home.social

#environmentalethics — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #environmentalethics, aggregated by home.social.

  1. A Pagan Case Against Lawns: Rethinking the Tyranny of Turf

    What if your lawn isn’t just grass—but a quieting of the land itself? This Pagan reflection explores how modern yards prioritize control over connection, and how even small changes can restore a living relationship with the world just outside your door.

    pagangrove.wordpress.com/2026/

  2. A Pagan Case Against Lawns: Rethinking the Tyranny of Turf

    What if your lawn isn’t just grass—but a quieting of the land itself? This Pagan reflection explores how modern yards prioritize control over connection, and how even small changes can restore a living relationship with the world just outside your door.

    pagangrove.wordpress.com/2026/

  3. A Pagan Case Against Lawns: Rethinking the Tyranny of Turf

    What if your lawn isn’t just grass—but a quieting of the land itself? This Pagan reflection explores how modern yards prioritize control over connection, and how even small changes can restore a living relationship with the world just outside your door.

    pagangrove.wordpress.com/2026/

  4. A Pagan Case Against Lawns: Rethinking the Tyranny of Turf

    What if your lawn isn’t just grass—but a quieting of the land itself? This Pagan reflection explores how modern yards prioritize control over connection, and how even small changes can restore a living relationship with the world just outside your door.

    pagangrove.wordpress.com/2026/

  5. A Pagan Case Against Lawns: Rethinking the Tyranny of Turf

    What if your lawn isn’t just grass—but a quieting of the land itself? This Pagan reflection explores how modern yards prioritize control over connection, and how even small changes can restore a living relationship with the world just outside your door.

    pagangrove.wordpress.com/2026/

  6. Exploring Environmental Ethics by Kimberly K. Smith, 2018

    This book is designed as a basic text for courses that are part of an interdisciplinary program in environmental studies. The intended reader is anyone who expects environmental stewardship to be an important part of his or her life, as a citizen, a policy maker, or an environmental management professional.

    @bookstodon
    #books
    #nonfiction
    #EnvironmentalEthics

  7. I'm studying environmental ethics atm so please excuse my somewhat spammy musings and sharing of interesting things I find. I think it is valuable and genuinely interesting and stimulating. I hope it helps someone to explore new ideas, learn words/ways to communicate existing ideas, and get new insights into history, philosophy, and the environment.

    #philosophy #environmentalethics #ethics

  8. Just like with #PFAS-laden #FirefightingFoam, less #Toxic alternatives are out there, but expense is often cited as a roadblock. TBH, things that benefit the environment and society shouldn't cost more than the toxic originals -- and toxic chemicals should be replaced! Period! Make #BigChemical pay! (Since they probably knew about the hazards but hid them from the public. As usual with Big anything these days...!)

    A #PinkPowder is being used to fight #CaliforniaFires. It's getting everywhere

    by Nadine Yousif, January 13, 2025

    "Its use has been controversial in the past over its potential effects on the #environment.

    "A lawsuit filed in 2022 by the #ForestServiceEmployees for #EnvironmentalEthics, an organisation made up of current and former employees of the #USForestService, accused the federal agency of violating the country's clean water laws by dumping #chemical #FireRetardant from planes onto forests.

    "It argued that the chemical kills fish and is not effective.

    "The following year, a US District judge agreed with the employees, but in her ruling allowed the Forest Service to continue using the retardant as it seeks a permit to do so from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    "The case drew the attention of communities devastated by #wildfires in the past, including the town of #ParadiseCalifornia, which was destroyed by fire in 2018.

    "Its then-mayor, Greg Bolin, hailed the judge's ruling, saying it ensures communities 'have a fighting chance' in the face of fires.

    "The Forest Service told NPR that this year, it phased out the use of one type of #PhosChek formula - #PhosChekLC95 - in favour of another - #MVPFx - saying that the latter is less toxic to #wildlife.

    "The Forest Service also has a mandatory ban in place on dropping fire retardant in sensitive environmental areas, like waterways and habitats of endangered species. There are exceptions to the ban, however, in cases 'when human life or public safety are threatened.'"

