home.social

#stablecoins — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #stablecoins, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Le pari de Trump sur les stablecoins met le système financier en danger
    les-crises.fr/le-pari-de-trump
    L’engouement du gouvernement américain pour les cryptomonnaies dites « stablecoins » ne se limite pas à la corruption à la Trump ou au lobbying industriel. Il s’agit d’une tentative visant à réduire les coûts des emprunts fédéraux, une initiative qui pourrait, à long terme, compromettre la stabilité du système financier. Source : Jacobin, David MartinTraduit […]
    #Politique #Finance #Stablecoins #Usa

  2. Le pari de Trump sur les stablecoins met le système financier en danger
    les-crises.fr/le-pari-de-trump
    L’engouement du gouvernement américain pour les cryptomonnaies dites « stablecoins » ne se limite pas à la corruption à la Trump ou au lobbying industriel. Il s’agit d’une tentative visant à réduire les coûts des emprunts fédéraux, une initiative qui pourrait, à long terme, compromettre la stabilité du système financier. Source : Jacobin, David MartinTraduit […]
    #Politique #Finance #Stablecoins #Usa

  3. Amazon Japan distributor AZ-Com Maruwa to adopt yen stablecoin JPYC for payments

    A Japanese logistics company that counts Amazon Japan as a client plans to settle payments in the regulated yen stablecoin JPYC with business partners, including independent truck drivers, according to a report by Nikkei Asia. Tokyo-listed AZ-COM Maruwa Holding…
    #Japan #JP #JapanNews #news #stablecoins
    alojapan.com/1514149/amazon-ja

  4. alojapan.com/1514149/amazon-ja Amazon Japan distributor AZ-Com Maruwa to adopt yen stablecoin JPYC for payments #Japan #JapanNews #news #stablecoins A Japanese logistics company that counts Amazon Japan as a client plans to settle payments in the regulated yen stablecoin JPYC with business partners, including independent truck drivers, according to a report by Nikkei Asia. Tokyo-listed AZ-COM Maruwa Holdings (9090), which reported 230.5 billion yen ($1.4 billion) in revenu

  5. VISA initiates a "beta" release of "VISA Stablecoin Platform" (VSP) an expansion of its stablecoin infrastructure to support its network of ~ 15,000 financial institutions ~ 200M merchants.

    Participating institutions can mint, burn, hold, redeem, and transfer the OUSD stabelcoin to enable them to embed stablecoin capabilities into treasury, liquidity, and payment operations.

    Further, clients can use Visa’s Wallet-as-a-Service infrastructure or connect existing wallets while linking bank accounts and establishing internal approval policies.

    VISA clams the platform includes dual-control authorization, audit logging, secure passkeys and transfer allow lists designed to satisfy institutional governance and security requirements. news.bitcoin.com/visa-stableco #VISA #Crypto #Stablecoins #OUSD #CryptoCurrencies #Blockchain #FinancialServices #CryptoWallets #VSP #Security #Treasury #Liquidity #Banking #Credit

  6. VISA initiates a "beta" release of "VISA Stablecoin Platform" (VSP) an expansion of its stablecoin infrastructure to support its network of ~ 15,000 financial institutions ~ 200M merchants.

    Participating institutions can mint, burn, hold, redeem, and transfer the OUSD stabelcoin to enable them to embed stablecoin capabilities into treasury, liquidity, and payment operations.

    Further, clients can use Visa’s Wallet-as-a-Service infrastructure or connect existing wallets while linking bank accounts and establishing internal approval policies.

    VISA clams the platform includes dual-control authorization, audit logging, secure passkeys and transfer allow lists designed to satisfy institutional governance and security requirements. news.bitcoin.com/visa-stableco

  7. #Visa launched the #VisaStablecoin Platform, an internal system allowing #banks and #fintechs to handle #stablecoins within existing Visa workflows. The platform, launching with #OUSD, aims to simplify stablecoin use for Visa’s network of financial institutions and merchants. Visa believes stablecoins will be central to future financial infrastructure and is focused on helping clients understand and integrate their utility. fortune.com/2026/07/16/exclusi #crypto #blockchain

  8. #Visa launched the #VisaStablecoin Platform, an internal system allowing #banks and #fintechs to handle #stablecoins within existing Visa workflows. The platform, launching with #OUSD, aims to simplify stablecoin use for Visa’s network of financial institutions and merchants. Visa believes stablecoins will be central to future financial infrastructure and is focused on helping clients understand and integrate their utility. fortune.com/2026/07/16/exclusi #crypto #blockchain

