## WARNING:
The following is a quote from *Political Gadjets* which is a product of #GenAISlop use. So take it with a grain of salt. I am presuming the summary is predicated on the number of *boosts* and *likes* as well as the number of comments, while the *calculated sentiment* is based on comment content.
> The mood is critical and adversarial, with most posts targeting the major parties, corporate influence, or government failures. Recurring themes include distrust of donors and lobbyists, frustration with housing and cost-of-living pressures, and concern about defence spending and fossil fuels. Engagement is low overall, with most posts receiving no favourites or boosts, so the discussion reads more as a steady stream of advocacy and link-sharing than as a lively exchange. Tone is largely left-leaning and reformist, with some sharp personal attacks, and a notable share of posts comes from policy advocacy accounts rather than ordinary users.
What do people think? Is Aus.Social becoming a host for *propaganda*? Are we seeing more *personal attacks*? I ask because I tend to block posts from political entities like *Fusion Party*, etc. and what I consider *far-anything* or *abusive* accounts so I don’t get to see them anymore. And perhaps because of that, I have not seen much, if any at all, of personal attacks either.
## Curate your feed and talk with *people* not bots or * pamphleteering* accounts is my councel.
Block them with abandon and keep our little community discussions respectful and happy while staying informed and maybe *informing* when we are able to.
PS. A great big thank you to @aussocialadmin for keeping the light on. Let’s get #PostersUnion up and running folks…carefully though.
#AusPol #AusSocial #SocialMedia #Fedi #Masto #SocialMediaBots #Enshitification #CurateYourFeed #BlockOften #Communication #Discussions #ChitChat #SocialMediaCommunity #Moderators #SocialPlatformHosts