home.social

#vogtle — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #vogtle, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Fair.org:
    "
    Washington Post Promotes Nuclear Agenda Tied to Bezos’ Investments
    "
    ".. Post has devoted four editorials to supporting the expansion of nuclear energy in the past three months, relying on factual errors and distortions .."

    fair.org/home/washington-post-

    1.4.2026

    #Amazon #Bezos #ClimateChange #CommonwealthEdison #EPA #Exelon #LNT #NRC #NuclearPower #NuclearSafety #NuclearWaste #Plutonium #TerraPower #USA #VCSummer #Vogtle #WashingtonPost #XEnergy

  2. Five Things the “#NuclearBros” Don’t Want You to Know About #SmallModularReactors #SMRs

    by #EdwinLyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists (#UCS)
    April 30, 2024

    "Even casual followers of energy and climate issues have probably heard about the alleged wonders of small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs). This is due in no small part to the 'nuclear bros': an active and seemingly tireless group of #NuclearPower advocates [#Trolls] who dominate social media discussions on energy by promoting SMRs and other 'advanced' #nuclear technologies as the only real solution for the #ClimateCrisis.

    "But as I showed in my 2013 and 2021 reports, the hype surrounding SMRs is way overblown, and my conclusions remain valid today.

    "Unfortunately, much of this SMR happy talk is rooted in #misinformation, which always brings me back to the same question: If the nuclear bros have such a great SMR story to tell, why do they have to exaggerate so much?

    What are SMRs?

    "SMRs are nuclear reactors that are 'small' (defined as 300 megawatts of electrical power or less), can be largely assembled in a centralized facility, and would be installed in a modular fashion at power generation sites. Some proposed SMRs are so tiny (20 megawatts or less) that they are called 'micro' reactors. SMRs are distinct from today’s conventional nuclear plants, which are typically around 1,000 megawatts and were largely custom-built. Some SMR designs, such as #NuScale, are modified versions of operating water-cooled reactors, while others are radically different designs that use coolants other than water, such as liquid sodium, helium gas, or even molten salts.

    "To date, however, theoretical interest in SMRs has not translated into many actual reactor orders. The only SMR currently under construction is in China. And in the United States, only one company—#TerraPower, founded by Microsoft’s Bill Gates — has applied to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a permit to build a power reactor (but at 345 megawatts, it technically isn’t even an SMR).

    "The #NuclearIndustry has pinned its hopes on SMRs primarily because some recent large reactor projects, including #Vogtle units 3 and 4 in the state of #GeorgiaUSA, have taken far longer to build and cost far more than originally projected. The failure of these projects to come in on time and under budget undermines arguments that modern nuclear power plants can overcome the problems that have plagued the nuclear industry in the past.

    "Developers in the industry and the US Department of Energy say that SMRs can be less costly and quicker to build than large reactors and that their modular nature makes it easier to balance power supply and demand. They also argue that reactors in a variety of sizes would be useful for a range of applications beyond grid-scale electrical power, including providing process heat to industrial plants and power to #DataCenters, #cryptocurrency mining operations, petrochemical production, and even electrical vehicle [#EV] charging stations.

    "Here are five facts about SMRs that the nuclear industry and the 'nuclear bros' who push its message don’t want you, the public, to know."

    Read more:
    blog.ucs.org/edwin-lyman/five-

    #HoltecLies #NuclearPower #NuclearLies #TEPCOLied #NoNukes #NoNukesForAI #NuclearPowerCorruptionAndLies

  3. #Wildfire risks high at #US #NuclearPlants

    Posted on January 19, 2025 by beyondnuclearinternational

    The GAO identifies a number of US nuclear power plant sites that are vulnerable to the possible outbreak of #wildfires where they are located.

    "'According to our analysis of U.S. Forest Service and NRC data, about 20 percent of nuclear power plants (16 of 75) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire,' the GAO report states. 'More specifically, more than one-third of nuclear power plants in the South (nine of 25) and West (three of eight) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire.' The GAO goes on to identify 'Of the 16 plants with high or very high potential for wildfire, 12 are operating and four are shut down.'

