home.social

#gatk — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #gatk, aggregated by home.social.

  1. ugly, but it works: I can run a maximum of 50 jobs with a maximum of 500 cpus on our server.

    So I run 10 # gatk HaplotypeCaller in parallel in one nextflow process using `make -j 10` ===> 500 gatk HC at the same time.

    gitlab.univ-nantes.fr/pierre.l

    #nextflow #gatk #make #makefile #bioinformatics #workflow

  2. ugly, but it works: I can run a maximum of 50 jobs with a maximum of 500 cpus on our server.

    So I run 10 # gatk HaplotypeCaller in parallel in one nextflow process using `make -j 10` ===> 500 gatk HC at the same time.

    gitlab.univ-nantes.fr/pierre.l

    #nextflow #gatk #make #makefile #bioinformatics #workflow

  3. TIL: You can get a list of Spark-enabled GATK tools with the command

    gatk --list | grep Spark

    (The website doesn't seem to have a list anywhere)

    #bioinformatics #GATK #ApacheSpark

  4. So after much community backlash #GATK has reverted back to the ./. representation for no-calls.

    The question is, will something like this occur again? and how many people have already switched away to other tools like #bcftools.

    I know I have moved all my pipelines back to bcftools and honestly its brilliant.

    #genomics #bioinformatics

    github.com/broadinstitute/gatk

  5. So after much community backlash #GATK has reverted back to the ./. representation for no-calls.

    The question is, will something like this occur again? and how many people have already switched away to other tools like #bcftools.

    I know I have moved all my pipelines back to bcftools and honestly its brilliant.

    #genomics #bioinformatics

    github.com/broadinstitute/gatk

  6. I was given a BAM. I see the following tags in the SAM:

    'de:f:0.0067 rl:i:0 cm:i:19 nn:i:0 tp:A:P ms:i:288'

    #GATK HaplotypeCaller crashed because of those tags. ( gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en- )

    The only tools used (header/@PG) are bwa: 7.15-r1142-dirty and MarkDuplicates.
    which tool added those tags ?

    #sam #bam #bwa

  7. I was given a BAM. I see the following tags in the SAM:

    'de:f:0.0067 rl:i:0 cm:i:19 nn:i:0 tp:A:P ms:i:288'

    #GATK HaplotypeCaller crashed because of those tags. ( gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en- )

    The only tools used (header/@PG) are bwa: 7.15-r1142-dirty and MarkDuplicates.
    which tool added those tags ?

    #sam #bam #bwa

  8. nature.com/articles/s41598-022 "Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment" #gatk #dragen #deepvariant #genomics #wgs

  9. nature.com/articles/s41598-022 "Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment" #gatk #dragen #deepvariant #genomics #wgs

  10. nature.com/articles/s41598-022 "Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment" #gatk #dragen #deepvariant #genomics #wgs

  11. nature.com/articles/s41598-022 "Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment" #gatk #dragen #deepvariant #genomics #wgs

  12. I've have the feeling that the #VCF called by ILMN / #dragen and #gatk are quite different. 🤔

  13. I've have the feeling that the #VCF called by ILMN / #dragen and #gatk are quite different. 🤔

  14. I've have the feeling that the #VCF called by ILMN / #dragen and #gatk are quite different. 🤔

  15. I've have the feeling that the #VCF called by ILMN / #dragen and #gatk are quite different. 🤔