home.social

#nij — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nij, aggregated by home.social.

  1. У тактических (баллистических) шлемов уровень защиты обычно классифицируют по стандартам баллистической стойкости. Наиболее распространённые системы — , и иногда .

    Ниже — практическая классификация, которая используется у военных и производителей.

    1. Level I (NIJ)

    Минимальная защита.

    Останавливает:

    .22 LR

    .380 ACP

    Назначение:

    учебные или полицейские задачи

    защита от слабых пистолетных боеприпасов

    Фактически: почти не применяется в военных шлемах.

    2. Level II (NIJ)

    Останавливает:

    9×19 mm FMJ

    .357 Magnum

    Назначение:

    полиция

    охрана

    старые модели шлемов

    3. Level IIIA (NIJ) — стандарт современных боевых шлемов

    Останавливает:

    9×19 mm

    .44 Magnum

    большинство пистолетных боеприпасов

    Типичная защита:

    осколки артиллерии

    вторичные осколки взрывов

    пистолетные пули

    Примеры шлемов:

    Это основной уровень для армии и спецназа.

    STANAG 2920 (NATO)

    Здесь используется V50 — скорость, при которой 50% осколков пробивают шлем.

    Типичные показатели:

    ШлемV50старые кевларовые~580–600 m/sсовременные UHMWPE~650 m/sтоповые~700+ m/s

    Это показатель защиты от осколков, что на поле боя важнее пистолетных пуль.

    Важно: что шлем не держит

    Даже лучшие Level IIIA шлемы обычно не выдерживают:

    5.45×39

    5.56×45 NATO

    7.62×39

    7.62×54R

    То есть винтовочные пули.

    Исключения — экспериментальные тяжёлые шлемы.

    Материалы

    Современные шлемы делают из:

    Kevlar (aramid)

    UHMWPE (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene)

    гибриды

    UHMWPE обычно:

    легче

    лучше держит осколки.

    Типичный вес

    ТипВесKevlar1.4–1.7 кгUHMWPE1.1–1.4 кг

    💡 Практический вывод:
    На войне (включая российско-украинскую) главная задача шлема — защита от осколков, потому что 60–80% ранений головы происходят именно от них, а не от пуль.

    Если нужно — могу разобрать ещё:

    реальные шлемы ВСУ и НАТО

    китайские и российские аналоги

    какие модели реально лучше на фронте

    миф о «шлем держит автомат».

    #ТактическийШлем
    #БаллистическаяЗащита
    #БаллистическийШлем
    #NIJ
    #STANAG2920
    #LevelIIIA
    #ВоенноеСнаряжение
    #АрмейскоеСнаряжение
    #ЗащитаГоловы
    #ВоеннаяЭкипировка
    #Кевлар
    #UHMWPE
    #BallisticHelmet
    #MilitaryGear
    #BodyArmor
    #HelmetProtection
    #CombatGear
    #SoldierEquipment
    #MilitaryTechnology
    #DefenseTechnology

  2. У тактических (баллистических) шлемов уровень защиты обычно классифицируют по стандартам баллистической стойкости. Наиболее распространённые системы — , и иногда .

    Ниже — практическая классификация, которая используется у военных и производителей.

    1. Level I (NIJ)

    Минимальная защита.

    Останавливает:

    .22 LR

    .380 ACP

    Назначение:

    учебные или полицейские задачи

    защита от слабых пистолетных боеприпасов

    Фактически: почти не применяется в военных шлемах.

    2. Level II (NIJ)

    Останавливает:

    9×19 mm FMJ

    .357 Magnum

    Назначение:

    полиция

    охрана

    старые модели шлемов

    3. Level IIIA (NIJ) — стандарт современных боевых шлемов

    Останавливает:

    9×19 mm

    .44 Magnum

    большинство пистолетных боеприпасов

    Типичная защита:

    осколки артиллерии

    вторичные осколки взрывов

    пистолетные пули

    Примеры шлемов:

    Это основной уровень для армии и спецназа.

    STANAG 2920 (NATO)

    Здесь используется V50 — скорость, при которой 50% осколков пробивают шлем.

    Типичные показатели:

    ШлемV50старые кевларовые~580–600 m/sсовременные UHMWPE~650 m/sтоповые~700+ m/s

    Это показатель защиты от осколков, что на поле боя важнее пистолетных пуль.

    Важно: что шлем не держит

    Даже лучшие Level IIIA шлемы обычно не выдерживают:

    5.45×39

    5.56×45 NATO

    7.62×39

    7.62×54R

    То есть винтовочные пули.

    Исключения — экспериментальные тяжёлые шлемы.

    Материалы

    Современные шлемы делают из:

    Kevlar (aramid)

    UHMWPE (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene)

    гибриды

    UHMWPE обычно:

    легче

    лучше держит осколки.

    Типичный вес

    ТипВесKevlar1.4–1.7 кгUHMWPE1.1–1.4 кг

    💡 Практический вывод:
    На войне (включая российско-украинскую) главная задача шлема — защита от осколков, потому что 60–80% ранений головы происходят именно от них, а не от пуль.

    Если нужно — могу разобрать ещё:

    реальные шлемы ВСУ и НАТО

    китайские и российские аналоги

    какие модели реально лучше на фронте

    миф о «шлем держит автомат».