    Read more:
    bbc.com/news/articles/c93lqng9
    #FireRetardant #FishKills #Wildfires #Firefighting

  9. Just like with #PFAS-laden #FirefightingFoam, less #Toxic alternatives are out there, but expense is often cited as a roadblock. TBH, things that benefit the environment and society shouldn't cost more than the toxic originals -- and toxic chemicals should be replaced! Period! Make #BigChemical pay! (Since they probably knew about the hazards but hid them from the public. As usual with Big anything these days...!)

    A #PinkPowder is being used to fight #CaliforniaFires. It's getting everywhere

    by Nadine Yousif, January 13, 2025

    "Its use has been controversial in the past over its potential effects on the #environment.

    "A lawsuit filed in 2022 by the #ForestServiceEmployees for #EnvironmentalEthics, an organisation made up of current and former employees of the #USForestService, accused the federal agency of violating the country's clean water laws by dumping #chemical #FireRetardant from planes onto forests.

    "It argued that the chemical kills fish and is not effective.

    "The following year, a US District judge agreed with the employees, but in her ruling allowed the Forest Service to continue using the retardant as it seeks a permit to do so from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    "The case drew the attention of communities devastated by #wildfires in the past, including the town of #ParadiseCalifornia, which was destroyed by fire in 2018.

    "Its then-mayor, Greg Bolin, hailed the judge's ruling, saying it ensures communities 'have a fighting chance' in the face of fires.

    "The Forest Service told NPR that this year, it phased out the use of one type of #PhosChek formula - #PhosChekLC95 - in favour of another - #MVPFx - saying that the latter is less toxic to #wildlife.

    "The Forest Service also has a mandatory ban in place on dropping fire retardant in sensitive environmental areas, like waterways and habitats of endangered species. There are exceptions to the ban, however, in cases 'when human life or public safety are threatened.'"

    Read more:
    bbc.com/news/articles/c93lqng9
    #FireRetardant #FishKills #Wildfires #Firefighting

  10. Just like with #PFAS-laden #FirefightingFoam, less #Toxic alternatives are out there, but expense is often cited as a roadblock. TBH, things that benefit the environment and society shouldn't cost more than the toxic originals -- and toxic chemicals should be replaced! Period! Make #BigChemical pay! (Since they probably knew about the hazards but hid them from the public. As usual with Big anything these days...!)

    A #PinkPowder is being used to fight #CaliforniaFires. It's getting everywhere

    by Nadine Yousif, January 13, 2025

    "Its use has been controversial in the past over its potential effects on the #environment.

    "A lawsuit filed in 2022 by the #ForestServiceEmployees for #EnvironmentalEthics, an organisation made up of current and former employees of the #USForestService, accused the federal agency of violating the country's clean water laws by dumping #chemical #FireRetardant from planes onto forests.

    "It argued that the chemical kills fish and is not effective.

    "The following year, a US District judge agreed with the employees, but in her ruling allowed the Forest Service to continue using the retardant as it seeks a permit to do so from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    "The case drew the attention of communities devastated by #wildfires in the past, including the town of #ParadiseCalifornia, which was destroyed by fire in 2018.

    "Its then-mayor, Greg Bolin, hailed the judge's ruling, saying it ensures communities 'have a fighting chance' in the face of fires.

    "The Forest Service told NPR that this year, it phased out the use of one type of #PhosChek formula - #PhosChekLC95 - in favour of another - #MVPFx - saying that the latter is less toxic to #wildlife.

    "The Forest Service also has a mandatory ban in place on dropping fire retardant in sensitive environmental areas, like waterways and habitats of endangered species. There are exceptions to the ban, however, in cases 'when human life or public safety are threatened.'"

    Read more:
    bbc.com/news/articles/c93lqng9
    #FireRetardant #FishKills #Wildfires #Firefighting

  11. Just like with #PFAS-laden #FirefightingFoam, less #Toxic alternatives are out there, but expense is often cited as a roadblock. TBH, things that benefit the environment and society shouldn't cost more than the toxic originals -- and toxic chemicals should be replaced! Period! Make #BigChemical pay! (Since they probably knew about the hazards but hid them from the public. As usual with Big anything these days...!)

