#activitypubdev — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #activitypubdev, aggregated by home.social.
-
Slowly developing the in depth testing of the same functionality at different levels in the #GoActivityPub stack.
I have just finished the collection pagination integration test as exposed in the reference server implementation for the library. So we now have the same pagination functionality covered in unit-tests in the different storage backends, also covered by the storage conformance suite, and now, through an integration test in the server application itself.
-
Slowly developing the in depth testing of the same functionality at different levels in the #GoActivityPub stack.
I have just finished the collection pagination integration test as exposed in the reference server implementation for the library. So we now have the same pagination functionality covered in unit-tests in the different storage backends, also covered by the storage conformance suite, and now, through an integration test in the server application itself.
-
Slowly developing the in depth testing of the same functionality at different levels in the #GoActivityPub stack.
I have just finished the collection pagination integration test as exposed in the reference server implementation for the library. So we now have the same pagination functionality covered in unit-tests in the different storage backends, also covered by the storage conformance suite, and now, through an integration test in the server application itself.
-
Slowly developing the in depth testing of the same functionality at different levels in the #GoActivityPub stack.
I have just finished the collection pagination integration test as exposed in the reference server implementation for the library. So we now have the same pagination functionality covered in unit-tests in the different storage backends, also covered by the storage conformance suite, and now, through an integration test in the server application itself.
-
Slowly developing the in depth testing of the same functionality at different levels in the #GoActivityPub stack.
I have just finished the collection pagination integration test as exposed in the reference server implementation for the library. So we now have the same pagination functionality covered in unit-tests in the different storage backends, also covered by the storage conformance suite, and now, through an integration test in the server application itself.
-
When I started the work on ActivityPub projects I fully embraced Maslow's Hammer adage. I wanted as much as possible in my services to go through the #ActivityPub vocabulary and I fully embraced the client to server API.
But there are elements of a web application that require custom functionality no matter what, say changing a password. So for those I just added the capability of running commands through ssh. :goose_hacker:
-
When I started the work on ActivityPub projects I fully embraced Maslow's Hammer adage. I wanted as much as possible in my services to go through the #ActivityPub vocabulary and I fully embraced the client to server API.
But there are elements of a web application that require custom functionality no matter what, say changing a password. So for those I just added the capability of running commands through ssh. :goose_hacker:
-
When I started the work on ActivityPub projects I fully embraced Maslow's Hammer adage. I wanted as much as possible in my services to go through the #ActivityPub vocabulary and I fully embraced the client to server API.
But there are elements of a web application that require custom functionality no matter what, say changing a password. So for those I just added the capability of running commands through ssh. :goose_hacker:
-
When I started the work on ActivityPub projects I fully embraced Maslow's Hammer adage. I wanted as much as possible in my services to go through the #ActivityPub vocabulary and I fully embraced the client to server API.
But there are elements of a web application that require custom functionality no matter what, say changing a password. So for those I just added the capability of running commands through ssh. :goose_hacker:
-
When I started the work on ActivityPub projects I fully embraced Maslow's Hammer adage. I wanted as much as possible in my services to go through the #ActivityPub vocabulary and I fully embraced the client to server API.
But there are elements of a web application that require custom functionality no matter what, say changing a password. So for those I just added the capability of running commands through ssh. :goose_hacker:
-
I'm surprised at how many issues my new integration tests are finding.
I already had an integration testsuite, but the way the #fedbox application was run was not in full isolation, and I expect some of the setup steps I had included don't really exist on a fresh install.
We now build a fresh container image, start it up, provision it with mock data, and then run tests, but only through mechanisms that are available to a prospective server operator: CLI commands executed through SSH, and ActivityPub client to server operations.
-
I'm surprised at how many issues my new integration tests are finding.
I already had an integration testsuite, but the way the #fedbox application was run was not in full isolation, and I expect some of the setup steps I had included don't really exist on a fresh install.
We now build a fresh container image, start it up, provision it with mock data, and then run tests, but only through mechanisms that are available to a prospective server operator: CLI commands executed through SSH, and ActivityPub client to server operations.
-
I'm surprised at how many issues my new integration tests are finding.
I already had an integration testsuite, but the way the #fedbox application was run was not in full isolation, and I expect some of the setup steps I had included don't really exist on a fresh install.
