home.social

#cortexa55 — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #cortexa55, aggregated by home.social.

  1. A #RISCV Progress Check: Benchmarking #P550 and #C910
    The RISC-V cores fall short of Ar #CortexA73 and well short of Intel’s #Goldmont Plus. Mediatek’s In-Order #Genio1200 hyas higher clock speeds and better DRAM latency than C910 and P550. Its #CortexA55 cores are able to catch C910 and P550 without out-of-order execution.
    #SiFive’s P550 and T-HEAD’s Xuantie C910 are both notable for featuring out-of-order execution on RISC-V. Both are plagued by low clock speeds.
    chipsandcheese.com/p/a-risc-v-

  2. A #RISCV Progress Check: Benchmarking #P550 and #C910
    The RISC-V cores fall short of Ar #CortexA73 and well short of Intel’s #Goldmont Plus. Mediatek’s In-Order #Genio1200 hyas higher clock speeds and better DRAM latency than C910 and P550. Its #CortexA55 cores are able to catch C910 and P550 without out-of-order execution.
    #SiFive’s P550 and T-HEAD’s Xuantie C910 are both notable for featuring out-of-order execution on RISC-V. Both are plagued by low clock speeds.
    chipsandcheese.com/p/a-risc-v-

  3. A Progress Check: Benchmarking and
    The RISC-V cores fall short of Ar and well short of Intel’s Plus. Mediatek’s In-Order hyas higher clock speeds and better DRAM latency than C910 and P550. Its cores are able to catch C910 and P550 without out-of-order execution.
    ’s P550 and T-HEAD’s Xuantie C910 are both notable for featuring out-of-order execution on RISC-V. Both are plagued by low clock speeds.
    chipsandcheese.com/p/a-risc-v-

  4. A #RISCV Progress Check: Benchmarking #P550 and #C910
    The RISC-V cores fall short of Ar #CortexA73 and well short of Intel’s #Goldmont Plus. Mediatek’s In-Order #Genio1200 hyas higher clock speeds and better DRAM latency than C910 and P550. Its #CortexA55 cores are able to catch C910 and P550 without out-of-order execution.
    #SiFive’s P550 and T-HEAD’s Xuantie C910 are both notable for featuring out-of-order execution on RISC-V. Both are plagued by low clock speeds.
    chipsandcheese.com/p/a-risc-v-

  5. A #RISCV Progress Check: Benchmarking #P550 and #C910
    The RISC-V cores fall short of Ar #CortexA73 and well short of Intel’s #Goldmont Plus. Mediatek’s In-Order #Genio1200 hyas higher clock speeds and better DRAM latency than C910 and P550. Its #CortexA55 cores are able to catch C910 and P550 without out-of-order execution.
    #SiFive’s P550 and T-HEAD’s Xuantie C910 are both notable for featuring out-of-order execution on RISC-V. Both are plagued by low clock speeds.
    chipsandcheese.com/p/a-risc-v-

  6. Moreover, it appears that TMo are using the #Fibocom FG360-NA-03 specifically as seen in aforementioned datasheet. The difference with the FG360-NA-00 and FG360-NA-05 versions is that their datasheet lists "driver" as “Linux 4.1” instead of OpenWRT for the -03 spec. Main difference between all of them seems to be supported wireless bands as they apply to the carrier. The -03 variety for TMo appears to support a bunch more bands (TMo + Sprint) as a result. The #MT6890 AP is a #CortexA55, for completeness sake.