home.social
Sign in Create account

#legalexperts — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #legalexperts, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The Bad Place @[email protected] ·

    yahoo news | Melania Trump's emails released with Epstein files resurface after she makes...

    Melania Trump’s personal email archive has been made public, revealing a trove of messages that intersect with the Jeffrey Epstein case. The release came shortly after the former first lady delivered a stark warning at the White House, demanding that Congress hold hearings to examine the files that survivors say could shed new light on Epstein’s network. In her speech, Melania urged lawmakers to “bring every piece of evidence to light” and to give victims a platform to be heard, positioning the email dump as a crucial step toward that goal.

    The newly released emails include correspondence between Melania and members of the Trump inner circle, as well as communications with attorneys and investigators handling the Epstein investigation. Among the disclosed messages are references to meetings scheduled with key figures linked to the 2016‑2020 period, requests for clarification on financial transactions tied to Epstein’s offshore accounts, and internal discussions about the potential legal ramifications of the scandal. The documents suggest that Melania was aware of, and at times directly involved in, efforts to manage the narrative surrounding the late financier’s alleged crimes.

    Reactions to the leak have been swift and polarized. Democratic leaders have praised the former first lady’s push for transparency, calling the emails “potentially explosive” evidence that could support ongoing lawsuits filed by Epstein’s victims. Republican officials, meanwhile, have dismissed the release as a politically motivated “media stunt,” arguing that the content offers little new insight beyond what investigators already possess. Legal experts note that while the emails may not constitute fresh prosecutorial evidence, they could influence public opinion and pressure legislative bodies to act on the longstanding calls for a comprehensive inquiry into the Epstein affair.

    Read more: unilad.com/news/us-news/melani

    #melaniatrump #jeffreyepstein #whitehouse #trump #legalexperts

    #melaniatrump #jeffreyepstein #whitehouse #trump #legalexperts
  2. DrWeb @[email protected] ·

    UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

    Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

    Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
    Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

    This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

    This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

    Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

    Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

    Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

    The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

    Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

    Summary

    The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

    The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

    Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

    This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

    MLA Bibliography

    Tags: 2025, Bibliography, Constitutional Duty, Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders, Gemini, Gemini AI, Google Gemini, International laws, Legal Experts, Military Judges, MLA, U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, UCMJ, UCMJ Article 90, UCMJ Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice

    #2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

    #bibliography #constitutionalduty #dutytodisobeyillegalorders #gemini #geminiai #googlegemini
  3. DrWeb @[email protected] ·

    UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

    Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

    Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
    Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

    This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

    This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

    Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

    Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

    Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

    The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

    Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

    Summary

    The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

    The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

    Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

    This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

    MLA Bibliography

    Tags: 2025, Bibliography, Constitutional Duty, Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders, Gemini, Gemini AI, Google Gemini, International laws, Legal Experts, Military Judges, MLA, U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, UCMJ, UCMJ Article 90, UCMJ Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice

    #2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

    #bibliography #constitutionalduty #dutytodisobeyillegalorders #gemini #geminiai #googlegemini
  4. DrWeb @[email protected] ·

    UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

    Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

    Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
    Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

    This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

    This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

    Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

    Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

    Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

    The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

    Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

    Summary

    The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

    The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

    Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

    This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

    MLA Bibliography

    Tags: 2025, Bibliography, Constitutional Duty, Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders, Gemini, Gemini AI, Google Gemini, International laws, Legal Experts, Military Judges, MLA, U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, UCMJ, UCMJ Article 90, UCMJ Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice

    #2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

    #bibliography #constitutionalduty #dutytodisobeyillegalorders #gemini #geminiai #googlegemini
  5. DrWeb @[email protected] ·

    UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

    Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed.

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

    Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
    Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

    This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

    This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

    Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

    Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

    Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

    The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

    Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

    Summary

    The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

    The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

    Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

    This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

    MLA Bibliography

    #2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

    #uniformcodeofmilitaryjustice #ucmjarticle92 #ucmjarticle90 #ucmj #uslaws #usconstitution
  6. DrWeb @[email protected] ·

    UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

    Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed.

