#ndpleadership — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #ndpleadership, aggregated by home.social.
-
CW: canadian politics
congratulations @avilewis!
huge challenges ahead but also very hopeful for the revitalization
-
Niall Ricardo, Libby Davies, and Keira Gunn ran as a slate of candidates with a pitch to empower the NDP’s electoral district associations. #canpoli #ndpleadership #ndp
-
Ooh so that’s neat, the #NDP leadership voting system is ranked voting. has it always been that way? how well do you think it works?
-
NDP members of all age groups support Tony. Here's why three of them think Tony is the Leader for these times. #ndp #ndpleadership #ndp2026
-
J'ai voté pour @avilewis comme chef du #NPD #NDP! C'est un candidat dynamique qui communique bien et qui a un charisme qui devrait rejoindre le plus de #canadiens et donner une chance au parti d'aller chercher plus de sièges au #parlement.
Bonne chance Avi! J'espère que tu vas gagner!
#canpol #canpoli #polcanada #polcan #NDPLeadership #npd2026 #ndp2026 -
J'ai voté pour @avilewis comme chef du #NPD #NDP! C'est un candidat dynamique qui communique bien et qui a un charisme qui devrait rejoindre le plus de #canadiens et donner une chance au parti d'aller chercher plus de sièges au #parlement.
Bonne chance Avi! J'espère que tu vas gagner!
#canpol #canpoli #polcanada #polcan #NDPLeadership #npd2026 #ndp2026 -
J'ai voté pour @avilewis comme chef du #NPD #NDP! C'est un candidat dynamique qui communique bien et qui a un charisme qui devrait rejoindre le plus de #canadiens et donner une chance au parti d'aller chercher plus de sièges au #parlement.
Bonne chance Avi! J'espère que tu vas gagner!
#canpol #canpoli #polcanada #polcan #NDPLeadership #npd2026 #ndp2026 -
I see media and Alberta NDP people criticizing Avi Lewis for his advocacy of the Leap Manifesto a decade ago.
The 2015 Leap Manifesto called for :
*A shift to a "100% clean energy economy" by 2050.
*An end to gov subsidies to the fossil fuel industry
*Support for community-owned clean energy projects
*A universal program for retrofitting, prioritizing low income communities
*Re-training for workers in carbon-intensive industries
*Localization of agriculture infrastructure
*A moratorium on international trade deals that infringe upon democratic rights
*A debate on universal basic income
*An end to corporate funding of political campaigns and examination of voting reform.Scary stuff, huh. #NDP #NDPleadership
-
This movement has truly been built from the ground up. As we go into the final stretch, we’d appreciate your vote and your donation to help fuel our people-powered movement.
Thank you for your support.
#cdnpoli #ndp #canada #canada_gram #ndpleadership #green #socialism -
Well, for any NDPers in Ontario who are considering working class dude Rob Ashton for leader, he's having a virtual town hall on Saturday.
https://actionnetwork.org/events/rob-ashton-ontario-virtual-townhall
-
I just voted for @avilewis for leader of Canada's NDP. He's the furthest left of the candidates, he has a long track record, and he's a good speaker.
The other ones with a chance are both PRO PIPELINE. Which is wild. So don't give them any of your votes unless you love pipelines. #ndp #ndpleadership #canada #canpoli #covidIsNotOver #bcpoli #climatecrisis
-
J'ai voté dans la course à la direction du NPD fédéral ☑️
-
J'ai voté dans la course à la direction du NPD fédéral ☑️
-
J'ai voté dans la course à la direction du NPD fédéral ☑️
-
J'ai voté dans la course à la direction du NPD fédéral ☑️
-
J'ai voté dans la course à la direction du NPD fédéral ☑️
-
CW: canadian politics, NDP
RE: https://mstdn.ca/@avilewis/116144555353283303
fantastic statement from Avi Lewis about transnational repression from authoritarian governments, and the need for the NDP to stand up to it. really good framing
-
CW: canadian politics, NDP leadership race, alberta NDP
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@cxiao/116140922602989098
I also think that the Alberta NDP has been great in consistently standing up for trans rights, and it's not a new stance for them at all; I remember very clearly them standing completely firm on students' rights to live as their gender identity in school (as well as on students' rights to form gay-straight alliance groups at school), all the way back in 2016 when they were in government: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-education-gender-lgbtq-gsa-guidelines-1.3402300
I genuinely wish some of the federal NDP leadership candidates were better at highlighting the good work that the Alberta NDP did, during the years when they were in government. They were able to take some very important steps towards economic diversification and climate protection and workers rights, while standing firm on protecting LGBTQ people, all during a really bad recession. Even McPherson from Alberta doesn't spotlight the work enough, I think.
