home.social

#anxietyresearch — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #anxietyresearch, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. DATE: October 6, 2026 at 09:26PM
    SOURCE: SCIENCE DAILY PSYCHIATIRY FEED

    TITLE: What happens in the brain when cannabis makes you anxious?

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    Cannabinoids may intensify anxiety by removing a natural brake on specific neurons in the brain’s fear center, particularly during stressful situations. In mice, shutting down those neurons sharply reduced cannabinoid-related anxious behavior.

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #CannabisAnxiety #BrainHealth #Cannabinoids #AnxietyResearch #FearCenter #Neuroscience #StressResponse #MiceStudy #NeuralInhibition #MentalHealthScience

  2. DATE: October 6, 2026 at 09:26PM
    SOURCE: SCIENCE DAILY PSYCHOLOGY FEED

    TITLE: What happens in the brain when cannabis makes you anxious?

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    Cannabinoids may intensify anxiety by removing a natural brake on specific neurons in the brain’s fear center, particularly during stressful situations. In mice, shutting down those neurons sharply reduced cannabinoid-related anxious behavior.

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #CannabisAndAnxiety #BrainChemistry #AnxietyResearch #Cannabinoids #FearCenter #Neuroscience #StressResponse #MiceStudy #MentalHealthScience #NeuralMechanisms

  3. DATE: October 6, 2026 at 09:26PM
    SOURCE: SCIENCE DAILY MIND-BRAIN FEED

    TITLE: What happens in the brain when cannabis makes you anxious?

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    Cannabinoids may intensify anxiety by removing a natural brake on specific neurons in the brain’s fear center, particularly during stressful situations. In mice, shutting down those neurons sharply reduced cannabinoid-related anxious behavior.

    URL: sciencedaily.com/releases/2026

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #CannabisAnxiety #BrainChemistry #Cannabinoids #AnxietyResearch #Neuroscience #FearCenter #BrakesOnNeurons # StressAndAnxiety #MiceStudy #MentalHealthScience

  4. DATE: September 25, 2026 at 02:00PM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Scientists identify the nose-to-brain circuit that makes slow breathing calming

    URL: psypost.org/scientists-identif

    Slow nasal breathing patterns directly reduce anxiety by activating a specific pathway from the nose to the brain’s emotion centers, while fast breathing tends to have the opposite effect. The research also suggests that a daily routine of simulated slow breathing can provide lasting relief from anxiety-like symptoms. The findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

    Practices like yoga and meditation often focus on slow, rhythmic breathing to calm the mind. While scientists know that the lower brainstem controls our automatic breathing rhythm, the physical sensation of air moving through the nasal cavity also sends powerful signals to the rest of the brain. When we inhale, the physical pressure of the air activates olfactory sensory neurons. These are specialized nerve cells located in the nasal cavity that detect both chemical odors and the mechanical pressure of airflow.

    Past work indicates that these nasal signals play a role in shaping how we feel. For example, a study covered by PsyPost in 2016 provided evidence that the route and rhythm of breathing directly modulate brain activity, with nasal inhalation leading to faster recognition of fearful faces. However, it was not entirely understood exactly how the speed of these nasal signals affects emotional states, or which exact brain pathways translate the rhythm of breathing into a feeling of calm or panic.

    “The idea that slow breathing calms us down is ancient, but the neuroscience was unclear,” Ruiqi Wu, a professor and principal investigator at the Institutes of Brain Science at Fudan University, told PsyPost. “It didn’t tell whether breathing affects emotion through the brain’s top-down processes, through brainstem respiratory centers, or through the airflow itself.”

    “We wanted to settle this causally,” Wu continued. “Our answer: the airflow itself is the signal. Its frequency alone, independent of breathing effort or conscious control, shifts anxiety up or down.”

    To test this, the research team, led by Xinsong Guo and supervised by Wu, designed a series of experiments to map this connection. They began by measuring the natural breathing rates of mice, establishing two breaths per second as a slow frequency, four breaths per second as a moderate frequency, and seven breaths per second as a fast frequency.

