home.social

#throttling — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #throttling, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Taiwan drills send ‘serious’ message with more realism, internet throttling

    Taiwan tensions As 10 days of exercises wrap up, observers see progress but warn of hybrid threats A…
    #Conflict #Conflicts #War #China #ChinaTaiwanConflicts #drills #internet #message #more #realism #send #serious #Taiwan #throttling
    europesays.com/3192727/

  2. Hot summers and gaming: why your FPS drops without you noticing

    In summer, heat can quietly affect your gaming performance without you noticing. Discover why your FPS drops and how to keep your PC cool during long gaming sessions.

    Read more: mastanet.com/article/hot-summe

    #gaming #heat #FPS #drops #overheating #PC #thermal #throttling #performance #summer #CPU #temperature #GPU

  3. Hot summers and gaming: why your FPS drops without you noticing

    In summer, heat can quietly affect your gaming performance without you noticing. Discover why your FPS drops and how to keep your PC cool during long gaming sessions.

    Read more: mastanet.com/article/hot-summe

    #gaming #heat #FPS #drops #overheating #PC #thermal #throttling #performance #summer #CPU #temperature #GPU

  4. Hot summers and gaming: why your FPS drops without you noticing

    In summer, heat can quietly affect your gaming performance without you noticing. Discover why your FPS drops and how to keep your PC cool during long gaming sessions.

    Read more: mastanet.com/article/hot-summe

    #gaming #heat #FPS #drops #overheating #PC #thermal #throttling #performance #summer #CPU #temperature #GPU

  5. Hot summers and gaming: why your FPS drops without you noticing

    In summer, heat can quietly affect your gaming performance without you noticing. Discover why your FPS drops and how to keep your PC cool during long gaming sessions.

    Read more: mastanet.com/article/hot-summe

    #gaming #heat #FPS #drops #overheating #PC #thermal #throttling #performance #summer #CPU #temperature #GPU

  6. Hot summers and gaming: why your FPS drops without you noticing

    In summer, heat can quietly affect your gaming performance without you noticing. Discover why your FPS drops and how to keep your PC cool during long gaming sessions.

    Read more: mastanet.com/article/hot-summe

    #gaming #heat #FPS #drops #overheating #PC #thermal #throttling #performance #summer #CPU #temperature #GPU

  7. “CGNATs also create significant operational fallout stemming from the fact that hundreds or even thousands of clients can appear to originate from a single IP address,” wrote Cloudflare researchers Vasilis Giotsas and Marwan Fayed. “This means an IP-based security system may inadvertently block or throttle large groups of users as a result of a single user behind the CGNAT engaging in malicious activity.”

    theregister.com/2025/11/03/clo

    #cybersecurity #cgnat #throttling

  8. “CGNATs also create significant operational fallout stemming from the fact that hundreds or even thousands of clients can appear to originate from a single IP address,” wrote Cloudflare researchers Vasilis Giotsas and Marwan Fayed. “This means an IP-based security system may inadvertently block or throttle large groups of users as a result of a single user behind the CGNAT engaging in malicious activity.”

    theregister.com/2025/11/03/clo

    #cybersecurity #cgnat #throttling

  9. “CGNATs also create significant operational fallout stemming from the fact that hundreds or even thousands of clients can appear to originate from a single IP address,” wrote Cloudflare researchers Vasilis Giotsas and Marwan Fayed. “This means an IP-based security system may inadvertently block or throttle large groups of users as a result of a single user behind the CGNAT engaging in malicious activity.”

    theregister.com/2025/11/03/clo

    #cybersecurity #cgnat #throttling

  10. “CGNATs also create significant operational fallout stemming from the fact that hundreds or even thousands of clients can appear to originate from a single IP address,” wrote Cloudflare researchers Vasilis Giotsas and Marwan Fayed. “This means an IP-based security system may inadvertently block or throttle large groups of users as a result of a single user behind the CGNAT engaging in malicious activity.”

