#digitalintimacy — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #digitalintimacy, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: July 29, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Psychologists studied adult webcam interactions and found a surprising relationship dynamic
New research provides evidence that emotional intimacy and personal investment are strongly associated with commitment in online adult webcam relationships. The findings challenge the common assumption that these digitally mediated relationships are purely transactional exchanges based solely on financial payments. The new study was published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Online adult webcam platforms, commonly known as cam sites, feature live and interactive video broadcasts. Unlike pre-recorded adult videos, camming allows viewers to communicate with performers in real time. This interactive element provides opportunities for personal conversations, companionship, and shared sexual experiences. Millions of people interact on these platforms every day, making them a major arena for modern digital socialization.
Because money is exchanged for access to these live broadcasts, these connections are heavily rooted in commerce. Viewers pay for a performer’s time, and performers rely on this income to support themselves financially. These arrangements often challenge conventional boundaries between commercial services and personal affection. Performers sometimes provide what is known as the girlfriend experience, purposefully cultivating encounters that feature casual conversation and companionship rather than just physical performances.
Rhonda N. Balzarini, an assistant professor of psychology at Texas State University and a research fellow at the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, noticed a disconnect in how these platforms were often portrayed. She will be promoted to associate professor in September 2026. Balzarini explained that her team wanted to explore the reality of these digital connections.
“Digital intimacy is becoming an increasingly common part of people’s lives, yet we know surprisingly little about how these relationships actually function,” Balzarini said. “Camming platforms are one of the fastest-growing forms of online intimacy, with millions of people using them worldwide, but most research has focused on the sexual or commercial aspects of these interactions rather than the relationships that develop over time.”
To better understand how these digital bonds form and persist, the authors looked to a well-known psychological framework called the investment model of commitment processes. This framework suggests that people are more likely to stay in a relationship when they feel highly satisfied, have invested significant resources into the connection, and perceive that they have poor alternatives outside the relationship. In this context, resources can include time, money, and emotional energy.
“What fascinated us was that many cam models and members describe their interactions as extending beyond sex or financial exchange,” Balzarini noted. “Some report forming meaningful emotional connections, and even relationships that resemble romantic partnerships.”
This model relies on interdependence theory, a psychological concept suggesting that people evaluate relationships by weighing the perceived rewards against the perceived costs. When the rewards, such as pleasure, fulfillment, or emotional support, outweigh the costs, such as anxiety or financial expense, individuals tend to feel satisfied. They also compare their current situation to potential alternatives, such as dating someone else or being single.
Past studies have consistently supported this model in traditional romantic partnerships, friendships, and non-monogamous relationships. Very little is known about how these commitment processes operate in digital environments where interactions are paid for and physical contact is absent. Camming relationships present a specific dynamic because exclusivity is neither expected nor enforced by the platforms.
“As relationship scientists, we wanted to know whether the same psychological processes that keep traditional romantic relationships together also apply in this very different context,” Balzarini told PsyPost. “Are these relationships driven primarily by money and convenience, or do factors like satisfaction, investment, and intimacy also play a role?”
The researchers designed this study to see if the traditional investment model applies to online camming relationships. Because performers and viewers interact in a space where many other potential partners are readily available, the authors suspected that the perceived quality of alternatives might not matter as much as it does in exclusive relationships. Instead, they proposed that emotional intimacy might play a larger role in determining commitment.
To examine these dynamics, the researchers recruited participants from LiveJasmin, one of the most visited adult webcam platforms in the world. The study included two distinct groups of participants. The first group consisted of 544 paying members, the vast majority of whom were heterosexual men in their mid-forties. The second group consisted of 199 cam models, primarily heterosexual women in their early thirties.
The scientists recruited the paying members by displaying a brief pop-up advertisement that appeared after a user spent ten seconds on the website’s main directory. The cam models were invited to participate through an email newsletter distributed by the platform. The survey for members was offered in English, and the survey for models was translated into Romanian, Russian, and Spanish to accommodate the most common languages spoken by performers on the site.
