home.social

#a2000 — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #a2000, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @retronom Na klar. Ich hatte einen #A2000 mit 2 LW, einer internen 40 MB SCSI-HD, Speichererweiterung auf 9 MB und einen Co-Prozessor.
    Ich hatte durch div. Zusatzprogramme fast einen #unix-ähnlichen Rechner. So war mein Übergang später zu #Linux fast zwangsläufig. #Amiga war so krass unterschätzt. Er wurde leider immer nur als #Spielerechner gesehn.

  2. @retronom Na klar. Ich hatte einen #A2000 mit 2 LW, einer internen 40 MB SCSI-HD, Speichererweiterung auf 9 MB und einen Co-Prozessor.
    Ich hatte durch div. Zusatzprogramme fast einen #unix-ähnlichen Rechner. So war mein Übergang später zu #Linux fast zwangsläufig. #Amiga war so krass unterschätzt. Er wurde leider immer nur als #Spielerechner gesehn.

  3. @retronom Na klar. Ich hatte einen #A2000 mit 2 LW, einer internen 40 MB SCSI-HD, Speichererweiterung auf 9 MB und einen Co-Prozessor.
    Ich hatte durch div. Zusatzprogramme fast einen #unix-ähnlichen Rechner. So war mein Übergang später zu #Linux fast zwangsläufig. #Amiga war so krass unterschätzt. Er wurde leider immer nur als #Spielerechner gesehn.

  4. @retronom Na klar. Ich hatte einen #A2000 mit 2 LW, einer internen 40 MB SCSI-HD, Speichererweiterung auf 9 MB und einen Co-Prozessor.
    Ich hatte durch div. Zusatzprogramme fast einen #unix-ähnlichen Rechner. So war mein Übergang später zu #Linux fast zwangsläufig. #Amiga war so krass unterschätzt. Er wurde leider immer nur als #Spielerechner gesehn.

  5. @sabine_depew Meinen #A2000 hatte ich von 1991 bis 2001. Mit RAM-Erweiterung auf 9MB, Co-ProzessorCard und interner 40 Megabyte-SCSI-HD. Leider gab es das coole #Amiga 1000-Gehäuse nie mit der Leistung eines #A4000. Vielleicht baue ich mir sowas mal 🙂

  6. @sabine_depew Meinen #A2000 hatte ich von 1991 bis 2001. Mit RAM-Erweiterung auf 9MB, Co-ProzessorCard und interner 40 Megabyte-SCSI-HD. Leider gab es das coole #Amiga 1000-Gehäuse nie mit der Leistung eines #A4000. Vielleicht baue ich mir sowas mal 🙂

  7. @sabine_depew Meinen #A2000 hatte ich von 1991 bis 2001. Mit RAM-Erweiterung auf 9MB, Co-ProzessorCard und interner 40 Megabyte-SCSI-HD. Leider gab es das coole #Amiga 1000-Gehäuse nie mit der Leistung eines #A4000. Vielleicht baue ich mir sowas mal 🙂

  8. I ordered a new, ceramic and gold MC68010 to go in my Amiga 2000 as I remove the A2620 '020 board due to issues with some tightly-coded old and new OCS/ECS demos (my main use of the system). I came to realize some of these issues would exhibit with the '010 as well, and for very little performance gain.

    And so, the loveld 68010 may become one of my "desk chips" to glance at from time to time as I do my thing at the desk, like my lovely ceramic and gold Freescale '000.

    #MC68010 #Motorola #CPU #chips #Amiga #A2000 #Freescale #ceramic #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #computinghistory #MC68020 #ByteCellar

  9. I ordered a new, ceramic and gold MC68010 to go in my Amiga 2000 as I remove the A2620 '020 board due to issues with some tightly-coded old and new OCS/ECS demos (my main use of the system). I came to realize some of these issues would exhibit with the '010 as well, and for very little performance gain.

    And so, the loveld 68010 may become one of my "desk chips" to glance at from time to time as I do my thing at the desk, like my lovely ceramic and gold Freescale '000.

    #MC68010 #Motorola #CPU #chips #Amiga #A2000 #Freescale #ceramic #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #computinghistory #MC68020 #ByteCellar

  10. I ordered a new, ceramic and gold MC68010 to go in my Amiga 2000 as I remove the A2620 '020 board due to issues with some tightly-coded old and new OCS/ECS demos (my main use of the system). I came to realize some of these issues would exhibit with the '010 as well, and for very little performance gain.

