#legalexperts — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #legalexperts, aggregated by home.social.
-
Array of Experts Back Lawsuit Challenging Trump’s ICC Sanctions Regime https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/09/25/array-of-experts-back-lawsuit-challenging-trumps-icc-sanctions-regime #uspoli #TrumpRegime #ICC #TrumpICCsanctions #HumanRights #LegalExperts #lawsuits #TrumpTheDestroyer #USMidterms #BlameTrump
-
Tokyo criminalises national flag desecration despite criticisms
THE nation enacted a law that criminalises damaging the national flag as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi pushes forward…
#EuropeSays #Japan #JP #Tokyo #criminallaw #criminalisation #foreignflags #freedomofexpression #legalexperts #nationalflag #oppositionlawmaker #politicalexpression #PrimeMinisterSanaeTakaichi #USSupremeCourtdecision
https://www.europesays.com/japan/60265/ -
@Abdirahmanirro has officially opened #Somaliland's 10th #NationalJudicialConference, reaffirming his administration's commitment to #JudicialIndependence, #ConstitutionalGovernance & #EqualAccess to #Justice. The conference brings together #judges, #lawmakers & #LegalExperts to chart the future of Somaliland's justice sector. #RuleOfLaw
https://saxafimedia.com/president-10th-national-judicial-conference/
-
https://www.europesays.com/ie/508686/ 2026’s Most Influential Personalities – Making an Impact #AdvertorialDisclaimer #Astrology #Business #EducationHealthcare #Éire #Entrepreneurship #hospitality #IE #IndianEntrepreneurs #innovation #InspiringLeaders #Ireland #LegalExperts #MediaIndustry #MostInfluentialPersonalities2026 #PNN #PublicRelations #TMN #TMPR
-
2026’s Most Influential Personalities – Making an Impact
PNNNew Delhi [India], May 28: In an era driven by innovation, leadership, and purpose, a new generat…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Entrepreneurship #AdvertorialDisclaimer #Astrology #Business #EducationHealthcare #hospitality #Indianentrepreneurs #Innovation #InspiringLeaders #Legalexperts #mediaindustry #MostInfluentialPersonalities2026 #PNN #publicrelations #TMN #TMPR
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/671694/ -
2026’s Most Influential Personalities – Making an Impact
PNNNew Delhi [India], May 28: In an era driven by innovation, leadership, and purpose, a new generat…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Entrepreneurship #AdvertorialDisclaimer #Astrology #Business #EducationHealthcare #hospitality #Indianentrepreneurs #Innovation #InspiringLeaders #Legalexperts #mediaindustry #MostInfluentialPersonalities2026 #PNN #publicrelations #TMN #TMPR
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/671694/ -
yahoo news | Melania Trump's emails released with Epstein files resurface after she makes...
Melania Trump’s personal email archive has been made public, revealing a trove of messages that intersect with the Jeffrey Epstein case. The release came shortly after the former first lady delivered a stark warning at the White House, demanding that Congress hold hearings to examine the files that survivors say could shed new light on Epstein’s network. In her speech, Melania urged lawmakers to “bring every piece of evidence to light” and to give victims a platform to be heard, positioning the email dump as a crucial step toward that goal.
The newly released emails include correspondence between Melania and members of the Trump inner circle, as well as communications with attorneys and investigators handling the Epstein investigation. Among the disclosed messages are references to meetings scheduled with key figures linked to the 2016‑2020 period, requests for clarification on financial transactions tied to Epstein’s offshore accounts, and internal discussions about the potential legal ramifications of the scandal. The documents suggest that Melania was aware of, and at times directly involved in, efforts to manage the narrative surrounding the late financier’s alleged crimes.
Reactions to the leak have been swift and polarized. Democratic leaders have praised the former first lady’s push for transparency, calling the emails “potentially explosive” evidence that could support ongoing lawsuits filed by Epstein’s victims. Republican officials, meanwhile, have dismissed the release as a politically motivated “media stunt,” arguing that the content offers little new insight beyond what investigators already possess. Legal experts note that while the emails may not constitute fresh prosecutorial evidence, they could influence public opinion and pressure legislative bodies to act on the longstanding calls for a comprehensive inquiry into the Epstein affair.