  9. Stablecoins solved volatility for crypto payments, but chain fragmentation created a new checkout problem: the right token can still be on the wrong network. hackernoon.com/stablecoin-paym #stablecoins

  10. Stablecoins solved volatility for crypto payments, but chain fragmentation created a new checkout problem: the right token can still be on the wrong network. hackernoon.com/stablecoin-paym #stablecoins

  11. Stablecoins are shifting from crypto trading tools to payment infrastructure, driven by card spend, B2B payments, PIX integration, and regulation. hackernoon.com/the-stablecoin- #stablecoins

  12. Stablecoins are shifting from crypto trading tools to payment infrastructure, driven by card spend, B2B payments, PIX integration, and regulation. hackernoon.com/the-stablecoin- #stablecoins

  13. Die Architektur tokenisierten Geldes ist entscheidend: Banken, die Standards, Settlement und Systemintegration jetzt meistern, prägen die digitale Finanzmarkt-Infrastruktur. Während Stablecoins stagnieren, bewegen Banken auf Permissioned Blockchains jährlich Billionen – viel mehr als der gesamte Stablecoin-Markt.
    #Aktuell #Schwerpunkt #Blockchain #StableCoins #Stablec...
    it-finanzmagazin.de/tokenisier

  14. Contradictions

    In my previous post I poured some distilled thoughts over a couple of bitcoin outlooks and arrived at salient contrasts:
    Signal and Noise
    Today, full credits for the feature image and the 200 character summary go to ChatGPT.
    I will elaborate on a number of contradictions that since bubbled up. I will lead with a couple macro themes of most pertinence to the markets. From there, we will revisit a central thesis of this blog, namely universal basic income. The discussion, albeit brief, will make the presented thesis significantly more specific. So motivated, addressing the thesis in the context of this post will mirror an additional layer of complexity that the specificity itself introduced. Ultimately, the post will fade into the matter of U.K. politics, regarding current events – aligning to the discussions my earlier, more raw posts were centred on. Some of that earlier tone will feed through, as my sentiments are unchanged. I’ve kept it isolated as I assume many wouldn’t agree with the lengths I go to nor, hence, find the criticism pleasant.
    The issues are highlighted, should you wish to quickly scroll through.

