home.social

#humanresources — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #humanresources, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Finland woos India’s tech talent with fast visas and a culture of trust

    As the global hunt for AI and STEM talent heats up, Finland is doubling down on India. Through…
    #Finland #FI #Europe #Europa #EU #AI #finland #HimadriMajumdar #hr #humanresources #India #productivity #SemiQon #SkillDevelopment #STEM #Suomi #Techtalent #uutiset #Workforce #workplace
    europesays.com/3193782/

  2. US Companies Grapple with ‘Helicopter Parents’ Intervening in Adult Children’s Jobs

    Photo to aid understanding of the article. Clipart Korea The phenomenon of so-called “helicopter parents” directly intervening in…
    #EuropeSays #Korea #KR #Seoul #GenerationZ #helicopterparents #hiringprocess #HumanResources #jobinterviews #labormarket #parentalinvolvement #USworkplace
    europesays.com/korea/107919/

  3. Australian job mobility slides to 7.2% as job hugging persists

    Workers aged between 25 and 44 years, however, recorded a lower job mobility rate with 8.1%. The decline…
    #NewsBeep #News #Australia #AU #Humanresources #jobmobility #retrenchment
    newsbeep.com/au/834798/

  4. Australian job mobility slides to 7.2% as job hugging persists

    Workers aged between 25 and 44 years, however, recorded a lower job mobility rate with 8.1%. The decline…
    #NewsBeep #News #Australia #AU #Humanresources #jobmobility #retrenchment
    newsbeep.com/au/834798/

  5. Movie TV Tech Geeks #TVFeatures #HughJackman #HumanResources Hugh Jackman’s Most Unexpected Role Is in Netflix’s Weirdest Overlooked Series dlvr.it/TTnMqc

  6. Standard Chartered names Kavita Kulkarni as CTOO

    Standard Chartered has appointed Kavita Kulkarni as its new chief technology & operations officer for India and South…
    #EuropeSays #Britain #Europe #EU #StandardChartered #chieftechnical&operationsofficer #CHRO #CTOO #employee #HR #HumanResources #KavitaKulkarni #recruitment #standardchartered #workforce #workplace
    europesays.com/britain/93782/

  7. Should Companies Audit What Employees Post on Social Media?

    Workplace discussions around responsible social media use are becoming a key part of modern corporate governance. Photo: Vitaly Gariev via Unsplash.

    Dear Cherubs, every employee has a smartphone, a social media account, and, occasionally, the confidence to post something that makes the legal department reach for the aspirin. The question isn’t whether companies notice anymore. It’s whether they should actively monitor what relevant employees post online.

    The answer, in many cases, is yes—but with boundaries.

    WHO COUNTS?

    Not every employee represents a company in the same way. The warehouse worker posting holiday photos isn’t in the same position as the CEO announcing “exciting news” before the stock market opens. A software engineer leaking confidential product details isn’t the same as someone sharing pictures of their dog wearing a tiny hat.

    Roles matter. Executives, senior managers, public relations staff, salespeople, recruiters, customer service representatives, and anyone with access to sensitive information can significantly affect a company’s reputation or even its legal standing.

    According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, companies must ensure material information is disclosed fairly to investors. One careless post from a senior executive could create regulatory headaches and market confusion.

    THE FINE LINE

    Auditing social media shouldn’t mean turning into Big Brother with a Wi-Fi connection.

    Employers generally have legitimate reasons to monitor public posts when they relate directly to company interests, such as confidential information, harassment, discrimination, threats, or conduct that damages the business. What employees discuss privately with friends or within lawful private spaces is a different matter and may be protected by employment laws or privacy legislation depending on the country.

    That’s where many companies stumble. The goal isn’t to police opinions. It’s to manage risk.

    A sensible social media audit focuses on business-related concerns rather than personal beliefs unrelated to work. Otherwise, the company risks becoming the story instead of preventing one.

    COMMON SENSE WINS

    According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), many employers already include social media expectations in workplace policies. The best policies are surprisingly boring—and that’s a compliment.

    They explain what confidential information is.

    They remind employees not to imply they speak for the company unless authorised.

    They encourage respectful online behaviour.