    #ТактическийШлем
    #БаллистическаяЗащита
    #БаллистическийШлем
    #NIJ
    #STANAG2920
    #LevelIIIA
    #ВоенноеСнаряжение
    #АрмейскоеСнаряжение
    #ЗащитаГоловы
    #ВоеннаяЭкипировка
    #Кевлар
    #UHMWPE
    #BallisticHelmet
    #MilitaryGear
    #BodyArmor
    #HelmetProtection
    #CombatGear
    #SoldierEquipment
    #MilitaryTechnology
    #DefenseTechnology

  3. Update. The report the #Trump #DOJ just took down was originally released in June 2024, during the #Biden administration. But the Biden National Institute of Justice (#NIJ) wasn't the only research org to conclude that most domestic terrorism in the US is from the right wing.

    The conservative #CatoInstitute (@cato) reaffirmed that conclusion last week.

    According to Cato research, there were 620 politically-motivated murders in the US in the last half-century. 391 were from the right and 65 from the left. (The rest were from Islamism, separatism, or other ideologies.) Politically-motivated right-wing murder is more than 6x as frequent as politically-motivated left-wing murder.

    These numbers do not count the deaths from the 9/11 attacks because they were not domestic terrorism.

    See the numbers in the Cato Institute report from last week …
    cato.org/blog/politically-moti

    … or in this graphic from Time Magazine based on Cato data:
    time.com/7317383/political-vio

    #DefendResearch #Takedowns #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics

  4. Update. The report the #Trump #DOJ just took down was originally released in June 2024, during the #Biden administration. But the Biden National Institute of Justice (#NIJ) wasn't the only research org to conclude that most domestic terrorism in the US is from the right wing.

    The conservative #CatoInstitute (@cato) reaffirmed that conclusion last week.

    According to Cato research, there were 620 politically-motivated murders in the US in the last half-century. 391 were from the right and 65 from the left. (The rest were from Islamism, separatism, or other ideologies.) Politically-motivated right-wing murder is more than 6x as frequent as politically-motivated left-wing murder.

    These numbers do not count the deaths from the 9/11 attacks because they were not domestic terrorism.

    See the numbers in the Cato Institute report from last week …
    cato.org/blog/politically-moti

    … or in this graphic from Time Magazine based on Cato data:
    time.com/7317383/political-vio

    #DefendResearch #Takedowns #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics

  5. Update. The report the #Trump #DOJ just took down was originally released in June 2024, during the #Biden administration. But the Biden National Institute of Justice (#NIJ) wasn't the only research org to conclude that most domestic terrorism in the US is from the right wing.

    The conservative #CatoInstitute (@cato) reaffirmed that conclusion last week.

    According to Cato research, there were 620 politically-motivated murders in the US in the last half-century. 391 were from the right and 65 from the left. (The rest were from Islamism, separatism, or other ideologies.) Politically-motivated right-wing murder is more than 6x as frequent as politically-motivated left-wing murder.

    These numbers do not count the deaths from the 9/11 attacks because they were not domestic terrorism.

    See the numbers in the Cato Institute report from last week …
    cato.org/blog/politically-moti

    … or in this graphic from Time Magazine based on Cato data:
    time.com/7317383/political-vio

    #DefendResearch #Takedowns #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics

  6. Update. The report the #Trump #DOJ just took down was originally released in June 2024, during the #Biden administration. But the Biden National Institute of Justice (#NIJ) wasn't the only research org to conclude that most domestic terrorism in the US is from the right wing.

    The conservative #CatoInstitute (@cato) reaffirmed that conclusion last week.

    According to Cato research, there were 620 politically-motivated murders in the US in the last half-century. 391 were from the right and 65 from the left. (The rest were from Islamism, separatism, or other ideologies.) Politically-motivated right-wing murder is more than 6x as frequent as politically-motivated left-wing murder.

    These numbers do not count the deaths from the 9/11 attacks because they were not domestic terrorism.

    See the numbers in the Cato Institute report from last week …
    cato.org/blog/politically-moti

    … or in this graphic from Time Magazine based on Cato data:
    time.com/7317383/political-vio

    #DefendResearch #Takedowns #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics

  7. Update. The report the #Trump #DOJ just took down was originally released in June 2024, during the #Biden administration. But the Biden National Institute of Justice (#NIJ) wasn't the only research org to conclude that most domestic terrorism in the US is from the right wing.

    The conservative #CatoInstitute (@cato) reaffirmed that conclusion last week.

    According to Cato research, there were 620 politically-motivated murders in the US in the last half-century. 391 were from the right and 65 from the left. (The rest were from Islamism, separatism, or other ideologies.) Politically-motivated right-wing murder is more than 6x as frequent as politically-motivated left-wing murder.

    These numbers do not count the deaths from the 9/11 attacks because they were not domestic terrorism.

    See the numbers in the Cato Institute report from last week …
    cato.org/blog/politically-moti

    … or in this graphic from Time Magazine based on Cato data:
    time.com/7317383/political-vio

    #DefendResearch #Takedowns #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics

  8. "DOJ Deletes Study Showing Domestic Terrorists Are Most Often Right Wing."
    404media.co/doj-deletes-study-
    (#paywalled)

    "The Department of Justice has removed a study showing that white supremacist and far-right violence 'continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism' in the United States. The study, which was conducted by the National Institute of Justice [#NIJ] and hosted on a #DOJ website was available there at least until September 12, 2025, according to an archive of the page saved by the Wayback Machine. Daniel Malmer, a PhD student studying online extremism at UNC-Chapel Hill, first noticed the paper was deleted."

    Here's the archived copy in the Wayback Machine.
    web.archive.org/web/2025091116

    #Censorship #DefendResearch #DOJ #Takedowns #Trump #TrumpVResearch #USPol #USPolitics