Search
532 results for “corywright”
-
-
Copyright / Nejishiki feat.Ci flower & v flower
posted by Ｐねじ式
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isDE95zkHLc
#Vocaloid #Music #ボカロ -
You say it’s capitalism… But I say it’s #copyright.
Copyright is the kingpin all of this rentier capitalism hangs on.
Illegal #repair, monopolies, #technofeudalism, all of it.
The new tech ’nobility’ that controls the new digital land, controls it through copyright.
With #AI and artists, don’t side with copyright, side with the people’s right to use the #devices they own, how they want to.
They already showed they don’t care for your copyright. Don’t go begging.. !
-
You say it’s capitalism… But I say it’s #copyright.
Copyright is the kingpin all of this rentier capitalism hangs on.
Illegal #repair, monopolies, #technofeudalism, all of it.
The new tech ’nobility’ that controls the new digital land, controls it through copyright.
With #AI and artists, don’t side with copyright, side with the people’s right to use the #devices they own, how they want to.
They already showed they don’t care for your copyright. Don’t go begging.. !
-
You say it’s capitalism… But I say it’s #copyright.
Copyright is the kingpin all of this rentier capitalism hangs on.
Illegal #repair, monopolies, #technofeudalism, all of it.
The new tech ’nobility’ that controls the new digital land, controls it through copyright.
With #AI and artists, don’t side with copyright, side with the people’s right to use the #devices they own, how they want to.
They already showed they don’t care for your copyright. Don’t go begging.. !
-
You say it’s capitalism… But I say it’s #copyright.
Copyright is the kingpin all of this rentier capitalism hangs on.
Illegal #repair, monopolies, #technofeudalism, all of it.
The new tech ’nobility’ that controls the new digital land, controls it through copyright.
With #AI and artists, don’t side with copyright, side with the people’s right to use the #devices they own, how they want to.
They already showed they don’t care for your copyright. Don’t go begging.. !
-
#WTF: Die KI-Hersteller werden beim Datensammeln immer skrupelloser | Developer https://www.heise.de/meinung/WTF-Die-KI-Hersteller-werden-beim-Datensammeln-immer-skrupelloser-11441042.html #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Datenschutz #privacy #Urheberrecht #copyright
-
Assigning your copyright to the FSF helps defend the GPL and keep software free. Thank you Varun Malladi for assigning your copyright to the FSF! More at: https://u.fsf.org/4ce #Emacs #CopyrightAssignments
-
Adding to the bonfire.
Geekwire, from yesterday: Seattle Times sues Microsoft and OpenAI, alleging they trained their AI on its journalism https://www.geekwire.com/2026/seattle-times-sues-microsoft-and-openai-alleging-they-trained-their-ai-on-its-journalism/ #copyright #Microsoft #OpenAI
-
Copyright has limitations and it's about time these limitations are respected. This is the wrong fight to start with AI companies. Copyright is just another form of rent extraction.
"In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models. After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'" Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose. The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it." The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works.
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees. She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is." These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds."
-
Copyright has limitations and it's about time these limitations are respected. This is the wrong fight to start with AI companies. Copyright is just another form of rent extraction.
"In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models. After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'" Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose. The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it." The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works.
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees. She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is." These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds."
-
Copyright has limitations and it's about time these limitations are respected. This is the wrong fight to start with AI companies. Copyright is just another form of rent extraction.
"In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models. After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'" Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose. The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it." The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works.
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees. She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is." These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds."
-
Copyright has limitations and it's about time these limitations are respected. This is the wrong fight to start with AI companies. Copyright is just another form of rent extraction.
"In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models. After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'" Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose. The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it." The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works.
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees. She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is." These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds."
-
Copyright has limitations and it's about time these limitations are respected. This is the wrong fight to start with AI companies. Copyright is just another form of rent extraction.
"In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models. After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'" Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose. The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it." The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works.
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees. She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is." These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds."
-
#BGH ⚖️ klärt Sampling-Streit um Kraftwerk-Beat | heise online https://www.heise.de/news/BGH-klaert-Sampling-Streit-um-Kraftwerk-Beat-11439779.html #Urheberrecht #copyright
-
Interesting, and perhaps surprising, opinion from the EFF lawyer in there.