    And they outline what happens if someone ignores those rules.

    No mystery. No secret surveillance. Just expectations.

    Training may actually be more valuable than monitoring. Many social media disasters aren’t malicious—they’re accidental. A frustrated employee vents after work. An enthusiastic executive posts too early. Someone shares a client story without realising confidentiality applies online just as much as it does in the office.

    According to thisclaimer.com, digital reputation has become one of the fastest-moving business risks because online content spreads globally in minutes while apologies travel considerably slower.

    The smartest companies therefore treat social media governance like cybersecurity: prevention first, enforcement second.

    Ultimately, companies absolutely should pay attention to what relevant employees publicly post when those posts could affect customers, shareholders, confidential information or the organisation’s reputation. But auditing should never become blanket surveillance of employees’ personal lives.

    Good governance protects both the company and its people. Bad governance simply creates another PR crisis waiting to trend.

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #businessEthics #Compliance #corporateGovernance #employees #humanResources #leadership #privacy #reputationManagement #socialMedia #Workplace
  8. Should Companies Audit What Employees Post on Social Media?

    Workplace discussions around responsible social media use are becoming a key part of modern corporate governance. Photo: Vitaly Gariev via Unsplash.

    Dear Cherubs, every employee has a smartphone, a social media account, and, occasionally, the confidence to post something that makes the legal department reach for the aspirin. The question isn’t whether companies notice anymore. It’s whether they should actively monitor what relevant employees post online.

    The answer, in many cases, is yes—but with boundaries.

    WHO COUNTS?

    Not every employee represents a company in the same way. The warehouse worker posting holiday photos isn’t in the same position as the CEO announcing “exciting news” before the stock market opens. A software engineer leaking confidential product details isn’t the same as someone sharing pictures of their dog wearing a tiny hat.

    Roles matter. Executives, senior managers, public relations staff, salespeople, recruiters, customer service representatives, and anyone with access to sensitive information can significantly affect a company’s reputation or even its legal standing.

    According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, companies must ensure material information is disclosed fairly to investors. One careless post from a senior executive could create regulatory headaches and market confusion.

    THE FINE LINE

    Auditing social media shouldn’t mean turning into Big Brother with a Wi-Fi connection.

    Employers generally have legitimate reasons to monitor public posts when they relate directly to company interests, such as confidential information, harassment, discrimination, threats, or conduct that damages the business. What employees discuss privately with friends or within lawful private spaces is a different matter and may be protected by employment laws or privacy legislation depending on the country.

    That’s where many companies stumble. The goal isn’t to police opinions. It’s to manage risk.

    A sensible social media audit focuses on business-related concerns rather than personal beliefs unrelated to work. Otherwise, the company risks becoming the story instead of preventing one.

    COMMON SENSE WINS

    According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), many employers already include social media expectations in workplace policies. The best policies are surprisingly boring—and that’s a compliment.

    They explain what confidential information is.

    They remind employees not to imply they speak for the company unless authorised.

    They encourage respectful online behaviour.

    And they outline what happens if someone ignores those rules.

    No mystery. No secret surveillance. Just expectations.

    Training may actually be more valuable than monitoring. Many social media disasters aren’t malicious—they’re accidental. A frustrated employee vents after work. An enthusiastic executive posts too early. Someone shares a client story without realising confidentiality applies online just as much as it does in the office.

    According to thisclaimer.com, digital reputation has become one of the fastest-moving business risks because online content spreads globally in minutes while apologies travel considerably slower.

    The smartest companies therefore treat social media governance like cybersecurity: prevention first, enforcement second.

    Ultimately, companies absolutely should pay attention to what relevant employees publicly post when those posts could affect customers, shareholders, confidential information or the organisation’s reputation. But auditing should never become blanket surveillance of employees’ personal lives.

    Good governance protects both the company and its people. Bad governance simply creates another PR crisis waiting to trend.

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #businessEthics #Compliance #corporateGovernance #employees #humanResources #leadership #privacy #reputationManagement #socialMedia #Workplace
  9. Should Companies Audit What Employees Post on Social Media?

    Workplace discussions around responsible social media use are becoming a key part of modern corporate governance. Photo: Vitaly Gariev via Unsplash.

