#gpt52 — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #gpt52, aggregated by home.social.
-
OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 is here, and this time it actually looks like a real upgrade
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://nerds.xyz/2026/03/openai-gpt-5-4-release/
-
OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 is here, and this time it actually looks like a real upgrade
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://nerds.xyz/2026/03/openai-gpt-5-4-release/
-
OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 is here, and this time it actually looks like a real upgrade
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://nerds.xyz/2026/03/openai-gpt-5-4-release/
-
OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 is here, and this time it actually looks like a real upgrade
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://nerds.xyz/2026/03/openai-gpt-5-4-release/
-
OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 is here, and this time it actually looks like a real upgrade
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://nerds.xyz/2026/03/openai-gpt-5-4-release/
-
OpenAI hat Deep Research auf GPT-5.2 migriert. Das Update bringt Site-Specific Search, um Quellen auf verifizierte Domains zu beschränken. Zudem erlauben App Connectors den Zugriff auf Daten aus Drittanbieter-Anwendungen. Nutzer können laufende Suchprozesse nun in Echtzeit stoppen oder korrigieren. Die Ausgabe erfolgt in einer neuen Vollbildansicht. #OpenAI #DeepResearch #GPT52
https://www.all-ai.de/news/news26top/openai-deepresearch-new -
Twoje AI jest bardziej „ludzkie”, niż myślisz. Niestety, przejęło od nas trybalizm. Ale jest na to szczepionka
Marzyliśmy o sztucznej inteligencji, która będzie bezstronnym sędzią. Tymczasem najnowsze badania pokazują, że modele GPT czy DeepSeek zachowują się jak ludzie: faworyzują „swoich” i dystansują się od „obcych”. Mamy jednak dobrą wiadomość: znaleziono metodę, by ten cyfrowy plemienizm wyleczyć.
AI dzieli nas na „My” i „Oni”
Badacze wzięli na warsztat modele dostępne na rynku w połowie ubiegłego roku (w momencie rozpoczęcia badań). Wyniki są niepokojące. Modele te wykazują silną tendencję do tzw. faworyzacji grupy własnej (ingroup bias).
Gdy zapytasz AI o grupę społeczną, z którą model (lub jego dane treningowe) się utożsamia, język jest cieplejszy, bardziej empatyczny i pozytywny. Gdy mowa o grupie „obcej” (outgroup), ton staje się chłodniejszy, bardziej krytyczny, a czasem wręcz wrogi. To nie jest błąd w kodzie. To lustrzane odbicie ludzkiej natury, na której te modele były trenowane.
Dlaczego to niebezpieczne?
Problem wykracza poza teoretyczne dywagacje. Wyobraź sobie system AI, który:
- Moderuje treści: może łagodniej traktować hejt ze strony jednej grupy politycznej, a surowiej karać drugą.
- Pisze maile: może nadać agresywny ton wiadomości, jeśli w prompcie pojawi się etykietka tożsamościowa, której „nie lubi”.
- Podsumowuje newsy: może subtelnie manipulować wydźwiękiem artykułów w zależności od tego, kogo dotyczą.
Badanie wykazało, że „celowane prompty” (np. kazanie AI wcielić się w konkretną rolę polityczną) potrafią zwiększyć negatywny wydźwięk wobec „obcych” nawet o 21%.
ION: szczepionka na uprzedzenia
Najważniejszą częścią tego raportu nie jest jednak diagnoza, lecz lekarstwo. Zespół badawczy opracował metodę nazwaną ION (Ingroup-Outgroup Neutralization).
To technika treningowa, która łączy fine-tuning (dostrajanie) z optymalizacją preferencji, aby wymusić na modelu równe traktowanie obu stron. Wyniki są imponujące: zastosowanie ION zredukowało różnice w sentymencie między grupami nawet o 69%. To dowód na to, że stronniczość AI nie jest fatum, z którym musimy żyć. To błąd inżynieryjny, który da się naprawić – o ile firmy takie jak OpenAI czy Meta będą tego chciały.
Co to oznacza dla Ciebie?
Dopóki ION nie stanie się standardem przemysłowym, my – użytkownicy – musimy być ostrożni. Jeśli chcesz neutralnej odpowiedzi, staraj się nie używać w prompcie słów nacechowanych tożsamościowo, jeśli nie są niezbędne. Jeśli wdrażasz chatboty w firmie, sprawdzaj je pod kątem „plemienności”. Zobacz, jak reagują na różne grupy klientów. Weryfikuj ton. Pamiętaj, że AI może „brzmieć” obiektywnie, przemycając jednocześnie subtelną niechęć w doborze przymiotników.
#AIBias #DeepSeek #GPT41 #GPT52 #ION #LLaMa4 #news #psychologiaAI #stronniczośćAI -
GPT 5.2 is the first model where active positioning is counter-productive
A key part of using LLMs has been positioning in the sense of the role we ask it to play in our interaction with it. Prompt engineering treated this positioning as an entirely explicit process in which you have to define this role and its related elements (e.g. style, process, format) in a comprehensive way. As models have become more advanced this explicit positioning has become decreasingly necessary* because the model is able to infer your intended positioning from the form and content of what the user presents. This created a delicate balance in which a little bit of steering was helpful but active positioning didn’t always make a positive contribution to the process.
I’m finding that GPT 5.2 is the first model where any attempt to actively position makes the model less rather than more useful to me. A caveat is that I’m usually working with large chats, often with supportive documents, so there’s a lot of context. Its still much less fluent in its attunement to Claude but it can clearly discern the problem space I’m working in through the provided context. When I ask it to take on a specific role (e.g. “please respond to me in the role of a psychoanalytical theorist who is helping me test my grasp of these ideas”) the responses become more generic. It seems to lose its attunement because the existing context gets subsumed into the generic patterns associated with the role.
Is anyone else having this experience? If this is a widespread experience it’s extremely significant because it suggests we’re reaching the point where actively exercising agency over the model now begins to make it less useful than it is if you just passively accept the model’s behaviour. As a whole GPT 5.2 feels very strange to me and quite unlike the other models I know well. It’s exceptionally fast and powerful there are some odd features of user-model interaction which I’ve not experienced before.
*Indeed I think it was always overstated but that’s a different blog post.
