#jsonld — Public Fediverse posts

Here is my work-in-progress FEP for using JSON Resume with ActivityPub:

FEP-6158: ActivityPub 'Resume' Object: JSON Resume expressed as JSON-LD

https://codeberg.org/reiver/fep/src/branch/fep-6158/fep/6158/fep-6158.md

I prefer to write for clarity, so it still needs work.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONResume #fep6158 #fep_6158

Here is my work-in-progress FEP for using JSON Resume with ActivityPub:

FEP-6158: ActivityPub 'Resume' Object: JSON Resume expressed as JSON-LD

https://codeberg.org/reiver/fep/src/branch/fep-6158/fep/6158/fep-6158.md

I prefer to write for clarity, so it still needs work.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONResume #fep6158 #fep_6158

Here is my work-in-progress FEP for using JSON Resume with ActivityPub:

FEP-6158: ActivityPub 'Resume' Object: JSON Resume expressed as JSON-LD

https://codeberg.org/reiver/fep/src/branch/fep-6158/fep/6158/fep-6158.md

I prefer to write for clarity, so it still needs work.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONResume #fep6158 #fep_6158

Here is my work-in-progress FEP for using JSON Resume with ActivityPub:

FEP-6158: ActivityPub 'Resume' Object: JSON Resume expressed as JSON-LD

https://codeberg.org/reiver/fep/src/branch/fep-6158/fep/6158/fep-6158.md

I prefer to write for clarity, so it still needs work.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONResume #fep6158 #fep_6158

Here is my work-in-progress FEP for using JSON Resume with ActivityPub:

FEP-6158: ActivityPub 'Resume' Object: JSON Resume expressed as JSON-LD

https://codeberg.org/reiver/fep/src/branch/fep-6158/fep/6158/fep-6158.md

I prefer to write for clarity, so it still needs work.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONResume #fep6158 #fep_6158

I may have written a JSON-LD schema for JSON Resume.

It is defined in terms of ActivityPub.
For example:

'Resume' is a sub-type of an ActivityPub 'Object'. There are some new fields defined. Etc.

...

Now the question is — where do I put it?

Do I create a pull-request to the JSON Resume resume-schema repo?

Do I create a FEP?

Do I put it somewhere else?

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

I may have written a JSON-LD schema for JSON Resume.

It is defined in terms of ActivityPub.
For example:

'Resume' is a sub-type of an ActivityPub 'Object'. There are some new fields defined. Etc.

...

Now the question is — where do I put it?

Do I create a pull-request to the JSON Resume resume-schema repo?

Do I create a FEP?

Do I put it somewhere else?

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

I may have written a JSON-LD schema for JSON Resume.

It is defined in terms of ActivityPub.
For example:

'Resume' is a sub-type of an ActivityPub 'Object'. There are some new fields defined. Etc.

...

Now the question is — where do I put it?

Do I create a pull-request to the JSON Resume resume-schema repo?

Do I create a FEP?

Do I put it somewhere else?

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

I may have written a JSON-LD schema for JSON Resume.

It is defined in terms of ActivityPub.
For example:

'Resume' is a sub-type of an ActivityPub 'Object'. There are some new fields defined. Etc.

...

Now the question is — where do I put it?

Do I create a pull-request to the JSON Resume resume-schema repo?

Do I create a FEP?

Do I put it somewhere else?

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

I may have written a JSON-LD schema for JSON Resume.

It is defined in terms of ActivityPub.
For example:

'Resume' is a sub-type of an ActivityPub 'Object'. There are some new fields defined. Etc.

...

Now the question is — where do I put it?

Do I create a pull-request to the JSON Resume resume-schema repo?

Do I create a FEP?

Do I put it somewhere else?

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

My personal desire would be to create a format from scratch (because you are in control, you get something bespoke to your needs, and it is personally satisfying), but —

I think there is probably an advantage to using something (such as JSON resume) that already has wide adoption.

I guess that makes me inclined towards the latter.

...