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

    Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
    Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

    This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

    This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

    Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

    Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

    Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

    The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

    Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

    Summary

    The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

    The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

    Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

    This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

    MLA Bibliography

    #2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

    #bibliography #constitutionalduty #dutytodisobeyillegalorders #gemini #geminiai #googlegemini
  7. Alpine Law Associates @[email protected] ·

    lawalpine.com/team

    Alpine Law Associates – Meet Our Expert Legal Team in Nepal

    Discover the dedicated and specialized lawyers behind Alpine Law Associates. Based in Kathmandu, our team features seasoned professionals and rising associates who bring deep expertise and client-focused dedication across civil, criminal, corporate, family, and property law.

    #AlpineLaw #LawAlpine #LegalTeam #LawyersNepal #TrustedLawFirm #LegalExperts #KathmanduLaw #MeetOurTeam #ClientFocused #NepalLaw

    #alpinelaw #lawalpine #legalteam #lawyersnepal #trustedlawfirm #legalexperts
  8. Australia News Beep @[email protected] ·

    Kathleen Folbigg compensation payment opens dollar amount on wrongful imprisonment debate

    Experts are calling for more transparency …
    #NewsBeep #News #Australia #AU #BobMoles #compensation #criminologist #DavidEastman #EileenBaldry #exgratiapayments #FlindersUniversity #KathleenFolbigg #legalexperts #LindyChamberlain #michaeldaley #NSWattorney-general #nswgovernment #RachelDioso-Villa #tracychapman #unsw #whywaskathleenfolbigggiven$2million #wrongfulconviction
    newsbeep.com/au/54069/

    #wrongfulconviction #whywaskathleenfolbigggiven #unsw #tracychapman #racheldioso #nswgovernment
  9. Susan Larson ♀️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🌈 @[email protected] ·

    #Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.

    His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.

    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

    #trump #executiveorders #pushback #legal #challenges #fascist
  10. Susan Larson ♀️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🌈 @[email protected] ·

    #Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.

    His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.

    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

    #trump #executiveorders #pushback #legal #challenges #fascist
  11. Susan Larson ♀️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🌈 @[email protected] ·

    #Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.

    His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.

    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

    #trump #executiveorders #pushback #legal #challenges #fascist
  12. Susan Larson ♀️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🌈 @[email protected] ·

    #Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.

    His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.

    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

    #legislatures #courts #president #legalexperts #scholars #actions
  13. Susan Larson ♀️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🌈 @[email protected] ·

    #Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.

    His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.

    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

    #trump #executiveorders #pushback #legal #challenges #fascist
  14. Richmond Chambers @[email protected] ·

    🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀⁠
    ⁠
    Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. ⁠

    #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork

    #welcometotheteam #richmondchambers #immigrationlaw #legalexperts #newbeginnings #teamwork
  15. Richmond Chambers @[email protected] ·

    🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀⁠
    ⁠
    Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. ⁠

    #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork

    #welcometotheteam #richmondchambers #immigrationlaw #legalexperts #newbeginnings #teamwork
  16. Richmond Chambers @[email protected] ·

    🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀⁠
    ⁠
    Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. ⁠

    #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork

    #welcometotheteam #richmondchambers #immigrationlaw #legalexperts #newbeginnings #teamwork
  17. Richmond Chambers @[email protected] ·

    🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀⁠
    ⁠
    Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. ⁠

    #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork

    #teamwork #newbeginnings #legalexperts #immigrationlaw #richmondchambers #welcometotheteam
  18. Richmond Chambers @[email protected] ·

    🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀⁠
    ⁠
    Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. ⁠

    #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork

    #welcometotheteam #richmondchambers #immigrationlaw #legalexperts #newbeginnings #teamwork
  19. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Discrepancies in a $48 Million Loan Involving Trump and His Chicago Tower Should be Criminally Investigated: Legal Experts

    themessenger.com/politics/trum

    #TrumpTowerLoan #ChicagoTower #CriminalInvestigation #TaxEvasion #LegalExperts #Discrepancies #Politics #News

    #trumptowerloan #chicagotower #criminalinvestigation #taxevasion #legalexperts #discrepancies
  20. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Experts: Filing shows how Trump plans to go around Judge Chutkan to stop case “dead in its tracks”

    salon.com/2023/12/08/experts-f

    #Salon #TrumpCase #JudgeChutkan #FilingStrategy #StoppingCase #LegalExperts #Politics #News

    #salon #trumpcase #judgechutkan #filingstrategy #stoppingcase #legalexperts
  21. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News

    #trumpruling #legalexperts #worstdecision #bubbleburst #coloradonews #huffpost
  22. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News

