home.social

#f1000 — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #f1000, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Is #F1000Research using #Eliza to reply to its emails in its open-peer-review #F1000 system?

    2026-01-01 my email:

    > Please find a *human* who can read this email and fix your faulty editorial pipeline. > Please see the full timeline of this editorial process: codeberg.org/boud/open_science

    2026-01-08 F1000Research email:

    > Thank you for mailing us. Could you please elaborate your sent email "Please
    > find a *human* who can read this email and fix your faulty editorial pipeline."

    #ElizaLives !

  2. @brembs @felwert

    Oh, that's good news. I feel more comfortable with #OJS than with #F1000.

  3. A reminder that #BOSC2025 presenters are invited to share their slides/poster on #F1000 in the collection, making them discoverable and citeable with a DOI: f1000research.com/collections/

  4. A reminder that #BOSC2025 presenters are invited to share their slides/poster on #F1000 in the collection, making them discoverable and citeable with a DOI: f1000research.com/collections/

  5. A reminder that #BOSC2025 presenters are invited to share their slides/poster on #F1000 in the collection, making them discoverable and citeable with a DOI: f1000research.com/collections/

  6. A reminder that #BOSC2025 presenters are invited to share their slides/poster on #F1000 in the collection, making them discoverable and citeable with a DOI: f1000research.com/collections/

  7. A reminder that #BOSC2025 presenters are invited to share their slides/poster on #F1000 in the collection, making them discoverable and citeable with a DOI: f1000research.com/collections/

  8. @dasaptaerwin

    #F1000Research is not going to get many reviewers for its #OpenPeerReview system if after two and a half months, a review of version 2 of a paper is still not published:

    f1000research.com/articles/11-

    Receipt of my second review was confirmed by email on 6 Feb 2023 ...

    #F1000 had a nice idea, but currently it doesn't seem to be working.

    #OpenScience

    framapiaf.org/@boud/1086694741

  9. "we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

    ...

    2/

  10. "we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

    ...

    2/

  11. "we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

    ...

    2/

  12. "we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

    ...

    2/

  13. I've been reviewing publisher policies wrt to code availability lately. A few mention FAIR, the American Meteorological Society even link to the FAIR4RS working group, but the journals look to be the first linking in policy the the FAIR4RS principles. Nice!