    If I think the economy is about to tank then why don’t I think the Fed needs to cut?
    Well, in short – because the more imminent problem is inflation.
    Many recessions were led into by the Fed tightening. I mentioned already that between a hard and a soft landing the Powell Fed was delivering no landing. They unmistakably delivered inflation, failed to tame and now left it to Warsh. To their credit, the Covid shock and the prelude to it showed central banks indeed control inflation, if you doubted that. And this was through the issuance of base money.
    Today’s world is slightly different than the one we found in 2020, most pertinently due to the abandonment of a fractional reserve. The primary factors that determine inflation are supply and demand. Both are recorded as monetary quantities. Things such as “late cycle credit growth” come to mind. Ultimately, should Warsh come to rely on a restricted quantity of reserves to combat the phenomenon of inflation he will find that the only effect will be to strain liquidity in the inter-bank system. The lesser availability of reserves will increase their price and this itself will pressure the effective spot rate upwards of the Fed’s target. An offsetting factor we can expect to find will be a premium on payment settlement, which should ring a bell as the issue central to stablecoin regulation. So, should we restrict one form of base money (the reserves) we may find it substituted with another (short dated treasuries, i.e. bills). I already warned about the fact that the regulation de facto removes the Fed’s monopoly on determining the money supply as well as talked through the risks. Here we will again traverse these topics. The exact point of the stablecoin regulation is to ensure the stablecoins are fungible in place of dollars: they’re everything a dollar is, except not being issued by banks through credit but backed by a reserve made up of the U.S. Treasury bills and the actual dollars issued by commercial banks. It’s evident the Fed’s influence on the supply of stablecoin-money is only in the second order. While I previously warned against stablecoin issuers making a windfall by not passing through income, currently their insistence on being able to do just that coupled with our context highlights the issue as central to offsetting inflationary pressure: you will be less likely to spend your stablecoin if it bears higher interest. Under this circumstance nothing at all is lost: the Fed maintains effective control of inflation even as the money supply grows independently and so makes raising the spot rate more probable.
    It’s the ability to deliver on the employment side of the dual mandate that comes into question.
    The core mantra of monetarism is that it’s not the quantity of money that matters but rather the rate of interest.
    If we find the money supply has increased, which aggregates that construe it have changed? Clearly, the actual circulating supply of the stablecoin-money expands the aggregate of effective liquidity, to a degree inversely proportional to the spot rate. The created-but-not-spent as well as spent-but-idle coins would count towards the liquid savings of the private sector. However, holding these is equivalent to holding Treasury debt and the proportion so backed should be excluded. As well, being backed in part by deposits these are not actually deposits and by very definition can’t be deposits. Hence, it’s appropriate to exclude counting the so backed proportion too. Our answer is an increase in effective liquidity to the degree the issued stablecoins are backed by T-bills.
    Should tokenised payments come to dominate the real economy, cet. par. a good amount of currency will be released from use. By definition we find that a proportion of the already existent dollars in turn shifts into the residual component of the money supply, where it latently supports the prices of financial assets – ranging from debt to bitcoin. A sudden increase in latent deposits in fact pressures lending rates down. (But a bank lending below the funds rate would soon need to borrow reserves in order to make inter-bank payments.) If the result is that spreads compress and lending volume increases, if only to fund tokenisation, the banks will have found a seemingly endless supply of deposits and, we would expect, aggregate demand shifted up.
    We find a currency increased in offer but has lost utility and short term government debt that gained it.
    Conversely, should payment beneficiaries for whatever reason prefer converting the stablecoins to actual dollars we will find downward pressure on the stablecoins’ par value as well as upward pressure on T-bill yields. If interest rates are elevated and the rate of de-leveraging exceeds that of leveraging we shall naturally find the money supply declining.
    Monetising sovereign debt through tokenisation is a weak form of the so-called modern monetary theory. As such, it’s inherently inflationary and necessitates higher spot rates. Luckily, in our world debt bears interest and hopefully the conclusion of the debate regarding stablecoins will be that it’s OK to pass it through.
    A data-aware central bank certainly should be able to successfully navigate this environment. Despite remarks, it remains unclear how much of its credibility would the Fed trade-off against an inflationary overshoot, as well as when would T-bills be spent – likely if their yield falls below inflation, regardless if the economy stalls or booms (when it’s in fact expected returns that would kick off the cycle of selling the instruments). Clearly, inflation being the default outcome of variance in growth surely is a consequence of the high level of financiation (i.e. “storing value” in instruments without intrinsic value) that predates stablecoins, which, merely, make it more probable.
    Warsh Fed’s expected path (in so far as there is such a thing) is seemingly counter-balanced by the stablecoin universe and in a good way. This universe would indeed act as “rails” that support valuation of both bitcoin and bonds. Money would remain hot and inflation an overarching issue. The front end of the yield curve would sell off and the far end rally. We may see spreads between the spot rate and bill yields widen. Flatteners all of the sudden again seem like a sure thing, free money. But, between now and then the stablecoins actually need to come to life and U.S. growth and issuance remain sustained and limited, respectively. It’s the perception of a crisis at a time of moderate growth that allows for accomodative policy that allows for bonds and risk assets to simultaneously rally. If growth sputters or the crisis mistakenly appears fixed, like we said numerous times already, all bets may be off.

    How is it that a crisis of the dollar would not lead bitcoin to materially appreciate?
    Well, strictly speaking – and I analised this already – yes, the fall in value of a currency would lead to an increase in the nominal price of select real assets denominated in it, even if they fall in value expressed in other currencies. The thing to observe is that in this scenario bitcoin might come in focus as an alternative currency (framework) that would then be dismissed as inappropriate. It can not save the world because it isn’t a viable currency. By observing its hypothesis fail, it would lose value. But also, and more importantly, it’s the U.S. that is the “crypto capital of the world.” A crisis of its currency implies a crisis of its economy and therefore weakens the crypto world. Crypto is built on top of the current monetary system. It can not function without it. And if it could, this would certainly not be because it has furthered monetary theory. Hence, if the economy is in crisis replacing one thing that’s failing with another built on the same principles will not resolve anything. Crypto fails under the burden of evidence on its own accord.
    But then again, bitcoin – and the orthodoxies associated with it – is the currency – and the monetary framework – of choice of the global right. Like Tesla and SpaceX stock, we shouldn’t be surprised to find their price supported as while we find unwavering commitment of acolites.
    In a future AI-ruled utopia, do we expect to find tweaks to the current monetary framework, it replaced with one that makes managing the economy harder, or no such thing at all?
    What are the remaining valid crypto hypothesis? Being the last known survivors? The ultimate lenders?
    It’s a space shared with gold, facing different challenges.

    Wouldn’t UBI lead to inflation?
    UBI distributed as investment credits is a thesis central to this blog.
    The following figures1 summarise, showing my expectation of the evolution of GDP in response to changes in the distribution of inequality.

