#climatejournalism — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #climatejournalism, aggregated by home.social.
-
RE: https://aus.social/@keira_reckons/116815200024953609
A good guide for #climateJournalism, especially #photographers. Could be also helpfull for #bloggers.
-
RE: https://aus.social/@keira_reckons/116815200024953609
A good guide for #climateJournalism, especially #photographers. Could be also helpfull for #bloggers.
-
CUT AND PASTE IN CASE OF JOURNALISTIC MALPRACTICE #EndClimateSilence #ABCNews #ClimateJournalism #ClimateChange
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:jeuzjfwsgn62xfoe7qo4jul5/post/3moxnwil5cc2f -
CUT AND PASTE IN CASE OF JOURNALISTIC MALPRACTICE #EndClimateSilence #ABCNews #ClimateJournalism #ClimateChange
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:jeuzjfwsgn62xfoe7qo4jul5/post/3moxnwil5cc2f -
We’re continuing our WiSo-Wishes series with Clara Pfeffer, Climate Journalist at RTL 💚🎓
As we celebrate 125 years of WiSo 🎉, her journey shows how curiosity and interdisciplinary thinking shape impactful journalism 🌍🗞️
💚 Celebrate with us: https://uni.koeln/4QPJK
-
The biggest climate stories often aren’t labelled ‘climate’ – so newsrooms miss them
#Environment #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateJournalism #UKPolitics #NetZero #EnergyPolicy #MediaBias #Journalism #ClimateChange #ClimateReporting #GreenTransition #The14
https://the-14.com/the-biggest-climate-stories-often-arent-labelled-climate-so-newsrooms-miss-them/ -
The biggest climate stories often aren’t labelled ‘climate’ – so newsrooms miss them
#Environment #Climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateJournalism #UKPolitics #NetZero #EnergyPolicy #MediaBias #Journalism #ClimateChange #ClimateReporting #GreenTransition #The14
https://the-14.com/the-biggest-climate-stories-often-arent-labelled-climate-so-newsrooms-miss-them/ -
This specific article has some badly structured wording in places. Better care is called for. I had to go back several times re-reading the confusing sentence "At least one congressional Republican is ready to take action in the face of increasing extreme weather events. " to realize this wasn't a change in pattern but rather a CONTINUATION of GOP broken policy by Marjorie Taylor Green (MTG).
If we are going to tell this story, it needs to be told with clarity. It is important to NOT just toss in these details as if they are stories that tell themselves. False narratives have been told that require careful unwinding. The fact of extreme weather events is an opportunity to say "there is an objective way to see who is telling the truth here".
Another part of this story we have to get better at telling is the part about probabilities. A lot of people are not good at math, but they still should intuitively understand the important parts if it's explained well:
People sometimes say of bad weather "well, that sometimes happens. even extreme events sometimes happen". That's true of gambling situations, too. There are low-probability events that do happen. But it's very different to say you know that an otherwise low-probability event is going to happen, that is, to be able to say "I will now roll double-sixes three times in a row." While it can happen that you do, if you say it's going to happen, one starts to suspect that it's not just random, that maybe it's the dice.
In this case, the effect is all that carbon pollution having an effect. It's what scientists have been predicting.
MTG offers the preposterous alternate explanation of weather being controlled by adverse political forces, but she is still speaking to the set of people who can tell something is amiss and demand an explanation. News media has hammered these stories into a segment of our population, and it cannot be taken for granted that people will suddenly see the folly of it. More careful hand-holding is essential.
The GOP and its associated propaganda sources have become an engine for offering bizarre conspiracy theories, but the Dems are the party of offering little or no narrative at all and assuming that the gaps will be filled by common sense. That's just not enough.
#Climate #ClimateReporting #ClimateJournalism #journalism #politics #USPolitics #ExtremeWeather #propaganda
-
This specific article has some badly structured wording in places. Better care is called for. I had to go back several times re-reading the confusing sentence "At least one congressional Republican is ready to take action in the face of increasing extreme weather events. " to realize this wasn't a change in pattern but rather a CONTINUATION of GOP broken policy by Marjorie Taylor Green (MTG).
If we are going to tell this story, it needs to be told with clarity. It is important to NOT just toss in these details as if they are stories that tell themselves. False narratives have been told that require careful unwinding. The fact of extreme weather events is an opportunity to say "there is an objective way to see who is telling the truth here".