I think one of the most important things for the federal NDP leader, whoever wins, is to make sure that the relationship with the Alberta NDP is good, and to make sure that they win the provincial election next year. It's not just important for Alberta, but for all of Canada who cares about trans rights, protecting healthcare, labour rights, decarbonization, judicial independence, immigrants rights, etc. etc. Every one of these is an NDP value. The Alberta government is pushing to the extreme right in all these directions and is trying to import MAGA-style policies for tearing down all of these things, to Canada, and the speed at which they are doing it is devastating. It's not just an Alberta thing, it should concern all of us.
-
CW: polcan, chefferie du NPD
RE: https://mastodon.quebec/@radiocanada/116121894348459646
À la question de savoir quand il compte annoncer sa décision, M. Boulerice a indiqué qu’il va attendre la fin de la course à la chefferie du NPD, prévue à la fin mars. « C’est ça, la priorité pour moi en ce moment », a-t-il dit. « On se reparlera ensuite. »
boulerice n'a soutenu aucun candidat pour la chefferie du NPD. pourquoi, ou pour qui, attend-il?
-
CW: canadian politics, unions, ndp
RE: https://mastodon.online/@pressprogress/116132510148689046
really good read about an employer-friendly union that's quite active in western canada
(Interesting too because the "Christian" in the union name isn't really from modern evangelical christianity as people may expect)
Relevant as well to the #NDP / #ndpleadership; as mentioned in the article Heather McPherson introduced a bill specifically against CLAC and similar company unions
-
The US Democratic Party will pick a new head on February 1, 2025, while the Canadian NDP votes in late March. This is important because the NDP now has only 7 seats in Parliament, which is much lower than in the past.
#dncvote2025, #ndpleadership, #nycmayor2025, #canadapolitics, #uspolitics
https://newsletter.tf/how-us-democrats-and-canadian-ndp-choose-new-leaders-2025/
-
NDP Leadership Candidates Hold Final Debate
NDP leadership candidates debated in New Westminster on Thursday evening. Voting starts March 9. Learn about the candidates and how to watch.
#NDPLeadership, #NewDemocats, #NDPDebate, #CanadianPolitics, #NewWestminster
https://newsletter.tf/ndp-leadership-candidates-final-debate-new-westminster-thursday/
-
NDP Leadership Candidates Hold Final Debate
NDP leadership candidates debated in New Westminster on Thursday evening. Voting starts March 9. Learn about the candidates and how to watch.
#NDPLeadership, #NewDemocats, #NDPDebate, #CanadianPolitics, #NewWestminster
https://newsletter.tf/ndp-leadership-candidates-final-debate-new-westminster-thursday/
-
Five NDP leadership candidates met for their final debate in New Westminster on Thursday evening. Voting for the new leader begins March 9.
#NDPLeadership, #NewDemocats, #NDPDebate, #CanadianPolitics, #NewWestminster
https://newsletter.tf/ndp-leadership-candidates-final-debate-new-westminster-thursday/
-
CW: canadian politics, ndp leadership debate, union busting allegation against avi lewis
I ended up watching some of the Q&A after the NDP leadership debate. Interestingly, @avilewis was asked about an allegation which I hadn't heard before: that he obstructed and undermined the employee union at The Leap, the climate advocacy organization which he co-founded.
(edit: He is asked about it at 2:01:16 in the CPAC video of the debate and subsequent Q&A, it's the question from David Thurton at the CBC)
I found the reporting which was the source of the allegation: https://provincialtimes.ca/exclusive-did-an-ndp-leadership-candidate-bust-his-own-workers-union/
The main facts stated are:
1) Workers at The Leap obtained certification for a union in June 2020. (https://theleap.org/the-leap-workers-vote-to-join-cupe/)
2) Despite the union being certified, no progress on bargaining or reaching a collective agreement with the union ever occurred, for 9 months.
3) In March 2021, The Leap shut down. One of the cited reasons was the departure of Lewis. (https://theleap.org/closing-statement/)
4) In March 2021, 6 days after The Leap shut down, The Breach, a progressive news organization, launched.