    #trumpruling #legalexperts #worstdecision #bubbleburst #coloradonews #huffpost
  23. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News

    #trumpruling #legalexperts #worstdecision #bubbleburst #coloradonews #huffpost
  24. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News

    #news #politics #huffpost #coloradonews #bubbleburst #worstdecision
  25. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News

    #trumpruling #legalexperts #worstdecision #bubbleburst #coloradonews #huffpost
  26. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"

    salon.com/2023/11/14/this-is-a

    #Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #trumpcitizensarrest #actualincitement #alarmed #mastodon
  27. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"

    salon.com/2023/11/14/this-is-a

    #Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #trumpcitizensarrest #actualincitement #alarmed #mastodon
  28. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"

    salon.com/2023/11/14/this-is-a

    #Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #trumpcitizensarrest #actualincitement #alarmed #mastodon
  29. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"

    salon.com/2023/11/14/this-is-a

    #Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News

    #news #politics #mastodon #alarmed #actualincitement #trumpcitizensarrest
  30. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"

    salon.com/2023/11/14/this-is-a

    #Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #trumpcitizensarrest #actualincitement #alarmed #mastodon
  31. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "Damning": Legal experts say NY AG got Trump to make "critical admission" in fraud testimony

    salon.com/2023/11/07/damning-l

    #NYAGFraudTestimony #LegalExperts #CriticalAdmission #TrumpFraudTestimony #FraudInvestigation #SalonNews #Politics #News

    #nyagfraudtestimony #legalexperts #criticaladmission #trumpfraudtestimony #fraudinvestigation #salonnews
  32. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "Verging on a confession": Legal experts say Trump "admitting to more fraud" in word-salad testimony

    salon.com/2023/11/06/verging-o

    #Salon #TrumpFraud #Confession #LegalExperts #WordSaladTestimony #MoreFraud #Politics #News

    #salon #trumpfraud #confession #legalexperts #wordsaladtestimony #morefraud
  33. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "Doesn't know how to act in front of a judge": Legal experts school Trump lawyer over meltdown

    salon.com/2023/11/06/doesnt-kn

    #Salon #TrumpLawyer #LegalExperts #JudgeMeltdown #HowToAct #Schooling #Politics #News

    #salon #trumplawyer #legalexperts #judgemeltdown #howtoact #schooling
  34. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    “Crazy thing to say to a judge”: Experts stunned after judge explodes at Trump lawyer’s “misogyny”

    salon.com/2023/11/03/crazy-thi

    #Salon #JudgeExplodes #TrumpLawyer #Misogyny #LegalExperts #CrazyThingToSay #Politics #News

    #salon #judgeexplodes #trumplawyer #misogyny #legalexperts #crazythingtosay
  35. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal experts warn Judge Aileen Cannon is "setting up to give Trump another fat delay" in docs trial

    salon.com/2023/11/02/legal-exp

    #Salon #LegalExperts #JudgeAileenCannon #TrumpDelay #DocsTrial #LegalWarnings #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #judgeaileencannon #trumpdelay #docstrial #legalwarnings
  36. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal experts: NY AG “set up” Don Jr. on witness stand — and now he could be criminally prosecuted

    salon.com/2023/11/02/legal-exp

    #NYAGSetUp #DonJrWitnessStand #CriminalProsecution #LegalExperts #SalonNews #AGInvestigation #Politics #News

    #nyagsetup #donjrwitnessstand #criminalprosecution #legalexperts #salonnews #aginvestigation
  37. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Experts: Trump already "in violation" of D.C. gag order — and may “spend a night or weekend in jail"

    salon.com/2023/10/31/experts-a

    #Salon #TrumpGagOrder #DCViolation #JailTime #LegalExperts #FirstAmendment #Politics #News

    #salon #trumpgagorder #dcviolation #jailtime #legalexperts #firstamendment
  38. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal experts: Trump may have already “violated” gag order minutes after judge reimposed it

    salon.com/2023/10/30/legal-exp

    #Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpGagOrderViolation #JudicialRuling #FreeSpeechRights #FirstAmendment #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #trumpgagorderviolation #judicialruling #freespeechrights #firstamendment
  39. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal experts: Trump's defense may be doomed as 5 more co-defendants seek Fulton plea deals

    salon.com/2023/10/26/legal-exp

    #Salon #TrumpDefense #DoomedDefense #CoDefendants #FultonPleaDeals #LegalExperts #Politics #News