Another part of this story we have to get better at telling is the part about probabilities. A lot of people are not good at math, but they still should intuitively understand the important parts if it's explained well:
People sometimes say of bad weather "well, that sometimes happens. even extreme events sometimes happen". That's true of gambling situations, too. There are low-probability events that do happen. But it's very different to say you know that an otherwise low-probability event is going to happen, that is, to be able to say "I will now roll double-sixes three times in a row." While it can happen that you do, if you say it's going to happen, one starts to suspect that it's not just random, that maybe it's the dice.
In this case, the effect is all that carbon pollution having an effect. It's what scientists have been predicting.
MTG offers the preposterous alternate explanation of weather being controlled by adverse political forces, but she is still speaking to the set of people who can tell something is amiss and demand an explanation. News media has hammered these stories into a segment of our population, and it cannot be taken for granted that people will suddenly see the folly of it. More careful hand-holding is essential.
The GOP and its associated propaganda sources have become an engine for offering bizarre conspiracy theories, but the Dems are the party of offering little or no narrative at all and assuming that the gaps will be filled by common sense. That's just not enough.
#Climate #ClimateReporting #ClimateJournalism #journalism #politics #USPolitics #ExtremeWeather #propaganda
-
@MelissaBenyon Yes, without key pieces of context for that very misleading final quote:
“This [North West Shelf] project is subject to those reforms, which means this plant is required to bring their emissions down each year and reach net zero by 2050 under the safeguard mechanism.”
Context: by "their emissions", the (unnamed) government spokesperson does *not* include the >4b tonnes of CO2 emissions that will result when the gas extracted from the project is burned (called 'scope 3 emissions' in technical jargon), and is only referring the (far smaller) emissions that result from the extraction process itself. However, most readers of the article are unlikely to be aware of this crucial distinction and so miss the verbal sleight of hand at play.
Also missing: even these latter emissions are very likely underestimated by current Australian government methods of accounting for gas extraction, which are not based on the latest research into the scale of methane leakage that occurs during extraction, processing and transport of #FossilGas.
Also also missing: the safeguard mechanism allows #Woodside to 'reduce' 'their emissions' via dodgy #CarbonOffset scams that frequently fail to do anything like what is claimed on the tin.
#Auspol #ClimateJournalism #NorthWestShelf #DirtyEnergy -
@MelissaBenyon Yes, without key pieces of context for that very misleading final quote:
“This [North West Shelf] project is subject to those reforms, which means this plant is required to bring their emissions down each year and reach net zero by 2050 under the safeguard mechanism.”
Context: by "their emissions", the (unnamed) government spokesperson does *not* include the >4b tonnes of CO2 emissions that will result when the gas extracted from the project is burned (called 'scope 3 emissions' in technical jargon), and is only referring the (far smaller) emissions that result from the extraction process itself. However, most readers of the article are unlikely to be aware of this crucial distinction and so miss the verbal sleight of hand at play.
Also missing: even these latter emissions are very likely underestimated by current Australian government methods of accounting for gas extraction, which are not based on the latest research into the scale of methane leakage that occurs during extraction, processing and transport of #FossilGas.
Also also missing: the safeguard mechanism allows #Woodside to 'reduce' 'their emissions' via dodgy #CarbonOffset scams that frequently fail to do anything like what is claimed on the tin.
#Auspol #ClimateJournalism #NorthWestShelf #DirtyEnergy -
Excellent more in-depth reporting on attempts to re-plant burnt forest areas in the USA https://apnews.com/article/wildfires-forests-disappearing-climate-change-replanting-74c5ada85dcbe64d2972a15f2d5b4710
Whether or not a mountain is home to a forest decides the water availability for agriculture irrigation in the lower land throughout the year. But much of the burnt area in the Rockies doesn't grow back even 20years after a #wildfire - and grassy mountains don't store rain or the water from snow melt.
The challenges for natural regrowth of the former biome are the increasing drought periods and temperatures, and that some burnt areas are too huge for natural spreading of seeds.
Not mentioned but I think relevant: lost top soil = soil no longer kept in place by roots is washed away in the increasing number heavy rain events thanks to #climatechange .Replanting of burnt area has been done in the USA for decades. But because of the increase in area burnt, paired with fewer resources for the effort, the backlog is piling up into unfeasibility.
Have come across a number of good climate-related articles on AP in recent months, and not too US-bellybutton either. Now thinking, I should set up a regular donation for their #climatejournalism !