    It’s evident the boost in demand, ahead of any adjustment on the supply side, would lead to inflation.
    Regardless of UBI, a liberal trade regime and investment following a schedule where those with the highest expected returns are made first result in global specialisation based on competitive advantages that minimises costs and maximises supply – i.e. arrives at optimal efficiency.
    Assuming that developing countries have both a larger consumption gap, i.e. suffer from greater inequality, and a competitive advantage in terms of labour costs, the benefits of UBI should be comparably greater than in the developed world.
    The following paragraph may read unsavoury to some.
    In the developed world, the inequality coupled with political organisation among the better-off precisely act to prevent a further drain of demand and investment abroad. The ruling castes are disciplined. Everyone’s aspiration should be to invest every effort to join them, abandoning all intellectual integrity. Especially since this bifurcation is permanent, including the serfdom of the worse-off – for the perfidiously and silently implied benefit of the realm.
    In an open developed economy, we assume the benefits presented in Figure 2. and 3. would, to a significant extent, be transferred abroad.
    Precisely this limits domestic inflation: it’s exported – together with employment.
    A shift in the ownership distribution of investment while its aggregate volume remains fixed should not lead to a change in its geographic distribution. That is, of course, true only so far as the anterior distribution is efficient – i.e. not excessively affected by political factors. Also, if we expect a more equal distribution of investment to increase competition this should result in their decreased efficiency – in the sense presented in the above figures. A single integrated investor balances its income and expenditure, trading off pricing power and salary expenses. In such a centrally managed economy the growth of demand, credit, and in turn profit is directly determined by the ability of the planners to predict and control the tastes of the population. Competition decreases prices. If we hold the view that the core benefit of a free market economy is to both allow the discovery of consumer preferences and increase supply-side efficiencies through open competition, then we should expect a normalisation of investment to result in greater real output. Where I have previously allowed for the change to be Pareto-neutral, now I can no longer claim this to be certain. By decreasing the transfer of wealth accessible through financialisation and the leveraging of property rights in favour of a performance based distribution of income we motivate the quest for knowledge and achievement which are the bedrocks of progress. Changes leading to a more granular and specialised economy, besides increasing incentive for personal productive attainment and responsibility – a historical advantage of the capitalist over the communist system, allow aligning competition horizontally instead of vertically where efficiency is averaged out as gains in one area are offset by losses in another.
    Reducing the effective strain of the workday increases the fitness of the population and releases potential energy.
    Viewed in global aggregate, or in terms of a closed economy UBI is beneficial. If this is so, then in terms of competition between countries and economies the outcome should be that those who adopt the policy end up employing those who don’t. The exact focus of terms of trade should then be to ensure property rights. More precisely, this means investment can flow across borders only when there is a clear understanding and agreement regarding what, under the letters of the laws, are the appropriate protections of benefits associated with ownership. Absent such an agreement, trade should nonetheless flow on a basis of exchange of raw materials, finished goods and services. If that was so, a country adopting UBI should cet. par. find itself in possession of offerings in higher demand and a natural position of running a trade surplus.
    In general, inflation occurs when demand – measured in terms of currency – increases relative to supply. UBI implemented as outlined in the figures above doesn’t escape this fact. However, I found it pertubes – for the better – what in real terms is attainable at a given price-point.