    Dear Cherubs, every employee has a smartphone, a social media account, and, occasionally, the confidence to post something that makes the legal department reach for the aspirin. The question isn’t whether companies notice anymore. It’s whether they should actively monitor what relevant employees post online.

    The answer, in many cases, is yes—but with boundaries.

    WHO COUNTS?

    Not every employee represents a company in the same way. The warehouse worker posting holiday photos isn’t in the same position as the CEO announcing “exciting news” before the stock market opens. A software engineer leaking confidential product details isn’t the same as someone sharing pictures of their dog wearing a tiny hat.

    Roles matter. Executives, senior managers, public relations staff, salespeople, recruiters, customer service representatives, and anyone with access to sensitive information can significantly affect a company’s reputation or even its legal standing.

    According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, companies must ensure material information is disclosed fairly to investors. One careless post from a senior executive could create regulatory headaches and market confusion.

    THE FINE LINE

    Auditing social media shouldn’t mean turning into Big Brother with a Wi-Fi connection.

    Employers generally have legitimate reasons to monitor public posts when they relate directly to company interests, such as confidential information, harassment, discrimination, threats, or conduct that damages the business. What employees discuss privately with friends or within lawful private spaces is a different matter and may be protected by employment laws or privacy legislation depending on the country.

    That’s where many companies stumble. The goal isn’t to police opinions. It’s to manage risk.

    A sensible social media audit focuses on business-related concerns rather than personal beliefs unrelated to work. Otherwise, the company risks becoming the story instead of preventing one.

    COMMON SENSE WINS

    According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), many employers already include social media expectations in workplace policies. The best policies are surprisingly boring—and that’s a compliment.

    They explain what confidential information is.

    They remind employees not to imply they speak for the company unless authorised.

    They encourage respectful online behaviour.

    And they outline what happens if someone ignores those rules.

    No mystery. No secret surveillance. Just expectations.

    Training may actually be more valuable than monitoring. Many social media disasters aren’t malicious—they’re accidental. A frustrated employee vents after work. An enthusiastic executive posts too early. Someone shares a client story without realising confidentiality applies online just as much as it does in the office.

    According to thisclaimer.com, digital reputation has become one of the fastest-moving business risks because online content spreads globally in minutes while apologies travel considerably slower.

    The smartest companies therefore treat social media governance like cybersecurity: prevention first, enforcement second.

    Ultimately, companies absolutely should pay attention to what relevant employees publicly post when those posts could affect customers, shareholders, confidential information or the organisation’s reputation. But auditing should never become blanket surveillance of employees’ personal lives.

    Good governance protects both the company and its people. Bad governance simply creates another PR crisis waiting to trend.

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #Compliance #privacy #employees #socialMedia #Workplace #leadership #corporateGovernance #businessEthics #reputationManagement #humanResources
  10. All the other kinds of Emacs are inhuman.
    Or unhuman.
    Or both.
    This kind of Emacs, though, is a proud hominid.

    Ha ha only serious.

    #Emacs
    #HumanFactor
    #HumanNature
    #HumanResources

    @screwlisp @glitzersachen

  11. All the other kinds of Emacs are inhuman.
    Or unhuman.
    Or both.
    This kind of Emacs, though, is a proud hominid.

    Ha ha only serious.

    #Emacs
    #HumanFactor
    #HumanNature
    #HumanResources

    @screwlisp @glitzersachen

  12. All the other kinds of Emacs are inhuman.
    Or unhuman.
    Or both.
    This kind of Emacs, though, is a proud hominid.

    Ha ha only serious.

    #Emacs
    #HumanFactor
    #HumanNature
    #HumanResources

    @screwlisp @glitzersachen

  13. All the other kinds of Emacs are inhuman.
    Or unhuman.
    Or both.
    This kind of Emacs, though, is a proud hominid.

    Ha ha only serious.

    #Emacs
    #HumanFactor
    #HumanNature
    #HumanResources

    @screwlisp @glitzersachen

  14. All the other kinds of Emacs are inhuman.
    Or unhuman.
    Or both.
    This kind of Emacs, though, is a proud hominid.

    Ha ha only serious.