    And so, the loveld 68010 may become one of my "desk chips" to glance at from time to time as I do my thing at the desk, like my lovely ceramic and gold Freescale '000.

    #MC68010 #Motorola #CPU #chips #Amiga #A2000 #Freescale #ceramic #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #computinghistory #MC68020 #ByteCellar

  11. I ordered a new, ceramic and gold MC68010 to go in my Amiga 2000 as I remove the A2620 '020 board due to issues with some tightly-coded old and new OCS/ECS demos (my main use of the system). I came to realize some of these issues would exhibit with the '010 as well, and for very little performance gain.

    And so, the loveld 68010 may become one of my "desk chips" to glance at from time to time as I do my thing at the desk, like my lovely ceramic and gold Freescale '000.

    #MC68010 #Motorola #CPU #chips #Amiga #A2000 #Freescale #ceramic #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #computinghistory #MC68020 #ByteCellar

  12. I ordered a new, ceramic and gold MC68010 to go in my Amiga 2000 as I remove the A2620 '020 board due to issues with some tightly-coded old and new OCS/ECS demos (my main use of the system). I came to realize some of these issues would exhibit with the '010 as well, and for very little performance gain.

    And so, the loveld 68010 may become one of my "desk chips" to glance at from time to time as I do my thing at the desk, like my lovely ceramic and gold Freescale '000.

    #MC68010 #Motorola #CPU #chips #Amiga #A2000 #Freescale #ceramic #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #computinghistory #MC68020 #ByteCellar

  13. I am considering the configuration of my Amiga 2000 w/ 68020 accelerator... I would appreciate opinions from drivers of slotted Amigas, here.

    I have an Amiga 2000 with SCSI + SCSI2SD, 4MB 16-bit FAST RAM, 1MB CHIP RAM, etc. It also has an A2620 68020 accelerator (14MHz) with 2MB 32-bit FAST RAM which is meager, but makes things noticeably faster on the Workbench. Most of what I do on this is watch demos and play games, though. All I do on desktop, really, is use AmiTCP and ncftp to bring files over and run IMP sometimes.

    I recently downloaded the Amiga demo 'Downslope' and noticed it's less fluid / smooth with the accelerator enabled. I've seen this before here and there, but assumed that the accelerator was doing my a solid in demos - giving a bit of a boost.

    I commented about this in the Pouet 'Downslope' thread and the developer came in and commented,

    ---
    "Accelerators often introduce an asynchronicity between CPU and chip memory, which adds to chip access latency.
    This can be worsened by the occurrance of many interrupts, which can cause additional strain on memory on a higher CPU.
    If we are unlucky, not even the much faster execution time of the higher CPU can make up for the additional latencies and strain on chip memory.
    It's a matter of focus on the target. There are side effects on higher CPUs which are difficult to anticipate, and usually you have only a limited number of machines for testing."
    ---

    This makes sense, I suppose. Is this common? Are people with '030, '040, '060 accelerators having a lesser experience with demos due to CHIP RAM latency than with base '000? Certainly in some scenarios the more powerful CPU helps hugely for demos and games alike - I've seen this on my '020. But, yes -- demos are the most tightly coded of all Amiga apps, certainly. To the metal, etc.

    So I am wondering now, should I remove the accelerator to get the most out of OCS/ECS demos on the system? Yes, I can disable the accelerator with a right mouse click at reboot, but that gets in the way of keeping Degrader's PAL state in effect, causing a hassle. (it's an NTSC A2000, unfortunately).

    Anyone been down this road? Thoughts?

    #Amiga #Commodore #CommodoreAmiga #A2000 #A2500 #MC68000 #MC68020 #MC68030 #demo #demos #demoscene #scenedemo #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #vintagecomputers #retrocomputers #retrogaming #hardware #vintaghardware #A2620 #A2630 #DaveHaynie #ZorroII #terriblefire #oldcomputers

  14. I am considering the configuration of my Amiga 2000 w/ 68020 accelerator... I would appreciate opinions from drivers of slotted Amigas, here.