    Keir Starmer quits as Labour leader and PM?
    This couldn’t have come any sooner. Here things get feisty but I sure won’t sound like Kemi.
    To carry over a bit of context from the previous section, the European Union – despite all its hype of social justice – utterly fails at delivering a meaningful progressive agenda. To the contrary, and the tune of the so-called European People’s Party, what prevails is a blend of modern feudalism and a state-centred quasi-socialist planned economy. It’s a union in which lobbying the Commission is the peak of business, in which the right in power is bouyed by the right (mostly) in opposition that would aim for the same outcomes but with more authorithanian, Draconian methods – beyond a plot twist. It’s a union that replicates without understanding, that is clueless, that can’t even begin to conceptualise what the errors of economics are, yet along find alternatives. It is with such a Union that Keir Starmer was “rebuilding our relationship.” It’s such a fold he was busy realigning with. It’s his fold.
    In taking credit for moving the Party past being “bankrupt” (in the many ways) he implies there wasn’t anything between Johnson’s Conservatives and Corbyn’s Labour. Yet, he took forward both the lack of vision and the patchy alternatives. Antisemitism has no place in life. Standing firm in that regard must be the standard. To this Keir Starmer can take credit, in so far as his assertions held true. But what truly was that changed about the Party, that made its narrative suddenly so compelling? Havock in the other camp and a patched facade were the start.
    The task? To carry forward a society “where everyone is seen, everyone is valued.” He speaks differently, but continues to deliver surveillance and profiling for security. This mustn’t be so.
    An economy atop G7? Yes, due to work not done in Q4/25 carrying over into Q1/26, a statical anomaly – a straw. Inflation making the well-off better off and an economy wobbly as “the series of interest rates cuts” he was so proud of is about to get unwound to counter it. Investment? Infrastructure? Big government running pulling (the) strings, not the houses promised. “Fastest fall in NHS waiting lists for 17 years?” Yeah, maybe, in absolute not relative terms. (I’m not aware if those are the right statistics, but they are out there.) “Rights for workers and renters” something granted by decree, not what arises naturally in the unfolding of society. A government not setting conditions for the right outcomes to emerge but patching gaps. Old, insufficient ways. “Biggest uplift in defence spending since the Cold War” really something that should make us all feel secure and press the pedal for more, more, more. “Tough on Putin” (rightly) can’t be a blank slate for mindlessness. War is not change, but neither will every peace be.
    The job of the leader of Labour or any party on the left isn’t and can’t ever be to gaslight the people. That is for the Boris Johnsons, Trumps and Farrages of the world, the von der Leyens and Kallas’es.
    But he did one thing right – he left, and left in good style. For that, Sir Keir, thank you.
    We can’t blame him, nor Labour for there being forces of darkness that lurk.
    In practical terms, there is lots of unfinished work – reforms that fell short. The most important is the electoral system: to amend first-past-the-post with preferential voting. The European proportional representation system ensures that fringe parties are a reality that the mainstream can push off against. Contrary to it stands a choice between progress and decadence, civilization and tyranny which so amended would include our preferences on who to lead the way.

    1. If you believe it, Claude 4.6 1-shot the image (except for a superficial mistake that it duly corrected). ChatGPT pulled off a better presented result but I was unable to get it to fix a few inconsistencies, while Gemini 3.5 and 3.1 failed to interpret my highly narrative prompt. ↩︎
    #Bitcoin #BTC #Burnham #crypto #dollar #Economics #Economy #EPP #EU #Fed #finance #inflation #interestRates #Investing #Labour #Markets #Powell #Stablecoins #Starmer #UBI #UK #USD #Warsh
  15. Транзакция — это верификация

    После пяти месяцев отсутствия на этой блог площадке по личным причинам мы возвращаемся с заметкой, которая была написана еще в конце февраля, но оказалось, что все еще не устарела. Девять лет мы в IDX работали за кадром. Буквально. Наши сервисы верификации персональных данных существовали в пространстве между двумя защищёнными периметрами — клиентским бизнесом, которому нужно убедиться в подлинности данных своего пользователя, и государственными реестрами, которые эти данные хранят. Мы обеспечивали своего рода «гальваническую развязку»: два контура работают, обмениваются сигналом, но никогда не соприкасаются напрямую. Это была надёжная, понятная и хорошо зарекомендовавшая себя архитектура. Была — до недавнего времени. Сегодня на рынке произошло сразу несколько событий, которые в совокупности меняют саму логику того, как устроена верификация. И этот текст — попытка осмыслить, к чему именно мы движемся и что это означает для нас как для индустрии. Периметр умер. Давно, просто не все заметили Традиционная архитектура информационной безопасности строилась на простой идее: есть доверенная зона внутри периметра и ненадёжный мир снаружи. Попал внутрь — считаешься своим. Именно на этой логике строилась и большая часть корпоративных систем, и первые поколения сервисов верификации: достаточно один раз проверить пользователя «на входе», и дальше ему доверяют автоматически. Эта модель разрушалась постепенно. Утечки данных, облачные инфраструктуры, удалённая работа — всё это размыло понятие «периметра» задолго до того, как появился термин Zero Trust. Но именно в 2020–2025 годах концепция нулевого доверия оформилась в конкретные стандарты и начала реально влиять на то, как строятся системы.

    habr.com/ru/companies/idx/arti

    #блокчейнтехнологии #stablecoins #цифровой_рубль

  16. Chainlink has partnered with 47 South Korean and European banks to launch Project Pangea, using stablecoins to settle multimillion USD currency trades between Europe and South Korea in near real time. coindesk.com/markets/2026/06/2 #Web3 #Blockchain #Stablecoins

  17. Get to know x402 – The Artist Soon To Be Known as Agentic AI Payments!

    Automated machine-to-machine payments have been conceptualized for years - The x402 payment standard is about to make it a reality!

