home.social

Search

329 results for “tnsaf”

  1. 🔴 #A7Radio > #Sport > #TNAFinalResolution
    buff.ly/4fkcvjI

    📌 On termine avec le match pour le World Heavyweight Championship !
    Nic Nemeth affronte AJ Francis.

    Pas vraiment de suspense même si le match est bon. Le Champion se débarrasse de son adversaire en 20 minutes. Joe Hendry a été attentif ! #Andstill

    ⭐ Commente avec nous 😀

    #World #Music #A7Radio #Streaming #Catch #Wrestling #Fedicatch #Highlights #Rewatch #TNAImpact #Sports #Tv #React #Debrief #Medias

  2. 🔴 #A7Radio > #Sport > #TNAFinalResolution
    buff.ly/4fkcvjI

    📌 On passe au TNA Tag Team Championship défendus dans un table match !
    Les Hardys (c) affrontent The System.

    Un incident à lei avec un spectateur, rapidement évacué.
    The system mène le match avant que les Hardys s'occupent d'eux. #Andstill

    ⭐ Commente avec nous 😀

    #World #Music #A7Radio #Streaming #Catch #Wrestling #Fedicatch #Highlights #Rewatch #TNAImpact #Sports #Tv #React #Debrief #Medias

  3. 🔴 #A7Radio > #Sport > #TNAFinalResolution
    buff.ly/4fkcvjI

    📌 Joe Hendry décroche son match pour le TNA World CHampionship !
    It's Time to give this Title !

    Une nouvelle défaite mettrait un terme définitif à son personnage. Et vu la popularité qu'il a depuis un moment.. c'est sa dernière chance !

    ⭐ Commente avec nous 😀

    #World #Music #A7Radio #Streaming #Catch #Wrestling #Fedicatch #Highlights #Rewatch #TNAImpact #Sports #Tv #React #Debrief #Medias

  4. 🔴 #A7Radio > #Sport > #TNAFinalResolution
    buff.ly/4fkcvjI

    📌 Autre Event du week-end avec 4 Championnats mis en jeu !
    On perd pas de temps avec le X Division Title Match !

    Moose (c) parvient à conserver son titre contre Kushida ! #AndStill

    ⭐ Commente avec nous 😀

    #World #Music #A7Radio #Streaming #Catch #Wrestling #Fedicatch #Highlights #Rewatch #TNAImpact #Sports #Tv #React #Debrief #Medias

  5. #Tesafilm tauchte zum ersten Mal im Protokoll der 37. Sitzung des 21. Deutschen Bundestages am 06.11.2025 auf. Es wurde im Rahmen der Rede von Evelyn Schötz (DIE LINKE) gesagt.

    Video: de.openparliament.tv/media/DE-

  6. Comment la montre connectée aide-t-elle les adeptes du trail à optimiser leurs performances ? dlvr.it/TNsNf3 #montreconnectée #trailrunning




  7. From 2026-5-13

    An opinion piece from a right-wing publication [National Post]
    Talking about testimony from 2026-5-7.
    MSM has been mostly avoiding this issue, perhaps they do not really understand the topic.

    I generally try to avoid any opinion from the NP - just posting this toot to suggest that the right-wingers don't seem to like C22 either.

    "Bill C-22 could force tech companies to allow police to eavesdrop through phones and smart speakers"
    nationalpost.com/opinion/new-b




  8. "How Much Further Will Lawful Access Go?: Police Chief Tells Bill C-22 Hearing That Three Years of Metadata Retention Would Be 'Ideal'"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/c22met

    Quote: "... Sahota acknowledged that police would likely support an even broader scope, describing C-22 as a first step.
    Sahota said the government needed to get the bill passed to take further steps and added that she was open to going further."

    Quote: "Asked whether one year was the appropriate retention period, Darcy Fleury, Chief of Police in Thunder Bay, told MPs:
    'I think 12 months is a good start but obviously, yes, you're right, if the investigations are prolonged, and they can be very long in some of these cases, then retention beyond the 12 months - 24 months, 36 months, would be ideal.'"