-
Maybe that's what the article set out to say, and I admit I only skimmed it, but I didn't feel like either the article or the underlying research paper went to this question in any real detail.
As far as I could tell, and I might be very wrong here, but I'm saying this out loud so that someone who knows better can correct me if they want to, and maybe I'll learn something: the paper is full of stuff that sounds to me like saying we worked through a lot of differential equation modeling and it is what it is. They seem to be saying there was a diminished probability going forward, but that they weren't sure how to qualitatively assess what was causing the problem. There was a lot of general stuff about stay the course and keep working on this stuff even though we can't prove anything.
Personally, and I am neither a physicist nor mathematician, so take that into account, it seems to me that it comes down to this (which career experts are also welcome to correct if they'd like):
Global warming introduces energy into the system, but not uniformly because they are different issues of reflectivity and atmospheric composition at each point, and because albedo is causing differential buffering. So you get a lot of swirling, which is chaotic and probabilistic, but not entirely random at the macro level. Clearly the oceans are absorbing a lot of heat wear land masses are not. And so the net effect is differential heating in different places, and an overall upward global trend, but quite a lot of difference in detail. Mathematically, to have an average, you have to have a lot of stuff on one side and a lot of stuff on the other side, assuming you don't have uniform sameness, so it's mathematically impossible to see anomalies like the arctic the 20 or 30°C above normal without something being substantially below normal unless the average goes up by that same 20 or 30, which it has not.
So it seems inevitable to me that until/unless it all sames out, super high temperatures have to be matched by super low ones. And it makes sense that the division of labor is that the oceans, which have been doing us the favor of absorbing a truckload of heat, are going to have the biggest temperature anomalies, and land masses have to take up the mathematical slack. Presumably, and I'm just guessing, anything from bodies of water like lakes, to reflective surfaces like deserts or glaciers, to mountains that create deflections in wind flow, etc. create the chaotic impediments to everything just leveling out. But mostly there's going to be an excess of heat over water and statistically increasing but still less in absolute terms over land.
The heat thing seems to be accelerating so much that a differential may not matter so much going forward too far. But for now it seems unsurprising.
Anyway I could be wrong in all of this, but if so I would appreciate a climate scientist saying where. The real reason that I'm saying this, though, is to illustrate the level at which I wish climate scientists would talk. I get why mathematical modeling is complex, but regular people can't do anything with that information. It needs to be translated into something that is within reach of ordinary people to understand. So if not these specific words, words of this kind would be helpful.
At least in the form I've described it, there's no paradox at all to be resolved. It would be a paradox if (as in the opening sequence to every Prairie Home Companion, where all the kids are above average), there were gigantic upward anomalies and no gigantic downward ones. Math requires otherwise. So I don't even know what this article was trying to tell me, but I don't think it did what it said it was going to do.
-
Maybe that's what the article set out to say, and I admit I only skimmed it, but I didn't feel like either the article or the underlying research paper went to this question in any real detail.
As far as I could tell, and I might be very wrong here, but I'm saying this out loud so that someone who knows better can correct me if they want to, and maybe I'll learn something: the paper is full of stuff that sounds to me like saying we worked through a lot of differential equation modeling and it is what it is. They seem to be saying there was a diminished probability going forward, but that they weren't sure how to qualitatively assess what was causing the problem. There was a lot of general stuff about stay the course and keep working on this stuff even though we can't prove anything.
Personally, and I am neither a physicist nor mathematician, so take that into account, it seems to me that it comes down to this (which career experts are also welcome to correct if they'd like):
Global warming introduces energy into the system, but not uniformly because they are different issues of reflectivity and atmospheric composition at each point, and because albedo is causing differential buffering. So you get a lot of swirling, which is chaotic and probabilistic, but not entirely random at the macro level. Clearly the oceans are absorbing a lot of heat wear land masses are not. And so the net effect is differential heating in different places, and an overall upward global trend, but quite a lot of difference in detail. Mathematically, to have an average, you have to have a lot of stuff on one side and a lot of stuff on the other side, assuming you don't have uniform sameness, so it's mathematically impossible to see anomalies like the arctic the 20 or 30°C above normal without something being substantially below normal unless the average goes up by that same 20 or 30, which it has not.