    #salon #trumpdefense #doomeddefense #codefendants #fultonpleadeals #legalexperts
  40. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    ‘He’s like a mob boss’: legal experts alarmed by Trump’s attacks on judges

    theguardian.com/us-news/2023/o

    #TrumpJudges #LegalExperts #MobBossPresident #AttacksOnJudges #AlarmedByTrump #JudicialIndependence #Politics #News

    #trumpjudges #legalexperts #mobbosspresident #attacksonjudges #alarmedbytrump #judicialindependence
  41. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    "Already an embarrassment": Legal experts shred Judge Aileen Cannon for granting Trump "delay"

    salon.com/2023/10/06/already-a

    #Salon #LegalExperts #JudgeAileenCannon #TrumpDelay #Embarrassment #LegalShredding #Politics #News

    #salon #legalexperts #judgeaileencannon #trumpdelay #embarrassment #legalshredding
  42. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal experts: Trump's unhinged attack on judge in court shows he "realizes he's going to lose"

    salon.com/2023/10/02/legal-exp

    #TrumpLoses #UnhingedAttack #LegalExperts #RealizesLoss #CourtShowdown #JudicialSystem #Politics #News

    #trumploses #unhingedattack #legalexperts #realizesloss #courtshowdown #judicialsystem
  43. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Say Donald Trump Just Threw His Own Legal Defense ‘Under The Bus'

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #DonaldTrumpLegalDefense #LegalExperts #UnderTheBus #LegalDefenseDoomed #TrumpLegalTeam #LegalAnalysis #Politics #News

    #donaldtrumplegaldefense #legalexperts #underthebus #legaldefensedoomed #trumplegalteam #legalanalysis
  44. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal Experts Have A Field Day With Trump's Megyn Kelly Interview

    huffpost.com/entry/donald-trum

    #TrumpInterview #LegalExperts #MegynKelly #FieldDay #DonaldTrump #HuffPost #Politics #News

    #trumpinterview #legalexperts #megynkelly #fieldday #donaldtrump #huffpost
  45. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Trump's claims he can do "whatever" he wants "constitute virtual confessions": legal experts

    salon.com/2023/09/08/claims-he

    #TrumpClaims #VirtualConfessions #LegalExperts #ExecutivePower #ConstitutionalLimits #RuleofLaw #Politics #News

    #trumpclaims #virtualconfessions #legalexperts #executivepower #constitutionallimits #ruleoflaw
  46. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Trump has raised millions with his mug shot. Legal experts say it could be a big mistake

    the-independent.com/news/world

    #TrumpMugshot #LegalExperts #CopyrightLaw #Mistake #NewsSourceName #MillionsRaised #Politics #News

    #trumpmugshot #legalexperts #copyrightlaw #mistake #newssourcename #millionsraised
  47. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Legal experts: John Eastman "literally just confessed to the crime" in Fox News interview - "He’s admitting to committing federal crimes on national television," says law professor Anthony Michael Kreis

    salon.com/2023/09/01/legal-exp

    #JohnEastmanCrime #FoxNewsInterview #FederalCrimes #NationalTelevision #LegalExperts #Confession #Politics #News

    #johneastmancrime #foxnewsinterview #federalcrimes #nationaltelevision #legalexperts #confession
  48. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Trump says he'll appeal DC trial date; legal experts say that's not possible

    reuters.com/world/us/trump-say

    #TrumpAppeal #DCtrial #LegalExperts #FederalElectionCase #TrialDate #NotPossible #Politics #News

    #trumpappeal #dctrial #legalexperts #federalelectioncase #trialdate #notpossible
  49. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Trump says he'll appeal DC trial date; legal experts say that's not possible

    reuters.com/world/us/trump-say

    #TrumpAppeal #DCtrial #LegalExperts #FederalElectionCase #TrialDate #NotPossible #Politics #News

    #trumpappeal #dctrial #legalexperts #federalelectioncase #trialdate #notpossible
  50. U.S. Politics in Real Time @[email protected] ·

    Trump says he'll appeal DC trial date; legal experts say that's not possible

    reuters.com/world/us/trump-say

    #TrumpAppeal #DCtrial #LegalExperts #FederalElectionCase #TrialDate #NotPossible #Politics #News

    #trumpappeal #dctrial #legalexperts #federalelectioncase #trialdate #notpossible