    To manipulate the nasal signals, the researchers used a technique called optogenetics. They genetically modified the olfactory sensory neurons in the mice to be sensitive to light. By shining a blue laser through tiny fiber optic cables implanted in the animals’ nasal cavities, the scientists could control exactly how fast these neurons fired, without changing the animals’ actual breathing rate.

    During the light stimulation, the mice were placed in behavioral arenas to assess their anxiety levels. In the Elevated Plus Maze, a mouse explores a raised cross-shaped platform with two enclosed arms and two open arms. In the Open Field Test, a mouse is placed in a large, empty box. Mice are prey animals that naturally fear open spaces where they might be seen, so they usually hug the walls or hide in the enclosed arms. If a mouse spends more time exploring the open areas, it indicates a lower state of anxiety.

    The behavioral tests showed distinct changes depending on the speed of the stimulation. When the researchers stimulated the nasal neurons at a slow rate of two times per second, the mice spent much more time in the open areas of the testing arenas, indicating a calmer state. Fast stimulation at seven times per second caused the mice to avoid the open areas, suggesting heightened anxiety. Moderate stimulation produced no noticeable changes compared to normal behavior.

    “How you breathe through your nose is not just a reflection of your emotional state; it is an input your brain actively reads,” Wu said. “Slow nasal breathing engages a specific brain circuit that lowers anxiety, while fast nasal breathing pushes the same circuit in the opposite direction. This gives scientific grounding to breathing practices, with a caution: rapid breathing during stress is not just a symptom of anxiety, it may actively feed it.”

    To understand what was happening inside the brain, the team recorded electrical activity in a region called the perirhinal cortex. The perirhinal cortex is an area located deep within the brain that is often associated with memory but receives direct input from the olfactory system. The researchers focused on high-gamma waves, which are fast electrical rhythms associated with active neural processing and communication.

    They found that slow nasal stimulation boosted high-gamma waves in the perirhinal cortex, while fast stimulation reduced them. A higher level of high-gamma activity correlated directly with lower anxiety levels in the mice.

    The scientists then traced the exact physical pathway these signals travel. The electrical impulses move from the olfactory sensory neurons in the nose to mitral cells in the olfactory bulb, which acts as the brain’s smell-processing center. From there, the signals travel to a specific type of cell in the perirhinal cortex called parvalbumin-positive interneurons. These cells act like pacemakers, helping to synchronize brain waves. Finally, the pathway connects to the basolateral amygdala, an almond-shaped cluster of neurons known to play a massive role in processing fear and anxiety.

    The researchers were struck by the precision of this mechanism. “First, how robust the effect is: nasal input frequency alone, delivered with no other cues, reliably shifts anxiety-like behavior in both directions,” Wu noted. “Second, the bidirectionality: the same circuit interprets slow input as calming and fast input as aggravating, working like a frequency dial for emotion. Third, the identity of a key relay: long-range projection interneurons in the perirhinal cortex; these PV+ cells act as a critical node in a limbic circuit.”

    To verify that this exact pathway regulates anxiety, the researchers used chemogenetics. This method involves inserting engineered proteins into specific brain cells. These proteins do nothing until the animal is given a specialized designer drug, allowing researchers to temporarily turn specific brain pathways on or off without affecting the rest of the body.

    When the team used the chemical drug to activate the parvalbumin-positive cells in the perirhinal cortex, the mice became less anxious and their high-gamma brain waves increased. Turning these cells off made the mice more anxious. This provided strong evidence that this specific chain of connections translates the speed of nasal signals into emotional states.

    In a final phase of the research, the team tested whether slow breathing could act as a sustained treatment. They induced a chronic anxiety-like state in a group of mice using mild foot shocks. These anxious mice showed depleted high-gamma brain waves and avoided open spaces entirely.