So it seems inevitable to me that until/unless it all sames out, super high temperatures have to be matched by super low ones. And it makes sense that the division of labor is that the oceans, which have been doing us the favor of absorbing a truckload of heat, are going to have the biggest temperature anomalies, and land masses have to take up the mathematical slack. Presumably, and I'm just guessing, anything from bodies of water like lakes, to reflective surfaces like deserts or glaciers, to mountains that create deflections in wind flow, etc. create the chaotic impediments to everything just leveling out. But mostly there's going to be an excess of heat over water and statistically increasing but still less in absolute terms over land.
The heat thing seems to be accelerating so much that a differential may not matter so much going forward too far. But for now it seems unsurprising.
Anyway I could be wrong in all of this, but if so I would appreciate a climate scientist saying where. The real reason that I'm saying this, though, is to illustrate the level at which I wish climate scientists would talk. I get why mathematical modeling is complex, but regular people can't do anything with that information. It needs to be translated into something that is within reach of ordinary people to understand. So if not these specific words, words of this kind would be helpful.
At least in the form I've described it, there's no paradox at all to be resolved. It would be a paradox if (as in the opening sequence to every Prairie Home Companion, where all the kids are above average), there were gigantic upward anomalies and no gigantic downward ones. Math requires otherwise. So I don't even know what this article was trying to tell me, but I don't think it did what it said it was going to do.
-
"A tiny minority of our readers understand that solar and wind power are now the cheapest power on earth. They still think of them as the Whole Foods of energy, when in reality they’re the Costco—cheap, and available in bulk.
This misunderstanding is not for lack of great environmental reporters.
But all the great reporting can’t create a new reality. That takes editors willing to repeat these things constantly"
https://www.cjr.org/analysis/bill-mckibben-climate-journalism-election-temperatures-missed.php
#ClimateJournalism -
"A tiny minority of our readers understand that solar and wind power are now the cheapest power on earth. They still think of them as the Whole Foods of energy, when in reality they’re the Costco—cheap, and available in bulk.
This misunderstanding is not for lack of great environmental reporters.
But all the great reporting can’t create a new reality. That takes editors willing to repeat these things constantly"
https://www.cjr.org/analysis/bill-mckibben-climate-journalism-election-temperatures-missed.php
#ClimateJournalism -
#Opportunity for journalists working on climate justice in the Caribbean (boosts for reach are welcome):
Caribbean Climate Justice Journalism Fellowship (applications open until April 22nd). This Fellowship aims to empower and support dedicated climate journalists across the Caribbean region to effectively report on climate justice issues: https://climatetrackercaribbean.org/climate-justice/caribbean-climate-justice-fellowship-applications-open
#Journalism #ClimateAction #Caribbean #Journalist #AmWriting #ClimateJustice #ClimateJournalism #ClimateCrisis
-
As World Saw Hottest Year on Record, Corporate News Cut Coverage
"We need more climate journalism, not less," said one Media Matters for America writer.
Jessica Corbett
Mar 14, 2024"Last year featured not only what scientists worldwide confirmed was the hottest year in human history but also a 25% drop in corporate broadcast networks' coverage of the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency, according to an analysis released Thursday.
"#MediaMatters for America, which has long tracked television networks' climate coverage, reviewed transcripts and video databases for ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox Broadcasting Co. The watchdog found that in 2023, despite the worsening global crisis, the networks collectively had just 1,032 minutes of coverage, down from 1,374 minutes in 2022 and 1,316 minutes in 2021.
"That amounts to less than 1% of all corporate broadcast coverage aired last year, notes the analysis authored by Media Matters senior writer Evlondo Cooper with contributions from Allison Fisher, director of the group's climate and energy program."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/climate-journalism
#IndependentNews #SupportIndependentJournalism #ClimateJournalism #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #CorporateMedia
-
As World Saw Hottest Year on Record, Corporate News Cut Coverage
"We need more climate journalism, not less," said one Media Matters for America writer.
Jessica Corbett
Mar 14, 2024"Last year featured not only what scientists worldwide confirmed was the hottest year in human history but also a 25% drop in corporate broadcast networks' coverage of the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency, according to an analysis released Thursday.
"#MediaMatters for America, which has long tracked television networks' climate coverage, reviewed transcripts and video databases for ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox Broadcasting Co. The watchdog found that in 2023, despite the worsening global crisis, the networks collectively had just 1,032 minutes of coverage, down from 1,374 minutes in 2022 and 1,316 minutes in 2021.