Participants were not paired up as couples. They answered questions regarding the specific model or member they had interacted with for the longest period of time. Participants completed a digital survey that included brief, single-item questions derived from established psychological questionnaires. They rated their feelings on a seven-point scale, ranging from completely disagreeing to completely agreeing.
The survey asked participants to rate their relationship satisfaction, the amount of investment they had put into the connection, the quality of their alternative options, and their level of emotional intimacy. They were also asked to rate their current level of commitment to maintaining the relationship.
Finally, participants estimated future financial investments. Members were asked to project how much virtual currency, known on the platform as credits, they planned to spend on their preferred model in the coming month. Credits are purchased with real money and can be used for exclusive private shows or tipping.
In preliminary analyses, the researchers discovered that the paying members reported higher average levels of relationship satisfaction, investment, and intimacy than the cam models did. The members also rated their alternative options more highly than the models rated theirs. Despite these differences, the two groups reported equal levels of overall commitment to their connections.
“One of the biggest surprises was that many cam models, not just members, described their interactions as genuine relationships,” Balzarini said. “Public discussions often focus on members becoming emotionally attached, but our findings suggest that cam models also sometimes view these interactions as meaningful relationships rather than simply business transactions.”
The statistical analysis revealed that the quality of alternative partners did not significantly predict relationship commitment for either the models or the members. Even though participants had access to countless other people on the website, this availability did not weaken their dedication to their primary connection. The researchers found that dropping the concept of alternatives from their statistical model provided a better fit for the data.
Instead, the analysis showed that relationship satisfaction, personal investment, and emotional intimacy were all positively associated with commitment. When cam models and paying members reported higher levels of intimacy and satisfaction, they also tended to report stronger dedication to maintaining the relationship. For the paying members, the amount of resources they had already invested was a particularly strong predictor of their ongoing commitment.
“The effects were not trivial,” Balzarini explained. “They were actually quite large. Satisfaction, investment, and intimacy together explained about 68% of the differences in commitment among members and more than half of the differences in commitment among cam models, which is substantial for psychological research.”
She added that the researchers were surprised by how well the investment model applied to both groups. Among both members and cam models, greater satisfaction, investment, and intimacy were consistently associated with stronger commitment.
“The biggest takeaway is that these relationships are not simply transactional,” Balzarini said. “While financial exchange is certainly part of the interaction, emotional connection matters too. We found that intimacy was a key predictor of commitment, suggesting that many people aren’t just paying for content, they’re forming relationships that provide companionship, connection, and a sense of intimacy.”
This heightened commitment was also associated with future financial behavior. Through a statistical technique called path analysis, which tests relationships between multiple variables, the researchers found that members with higher levels of commitment intended to spend more money on their preferred model in the future. Similarly, highly committed models expected to receive greater financial investments from their preferred members.
Several limitations and potential misinterpretations should be considered when reviewing these findings. Balzarini warned against assuming that cam models become committed simply because they expect future financial investment.
“That is not what our study shows,” she said. “We found that for both members and cam models, greater satisfaction, investment, and intimacy were associated with greater commitment, and greater commitment was then associated with stronger expectations of future investment. In other words, anticipated future investment was associated with commitment, but our data do not tell us that it is the reason cam models become committed in the first place.”
The study utilized a cross-sectional design, meaning the researchers collected all the data at a single point in time. This approach makes it impossible to determine the direction of cause and effect. It remains unknown whether intimacy causes increased commitment or if committed individuals simply tend to develop deeper intimacy over time.
“More broadly, our study is correlational, so we cannot determine cause and effect,” Balzarini noted. “It is possible that greater commitment leads people to anticipate greater future investment, that anticipated investment strengthens commitment, or that both are influenced by other factors we did not measure.”
The researchers also pointed out that not every interaction on a camming platform develops into an emotionally meaningful relationship. Many participants described their interactions as casual rather than relational. The findings simply show that for a substantial subset of users who do form these relationships, commitment appears to be associated with many of the same factors that are important in other relationship contexts.
Another limitation involves the demographic makeup of the sample, which was primarily heterosexual and gender-conforming. Future studies would benefit from including a more diverse range of sexual orientations and gender identities to see if these patterns hold true across different communities. The study also relied entirely on self-reported data, which can sometimes be influenced by personal biases or poor memory.
