home.social

#b52bomber — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #b52bomber, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. New flight tracking data shows the B-52 bomber that crashed at Edwards Air Force Base made a sharp turn and descended rapidly before impact. All eight people on board were killed as investigators probe the cause. english.mathrubhumi.com/news/w #PlaneCrash #Aviation #B52Bomber #UnitedStates

  2. Eight people were killed after a US Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber crashed moments after takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base in Southern California during a routine test mission. english.mathrubhumi.com/news/w #PlaneCrash #B52Bomber #UnitedStates #Aviation

  3. Live: B-52 crash site at Andrews Air Force base, CA

    Eight crew members are dead in a B-52 bomber crash shortly after takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base, northeast of Los Angeles, on Monday morning, the base said. The B-52 Stratofortress was on a routine test mission that took off at 11:20 a.m. local time at the remote air base, officials said, and “initial indications are that the crash was not survivable.” Watch more CNN here: #Crash #b52bomber #News

    fllics.com/en/video/live-b-52-

  4. Live: B-52 crash site at Andrews Air Force base, CA

    Eight crew members are dead in a B-52 bomber crash shortly after takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base, northeast of Los Angeles, on Monday morning, the base said. The B-52 Stratofortress was on a routine test mission that took off at 11:20 a.m. local time at the remote air base, officials said, and “initial indications are that the crash was not survivable.” Watch more CNN here: #Crash #b52bomber #News

    fllics.com/en/video/live-b-52-

  5. US Continues to Rely on Upgraded B-52 Bombers from the 1960s for Modern Conflicts, Including Strikes on Iran

    📰 Original title: The B-52: Why the US still uses a plane from the 1960s to bomb its enemies

    🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
    👥 Usuarios: It's clickbait ⚠️

    View full AI summary: killbait.com/en/us-continues-t

    #conflict #b52bomber #usairforce...

  6. @TerryHancock

    My favourite #debunking of the "government paid $EXCESSIVE for $THING" kind of story was by Jerry #Pournelle. It's currently offline, and archive.org is still recovering, so I can't link it. Actual numbers below are made up because I don't remember the exact figures, but the gist is correct.

    It was the "#Pentagon paid $17,000 for a #toilet seat" one. What actually happened was that the Pentagon needed to procure more toilet seats for the B-52 bomber - the planes were (and still are!) old and stuff wears out or gets damaged. There was no remaining stock of parts.

    The problem was that the #manufacturer had long ago junked the tooling used to make the parts (they were metal, requiring tool & die etc). Making that tooling is quite expensive - it's difficult, skilled work. Other costs involved in getting a #manufacturing line set up are also expensive. And they couldn't justify buying and storing tons of extra toilet seats.

    So what you get is a high fixed #cost to rebuild a line, divided by a relatively small number of finished articles, giving an apparently absurd price per unit. Say, a million dollars to make 60 replacement toilet seats to original spec.

    And that gives... $16,667 per seat. And a great, totally #misleading #headline.

    #B52 #B52Bomber #ToiletSeat #GovernmentWaste #waste #procurement

  7. @TerryHancock

    My favourite #debunking of the "government paid $EXCESSIVE for $THING" kind of story was by Jerry #Pournelle. It's currently offline, and archive.org is still recovering, so I can't link it. Actual numbers below are made up because I don't remember the exact figures, but the gist is correct.

    It was the "#Pentagon paid $17,000 for a #toilet seat" one. What actually happened was that the Pentagon needed to procure more toilet seats for the B-52 bomber - the planes were (and still are!) old and stuff wears out or gets damaged. There was no remaining stock of parts.

    The problem was that the #manufacturer had long ago junked the tooling used to make the parts (they were metal, requiring tool & die etc). Making that tooling is quite expensive - it's difficult, skilled work. Other costs involved in getting a #manufacturing line set up are also expensive. And they couldn't justify buying and storing tons of extra toilet seats.

    So what you get is a high fixed #cost to rebuild a line, divided by a relatively small number of finished articles, giving an apparently absurd price per unit. Say, a million dollars to make 60 replacement toilet seats to original spec.

    And that gives... $16,667 per seat. And a great, totally #misleading #headline.

    #B52 #B52Bomber #ToiletSeat #GovernmentWaste #waste #procurement