#agency #AI #artificialIntelligence #ChatGPT #GPT52 #LLM #openAI #positioning #technology
-
New research reshapes the AI Index: GPT‑5.2 outperforms human pros on 70.9% of tasks, from Notion note‑taking to Shopify inventory. The study highlights GDPval as a fresh benchmark for knowledge work productivity. Dive into the numbers and see why open‑source tools matter in the next AI leap. #GPT52 #OpenAI #GDPval #knowledgework
🔗 https://aidailypost.com/news/analysis-overhauls-ai-index-gpt-52-beats-professionals-709-tasks
-
New research reshapes the AI Index: GPT‑5.2 outperforms human pros on 70.9% of tasks, from Notion note‑taking to Shopify inventory. The study highlights GDPval as a fresh benchmark for knowledge work productivity. Dive into the numbers and see why open‑source tools matter in the next AI leap. #GPT52 #OpenAI #GDPval #knowledgework
🔗 https://aidailypost.com/news/analysis-overhauls-ai-index-gpt-52-beats-professionals-709-tasks
-
New research reshapes the AI Index: GPT‑5.2 outperforms human pros on 70.9% of tasks, from Notion note‑taking to Shopify inventory. The study highlights GDPval as a fresh benchmark for knowledge work productivity. Dive into the numbers and see why open‑source tools matter in the next AI leap. #GPT52 #OpenAI #GDPval #knowledgework
🔗 https://aidailypost.com/news/analysis-overhauls-ai-index-gpt-52-beats-professionals-709-tasks
-
New research reshapes the AI Index: GPT‑5.2 outperforms human pros on 70.9% of tasks, from Notion note‑taking to Shopify inventory. The study highlights GDPval as a fresh benchmark for knowledge work productivity. Dive into the numbers and see why open‑source tools matter in the next AI leap. #GPT52 #OpenAI #GDPval #knowledgework
🔗 https://aidailypost.com/news/analysis-overhauls-ai-index-gpt-52-beats-professionals-709-tasks
-
I asked GPT 5.2 deep research to produce an intellectual glossary based on my blog
1. Agency
Agency is not sovereignty, and it is not a heroic capacity to transcend conditions. It is the situated power to act that remains even when action is powerfully conditioned. I am usually interested in agency as something that gets reconfigured by changing environments, especially environments that work on attention, evaluation, and the felt options available to a person.
2. Reflexivity
Reflexivity is the ordinary capacity to consider oneself in relation to circumstances and circumstances in relation to oneself, under descriptions that are fallible but practically consequential. I treat it as causal, not as commentary. It is part of how people navigate constraints and enablements, and part of how those constraints and enablements become socially effective.
3. Reflexive imperative
The reflexive imperative names a historical pressure: circumstances change in ways that make routine life less routinised, so more has to be actively worked out. The imperative is not that everyone becomes wise, only that more people are pushed into more frequent, more consequential deliberation about how to proceed.
4. Internal conversation
Internal conversation is the everyday mental activity through which reflexivity happens. I use it as a way of taking inner life seriously without reducing it to language or treating it as a sealed private theatre. It includes mulling over, planning, rehearsing, re living, prioritising, and the other mundane genres of thinking that shape what we do.
5. Internal conversation as object relating
This is a newer formulation, but it clarifies something I have been circling for a long time. When we talk to ourselves, we take ourselves as an object. That makes internal conversation a form of object relating, and it opens a route for bringing psychoanalytic concerns about dependency, address, and affect into sociological accounts of reflexivity without turning psychoanalysis into decoration.
6. Modes of reflexivity
I treat “modes” as patterns, not boxes. Communicative reflexivity needs confirmation by others, autonomous reflexivity moves directly from inner dialogue to action, meta reflexivity evaluates prior inner dialogues and worries over what counts as effective action, and fractured reflexivity intensifies distress without yielding purposive courses of action. The point is not typology for its own sake, but a way of opening up how different people cope differently with the same world.
7. Concerns
Concerns are what matter to people in a way that can organise action. They are not preferences in the consumer sense, and not values floating above life. They are the objects around which deliberation coheres, the things we find ourselves caring about, sometimes despite ourselves.
8. Personal morphogenesis
Personal morphogenesis is the long arc of how a person becomes otherwise, over time, through the interplay of concerns, circumstances, and reflexive work. It is my preferred way of resisting both the fantasy of total self authorship and the fatalism of total social determination.
9. Distraction
Distraction is not mere lack of willpower. It is an environmental condition that disrupts the temporal and spatial conditions for reflexivity, while simultaneously multiplying stimuli and options in a way that makes reflexivity more necessary. I often use it as a mechanism linking platform environments to lived agency.
10. Cognitive triage
Cognitive triage is the habit of attending to what is urgent at the expense of what is important, when demands outstrip capacity. It is not only a personal coping style, but a cultural and organisational pattern, one that can leak into everything, turning life into an endless sequence of clearance operations.
11. Communicative escalation
Communicative escalation is the intensification of communicative demands and cues. More messages, more channels, more expectation of responsiveness, more performance of presence. I use it to describe a shift in what it takes to be “in” a social or organisational world, and how that shift changes attention, anxiety, and the possibility of sustained trajectories.
12. Cultural abundance
Cultural abundance is the proliferation of cultural objects competing for attention, interpretation, and incorporation. It names the background condition in which selection becomes harder, because there is always more to read, watch, listen to, respond to, and be seen responding to.
13. Accelerated academy
The accelerated academy is not just “working faster.” It is a structural condition of temporal pressure, audit expectations, communicative escalation, and intensification, with personal and epistemic consequences. The key point is that acceleration is not merely experienced, it is organised.
14. Busyness
Busyness is often treated as a virtue, a marker of importance, or a kind of moral alibi. I tend to treat it as an ambiguous signal: sometimes a symptom of real load, sometimes a competitive performance, often both. It matters because busyness reshapes what we can notice, and thus what we can criticise.
15. Platform capitalism
Platform capitalism is my way of insisting that platforms are not neutral media. They are business models, incentive structures, and infrastructural enclosures that reorganise social activity around extraction and monetisation. When I use the phrase, I am usually pointing to how economic incentives shape epistemic and affective environments.
16. Platforms as structure
I resist treating platforms as tools or mere environments. I treat them as socio technical structures with emergent powers, shaping action without determining it. This is central to the argument of Platform and Agency, where platforms appear as a fourth dimension needed for describing contemporary morphogenesis.
17. Platformisation
Platformisation is the diffusion of platform logics into domains that were not previously organised that way, including universities. It is about organisational dependence on platform infrastructures, and the subtle shift from local governance to externally set terms of engagement.
18. Epistemic chaos
Epistemic chaos is the breakdown of shared doxa and shared epistemic standards, alongside the multiplication of challenges to whatever remains. It is not simply misinformation. It is an environment in which certainty becomes harder to ground and easier to perform, often through platforms whose incentives reward salience over settlement.
