#philscidon — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #philscidon, aggregated by home.social.
-
If I were to say that the primary benefit of randomization (and possibly blinding) is that it makes simple statistical models match the true data generating process quite well, would that be a provocative statement? Or would that be obvious? Is there a good reference for this line of reasoning?
-
If I were to say that the primary benefit of randomization (and possibly blinding) is that it makes simple statistical models match the true data generating process quite well, would that be a provocative statement? Or would that be obvious? Is there a good reference for this line of reasoning?
-
If I were to say that the primary benefit of randomization (and possibly blinding) is that it makes simple statistical models match the true data generating process quite well, would that be a provocative statement? Or would that be obvious? Is there a good reference for this line of reasoning?
-
If I were to say that the primary benefit of randomization (and possibly blinding) is that it makes simple statistical models match the true data generating process quite well, would that be a provocative statement? Or would that be obvious? Is there a good reference for this line of reasoning?
-
If I were to say that the primary benefit of randomization (and possibly blinding) is that it makes simple statistical models match the true data generating process quite well, would that be a provocative statement? Or would that be obvious? Is there a good reference for this line of reasoning?
-
Crypto-positivism:
“A central dimension of our argument is that many of the tenets of positivism are so embedded within Western culture, academia, and the world of education in particular that they are often invisible to researchers and those who consume their research.”
Kincheloe and Tobin (2015): https://doi.org/10.1163/9789463000765_003
#PhilosophyOfScience
#PhilSci
#PhilScidon
@philosophy
#Positivism -
Crypto-positivism:
“A central dimension of our argument is that many of the tenets of positivism are so embedded within Western culture, academia, and the world of education in particular that they are often invisible to researchers and those who consume their research.”
Kincheloe and Tobin (2015): https://doi.org/10.1163/9789463000765_003
#PhilosophyOfScience
#PhilSci
#PhilScidon
@philosophy
#Positivism -
Philosophers here definitely need a proper Mastodon hashtag like #histodon and #mathstodon folks have. So far I've seen #philscidon, but not #philodon or #philosodon. Is there any such hashtag in other instances? If not, which one should we use?
-
Philosophers here definitely need a proper Mastodon hashtag like #histodon and #mathstodon folks have. So far I've seen #philscidon, but not #philodon or #philosodon. Is there any such hashtag in other instances? If not, which one should we use?
-
Philosophers here definitely need a proper Mastodon hashtag like #histodon and #mathstodon folks have. So far I've seen #philscidon, but not #philodon or #philosodon. Is there any such hashtag in other instances? If not, which one should we use?
-
Philosophers here definitely need a proper Mastodon hashtag like #histodon and #mathstodon folks have. So far I've seen #philscidon, but not #philodon or #philosodon. Is there any such hashtag in other instances? If not, which one should we use?
-
Philosophers here definitely need a proper Mastodon hashtag like #histodon and #mathstodon folks have. So far I've seen #philscidon, but not #philodon or #philosodon. Is there any such hashtag in other instances? If not, which one should we use?