So, if I go that way, I would have to decide: plain JSON or JSON-LD.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

My personal desire would be to create a format from scratch (because you are in control, you get something bespoke to your needs, and it is personally satisfying), but —

I think there is probably an advantage to using something (such as JSON resume) that already has wide adoption.

I guess that makes me inclined towards the latter.

...

So, if I go that way, I would have to decide: plain JSON or JSON-LD.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

My personal desire would be to create a format from scratch (because you are in control, you get something bespoke to your needs, and it is personally satisfying), but —

I think there is probably an advantage to using something (such as JSON resume) that already has wide adoption.

I guess that makes me inclined towards the latter.

...

So, if I go that way, I would have to decide: plain JSON or JSON-LD.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

My personal desire would be to create a format from scratch (because you are in control, you get something bespoke to your needs, and it is personally satisfying), but —

I think there is probably an advantage to using something (such as JSON resume) that already has wide adoption.

I guess that makes me inclined towards the latter.

...

So, if I go that way, I would have to decide: plain JSON or JSON-LD.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

My personal desire would be to create a format from scratch (because you are in control, you get something bespoke to your needs, and it is personally satisfying), but —

I think there is probably an advantage to using something (such as JSON resume) that already has wide adoption.

I guess that makes me inclined towards the latter.

...

So, if I go that way, I would have to decide: plain JSON or JSON-LD.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116597879302607072

More on a resume / CV on the Fediverse on Social Web.

Another option could be to use something like "JSON resume":

https://jsonresume.org/

https://github.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/blob/master/job-schema.json

It seems to be popular.

It isn't JSON-LD. Although I think it would be straightforward to translate it to JSON-LD, if that was desired.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116597879302607072

More on a resume / CV on the Fediverse on Social Web.

Another option could be to use something like "JSON resume":

https://jsonresume.org/

https://github.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/blob/master/job-schema.json

It seems to be popular.

It isn't JSON-LD. Although I think it would be straightforward to translate it to JSON-LD, if that was desired.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116597879302607072

More on a resume / CV on the Fediverse on Social Web.

Another option could be to use something like "JSON resume":

https://jsonresume.org/

https://github.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/blob/master/job-schema.json

It seems to be popular.

It isn't JSON-LD. Although I think it would be straightforward to translate it to JSON-LD, if that was desired.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116597879302607072

More on a resume / CV on the Fediverse on Social Web.

Another option could be to use something like "JSON resume":

https://jsonresume.org/

https://github.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/blob/master/job-schema.json

It seems to be popular.

It isn't JSON-LD. Although I think it would be straightforward to translate it to JSON-LD, if that was desired.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116597879302607072

More on a resume / CV on the Fediverse on Social Web.

Another option could be to use something like "JSON resume":

https://jsonresume.org/

https://github.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/blob/master/job-schema.json

It seems to be popular.

It isn't JSON-LD. Although I think it would be straightforward to translate it to JSON-LD, if that was desired.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116597841178183282

There is also the other question of — would the resume / CV be JSON-LD.

On one hand, if it was in JSON-LD, it would make it machine-legible similar to ActivityPub.

On the other hand, I don't think anyone is going to write JSON-LD (especially HTML embedded in a JSON string value) by hand. But, I do think some people will want to write their resume by hand.

It feels like user-experience is fighting with JSON-LD based machine-legibility.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD

How could you represent a resume / CV on the Fediverse and Social Web? Where would you put it? Etc?

I think it is tempting to put the whole resume in the Actor document.

But, it is probably better for the Actor document to point (rather than include) it. And, have the resume / CV live somewhere else.

It should probably be done in a way that let's people have multiple resumes / CV. For example, for different roles / career tracks, etc.