"That amounts to less than 1% of all corporate broadcast coverage aired last year, notes the analysis authored by Media Matters senior writer Evlondo Cooper with contributions from Allison Fisher, director of the group's climate and energy program."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/climate-journalism
#IndependentNews #SupportIndependentJournalism #ClimateJournalism #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #CorporateMedia
-
I'm truly honoured to be elected to the @meaa National Council's media section, and will do all I can to support and protect Australian journalism, especially freelance and science/environment journalism. Thanks to everyone who put their trust in me.
#journalism #ScienceJournalism #ClimateJournalism #reporting #unions -
I'm truly honoured to be elected to the @meaa National Council's media section, and will do all I can to support and protect Australian journalism, especially freelance and science/environment journalism. Thanks to everyone who put their trust in me.
#journalism #ScienceJournalism #ClimateJournalism #reporting #unions -
#ClimateChange #Journalism #ClimateJournalism #Media #News #Newspapers: "When the Reuters Institute set up the OCJN, we pitched our tent beyond the traditional domains of climate teams. Everyone was welcome. In the past two years, journalists from all parts of the newsroom have accepted our call, both reflecting and expanding the evolving nature of climate journalism.
We do have climate-focused journalists joining our cohorts, from Bloomberg Green managing editor Sharon Chen to Phil Watanabe, an environment reporter at Folha de S. Paulo. But we’ve also had the likes of Taimas Szirniks, transport correspondent at AFP, Giulia Sadelli, political correspondent at Deutsche Welle, and Agatha Gichana, a reporter covering gender at Nation. We’ve had photojournalists, heads of news and political editors, sports reporters and TV presenters. The scope of climate journalism is truly growing beyond its usual silos."
-
#ClimateChange #Journalism #ClimateJournalism #Media #News #Newspapers: "When the Reuters Institute set up the OCJN, we pitched our tent beyond the traditional domains of climate teams. Everyone was welcome. In the past two years, journalists from all parts of the newsroom have accepted our call, both reflecting and expanding the evolving nature of climate journalism.
We do have climate-focused journalists joining our cohorts, from Bloomberg Green managing editor Sharon Chen to Phil Watanabe, an environment reporter at Folha de S. Paulo. But we’ve also had the likes of Taimas Szirniks, transport correspondent at AFP, Giulia Sadelli, political correspondent at Deutsche Welle, and Agatha Gichana, a reporter covering gender at Nation. We’ve had photojournalists, heads of news and political editors, sports reporters and TV presenters. The scope of climate journalism is truly growing beyond its usual silos."
-
If you're putting together end-of-year #climatejournalism, remember that we've published fantastic stories on impacts on physical and mental health, compelling first person stories and deep analysis of #climatesolutions of all kinds. All ready to use + remix!
-
If you're putting together end-of-year #climatejournalism, remember that we've published fantastic stories on impacts on physical and mental health, compelling first person stories and deep analysis of #climatesolutions of all kinds. All ready to use + remix!
-
CNBC's climate desk has been shut down after 2.5 years as part of wider headcount reductions.
-
CNBC's climate desk has been shut down after 2.5 years as part of wider headcount reductions.
-
Our newest blog post, "Climate Change is a Menta lHealth Issue (and part of a solarpunk present....)" is live! Ariel writes about the imperative for journalists / essayist to acknowledge that published articles on climate change should include a list of resources (like articles on mental health) for readers to act on after reading.
It has been proven time and again that #action is what helps many humans mitigate climate despair and eco-anxiety, and Ariel argues that we have a duty of care to provide those tools to people.
What do you do to mitigate your own negative #climate emotions? Let us know in the comments.
https://www.solarpunkpresents.com/blog/8f07hozy9a4b5d3e62h14l1qi4jvp7
@arielkroon #hopepunk #climateanxiety #activism #volunteering #duty #journalism #ClimateJournalism
#solarpunk #solarpunkPresents #climateChange climate #climateGrief #climateAnxietyv#ecoGrief #ecoAnxiety #mentalHealth #journalism #volunteering #activism -
Our newest blog post, "Climate Change is a Menta lHealth Issue (and part of a solarpunk present....)" is live! Ariel writes about the imperative for journalists / essayist to acknowledge that published articles on climate change should include a list of resources (like articles on mental health) for readers to act on after reading.
It has been proven time and again that #action is what helps many humans mitigate climate despair and eco-anxiety, and Ariel argues that we have a duty of care to provide those tools to people.
