home.social

Search

417 results for “tnsaf”

  1. @tnsaf ever since #PP got in and started the usualy Con whining!

    #pp
  2. RE: techhub.social/@tnsaf/11659224

    #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    NordVPN is one of the largest and most popular VPNs in the world.
    One by one it looks like all of the VPNs are considering pulling out of Canada if C22 passes.

    Canada might have 20M users tops while those companies have so many more users world-wide.
    Most of those people would drop any VPN provider that complied with C22.

    It would be financial suicude for any company to risk that many customers just for Canada.

    At the rate we are going there won't be one reliable VPN provider available to Canadians if C22 passes.

    A Canadian internet without reliable VPNs would be like setting the clock back 40 years and likely might not be safe for anyone.
    Might be the end of work from home forever.

    If your concerned then sign the petition at
    action.openmedia.org/page/1887

  3. @tnsaf

    Good bye.

    Get in your car. Take all the land you brought into Canada with you when you came, and get the hell out.

    Hurry now, were getting eager to see the back of you

    Dont think you're coming back.

    Get out.

    #canpoli #alberta #byebye #busTicket

  4. RE: mstdn.ca/@tnsaf/11655820829903

    Even @signalapp #Signal says they'd pull out of Canada. This is #ChatControl Canadian-style a d it's a liberal nightmare. This'll be another nail in the lib coffin next election cycle.

  5. RE: mstdn.ca/@tnsaf/11655820829903

    Even @signalapp #Signal says they'd pull out of Canada. This is #ChatControl Canadian-style a d it's a liberal nightmare. This'll be another nail in the lib coffin next election cycle.

  6. RE: mstdn.ca/@tnsaf/11655820829903

    Even @signalapp #Signal says they'd pull out of Canada. This is #ChatControl Canadian-style a d it's a liberal nightmare. This'll be another nail in the lib coffin next election cycle.



  7. From 2026-5-28

    Here is a link to meeting 39 (4th on Bill C22) that happened on 2026-5-28.
    It seems to be stacked with proponents of the bill,
    no pricvacy or info security experts.
    ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/e

  8. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-28

    Here is a link to meeting 39 (4th on Bill C22) that happened on 2026-5-28.
    It seems to be stacked with proponents of the bill,
    no pricvacy or info security experts.
    ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/e



  9. From 2026-5-28

    "More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/more-m

    Quote:
    "The political pressure against Bill C-22 has been steadily mounting, with the opposition parties, tech companies, and privacy experts all increasingly vocal about the need for significant amendments.

    At this stage, it seems all the government has in response are misleading or inaccurate claims with little in the way of an actual defence.

    Indeed, the government's disregard for facts and privacy is fast becoming Bill C-22's legacy."

  10. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-28

    "More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/more-m

    Quote:
    "The political pressure against Bill C-22 has been steadily mounting, with the opposition parties, tech companies, and privacy experts all increasingly vocal about the need for significant amendments.

    At this stage, it seems all the government has in response are misleading or inaccurate claims with little in the way of an actual defence.

    Indeed, the government's disregard for facts and privacy is fast becoming Bill C-22's legacy."



  11. From 2026-5-28

    "More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/more-m

    Quote
    "The term 'systemic vulnerability' is not defined in the statute, and the Governor in Council has the power to make regulations 'respecting the meaning of any term or expression for the purposes of this Act.'

    None of this is fixed by promising clearer language.

    It is fixed by the kind of amendment the Privacy Commissioner proposed this week, namely adopting Australia's definition, which expressly covers actions that render encryption less effective, together with an explicit prohibition on regulations or orders that require the introduction of, or prevent the rectification of, a systemic vulnerability."

  12. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-28

    "More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/more-m

    Quote
    "The term 'systemic vulnerability' is not defined in the statute, and the Governor in Council has the power to make regulations 'respecting the meaning of any term or expression for the purposes of this Act.'

    None of this is fixed by promising clearer language.