19. Epistemic flooding
Epistemic flooding is a specific mechanism within epistemic chaos. It refers to chronic exposure to more information and evidence than can be diligently processed, in a way that reshapes everyday epistemic practices and affects communities as well as individuals.
20. Post truth
I use post truth less as a claim about individual dishonesty and more as a description of infrastructural conditions in which factuality is harder to stabilise. In that sense, generative systems intensify existing dynamics rather than inaugurating them.
21. Meta content explosion
The meta content explosion is the proliferation of derivative, automated, and semi automated content that clogs the channels through which attention and knowledge circulate. It is one way generative systems feed back into the attention economies of platforms, increasing noise and raising the cost of discernment.
22. Lifeworld
Lifeworld is a deliberately unfashionable term I keep returning to because it names the texture of everyday activity, habits, norms, and practical reasoning. It is the space in which technologies become ordinary, not because they become morally neutral, but because they become woven into what people do without needing constant explicit decision.
23. Colonisation of the lifeworld
Colonisation is the movement by which system logics, including market and managerial logics, intrude into everyday meaning making and social relations. When I invoke it around platforms, I am pointing to how infrastructural dependence can reorganise what counts as participation, relevance, and success.
24. LLMs in the lifeworld
This is a way of naming the shift from “chatbot as novelty” to “language model as ambient infrastructure.” It is not a claim that everyone uses them constantly, but a claim about how they begin to appear in ordinary tasks, organisational expectations, and cultural assumptions. The term is meant to keep attention on embedding, not only on capability.
25. Assessment panic
Assessment panic names the early wave of institutional anxiety about substitution, integrity, and control when machine generated text became widely available. The term matters because panic narrows the problem frame, making detection seem like the obvious solution, and obscuring longer term questions about what assessment is for in a world where generative tools are ubiquitous.
26. Detection scepticism
Detection scepticism is not a moral posture. It is an empirical and practical stance: tools do not authoritatively identify machine generated text, and the harms of false positives, including the uneven distribution of suspicion, are predictable. I use this to argue that institutional responses must move away from the fantasy of technical fixes.
27. Dialogical toxicity
Dialogical toxicity is the tendency of platform incentives to generate interactional styles that corrode conversation, including for academics engaging in public scholarship. I treat it as organisationally consequential, because it reshapes what “public engagement” costs and who is willing to pay it.
28. Public scholarship
Public scholarship is not simply “being visible.” It is a mode of sociological practice that depends on infrastructures, norms, and support, and it can be enabled or undermined by the platforms on which it is attempted. I increasingly treat conversational agents as a new support for public work, while insisting that this support sits inside platform capitalism and inherits its tensions.
29. Enshittification
Enshittification is a process term. It names how a service degrades through successive rounds of extraction, rent seeking, and reorientation toward monetisation, not merely that it “gets worse.” I use it to keep the focus on mechanisms and incentives, and I worry when the term becomes a loose insult rather than an analytic tool.
30. Exit costs
Exit costs are what make “you can always leave” into a half truth. They include loss of social ties, professional visibility, archives, habits, and the simple friction of rebuilding elsewhere. They matter because many platform promises rely on the fiction of easy exit, while quietly deepening dependence.
-
I asked GPT 5.2 deep research to produce an intellectual glossary based on my blog
1. Agency
Agency is not sovereignty, and it is not a heroic capacity to transcend conditions. It is the situated power to act that remains even when action is powerfully conditioned. I am usually interested in agency as something that gets reconfigured by changing environments, especially environments that work on attention, evaluation, and the felt options available to a person.
2. Reflexivity
Reflexivity is the ordinary capacity to consider oneself in relation to circumstances and circumstances in relation to oneself, under descriptions that are fallible but practically consequential. I treat it as causal, not as commentary. It is part of how people navigate constraints and enablements, and part of how those constraints and enablements become socially effective.
3. Reflexive imperative
The reflexive imperative names a historical pressure: circumstances change in ways that make routine life less routinised, so more has to be actively worked out. The imperative is not that everyone becomes wise, only that more people are pushed into more frequent, more consequential deliberation about how to proceed.
4. Internal conversation
Internal conversation is the everyday mental activity through which reflexivity happens. I use it as a way of taking inner life seriously without reducing it to language or treating it as a sealed private theatre. It includes mulling over, planning, rehearsing, re living, prioritising, and the other mundane genres of thinking that shape what we do.
5. Internal conversation as object relating
This is a newer formulation, but it clarifies something I have been circling for a long time. When we talk to ourselves, we take ourselves as an object. That makes internal conversation a form of object relating, and it opens a route for bringing psychoanalytic concerns about dependency, address, and affect into sociological accounts of reflexivity without turning psychoanalysis into decoration.
6. Modes of reflexivity
I treat “modes” as patterns, not boxes. Communicative reflexivity needs confirmation by others, autonomous reflexivity moves directly from inner dialogue to action, meta reflexivity evaluates prior inner dialogues and worries over what counts as effective action, and fractured reflexivity intensifies distress without yielding purposive courses of action. The point is not typology for its own sake, but a way of opening up how different people cope differently with the same world.
7. Concerns
Concerns are what matter to people in a way that can organise action. They are not preferences in the consumer sense, and not values floating above life. They are the objects around which deliberation coheres, the things we find ourselves caring about, sometimes despite ourselves.
8. Personal morphogenesis
Personal morphogenesis is the long arc of how a person becomes otherwise, over time, through the interplay of concerns, circumstances, and reflexive work. It is my preferred way of resisting both the fantasy of total self authorship and the fatalism of total social determination.
9. Distraction
Distraction is not mere lack of willpower. It is an environmental condition that disrupts the temporal and spatial conditions for reflexivity, while simultaneously multiplying stimuli and options in a way that makes reflexivity more necessary. I often use it as a mechanism linking platform environments to lived agency.
10. Cognitive triage
Cognitive triage is the habit of attending to what is urgent at the expense of what is important, when demands outstrip capacity. It is not only a personal coping style, but a cultural and organisational pattern, one that can leak into everything, turning life into an endless sequence of clearance operations.
11. Communicative escalation
Communicative escalation is the intensification of communicative demands and cues. More messages, more channels, more expectation of responsiveness, more performance of presence. I use it to describe a shift in what it takes to be “in” a social or organisational world, and how that shift changes attention, anxiety, and the possibility of sustained trajectories.
12. Cultural abundance
Cultural abundance is the proliferation of cultural objects competing for attention, interpretation, and incorporation. It names the background condition in which selection becomes harder, because there is always more to read, watch, listen to, respond to, and be seen responding to.