    theregister.com/2025/11/03/clo

    #cybersecurity #cgnat #throttling

  11. “CGNATs also create significant operational fallout stemming from the fact that hundreds or even thousands of clients can appear to originate from a single IP address,” wrote Cloudflare researchers Vasilis Giotsas and Marwan Fayed. “This means an IP-based security system may inadvertently block or throttle large groups of users as a result of a single user behind the CGNAT engaging in malicious activity.”

    theregister.com/2025/11/03/clo

    #cybersecurity #cgnat #throttling

  12. A GitHub binary download rate throttled? Has anyone noticed if GitHub implements some kind of download speed limit? And do downloads frequently seem to be restricted to around 100 KiB/s ~1Mbit/s. The speed then constantly fluctuates around that level. #github #download #speed #throttling

  13. A GitHub binary download rate throttled? Has anyone noticed if GitHub implements some kind of download speed limit? And do downloads frequently seem to be restricted to around 100 KiB/s ~1Mbit/s. The speed then constantly fluctuates around that level, sometimes a bit above, sometimes a bit below. This can't be anything other than an intentionally implemented limiter. #github #download #speed #throttling
  14. A GitHub binary download rate throttled? Has anyone noticed if GitHub implements some kind of download speed limit? And do downloads frequently seem to be restricted to around 100 KiB/s ~1Mbit/s. The speed then constantly fluctuates around that level, sometimes a bit above, sometimes a bit below. This can't be anything other than an intentionally implemented limiter. #github #download #speed #throttling
  15. A GitHub binary download rate throttled? Has anyone noticed if GitHub implements some kind of download speed limit? And do downloads frequently seem to be restricted to around 100 KiB/s ~1Mbit/s. The speed then constantly fluctuates around that level, sometimes a bit above, sometimes a bit below. This can't be anything other than an intentionally implemented limiter. #github #download #speed #throttling
  16. A GitHub binary download rate throttled? Has anyone noticed if GitHub implements some kind of download speed limit? And do downloads frequently seem to be restricted to around 100 KiB/s ~1Mbit/s. The speed then constantly fluctuates around that level, sometimes a bit above, sometimes a bit below. This can't be anything other than an intentionally implemented limiter. #github #download #speed #throttling
  17. Last week, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the FCC,
    rejecting its authority to classify broadband as a Title II “telecommunications service.”

    In doing so, the court removed net neutrality protections for all Americans
    and  took away the FCC’s ability to meaningfully regulate internet service providers.

    This ruling fundamentally gets wrong the reality of internet service we all live with every day.
    Nearly 80% of Americans view broadband access to be as important as water and electricity.
    It is no longer an extra, non-necessary “information service,” as it was seen 40 years ago,
    but it is a vital medium of communication in everyday life.

    Business, health services, education, entertainment, our social lives, and more have increasingly moved online.
    By ruling that broadband “information service” and not a “telecommunications service”
    this court is saying that the ISPs that control your broadband access will continue to face little to no oversight for their actions.
    This is intolerable.
    Net neutrality is the principle that ISPs treat all data that travels over their network equally,
    without improper discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites, or services.
    At its core, net neutrality is a principle of equity and protector of innovation
    —that, at least online, large monopolistic ISPs don’t get to determine winners and losers.
    Net neutrality ensures that users determine their online experience, not ISPs.
    As such, it is fundamental to user choice, access to information, and free expression online.

    By removing protections against actions like #blocking, #throttling, and #paid #prioritization,
    the court gives those willing and able to pay ISPs an advantage over those who are not.
    It privileges large legacy corporations that have partnerships with the big ISPs,
    and it means that newer, smaller, or niche services will have trouble competing, even if they offer a superior service.
    It means that ISPs can throttle your service
    –or that of, say, a fire department fighting the largest wildfire in state history.
    They can block a service they don’t like.
    In addition to charging you for access to the internet, they can charge services and websites for access to you, -- artificially driving up costs.
    And where most Americans have little choice in home broadband providers, i
    t means these ISPs will be able to exercise their #monopoly power not just on the price you pay for access, but how you access and engage with information as well.
    Moving forward, now more than ever it becomes important for individual states to pass their own net neutrality laws,
    or defend the ones they have on the books.
    #California passed a gold standard net neutrality law in 2018 that has survivedjudicial scrutiny.
    It is up to us to ensure it remains in place.
    #Congress can also end this endless whiplash of reclassification and decide, once and for all, by passing a law classifying broadband internet services firmly under Title II.
    Such proposals have been introduced before;
    they ought to be introduced again.

    eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/sixt

  18. Last week, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the FCC,
    rejecting its authority to classify broadband as a Title II “telecommunications service.”

    In doing so, the court removed net neutrality protections for all Americans
    and  took away the FCC’s ability to meaningfully regulate internet service providers.

    This ruling fundamentally gets wrong the reality of internet service we all live with every day.
    Nearly 80% of Americans view broadband access to be as important as water and electricity.
    It is no longer an extra, non-necessary “information service,” as it was seen 40 years ago,
    but it is a vital medium of communication in everyday life.

    Business, health services, education, entertainment, our social lives, and more have increasingly moved online.
    By ruling that broadband “information service” and not a “telecommunications service”
    this court is saying that the ISPs that control your broadband access will continue to face little to no oversight for their actions.
    This is intolerable.
    Net neutrality is the principle that ISPs treat all data that travels over their network equally,
    without improper discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites, or services.
    At its core, net neutrality is a principle of equity and protector of innovation
    —that, at least online, large monopolistic ISPs don’t get to determine winners and losers.
    Net neutrality ensures that users determine their online experience, not ISPs.
    As such, it is fundamental to user choice, access to information, and free expression online.

    By removing protections against actions like #blocking, #throttling, and #paid #prioritization,
    the court gives those willing and able to pay ISPs an advantage over those who are not.
    It privileges large legacy corporations that have partnerships with the big ISPs,
    and it means that newer, smaller, or niche services will have trouble competing, even if they offer a superior service.
    It means that ISPs can throttle your service
    –or that of, say, a fire department fighting the largest wildfire in state history.
    They can block a service they don’t like.
    In addition to charging you for access to the internet, they can charge services and websites for access to you, -- artificially driving up costs.
    And where most Americans have little choice in home broadband providers, i
    t means these ISPs will be able to exercise their #monopoly power not just on the price you pay for access, but how you access and engage with information as well.
    Moving forward, now more than ever it becomes important for individual states to pass their own net neutrality laws,
    or defend the ones they have on the books.
    #California passed a gold standard net neutrality law in 2018 that has survivedjudicial scrutiny.
    It is up to us to ensure it remains in place.
    #Congress can also end this endless whiplash of reclassification and decide, once and for all, by passing a law classifying broadband internet services firmly under Title II.
    Such proposals have been introduced before;
    they ought to be introduced again.

    eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/sixt

  19. Last week, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the FCC,
    rejecting its authority to classify broadband as a Title II “telecommunications service.”

    In doing so, the court removed net neutrality protections for all Americans
    and  took away the FCC’s ability to meaningfully regulate internet service providers.

    This ruling fundamentally gets wrong the reality of internet service we all live with every day.
    Nearly 80% of Americans view broadband access to be as important as water and electricity.
    It is no longer an extra, non-necessary “information service,” as it was seen 40 years ago,
    but it is a vital medium of communication in everyday life.

    Business, health services, education, entertainment, our social lives, and more have increasingly moved online.
    By ruling that broadband “information service” and not a “telecommunications service”
    this court is saying that the ISPs that control your broadband access will continue to face little to no oversight for their actions.
    This is intolerable.
    Net neutrality is the principle that ISPs treat all data that travels over their network equally,
    without improper discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites, or services.
    At its core, net neutrality is a principle of equity and protector of innovation
    —that, at least online, large monopolistic ISPs don’t get to determine winners and losers.
    Net neutrality ensures that users determine their online experience, not ISPs.
    As such, it is fundamental to user choice, access to information, and free expression online.