Read more: https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/melania-trump-epstein-files-emails-statement-722186-20260410
#melaniatrump #jeffreyepstein #whitehouse #trump #legalexperts
-
yahoo news | Melania Trump's emails released with Epstein files resurface after she makes...
Melania Trump’s personal email archive has been made public, revealing a trove of messages that intersect with the Jeffrey Epstein case. The release came shortly after the former first lady delivered a stark warning at the White House, demanding that Congress hold hearings to examine the files that survivors say could shed new light on Epstein’s network. In her speech, Melania urged lawmakers to “bring every piece of evidence to light” and to give victims a platform to be heard, positioning the email dump as a crucial step toward that goal.
The newly released emails include correspondence between Melania and members of the Trump inner circle, as well as communications with attorneys and investigators handling the Epstein investigation. Among the disclosed messages are references to meetings scheduled with key figures linked to the 2016‑2020 period, requests for clarification on financial transactions tied to Epstein’s offshore accounts, and internal discussions about the potential legal ramifications of the scandal. The documents suggest that Melania was aware of, and at times directly involved in, efforts to manage the narrative surrounding the late financier’s alleged crimes.
Reactions to the leak have been swift and polarized. Democratic leaders have praised the former first lady’s push for transparency, calling the emails “potentially explosive” evidence that could support ongoing lawsuits filed by Epstein’s victims. Republican officials, meanwhile, have dismissed the release as a politically motivated “media stunt,” arguing that the content offers little new insight beyond what investigators already possess. Legal experts note that while the emails may not constitute fresh prosecutorial evidence, they could influence public opinion and pressure legislative bodies to act on the longstanding calls for a comprehensive inquiry into the Epstein affair.
Read more: https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/melania-trump-epstein-files-emails-statement-722186-20260410
#melaniatrump #jeffreyepstein #whitehouse #trump #legalexperts
-
yahoo news | Melania Trump's emails released with Epstein files resurface after she makes...
Melania Trump’s personal email archive has been made public, revealing a trove of messages that intersect with the Jeffrey Epstein case. The release came shortly after the former first lady delivered a stark warning at the White House, demanding that Congress hold hearings to examine the files that survivors say could shed new light on Epstein’s network. In her speech, Melania urged lawmakers to “bring every piece of evidence to light” and to give victims a platform to be heard, positioning the email dump as a crucial step toward that goal.
The newly released emails include correspondence between Melania and members of the Trump inner circle, as well as communications with attorneys and investigators handling the Epstein investigation. Among the disclosed messages are references to meetings scheduled with key figures linked to the 2016‑2020 period, requests for clarification on financial transactions tied to Epstein’s offshore accounts, and internal discussions about the potential legal ramifications of the scandal. The documents suggest that Melania was aware of, and at times directly involved in, efforts to manage the narrative surrounding the late financier’s alleged crimes.
Reactions to the leak have been swift and polarized. Democratic leaders have praised the former first lady’s push for transparency, calling the emails “potentially explosive” evidence that could support ongoing lawsuits filed by Epstein’s victims. Republican officials, meanwhile, have dismissed the release as a politically motivated “media stunt,” arguing that the content offers little new insight beyond what investigators already possess. Legal experts note that while the emails may not constitute fresh prosecutorial evidence, they could influence public opinion and pressure legislative bodies to act on the longstanding calls for a comprehensive inquiry into the Epstein affair.
Read more: https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/melania-trump-epstein-files-emails-statement-722186-20260410
#melaniatrump #jeffreyepstein #whitehouse #trump #legalexperts
-
yahoo news | Melania Trump's emails released with Epstein files resurface after she makes...
Melania Trump’s personal email archive has been made public, revealing a trove of messages that intersect with the Jeffrey Epstein case. The release came shortly after the former first lady delivered a stark warning at the White House, demanding that Congress hold hearings to examine the files that survivors say could shed new light on Epstein’s network. In her speech, Melania urged lawmakers to “bring every piece of evidence to light” and to give victims a platform to be heard, positioning the email dump as a crucial step toward that goal.
The newly released emails include correspondence between Melania and members of the Trump inner circle, as well as communications with attorneys and investigators handling the Epstein investigation. Among the disclosed messages are references to meetings scheduled with key figures linked to the 2016‑2020 period, requests for clarification on financial transactions tied to Epstein’s offshore accounts, and internal discussions about the potential legal ramifications of the scandal. The documents suggest that Melania was aware of, and at times directly involved in, efforts to manage the narrative surrounding the late financier’s alleged crimes.
