#repec — Public Fediverse posts

There is an unfortunate mistake in the April 2025 #RePEc rankings for authors: the closeness criterion is measured in reverse order. While this affects the overall ranking, it is not by much, as there are 30+ other criteria and the top two best and worst are dropped. Sorry about that.

https://ideas.repec.org/top/

#dailyRePEc #economics

@msw It can. Most active are probably #SocArXiv https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SocArXiv, #PsyArXiv and #RePEc, while #LawArXiv didn't manage to take off before it had to shut down due to hosting costs.
https://www.infodocket.com/2021/02/02/preprints-statement-on-why-lawarxiv-repository-is-no-longer-accepting-submissions/

@luis_in_brief

"we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

...

2/

https://ideas.repec.org/fantasy.html

Unpopular(?) opinion: In a time when the econ profession is trying to contain extreme pressure and reduce the worshiping of hierarchies and rankings, this #repec "fantasy league" initiative is very much out of touch.
#econtwitter

New relevant #Economics #Paper announcement service also for #AgriculturalEconomics via #repec @RePEc_NEP_AGR

http://nep.repec.org/

A little heads up that all NEP reports by #repec are on #mastodon 👇follow and be updated with all new working papers @czimm_economist

http://nep.repec.org/

@czimm_economist Thank you, Christian! for all your hard work at #RePEc.

@czimm_economist #repec The author-service login on the ranking page is not working - so those of us who have not yet received the monthly link will need to wait?