    By removing protections against actions like #blocking, #throttling, and #paid #prioritization,
    the court gives those willing and able to pay ISPs an advantage over those who are not.
    It privileges large legacy corporations that have partnerships with the big ISPs,
    and it means that newer, smaller, or niche services will have trouble competing, even if they offer a superior service.
    It means that ISPs can throttle your service
    –or that of, say, a fire department fighting the largest wildfire in state history.
    They can block a service they don’t like.
    In addition to charging you for access to the internet, they can charge services and websites for access to you, -- artificially driving up costs.
    And where most Americans have little choice in home broadband providers, i
    t means these ISPs will be able to exercise their #monopoly power not just on the price you pay for access, but how you access and engage with information as well.
    Moving forward, now more than ever it becomes important for individual states to pass their own net neutrality laws,
    or defend the ones they have on the books.
    #California passed a gold standard net neutrality law in 2018 that has survivedjudicial scrutiny.
    It is up to us to ensure it remains in place.
    #Congress can also end this endless whiplash of reclassification and decide, once and for all, by passing a law classifying broadband internet services firmly under Title II.
    Such proposals have been introduced before;
    they ought to be introduced again.

    eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/sixt

  20. Last week, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the FCC,
    rejecting its authority to classify broadband as a Title II “telecommunications service.”

    In doing so, the court removed net neutrality protections for all Americans
    and  took away the FCC’s ability to meaningfully regulate internet service providers.

    This ruling fundamentally gets wrong the reality of internet service we all live with every day.
    Nearly 80% of Americans view broadband access to be as important as water and electricity.
    It is no longer an extra, non-necessary “information service,” as it was seen 40 years ago,
    but it is a vital medium of communication in everyday life.

    Business, health services, education, entertainment, our social lives, and more have increasingly moved online.
    By ruling that broadband “information service” and not a “telecommunications service”
    this court is saying that the ISPs that control your broadband access will continue to face little to no oversight for their actions.
    This is intolerable.
    Net neutrality is the principle that ISPs treat all data that travels over their network equally,
    without improper discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites, or services.
    At its core, net neutrality is a principle of equity and protector of innovation
    —that, at least online, large monopolistic ISPs don’t get to determine winners and losers.
    Net neutrality ensures that users determine their online experience, not ISPs.
    As such, it is fundamental to user choice, access to information, and free expression online.

    By removing protections against actions like #blocking, #throttling, and #paid #prioritization,
    the court gives those willing and able to pay ISPs an advantage over those who are not.
    It privileges large legacy corporations that have partnerships with the big ISPs,
    and it means that newer, smaller, or niche services will have trouble competing, even if they offer a superior service.
    It means that ISPs can throttle your service
    –or that of, say, a fire department fighting the largest wildfire in state history.
    They can block a service they don’t like.
    In addition to charging you for access to the internet, they can charge services and websites for access to you, -- artificially driving up costs.
    And where most Americans have little choice in home broadband providers, i
    t means these ISPs will be able to exercise their #monopoly power not just on the price you pay for access, but how you access and engage with information as well.
    Moving forward, now more than ever it becomes important for individual states to pass their own net neutrality laws,
    or defend the ones they have on the books.
    #California passed a gold standard net neutrality law in 2018 that has survivedjudicial scrutiny.
    It is up to us to ensure it remains in place.
    #Congress can also end this endless whiplash of reclassification and decide, once and for all, by passing a law classifying broadband internet services firmly under Title II.
    Such proposals have been introduced before;
    they ought to be introduced again.

    eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/sixt

  21. Last week, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the FCC,
    rejecting its authority to classify broadband as a Title II “telecommunications service.”

    In doing so, the court removed net neutrality protections for all Americans
    and  took away the FCC’s ability to meaningfully regulate internet service providers.