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD

In ActivityPub, these are all equivalent:

"type":"Banana"

"type":["Banana"]

"type":{"＠id":"Banana"}

"type":[{"＠id":"Banana"}]

"type":{"id":"Banana"}

"type":[{"id":"Banana"}]

"＠type":"Banana"

"＠type":["Banana"]

"＠type":{"＠id":"Banana"}

"＠type":[{"＠id":"Banana"}]

"＠type":{"id":"Banana"}

"＠type":[{"id":"Banana"}]

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #JSONLD

In ActivityPub, these are all equivalent:

"type":"Banana"

"type":["Banana"]

"type":{"＠id":"Banana"}

"type":[{"＠id":"Banana"}]

"type":{"id":"Banana"}

"type":[{"id":"Banana"}]

"＠type":"Banana"

"＠type":["Banana"]

"＠type":{"＠id":"Banana"}

"＠type":[{"＠id":"Banana"}]

"＠type":{"id":"Banana"}

"＠type":[{"id":"Banana"}]

#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #JSONLD

What do you think about JSON-LD language maps for "preferredUsername"?

I.e., preferredUsernameMap.

"preferredUsernameMap": {
"en": "hello",
"fa": "درود",
"ko": "안녕하세요"
}

#FediDev #JSONLD #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams

@Floppy @amcewen

The "which BIT" and the - as I call it - #LinkedData conundrum, I addressed recently in a #SocialHub topic on the #JSONLD vs plain #JSON nature of #ActivityPub. Inspired to write a long and personal #SocialExperience tale on my travels in wild #fedi lands. See..

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116368803389082089

The #EU @ngi #grant programs and the hard work of @nlnet to distribute @EUCommission Horizon Europe #funding has done wonders to take #fediverse where it stands today. In my article I list all the many #FOSS projects that received stimulus and support during the years.

However something fundamental has been lacking in the mandate on who is eligible. Coding is Social. The support does not cover the rich tapestry of #expertise that end-to-end #solutions need during their lifecycle. Does not include fostering cohesive #technology ecosystems, healthy #OpenStandards evolution.

Effectively this creates a 'handover point' of software code from poor FOSS to others who earn a living with it.

@Floppy @amcewen

The "which BIT" and the - as I call it - #LinkedData conundrum, I addressed recently in a #SocialHub topic on the #JSONLD vs plain #JSON nature of #ActivityPub. Inspired to write a long and personal #SocialExperience tale on my travels in wild #fedi lands. See..

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116368803389082089

The #EU @ngi #grant programs and the hard work of @nlnet to distribute @EUCommission Horizon Europe #funding has done wonders to take #fediverse where it stands today. In my article I list all the many #FOSS projects that received stimulus and support during the years.

However something fundamental has been lacking in the mandate on who is eligible. Coding is Social. The support does not cover the rich tapestry of #expertise that end-to-end #solutions need during their lifecycle. Does not include fostering cohesive #technology ecosystems, healthy #OpenStandards evolution.

Effectively this creates a 'handover point' of software code from poor FOSS to others who earn a living with it.

@Floppy @amcewen

The "which BIT" and the - as I call it - #LinkedData conundrum, I addressed recently in a #SocialHub topic on the #JSONLD vs plain #JSON nature of #ActivityPub. Inspired to write a long and personal #SocialExperience tale on my travels in wild #fedi lands. See..

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116368803389082089

The #EU @ngi #grant programs and the hard work of @nlnet to distribute @EUCommission Horizon Europe #funding has done wonders to take #fediverse where it stands today. In my article I list all the many #FOSS projects that received stimulus and support during the years.

However something fundamental has been lacking in the mandate on who is eligible. Coding is Social. The support does not cover the rich tapestry of #expertise that end-to-end #solutions need during their lifecycle. Does not include fostering cohesive #technology ecosystems, healthy #OpenStandards evolution.

Effectively this creates a 'handover point' of software code from poor FOSS to others who earn a living with it.

@Floppy @amcewen

The "which BIT" and the - as I call it - #LinkedData conundrum, I addressed recently in a #SocialHub topic on the #JSONLD vs plain #JSON nature of #ActivityPub. Inspired to write a long and personal #SocialExperience tale on my travels in wild #fedi lands. See..

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116368803389082089

The #EU @ngi #grant programs and the hard work of @nlnet to distribute @EUCommission Horizon Europe #funding has done wonders to take #fediverse where it stands today. In my article I list all the many #FOSS projects that received stimulus and support during the years.