    A #PinkPowder is being used to fight #CaliforniaFires. It's getting everywhere

    by Nadine Yousif, January 13, 2025

    "Its use has been controversial in the past over its potential effects on the #environment.

    "A lawsuit filed in 2022 by the #ForestServiceEmployees for #EnvironmentalEthics, an organisation made up of current and former employees of the #USForestService, accused the federal agency of violating the country's clean water laws by dumping #chemical #FireRetardant from planes onto forests.

    "It argued that the chemical kills fish and is not effective.

    "The following year, a US District judge agreed with the employees, but in her ruling allowed the Forest Service to continue using the retardant as it seeks a permit to do so from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    "The case drew the attention of communities devastated by #wildfires in the past, including the town of #ParadiseCalifornia, which was destroyed by fire in 2018.

    "Its then-mayor, Greg Bolin, hailed the judge's ruling, saying it ensures communities 'have a fighting chance' in the face of fires.

    "The Forest Service told NPR that this year, it phased out the use of one type of #PhosChek formula - #PhosChekLC95 - in favour of another - #MVPFx - saying that the latter is less toxic to #wildlife.

    "The Forest Service also has a mandatory ban in place on dropping fire retardant in sensitive environmental areas, like waterways and habitats of endangered species. There are exceptions to the ban, however, in cases 'when human life or public safety are threatened.'"

    Read more:
    bbc.com/news/articles/c93lqng9
    #FireRetardant #FishKills #Wildfires #Firefighting

  12. Just like with #PFAS-laden #FirefightingFoam, less #Toxic alternatives are out there, but expense is often cited as a roadblock. TBH, things that benefit the environment and society shouldn't cost more than the toxic originals -- and toxic chemicals should be replaced! Period! Make #BigChemical pay! (Since they probably knew about the hazards but hid them from the public. As usual with Big anything these days...!)

    A #PinkPowder is being used to fight #CaliforniaFires. It's getting everywhere

    by Nadine Yousif, January 13, 2025

    "Its use has been controversial in the past over its potential effects on the #environment.

    "A lawsuit filed in 2022 by the #ForestServiceEmployees for #EnvironmentalEthics, an organisation made up of current and former employees of the #USForestService, accused the federal agency of violating the country's clean water laws by dumping #chemical #FireRetardant from planes onto forests.

    "It argued that the chemical kills fish and is not effective.

    "The following year, a US District judge agreed with the employees, but in her ruling allowed the Forest Service to continue using the retardant as it seeks a permit to do so from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    "The case drew the attention of communities devastated by #wildfires in the past, including the town of #ParadiseCalifornia, which was destroyed by fire in 2018.

    "Its then-mayor, Greg Bolin, hailed the judge's ruling, saying it ensures communities 'have a fighting chance' in the face of fires.

    "The Forest Service told NPR that this year, it phased out the use of one type of #PhosChek formula - #PhosChekLC95 - in favour of another - #MVPFx - saying that the latter is less toxic to #wildlife.

    "The Forest Service also has a mandatory ban in place on dropping fire retardant in sensitive environmental areas, like waterways and habitats of endangered species. There are exceptions to the ban, however, in cases 'when human life or public safety are threatened.'"

    Read more:
    bbc.com/news/articles/c93lqng9
    #FireRetardant #FishKills #Wildfires #Firefighting

  13. For my followers in the Davis, California area, mark your calendars for one month from today for a free author event for my book, _The Land Is Our Community: Aldo Leopold’s Environmental Ethic for the New Millennium_ at our local bookstore, the Avid Reader!

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology

  14. New Correspondence Entered into the Twin Metals v. US Docket, Reiterating the Risk of Serious and Irreparable Harm to the Boundary Waters

    The attorney for the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the DOJ just entered this correspondence into the Twin Metals v. US docket.