Reactions to the leak have been swift and polarized. Democratic leaders have praised the former first lady’s push for transparency, calling the emails “potentially explosive” evidence that could support ongoing lawsuits filed by Epstein’s victims. Republican officials, meanwhile, have dismissed the release as a politically motivated “media stunt,” arguing that the content offers little new insight beyond what investigators already possess. Legal experts note that while the emails may not constitute fresh prosecutorial evidence, they could influence public opinion and pressure legislative bodies to act on the longstanding calls for a comprehensive inquiry into the Epstein affair.
Read more: https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/melania-trump-epstein-files-emails-statement-722186-20260410
#melaniatrump #jeffreyepstein #whitehouse #trump #legalexperts
-
Trump's Threats on Iran: Echoes of War Crimes, Experts Allege
Experts say Donald Trump's threats to attack Iran's power plants and bridges could be war crimes under international law.
#TrumpThreats, #IranWarCrimes, #InternationalLaw, #CivilianInfrastructure, #LegalExperts
https://newsletter.tf/trump-iran-threats-war-crimes-experts-allege/
-
Experts are warning that Donald Trump's threats to target Iranian civilian sites like power plants and bridges could be considered war crimes. This is a serious claim under international law.
#TrumpThreats, #IranWarCrimes, #InternationalLaw, #CivilianInfrastructure, #LegalExperts
https://newsletter.tf/trump-iran-threats-war-crimes-experts-allege/ -
Nandish Communication Honours Trailblazing Women Leaders at ‘Most Powerful Women in Business 2025’
ANI | Updated: Dec 02, 2025 16:51 IST PNNNew Delhi [India], December 2: Nandish Communication successfully hosted the…
#NewsBeep #News #Entrepreneurship #AdvertorialDisclaimer #Business #Edtechpioneers #Legalexperts #PNN #Sustainability #UK #UnitedKingdom
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/300035/ -
https://www.europesays.com/ie/213075/ Nandish Communication Honours Trailblazing Women Leaders at ‘Most Powerful Women in Business 2025’ #AdvertorialDisclaimer #Business #EdtechPioneers #Éire #Entrepreneurship #IE #Ireland #LegalExperts #PNN #Sustainability
-
https://www.europesays.com/uk/608629/ Nandish Communication Honours Trailblazing Women Leaders at ‘Most Powerful Women in Business 2025’ #AdvertorialDisclaimer #Business #EdtechPioneers #Entrepreneurship #LegalExperts #PNN #Sustainability #UK #UnitedKingdom
-
UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025
Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.
Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or RegulationThis article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.
This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.
Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.
Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders
Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.
The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.
Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.
Summary
The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.
The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.
Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.
This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.
MLA Bibliography
- United States Code, Title 10, Section 892, Article 92. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section892&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Daniel Conway and Associates. “Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order.” Military Defense Law Offices. https://www.mcmilitarylaw.com/articles-of-ucmj/article-92-failure-to-obey-an-order/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Cornell Law School. “10 U.S. Code § 892 – Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.” Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/892. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- ABC News. “What the military oath of enlistment says about legal and illegal orders.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/military-oath-enlistment-legal-illegal-orders/story?id=127725085. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- PBS NewsHour. “Trump says Democrats’ video message to military is ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-democrats-video-message-to-military-is-seditious-behavior-punishable-by-death. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “Unlawful Military Orders.” https://www.militarydefense.com/tag/unlawful-military-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Refusing an Unlawful Military Order: Your Legal Rights.” r/navy, https://www.reddit.com/r/navy/comments/1l8zbwp/refusing_an_unlawful_military_order_your_legal/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Times. “4 in 5 US troops surveyed understand duty to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2025/08/14/4-in-5-us-troops-surveyed-understand-duty-to-disobey-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Newsweek. “What US law says about sedition and troops defying illegal orders.” https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-law-says-sedition-troops-defying-illegal-orders-11084527. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- CNN Politics. “Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/19/politics/democratic-lawmakers-urge-troops-to-disobey-illegal-orders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Al Jazeera. “‘Punishable by DEATH’: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/20/punishable-by-death-trump-threatens-democrats-with-sedition-charges. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Uncomfortable with the members of Congress who messaged to not…” r/AirForce, https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1p1b7d4/uncomfortable_with_the_members_of_congress_who/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Group Post. “Military members obligation to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.facebook.com/groups/servicewhenwomencomemarchinghome/posts/24580730314894966/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Law Task Force. “FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.” https://nlgmltf.org/military-law/2025/faq-on-refusing-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- U.S. Army Courts of Criminal Appeals. “Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 91.” https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA15.htm. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Post. “President Trump called for lawmakers from the video to be arrested…” https://www.facebook.com/armytimes/posts/1245362770958632/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.
