radiocarbon dates: github.com/MIxS-MInAS/miaard/

  34. I'm starting #DigiArchMaintainathon today, working further with @jfy133 and @ddj-sa.bsky.social on a new standard for reporting #radiocarbon dates: github.com/MIxS-MInAS/miaard/

  35. I'm starting #DigiArchMaintainathon today, working further with @jfy133 and @ddj-sa.bsky.social on a new standard for reporting #radiocarbon dates: github.com/MIxS-MInAS/miaard/

  36. I'm starting #DigiArchMaintainathon today, working further with @jfy133 and @ddj-sa.bsky.social on a new standard for reporting #radiocarbon dates: github.com/MIxS-MInAS/miaard/

  37. I'm starting #DigiArchMaintainathon today, working further with @jfy133 and @ddj-sa.bsky.social on a new standard for reporting #radiocarbon dates: github.com/MIxS-MInAS/miaard/

  38. Making my way from Copenhagen to Leipzig for a workshop on #radiocarbon data and metadata organised by @jfy133. I'm looking forward to the workshop but---strangely maybe moreso---10 hours of focused time on the train.

    I unfortunately haven't done so much solo #CrossBorderRail this year. It's either been by plane (ugh) or long train trips with young kids... which is also fun, but not in the same way!

  39. Making my way from Copenhagen to Leipzig for a workshop on #radiocarbon data and metadata organised by @jfy133. I'm looking forward to the workshop but---strangely maybe moreso---10 hours of focused time on the train.

    I unfortunately haven't done so much solo #CrossBorderRail this year. It's either been by plane (ugh) or long train trips with young kids... which is also fun, but not in the same way!

  40. Making my way from Copenhagen to Leipzig for a workshop on #radiocarbon data and metadata organised by @jfy133. I'm looking forward to the workshop but---strangely maybe moreso---10 hours of focused time on the train.

    I unfortunately haven't done so much solo #CrossBorderRail this year. It's either been by plane (ugh) or long train trips with young kids... which is also fun, but not in the same way!