However something fundamental has been lacking in the mandate on who is eligible. Coding is Social. The support does not cover the rich tapestry of #expertise that end-to-end #solutions need during their lifecycle. Does not include fostering cohesive #technology ecosystems, healthy #OpenStandards evolution.

Effectively this creates a 'handover point' of software code from poor FOSS to others who earn a living with it.

@Floppy @amcewen

The "which BIT" and the - as I call it - #LinkedData conundrum, I addressed recently in a #SocialHub topic on the #JSONLD vs plain #JSON nature of #ActivityPub. Inspired to write a long and personal #SocialExperience tale on my travels in wild #fedi lands. See..

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116368803389082089

The #EU @ngi #grant programs and the hard work of @nlnet to distribute @EUCommission Horizon Europe #funding has done wonders to take #fediverse where it stands today. In my article I list all the many #FOSS projects that received stimulus and support during the years.

However something fundamental has been lacking in the mandate on who is eligible. Coding is Social. The support does not cover the rich tapestry of #expertise that end-to-end #solutions need during their lifecycle. Does not include fostering cohesive #technology ecosystems, healthy #OpenStandards evolution.

Effectively this creates a 'handover point' of software code from poor FOSS to others who earn a living with it.

As precursor to my blog post announcement later today, here's my #SocialHub response to the topic on how to treat the #LinkedData based #ActivityPub open standard where messages can be expressed both as plain #JSON as well as in #JSONLD, leading to the most costly misconception that has dragged the #fediverse sideways from its original promise and power..

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628/24

As precursor to my blog post announcement later today, here's my #SocialHub response to the topic on how to treat the #LinkedData based #ActivityPub open standard where messages can be expressed both as plain #JSON as well as in #JSONLD, leading to the most costly misconception that has dragged the #fediverse sideways from its original promise and power..

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628/24

As precursor to my blog post announcement later today, here's my #SocialHub response to the topic on how to treat the #LinkedData based #ActivityPub open standard where messages can be expressed both as plain #JSON as well as in #JSONLD, leading to the most costly misconception that has dragged the #fediverse sideways from its original promise and power..

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628/24

As precursor to my blog post announcement later today, here's my #SocialHub response to the topic on how to treat the #LinkedData based #ActivityPub open standard where messages can be expressed both as plain #JSON as well as in #JSONLD, leading to the most costly misconception that has dragged the #fediverse sideways from its original promise and power..

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628/24

As precursor to my blog post announcement later today, here's my #SocialHub response to the topic on how to treat the #LinkedData based #ActivityPub open standard where messages can be expressed both as plain #JSON as well as in #JSONLD, leading to the most costly misconception that has dragged the #fediverse sideways from its original promise and power..

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628/24

@mavnn

> As an aside, I'm quite liking the ActivityPub APIs so far, although ld-json does leave me feeling like there's a fair jump from "script that works" to "actually does everything the spec would theoretically allow".

There's the "linked data conundrum" as I call it, which recently reared its head again, triggered by a #SocialHub post I created the other day:

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628

The #LinkedData conundrum is the eternal friction between the plain #JSON and the #JSONLD view of the #ActivityPub social web. And it has never really be solved. I consider it one of the misconception that led to endless discussion, confusion, and waste of time. For the ActivityPub API which hold the promise to correct course towards a more standards-compliant #fediverse, I created an issue on the subject..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/63

Followed by another on protocol design..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/66

@mavnn

> As an aside, I'm quite liking the ActivityPub APIs so far, although ld-json does leave me feeling like there's a fair jump from "script that works" to "actually does everything the spec would theoretically allow".

There's the "linked data conundrum" as I call it, which recently reared its head again, triggered by a #SocialHub post I created the other day:

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628

The #LinkedData conundrum is the eternal friction between the plain #JSON and the #JSONLD view of the #ActivityPub social web. And it has never really be solved. I consider it one of the misconception that led to endless discussion, confusion, and waste of time. For the ActivityPub API which hold the promise to correct course towards a more standards-compliant #fediverse, I created an issue on the subject..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/63

Followed by another on protocol design..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/66

@mavnn

> As an aside, I'm quite liking the ActivityPub APIs so far, although ld-json does leave me feeling like there's a fair jump from "script that works" to "actually does everything the spec would theoretically allow".