    "To analyze exposure to the wildfire hazard potential, the GAO used 2023 data from the U.S. Forest Service’s Wildfire Hazard Potential Map. 'High / very high refers to plants in areas with high or very high wildfire hazard potential. Those nuclear power stations described by GAO as 'high / very high' exposure to wildfires and their locations are excerpted from GAO Appendix III: Nuclear Power Plant Exposure to Selected Natural Hazards.

    Table 1: Potential High Exposure to 'Wildfires' at Operating Nuclear Power Plants

    –AZ / #SAFER, one of two mobile nuclear emergency equipment supply units in the nation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –CA / #DiabloCanyon Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #TurkeyPoint Units 3 & 4 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #EdwinIHatch Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #Vogtle Units Units 1, 2, 3 & 4, nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #BrunswickNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #McGuireNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #ShearonHarris Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH /VERY HIGH”
    –NB / #CooperNuclearPowerStation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #Catawba Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #HBRobinson Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –WA / #ColumbiaNuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    Table 2: Potential High Exposure to “Wildfires” at Shutdown Nuclear Power Plants

    –CA / #SanOnofre Units 1 & 2, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #CrystalRiver, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NJ / #OysterCreek, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NY / #IndianPoint Units 1, 2 & 3, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    "Wildfires can transport #radioactive contamination from nuclear facilities

    "A historical review of wildfires that occur around nuclear facilities (research, military and commercial power) identifies that these events are also a very effective transport mechanism of radioactivity previously generated at these sites and subsequently released into the environment by accident, spills and leaks, and careless dumping. The radioactivity is #resuspended by wildfires that occur years, even decades later.

    "The fires carry the radioactivity on smoke particles #downwind, thus expanding the zone of #contamination further and further with each succeeding fire. The dispersed #radionuclides can have very long half-lives meaning they remain biologically hazardous in the environment for decades, centuries and longer."

    Read more:
    beyondnuclearinternational.org
    #Downwinders #NoNukes #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NuclearSafety #ClimateCrisis

  4. #Wildfire risks high at #US #NuclearPlants

    Posted on January 19, 2025 by beyondnuclearinternational

    The GAO identifies a number of US nuclear power plant sites that are vulnerable to the possible outbreak of #wildfires where they are located.

    "'According to our analysis of U.S. Forest Service and NRC data, about 20 percent of nuclear power plants (16 of 75) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire,' the GAO report states. 'More specifically, more than one-third of nuclear power plants in the South (nine of 25) and West (three of eight) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire.' The GAO goes on to identify 'Of the 16 plants with high or very high potential for wildfire, 12 are operating and four are shut down.'

    "To analyze exposure to the wildfire hazard potential, the GAO used 2023 data from the U.S. Forest Service’s Wildfire Hazard Potential Map. 'High / very high refers to plants in areas with high or very high wildfire hazard potential. Those nuclear power stations described by GAO as 'high / very high' exposure to wildfires and their locations are excerpted from GAO Appendix III: Nuclear Power Plant Exposure to Selected Natural Hazards.

    Table 1: Potential High Exposure to 'Wildfires' at Operating Nuclear Power Plants

    –AZ / #SAFER, one of two mobile nuclear emergency equipment supply units in the nation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –CA / #DiabloCanyon Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #TurkeyPoint Units 3 & 4 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #EdwinIHatch Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #Vogtle Units Units 1, 2, 3 & 4, nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #BrunswickNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #McGuireNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #ShearonHarris Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH /VERY HIGH”
    –NB / #CooperNuclearPowerStation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #Catawba Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #HBRobinson Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –WA / #ColumbiaNuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    Table 2: Potential High Exposure to “Wildfires” at Shutdown Nuclear Power Plants

    –CA / #SanOnofre Units 1 & 2, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #CrystalRiver, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NJ / #OysterCreek, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NY / #IndianPoint Units 1, 2 & 3, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    "Wildfires can transport #radioactive contamination from nuclear facilities

    "A historical review of wildfires that occur around nuclear facilities (research, military and commercial power) identifies that these events are also a very effective transport mechanism of radioactivity previously generated at these sites and subsequently released into the environment by accident, spills and leaks, and careless dumping. The radioactivity is #resuspended by wildfires that occur years, even decades later.