    Get ready for AI Agents to autonomously spend YOUR money on the open internet! open.substack.com/pub/techapti #AI #AgenticAI #x402 #x402Protocol #AutonomousPayments #Blockchain #DigitalCurrencies #StableCoins #Micropayments #PayPerUse #USDC #EURC #TechAptitude

  18. Get to know x402 – The Artist Soon To Be Known as Agentic AI Payments!

    Automated machine-to-machine payments have been conceptualized for years - The x402 payment standard is about to make it a reality!

    Get ready for AI Agents to autonomously spend YOUR money on the open internet! open.substack.com/pub/techapti

  19. Safirum bringt 2026 mit CHF-S einen vollständig durch Schweizer Franken gedeckten Stablecoin auf Solana, reguliert durch FINMA und VQF, auf den Markt. Das Ziel: Banken, Börsen und IT-Profis erhalten erstmals direkten, auditierbaren Franken-Zugang für Blockchain-Anwendungen.
    #Aktuell #FinTech #Security #Zahlungsverkehr #Kryptowährungen #Solana #StableCoins #Stablecoin
    http...
    it-finanzmagazin.de/neuer-stab

  20. Stablecoins sind dabei, traditionelle, langsame Korrespondenzbank-Netzwerke abzulösen und bieten Entwicklern neue, programmierbare Infrastruktur für Echtzeit-Zahlungen weltweit. Sie transformieren den Zahlungsverkehr durch niedrige Latenzen, hohe Transparenz und direkte, blockchain-basierte Transaktionen.
    #Aktuell #Schwerpunkt #Blockchain #DistributedLedger #MiCA #StableCoins #x26...
    it-finanzmagazin.de/von-krypto

  21. Money became programmable and payments now run without humans: two chapters of one race where almost everything still settles in dollars. hackernoon.com/stablecoins-aut #stablecoins

  22. Money became programmable and payments now run without humans: two chapters of one race where almost everything still settles in dollars. hackernoon.com/stablecoins-aut #stablecoins

  23. Good news everybody! It’s a million degrees and a 1000% humidity in DC for BirthdayBoi’s #UFC human cockfight. The mosquitoes and noseeums are out in force, according to pocket friends on the ground.

    According to The Weather Channel, there will be a 60 percent chance of thunderstorms, heavy downpours, and wind gusts up to 34 miles per hour.

    And it gets better. UFC said fighters will receive payment in #WorldLibertyFinancial #crypto called “#stablecoins”. World Liberty named the currency “#USD1”.

    World Liberty is a venture of the #Trump family and the family of Steven #Witkoff, Trump’s friend and special envoy to the Middle East. The company is now listed as an “official sponsor” of UFC Freedom 250, the fight scheduled for later today.

    Conflict of interest? Never met her. Grift all the way down with #republicans man. All the way down.

    #gop #kakistocracy #moronsOnParade

  24. Good news everybody! It’s a million degrees and a 1000% humidity in DC for BirthdayBoi’s #UFC human cockfight. The mosquitoes and noseeums are out in force, according to pocket friends on the ground.

    According to The Weather Channel, there will be a 60 percent chance of thunderstorms, heavy downpours, and wind gusts up to 34 miles per hour.

    And it gets better. UFC said fighters will receive payment in #WorldLibertyFinancial #crypto called “#stablecoins”. World Liberty named the currency “#USD1”.

    World Liberty is a venture of the #Trump family and the family of Steven #Witkoff, Trump’s friend and special envoy to the Middle East. The company is now listed as an “official sponsor” of UFC Freedom 250, the fight scheduled for later today.

    Conflict of interest? Never met her. Grift all the way down with #republicans man. All the way down.

    #gop #kakistocracy #moronsOnParade

  25. Banks are now managing liquidity across payments, deposits, lending, collateral, securities, FX, treasury funding, intraday settlement, and trapped legal-entity balances.
    The winners will not be the banks with the most rails.
    They will be the banks that can orchestrate liquidity across all rails, all assets, all entities, and all settlement venues — in real time.
    #Banking #Payments #TokenizedDeposits #Stablecoins #DigitalAssets #Treasury #AI #FinancialServices

    linkedin.com/pulse/mapping-liq

  26. Banks are now managing liquidity across payments, deposits, lending, collateral, securities, FX, treasury funding, intraday settlement, and trapped legal-entity balances.
    The winners will not be the banks with the most rails.
    They will be the banks that can orchestrate liquidity across all rails, all assets, all entities, and all settlement venues — in real time.
    #Banking #Payments #TokenizedDeposits #Stablecoins #DigitalAssets #Treasury #AI #FinancialServices

    linkedin.com/pulse/mapping-liq

  27. 🤖 Visa acaba de confirmar que su infraestructura ahora soporta pagos con stablecoins y agentes de #IA. El futuro del comercio no es humano, es programable. #Visa #Stablecoins #AI