    I have an Amiga 2000 with SCSI + SCSI2SD, 4MB 16-bit FAST RAM, 1MB CHIP RAM, etc. It also has an A2620 68020 accelerator (14MHz) with 2MB 32-bit FAST RAM which is meager, but makes things noticeably faster on the Workbench. Most of what I do on this is watch demos and play games, though. All I do on desktop, really, is use AmiTCP and ncftp to bring files over and run IMP sometimes.

    I recently downloaded the Amiga demo 'Downslope' and noticed it's less fluid / smooth with the accelerator enabled. I've seen this before here and there, but assumed that the accelerator was doing my a solid in demos - giving a bit of a boost.

    I commented about this in the Pouet 'Downslope' thread and the developer came in and commented,

    ---
    "Accelerators often introduce an asynchronicity between CPU and chip memory, which adds to chip access latency.
    This can be worsened by the occurrance of many interrupts, which can cause additional strain on memory on a higher CPU.
    If we are unlucky, not even the much faster execution time of the higher CPU can make up for the additional latencies and strain on chip memory.
    It's a matter of focus on the target. There are side effects on higher CPUs which are difficult to anticipate, and usually you have only a limited number of machines for testing."
    ---

    This makes sense, I suppose. Is this common? Are people with '030, '040, '060 accelerators having a lesser experience with demos due to CHIP RAM latency than with base '000? Certainly in some scenarios the more powerful CPU helps hugely for demos and games alike - I've seen this on my '020. But, yes -- demos are the most tightly coded of all Amiga apps, certainly. To the metal, etc.

    So I am wondering now, should I remove the accelerator to get the most out of OCS/ECS demos on the system? Yes, I can disable the accelerator with a right mouse click at reboot, but that gets in the way of keeping Degrader's PAL state in effect, causing a hassle. (it's an NTSC A2000, unfortunately).

    Anyone been down this road? Thoughts?

    #Amiga #Commodore #CommodoreAmiga #A2000 #A2500 #MC68000 #MC68020 #MC68030 #demo #demos #demoscene #scenedemo #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #vintagecomputers #retrocomputers #retrogaming #hardware #vintaghardware #A2620 #A2630 #DaveHaynie #ZorroII #terriblefire #oldcomputers

  15. I am considering the configuration of my Amiga 2000 w/ 68020 accelerator... I would appreciate opinions from drivers of slotted Amigas, here.

    I have an Amiga 2000 with SCSI + SCSI2SD, 4MB 16-bit FAST RAM, 1MB CHIP RAM, etc. It also has an A2620 68020 accelerator (14MHz) with 2MB 32-bit FAST RAM which is meager, but makes things noticeably faster on the Workbench. Most of what I do on this is watch demos and play games, though. All I do on desktop, really, is use AmiTCP and ncftp to bring files over and run IMP sometimes.

    I recently downloaded the Amiga demo 'Downslope' and noticed it's less fluid / smooth with the accelerator enabled. I've seen this before here and there, but assumed that the accelerator was doing my a solid in demos - giving a bit of a boost.

    I commented about this in the Pouet 'Downslope' thread and the developer came in and commented,

    ---
    "Accelerators often introduce an asynchronicity between CPU and chip memory, which adds to chip access latency.
    This can be worsened by the occurrance of many interrupts, which can cause additional strain on memory on a higher CPU.
    If we are unlucky, not even the much faster execution time of the higher CPU can make up for the additional latencies and strain on chip memory.
    It's a matter of focus on the target. There are side effects on higher CPUs which are difficult to anticipate, and usually you have only a limited number of machines for testing."
    ---

    This makes sense, I suppose. Is this common? Are people with '030, '040, '060 accelerators having a lesser experience with demos due to CHIP RAM latency than with base '000? Certainly in some scenarios the more powerful CPU helps hugely for demos and games alike - I've seen this on my '020. But, yes -- demos are the most tightly coded of all Amiga apps, certainly. To the metal, etc.

    So I am wondering now, should I remove the accelerator to get the most out of OCS/ECS demos on the system? Yes, I can disable the accelerator with a right mouse click at reboot, but that gets in the way of keeping Degrader's PAL state in effect, causing a hassle. (it's an NTSC A2000, unfortunately).

    Anyone been down this road? Thoughts?

    #Amiga #Commodore #CommodoreAmiga #A2000 #A2500 #MC68000 #MC68020 #MC68030 #demo #demos #demoscene #scenedemo #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #vintagecomputers #retrocomputers #retrogaming #hardware #vintaghardware #A2620 #A2630 #DaveHaynie #ZorroII #terriblefire #oldcomputers

  16. I am considering the configuration of my Amiga 2000 w/ 68020 accelerator... I would appreciate opinions from drivers of slotted Amigas, here.