    "The fires carry the radioactivity on smoke particles #downwind, thus expanding the zone of #contamination further and further with each succeeding fire. The dispersed #radionuclides can have very long half-lives meaning they remain biologically hazardous in the environment for decades, centuries and longer."

    Read more:
    beyondnuclearinternational.org
    #Downwinders #NoNukes #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NuclearSafety #ClimateCrisis

  5. #Wildfire risks high at #US #NuclearPlants

    Posted on January 19, 2025 by beyondnuclearinternational

    The GAO identifies a number of US nuclear power plant sites that are vulnerable to the possible outbreak of #wildfires where they are located.

    "'According to our analysis of U.S. Forest Service and NRC data, about 20 percent of nuclear power plants (16 of 75) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire,' the GAO report states. 'More specifically, more than one-third of nuclear power plants in the South (nine of 25) and West (three of eight) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire.' The GAO goes on to identify 'Of the 16 plants with high or very high potential for wildfire, 12 are operating and four are shut down.'

    "To analyze exposure to the wildfire hazard potential, the GAO used 2023 data from the U.S. Forest Service’s Wildfire Hazard Potential Map. 'High / very high refers to plants in areas with high or very high wildfire hazard potential. Those nuclear power stations described by GAO as 'high / very high' exposure to wildfires and their locations are excerpted from GAO Appendix III: Nuclear Power Plant Exposure to Selected Natural Hazards.

    Table 1: Potential High Exposure to 'Wildfires' at Operating Nuclear Power Plants

    –AZ / #SAFER, one of two mobile nuclear emergency equipment supply units in the nation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –CA / #DiabloCanyon Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #TurkeyPoint Units 3 & 4 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #EdwinIHatch Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #Vogtle Units Units 1, 2, 3 & 4, nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #BrunswickNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #McGuireNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #ShearonHarris Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH /VERY HIGH”
    –NB / #CooperNuclearPowerStation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #Catawba Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #HBRobinson Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –WA / #ColumbiaNuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    Table 2: Potential High Exposure to “Wildfires” at Shutdown Nuclear Power Plants

    –CA / #SanOnofre Units 1 & 2, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #CrystalRiver, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NJ / #OysterCreek, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NY / #IndianPoint Units 1, 2 & 3, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    "Wildfires can transport #radioactive contamination from nuclear facilities

    "A historical review of wildfires that occur around nuclear facilities (research, military and commercial power) identifies that these events are also a very effective transport mechanism of radioactivity previously generated at these sites and subsequently released into the environment by accident, spills and leaks, and careless dumping. The radioactivity is #resuspended by wildfires that occur years, even decades later.

    "The fires carry the radioactivity on smoke particles #downwind, thus expanding the zone of #contamination further and further with each succeeding fire. The dispersed #radionuclides can have very long half-lives meaning they remain biologically hazardous in the environment for decades, centuries and longer."

    Read more:
    beyondnuclearinternational.org
    #Downwinders #NoNukes #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NuclearSafety #ClimateCrisis

  6. #Wildfire risks high at #US #NuclearPlants

    Posted on January 19, 2025 by beyondnuclearinternational

    The GAO identifies a number of US nuclear power plant sites that are vulnerable to the possible outbreak of #wildfires where they are located.

    "'According to our analysis of U.S. Forest Service and NRC data, about 20 percent of nuclear power plants (16 of 75) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire,' the GAO report states. 'More specifically, more than one-third of nuclear power plants in the South (nine of 25) and West (three of eight) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire.' The GAO goes on to identify 'Of the 16 plants with high or very high potential for wildfire, 12 are operating and four are shut down.'

    "To analyze exposure to the wildfire hazard potential, the GAO used 2023 data from the U.S. Forest Service’s Wildfire Hazard Potential Map. 'High / very high refers to plants in areas with high or very high wildfire hazard potential. Those nuclear power stations described by GAO as 'high / very high' exposure to wildfires and their locations are excerpted from GAO Appendix III: Nuclear Power Plant Exposure to Selected Natural Hazards.