    This ruling fundamentally gets wrong the reality of internet service we all live with every day.
    Nearly 80% of Americans view broadband access to be as important as water and electricity.
    It is no longer an extra, non-necessary “information service,” as it was seen 40 years ago,
    but it is a vital medium of communication in everyday life.

    Business, health services, education, entertainment, our social lives, and more have increasingly moved online.
    By ruling that broadband “information service” and not a “telecommunications service”
    this court is saying that the ISPs that control your broadband access will continue to face little to no oversight for their actions.
    This is intolerable.
    Net neutrality is the principle that ISPs treat all data that travels over their network equally,
    without improper discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites, or services.
    At its core, net neutrality is a principle of equity and protector of innovation
    —that, at least online, large monopolistic ISPs don’t get to determine winners and losers.
    Net neutrality ensures that users determine their online experience, not ISPs.
    As such, it is fundamental to user choice, access to information, and free expression online.

    By removing protections against actions like #blocking, #throttling, and #paid #prioritization,
    the court gives those willing and able to pay ISPs an advantage over those who are not.
    It privileges large legacy corporations that have partnerships with the big ISPs,
    and it means that newer, smaller, or niche services will have trouble competing, even if they offer a superior service.
    It means that ISPs can throttle your service
    –or that of, say, a fire department fighting the largest wildfire in state history.
    They can block a service they don’t like.
    In addition to charging you for access to the internet, they can charge services and websites for access to you, -- artificially driving up costs.
    And where most Americans have little choice in home broadband providers, i
    t means these ISPs will be able to exercise their #monopoly power not just on the price you pay for access, but how you access and engage with information as well.
    Moving forward, now more than ever it becomes important for individual states to pass their own net neutrality laws,
    or defend the ones they have on the books.
    #California passed a gold standard net neutrality law in 2018 that has survivedjudicial scrutiny.
    It is up to us to ensure it remains in place.
    #Congress can also end this endless whiplash of reclassification and decide, once and for all, by passing a law classifying broadband internet services firmly under Title II.
    Such proposals have been introduced before;
    they ought to be introduced again.

    eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/sixt

  22. I've been experimenting with #GPU #throttling a bit: Adjusting GPU frequency can save up to 30% power with just a 10% #performance tradeoff for #AI workloads. A compelling case for #power #efficiency / #sustainable computing!

    More info here on my blog: nohuddleoffense.de/2024/12/17/

    (And yes, the performance on my GPU is bad, but the principles holds true for larger systems - up to those ~1000W TDP GPUs)

  23. I've been experimenting with #GPU #throttling a bit: Adjusting GPU frequency can save up to 30% power with just a 10% #performance tradeoff for #AI workloads. A compelling case for #power #efficiency / #sustainable computing!

    More info here on my blog: nohuddleoffense.de/2024/12/17/

    (And yes, the performance on my GPU is bad, but the principles holds true for larger systems - up to those ~1000W TDP GPUs)

  24. I've been experimenting with #GPU #throttling a bit: Adjusting GPU frequency can save up to 30% power with just a 10% #performance tradeoff for #AI workloads. A compelling case for #power #efficiency / #sustainable computing!

    More info here on my blog: nohuddleoffense.de/2024/12/17/

    (And yes, the performance on my GPU is bad, but the principles holds true for larger systems - up to those ~1000W TDP GPUs)

  25. I've been experimenting with #GPU #throttling a bit: Adjusting GPU frequency can save up to 30% power with just a 10% #performance tradeoff for #AI workloads. A compelling case for #power #efficiency / #sustainable computing!

    More info here on my blog: nohuddleoffense.de/2024/12/17/

    (And yes, the performance on my GPU is bad, but the principles holds true for larger systems - up to those ~1000W TDP GPUs)

  26. I've been experimenting with #GPU #throttling a bit: Adjusting GPU frequency can save up to 30% power with just a 10% #performance tradeoff for #AI workloads. A compelling case for #power #efficiency / #sustainable computing!