    I have an Amiga 2000 with SCSI + SCSI2SD, 4MB 16-bit FAST RAM, 1MB CHIP RAM, etc. It also has an A2620 68020 accelerator (14MHz) with 2MB 32-bit FAST RAM which is meager, but makes things noticeably faster on the Workbench. Most of what I do on this is watch demos and play games, though. All I do on desktop, really, is use AmiTCP and ncftp to bring files over and run IMP sometimes.

    I recently downloaded the Amiga demo 'Downslope' and noticed it's less fluid / smooth with the accelerator enabled. I've seen this before here and there, but assumed that the accelerator was doing my a solid in demos - giving a bit of a boost.

    I commented about this in the Pouet 'Downslope' thread and the developer came in and commented,

    ---
    "Accelerators often introduce an asynchronicity between CPU and chip memory, which adds to chip access latency.
    This can be worsened by the occurrance of many interrupts, which can cause additional strain on memory on a higher CPU.
    If we are unlucky, not even the much faster execution time of the higher CPU can make up for the additional latencies and strain on chip memory.
    It's a matter of focus on the target. There are side effects on higher CPUs which are difficult to anticipate, and usually you have only a limited number of machines for testing."
    ---

    This makes sense, I suppose. Is this common? Are people with '030, '040, '060 accelerators having a lesser experience with demos due to CHIP RAM latency than with base '000? Certainly in some scenarios the more powerful CPU helps hugely for demos and games alike - I've seen this on my '020. But, yes -- demos are the most tightly coded of all Amiga apps, certainly. To the metal, etc.

    So I am wondering now, should I remove the accelerator to get the most out of OCS/ECS demos on the system? Yes, I can disable the accelerator with a right mouse click at reboot, but that gets in the way of keeping Degrader's PAL state in effect, causing a hassle. (it's an NTSC A2000, unfortunately).

    Anyone been down this road? Thoughts?

    #Amiga #Commodore #CommodoreAmiga #A2000 #A2500 #MC68000 #MC68020 #MC68030 #demo #demos #demoscene #scenedemo #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #vintagecomputers #retrocomputers #retrogaming #hardware #vintaghardware #A2620 #A2630 #DaveHaynie #ZorroII #terriblefire #oldcomputers

  17. I am considering the configuration of my Amiga 2000 w/ 68020 accelerator... I would appreciate opinions from drivers of slotted Amigas, here.

    I have an Amiga 2000 with SCSI + SCSI2SD, 4MB 16-bit FAST RAM, 1MB CHIP RAM, etc. It also has an A2620 68020 accelerator (14MHz) with 2MB 32-bit FAST RAM which is meager, but makes things noticeably faster on the Workbench. Most of what I do on this is watch demos and play games, though. All I do on desktop, really, is use AmiTCP and ncftp to bring files over and run IMP sometimes.

    I recently downloaded the Amiga demo 'Downslope' and noticed it's less fluid / smooth with the accelerator enabled. I've seen this before here and there, but assumed that the accelerator was doing my a solid in demos - giving a bit of a boost.

    I commented about this in the Pouet 'Downslope' thread and the developer came in and commented,

    ---
    "Accelerators often introduce an asynchronicity between CPU and chip memory, which adds to chip access latency.
    This can be worsened by the occurrance of many interrupts, which can cause additional strain on memory on a higher CPU.
    If we are unlucky, not even the much faster execution time of the higher CPU can make up for the additional latencies and strain on chip memory.
    It's a matter of focus on the target. There are side effects on higher CPUs which are difficult to anticipate, and usually you have only a limited number of machines for testing."
    ---

    This makes sense, I suppose. Is this common? Are people with '030, '040, '060 accelerators having a lesser experience with demos due to CHIP RAM latency than with base '000? Certainly in some scenarios the more powerful CPU helps hugely for demos and games alike - I've seen this on my '020. But, yes -- demos are the most tightly coded of all Amiga apps, certainly. To the metal, etc.

    So I am wondering now, should I remove the accelerator to get the most out of OCS/ECS demos on the system? Yes, I can disable the accelerator with a right mouse click at reboot, but that gets in the way of keeping Degrader's PAL state in effect, causing a hassle. (it's an NTSC A2000, unfortunately).