    Table 1: Potential High Exposure to 'Wildfires' at Operating Nuclear Power Plants

    –AZ / #SAFER, one of two mobile nuclear emergency equipment supply units in the nation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –CA / #DiabloCanyon Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #TurkeyPoint Units 3 & 4 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #EdwinIHatch Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #Vogtle Units Units 1, 2, 3 & 4, nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #BrunswickNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #McGuireNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #ShearonHarris Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH /VERY HIGH”
    –NB / #CooperNuclearPowerStation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #Catawba Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #HBRobinson Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –WA / #ColumbiaNuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    Table 2: Potential High Exposure to “Wildfires” at Shutdown Nuclear Power Plants

    –CA / #SanOnofre Units 1 & 2, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #CrystalRiver, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NJ / #OysterCreek, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NY / #IndianPoint Units 1, 2 & 3, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    "Wildfires can transport #radioactive contamination from nuclear facilities

    "A historical review of wildfires that occur around nuclear facilities (research, military and commercial power) identifies that these events are also a very effective transport mechanism of radioactivity previously generated at these sites and subsequently released into the environment by accident, spills and leaks, and careless dumping. The radioactivity is #resuspended by wildfires that occur years, even decades later.

    "The fires carry the radioactivity on smoke particles #downwind, thus expanding the zone of #contamination further and further with each succeeding fire. The dispersed #radionuclides can have very long half-lives meaning they remain biologically hazardous in the environment for decades, centuries and longer."

    Read more:
    beyondnuclearinternational.org
    #Downwinders #NoNukes #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NuclearSafety #ClimateCrisis

  7. #Wildfire risks high at #US #NuclearPlants

    Posted on January 19, 2025 by beyondnuclearinternational

    The GAO identifies a number of US nuclear power plant sites that are vulnerable to the possible outbreak of #wildfires where they are located.

    "'According to our analysis of U.S. Forest Service and NRC data, about 20 percent of nuclear power plants (16 of 75) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire,' the GAO report states. 'More specifically, more than one-third of nuclear power plants in the South (nine of 25) and West (three of eight) are located in areas with a high or very high potential for wildfire.' The GAO goes on to identify 'Of the 16 plants with high or very high potential for wildfire, 12 are operating and four are shut down.'

    "To analyze exposure to the wildfire hazard potential, the GAO used 2023 data from the U.S. Forest Service’s Wildfire Hazard Potential Map. 'High / very high refers to plants in areas with high or very high wildfire hazard potential. Those nuclear power stations described by GAO as 'high / very high' exposure to wildfires and their locations are excerpted from GAO Appendix III: Nuclear Power Plant Exposure to Selected Natural Hazards.

    Table 1: Potential High Exposure to 'Wildfires' at Operating Nuclear Power Plants

    –AZ / #SAFER, one of two mobile nuclear emergency equipment supply units in the nation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –CA / #DiabloCanyon Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #TurkeyPoint Units 3 & 4 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #EdwinIHatch Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –GA / #Vogtle Units Units 1, 2, 3 & 4, nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #BrunswickNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #McGuireNC Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NC / #ShearonHarris Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH /VERY HIGH”
    –NB / #CooperNuclearPowerStation, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #Catawba Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –SC / #HBRobinson Units 1 & 2 nuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –WA / #ColumbiaNuclear power station, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    Table 2: Potential High Exposure to “Wildfires” at Shutdown Nuclear Power Plants

    –CA / #SanOnofre Units 1 & 2, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –FL / #CrystalRiver, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NJ / #OysterCreek, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”
    –NY / #IndianPoint Units 1, 2 & 3, “HIGH / VERY HIGH”

    "Wildfires can transport #radioactive contamination from nuclear facilities

    "A historical review of wildfires that occur around nuclear facilities (research, military and commercial power) identifies that these events are also a very effective transport mechanism of radioactivity previously generated at these sites and subsequently released into the environment by accident, spills and leaks, and careless dumping. The radioactivity is #resuspended by wildfires that occur years, even decades later.

    "The fires carry the radioactivity on smoke particles #downwind, thus expanding the zone of #contamination further and further with each succeeding fire. The dispersed #radionuclides can have very long half-lives meaning they remain biologically hazardous in the environment for decades, centuries and longer."

    Read more:
    beyondnuclearinternational.org
    #Downwinders #NoNukes #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NuclearSafety #ClimateCrisis