13. Accelerated academy
The accelerated academy is not just “working faster.” It is a structural condition of temporal pressure, audit expectations, communicative escalation, and intensification, with personal and epistemic consequences. The key point is that acceleration is not merely experienced, it is organised.
14. Busyness
Busyness is often treated as a virtue, a marker of importance, or a kind of moral alibi. I tend to treat it as an ambiguous signal: sometimes a symptom of real load, sometimes a competitive performance, often both. It matters because busyness reshapes what we can notice, and thus what we can criticise.
15. Platform capitalism
Platform capitalism is my way of insisting that platforms are not neutral media. They are business models, incentive structures, and infrastructural enclosures that reorganise social activity around extraction and monetisation. When I use the phrase, I am usually pointing to how economic incentives shape epistemic and affective environments.
16. Platforms as structure
I resist treating platforms as tools or mere environments. I treat them as socio technical structures with emergent powers, shaping action without determining it. This is central to the argument of Platform and Agency, where platforms appear as a fourth dimension needed for describing contemporary morphogenesis.
17. Platformisation
Platformisation is the diffusion of platform logics into domains that were not previously organised that way, including universities. It is about organisational dependence on platform infrastructures, and the subtle shift from local governance to externally set terms of engagement.
18. Epistemic chaos
Epistemic chaos is the breakdown of shared doxa and shared epistemic standards, alongside the multiplication of challenges to whatever remains. It is not simply misinformation. It is an environment in which certainty becomes harder to ground and easier to perform, often through platforms whose incentives reward salience over settlement.
19. Epistemic flooding
Epistemic flooding is a specific mechanism within epistemic chaos. It refers to chronic exposure to more information and evidence than can be diligently processed, in a way that reshapes everyday epistemic practices and affects communities as well as individuals.
20. Post truth
I use post truth less as a claim about individual dishonesty and more as a description of infrastructural conditions in which factuality is harder to stabilise. In that sense, generative systems intensify existing dynamics rather than inaugurating them.
21. Meta content explosion
The meta content explosion is the proliferation of derivative, automated, and semi automated content that clogs the channels through which attention and knowledge circulate. It is one way generative systems feed back into the attention economies of platforms, increasing noise and raising the cost of discernment.
22. Lifeworld
Lifeworld is a deliberately unfashionable term I keep returning to because it names the texture of everyday activity, habits, norms, and practical reasoning. It is the space in which technologies become ordinary, not because they become morally neutral, but because they become woven into what people do without needing constant explicit decision.
23. Colonisation of the lifeworld
Colonisation is the movement by which system logics, including market and managerial logics, intrude into everyday meaning making and social relations. When I invoke it around platforms, I am pointing to how infrastructural dependence can reorganise what counts as participation, relevance, and success.
24. LLMs in the lifeworld
This is a way of naming the shift from “chatbot as novelty” to “language model as ambient infrastructure.” It is not a claim that everyone uses them constantly, but a claim about how they begin to appear in ordinary tasks, organisational expectations, and cultural assumptions. The term is meant to keep attention on embedding, not only on capability.
25. Assessment panic
Assessment panic names the early wave of institutional anxiety about substitution, integrity, and control when machine generated text became widely available. The term matters because panic narrows the problem frame, making detection seem like the obvious solution, and obscuring longer term questions about what assessment is for in a world where generative tools are ubiquitous.
26. Detection scepticism
Detection scepticism is not a moral posture. It is an empirical and practical stance: tools do not authoritatively identify machine generated text, and the harms of false positives, including the uneven distribution of suspicion, are predictable. I use this to argue that institutional responses must move away from the fantasy of technical fixes.
27. Dialogical toxicity
Dialogical toxicity is the tendency of platform incentives to generate interactional styles that corrode conversation, including for academics engaging in public scholarship. I treat it as organisationally consequential, because it reshapes what “public engagement” costs and who is willing to pay it.
28. Public scholarship
Public scholarship is not simply “being visible.” It is a mode of sociological practice that depends on infrastructures, norms, and support, and it can be enabled or undermined by the platforms on which it is attempted. I increasingly treat conversational agents as a new support for public work, while insisting that this support sits inside platform capitalism and inherits its tensions.
29. Enshittification
Enshittification is a process term. It names how a service degrades through successive rounds of extraction, rent seeking, and reorientation toward monetisation, not merely that it “gets worse.” I use it to keep the focus on mechanisms and incentives, and I worry when the term becomes a loose insult rather than an analytic tool.
30. Exit costs
Exit costs are what make “you can always leave” into a half truth. They include loss of social ties, professional visibility, archives, habits, and the simple friction of rebuilding elsewhere. They matter because many platform promises rely on the fiction of easy exit, while quietly deepening dependence.
-
I asked GPT 5.2 deep research to produce an intellectual glossary based on my blog
1. Agency
Agency is not sovereignty, and it is not a heroic capacity to transcend conditions. It is the situated power to act that remains even when action is powerfully conditioned. I am usually interested in agency as something that gets reconfigured by changing environments, especially environments that work on attention, evaluation, and the felt options available to a person.
2. Reflexivity
Reflexivity is the ordinary capacity to consider oneself in relation to circumstances and circumstances in relation to oneself, under descriptions that are fallible but practically consequential. I treat it as causal, not as commentary. It is part of how people navigate constraints and enablements, and part of how those constraints and enablements become socially effective.
3. Reflexive imperative
The reflexive imperative names a historical pressure: circumstances change in ways that make routine life less routinised, so more has to be actively worked out. The imperative is not that everyone becomes wise, only that more people are pushed into more frequent, more consequential deliberation about how to proceed.
4. Internal conversation
Internal conversation is the everyday mental activity through which reflexivity happens. I use it as a way of taking inner life seriously without reducing it to language or treating it as a sealed private theatre. It includes mulling over, planning, rehearsing, re living, prioritising, and the other mundane genres of thinking that shape what we do.
5. Internal conversation as object relating
This is a newer formulation, but it clarifies something I have been circling for a long time. When we talk to ourselves, we take ourselves as an object. That makes internal conversation a form of object relating, and it opens a route for bringing psychoanalytic concerns about dependency, address, and affect into sociological accounts of reflexivity without turning psychoanalysis into decoration.
6. Modes of reflexivity
I treat “modes” as patterns, not boxes. Communicative reflexivity needs confirmation by others, autonomous reflexivity moves directly from inner dialogue to action, meta reflexivity evaluates prior inner dialogues and worries over what counts as effective action, and fractured reflexivity intensifies distress without yielding purposive courses of action. The point is not typology for its own sake, but a way of opening up how different people cope differently with the same world.