    The anxious mice then received a daily, two-hour treatment of slow stimulation for two weeks. The team tested both the light-based method and actual mechanical puffs of air delivered into the nasal cavity. Both the light and the air treatments completely restored the mice’s behavior to normal, pre-anxiety levels. The treatments also repaired the deficit in their high-gamma brain waves, and the calming effects lasted for at least a week after the daily treatments stopped.

    The findings are in line with research covered by PsyPost in 2025, which found that an anxiety-inducing environment prompted rats to breathe faster, driving direct changes in brain wave frequencies. It is worth keeping in mind that the earlier study tracked natural, spontaneous breathing patterns in rats, while the current study actively manipulated nasal airflow to alter the emotional state of mice.

    “The behavioral effects in mice were robust and reproducible, and a brief daily regimen of low-frequency nasal airflow produced lasting reductions in anxiety-like behaviors,” Wu said. “But this is a mouse study. The main value is establishing the principle and the mechanism: frequency-tuned nasal input is a legitimate handle on the anxiety system. Translation to humans will require clinical testing.”

    As with all research, there are a few things to keep in mind. The study relied exclusively on male mice. Future research will need to include female mice to see if hormonal fluctuations change how this specific brain circuit operates.

    Also, while the light-based stimulation provided an exact way to test the brain, it does not perfectly copy the complex physical sensation of air naturally flowing through a living animal’s nose. Because humans and mice have different brain structures, more research is needed to see if specific mechanical breathing devices or guided breathing exercises could target this same pathway to treat human anxiety disorders.

    “This is a mouse study, so human benefits remain to be demonstrated,” Wu cautioned. “The effect depends on nasal airflow specifically, so mouth breathing would not engage this circuit; the advice should really be ‘breathe slowly through your nose.’ And this is a promising research direction in clinical anxiety.”

    Looking ahead, the researchers have several next steps planned. “We are working in three directions: testing whether the same principles hold in humans, exploring whether the nose-brain axis is disrupted in disorders involving olfactory abnormalities, and studying how nasal stimulation shapes the brain, toward a practical, protocol-based nasal stimulation modulation,” Wu explained.

    “One broader point: the nose may be an underappreciated gateway into the brain,” Wu concluded. “Because nasal input reaches limbic circuits, bypassing the thalamus, the nasal route offers a noninvasive and accessible window for regulating brain states. We hope this work encourages more attention to this direction.”

    The study, “A nose-to-brain circuit underlies anxiety regulation by nasal afferent frequency in mice,” was authored by Xinsong Guo, Mengyan Liu, Qingcheng Xiong, Howai Ngai, Mingdong He, Xinying Li, Yingwei Zheng, Fuqiang Xu, Minghong Ma, and Ruiqi Wu.

    URL: psypost.org/scientists-identif

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #NoseToBrain #BreathingAndAnxiety #SlowBreathingCalm #NasalSignalPathway #OlfactoryNeurons #PerirhinalCortex #PVInterneurons #HighGammaWaves #AnxietyResearch #PNAS study

  5. DATE: September 23, 2026 at 09:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Social anxiety drives people to conform specifically to negative feedback

    URL: psypost.org/social-anxiety-dri

    People with high social anxiety are highly prone to adjusting their own emotions to match negative feedback from their peers, a tendency backed by sustained brain activity. A small study published in Biological Psychology reveals that this biased conformity may help maintain anxiety symptoms by causing individuals to overthink critical social information.

    Social anxiety involves an intense fear of being evaluated poorly by others, combined with a strong motivation to be accepted. This psychological tension often leads people to conform to group norms as a defensive strategy against social rejection. Past research on social influence has mostly focused on how people change their outward opinions, such as rating the attractiveness of a face or answering a factual question.

    Lixia Cui, Xiaofei Dong, and a team of researchers from Capital Normal University and Zhejiang Normal University wanted to understand a deeper phenomenon known as emotional conformity. Emotional conformity happens when individuals actually adjust their internal anticipated feelings to match the emotions of the people around them. For someone with social anxiety, shifting their internal emotional state to match a group could slowly erode their authentic self-expression and reinforce negative thoughts.