    It attempts to clarify a point on which the federal government has insisted: since the Forest Service moved to withdraw more than 225,000 acres Superior National Forest lands from mineral exploration and development in September of 2021, the Bureau of Land Management acted lawfully — or with authority — when it denied Twin Metals’ Preference Rights Lease Applications, or PRLAs. Therefore, the government contends, Twin Metals has no claim, so Judge Cooper was right to dismiss Twin Metals’ complaint. (For a little more context, see this post.)

    In response to the Bureau of Land Management’s request for clarification, the Forest Service reiterates its position:

    The record for the 2016 lease consent determination and 2023 withdrawal application demonstrate that development of these mineral resources presented an unacceptable, inherent risk of serious and irreparable harm to the BWCAW natural resources. It has been thoroughly documented that the proposed mineral leasing is not a compatible use within the watershed in such proximity to the wilderness and that the Forest Service’s withholding of consent to the issuance of leases for MNES-057965 and MNES- 050264 would be consistent with the record. This is entirely consistent with previous consent decisions on mineral lease renewals in the same area of the Rainy River Watershed, as well as last year’s decision to withdraw approximately 225,378 acres of land within the watershed from mineral leasing. Extensive analysis and public input associated with prior consent decisions and the mineral withdrawal process informs and supports this response. [emphasis mine]

    There is a to to unpack here, and can’t help but wonder why this correspondence comes at such a late hour. Is the federal government is just making sure to cover all bases, or are there alarm bells ringing? Be that as it may, here are the letters in question.

    BLM Letter to US ForestService re Twin Metals PRLAs 241219Download

    Subscribe

    #ANTO #administrativeState #corruption #environmentalEthics #ethics #lawfulAuthority #pollution #Water

  15. New Correspondence Entered into the Twin Metals v. US Docket, Reiterating the Risk of Serious and Irreparable Harm to the Boundary Waters

    The attorney for the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the DOJ just entered this correspondence into the Twin Metals v. US docket.

    It attempts to clarify a point on which the federal government has insisted: since the Forest Service moved to withdraw more than 225,000 acres Superior National Forest lands from mineral exploration and development in September of 2021, the Bureau of Land Management acted lawfully — or with authority — when it denied Twin Metals’ Preference Rights Lease Applications, or PRLAs. Therefore, the government contends, Twin Metals has no claim, so Judge Cooper was right to dismiss Twin Metals’ complaint. (For a little more context, see this post.)

    In response to the Bureau of Land Management’s request for clarification, the Forest Service reiterates its position:

    The record for the 2016 lease consent determination and 2023 withdrawal application demonstrate that development of these mineral resources presented an unacceptable, inherent risk of serious and irreparable harm to the BWCAW natural resources. It has been thoroughly documented that the proposed mineral leasing is not a compatible use within the watershed in such proximity to the wilderness and that the Forest Service’s withholding of consent to the issuance of leases for MNES-057965 and MNES- 050264 would be consistent with the record. This is entirely consistent with previous consent decisions on mineral lease renewals in the same area of the Rainy River Watershed, as well as last year’s decision to withdraw approximately 225,378 acres of land within the watershed from mineral leasing. Extensive analysis and public input associated with prior consent decisions and the mineral withdrawal process informs and supports this response. [emphasis mine]

    There is a to to unpack here, and can’t help but wonder why this correspondence comes at such a late hour. Is the federal government is just making sure to cover all bases, or are there alarm bells ringing? Be that as it may, here are the letters in question.

    BLM Letter to US ForestService re Twin Metals PRLAs 241219Download

    Subscribe

    #ANTO #administrativeState #corruption #environmentalEthics #ethics #lawfulAuthority #pollution #Water

  16. New Correspondence Entered into the Twin Metals v. US Docket, Reiterating the Risk of Serious and Irreparable Harm to the Boundary Waters

    The attorney for the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the DOJ just entered this correspondence into the Twin Metals v. US docket.