  28. 🤖 Visa acaba de confirmar que su infraestructura ahora soporta pagos con stablecoins y agentes de #IA. El futuro del comercio no es humano, es programable. #Visa #Stablecoins #AI

  29. TechAptitude tackles StableCoins - the Artist also know as "Digital Dollars".

    With an asset base of ~ $300B, Stablecoins are rapidly becoming the crypto market’s most popular asset class. But all Stablecoins are not created equal. There are multiple designs and structures each with its own trade-offs, risks, and real-world use cases.

    Get knowledgeable on Stablecoins here: open.substack.com/pub/techapti #Crypto #Stablecoins #Cryptocurrencies #CryptoRisk #Risk #Security #DigitalMoney #USDT #USDC #Trust #BlockChain #Algorithms #TechAptitude

  30. TechAptitude tackles StableCoins - the Artist also know as "Digital Dollars".

    With an asset base of ~ $300B, Stablecoins are rapidly becoming the crypto market’s most popular asset class. But all Stablecoins are not created equal. There are multiple designs and structures each with its own trade-offs, risks, and real-world use cases.

    Get knowledgeable on Stablecoins here: open.substack.com/pub/techapti

  31. Japan’s three largest banks eye joint stablecoin issue by March 2027

    Three of Japan’s largest banks said they will jointly issue a stablecoin this financial year, which ends in March. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo ⁠Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC) and Mizuho Financial Group will establish a council to explore operational frameworks and pr…
    #Japan #JP #JapanNews #news #stablecoins
    alojapan.com/1496714/japans-th

  32. alojapan.com/1496714/japans-th Japan’s three largest banks eye joint stablecoin issue by March 2027 #Japan #JapanNews #news #stablecoins Three of Japan’s largest banks said they will jointly issue a stablecoin this financial year, which ends in March. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo ⁠Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC) and Mizuho Financial Group will establish a council to explore operational frameworks and prepare for the issuance of stablecoins, according

  33. Financial Boffins are calling out issues/gaps/concerns re the recently passed GENIUS Act that pose RISKS! Here are a few ...

    1. financial regulators need to write capital, liquidity, and risk management requirements for the Act
    2. permissible reserve assets can include uninsured deposits in banks and shares of credit unions
    3. does not prohibit payment stablecoins from being counted as a cash or cash-equivalent asset on a corporate balance sheet
    4.allows for both Treasury repo and Treasury reverse repo transactions to meet liquidity needs
    5. nonfinancial companies can be permitted to issue stablecoins
    6. input from regulators is needed to address risks of stablecoins being used for illicit activities
    7. no reference to maintaining par-value exchange in the secondary markets
    8. no definition of what interoperability actually means
    9. does not address if stablecoins from different issuers should be fungible
    10. lacks requirements for transparency, accountability, and enforcement of technical infrastructure used for stablecoins
    11. prohibits issuers from paying interest or yield to holders, but does not ban third parties from paying interest

    brookings.edu/articles/stablec #Crypto #Stablecoins #GENIUSAct #Congress #Risk #FinancialRisk #MonetarySystem #Money #Cryptocurrencies #MonetaryRisk

  34. Financial Boffins are calling out issues/gaps/concerns re the recently passed GENIUS Act that pose RISKS! Here are a few ...

    1. financial regulators need to write capital, liquidity, and risk management requirements for the Act
    2. permissible reserve assets can include uninsured deposits in banks and shares of credit unions
    3. does not prohibit payment stablecoins from being counted as a cash or cash-equivalent asset on a corporate balance sheet
    4.allows for both Treasury repo and Treasury reverse repo transactions to meet liquidity needs
    5. nonfinancial companies can be permitted to issue stablecoins
    6. input from regulators is needed to address risks of stablecoins being used for illicit activities
    7. no reference to maintaining par-value exchange in the secondary markets
    8. no definition of what interoperability actually means
    9. does not address if stablecoins from different issuers should be fungible
    10. lacks requirements for transparency, accountability, and enforcement of technical infrastructure used for stablecoins
    11. prohibits issuers from paying interest or yield to holders, but does not ban third parties from paying interest

    brookings.edu/articles/stablec

  35. When the giant U.S. Banks collaborate, you know something big is going on!

    Reports indicate in early 2027, three big U.S. Banks, JPMorgan, Citigroup, BoA, will begin offering tokenized deposits via a single network managed by The Clearing House, a bank-owned payments operator.