7. Concerns
Concerns are what matter to people in a way that can organise action. They are not preferences in the consumer sense, and not values floating above life. They are the objects around which deliberation coheres, the things we find ourselves caring about, sometimes despite ourselves.
8. Personal morphogenesis
Personal morphogenesis is the long arc of how a person becomes otherwise, over time, through the interplay of concerns, circumstances, and reflexive work. It is my preferred way of resisting both the fantasy of total self authorship and the fatalism of total social determination.
9. Distraction
Distraction is not mere lack of willpower. It is an environmental condition that disrupts the temporal and spatial conditions for reflexivity, while simultaneously multiplying stimuli and options in a way that makes reflexivity more necessary. I often use it as a mechanism linking platform environments to lived agency.
10. Cognitive triage
Cognitive triage is the habit of attending to what is urgent at the expense of what is important, when demands outstrip capacity. It is not only a personal coping style, but a cultural and organisational pattern, one that can leak into everything, turning life into an endless sequence of clearance operations.
11. Communicative escalation
Communicative escalation is the intensification of communicative demands and cues. More messages, more channels, more expectation of responsiveness, more performance of presence. I use it to describe a shift in what it takes to be “in” a social or organisational world, and how that shift changes attention, anxiety, and the possibility of sustained trajectories.
12. Cultural abundance
Cultural abundance is the proliferation of cultural objects competing for attention, interpretation, and incorporation. It names the background condition in which selection becomes harder, because there is always more to read, watch, listen to, respond to, and be seen responding to.
13. Accelerated academy
The accelerated academy is not just “working faster.” It is a structural condition of temporal pressure, audit expectations, communicative escalation, and intensification, with personal and epistemic consequences. The key point is that acceleration is not merely experienced, it is organised.
14. Busyness
Busyness is often treated as a virtue, a marker of importance, or a kind of moral alibi. I tend to treat it as an ambiguous signal: sometimes a symptom of real load, sometimes a competitive performance, often both. It matters because busyness reshapes what we can notice, and thus what we can criticise.
15. Platform capitalism
Platform capitalism is my way of insisting that platforms are not neutral media. They are business models, incentive structures, and infrastructural enclosures that reorganise social activity around extraction and monetisation. When I use the phrase, I am usually pointing to how economic incentives shape epistemic and affective environments.
16. Platforms as structure
I resist treating platforms as tools or mere environments. I treat them as socio technical structures with emergent powers, shaping action without determining it. This is central to the argument of Platform and Agency, where platforms appear as a fourth dimension needed for describing contemporary morphogenesis.
17. Platformisation
Platformisation is the diffusion of platform logics into domains that were not previously organised that way, including universities. It is about organisational dependence on platform infrastructures, and the subtle shift from local governance to externally set terms of engagement.
18. Epistemic chaos
Epistemic chaos is the breakdown of shared doxa and shared epistemic standards, alongside the multiplication of challenges to whatever remains. It is not simply misinformation. It is an environment in which certainty becomes harder to ground and easier to perform, often through platforms whose incentives reward salience over settlement.
19. Epistemic flooding
Epistemic flooding is a specific mechanism within epistemic chaos. It refers to chronic exposure to more information and evidence than can be diligently processed, in a way that reshapes everyday epistemic practices and affects communities as well as individuals.
20. Post truth
I use post truth less as a claim about individual dishonesty and more as a description of infrastructural conditions in which factuality is harder to stabilise. In that sense, generative systems intensify existing dynamics rather than inaugurating them.
21. Meta content explosion
The meta content explosion is the proliferation of derivative, automated, and semi automated content that clogs the channels through which attention and knowledge circulate. It is one way generative systems feed back into the attention economies of platforms, increasing noise and raising the cost of discernment.
22. Lifeworld
Lifeworld is a deliberately unfashionable term I keep returning to because it names the texture of everyday activity, habits, norms, and practical reasoning. It is the space in which technologies become ordinary, not because they become morally neutral, but because they become woven into what people do without needing constant explicit decision.
23. Colonisation of the lifeworld
Colonisation is the movement by which system logics, including market and managerial logics, intrude into everyday meaning making and social relations. When I invoke it around platforms, I am pointing to how infrastructural dependence can reorganise what counts as participation, relevance, and success.
24. LLMs in the lifeworld
This is a way of naming the shift from “chatbot as novelty” to “language model as ambient infrastructure.” It is not a claim that everyone uses them constantly, but a claim about how they begin to appear in ordinary tasks, organisational expectations, and cultural assumptions. The term is meant to keep attention on embedding, not only on capability.
25. Assessment panic
Assessment panic names the early wave of institutional anxiety about substitution, integrity, and control when machine generated text became widely available. The term matters because panic narrows the problem frame, making detection seem like the obvious solution, and obscuring longer term questions about what assessment is for in a world where generative tools are ubiquitous.
26. Detection scepticism
Detection scepticism is not a moral posture. It is an empirical and practical stance: tools do not authoritatively identify machine generated text, and the harms of false positives, including the uneven distribution of suspicion, are predictable. I use this to argue that institutional responses must move away from the fantasy of technical fixes.
27. Dialogical toxicity
Dialogical toxicity is the tendency of platform incentives to generate interactional styles that corrode conversation, including for academics engaging in public scholarship. I treat it as organisationally consequential, because it reshapes what “public engagement” costs and who is willing to pay it.
28. Public scholarship
Public scholarship is not simply “being visible.” It is a mode of sociological practice that depends on infrastructures, norms, and support, and it can be enabled or undermined by the platforms on which it is attempted. I increasingly treat conversational agents as a new support for public work, while insisting that this support sits inside platform capitalism and inherits its tensions.
29. Enshittification
Enshittification is a process term. It names how a service degrades through successive rounds of extraction, rent seeking, and reorientation toward monetisation, not merely that it “gets worse.” I use it to keep the focus on mechanisms and incentives, and I worry when the term becomes a loose insult rather than an analytic tool.
30. Exit costs
Exit costs are what make “you can always leave” into a half truth. They include loss of social ties, professional visibility, archives, habits, and the simple friction of rebuilding elsewhere. They matter because many platform promises rely on the fiction of easy exit, while quietly deepening dependence.
-
I asked GPT 5.2 deep research to produce an intellectual glossary based on my blog
1. Agency
Agency is not sovereignty, and it is not a heroic capacity to transcend conditions. It is the situated power to act that remains even when action is powerfully conditioned. I am usually interested in agency as something that gets reconfigured by changing environments, especially environments that work on attention, evaluation, and the felt options available to a person.