    It attempts to clarify a point on which the federal government has insisted: since the Forest Service moved to withdraw more than 225,000 acres Superior National Forest lands from mineral exploration and development in September of 2021, the Bureau of Land Management acted lawfully — or with authority — when it denied Twin Metals’ Preference Rights Lease Applications, or PRLAs. Therefore, the government contends, Twin Metals has no claim, so Judge Cooper was right to dismiss Twin Metals’ complaint. (For a little more context, see this post.)

    In response to the Bureau of Land Management’s request for clarification, the Forest Service reiterates its position:

    The record for the 2016 lease consent determination and 2023 withdrawal application demonstrate that development of these mineral resources presented an unacceptable, inherent risk of serious and irreparable harm to the BWCAW natural resources. It has been thoroughly documented that the proposed mineral leasing is not a compatible use within the watershed in such proximity to the wilderness and that the Forest Service’s withholding of consent to the issuance of leases for MNES-057965 and MNES- 050264 would be consistent with the record. This is entirely consistent with previous consent decisions on mineral lease renewals in the same area of the Rainy River Watershed, as well as last year’s decision to withdraw approximately 225,378 acres of land within the watershed from mineral leasing. Extensive analysis and public input associated with prior consent decisions and the mineral withdrawal process informs and supports this response. [emphasis mine]

    There is a to to unpack here, and can’t help but wonder why this correspondence comes at such a late hour. Is the federal government is just making sure to cover all bases, or are there alarm bells ringing? Be that as it may, here are the letters in question.

    BLM Letter to US ForestService re Twin Metals PRLAs 241219Download

    Subscribe

    #ANTO #administrativeState #corruption #environmentalEthics #ethics #lawfulAuthority #pollution #Water

  17. New Correspondence Entered into the Twin Metals v. US Docket, Reiterating the Risk of Serious and Irreparable Harm to the Boundary Waters

    The attorney for the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the DOJ just entered this correspondence into the Twin Metals v. US docket.

    It attempts to clarify a point on which the federal government has insisted: since the Forest Service moved to withdraw more than 225,000 acres Superior National Forest lands from mineral exploration and development in September of 2021, the Bureau of Land Management acted lawfully — or with authority — when it denied Twin Metals’ Preference Rights Lease Applications, or PRLAs. Therefore, the government contends, Twin Metals has no claim, so Judge Cooper was right to dismiss Twin Metals’ complaint. (For a little more context, see this post.)

    In response to the Bureau of Land Management’s request for clarification, the Forest Service reiterates its position:

    The record for the 2016 lease consent determination and 2023 withdrawal application demonstrate that development of these mineral resources presented an unacceptable, inherent risk of serious and irreparable harm to the BWCAW natural resources. It has been thoroughly documented that the proposed mineral leasing is not a compatible use within the watershed in such proximity to the wilderness and that the Forest Service’s withholding of consent to the issuance of leases for MNES-057965 and MNES- 050264 would be consistent with the record. This is entirely consistent with previous consent decisions on mineral lease renewals in the same area of the Rainy River Watershed, as well as last year’s decision to withdraw approximately 225,378 acres of land within the watershed from mineral leasing. Extensive analysis and public input associated with prior consent decisions and the mineral withdrawal process informs and supports this response. [emphasis mine]

    There is a to to unpack here, and can’t help but wonder why this correspondence comes at such a late hour. Is the federal government is just making sure to cover all bases, or are there alarm bells ringing? Be that as it may, here are the letters in question.

    BLM Letter to US ForestService re Twin Metals PRLAs 241219Download

    Subscribe

    #ANTO #administrativeState #corruption #environmentalEthics #ethics #lawfulAuthority #pollution #Water

  18. New Correspondence Entered into the Twin Metals v. US Docket, Reiterating the Risk of Serious and Irreparable Harm to the Boundary Waters

    The attorney for the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the DOJ just entered this correspondence into the Twin Metals v. US docket.