  9. "How Much Further Will Lawful Access Go?: Police Chief Tells Bill C-22 Hearing That Three Years of Metadata Retention Would Be 'Ideal'"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/c22met

    Quote: "Some tend to claim that criticism of lawful access veers into conspiracy theories about government surveillance.
    Yet no one is trying to hide anything here: the government says lawful access is a first step and that it is prepared to go further, while the police state on the record at committee that years of metadata retention would be ideal.
    If the government follows through, Canada would have the most extensive (and most expensive) mandated metadata retention regime in the world."

    IMO retaining all of that data for that long a period is going to cost companies a fortune and the costs will be passed to the customers.




  10. From 2026-5-10 an article written by someone from the Canadain Press

    "Bill to help authorities probe online activities raises widespread privacy fears"
    ctvnews.ca/politics/article/bi

    Quote: "A Liberal government bill [C22] that would make it easier for police and spies to navigate the online world is running into fierce opposition from major digital companies, civil liberties groups and law professors who say it would open the door to serious privacy infringements."

    IMO the article does not stress how invasive and dangerous C22 could be.




  11. Here is a great post from 2012 by Michael Geist about [what they call] lawful access.
    With respect to Bill C22: We have been here before and the pathetic arguments from 2012 and 2026 are similar.

    Maybe ask @OpenMediaOrg if they would repost some old article from 2012.

    If by some miracle Bill C22 is stopped then it will resurface some time in the future.
    The struggle to preserve Charter rights and freedoms will never end.

    The spooks and the cops just won't give up on this issue.
    IMO Since 2012 Canada has not become a lawless and unsafe country due to a lack of snooping.

    "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Lawful Access, But Were (Understandably) Afraid To Ask"
    michaelgeist.ca/2012/02/lawful




  12. Here is a great post from 2009 by Michael Geist about [what they call] lawful access.
    With respect to Bill C22: We have been here before and the pathetic arguments from 2009, 2012 and 2026 are similar.

    "Van Loan's Misleading Claims: Case For Lawful Access Not Closed"
    michaelgeist.ca/2009/09/lawful




  13. From 2025-4-8

    "The Backdoor Rebrand: 'Lawful Access' Is Still a Threat to Encryption
    It's Deja Vu All Over Again!"
    jirif.substack.com/p/the-backd

    Quote: "There's no such thing as a backdoor only law enforcement can use.
    Once you create a privileged access pathway, you've created an attack vector.
    And if governments can get in, so can others - eventually and inevitably."

    Quote: "The “Balanced Solutions” Pipe Dream
    Let's be really clear about this:

    - You cannot have strong encryption with selective access.
    - You cannot protect fundamental rights by compromising the technology that enforces them.
    - You cannot call it privacy if someone else holds a key.

    The idea of a 'balanced' or 'lawful' backdoor is as illogical as a fireproof matchstick."
    [End Quote]

    I encourage people to read the entire article.




  14. From 2026-5-1, a perspective that spooks all ofthe the world seem to love the concept of 'lawful access'.

    "From 'encryption backdoor' to 'lawful access' - is a compromise between privacy, security, and law enforcement needs actually possible?"
    [Not in my opinion]
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    Quote: "When privacy advocates thought they had won the Crypto Wars in the 1990s, they probably wouldn't have guessed they'd still be discussing whether decrypting private data is a bad or good idea 30 years later. But since at least 2020, a stream of governments have been trying to create a backdoor to encryption under the new name of 'lawful access'."

    IMO 30 years from now it will still be around but it might have a different slogan.




  15. The is starting to get ugly.

    2026-3-10

    "Australia's age verification rules: Is a VPN ban on the horizon?"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-3-18

    "Chat Control: EU Parliament said no to Big Tech mass surveillance of your chats — but the battle for privacy isn't done"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-3-20

    "The UK doesn't want to force you to have a digital ID - but a 'trust me bro' approach won't make the cut"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-5-10
    "Australia's 'Swiss cheese-like age verification' may lead to a VPN ban — and the whole country's digital safety is on the line"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-5-11
    "From essential security tools to restricted circumvention software: The EU signals that VPNs are the next target following the release of its age verification app"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-




  16. The is starting to get ugly.

    First Signal now Windscribe.