    More info here on my blog: nohuddleoffense.de/2024/12/17/

    (And yes, the performance on my GPU is bad, but the principles holds true for larger systems - up to those ~1000W TDP GPUs)

  27. Throttling в процессорах — инволюция. Зеленые против Красных

    Мы привыкли, что производительность процессоров растет с каждой новой моделью. Иначе зачем их покупать? Зеленые технологии в процессорах ранее присутствовали, но легко управлялись через схему питания в Windows. Однако новый кластер серверов от Lenovo сумел неприятно удивить, а после изучения документации возникло много вопросов к архитекторам и архитектуре. И зеленое будущее уже видится не таким приятным.

    habr.com/ru/articles/861874/

    # #throttling #процессор #сервер #экономия

  28. Throttling в процессорах — инволюция. Зеленые против Красных

    Мы привыкли, что производительность процессоров растет с каждой новой моделью. Иначе зачем их покупать? Зеленые технологии в процессорах ранее присутствовали, но легко управлялись через схему питания в Windows. Однако новый кластер серверов от Lenovo сумел неприятно удивить, а после изучения документации возникло много вопросов к архитекторам и архитектуре. И зеленое будущее уже видится не таким приятным.

    habr.com/ru/articles/861874/

    # #throttling #процессор #сервер #экономия

  29. Throttling в процессорах — инволюция. Зеленые против Красных

    Мы привыкли, что производительность процессоров растет с каждой новой моделью. Иначе зачем их покупать? Зеленые технологии в процессорах ранее присутствовали, но легко управлялись через схему питания в Windows. Однако новый кластер серверов от Lenovo сумел неприятно удивить, а после изучения документации возникло много вопросов к архитекторам и архитектуре. И зеленое будущее уже видится не таким приятным.

    habr.com/ru/articles/861874/

    # #throttling #процессор #сервер #экономия

  30. [Перевод] Контроль пропускной способности (троттлинг) API c помощью шлюза авторизации OpenIG

    Эта статья является продолжением серии статей о защите веб сервисов при помощи шлюза с открытым исходным кодом OpenIG . В этой статье мы рассмотрим, как защитить сервисы, ограничив количество запросов за определенное время времени.

    habr.com/ru/articles/828826/

    #throttling #openig #authorization #gate

  31. [Перевод] Контроль пропускной способности (троттлинг) API c помощью шлюза авторизации OpenIG

    Эта статья является продолжением серии статей о защите веб сервисов при помощи шлюза с открытым исходным кодом OpenIG . В этой статье мы рассмотрим, как защитить сервисы, ограничив количество запросов за определенное время времени.

    habr.com/ru/articles/828826/

    #throttling #openig #authorization #gate

  32. [Перевод] Контроль пропускной способности (троттлинг) API c помощью шлюза авторизации OpenIG

    Эта статья является продолжением серии статей о защите веб сервисов при помощи шлюза с открытым исходным кодом OpenIG . В этой статье мы рассмотрим, как защитить сервисы, ограничив количество запросов за определенное время времени.

    habr.com/ru/articles/828826/

    #throttling #openig #authorization #gate

  33. data caps should be illegal. I shouldn't have the equivalent of 1990s dial-up in the 2020s.

    #DataCaps #NetNeutrality #throttling #internet #DialUp

  34. data caps should be illegal. I shouldn't have the equivalent of 1990s dial-up in the 2020s.

    #DataCaps #NetNeutrality #throttling #internet #DialUp

  35. data caps should be illegal. I shouldn't have the equivalent of 1990s dial-up in the 2020s.

    #DataCaps #NetNeutrality #throttling #internet #DialUp

  36. data caps should be illegal. I shouldn't have the equivalent of 1990s dial-up in the 2020s.

    #DataCaps #NetNeutrality #throttling #internet #DialUp

  37. Victory! #FCC Closes Loopholes and Restores #NetNeutrality

    The FCC’s final adopted order on net neutrality restores bright line rules against all forms of #throttling, once again creating strong federal protections for all Americans.

    eff.org/deeplinks/2024/05/vict