“This study is really just a starting point,” Balzarini said. “One of our biggest priorities is conducting longitudinal research to understand how these relationships develop over time. Because our data were collected at a single point in time, we cannot determine how commitment evolves or whether satisfaction, investment, and intimacy change as these relationships grow or dissolve.”
Balzarini expressed a desire to study cam models and members who are actually interacting with one another. By recruiting matched pairs rather than independent samples of models and members, researchers could better understand how each person’s experiences influence the other. She also hopes to explore the broader impacts of these platforms.
“Another important next step is understanding how introducing digital intimacy into people’s lives affects well-being,” she said. “For example, we are interested in following individuals with no prior experience using camming platforms to examine how beginning to use these platforms influences mental health, relationship quality, loneliness, and well-being over time.”
Future studies might explore whether digitally mediated intimacy could complement therapeutic approaches for individuals with physical disabilities, social anxiety, or high rejection sensitivity. Balzarini is also interested in the potential implications for body image. Preliminary research suggests that positive interactions in these digital spaces may improve body image and body acceptance for some individuals.
“Ultimately, my broader goal is to understand how technology is reshaping intimacy,” Balzarini explained. “Rather than assuming digital relationships are inherently good or bad, I think the more important scientific question is identifying who benefits, under what circumstances, and why.”
She expressed gratitude to the members and cam models from LiveJasmin who volunteered their time to participate in the research. She noted that studies like this are only possible because people are willing to share honest accounts of their experiences.
“I also hope this study encourages people to approach digital intimacy with curiosity rather than assumptions,” Balzarini concluded. “Whether people ultimately view these relationships positively or negatively, understanding them through careful scientific research is far more informative than relying on stereotypes or preconceived notions.”
The study, “Beyond the Transaction: Commitment, Intimacy, and Investment in Online Camming Relationships,” was authored by Rhonda N. Balzarini, Taylor Himes, Faith Swanson, Brandi Reynolds, and Christopher R. Agnew.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DigitalIntimacy #OnlineCamming #CamModels #RelationshipCommitment #InvestmentModel #EmotionalIntimacy #LiveJasmin #ArchivesOfSexualBehavior #ModernRelationships #WebcamRelationships
-
DATE: July 29, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Psychologists studied adult webcam interactions and found a surprising relationship dynamic
New research provides evidence that emotional intimacy and personal investment are strongly associated with commitment in online adult webcam relationships. The findings challenge the common assumption that these digitally mediated relationships are purely transactional exchanges based solely on financial payments. The new study was published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Online adult webcam platforms, commonly known as cam sites, feature live and interactive video broadcasts. Unlike pre-recorded adult videos, camming allows viewers to communicate with performers in real time. This interactive element provides opportunities for personal conversations, companionship, and shared sexual experiences. Millions of people interact on these platforms every day, making them a major arena for modern digital socialization.
Because money is exchanged for access to these live broadcasts, these connections are heavily rooted in commerce. Viewers pay for a performer’s time, and performers rely on this income to support themselves financially. These arrangements often challenge conventional boundaries between commercial services and personal affection. Performers sometimes provide what is known as the girlfriend experience, purposefully cultivating encounters that feature casual conversation and companionship rather than just physical performances.
Rhonda N. Balzarini, an assistant professor of psychology at Texas State University and a research fellow at the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, noticed a disconnect in how these platforms were often portrayed. She will be promoted to associate professor in September 2026. Balzarini explained that her team wanted to explore the reality of these digital connections.
“Digital intimacy is becoming an increasingly common part of people’s lives, yet we know surprisingly little about how these relationships actually function,” Balzarini said. “Camming platforms are one of the fastest-growing forms of online intimacy, with millions of people using them worldwide, but most research has focused on the sexual or commercial aspects of these interactions rather than the relationships that develop over time.”
To better understand how these digital bonds form and persist, the authors looked to a well-known psychological framework called the investment model of commitment processes. This framework suggests that people are more likely to stay in a relationship when they feel highly satisfied, have invested significant resources into the connection, and perceive that they have poor alternatives outside the relationship. In this context, resources can include time, money, and emotional energy.