5) Lewis would go on to become a prominent contributor to The Breach.
6) Notably, The Breach to this day remains a non-unionized newsroom.The main allegation is that Lewis took part in "union avoidance", specifically "an employer delaying bargaining until an organization closes, only to re-emerge in a non-union form."
In light of my reading I wasn't impressed with Lewis' answer, because he only pointed to the initial certification of the union in June, and never addressed the substance of the allegation: that he and other management deliberately delayed any progress towards an actual collective agreement before the organization shut down. I think that anyone who purports to care about unionization should be familiar with the "don't give anything substantive to the union, stall until the business shuts down" tactic that employers use. It's kind of 101 level union avoidance stuff.
I also have a very low opinion of The Breach as a newsroom, because they have a recurring pattern of publishing pieces that are indistinguishable from Russian and Chinese propaganda. For example, these articles that are basically bottom of the barrel scraping, lurid personal attacks on Chrystia Freeland, which use a line of attack ("her grandfather was a nazi!!1!!1") that is completely the same as what Russian state media says:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250922055414/https://breachmedia.ca/chrystia-freelands-denials-grandfather-complicit-nazi-genocide/
https://web.archive.org/web/20250821034722/https://breachmedia.ca/foreign-policy-without-diplomacy-will-be-freelands-legacy/Or these articles that try as hard as they possibly can using scraps of circumstantial evidence to deny that Chinese interference in Canadian politics took place, while very conveniently ignoring the Chinese diaspora who have actual first-hand experience with PRC transnational repression and interference:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250611194539/https://breachmedia.ca/no-traitors-cost-of-baseless-reporting-chinese-interference/
https://web.archive.org/web/20250828165825/https://breachmedia.ca/china-interference-canada/(I left an angry comment on the first article lmao)
Edit: Just noticed another article by The Breach which brings up really good concerns about Poilievre's hypocrisy in helping his uncle-in-law's asylum application while advocating against asylum seeker. The thing is though: They then completely taint the reporting by implying that his uncle-in-law was lying about his reasons for seeking asylum (detention without trial for making allegations about corruption in the Venezuelan government), by uncritically accepting the Venezuelan government prosecution's narrative. That's ignorant and disgusting; casting this kind of aspersion on asylum seeker cases from authoritarian countries, hurts all asylum seekers. It's the complete opposite of solidarity.
The Breach is aware of the existence of transnational repression and foreign propaganda - they've done great reporting on the role of the Hindutva movement / BJP in Canada - so the fact that they would publish this other garbage is even more damning. And to be honest, Lewis' involvement with The Breach, and The Breach's endorsement of Lewis, is kind of an anti-endorsement for me.
However, despite my doubt in Lewis' answer, and my disdain for The Breach, I think the allegations fall apart on one point: That The Breach was a direct succession organization to The Leap. The organizations had different purposes, and the same people were not involved in founding The Breach as the ones which departed The Leap. The facts of the allegation that I've listed above are correct as far as I can tell, but the rest of the reporting and the conclusions it drew are suspect (basically the same level of journalistic malpractice as The Breach's terrible articles above).
tl;dr I think my main point is just Don't Read The Breach. To put it politely, they are using the guise of being a leftist publication to sneak in pieces that are very much defending authoritarianism
-
Listening to the ndp leadership debate tonight and repeat a previous statement: i hope regardless of who wins, all these cadidates remain as mp cadidates, and possible (shadow) cabinet options. These all resonate with me for different reasons.
I would say collective leadership would be ideal, but i dont see that happening.
-
Listening to the ndp leadership debate tonight and repeat a previous statement: i hope regardless of who wins, all these cadidates remain as mp cadidates, and possible (shadow) cabinet options. These all resonate with me for different reasons.
I would say collective leadership would be ideal, but i dont see that happening.
-
Listening to the ndp leadership debate tonight and repeat a previous statement: i hope regardless of who wins, all these cadidates remain as mp cadidates, and possible (shadow) cabinet options. These all resonate with me for different reasons.
I would say collective leadership would be ideal, but i dont see that happening.
-
Listening to the ndp leadership debate tonight and repeat a previous statement: i hope regardless of who wins, all these cadidates remain as mp cadidates, and possible (shadow) cabinet options. These all resonate with me for different reasons.
I would say collective leadership would be ideal, but i dont see that happening.