    Seems the Banks want to counter Stablecoins with blockchain-based settlement options. coindesk.com/markets/2026/06/0 #Banks #Banking #Stablecoins #BlockChain #Crypto #Cryptocurrencies #TokenizedDeposits #OnchainPayments

  36. When the giant U.S. Banks collaborate, you know something big is going on!

    Reports indicate in early 2027, three big U.S. Banks, JPMorgan, Citigroup, BoA, will begin offering tokenized deposits via a single network managed by The Clearing House, a bank-owned payments operator.

    Seems the Banks want to counter Stablecoins with blockchain-based settlement options. coindesk.com/markets/2026/06/0

  37. 📉 La liquidez cripto se seca antes de que el #BOJ y la #Fed toquen el botón. Lsa #stablecoins huyen y el USD/JPY respira fuerte. ¿Corrección o ajuste técnico? El mercado ya lo sabe.

  38. That is quite the round up of bitcoin networks!

    Mastercard expands support for StableCoins with intraday, weekend, and holiday card settlement using both fiat currencies and regulated stablecoins.

    It will transact in Circle’s USDC, Paxos PYUSD, USDG, and USDP, Ripple’s RLUSD, and SoFi's SoFiUSD, with settlement enabled across multiple blockchain networks, including Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum, Canton, Tempo, and the XRP Ledger. mastercard.com/us/en/news-and- #MasterCard #Stablecoins #Blockchain #USDC #PYUSD #USDG #RLUSD #SofiUSD #Ethereum #Ploygon #Block #Arbitrum #Canton #Solana #Tempo #XRPLedger #Crypto #CryptoCurrencies

  39. Bitcoin is crashing. Crypto isn’t.

    #bitcoin #crypto #stablecoins June 2nd, 2026 - Bitcoin broke $70,000. The future of finance didn't. Stablecoins, payment networks, crypto infrastructure, and institutional adoption all continued moving forward as the future financial system takes shape. #hyperliquid #tokenization #blockchain #ai #thedailywolf #yahoofinance Timestamps 00:00 Bitcoin breaks below $70,000 01:50 Why Bitcoin keeps falling 03:20 AI-related crypto projects…

    fllics.com/en/video/bitcoin-is

  40. Interdisziplinäre Ringvorlesung “𝗗𝗶𝗲 𝗭𝘂𝗸𝘂𝗻𝗳𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗚𝗲𝗹𝗱𝗲𝘀” im Sommersemester 2026

    🗓 Mittwoch, 18 Uhr
    📍 TU Darmstadt, Großer Hörsaal im Schloss (S 313/30)

    Anlässlich der Zwischenbilanz von Petra Gehring und Andreas Kerkemeyer in dieser Woche der Hinweis, dass die gehaltenen Vorträge inkl. Folienpräsentation als Videoaufzeichnungen hier verfügbar sind: tu-darmstadt.cloud.panopto.eu/

    Für das gesamte Programm und die noch folgenden Termine siehe: zevedi.de/ringvorlesung-die-zu

    Eine Veranstaltung des Instituts für Philosophie (FB 02) und des Fachgebiets Rechtspolitik für den digitalen Finanzsektor (FB 01) an der @TU in Kooperation mit dem Diskursprojekt zu Demokratiefragen des digitalisierten Finanzsektors am @zevedi

    #digitalerEuro #Digitalgeld #Stablecoins #Souveränität

  41. CRYPTO LANDSCAPE SHIFTS: INDONESIA BANS PREDICTION MARKETS, AI AGENTS EYE STABLECOINS

    Indonesia bans crypto prediction markets as gambling. AI agents are using stablecoins for payments. See how crypto is changing.

    #CryptoRegulation, #Indonesia, #AI, #Stablecoins, #PredictionMarkets

    newsletter.tf/indonesia-bans-c

  42. Indonesia has banned crypto prediction markets, calling them gambling. Meanwhile, AI agents are starting to use stablecoins for payments because they are better for small transactions than card networks.

    #CryptoRegulation, #Indonesia, #AI, #Stablecoins, #PredictionMarkets
    newsletter.tf/indonesia-bans-c

  43. As U.S.-backed stablecoins move closer to widespread global adoption, China is preparing to counter growing dollar dominance by expanding the digital yuan and cross-border payment systems in emerging markets. japantimes.co.jp/commentary/20 #commentary #worldnews #stablecoins #digitaldollars #usdollar #yuan #currencies #forex #cryptocurrencies