“What fascinated us was that many cam models and members describe their interactions as extending beyond sex or financial exchange,” Balzarini noted. “Some report forming meaningful emotional connections, and even relationships that resemble romantic partnerships.”
This model relies on interdependence theory, a psychological concept suggesting that people evaluate relationships by weighing the perceived rewards against the perceived costs. When the rewards, such as pleasure, fulfillment, or emotional support, outweigh the costs, such as anxiety or financial expense, individuals tend to feel satisfied. They also compare their current situation to potential alternatives, such as dating someone else or being single.
Past studies have consistently supported this model in traditional romantic partnerships, friendships, and non-monogamous relationships. Very little is known about how these commitment processes operate in digital environments where interactions are paid for and physical contact is absent. Camming relationships present a specific dynamic because exclusivity is neither expected nor enforced by the platforms.
“As relationship scientists, we wanted to know whether the same psychological processes that keep traditional romantic relationships together also apply in this very different context,” Balzarini told PsyPost. “Are these relationships driven primarily by money and convenience, or do factors like satisfaction, investment, and intimacy also play a role?”
The researchers designed this study to see if the traditional investment model applies to online camming relationships. Because performers and viewers interact in a space where many other potential partners are readily available, the authors suspected that the perceived quality of alternatives might not matter as much as it does in exclusive relationships. Instead, they proposed that emotional intimacy might play a larger role in determining commitment.
To examine these dynamics, the researchers recruited participants from LiveJasmin, one of the most visited adult webcam platforms in the world. The study included two distinct groups of participants. The first group consisted of 544 paying members, the vast majority of whom were heterosexual men in their mid-forties. The second group consisted of 199 cam models, primarily heterosexual women in their early thirties.
The scientists recruited the paying members by displaying a brief pop-up advertisement that appeared after a user spent ten seconds on the website’s main directory. The cam models were invited to participate through an email newsletter distributed by the platform. The survey for members was offered in English, and the survey for models was translated into Romanian, Russian, and Spanish to accommodate the most common languages spoken by performers on the site.
Participants were not paired up as couples. They answered questions regarding the specific model or member they had interacted with for the longest period of time. Participants completed a digital survey that included brief, single-item questions derived from established psychological questionnaires. They rated their feelings on a seven-point scale, ranging from completely disagreeing to completely agreeing.
The survey asked participants to rate their relationship satisfaction, the amount of investment they had put into the connection, the quality of their alternative options, and their level of emotional intimacy. They were also asked to rate their current level of commitment to maintaining the relationship.
Finally, participants estimated future financial investments. Members were asked to project how much virtual currency, known on the platform as credits, they planned to spend on their preferred model in the coming month. Credits are purchased with real money and can be used for exclusive private shows or tipping.
In preliminary analyses, the researchers discovered that the paying members reported higher average levels of relationship satisfaction, investment, and intimacy than the cam models did. The members also rated their alternative options more highly than the models rated theirs. Despite these differences, the two groups reported equal levels of overall commitment to their connections.
“One of the biggest surprises was that many cam models, not just members, described their interactions as genuine relationships,” Balzarini said. “Public discussions often focus on members becoming emotionally attached, but our findings suggest that cam models also sometimes view these interactions as meaningful relationships rather than simply business transactions.”
The statistical analysis revealed that the quality of alternative partners did not significantly predict relationship commitment for either the models or the members. Even though participants had access to countless other people on the website, this availability did not weaken their dedication to their primary connection. The researchers found that dropping the concept of alternatives from their statistical model provided a better fit for the data.
Instead, the analysis showed that relationship satisfaction, personal investment, and emotional intimacy were all positively associated with commitment. When cam models and paying members reported higher levels of intimacy and satisfaction, they also tended to report stronger dedication to maintaining the relationship. For the paying members, the amount of resources they had already invested was a particularly strong predictor of their ongoing commitment.
“The effects were not trivial,” Balzarini explained. “They were actually quite large. Satisfaction, investment, and intimacy together explained about 68% of the differences in commitment among members and more than half of the differences in commitment among cam models, which is substantial for psychological research.”