    It attempts to clarify a point on which the federal government has insisted: since the Forest Service moved to withdraw more than 225,000 acres Superior National Forest lands from mineral exploration and development in September of 2021, the Bureau of Land Management acted lawfully — or with authority — when it denied Twin Metals’ Preference Rights Lease Applications, or PRLAs. Therefore, the government contends, Twin Metals has no claim, so Judge Cooper was right to dismiss Twin Metals’ complaint. (For a little more context, see this post.)

    In response to the Bureau of Land Management’s request for clarification, the Forest Service reiterates its position:

    The record for the 2016 lease consent determination and 2023 withdrawal application demonstrate that development of these mineral resources presented an unacceptable, inherent risk of serious and irreparable harm to the BWCAW natural resources. It has been thoroughly documented that the proposed mineral leasing is not a compatible use within the watershed in such proximity to the wilderness and that the Forest Service’s withholding of consent to the issuance of leases for MNES-057965 and MNES- 050264 would be consistent with the record. This is entirely consistent with previous consent decisions on mineral lease renewals in the same area of the Rainy River Watershed, as well as last year’s decision to withdraw approximately 225,378 acres of land within the watershed from mineral leasing. Extensive analysis and public input associated with prior consent decisions and the mineral withdrawal process informs and supports this response. [emphasis mine]

    There is a to to unpack here, and can’t help but wonder why this correspondence comes at such a late hour. Is the federal government is just making sure to cover all bases, or are there alarm bells ringing? Be that as it may, here are the letters in question.

    BLM Letter to US ForestService re Twin Metals PRLAs 241219Download

    Subscribe

    #ANTO #administrativeState #corruption #environmentalEthics #ethics #lawfulAuthority #pollution #Water

  19. I have a new paper out in 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘌𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘌𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘴 called "Nativeness as gradient: Towards a more complete value assessment of species in a rapidly changing world"
    (1/3)

    doi.org/10.1007/s10806-024-099

    #ecology #ethics #environmentalethics #biogeography #conservation #anthropocene #climatechange

  20. I am thrilled to read the first (that I am aware of) journal review of my @UChicagoPress book _The Land Is Our Community_. It is thoughtful and generous, and honestly, as much I could have hoped for (review by Samuel McKee for _Philosophy in Review_).

    journals.uvic.ca/index.php/pir

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology
    #PhilSci

  21. Looking forward to my session this Sunday at the Philosophy of Science Association meeting in NOLA! I'm taking a self-reflective look at the methodology I used to develop Leopoldian land ethic policy for my book _The Land Is Our Community_. (What Would Leopold Do? or WWLD).

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology

  22. Hey everyone—I know there's a lot going on right now, but fans of Aldo Leopold's _A Sand County Almanac_ should mark their calendars for this "Science Friday" event on Tuesday, Nov. 19. Curt Meine, Buddy Huffaker, and I will be discussing and taking questions about the book. It should be fun!

    Register here: secure.everyaction.com/g4H0QW1

    Please boost!! ⬆️

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology

  23. I very much enjoyed chatting with the U of Iowa's Prof. Carrie Figdor about my book, _The Land Is Our Community_. You can tell when someone has read your work carefully and is prepared to challenge you on key points! Podcast here:

    podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology

  24. Today is the official publication date of my book—which means #OpenAccess versions are now available.

    ⬇️Download here: bibliopen.org/9780226834474

    Thanks to @UChicagoPress for publishing & @ucdavis Library for funding the open access.

    Please boost!! ⬆️

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology

  25. I donned my @AldoLeopoldFdn shirt in honor of the arrival of my physical copies of _The Land is Our Community_ from @UChicagoPress. I am grateful for the wonderful back-of-cover blurbs from Kim Stanley Robinson, Marion Hourdequin, and Curt Meine.