We now build a fresh container image, start it up, provision it with mock data, and then run tests, but only through mechanisms that are available to a prospective server operator: CLI commands executed through SSH, and ActivityPub client to server operations.
-
I'm surprised at how many issues my new integration tests are finding.
I already had an integration testsuite, but the way the #fedbox application was run was not in full isolation, and I expect some of the setup steps I had included don't really exist on a fresh install.
We now build a fresh container image, start it up, provision it with mock data, and then run tests, but only through mechanisms that are available to a prospective server operator: CLI commands executed through SSH, and ActivityPub client to server operations.
-
I'm surprised at how many issues my new integration tests are finding.
I already had an integration testsuite, but the way the #fedbox application was run was not in full isolation, and I expect some of the setup steps I had included don't really exist on a fresh install.
We now build a fresh container image, start it up, provision it with mock data, and then run tests, but only through mechanisms that are available to a prospective server operator: CLI commands executed through SSH, and ActivityPub client to server operations.
-
Oof, the painful long road of fixing concurrency bugs that lie deep into your stack...
-
Oof, the painful long road of fixing concurrency bugs that lie deep into your stack...
-
Oof, the painful long road of fixing concurrency bugs that lie deep into your stack...
-
Oof, the painful long road of fixing concurrency bugs that lie deep into your stack...
-
Oof, the painful long road of fixing concurrency bugs that lie deep into your stack...
-
Does anyone know of a #WordPress hosting company with a free plan that includes the ActivityPub plugin?
I just gave it a try with my FedIAM single sign-on project, and it seems very close to "just working", but it doesn't like my test network very much, so I'd like to give it a try on the live network.
#WordPress #ActivityPubDev #FediDev #FedIAM -
Does anyone know of a #WordPress hosting company with a free plan that includes the ActivityPub plugin?
I just gave it a try with my FedIAM single sign-on project, and it seems very close to "just working", but it doesn't like my test network very much, so I'd like to give it a try on the live network.
#WordPress #ActivityPubDev #FediDev #FedIAM -
Does anyone know of a #WordPress hosting company with a free plan that includes the ActivityPub plugin?
I just gave it a try with my FedIAM single sign-on project, and it seems very close to "just working", but it doesn't like my test network very much, so I'd like to give it a try on the live network.
#WordPress #ActivityPubDev #FediDev #FedIAM -
Does anyone know of a #WordPress hosting company with a free plan that includes the ActivityPub plugin?
I just gave it a try with my FedIAM single sign-on project, and it seems very close to "just working", but it doesn't like my test network very much, so I'd like to give it a try on the live network.
#WordPress #ActivityPubDev #FediDev #FedIAM -
Question about HTTP Signatures in #ActivityPub, IIUC the header is a digest of the HTTP body. Given that JSON is not white-space sensitive, does that mean that storing the response must preserve the indentation used by the server?
-
Question about HTTP Signatures in #ActivityPub, IIUC the header is a digest of the HTTP body. Given that JSON is not white-space sensitive, does that mean that storing the response must preserve the indentation used by the server?
-
Question about HTTP Signatures in #ActivityPub, IIUC the header is a digest of the HTTP body. Given that JSON is not white-space sensitive, does that mean that storing the response must preserve the indentation used by the server?
-
Question about HTTP Signatures in #ActivityPub, IIUC the header is a digest of the HTTP body. Given that JSON is not white-space sensitive, does that mean that storing the response must preserve the indentation used by the server?
-
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
> (Brian Kernighan)Bit hard by this today.
The Rube Goldberg-esque machine of generating HTTP-Signatures and verifying them has become too much for my brain to handle.
Too many elements to keep track of and I'm currently having steam coming out of my ears.
I'll sleep on it...
-
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
> (Brian Kernighan)Bit hard by this today.
The Rube Goldberg-esque machine of generating HTTP-Signatures and verifying them has become too much for my brain to handle.
Too many elements to keep track of and I'm currently having steam coming out of my ears.
I'll sleep on it...
-
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
> (Brian Kernighan)Bit hard by this today.
The Rube Goldberg-esque machine of generating HTTP-Signatures and verifying them has become too much for my brain to handle.
Too many elements to keep track of and I'm currently having steam coming out of my ears.