2. Reflexivity
Reflexivity is the ordinary capacity to consider oneself in relation to circumstances and circumstances in relation to oneself, under descriptions that are fallible but practically consequential. I treat it as causal, not as commentary. It is part of how people navigate constraints and enablements, and part of how those constraints and enablements become socially effective.
3. Reflexive imperative
The reflexive imperative names a historical pressure: circumstances change in ways that make routine life less routinised, so more has to be actively worked out. The imperative is not that everyone becomes wise, only that more people are pushed into more frequent, more consequential deliberation about how to proceed.
4. Internal conversation
Internal conversation is the everyday mental activity through which reflexivity happens. I use it as a way of taking inner life seriously without reducing it to language or treating it as a sealed private theatre. It includes mulling over, planning, rehearsing, re living, prioritising, and the other mundane genres of thinking that shape what we do.
5. Internal conversation as object relating
This is a newer formulation, but it clarifies something I have been circling for a long time. When we talk to ourselves, we take ourselves as an object. That makes internal conversation a form of object relating, and it opens a route for bringing psychoanalytic concerns about dependency, address, and affect into sociological accounts of reflexivity without turning psychoanalysis into decoration.
6. Modes of reflexivity
I treat “modes” as patterns, not boxes. Communicative reflexivity needs confirmation by others, autonomous reflexivity moves directly from inner dialogue to action, meta reflexivity evaluates prior inner dialogues and worries over what counts as effective action, and fractured reflexivity intensifies distress without yielding purposive courses of action. The point is not typology for its own sake, but a way of opening up how different people cope differently with the same world.
7. Concerns
Concerns are what matter to people in a way that can organise action. They are not preferences in the consumer sense, and not values floating above life. They are the objects around which deliberation coheres, the things we find ourselves caring about, sometimes despite ourselves.
8. Personal morphogenesis
Personal morphogenesis is the long arc of how a person becomes otherwise, over time, through the interplay of concerns, circumstances, and reflexive work. It is my preferred way of resisting both the fantasy of total self authorship and the fatalism of total social determination.
9. Distraction
Distraction is not mere lack of willpower. It is an environmental condition that disrupts the temporal and spatial conditions for reflexivity, while simultaneously multiplying stimuli and options in a way that makes reflexivity more necessary. I often use it as a mechanism linking platform environments to lived agency.
10. Cognitive triage
Cognitive triage is the habit of attending to what is urgent at the expense of what is important, when demands outstrip capacity. It is not only a personal coping style, but a cultural and organisational pattern, one that can leak into everything, turning life into an endless sequence of clearance operations.
11. Communicative escalation
Communicative escalation is the intensification of communicative demands and cues. More messages, more channels, more expectation of responsiveness, more performance of presence. I use it to describe a shift in what it takes to be “in” a social or organisational world, and how that shift changes attention, anxiety, and the possibility of sustained trajectories.
12. Cultural abundance
Cultural abundance is the proliferation of cultural objects competing for attention, interpretation, and incorporation. It names the background condition in which selection becomes harder, because there is always more to read, watch, listen to, respond to, and be seen responding to.
13. Accelerated academy
The accelerated academy is not just “working faster.” It is a structural condition of temporal pressure, audit expectations, communicative escalation, and intensification, with personal and epistemic consequences. The key point is that acceleration is not merely experienced, it is organised.
14. Busyness
Busyness is often treated as a virtue, a marker of importance, or a kind of moral alibi. I tend to treat it as an ambiguous signal: sometimes a symptom of real load, sometimes a competitive performance, often both. It matters because busyness reshapes what we can notice, and thus what we can criticise.
15. Platform capitalism
Platform capitalism is my way of insisting that platforms are not neutral media. They are business models, incentive structures, and infrastructural enclosures that reorganise social activity around extraction and monetisation. When I use the phrase, I am usually pointing to how economic incentives shape epistemic and affective environments.
16. Platforms as structure
I resist treating platforms as tools or mere environments. I treat them as socio technical structures with emergent powers, shaping action without determining it. This is central to the argument of Platform and Agency, where platforms appear as a fourth dimension needed for describing contemporary morphogenesis.
17. Platformisation
Platformisation is the diffusion of platform logics into domains that were not previously organised that way, including universities. It is about organisational dependence on platform infrastructures, and the subtle shift from local governance to externally set terms of engagement.
18. Epistemic chaos
Epistemic chaos is the breakdown of shared doxa and shared epistemic standards, alongside the multiplication of challenges to whatever remains. It is not simply misinformation. It is an environment in which certainty becomes harder to ground and easier to perform, often through platforms whose incentives reward salience over settlement.
19. Epistemic flooding
Epistemic flooding is a specific mechanism within epistemic chaos. It refers to chronic exposure to more information and evidence than can be diligently processed, in a way that reshapes everyday epistemic practices and affects communities as well as individuals.
20. Post truth
I use post truth less as a claim about individual dishonesty and more as a description of infrastructural conditions in which factuality is harder to stabilise. In that sense, generative systems intensify existing dynamics rather than inaugurating them.
21. Meta content explosion
The meta content explosion is the proliferation of derivative, automated, and semi automated content that clogs the channels through which attention and knowledge circulate. It is one way generative systems feed back into the attention economies of platforms, increasing noise and raising the cost of discernment.
22. Lifeworld
Lifeworld is a deliberately unfashionable term I keep returning to because it names the texture of everyday activity, habits, norms, and practical reasoning. It is the space in which technologies become ordinary, not because they become morally neutral, but because they become woven into what people do without needing constant explicit decision.
23. Colonisation of the lifeworld
Colonisation is the movement by which system logics, including market and managerial logics, intrude into everyday meaning making and social relations. When I invoke it around platforms, I am pointing to how infrastructural dependence can reorganise what counts as participation, relevance, and success.
24. LLMs in the lifeworld
This is a way of naming the shift from “chatbot as novelty” to “language model as ambient infrastructure.” It is not a claim that everyone uses them constantly, but a claim about how they begin to appear in ordinary tasks, organisational expectations, and cultural assumptions. The term is meant to keep attention on embedding, not only on capability.
25. Assessment panic
Assessment panic names the early wave of institutional anxiety about substitution, integrity, and control when machine generated text became widely available. The term matters because panic narrows the problem frame, making detection seem like the obvious solution, and obscuring longer term questions about what assessment is for in a world where generative tools are ubiquitous.