What do you do to mitigate your own negative #climate emotions? Let us know in the comments.
https://www.solarpunkpresents.com/blog/8f07hozy9a4b5d3e62h14l1qi4jvp7
@arielkroon #hopepunk #climateanxiety #activism #volunteering #duty #journalism #ClimateJournalism
#solarpunk #solarpunkPresents #climateChange climate #climateGrief #climateAnxietyv#ecoGrief #ecoAnxiety #mentalHealth #journalism #volunteering #activism -
And in a fantastic followup to this – Ketan Joshi has done a bit of analysis into the stories that the #Walkey awards choose as winners....
Here's the key bit:
"...from what I can tell – using a somewhat clumsy method of keyword searching – the only award granted to a dedicated climate story was handed out in 2008, to a Four Corners episode about the impact of climate change on sea ice. Fifteen years ago.
There are a range of stories, photographs and book awards granted to coverage of climate-intensified disasters, where it’s unclear whether climate change is central or even mentioned – bushfires and floods, in particular, like the photograph above Ampol’s logo above."
https://ketanjoshi.co/2023/08/30/the-walkleys-walkout/#climate #journalism #globalwarming #auspol #fossilfuels #AMPOL #cartoonist #awards #climatejournalism
-
The @republik_magazin (independent ad free journalism) has published a summary edition of articles of their project "Klimalabor" which started at the beginning of the year. (only in German)
Have fun reading 🙂
-
The @republik_magazin (independent ad free journalism) has published a summary edition of articles of their project "Klimalabor" which started at the beginning of the year. (only in German)
Have fun reading 🙂
-
A new hire and new freelance writing opps at @postscriptpods
#climatetech #climatejournalism #journalismjobs -
I loved learning about another #climatejournalism class, this one at Harvard Extension School and taught by Robert Frederick.
Nieman Reports: "Why #ClimateChange Stories Need More Context
Reporters covering climate change should combine traditional and #solutionsjournalism approaches to provide more depth":
https://niemanreports.org/articles/climate-reporting-responsibly/ -
I loved learning about another #climatejournalism class, this one at Harvard Extension School and taught by Robert Frederick.
Nieman Reports: "Why #ClimateChange Stories Need More Context
Reporters covering climate change should combine traditional and #solutionsjournalism approaches to provide more depth":
https://niemanreports.org/articles/climate-reporting-responsibly/ -
@thetyee: "We’re Losing Journalists. And PR Jobs Are Rising
The state of #CanadianMedia in four graphs, according to new census data.
"While there are alternatives to #CorporateMedia on the rise, journalists are also “fighting a rearguard against the forces of misinformation and disinformation,” says #SeanHolman, a professor of environmental and #ClimateJournalism at the #UniversityOfVictoria."
-
@thetyee: "We’re Losing Journalists. And PR Jobs Are Rising
The state of #CanadianMedia in four graphs, according to new census data.
"While there are alternatives to #CorporateMedia on the rise, journalists are also “fighting a rearguard against the forces of misinformation and disinformation,” says #SeanHolman, a professor of environmental and #ClimateJournalism at the #UniversityOfVictoria."
-
#CoveringClimateNow: "The #WashingtonPost Goes Big on #Climate
"This is a landmark week for #ClimateJournalism, as one of the world’s most influential news organizations, The Washington Post, announced a dramatic expansion of its climate coverage. “We have nearly tripled the size of our Climate team — totaling more than 30 journalists — part of a newsroom-wide commitment to covering perhaps the century’s biggest story”
#ClimateNews #ClimateEmergency
https://coveringclimatenow.org/climate-beat-story/the-washington-post-goes-big-on-climate/
-
#CoveringClimateNow: "The #WashingtonPost Goes Big on #Climate
"This is a landmark week for #ClimateJournalism, as one of the world’s most influential news organizations, The Washington Post, announced a dramatic expansion of its climate coverage. “We have nearly tripled the size of our Climate team — totaling more than 30 journalists — part of a newsroom-wide commitment to covering perhaps the century’s biggest story”
#ClimateNews #ClimateEmergency
https://coveringclimatenow.org/climate-beat-story/the-washington-post-goes-big-on-climate/
-
@nielsmede Ping @kringlevaelling - maybe useful for your PhD on #climatejournalism.
-
@nielsmede Ping @kringlevaelling - maybe useful for your PhD on #climatejournalism.