    Anyone been down this road? Thoughts?

    #Amiga #Commodore #CommodoreAmiga #A2000 #A2500 #MC68000 #MC68020 #MC68030 #demo #demos #demoscene #scenedemo #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #vintagecomputers #retrocomputers #retrogaming #hardware #vintaghardware #A2620 #A2630 #DaveHaynie #ZorroII #terriblefire #oldcomputers

  18. Photo of my Amiga 2000 (taken in 1989) running the scenedemo Raster Magic by Megaforce.

    The Amiga is equipped with a BridgeBoard, hence the internal and external 5.25" floppy drives, with a SupraModem 2400 atop the latter. The CRT is a Commodore 1084S. Pack-in poster from the game Starglider on the wall to the left.

    pouet.net/prod.php?which=13481

    #Amiga #demoscene #scenedemo #megaforce #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #retrogaming #A2000 #Amiga2000 #Commodore #CRT #nostalgia #photo

  19. Photo of my Amiga 2000 (taken in 1989) running the scenedemo Raster Magic by Megaforce.

    The Amiga is equipped with a BridgeBoard, hence the internal and external 5.25" floppy drives, with a SupraModem 2400 atop the latter. The CRT is a Commodore 1084S. Pack-in poster from the game Starglider on the wall to the left.

    pouet.net/prod.php?which=13481

    #Amiga #demoscene #scenedemo #megaforce #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #retrogaming #A2000 #Amiga2000 #Commodore #CRT #nostalgia #photo

  20. Photo of my Amiga 2000 (taken in 1989) running the scenedemo Raster Magic by Megaforce.

    The Amiga is equipped with a BridgeBoard, hence the internal and external 5.25" floppy drives, with a SupraModem 2400 atop the latter. The CRT is a Commodore 1084S. Pack-in poster from the game Starglider on the wall to the left.

    pouet.net/prod.php?which=13481

    #Amiga #demoscene #scenedemo #megaforce #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #retrogaming #A2000 #Amiga2000 #Commodore #CRT #nostalgia #photo

  21. Photo of my Amiga 2000 (taken in 1989) running the scenedemo Raster Magic by Megaforce.

    The Amiga is equipped with a BridgeBoard, hence the internal and external 5.25" floppy drives, with a SupraModem 2400 atop the latter. The CRT is a Commodore 1084S. Pack-in poster from the game Starglider on the wall to the left.

    pouet.net/prod.php?which=13481

    #Amiga #demoscene #scenedemo #megaforce #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #retrogaming #A2000 #Amiga2000 #Commodore #CRT #nostalgia #photo

  22. Photo of my Amiga 2000 (taken in 1989) running the scenedemo Raster Magic by Megaforce.

    The Amiga is equipped with a BridgeBoard, hence the internal and external 5.25" floppy drives, with a SupraModem 2400 atop the latter. The CRT is a Commodore 1084S. Pack-in poster from the game Starglider on the wall to the left.

    pouet.net/prod.php?which=13481

    #Amiga #demoscene #scenedemo #megaforce #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #retrogaming #A2000 #Amiga2000 #Commodore #CRT #nostalgia #photo

  23. Oh neat, the #A500 I found at the fair is a rev6 with an 8372 agnus chip. Easy 1mb of chipmem then.
    One day I should really try to get hold of a 8375 and try an adapter to get to 2mb. Would probably fit it into an #A2000 though, not an A500.
    I *think* I remember reading that the kickstart can now be modified to initialize an NTSC agnus for operation on a PAL #Amiga. Maybe those are easier to source. Or were, once, a long time ago.

  24. Oh neat, the #A500 I found at the fair is a rev6 with an 8372 agnus chip. Easy 1mb of chipmem then.
    One day I should really try to get hold of a 8375 and try an adapter to get to 2mb. Would probably fit it into an #A2000 though, not an A500.
    I *think* I remember reading that the kickstart can now be modified to initialize an NTSC agnus for operation on a PAL #Amiga. Maybe those are easier to source. Or were, once, a long time ago.

  25. Oh neat, the #A500 I found at the fair is a rev6 with an 8372 agnus chip. Easy 1mb of chipmem then.
    One day I should really try to get hold of a 8375 and try an adapter to get to 2mb. Would probably fit it into an #A2000 though, not an A500.
    I *think* I remember reading that the kickstart can now be modified to initialize an NTSC agnus for operation on a PAL #Amiga. Maybe those are easier to source. Or were, once, a long time ago.