#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice
-
UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025
Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.
Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or RegulationThis article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.
This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.
Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.
Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders
Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.
The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.
Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.
Summary
The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.
The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.
Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.
This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.
MLA Bibliography
- United States Code, Title 10, Section 892, Article 92. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section892&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Daniel Conway and Associates. “Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order.” Military Defense Law Offices. https://www.mcmilitarylaw.com/articles-of-ucmj/article-92-failure-to-obey-an-order/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Cornell Law School. “10 U.S. Code § 892 – Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.” Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/892. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- ABC News. “What the military oath of enlistment says about legal and illegal orders.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/military-oath-enlistment-legal-illegal-orders/story?id=127725085. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- PBS NewsHour. “Trump says Democrats’ video message to military is ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-democrats-video-message-to-military-is-seditious-behavior-punishable-by-death. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “Unlawful Military Orders.” https://www.militarydefense.com/tag/unlawful-military-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Refusing an Unlawful Military Order: Your Legal Rights.” r/navy, https://www.reddit.com/r/navy/comments/1l8zbwp/refusing_an_unlawful_military_order_your_legal/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Times. “4 in 5 US troops surveyed understand duty to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2025/08/14/4-in-5-us-troops-surveyed-understand-duty-to-disobey-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Newsweek. “What US law says about sedition and troops defying illegal orders.” https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-law-says-sedition-troops-defying-illegal-orders-11084527. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- CNN Politics. “Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/19/politics/democratic-lawmakers-urge-troops-to-disobey-illegal-orders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Al Jazeera. “‘Punishable by DEATH’: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/20/punishable-by-death-trump-threatens-democrats-with-sedition-charges. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Uncomfortable with the members of Congress who messaged to not…” r/AirForce, https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1p1b7d4/uncomfortable_with_the_members_of_congress_who/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Group Post. “Military members obligation to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.facebook.com/groups/servicewhenwomencomemarchinghome/posts/24580730314894966/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Law Task Force. “FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.” https://nlgmltf.org/military-law/2025/faq-on-refusing-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- U.S. Army Courts of Criminal Appeals. “Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 91.” https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA15.htm. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Post. “President Trump called for lawmakers from the video to be arrested…” https://www.facebook.com/armytimes/posts/1245362770958632/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.
#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice
-
UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025
Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.
Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or RegulationThis article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.
This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.
Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.
Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders
Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.
The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.
Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.
Summary
The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.
The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.
Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.
This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.
MLA Bibliography
- United States Code, Title 10, Section 892, Article 92. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section892&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Daniel Conway and Associates. “Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order.” Military Defense Law Offices. https://www.mcmilitarylaw.com/articles-of-ucmj/article-92-failure-to-obey-an-order/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Cornell Law School. “10 U.S. Code § 892 – Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.” Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/892. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- ABC News. “What the military oath of enlistment says about legal and illegal orders.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/military-oath-enlistment-legal-illegal-orders/story?id=127725085. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- PBS NewsHour. “Trump says Democrats’ video message to military is ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-democrats-video-message-to-military-is-seditious-behavior-punishable-by-death. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “Unlawful Military Orders.” https://www.militarydefense.com/tag/unlawful-military-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Refusing an Unlawful Military Order: Your Legal Rights.” r/navy, https://www.reddit.com/r/navy/comments/1l8zbwp/refusing_an_unlawful_military_order_your_legal/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Times. “4 in 5 US troops surveyed understand duty to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2025/08/14/4-in-5-us-troops-surveyed-understand-duty-to-disobey-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Newsweek. “What US law says about sedition and troops defying illegal orders.” https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-law-says-sedition-troops-defying-illegal-orders-11084527. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- CNN Politics. “Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/19/politics/democratic-lawmakers-urge-troops-to-disobey-illegal-orders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Al Jazeera. “‘Punishable by DEATH’: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/20/punishable-by-death-trump-threatens-democrats-with-sedition-charges. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Uncomfortable with the members of Congress who messaged to not…” r/AirForce, https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1p1b7d4/uncomfortable_with_the_members_of_congress_who/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Group Post. “Military members obligation to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.facebook.com/groups/servicewhenwomencomemarchinghome/posts/24580730314894966/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Law Task Force. “FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.” https://nlgmltf.org/military-law/2025/faq-on-refusing-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- U.S. Army Courts of Criminal Appeals. “Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 91.” https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA15.htm. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Post. “President Trump called for lawmakers from the video to be arrested…” https://www.facebook.com/armytimes/posts/1245362770958632/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.
