#plustek — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #plustek, aggregated by home.social.
-
Finally bought a #Plustek #OpticFilm7300 to properly digitize my home-developed films.
After struggling for a good two hours to get the old SilverFast version to work on my neglected #Windows installation (and finally giving up), I thought I’d give it a try on my #Debian setup. Opened #Skanlite and … simply scanned the negatives. It just worked:
https://pixelfed.de/c/992065695823922169Scanned as TIFs and edited in #Darktable.
-
#scanning #tips #software
The final two pieces of software are proprietary: Plustek's scanning software, and Hamrick's #VueScan (which is cross-platform, but I use it on Windows currently).
#plustek's config/scanning tool is really good at scanning & splitting things for you- I've used this extensively for smaller magazines, manuals, and pamphlets. It's quick & effective.
#VueScan is my current go-to for book/magazine scanning (anything that's printed to the edge). It's really good at this, and absolutely trash at any document that needs to be split- I try every so often, and just find I've wasted an hour trying to get it to work. -
#scanning A little about the scanners themselves that I've used:
#Canon CanoScan LiDE 300- this is a solid workhorse under Linux, and is what I used for quite a long term to do a wide variety of scans. I've used Gnome Document Scanner, KDE Skanlite & Skanpage with this.
#Plustek OpticSlim 2680H- picked this up as a "parts only" thing, and got lucky there. This is absolutely amazing when you have a magazine/brochure/pamphlet that fits open on the glass
#microtek XT3300- this is my book edge scanner (was cheaper than a Plustek OpticBook at the time). -
I've taken one old (1986/87) roll of film and scanned it with both the #Easy35 and with a #Plustek OpticFilm 8200i.
For a lot of the frames, there’s little important difference to my eye, but there are some things I see:
* The Plustek's frame holder can clip edges of frame. (See the cat photo. Excuse the mismatched exposure.)
* The Easy35 frames have some stray light. (This roll was pretty curly width-wise.) Only *obvious* (to me) in certain cases, but surely a factor.
-
After working with Ed Hamrick, the originator of Vuescan, I have decided to return my #Plustek OpticFilm 8200i. Luckily this should be fine, as I am (just!) within the 14 day period from the UK Consumer Contracts regs 2013 (replaced the old EU Distance Selling regs). I have requested a returns code from the seller, packed it all up after photoing every bit. Silverfast have removed the associated licence from my account. Hoping my 7500i comes to life again!
-
Last night I scanned a 24-frame roll of #Kentmere 100. It was a nightmare! #Vuescan was showing the skies as out of gamut! It's possible my #Plustek 7500i (bought in 2011) is in its death spiral, but I'm also wondering if I set the EI to 400 rather than 100 (the previous film was at EI 250, and I make have changed it without glasses). The negatives look very dense... annoyingly, there is a second film to come using the same EI. 😞