I'll sleep on it...
-
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
> (Brian Kernighan)Bit hard by this today.
The Rube Goldberg-esque machine of generating HTTP-Signatures and verifying them has become too much for my brain to handle.
Too many elements to keep track of and I'm currently having steam coming out of my ears.
I'll sleep on it...
-
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
> (Brian Kernighan)Bit hard by this today.
The Rube Goldberg-esque machine of generating HTTP-Signatures and verifying them has become too much for my brain to handle.
Too many elements to keep track of and I'm currently having steam coming out of my ears.
I'll sleep on it...
-
I started a private thread between my account and a test actor. The root post was delivered to me (as an Add/Create/Note) and all the objects in the message have:
{
"context": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"contextHistory": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"to": [
"https://zotum.net/lists/17bb4e2e-3149-4803-ad61-b8b8357af703"
],
...
}
But I can't dereference either of these URLs, or any of the object IDs, not even with a signed request. In particular, I can't dereference thetoURL, which means my test actor can't reply to the thread. :(
Should I expect to be able to fetch these? I would have thought a signed GET would work, but it seems not.
Is it worth trying to set up a local Hubzilla instance to test against? I can do this, but I thought asking first might be a lot easier.
#ActivityPubDev #FediDev -
I started a private thread between my account and a test actor. The root post was delivered to me (as an Add/Create/Note) and all the objects in the message have:
{
"context": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"contextHistory": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"to": [
"https://zotum.net/lists/17bb4e2e-3149-4803-ad61-b8b8357af703"
],
...
}
But I can't dereference either of these URLs, or any of the object IDs, not even with a signed request. In particular, I can't dereference thetoURL, which means my test actor can't reply to the thread. :(
Should I expect to be able to fetch these? I would have thought a signed GET would work, but it seems not.
Is it worth trying to set up a local Hubzilla instance to test against? I can do this, but I thought asking first might be a lot easier.
#ActivityPubDev #FediDev -
I started a private thread between my account and a test actor. The root post was delivered to me (as an Add/Create/Note) and all the objects in the message have:
{
"context": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"contextHistory": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"to": [
"https://zotum.net/lists/17bb4e2e-3149-4803-ad61-b8b8357af703"
],
...
}
But I can't dereference either of these URLs, or any of the object IDs, not even with a signed request. In particular, I can't dereference thetoURL, which means my test actor can't reply to the thread. :(
Should I expect to be able to fetch these? I would have thought a signed GET would work, but it seems not.
Is it worth trying to set up a local Hubzilla instance to test against? I can do this, but I thought asking first might be a lot easier.
#ActivityPubDev #FediDev -
I started a private thread between my account and a test actor. The root post was delivered to me (as an Add/Create/Note) and all the objects in the message have:
{
"context": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"contextHistory": "https://zotum.net/conversation/2ffbd4e4-6197-4922-98ec-bedd4108679d",
"to": [
"https://zotum.net/lists/17bb4e2e-3149-4803-ad61-b8b8357af703"
],
...
}
But I can't dereference either of these URLs, or any of the object IDs, not even with a signed request. In particular, I can't dereference thetoURL, which means my test actor can't reply to the thread. :(
Should I expect to be able to fetch these? I would have thought a signed GET would work, but it seems not.
Is it worth trying to set up a local Hubzilla instance to test against? I can do this, but I thought asking first might be a lot easier.
#ActivityPubDev #FediDev -
So on my ONI instance that I've been use as an alternative fediverse profile for myself for about two years, the full storage used is about 3.4G, but out of that there's 2.5G containing mostly the Delete activities of mastodon.social. Crazy.
-
So on my ONI instance that I've been use as an alternative fediverse profile for myself for about two years, the full storage used is about 3.4G, but out of that there's 2.5G containing mostly the Delete activities of mastodon.social. Crazy.
-
So on my ONI instance that I've been use as an alternative fediverse profile for myself for about two years, the full storage used is about 3.4G, but out of that there's 2.5G containing mostly the Delete activities of mastodon.social. Crazy.
-
So on my ONI instance that I've been use as an alternative fediverse profile for myself for about two years, the full storage used is about 3.4G, but out of that there's 2.5G containing mostly the Delete activities of mastodon.social. Crazy.