    The researchers designed a study to map the exact brain mechanisms that drive this process. They focused on two distinct stages of information processing in the human brain, which can be measured using sensors placed on the scalp.

    The first stage is an early, automatic reaction to social conflict, often called a conflict detection signal. When a person realizes they disagree with a group, the brain typically produces a specific electrical dip about 400 milliseconds later.

    The second stage involves deliberate, prolonged mental effort. If the brain decides that a piece of information is highly relevant to a person’s goals or fears, it sustains an electrical charge over a longer period. This late signal acts as a marker of deep engagement, showing that a person is spending mental energy trying to integrate conflicting information.

    To test how these brain signals operate during emotional conformity, the research team recruited 44 young adults. Half of the participants scored high on a questionnaire measuring social anxiety traits, while the other half scored very low.

    During the experiment, participants sat in front of a computer monitor wearing a cap fitted with electrodes. They viewed a series of 300 images depicting different social scenes. Half of the images showed neutral situations, and the other half showed socially threatening or negative situations.

    For each image, participants were instructed to imagine themselves as the person in the scene. They then rated how pleasant or unpleasant they would feel in that situation on a nine-point scale.

    Immediately after locking in their answer, the participants saw a feedback screen. This screen displayed what was supposedly the average rating given by 200 college students who had previously viewed the same image. In reality, the researchers pre-programmed this feedback. For one third of the trials, the peer rating matched the participant’s rating. For another third, the peers appeared slightly more positive. For the final third, the peers appeared slightly more negative.

    The participants then took a 30-minute break. After the break, they were asked to rate all the same images a second time, but this time without seeing any peer feedback. By comparing the first and second ratings, the researchers could measure exactly how much each person changed their anticipated feelings based on the social pressure.

    The behavioral results showed a sharp contrast between the two groups from the very beginning. During the initial rating phase, participants with high social anxiety rated the neutral social scenes much more negatively than participants with low anxiety. This suggests that people with elevated social anxiety carry a generalized negativity bias, causing them to anticipate unpleasant feelings even in harmless situations.

    When the researchers looked at how the ratings changed after the break, they found a lopsided pattern of conformity. Individuals with high social anxiety were highly sensitive to peer feedback that was more negative than their own initial rating. When told that peers found a scene more unpleasant than they did, the anxious participants drastically lowered their second ratings.

    They did not show the same level of conformity when the peer feedback was more positive than their own. If the peers rated a situation as relatively pleasant, the anxious participants mostly ignored it. This means they selectively absorbed social information that confirmed their fears while disregarding information that contradicted those fears.

    The brain wave recordings provided a biological explanation for this behavior. When the participants with high anxiety saw that peers gave a more negative rating to a negative scene, their brains produced a large spike in the late electrical signal associated with mental effort.

    This amplified late signal showed that the anxious participants were dedicating intense, sustained cognitive resources to process the negative feedback. They were not just automatically mimicking the group. Instead, they were actively overthinking the social disagreement and working hard to integrate the critical information into their own emotional expectations.

    The researchers also examined the early electrical signals that track automatic conflict detection. This early brain wave did not reveal any robust or interpretable differences between conditions; although an overall three-way interaction was detected, no specific comparisons reached significance. This suggests that the biased conformity seen in social anxiety is not an immediate, uncontrollable reflex, but is driven by the later stages of deep, motivated thinking.

    A few limitations to the study should be kept in mind. The research utilized static images and pre-programmed numbers on a computer screen to simulate peer pressure. Real-world social influence usually involves dynamic cues, such as shifting facial expressions, tone of voice, and interactive dialogue.

    The participant pool was largely female. Because men and women can sometimes experience social pressure differently, the unequal gender ratio limits how broadly the findings can be applied. The group with high social anxiety was also identified through a self-report survey rather than a clinical evaluation. Studies involving patients formally diagnosed with social anxiety disorder will be needed to confirm these exact brain patterns in clinical settings.