#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice
-
UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025
Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.
Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or RegulationThis article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.
This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.
Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.
Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders
Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.
The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.
Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.
Summary
The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.
The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.
Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.
This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.
MLA Bibliography
- United States Code, Title 10, Section 892, Article 92. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section892&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Daniel Conway and Associates. “Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order.” Military Defense Law Offices. https://www.mcmilitarylaw.com/articles-of-ucmj/article-92-failure-to-obey-an-order/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Cornell Law School. “10 U.S. Code § 892 – Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.” Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/892. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- ABC News. “What the military oath of enlistment says about legal and illegal orders.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/military-oath-enlistment-legal-illegal-orders/story?id=127725085. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- PBS NewsHour. “Trump says Democrats’ video message to military is ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-democrats-video-message-to-military-is-seditious-behavior-punishable-by-death. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “Unlawful Military Orders.” https://www.militarydefense.com/tag/unlawful-military-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Refusing an Unlawful Military Order: Your Legal Rights.” r/navy, https://www.reddit.com/r/navy/comments/1l8zbwp/refusing_an_unlawful_military_order_your_legal/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Times. “4 in 5 US troops surveyed understand duty to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2025/08/14/4-in-5-us-troops-surveyed-understand-duty-to-disobey-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Newsweek. “What US law says about sedition and troops defying illegal orders.” https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-law-says-sedition-troops-defying-illegal-orders-11084527. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- CNN Politics. “Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/19/politics/democratic-lawmakers-urge-troops-to-disobey-illegal-orders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Al Jazeera. “‘Punishable by DEATH’: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/20/punishable-by-death-trump-threatens-democrats-with-sedition-charges. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Uncomfortable with the members of Congress who messaged to not…” r/AirForce, https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1p1b7d4/uncomfortable_with_the_members_of_congress_who/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Group Post. “Military members obligation to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.facebook.com/groups/servicewhenwomencomemarchinghome/posts/24580730314894966/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Law Task Force. “FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.” https://nlgmltf.org/military-law/2025/faq-on-refusing-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- U.S. Army Courts of Criminal Appeals. “Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 91.” https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA15.htm. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Post. “President Trump called for lawmakers from the video to be arrested…” https://www.facebook.com/armytimes/posts/1245362770958632/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.
#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice
-
UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025
Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.
Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or RegulationThis article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.
This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.
Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.
Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders
Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.
The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.
Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.
Summary
The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.
The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.
Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.
This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.
MLA Bibliography
- United States Code, Title 10, Section 892, Article 92. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section892&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Daniel Conway and Associates. “Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order.” Military Defense Law Offices. https://www.mcmilitarylaw.com/articles-of-ucmj/article-92-failure-to-obey-an-order/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Cornell Law School. “10 U.S. Code § 892 – Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.” Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/892. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- ABC News. “What the military oath of enlistment says about legal and illegal orders.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/military-oath-enlistment-legal-illegal-orders/story?id=127725085. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- PBS NewsHour. “Trump says Democrats’ video message to military is ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-democrats-video-message-to-military-is-seditious-behavior-punishable-by-death. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “Unlawful Military Orders.” https://www.militarydefense.com/tag/unlawful-military-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Refusing an Unlawful Military Order: Your Legal Rights.” r/navy, https://www.reddit.com/r/navy/comments/1l8zbwp/refusing_an_unlawful_military_order_your_legal/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Times. “4 in 5 US troops surveyed understand duty to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2025/08/14/4-in-5-us-troops-surveyed-understand-duty-to-disobey-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Newsweek. “What US law says about sedition and troops defying illegal orders.” https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-law-says-sedition-troops-defying-illegal-orders-11084527. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- CNN Politics. “Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/19/politics/democratic-lawmakers-urge-troops-to-disobey-illegal-orders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Al Jazeera. “‘Punishable by DEATH’: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/20/punishable-by-death-trump-threatens-democrats-with-sedition-charges. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Reddit. “Uncomfortable with the members of Congress who messaged to not…” r/AirForce, https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1p1b7d4/uncomfortable_with_the_members_of_congress_who/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Group Post. “Military members obligation to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.facebook.com/groups/servicewhenwomencomemarchinghome/posts/24580730314894966/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Military Law Task Force. “FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.” https://nlgmltf.org/military-law/2025/faq-on-refusing-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- U.S. Army Courts of Criminal Appeals. “Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 91.” https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA15.htm. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- Facebook Post. “President Trump called for lawmakers from the video to be arrested…” https://www.facebook.com/armytimes/posts/1245362770958632/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025.