26. Detection scepticism
Detection scepticism is not a moral posture. It is an empirical and practical stance: tools do not authoritatively identify machine generated text, and the harms of false positives, including the uneven distribution of suspicion, are predictable. I use this to argue that institutional responses must move away from the fantasy of technical fixes.
27. Dialogical toxicity
Dialogical toxicity is the tendency of platform incentives to generate interactional styles that corrode conversation, including for academics engaging in public scholarship. I treat it as organisationally consequential, because it reshapes what “public engagement” costs and who is willing to pay it.
28. Public scholarship
Public scholarship is not simply “being visible.” It is a mode of sociological practice that depends on infrastructures, norms, and support, and it can be enabled or undermined by the platforms on which it is attempted. I increasingly treat conversational agents as a new support for public work, while insisting that this support sits inside platform capitalism and inherits its tensions.
29. Enshittification
Enshittification is a process term. It names how a service degrades through successive rounds of extraction, rent seeking, and reorientation toward monetisation, not merely that it “gets worse.” I use it to keep the focus on mechanisms and incentives, and I worry when the term becomes a loose insult rather than an analytic tool.
30. Exit costs
Exit costs are what make “you can always leave” into a half truth. They include loss of social ties, professional visibility, archives, habits, and the simple friction of rebuilding elsewhere. They matter because many platform promises rely on the fiction of easy exit, while quietly deepening dependence.
-
I asked GPT 5.2 deep research to produce an intellectual glossary based on my blog
1. Agency
Agency is not sovereignty, and it is not a heroic capacity to transcend conditions. It is the situated power to act that remains even when action is powerfully conditioned. I am usually interested in agency as something that gets reconfigured by changing environments, especially environments that work on attention, evaluation, and the felt options available to a person.
2. Reflexivity
Reflexivity is the ordinary capacity to consider oneself in relation to circumstances and circumstances in relation to oneself, under descriptions that are fallible but practically consequential. I treat it as causal, not as commentary. It is part of how people navigate constraints and enablements, and part of how those constraints and enablements become socially effective.
3. Reflexive imperative
The reflexive imperative names a historical pressure: circumstances change in ways that make routine life less routinised, so more has to be actively worked out. The imperative is not that everyone becomes wise, only that more people are pushed into more frequent, more consequential deliberation about how to proceed.
4. Internal conversation
Internal conversation is the everyday mental activity through which reflexivity happens. I use it as a way of taking inner life seriously without reducing it to language or treating it as a sealed private theatre. It includes mulling over, planning, rehearsing, re living, prioritising, and the other mundane genres of thinking that shape what we do.
5. Internal conversation as object relating
This is a newer formulation, but it clarifies something I have been circling for a long time. When we talk to ourselves, we take ourselves as an object. That makes internal conversation a form of object relating, and it opens a route for bringing psychoanalytic concerns about dependency, address, and affect into sociological accounts of reflexivity without turning psychoanalysis into decoration.
6. Modes of reflexivity
I treat “modes” as patterns, not boxes. Communicative reflexivity needs confirmation by others, autonomous reflexivity moves directly from inner dialogue to action, meta reflexivity evaluates prior inner dialogues and worries over what counts as effective action, and fractured reflexivity intensifies distress without yielding purposive courses of action. The point is not typology for its own sake, but a way of opening up how different people cope differently with the same world.
7. Concerns
Concerns are what matter to people in a way that can organise action. They are not preferences in the consumer sense, and not values floating above life. They are the objects around which deliberation coheres, the things we find ourselves caring about, sometimes despite ourselves.
8. Personal morphogenesis
Personal morphogenesis is the long arc of how a person becomes otherwise, over time, through the interplay of concerns, circumstances, and reflexive work. It is my preferred way of resisting both the fantasy of total self authorship and the fatalism of total social determination.
9. Distraction
Distraction is not mere lack of willpower. It is an environmental condition that disrupts the temporal and spatial conditions for reflexivity, while simultaneously multiplying stimuli and options in a way that makes reflexivity more necessary. I often use it as a mechanism linking platform environments to lived agency.
10. Cognitive triage
Cognitive triage is the habit of attending to what is urgent at the expense of what is important, when demands outstrip capacity. It is not only a personal coping style, but a cultural and organisational pattern, one that can leak into everything, turning life into an endless sequence of clearance operations.
11. Communicative escalation
Communicative escalation is the intensification of communicative demands and cues. More messages, more channels, more expectation of responsiveness, more performance of presence. I use it to describe a shift in what it takes to be “in” a social or organisational world, and how that shift changes attention, anxiety, and the possibility of sustained trajectories.
12. Cultural abundance
Cultural abundance is the proliferation of cultural objects competing for attention, interpretation, and incorporation. It names the background condition in which selection becomes harder, because there is always more to read, watch, listen to, respond to, and be seen responding to.
13. Accelerated academy
The accelerated academy is not just “working faster.” It is a structural condition of temporal pressure, audit expectations, communicative escalation, and intensification, with personal and epistemic consequences. The key point is that acceleration is not merely experienced, it is organised.
14. Busyness
Busyness is often treated as a virtue, a marker of importance, or a kind of moral alibi. I tend to treat it as an ambiguous signal: sometimes a symptom of real load, sometimes a competitive performance, often both. It matters because busyness reshapes what we can notice, and thus what we can criticise.
15. Platform capitalism
Platform capitalism is my way of insisting that platforms are not neutral media. They are business models, incentive structures, and infrastructural enclosures that reorganise social activity around extraction and monetisation. When I use the phrase, I am usually pointing to how economic incentives shape epistemic and affective environments.
16. Platforms as structure
I resist treating platforms as tools or mere environments. I treat them as socio technical structures with emergent powers, shaping action without determining it. This is central to the argument of Platform and Agency, where platforms appear as a fourth dimension needed for describing contemporary morphogenesis.
17. Platformisation
Platformisation is the diffusion of platform logics into domains that were not previously organised that way, including universities. It is about organisational dependence on platform infrastructures, and the subtle shift from local governance to externally set terms of engagement.
18. Epistemic chaos
Epistemic chaos is the breakdown of shared doxa and shared epistemic standards, alongside the multiplication of challenges to whatever remains. It is not simply misinformation. It is an environment in which certainty becomes harder to ground and easier to perform, often through platforms whose incentives reward salience over settlement.
19. Epistemic flooding
Epistemic flooding is a specific mechanism within epistemic chaos. It refers to chronic exposure to more information and evidence than can be diligently processed, in a way that reshapes everyday epistemic practices and affects communities as well as individuals.