    It is fixed by the kind of amendment the Privacy Commissioner proposed this week, namely adopting Australia's definition, which expressly covers actions that render encryption less effective, together with an explicit prohibition on regulations or orders that require the introduction of, or prevent the rectification of, a systemic vulnerability."



  13. From 2026-5-28

    "More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/more-m

    Quote
    "On encryption, Anandasangaree said the bill 'was never meant to breach encryption' and promised to 'clarify it in the Bill.'

    The safeguards in Bill C-22 at ss. 5(5) and 7(5), which state that a provider is not required to comply if compliance would create a systemic vulnerability, are incompatible with s. 12, which unconditionally requires compliance with orders, and with s. 13, which specifies that orders prevail over regulations when inconsistencies arise.

    The term 'systemic vulnerability' is not defined in the statute, and the Governor in Council has the power to make regulations 'respecting the meaning of any term or expression for the purposes of this Act.'
    None of this is fixed by promising clearer language."

  14. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-28

    "More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/more-m

    Quote
    "On encryption, Anandasangaree said the bill 'was never meant to breach encryption' and promised to 'clarify it in the Bill.'

    The safeguards in Bill C-22 at ss. 5(5) and 7(5), which state that a provider is not required to comply if compliance would create a systemic vulnerability, are incompatible with s. 12, which unconditionally requires compliance with orders, and with s. 13, which specifies that orders prevail over regulations when inconsistencies arise.

    The term 'systemic vulnerability' is not defined in the statute, and the Governor in Council has the power to make regulations 'respecting the meaning of any term or expression for the purposes of this Act.'
    None of this is fixed by promising clearer language."



  15. From 2026-5-28

    "The Phony Phone Book Analogy: How Liberal Cabinet Ministers and MPs are Misleading Canadians About the Privacy Risks of Bill C-22"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/the-ph

    Quotes:
    "The phony phone book claim is not limited to cabinet ministers."

    "If this sounds familiar, it is because the same tired claims have been used for years."

    "Moreover, the same phony framing is now being stretched beyond subscriber data to mandatory metadata retention."

    "What Parliament has heard instead, from two ministers down through the back bench, is a recycled talking point from a decade-old debate the Supreme Court firmly rejected."

    I recommend reading the entire article.

  16. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-28

    "The Phony Phone Book Analogy: How Liberal Cabinet Ministers and MPs are Misleading Canadians About the Privacy Risks of Bill C-22"
    michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/the-ph

    Quotes:
    "The phony phone book claim is not limited to cabinet ministers."

    "If this sounds familiar, it is because the same tired claims have been used for years."

    "Moreover, the same phony framing is now being stretched beyond subscriber data to mandatory metadata retention."

    "What Parliament has heard instead, from two ministers down through the back bench, is a recycled talking point from a decade-old debate the Supreme Court firmly rejected."

    I recommend reading the entire article.



  17. From 2026-5-28

    "Canada [Gov] vows to amend Bill C-22's encryption and metadata rules amid massive tech backlash"
    "Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says the government will clarify how the lawful access bill impacts encryption, but insists the legislation 'needs to happen'"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    I suspect that any ammedments would be minor and would do nothing to address concerns of privacy advocates.

    IMO what needs to happen is a Charter challenge in court.

  18. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-28

    "Canada [Gov] vows to amend Bill C-22's encryption and metadata rules amid massive tech backlash"
    "Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says the government will clarify how the lawful access bill impacts encryption, but insists the legislation 'needs to happen'"
    techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-

    I suspect that any ammedments would be minor and would do nothing to address concerns of privacy advocates.

    IMO what needs to happen is a Charter challenge in court.

  19. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-26

    "Conservatives look to limit government powers in Liberals' controversial lawful access bill"
    cbc.ca/news/politics/lawful-ac

    Quote:
    "Federal Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne testified Tuesday afternoon that he was consulted by the government after their first attempt at bringing in a lawful access bill, Bill C-2, folded under backlash.
    It was amended and reintroduced as Bill C-22 earlier this year.