- United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.
#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice
-
Kathleen Folbigg compensation payment opens dollar amount on wrongful imprisonment debate
Experts are calling for more transparency …
#NewsBeep #News #Australia #AU #BobMoles #compensation #criminologist #DavidEastman #EileenBaldry #exgratiapayments #FlindersUniversity #KathleenFolbigg #legalexperts #LindyChamberlain #michaeldaley #NSWattorney-general #nswgovernment #RachelDioso-Villa #tracychapman #unsw #whywaskathleenfolbigggiven$2million #wrongfulconviction
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/54069/ -
#Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.
His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/
-
#Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.
His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/
-
#Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.
His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/
-
#Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.
His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/
-
#Trump’s #executiveorders already face #pushback, #legal #challenges.
His #fascist #orders include some #actions that #scholars and #legalexperts say may be beyond the reach of the #president’s pen and could be tied up in #courts or #legislatures for years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/
-
🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀
Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork
-
🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀
Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork
-
🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀
Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork
-
🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀
Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork
-
🎉 Exciting News! 🎉 We're delighted to welcome three new talented legal associates to the Richmond Chambers immigration team! 🚀
Please join us in welcoming Alex Ferguson. Sophie Gibson and Miranda Rafferty as they bring their passion for immigration law to chambers. #WelcomeToTheTeam #RichmondChambers #ImmigrationLaw #LegalExperts #NewBeginnings #Teamwork
-
Discrepancies in a $48 Million Loan Involving Trump and His Chicago Tower Should be Criminally Investigated: Legal Experts
https://themessenger.com/politics/trump-tower-chicago-loan-tax-evasion-barbara-jones
#TrumpTowerLoan #ChicagoTower #CriminalInvestigation #TaxEvasion #LegalExperts #Discrepancies #Politics #News
-
Discrepancies in a $48 Million Loan Involving Trump and His Chicago Tower Should be Criminally Investigated: Legal Experts
https://themessenger.com/politics/trump-tower-chicago-loan-tax-evasion-barbara-jones
#TrumpTowerLoan #ChicagoTower #CriminalInvestigation #TaxEvasion #LegalExperts #Discrepancies #Politics #News
-
Discrepancies in a $48 Million Loan Involving Trump and His Chicago Tower Should be Criminally Investigated: Legal Experts
https://themessenger.com/politics/trump-tower-chicago-loan-tax-evasion-barbara-jones
#TrumpTowerLoan #ChicagoTower #CriminalInvestigation #TaxEvasion #LegalExperts #Discrepancies #Politics #News
-
Discrepancies in a $48 Million Loan Involving Trump and His Chicago Tower Should be Criminally Investigated: Legal Experts
https://themessenger.com/politics/trump-tower-chicago-loan-tax-evasion-barbara-jones
#TrumpTowerLoan #ChicagoTower #CriminalInvestigation #TaxEvasion #LegalExperts #Discrepancies #Politics #News
-
@mshallop
This was a mistake in the bill which he retracted, amended and resubmitted.The first cousins are safe, legally anyway.
What I don't get is I assume they had a law so why was this needed?
Any #legalexperts out there know what is going on?
