home.social

#iopsych — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #iopsych, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Fear of AI replacing you at work may have less to do with the labor market than with how AI is portrayed in the media.

    Our new preprint provides the first experimental evidence that vicarious exposure to narratives framing AI as in control is what triggers replacement anxiety.

    Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/exg7t_

    #AIAnxiety #HumanAIInteraction #WorkPsychology #AIatWork #IOpsych

  2. Why do some workers fear AI far more than others, and what does it cost them?

    Despite growing interest, the field still lacks a validated, theory-driven framework for workplace AI anxiety. Our ongoing research program is building one across a growing number of studies combining experiments, cross-sectional surveys, and psychometrics, grounded in Fear Acquisition Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model.

    OSF (open data & preprints): osf.io/yrjg4/

    #psychology #IOpsych #AI #AIatWork

  3. AI might not be taking jobs at the moment — but many people already fear it.

    In our new preprint (experiment + large panel study), we examine why.

    Drawing on Integrated Fear Acquisition Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, we show that simply framing AI as being “in control” increases job replacement anxiety — especially when AI is seen as highly useful (ease of use didn’t matter).

    Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/exg7t_

    #AI #FutureOfWork #AIAnxiety #NewResearch #IOPsych #IOpsychology

  4. AI might not be taking jobs at the moment — but many people already fear it.

    In our new preprint (experiment + large panel study), we examine why.

    Drawing on Integrated Fear Acquisition Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, we show that simply framing AI as being “in control” increases job replacement anxiety — especially when AI is seen as highly useful (ease of use didn’t matter).

    Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/exg7t_

    #AI #FutureOfWork #AIAnxiety #NewResearch #IOPsych #IOpsychology

  5. AI might not be taking jobs at the moment — but many people already fear it.

    In our new preprint (experiment + large panel study), we examine why.

    Drawing on Integrated Fear Acquisition Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, we show that simply framing AI as being “in control” increases job replacement anxiety — especially when AI is seen as highly useful (ease of use didn’t matter).

    Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/exg7t_

    #AI #FutureOfWork #AIAnxiety #NewResearch #IOPsych #IOpsychology

  6. AI might not be taking jobs at the moment — but many people already fear it.

    In our new preprint (experiment + large panel study), we examine why.

    Drawing on Integrated Fear Acquisition Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, we show that simply framing AI as being “in control” increases job replacement anxiety — especially when AI is seen as highly useful (ease of use didn’t matter).

    Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/exg7t_

    #AI #FutureOfWork #AIAnxiety #NewResearch #IOPsych #IOpsychology

  7. AI might not be taking jobs at the moment — but many people already fear it.

    In our new preprint (experiment + large panel study), we examine why.

    Drawing on Integrated Fear Acquisition Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, we show that simply framing AI as being “in control” increases job replacement anxiety — especially when AI is seen as highly useful (ease of use didn’t matter).

    Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/exg7t_

    #AI #FutureOfWork #AIAnxiety #NewResearch #IOPsych #IOpsychology

  8. Our new longitudinal study shows that work meaning predicts remote-work frequency over time. Employees who find their work highly meaningful tend to limit remote work to protect this psychological resource—offering fresh insight into why many RTO policies fall short.

    #iopsych #psychology #HR #RemoteWork #HybridWork #remoteJobs #iopsychology #managementScience #futureofwork

  9. "Group members choose to minimize their leader’s behaviors and reappraise the questionable behavior as acceptable." #Psychology #IOPsych #SocialPsyc #AcademicSky 🧪

  10. What kinds of interactions distinguish high- from low-performing groups (when it comes to #criticalThinking)?

    56 #students were split into groups of 4 to do some #argumentMapping.

    Video content analysis found the top 27% of groups
    - interrupted less
    - had more positive, fewer negative interactions
    - joked, laughed, and smiled more (sometimes to diffuse potential conflict)
    than the bottom 27% of groups.

    (N = 56, 14 groups of 4)

    doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-006

    #IOpsych #DecisionScience #teaching