    #EnvironmentalEthics
    #EnvironmentalHistory
    #PhilBio
    #HPB
    #ConservationBiology
    #Ecology

    press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/b

  26. In honor of the 75th anniversary of Aldo Leopold's _A Sand County Almanac_, the Aldo Leopold Foundation is partnering with environmentalists to share Leopold's writing. Here is my two-minute contribution to this effort, with a passage from "Thinking Like a Mountain" and why it is significant.

    fb.watch/tJ3GaSKo2f/

    #EnvironmentalEthics #EnvironmentalHistory #PhilBio #HPB #ConservationBiology #Ecology

  27. I'm really excited to be giving an overview of my new book for the Aldo Leopold Foundation, aimed at a general audience. All are welcome to logon, watch/listen, and ask questions. We go live on Aug 1, 7 PM CDT (5 PM for me out here on the west coast of the US).

    #EnvironmentalEthics #EnvironmentalHistory #ConservationBiology #Ecology #PhilBio

    crowdcast.io/c/land-community

  28. Looking forward to my presentation at @NACCB2024 #NACCB2024 ! I give a brief overview of how my forthcoming book, The Land Is Our Community, can help resolve a longstanding debate in conservation biology over ecocentrism.

    #ecology #ConservationBiology #EnvironmentalEthics #philbio

  29. Info on my forthcoming book: for cloth/paperback, you can pre-order from U Chicago Press: press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/b — use code UCPNEW for 30% off. The book will be sent when available, probably end of June. For an e-copy, you can wait for the open access version, probably available by the end of July.

    #EnvironmentalEthics #PhilBio #HPB #EnvironmentalHistory #ConservationBiology #Ecology

  30. bsky.app/profile/fgusmao.bsky.

    > "We can no longer take common species for granted... ... it is imperative, too, to give more resources and attention to species we have long thought of as common. If species such as kookaburras and koalas are disappearing, then the threatened species have no hope."
    theconversation.com/why-the-ko

    #Conservation #EnvironmentalEthics #EcoEthics #Philosophy #science

  31. In Move to Protect Whales, Polynesian Indigenous Groups Give Them ‘Personhood’ - The New York Times

    nytimes.com/2024/03/29/world/a

    "#Indigenous leaders of #NewZealand, Tahiti and the Cook Islands signed a historic treaty that recognizes #whales as legal persons in a move conservationists believe will apply pressure to national governments to offer greater protections for the large mammals"

    #ethics #Philosophy #Conservation #EnvironmentalEthics #EcoEthics #whale

  32. 2023 state of the #climate report: Entering uncharted territory

    academic.oup.com/bioscience/ad

    " #Life on planet #Earth is under siege. We are now in an uncharted #territory ... We are entering an unfamiliar domain regarding our #climatecrisis, a situation no one has ever witnessed firsthand in the history of humanity."

    #EnvironmentalEthics #Ecoethics #Ethics #Conservation #Sustainability #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Environment #EnvironmentalHealth #onehealth

  33. #Ecology and #Love

    "My call for love, #hope and #advocacy may be unnerving for some ecologists; may bristle against our deeply ingrained training as objective, #reductionist and dispassionate observers; and may be viewed balefully by #editors who guard against any expression of feeling in their #journals, any hint of doubt about #scientific respectability. ...we are living in a #world besieged by increasing #crisis; we need the courage to #act...".

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/fu

    #EnvironmentalEthics

  34. We are destroying #Pandora...

    All-a-glow: #spectral characteristics confirm widespread #fluorescence for mammals

    "We found that #fluorescence is widespread in mammalian taxa; we identified examples of the phenomena among 125 species representing all 27 living mammalian orders and 79 families"

    #Conservation #EnvironmentalEthics #Ecology #Sustainability #Ecoethics #Threatenedspecies #speciesism #Biology #mammals #Extinction

    royalsocietypublishing.org/doi

  35. #Hypocrisy is threatening the #future of the world’s oceans

    >"None of the 17 #UnitedNations #SustainableDevelopmentGoals (#SDGs) is on track to be achieved by 2030... But progress on a few, including the 14th goal — to conserve and #sustainably use the #oceans — has actually been going backwards since the 2015 UN summit..."

    #SDG14 #acidification #pollution #overfishing #biodiversity #Conservation #MarineScience #UN #EnvironmentalEthics #Ethics #SDG

    @philosophy
    nature.com/articles/d41586-023