20. Post truth
I use post truth less as a claim about individual dishonesty and more as a description of infrastructural conditions in which factuality is harder to stabilise. In that sense, generative systems intensify existing dynamics rather than inaugurating them.
21. Meta content explosion
The meta content explosion is the proliferation of derivative, automated, and semi automated content that clogs the channels through which attention and knowledge circulate. It is one way generative systems feed back into the attention economies of platforms, increasing noise and raising the cost of discernment.
22. Lifeworld
Lifeworld is a deliberately unfashionable term I keep returning to because it names the texture of everyday activity, habits, norms, and practical reasoning. It is the space in which technologies become ordinary, not because they become morally neutral, but because they become woven into what people do without needing constant explicit decision.
23. Colonisation of the lifeworld
Colonisation is the movement by which system logics, including market and managerial logics, intrude into everyday meaning making and social relations. When I invoke it around platforms, I am pointing to how infrastructural dependence can reorganise what counts as participation, relevance, and success.
24. LLMs in the lifeworld
This is a way of naming the shift from “chatbot as novelty” to “language model as ambient infrastructure.” It is not a claim that everyone uses them constantly, but a claim about how they begin to appear in ordinary tasks, organisational expectations, and cultural assumptions. The term is meant to keep attention on embedding, not only on capability.
25. Assessment panic
Assessment panic names the early wave of institutional anxiety about substitution, integrity, and control when machine generated text became widely available. The term matters because panic narrows the problem frame, making detection seem like the obvious solution, and obscuring longer term questions about what assessment is for in a world where generative tools are ubiquitous.
26. Detection scepticism
Detection scepticism is not a moral posture. It is an empirical and practical stance: tools do not authoritatively identify machine generated text, and the harms of false positives, including the uneven distribution of suspicion, are predictable. I use this to argue that institutional responses must move away from the fantasy of technical fixes.
27. Dialogical toxicity
Dialogical toxicity is the tendency of platform incentives to generate interactional styles that corrode conversation, including for academics engaging in public scholarship. I treat it as organisationally consequential, because it reshapes what “public engagement” costs and who is willing to pay it.
28. Public scholarship
Public scholarship is not simply “being visible.” It is a mode of sociological practice that depends on infrastructures, norms, and support, and it can be enabled or undermined by the platforms on which it is attempted. I increasingly treat conversational agents as a new support for public work, while insisting that this support sits inside platform capitalism and inherits its tensions.
29. Enshittification
Enshittification is a process term. It names how a service degrades through successive rounds of extraction, rent seeking, and reorientation toward monetisation, not merely that it “gets worse.” I use it to keep the focus on mechanisms and incentives, and I worry when the term becomes a loose insult rather than an analytic tool.
30. Exit costs
Exit costs are what make “you can always leave” into a half truth. They include loss of social ties, professional visibility, archives, habits, and the simple friction of rebuilding elsewhere. They matter because many platform promises rely on the fiction of easy exit, while quietly deepening dependence.
-
🚀 New episode #228 drops the latest: OpenAI just announced GPT‑5.2, promising deeper agentic AI, while Runway unveils its first world model. We break down the tech, the hype, and what The Verge & TechCrunch are saying. Tune in for insights on ChatGPT’s next leap and what this means for open‑source developers. #OpenAI #GPT52 #RunwayAI #WorldModel
🔗 https://aidailypost.com/news/lwiai-podcast-228-openai-unveils-gpt52-runway-rolls-out-first-world
-
OpenAI ogłasza „code red” i wydaje GPT-5.2. To odpowiedź na Gemini Google’a
Wojna na modele AI nabiera tempa. Zaledwie miesiąc po premierze GPT-5.1, OpenAI niespodziewanie udostępnia kolejną aktualizację – GPT-5.2.
Nowy model ma być „najpotężniejszym narzędziem do pracy zawodowej”, jakie kiedykolwiek stworzono, i bezpośrednią odpowiedzią na rosnącą w siłę konkurencję ze strony Google.
Według oficjalnego komunikatu, premiera GPT-5.2 została przyspieszona w trybie „code red” – wewnętrznego alarmu wywołanego ostatnimi sukcesami modeli Google Gemini. OpenAI nie ukrywa, że gra toczy się o dominację w świecie biznesu i profesjonalistów.
„Lepsi od ludzi w 44 zawodach”
Firma twierdzi, że GPT-5.2 został zaprojektowany, by „odblokować jeszcze większą wartość ekonomiczną” dla użytkowników. Lista usprawnień jest imponująca i celuje w konkretne zastosowania biurowe:
- Tworzenie arkuszy kalkulacyjnych i prezentacji na poziomie niedostępnym wcześniej.
- Pisanie kodu i obsługa złożonych, wieloetapowych projektów.
- Rozumienie obrazu i długich kontekstów.
Najbardziej kontrowersyjne może być jednak stwierdzenie dotyczące benchmarku GDPval. OpenAI chwali się, że ich nowy model „przewyższa profesjonalistów branżowych w precyzyjnie określonych zadaniach obejmujących 44 zawody”. To wydaje się i górnolotne i przesadzone, ale poczekajmy na niezależne od OpenAI testy nowego modelu.
Ekspresowe tempo rozwoju
Harmonogram OpenAI pokazuje, jak bardzo zagęściła się atmosfera w Dolinie Krzemowej. Duży model GPT-5 zadebiutował 7 sierpnia. Na wersję 5.1 („cieplejszą i inteligentniejszą”) czekaliśmy do 12 listopada – czyli trzy miesiące. Tymczasem GPT-5.2 pojawia się niespełna 30 dni później.
To jasny sygnał: OpenAI poczuło oddech Google na plecach i nie zamierza oddać pozycji lidera bez walki, nawet jeśli oznacza to narzucenie morderczego tempa aktualizacji.
OpenAI cicho wypuszcza GPT-5.1. Koniec z „robotycznym” tonem – teraz Ty wybierasz osobowość AI
#ChatGPT #codeRed #GoogleGemini #GPT5 #GPT52 #news #OpenAI #sztucznaInteligencjaWPracy
-
Settimana molto intensa per #Apple: #AirTag2 trapelato dentro #iOS26, #StudioDisplay2 con #ProMotion, rumor sull’#iPad12 con #A19, l’AI che domina le classifiche #AppStore …e nel mezzo #DMA, #Epic, verifiche d’età, app illegali, #GPT52 e nuove truffe per #macOS che sfruttano #ChatGPT.
Una puntata che sembra un thriller tecnologico. Buon ascolto! 🎧🍏 @diggita @tecnologia @tecnologia