    2026-5-15
    "Windscribe [VPN provider] joins Signal in threatening Canada exit over controversial surveillance bill"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    Canadians could be without VPNs if C22 is passed.

  17. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Smartphone
    #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    The #WarOnVPNs is starting to get ugly.

    2026-3-10

    "Australia's age verification rules: Is a VPN ban on the horizon?"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-3-18

    "Chat Control: EU Parliament said no to Big Tech mass surveillance of your chats — but the battle for privacy isn't done"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-3-20

    "The UK doesn't want to force you to have a digital ID - but a 'trust me bro' approach won't make the cut"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-5-10
    "Australia's 'Swiss cheese-like age verification' may lead to a VPN ban — and the whole country's digital safety is on the line"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    2026-5-11
    "From essential security tools to restricted circumvention software: The EU signals that VPNs are the next target following the release of its age verification app"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

  18. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Smartphone
    #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-1, a perspective that spooks all ofthe the world seem to love the concept of 'lawful access'.

    "From 'encryption backdoor' to 'lawful access' - is a compromise between privacy, security, and law enforcement needs actually possible?"
    [Not in my opinion]
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    Quote: "When privacy advocates thought they had won the Crypto Wars in the 1990s, they probably wouldn't have guessed they'd still be discussing whether decrypting private data is a bad or good idea 30 years later. But since at least 2020, a stream of governments have been trying to create a backdoor to encryption under the new name of 'lawful access'."

    IMO 30 years from now it will still be around but it might have a different slogan.

  19. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Smartphone
    #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2025-4-8

    "The Backdoor Rebrand: 'Lawful Access' Is Still a Threat to Encryption
    It's Deja Vu All Over Again!"
    jirif.substack.com/p/the-backd

    Quote: "There's no such thing as a backdoor only law enforcement can use.
    Once you create a privileged access pathway, you've created an attack vector.
    And if governments can get in, so can others - eventually and inevitably."

    Quote: "The “Balanced Solutions” Pipe Dream
    Let's be really clear about this:

    - You cannot have strong encryption with selective access.
    - You cannot protect fundamental rights by compromising the technology that enforces them.
    - You cannot call it privacy if someone else holds a key.

    The idea of a 'balanced' or 'lawful' backdoor is as illogical as a fireproof matchstick."
    [End Quote]

    I encourage people to read the entire article.

  20. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Smartphone
    #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    Here is a great post from 2009 by Michael Geist about [what they call] lawful access.
    With respect to Bill C22: We have been here before and the pathetic arguments from 2009, 2012 and 2026 are similar.

    "Van Loan's Misleading Claims: Case For Lawful Access Not Closed"
    michaelgeist.ca/2009/09/lawful

  21. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Smartphone
    #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    Here is a great post from 2012 by Michael Geist about [what they call] lawful access.
    With respect to Bill C22: We have been here before and the pathetic arguments from 2012 and 2026 are similar.

    Maybe ask @OpenMediaOrg if they would repost some old article from 2012.

    If by some miracle Bill C22 is stopped then it will resurface some time in the future.
    The struggle to preserve Charter rights and freedoms will never end.

    The spooks and the cops just won't give up on this issue.
    IMO Since 2012 Canada has not become a lawless and unsafe country due to a lack of snooping.

    "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Lawful Access, But Were (Understandably) Afraid To Ask"
    michaelgeist.ca/2012/02/lawful

  22. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Smartphone
    #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-13

    An opinion piece from a right-wing publication [National Post]
    Talking about testimony from 2026-5-7.
    MSM has been mostly avoiding this issue, perhaps they do not really understand the topic.

    I generally try to avoid any opinion from the NP - just posting this toot to suggest that the right-wingers don't seem to like C22 either.

    "Bill C-22 could force tech companies to allow police to eavesdrop through phones and smart speakers"
    nationalpost.com/opinion/new-b