-
So on my ONI instance that I've been use as an alternative fediverse profile for myself for about two years, the full storage used is about 3.4G, but out of that there's 2.5G containing mostly the Delete activities of mastodon.social. Crazy.
-
I've started working on generating RFC9421 compatible HTTP-Signatures in #GoActivityPub about a week and a half ago, but it felt more like a month.
Writing tests for the client module took the bulk of this time and it was a proper slog. We did manage to increase code coverage from under 20% to 80% plus.
This makes it a bit harder to migrate to a new API when the future version 1 of the library will be tagged, but the changes I have planned shouldn't be insurmountable.
Now I just need to implement the verification, and I'll be done with what is a very large milestone for the library. :goose_hacker:
-
I've started working on generating RFC9421 compatible HTTP-Signatures in #GoActivityPub about a week and a half ago, but it felt more like a month.
Writing tests for the client module took the bulk of this time and it was a proper slog. We did manage to increase code coverage from under 20% to 80% plus.
This makes it a bit harder to migrate to a new API when the future version 1 of the library will be tagged, but the changes I have planned shouldn't be insurmountable.
Now I just need to implement the verification, and I'll be done with what is a very large milestone for the library. :goose_hacker:
-
I've started working on generating RFC9421 compatible HTTP-Signatures in #GoActivityPub about a week and a half ago, but it felt more like a month.
Writing tests for the client module took the bulk of this time and it was a proper slog. We did manage to increase code coverage from under 20% to 80% plus.
This makes it a bit harder to migrate to a new API when the future version 1 of the library will be tagged, but the changes I have planned shouldn't be insurmountable.
Now I just need to implement the verification, and I'll be done with what is a very large milestone for the library. :goose_hacker:
-
I've started working on generating RFC9421 compatible HTTP-Signatures in #GoActivityPub about a week and a half ago, but it felt more like a month.
Writing tests for the client module took the bulk of this time and it was a proper slog. We did manage to increase code coverage from under 20% to 80% plus.
This makes it a bit harder to migrate to a new API when the future version 1 of the library will be tagged, but the changes I have planned shouldn't be insurmountable.
Now I just need to implement the verification, and I'll be done with what is a very large milestone for the library. :goose_hacker:
-
I've started working on generating RFC9421 compatible HTTP-Signatures in #GoActivityPub about a week and a half ago, but it felt more like a month.
Writing tests for the client module took the bulk of this time and it was a proper slog. We did manage to increase code coverage from under 20% to 80% plus.
This makes it a bit harder to migrate to a new API when the future version 1 of the library will be tagged, but the changes I have planned shouldn't be insurmountable.
Now I just need to implement the verification, and I'll be done with what is a very large milestone for the library. :goose_hacker:
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
-
@julian regarding #FEP7888 the as:context property is non-functional, so an array of contexts is allowed. do you accept that or do you throw an http 500 ;-) and do you know if others can hanlde an context array ? #activitypub #activitypubdev
-
@julian regarding #FEP7888 the as:context property is non-functional, so an array of contexts is allowed. do you accept that or do you throw an http 500 ;-) and do you know if others can hanlde an context array ? #activitypub #activitypubdev
-
@julian regarding #FEP7888 the as:context property is non-functional, so an array of contexts is allowed. do you accept that or do you throw an http 500 ;-) and do you know if others can hanlde an context array ? #activitypub #activitypubdev
-
@julian regarding #FEP7888 the as:context property is non-functional, so an array of contexts is allowed. do you accept that or do you throw an http 500 ;-) and do you know if others can hanlde an context array ? #activitypub #activitypubdev
-
@julian regarding #FEP7888 the as:context property is non-functional, so an array of contexts is allowed. do you accept that or do you throw an http 500 ;-) and do you know if others can hanlde an context array ? #activitypub #activitypubdev
-
If you're trying to dereference all RDF namespaces found in the #ActivityStreams JSON-LD document you must first download the internet.
Now downloading google.com...
-
If you're trying to dereference all RDF namespaces found in the #ActivityStreams JSON-LD document you must first download the internet.
Now downloading google.com...
-
If you're trying to dereference all RDF namespaces found in the #ActivityStreams JSON-LD document you must first download the internet.
Now downloading google.com...