She added that the researchers were surprised by how well the investment model applied to both groups. Among both members and cam models, greater satisfaction, investment, and intimacy were consistently associated with stronger commitment.
“The biggest takeaway is that these relationships are not simply transactional,” Balzarini said. “While financial exchange is certainly part of the interaction, emotional connection matters too. We found that intimacy was a key predictor of commitment, suggesting that many people aren’t just paying for content, they’re forming relationships that provide companionship, connection, and a sense of intimacy.”
This heightened commitment was also associated with future financial behavior. Through a statistical technique called path analysis, which tests relationships between multiple variables, the researchers found that members with higher levels of commitment intended to spend more money on their preferred model in the future. Similarly, highly committed models expected to receive greater financial investments from their preferred members.
Several limitations and potential misinterpretations should be considered when reviewing these findings. Balzarini warned against assuming that cam models become committed simply because they expect future financial investment.
“That is not what our study shows,” she said. “We found that for both members and cam models, greater satisfaction, investment, and intimacy were associated with greater commitment, and greater commitment was then associated with stronger expectations of future investment. In other words, anticipated future investment was associated with commitment, but our data do not tell us that it is the reason cam models become committed in the first place.”
The study utilized a cross-sectional design, meaning the researchers collected all the data at a single point in time. This approach makes it impossible to determine the direction of cause and effect. It remains unknown whether intimacy causes increased commitment or if committed individuals simply tend to develop deeper intimacy over time.
“More broadly, our study is correlational, so we cannot determine cause and effect,” Balzarini noted. “It is possible that greater commitment leads people to anticipate greater future investment, that anticipated investment strengthens commitment, or that both are influenced by other factors we did not measure.”
The researchers also pointed out that not every interaction on a camming platform develops into an emotionally meaningful relationship. Many participants described their interactions as casual rather than relational. The findings simply show that for a substantial subset of users who do form these relationships, commitment appears to be associated with many of the same factors that are important in other relationship contexts.
Another limitation involves the demographic makeup of the sample, which was primarily heterosexual and gender-conforming. Future studies would benefit from including a more diverse range of sexual orientations and gender identities to see if these patterns hold true across different communities. The study also relied entirely on self-reported data, which can sometimes be influenced by personal biases or poor memory.
“This study is really just a starting point,” Balzarini said. “One of our biggest priorities is conducting longitudinal research to understand how these relationships develop over time. Because our data were collected at a single point in time, we cannot determine how commitment evolves or whether satisfaction, investment, and intimacy change as these relationships grow or dissolve.”
Balzarini expressed a desire to study cam models and members who are actually interacting with one another. By recruiting matched pairs rather than independent samples of models and members, researchers could better understand how each person’s experiences influence the other. She also hopes to explore the broader impacts of these platforms.
“Another important next step is understanding how introducing digital intimacy into people’s lives affects well-being,” she said. “For example, we are interested in following individuals with no prior experience using camming platforms to examine how beginning to use these platforms influences mental health, relationship quality, loneliness, and well-being over time.”
Future studies might explore whether digitally mediated intimacy could complement therapeutic approaches for individuals with physical disabilities, social anxiety, or high rejection sensitivity. Balzarini is also interested in the potential implications for body image. Preliminary research suggests that positive interactions in these digital spaces may improve body image and body acceptance for some individuals.
“Ultimately, my broader goal is to understand how technology is reshaping intimacy,” Balzarini explained. “Rather than assuming digital relationships are inherently good or bad, I think the more important scientific question is identifying who benefits, under what circumstances, and why.”
She expressed gratitude to the members and cam models from LiveJasmin who volunteered their time to participate in the research. She noted that studies like this are only possible because people are willing to share honest accounts of their experiences.
“I also hope this study encourages people to approach digital intimacy with curiosity rather than assumptions,” Balzarini concluded. “Whether people ultimately view these relationships positively or negatively, understanding them through careful scientific research is far more informative than relying on stereotypes or preconceived notions.”