    #Emacs
    #HumanFactor
    #HumanNature
    #HumanResources

    @screwlisp @glitzersachen

  15. SUGGESTED READS FOR JULY 14, 2026

    24 HRS IN PHOTOS by Kessel Kramer Asking AI for personal advice is a bad idea, Stanford study shows Personal Encyclopedias — this has blown up my mind, really. When Marketing meets HR

    nicolalosito.it/2026/07/14/sug

  16. SUGGESTED READS FOR JULY 14, 2026

    24 HRS IN PHOTOS by Kessel Kramer Asking AI for personal advice is a bad idea, Stanford study shows Personal Encyclopedias — this has blown up my mind, really. When Marketing meets HR

    nicolalosito.it/2026/07/14/sug

  17. SUGGESTED READS FOR JULY 14, 2026

    24 HRS IN PHOTOS by Kessel Kramer Asking AI for personal advice is a bad idea, Stanford study shows Personal Encyclopedias — this has blown up my mind, really. When Marketing meets HR

    nicolalosito.it/2026/07/14/sug

  18. SAP Is Reinventing People Analytics with SAP BDC

    SAP’s internal IT organization—specifically its People Analytics team—acts as  “customer zero,” serving as the first adopter of new…
    #Germany #DE #Europe #EU #Europa #SAP #Humanresources(HR) #PeopleIntelligence #sap #SAPBusinessDataCloud(SAPBDC)
    europesays.com/germany/51109/

  19. I am still amazed at how quickly someone will ask at work, which campground I was at. And repeatedly.
    "Where" and then "Which campground"? Sometimes even "Yeah, but which campground?"

    I just keep answering
    about the region
    or proximity to
    or borders near
    or ...

    I make them figure out after six times that I'm never going to give them a name.
    #conversation w/ #HumanResources

  20. I am still amazed at how quickly someone will ask at work, which campground I was at. And repeatedly.
    "Where" and then "Which campground"? Sometimes even "Yeah, but which campground?"

    I just keep answering
    about the region
    or proximity to
    or borders near
    or ...

    I make them figure out after six times that I'm never going to give them a name.
    #conversation w/ #HumanResources

  21. I am still amazed at how quickly someone will ask at work, which campground I was at. And repeatedly.
    "Where" and then "Which campground"? Sometimes even "Yeah, but which campground?"

    I just keep answering
    about the region
    or proximity to
    or borders near
    or ...

    I make them figure out after six times that I'm never going to give them a name.
    #conversation w/ #HumanResources

  22. I am still amazed at how quickly someone will ask at work, which campground I was at. And repeatedly.
    "Where" and then "Which campground"? Sometimes even "Yeah, but which campground?"

    I just keep answering
    about the region
    or proximity to
    or borders near
    or ...

    I make them figure out after six times that I'm never going to give them a name.
    #conversation w/ #HumanResources

  23. HRPGD.com

    A concise, professional domain with strong potential for HR, people management, professional development, recruitment, payroll, training, or enterprise solutions.

    Short. Professional. Business-ready.

    Build a trusted brand on a name designed for growth.

    #HRPGD #HRTech #HumanResources #Business #DomainName #Branding

  24. HRPGD.com

    A concise, professional domain with strong potential for HR, people management, professional development, recruitment, payroll, training, or enterprise solutions.

    Short. Professional. Business-ready.

    Build a trusted brand on a name designed for growth.

    #HRPGD #HRTech #HumanResources #Business #DomainName #Branding

  25. Question for anyone who does hiring #HR #HumanResources for #tech or tech-adjacent positions: My company is doing a reorg, and my job title is being changed from "Database Administrator" to "Research Data Analyst Senior" (I work in biomedical research). How do you think this might influence future job prospects, given that my skills are much more aligned with expectations of a DBA than a data analyst? Idk how AI pre-screening and all that works.

  26. Question for anyone who does hiring #HR #HumanResources for #tech or tech-adjacent positions: My company is doing a reorg, and my job title is being changed from "Database Administrator" to "Research Data Analyst Senior" (I work in biomedical research). How do you think this might influence future job prospects, given that my skills are much more aligned with expectations of a DBA than a data analyst? Idk how AI pre-screening and all that works.