home.social

#mathshistory — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #mathshistory, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Hey, it's my birthday today. But please don't feel embarrassed that you didn't get me anything, all I want for my birthday is for you to enjoy today's new episode of #themathematicianspod. This time, Pingala, and a 10 minute beat poem... Please forgive me. #mathsky #mathshistory #poetry

    Episode 56 - Pingala - Beats u...

  2. There is a picture of George Green, the mathematician from Nottingham, doing the rounds on the internet. Alas, this is not the right George Green. Details:

    tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108

    #MathsHistory #MathsHist #MathsToday

  3. There is a picture of George Green, the mathematician from Nottingham, doing the rounds on the internet. Alas, this is not the right George Green. Details:

    tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108

    #MathsHistory #MathsHist #MathsToday

  4. There is a picture of George Green, the mathematician from Nottingham, doing the rounds on the internet. Alas, this is not the right George Green. Details:

    tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108

    #MathsHistory #MathsHist #MathsToday

  5. There is a picture of George Green, the mathematician from Nottingham, doing the rounds on the internet. Alas, this is not the right George Green. Details:

    tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108

    #MathsHistory #MathsHist #MathsToday

  6. There is a picture of George Green, the mathematician from Nottingham, doing the rounds on the internet. Alas, this is not the right George Green. Details:

    tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108

    #MathsHistory #MathsHist #MathsToday

  7. Interesting for me to learn (via mia.ele-math.com/01-05/Why-Hol):

    "Hölder's inequality" was first proven in 1888 by L.J. Rogers.

    In Hölder's paper of 1889, he includes this result, accurately attributing it to Rogers.

    By luck of early citations (including from some big names of the time), the result is now known near-universally as "Hölder's inequality".

    The author of this article subsequently advocates for using "Rogers-Hölder Inequality" going forward.

    #maths #mathshistory

  8. Interesting for me to learn (via mia.ele-math.com/01-05/Why-Hol):

    "Hölder's inequality" was first proven in 1888 by L.J. Rogers.

    In Hölder's paper of 1889, he includes this result, accurately attributing it to Rogers.

    By luck of early citations (including from some big names of the time), the result is now known near-universally as "Hölder's inequality".

    The author of this article subsequently advocates for using "Rogers-Hölder Inequality" going forward.

    #maths #mathshistory

  9. Interesting for me to learn (via mia.ele-math.com/01-05/Why-Hol):

    "Hölder's inequality" was first proven in 1888 by L.J. Rogers.

    In Hölder's paper of 1889, he includes this result, accurately attributing it to Rogers.

    By luck of early citations (including from some big names of the time), the result is now known near-universally as "Hölder's inequality".

    The author of this article subsequently advocates for using "Rogers-Hölder Inequality" going forward.

    #maths #mathshistory

  10. Interesting for me to learn (via mia.ele-math.com/01-05/Why-Hol):

    "Hölder's inequality" was first proven in 1888 by L.J. Rogers.

    In Hölder's paper of 1889, he includes this result, accurately attributing it to Rogers.

    By luck of early citations (including from some big names of the time), the result is now known near-universally as "Hölder's inequality".

    The author of this article subsequently advocates for using "Rogers-Hölder Inequality" going forward.

    #maths #mathshistory

  11. Interesting for me to learn (via mia.ele-math.com/01-05/Why-Hol):

    "Hölder's inequality" was first proven in 1888 by L.J. Rogers.

    In Hölder's paper of 1889, he includes this result, accurately attributing it to Rogers.

    By luck of early citations (including from some big names of the time), the result is now known near-universally as "Hölder's inequality".

    The author of this article subsequently advocates for using "Rogers-Hölder Inequality" going forward.

    #maths #mathshistory

  12. Karl Arthur Umlauf (1866-1945), a student of Friedrich Engel and Sophus Lie in Leipzig, was the first who approached the classification of the "groups of rank zero", in his thesis (1891). These are called nilpotent Lie algebras nowadays, and their classification is still an open problem.
    de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Uml

    #LieTheory #MathsHistory

  13. Karl Arthur Umlauf (1866-1945), a student of Friedrich Engel and Sophus Lie in Leipzig, was the first who approached the classification of the "groups of rank zero", in his thesis (1891). These are called nilpotent Lie algebras nowadays, and their classification is still an open problem.
    de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Uml

    #LieTheory #MathsHistory

  14. Karl Arthur Umlauf (1866-1945), a student of Friedrich Engel and Sophus Lie in Leipzig, was the first who approached the classification of the "groups of rank zero", in his thesis (1891). These are called nilpotent Lie algebras nowadays, and their classification is still an open problem.
    de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Uml

    #LieTheory #MathsHistory

  15. Karl Arthur Umlauf (1866-1945), a student of Friedrich Engel and Sophus Lie in Leipzig, was the first who approached the classification of the "groups of rank zero", in his thesis (1891). These are called nilpotent Lie algebras nowadays, and their classification is still an open problem.
    de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Uml

    #LieTheory #MathsHistory

  16. Karl Arthur Umlauf (1866-1945), a student of Friedrich Engel and Sophus Lie in Leipzig, was the first who approached the classification of the "groups of rank zero", in his thesis (1891). These are called nilpotent Lie algebras nowadays, and their classification is still an open problem.
    de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Uml

    #LieTheory #MathsHistory