    'There remain privacy concerns,' he told the committee.

    Dufresne put forward eight recommendations, including narrowing the definition of subscriber information to just names, addresses, telephone numbers and IP addresses, and limiting the entities who would be compelled to provide that information to telecommunications service providers.

    He also said the bill's technical obligations on electronic providers should 'be limited to what is necessary and proportionate.'"

  20. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    From 2026-5-25

    "Bill C-22: The Privacy Battle Behind Canada's New Lawful Access Bill"
    remiellaw.ca/post/bill-c-22-th

    Quote:
    "Secure systems are widely used by:

    - Journalists
    - Lawyers and legal professionals
    - Businesses handling confidential information
    - Human rights organizations
    - Researchers
    - Political actors
    - Domestic violence support organizations
    - Whistleblowers

    Critics argue that confidence in secure communications becomes especially important for these groups."

  21. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    The next meeting about Bill C22 with the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security is schedule for Tue May 26
    (about 4 hours total)

    ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SE

    Previous meetings

    Thur May 7 (about 4 hours)
    Tue May 5 (about 2 hours)

    So that's about 10 hours total in committee for a bill that will drastically change privacy for all Canadians.

    Of that time at least 50% was allocated by proponents of the bill.
    So only about 5 hours total is to be allocated for privacy advocates?

    IMO that looks like a gov trying to ram an unpoplar bill through and send it to the [rubber-stamp] Senate.

    There is still time [but not much] to contact your MP.

    IMO, considering how little time has been given to public discussion, C22 should be scrapped and start over but next time begin by gathering meaningful input from the public.

  22. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    The next meeting about Bill C22 with the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security is schedule for Tue May 26
    (about 4 hours total)

    ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SE

    Previous meetings

    Thur May 7 (about 4 hours)
    Tue May 5 (about 2 hours)

    So that's about 10 hours total in committee for a bill that will drastically change privacy for all Canadians.

    Of that time at least 50% was allocated by proponents of the bill.
    So only about 5 hours total is to be allocated for privacy advocates?

    IMO that looks like a gov trying to ram an unpoplar bill through and send it to the [rubber-stamp] Senate.

    There is still time [but not much] to contact your MP.

    IMO, considering how little time has been given to public discussion, C22 should be scrapped and start over but next time begin by gathering meaningful input from the public.

  23. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    The next meeting about Bill C22 with the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security is schedule for Tue May 26
    (about 4 hours total)

    ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SE

    Previous meetings

    Thur May 7 (about 4 hours)
    Tue May 5 (about 2 hours)

    So that's about 10 hours total in committee for a bill that will drastically change privacy for all Canadians.

    Of that time at least 50% was allocated by proponents of the bill.
    So only about 5 hours total is to be allocated for privacy advocates?

    IMO that looks like a gov trying to ram an unpoplar bill through and send it to the [rubber-stamp] Senate.

    There is still time [but not much] to contact your MP.

    IMO, considering how little time has been given to public discussion, C22 should be scrapped and start over but next time begin by gathering meaningful input from the public.

  24. #BillC22 #KillBillC22 #StopBillC22 #CdnPoli
    #Surviellance #Internet #Technology
    #LawlessAccess

    The next meeting about Bill C22 with the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security is schedule for Tue May 26
    (about 4 hours total)

    ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SE

    Previous meetings

    Thur May 7 (about 4 hours)
    Tue May 5 (about 2 hours)

    So that's about 10 hours total in committee for a bill that will drastically change privacy for all Canadians.

    Of that time at least 50% was allocated by proponents of the bill.
    So only about 5 hours total is to be allocated for privacy advocates?

    IMO that looks like a gov trying to ram an unpoplar bill through and send it to the [rubber-stamp] Senate.

    There is still time [but not much] to contact your MP.

    IMO, considering how little time has been given to public discussion, C22 should be scrapped and start over but next time begin by gathering meaningful input from the public.