-
Experts: Filing shows how Trump plans to go around Judge Chutkan to stop case “dead in its tracks”
#Salon #TrumpCase #JudgeChutkan #FilingStrategy #StoppingCase #LegalExperts #Politics #News
-
Experts: Filing shows how Trump plans to go around Judge Chutkan to stop case “dead in its tracks”
#Salon #TrumpCase #JudgeChutkan #FilingStrategy #StoppingCase #LegalExperts #Politics #News
-
Experts: Filing shows how Trump plans to go around Judge Chutkan to stop case “dead in its tracks”
#Salon #TrumpCase #JudgeChutkan #FilingStrategy #StoppingCase #LegalExperts #Politics #News
-
Experts: Filing shows how Trump plans to go around Judge Chutkan to stop case “dead in its tracks”
#Salon #TrumpCase #JudgeChutkan #FilingStrategy #StoppingCase #LegalExperts #Politics #News
-
Experts: Filing shows how Trump plans to go around Judge Chutkan to stop case “dead in its tracks”
#Salon #TrumpCase #JudgeChutkan #FilingStrategy #StoppingCase #LegalExperts #Politics #News
-
Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-colorado-news_n_655b1250e4b0704d40f8ffa7
#TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News
-
Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-colorado-news_n_655b1250e4b0704d40f8ffa7
#TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News
-
Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-colorado-news_n_655b1250e4b0704d40f8ffa7
#TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News
-
Legal Experts Burst Trump’s Bubble Over New Ruling: Actually ‘Very Worst Decision' For Him
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-colorado-news_n_655b1250e4b0704d40f8ffa7
#TrumpRuling #LegalExperts #WorstDecision #BubbleBurst #ColoradoNews #HuffPost #Politics #News
-
"This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"
#Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News
-
"This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"
#Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News
-
"This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"
#Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News
-
"This is an actual incitement": Legal experts alarmed after Trump pushes "citizen's arrest"
#Salon #LegalExperts #TrumpCitizensArrest #ActualIncitement #Alarmed #Mastodon #Politics #News
-
"Damning": Legal experts say NY AG got Trump to make "critical admission" in fraud testimony
#NYAGFraudTestimony #LegalExperts #CriticalAdmission #TrumpFraudTestimony #FraudInvestigation #SalonNews #Politics #News
-
"Damning": Legal experts say NY AG got Trump to make "critical admission" in fraud testimony
#NYAGFraudTestimony #LegalExperts #CriticalAdmission #TrumpFraudTestimony #FraudInvestigation #SalonNews #Politics #News
-
"Damning": Legal experts say NY AG got Trump to make "critical admission" in fraud testimony
#NYAGFraudTestimony #LegalExperts #CriticalAdmission #TrumpFraudTestimony #FraudInvestigation #SalonNews #Politics #News
-
"Damning": Legal experts say NY AG got Trump to make "critical admission" in fraud testimony
#NYAGFraudTestimony #LegalExperts #CriticalAdmission #TrumpFraudTestimony #FraudInvestigation #SalonNews #Politics #News
-
"Verging on a confession": Legal experts say Trump "admitting to more fraud" in word-salad testimony
#Salon #TrumpFraud #Confession #LegalExperts #WordSaladTestimony #MoreFraud #Politics #News
-
"Verging on a confession": Legal experts say Trump "admitting to more fraud" in word-salad testimony
#Salon #TrumpFraud #Confession #LegalExperts #WordSaladTestimony #MoreFraud #Politics #News
-
"Verging on a confession": Legal experts say Trump "admitting to more fraud" in word-salad testimony
#Salon #TrumpFraud #Confession #LegalExperts #WordSaladTestimony #MoreFraud #Politics #News
-
"Verging on a confession": Legal experts say Trump "admitting to more fraud" in word-salad testimony
#Salon #TrumpFraud #Confession #LegalExperts #WordSaladTestimony #MoreFraud #Politics #News
-
"Doesn't know how to act in front of a judge": Legal experts school Trump lawyer over meltdown
#Salon #TrumpLawyer #LegalExperts #JudgeMeltdown #HowToAct #Schooling #Politics #News
-
"Doesn't know how to act in front of a judge": Legal experts school Trump lawyer over meltdown
#Salon #TrumpLawyer #LegalExperts #JudgeMeltdown #HowToAct #Schooling #Politics #News
-
"Doesn't know how to act in front of a judge": Legal experts school Trump lawyer over meltdown
#Salon #TrumpLawyer #LegalExperts #JudgeMeltdown #HowToAct #Schooling #Politics #News