There's the "linked data conundrum" as I call it, which recently reared its head again, triggered by a #SocialHub post I created the other day:

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628

The #LinkedData conundrum is the eternal friction between the plain #JSON and the #JSONLD view of the #ActivityPub social web. And it has never really be solved. I consider it one of the misconception that led to endless discussion, confusion, and waste of time. For the ActivityPub API which hold the promise to correct course towards a more standards-compliant #fediverse, I created an issue on the subject..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/63

Followed by another on protocol design..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/66

@mavnn

> As an aside, I'm quite liking the ActivityPub APIs so far, although ld-json does leave me feeling like there's a fair jump from "script that works" to "actually does everything the spec would theoretically allow".

There's the "linked data conundrum" as I call it, which recently reared its head again, triggered by a #SocialHub post I created the other day:

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628

The #LinkedData conundrum is the eternal friction between the plain #JSON and the #JSONLD view of the #ActivityPub social web. And it has never really be solved. I consider it one of the misconception that led to endless discussion, confusion, and waste of time. For the ActivityPub API which hold the promise to correct course towards a more standards-compliant #fediverse, I created an issue on the subject..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/63

Followed by another on protocol design..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/66

@mavnn

> As an aside, I'm quite liking the ActivityPub APIs so far, although ld-json does leave me feeling like there's a fair jump from "script that works" to "actually does everything the spec would theoretically allow".

There's the "linked data conundrum" as I call it, which recently reared its head again, triggered by a #SocialHub post I created the other day:

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/practices-around-json-formatting-of-json-ld-messages/8628

The #LinkedData conundrum is the eternal friction between the plain #JSON and the #JSONLD view of the #ActivityPub social web. And it has never really be solved. I consider it one of the misconception that led to endless discussion, confusion, and waste of time. For the ActivityPub API which hold the promise to correct course towards a more standards-compliant #fediverse, I created an issue on the subject..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/63

Followed by another on protocol design..

https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-api/issues/66

FYI: Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #LLMSTXT #Fortune500 #AIVisibility #RobotsTxt #JSONLD

FYI: Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #LLMSTXT #Fortune500 #AIVisibility #RobotsTxt #JSONLD

FYI: Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #LLMSTXT #Fortune500 #AIVisibility #RobotsTxt #JSONLD

Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #Fortune500 #AI #llms #robotsTxt #JSONLD

Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #Fortune500 #AI #llms #robotsTxt #JSONLD

Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #Fortune500 #AI #llms #robotsTxt #JSONLD

Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #Fortune500 #AI #llms #robotsTxt #JSONLD

Only 7.4% of Fortune 500 have an llms.txt file, study finds: ProGEO.ai research reveals just 7.4% of Fortune 500 companies have implemented llms.txt, while 92.8% use robots.txt and 53.8% use JSON-LD for AI visibility. https://ppc.land/only-7-4-of-fortune-500-have-an-llms-txt-file-study-finds/ #Fortune500 #AI #llms #robotsTxt #JSONLD

Are there any good talks or videos on JSON-LD in the context of the Fediverse? I've already looked at https://json-ld.org/learn/, but I'm wondering if there are any more recent or Fediverse-focused talks.

#fediverse #jsonld

@reiver

Today "ActivityStreams: Where do you want to go to today?" might be a slogan we borrowed from Microsoft.

The question is whether #ActivityStreams should be used - besides all the things it is already being used for - to also map to file systems.

The #LinkedData nature of #ActivityPub is generally shunned in favor of plain #JSON. That in itself is fine, as long as:

a) information still represents valid #JSONLD.

b) information models still follow data modeling best practices.

c) information models are designed with #interoperability in mind.

Not saying your approach is good or bad, just observing that everyone mapping and overloading their own app-specific semantics to the poor AS vocab looks to me a worst-practice. We can get away with it, as we made post-facto interop the poor man's accepted practice, lacking more rigorous extension process and guidance.

There are likely existing standardized ontologies.