  26. Oh neat, the #A500 I found at the fair is a rev6 with an 8372 agnus chip. Easy 1mb of chipmem then.
    One day I should really try to get hold of a 8375 and try an adapter to get to 2mb. Would probably fit it into an #A2000 though, not an A500.
    I *think* I remember reading that the kickstart can now be modified to initialize an NTSC agnus for operation on a PAL #Amiga. Maybe those are easier to source. Or were, once, a long time ago.

  27. Oh neat, the #A500 I found at the fair is a rev6 with an 8372 agnus chip. Easy 1mb of chipmem then.
    One day I should really try to get hold of a 8375 and try an adapter to get to 2mb. Would probably fit it into an #A2000 though, not an A500.
    I *think* I remember reading that the kickstart can now be modified to initialize an NTSC agnus for operation on a PAL #Amiga. Maybe those are easier to source. Or were, once, a long time ago.

  28. Just watched this video by @amigalove and man, did it bring back memories! Back in 1989/90 I had a #C128D with a 1750 REU and was an avid #GEOS128 user. For about 6 issues, I was even creating a newsletter for a club I was a member of back then with GeoPublish 128, a 24 pin dot matrix printer and a Xerox machine. Good times! In 1991, I could finally afford an #A2000 :ablobcatheart:

    invidious.einfachzocken.eu/wat

  29. I recently bought an #HP z2 mini g9 #SmallFormFactor pc for cad / design work. It has a #i7 #12700k, 64gb and an #Nvidia rtx #a2000 gpu. In a disappointingly thermal and power-compromised (280w total) enclosure. But also only 3.5L!

    Is it worth considering to swap in an i7 #13700k down the road? It would (presumably?) be limited to PL1=90w and PL2=190w, the stock settings for the 12700k in this machine.

    13700k Geekbench: browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/1

    12700k Geekbench: browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/1

  30. I recently bought an #HP z2 mini g9 #SmallFormFactor pc for cad / design work. It has a #i7 #12700k, 64gb and an #Nvidia rtx #a2000 gpu. In a disappointingly thermal and power-compromised (280w total) enclosure. But also only 3.5L!

    Is it worth considering to swap in an i7 #13700k down the road? It would (presumably?) be limited to PL1=90w and PL2=190w, the stock settings for the 12700k in this machine.

    13700k Geekbench: browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/1

    12700k Geekbench: browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/1

  31. I've gifted two Christmas parts to myself. One is the #GreaseweazleV4 #Amiga USB floppy adapter. The other one is the actual RP2040 version of the #ZuluSCSI. First usage is the #MacIIfx. If it works fine maybe another one for the #A2000 after.
    Background: My wife would never ever gift electronic to me, it's not her world.
    #RetroComputing

  32. I've gifted two Christmas parts to myself. One is the #GreaseweazleV4 #Amiga USB floppy adapter. The other one is the actual RP2040 version of the #ZuluSCSI. First usage is the #MacIIfx. If it works fine maybe another one for the #A2000 after.
    Background: My wife would never ever gift electronic to me, it's not her world.
    #RetroComputing

  33. I've gifted two Christmas parts to myself. One is the #GreaseweazleV4 #Amiga USB floppy adapter. The other one is the actual RP2040 version of the #ZuluSCSI. First usage is the #MacIIfx. If it works fine maybe another one for the #A2000 after.
    Background: My wife would never ever gift electronic to me, it's not her world.
    #RetroComputing

  34. I've gifted two Christmas parts to myself. One is the #GreaseweazleV4 #Amiga USB floppy adapter. The other one is the actual RP2040 version of the #ZuluSCSI. First usage is the #MacIIfx. If it works fine maybe another one for the #A2000 after.
    Background: My wife would never ever gift electronic to me, it's not her world.
    #RetroComputing

  35. I've gifted two Christmas parts to myself. One is the #GreaseweazleV4 #Amiga USB floppy adapter. The other one is the actual RP2040 version of the #ZuluSCSI. First usage is the #MacIIfx. If it works fine maybe another one for the #A2000 after.
    Background: My wife would never ever gift electronic to me, it's not her world.
    #RetroComputing