The study, “Beyond the Transaction: Commitment, Intimacy, and Investment in Online Camming Relationships,” was authored by Rhonda N. Balzarini, Taylor Himes, Faith Swanson, Brandi Reynolds, and Christopher R. Agnew.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DigitalIntimacy #OnlineCamming #CamModels #RelationshipCommitment #InvestmentModel #EmotionalIntimacy #LiveJasmin #ArchivesOfSexualBehavior #ModernRelationships #WebcamRelationships
-
💙 What makes a chatbot feel like a romantic partner?
In her first publication, Paula Ebner explores romantic human-chatbot relationships together with Dr. Jessica Szczuka.
The article was published in Technology, Mind, and Behavior and is part of INTITEC’s research on digital intimacy, trust, and human-AI relationships.
🔗 https://rc-trust.ai/news/news-detail/falling-for-code-was-not-the-plan
#DigitalIntimacy #HumanAIInteraction #AICompanions -
Survey suggests sexting is changing modern relationships
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://nerds.xyz/2026/05/sexting-modern-relationships-survey/
-
Can AI reduce loneliness? 🤖💙
In „Unser Leben mit KI - Nie wieder einsam?“,
Paula Ebner shows why emotional bonds with AI feel natural 🧠–and where risks begin ⚖️
What’s your view? 💭
👉 https://rc-trust.ai/news/news-detail/when-ai-feels-like-a-real-companion
#AI #DigitalIntimacy #AIEthics -
What happens when AI becomes emotionally close? 🤖💙
At #SaferInternetDay 2026, over 50,000 students discussed “KI and me. In künstlicher Beziehung.”
Psychologist Paula Ebner explained why bonding with chatbots feels natural 🧠–and why we must stay aware of data, design, and corporate interests ⚖️
Digital intimacy needs reflection, research & responsibility.
How do you see AI companions evolving?
#DigitalIntimacy #AIethics #MediaEducation #Psychology #ResearchImpact
Photo:klicksafe/Axel Heiter
-
Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed eroticism
https://lux-magazine.com/article/privacy-eroticism/
#HackerNews #BringingSexyBack #InternetSurveillance #PrivacyEroticism #DigitalIntimacy #OnlinePrivacy
-
Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed eroticism
https://lux-magazine.com/article/privacy-eroticism/
#HackerNews #BringingSexyBack #InternetSurveillance #PrivacyEroticism #DigitalIntimacy #OnlinePrivacy
-
You don’t need shame—you need security.
I wrote a no-judgment, real-world guide to protecting your nudes in the age of surveillance tech.
From EXIF data to cloud backups to what happens after you hit send—this is for anyone who’s ever been hot, smart, and online.
-
You don’t need shame—you need security.
I wrote a no-judgment, real-world guide to protecting your nudes in the age of surveillance tech.
From EXIF data to cloud backups to what happens after you hit send—this is for anyone who’s ever been hot, smart, and online.
-
SecretDesires.ai revolutionizes digital companionship with AI girlfriends offering personalized, emotionally intelligent connections for those seeking meaningful interaction #AICompanions #DigitalIntimacy
-
You don’t need to sext for your phone to expose your sex life.
Period trackers. Bluetooth toys. Location history.
Even your flashlight app might be collecting more than you realize.📌 Turn off unnecessary permissions
📌 Use privacy-first apps (like Drip, not Flo)
📌 Your body, your data, your rules. -
You don’t need to sext for your phone to expose your sex life.
Period trackers. Bluetooth toys. Location history.
Even your flashlight app might be collecting more than you realize.📌 Turn off unnecessary permissions
📌 Use privacy-first apps (like Drip, not Flo)
📌 Your body, your data, your rules. -
I'm contributing to "Let's talk about UX"-meetup at #Thoughtworks #Cologne with some discussion starters around #digitalintimacy
Sign up here: https://www.meetup.com/de-DE/thoughtworks_koeln/events/296676137/
-
I'm contributing to "Let's talk about UX"-meetup at #Thoughtworks #Cologne with some discussion starters around #digitalintimacy
Sign up here: https://www.meetup.com/de-DE/thoughtworks_koeln/events/296676137/