    Despite these limitations, the research offers a detailed look at how anxiety hijacks social learning. Because people with social anxiety spend extra mental energy processing negative opinions, they constantly validate their own insecurities. Future psychological therapies might help by training individuals to recognize this mental trap, teaching them how to disengage from critical feedback and break the cycle of emotional conformity.

    The study, “Aberrant emotional conformity among individuals with social anxiety,” was authored by Lixia Cui, Chuanji Gao, Xiaoqing Yan, and Xiaofei Dong.

    URL: psypost.org/social-anxiety-dri

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #SocialAnxiety #EmotionalConformity #NegativeFeedback #BrainWaves #LateSignal #MentalEffort #PeerPressure #AnxietyResearch #CognitiveProcessing #SocialInfluence

  6. There is a category of person who appears calm and prepared in every crisis. What looks like composure is actually a nervous system that started rehearsing failure months ago. The preparation was never about the event. It was about surviving the waiting.

    #BehavioralScience #AnxietyResearch

    🔗 udemy.com/course/positive-psyc

  7. That music can serve more than purely aesthetic or entertainment purposes is no longer a surprising idea. Across many cultures and historical periods, music has functioned as a means of regulating mood, attention, and bodily states. Over the past decades, clinical research has begun to examine these effects with greater methodological care. Within psychiatry and psychology, music-based interventions now appear in studies addressing anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and related conditions.

    Structured musical interventions - such as guided listening, improvisation-based music therapy, or therapist-led sessions - can reduce obsessive symptoms, lower anxiety, and ease depressive comorbidity when used alongside established forms of treatment. Controlled studies report measurable improvements in anxiety and obsessive symptoms when music therapy accompanies standard care. At the same time, sample sizes remain limited, and further research is required.

    Music also relates to cognitive and emotional mechanisms that are relevant to OCD. Studies indicate that individuals with obsessive-compulsive personality traits often show heightened sensitivity to musical tension and a strong preference for harmonic resolution. These observations suggest links between musical structure, predictive processing in the brain, and the regulation of intrusive thoughts.

    The intersection of neuroscience, psychology, and musical practice therefore forms a productive field of investigation. Musical processes operate simultaneously on several levels: rhythm can synchronize breathing and autonomic activity, tonal expectation structures attention, and deep musical immersion alters the subjective experience of time as well as aspects of cognitive control. These characteristics make music a complex medium within therapeutic contexts.

    I examined these questions in greater detail last year, focusing on anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive conditions, the current evidence base, and practical forms of music-based interventions in clinical settings.

    Read the full essay:
    tomkolbe.com/2025/08/25/music-

    #MusicTherapy #MusicAndMentalHealth #Neuroscience #Psychology #OCD #AnxietyResearch #MusicAndTheBrain #MusicResearch #MusicAndHealth

  8. Study suggests that depression and anxiety can spread between married couples through shared mouth bacteria or kissing 💑🦠. Bacteria linked to depression, anxiety, and sleep problems became more abundant in both partners. Scientists believe they affect the brain by compromising the blood-brain barrier. 🧠💔

    Read Full Article

    #MentalHealth #CouplesWellness #BacteriaAndBrain #DepressionAwareness #AnxietyResearch https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/if-your-partner-has-depression-anxiety-you-could-catch-it-by-kissing-them-says-new-study-101748059706402-amp.html
    Reenviado desde Science News
    (https://t.me/experienciainterdimensional/9286)

  9. Think your anxiety self-assessment is accurate? Science says there's only a 50/50 chance. New research reveals the shocking truth gap between how we perceive our own anxiety and what professionals diagnose.

    #MentalHealth #AnxietyResearch

    hecknews.com/insights/anxiety-

  10. 🚨 The latest "scientific breakthrough" involves a protein that multitasks as both an infection fighter and your brain's anxiety switch. 🤯 Meanwhile, the article itself does a fantastic job of offering zero information, assuming you can even get past its security blockade. 🙄🔒
    medicalxpress.com/news/2025-04 #scientificbreakthrough #multitaskingprotein #anxietyresearch #securityissues #informationoverload #HackerNews #ngated

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.