-
Courthouse News Service: Fifth Circuit sides with news aggregator in copyright battle. “News aggregator NewsBreak prevailed Thursday in a copyright dispute with a publisher who took issue with embedded news articles displayed on NewBreak’s app. Emmerich Newspapers, which publishes local newspapers across Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas, had challenged a lower court’s decision that […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/08/28/courthouse-news-service-fifth-circuit-sides-with-news-aggregator-in-copyright-battle/ -
Fifth Circuit weighs in on floor plan copyright case, WikiHow sues OpenAI and Sony Music sues Kroger over social media music use.
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2026/08/25/3-count-floor-plan-appeal/
-
PetaPixel: Who Took This JFK Photo? Museum and Collector Clash in Copyright Case. “The photograph in question shows a smiling President Kennedy and first lady Jacqueline Kennedy in their motorcade on the day of his assassination in Dallas on November 22, 1963. In the case, which was first reported by Plagiarism Today, private collector Cade Campbell filed a claim with the Copyright Claims Board […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/06/07/petapixel-who-took-this-jfk-photo-museum-and-collector-clash-in-copyright-case/ -
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox in its long-running lawsuit with the music industry. More than a win for the ISP, the decision could reshape the DMCA.
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2026/03/25/supreme-court-rules-for-cox-weakens-dmca/
-
Excellent argument from @pluralistic.
https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition"Thanks to Trump's incontinent belligerence, we are on the cusp of a 'Post-American Internet,' a new digital nervous system for the 21st century. An internet that we can build without worrying about America's demands and priorities…The US trade representative has forced every one of its trading partners to adopt #anticircumvention law, to facilitate the extraction of their own people's data and money by American firms…But there's a…response… that's just sitting there, begging to be tried: what about repealing anticircumvention law?"
#Copyright #DRM #RightToRepair #TPM #USLaw #USPol #USPolitics #USTR
-
Suno and Udio face new lawsuit; Israeli broadcasters sue TikTok; Brazilian judge tosses Funk Rave copyright case.
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2025/10/21/3-count-funk-rave/
-
Was mir grade klar wird: hätte es schon früher ein #Copyright aufs eigene Gesicht gegeben, wären Millionen an Memes niemals entstanden. Ja, wir brauchen Gesetze gegen #Deepfakes, aber wir dürfen dabei die #Internetkultur nicht mit pauschalen Verboten zerstören. Wer nie ein solches Meme geteilt hat, werfe den ersten Stein. #Savetheinternet
-
Karol G and Tiësto win Don't Be Shy lawsuit, Cloudflare argues against site blocking, and USCO offers new copyright registration toolkit.
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2025/07/14/3-count-overcoming-shyness/
-
Fotografiska bilder och verk hör till upphovsrättslagens klurigare koncept. Skillnaden mellan de två är i stort sett en gråzon som ställer till det för kulturarvsinstitutioner som vill tillgängliggöra fotosamlingar.
I senaste KOD-brevet sammanfattar jag konceptens tillkomst och hur du kan navigera gråzonen mellan fotografiska bilder och verk.https://www.kulturarvochdigitalisering.se/2025/02/foto-eller-foto/
-
Fotografiska bilder och verk hör till upphovsrättslagens klurigare koncept. Skillnaden mellan de två är i stort sett en gråzon som ställer till det för kulturarvsinstitutioner som vill tillgängliggöra fotosamlingar.
I senaste KOD-brevet sammanfattar jag konceptens tillkomst och hur du kan navigera gråzonen mellan fotografiska bilder och verk.https://www.kulturarvochdigitalisering.se/2025/02/foto-eller-foto/
-
Fotografiska bilder och verk hör till upphovsrättslagens klurigare koncept. Skillnaden mellan de två är i stort sett en gråzon som ställer till det för kulturarvsinstitutioner som vill tillgängliggöra fotosamlingar.
I senaste KOD-brevet sammanfattar jag konceptens tillkomst och hur du kan navigera gråzonen mellan fotografiska bilder och verk.https://www.kulturarvochdigitalisering.se/2025/02/foto-eller-foto/
-
Fotografiska bilder och verk hör till upphovsrättslagens klurigare koncept. Skillnaden mellan de två är i stort sett en gråzon som ställer till det för kulturarvsinstitutioner som vill tillgängliggöra fotosamlingar.
I senaste KOD-brevet sammanfattar jag konceptens tillkomst och hur du kan navigera gråzonen mellan fotografiska bilder och verk.https://www.kulturarvochdigitalisering.se/2025/02/foto-eller-foto/
