home.social

#sociologyofscience — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #sociologyofscience, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Review of string theory book from 2004 brings up interesting questions regarding age-period-cohort effects in the #SociologyOfScience statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

  2. Workshop: Large Language Models for the History, Philosophy & Sociology of Science
    April 2–4, 2025
    TU Berlin, Germany & Online
    Exploring how LLMs can address challenges in HPSS research
    Keynotes by Iryna Gurevych, Nina Tahmasebi & Pierluigi Cassotti
    16 contributed talks on LLM use cases & implications

    Free and open to the public—registration encouraged! More info: tu.berlin/hps-mod-sci/workshop](tu.berlin/hps-mod-sci/workshop
    #AI #HistoryOfScience #PhilosophyOfScience #SociologyOfScience #LLMs

  3. 1/3📄🚨 Our new preprint on #ScienceMapping is out on @SocArXivBot: "Mapping Knowledge Topic Analysis of Science Locates Researchers in Disciplinary Landscape". We decompose disciplinary classification into three principles of epistemological distinction - Culture-Nature, Life-Non-life, and Materials-Methods - and replace the categorical system of disciplines with a continuous measure of topic orientations of individual researchers. #ScienceOfScience #SociologyOfScience
    🔗 doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/94jd5

  4. To make science work, scientists must trust each other. How does this change with Open Science?

    Submit an abstract to our Panel “A.2 Trust within (open) science” at STS Graz until 02.02.2024!
    stsconf.tugraz.at/calls/sessio

    #OpenScience #TrustinScience #STS #SociologyOfScience

  5. Happy to see that the article “Institutional Arrangements in the Absence of Disciplinary Definitions: Digital Humanities in Switzerland” is out now!

    doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2023-0025

    Written in collaboration with @maxkemman for the Swiss Journal of Sociology’s special issue on “Digital Academia.”

    #DigitalHumanities #SociologyOfScience

  6. How does the science reform movement align with broader changes in the academic landscape? Tom Hostler tackles this question in a new article on “Scientific reform, post-academic research, and academic identity”: markrubin.substack.com/p/scien
    🧵👇

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing

  7. "Discretion in research practice should perhaps not be seen as a weakness or a fault in the scientific method, but rather an integral part of it."

    New preprint: osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/7dh

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing

  8. “Instead of focusing purely on replicability, we should strive to maximize transparency, rigor, and quality in all aspects of research.”

    New review summarises the structural, procedural, and community changes following the replication crisis.

    Preprint: osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/r6c

    #Science
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS

  9. Preregistration:

    Interesting new article in the Journal of Trial and Error proposes that we establish core preregistration criteria (i.e., a minimum amount of information required to consider a preregistration complete) and only award preregistered badges only to articles that meet those criteria.

    🦣 Author: @drcpennington

    Open access: doi.org/10.36850/mr6

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #Preregistration

  10. Selfish Scientists

    Researchers who thought of themselves as “scientists” saw themselves as less warm, fair, cooperative, likeable.

    “The reminder of being a member of the scientific community that incentivizes individual gain might make researchers less willing to share their knowledge with peers.”

    Altenmüller et al. (2023). doi.org/10.32872/spb.10011

    #Science
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS

  11. Selfish Scientists

    Researchers who thought of themselves as “scientists” saw themselves as less warm, fair, cooperative, likeable.

    “The reminder of being a member of the scientific community that incentivizes individual gain might make researchers less willing to share their knowledge with peers.”

    Altenmüller et al. (2023). Among us: Fear of exploitation, suspiciousness, and social identity predict knowledge hiding among researchers. Social Psychological Bulletin, 18, 1-22.
    https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.10011

    #Science
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS

  12. New paper argues insights from qualitative research can help to improve open science.

    Steltenpohl et al. (2023). Rethinking transparency and rigor from a qualitative open science perspective. Journal of Trial & Error. doi.org/10.36850/mr7

    #Science
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing

  13. Theory Evaluation:

    Really interesting new preprint argues “there are multiple kinds of theories, each with unique assessment standards.”

    Miłkowski (@MilekPl; 2023). Cognitive metascience: A new approach to the study of theories. psyarxiv.com/xvyz3/

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #CognitiveMetascience
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS

  14. Open Science and Academic Workload

    New article by Thomas Hostler in the Journal of Trial and Error:

    “There is a high chance that without intervention, increased expectations to engage in open research practices may lead to unacceptable increases in demands on academics.”

    Open access: doi.org/10.36850/mr5

    #Science
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing
    @academicchatter
    #AcademicWorkload

  15. Rethinking Transparency and Rigor from a Qualitative Open Science Perspective

    “The aim of this paper is to challenge the current quantitative-focused mainstream understanding of transparency and rigor within the open science movement and suggest additional considerations relating to these concepts from qualitative research paradigms.”

    Preprint: psyarxiv.com/bpu5f

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing
    @cnsyoung

  16. Replications Welcome!

    “Replicators seem to believe that their work is seen as hostile (Nosek and Errington 2020; Nosek et al. 2022). In response, they are likely to see the outside world as a source of threats….However, the current results suggest that replicators possibly overestimate the risk of negative reactions to their work.”

    doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.

    #Science
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing

  17. A narrow definition of “research quality”

    "[Preregistration, computational reproducibility of analyses, and replication studies] are all methodological procedures which have been developed from a narrow perspective of positivist epistemology, quantitative methodology, and a-priori confirmatory hypothesis testing.”

    psyarxiv.com/2zhwe/

    🧵👉

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    @stsing
    #Preregistration
    #ReplicationCrisis

    1/4

  18. “Responsible research assessment should prioritize theory development and testing over ticking open science boxes”

    New preprint comments on proposals to change hiring and promotion in psychology to become more oriented to open science.

    psyarxiv.com/ad74m/

    Few quotes follow: 🧵👉

    #Science
    #Psychology
    @psychology
    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing
    #PsychJobs
    @academicchatter
    @academicsunite

  19. CW: Discussion of scientific racism and eugenics

    The third will (most likely) be Aaron Panofsky's
    "Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics," a #SociologyofScience book covering how geneticists, as a scientific community, participated in and responded to the arguable resurgence of race science and eugenics in the second half of the 20th century. (4/n)

  20. New discussion of preregistration argues for “three different categories of accepted papers:

    (i) non-preregistered (confirmatory or exploratory) research,

    (ii) preregistered, confirmatory research and

    (iii) non-preregistered research marked explicitly as exploratory."

    Open access: danielhers.github.io/preregist

    Mastodonian authors: @dh

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #MetaResearch
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    #Preregistration
    @stsing

  21. “Policing Replications”

    “The term policing is meant to convey that empirical scientific discovery needs to be controlled systematically to institutionalize incentives that prevent questionable research practices and fraud. We acknowledge that the term might evoke some negative connotations.”

    Ankel-Peters et al. (2023): econstor.eu/handle/10419/26793

    #OpenScience
    #MetaScience
    #ReplicationCrisis
    #SociologyofScience
    #ScienceofScience
    #STS
    @stsing

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.